Æther Physics

This paper summarizes how a new approach to the Universe based on the existence of a "crystalline ether", which has recently been detailed in the third versions of two books [1], makes it possible to find a simple, unified and coherent explanation of all the theories of modern physics and of the Universe. The basic concepts of this approach can be summarized as follows: (i) the support of the Universe is a form of "crystalline ether" which consists of a solid and massive lattice, of facecentered cubic structure, with the simplest possible elasticity, and in which matter is represented by the set of topological singularities of this lattice (loops of dislocations, disinclinations and dispirations), and (ii) this lattice exclusively satisfies, in absolute space, the basic classical physical concepts that are Newton's law and the two principles of thermodynamics. With these basic classical concepts alone, we show that it is possible to find all the modern theories of physics, namely that the behaviors of this lattice (the Universe) and its topological singularities (the Matter) satisfy electromagnetism, special relativity, general relativity, gravitation, quantum physics, cosmology and even the standard model of elementary particles.

This paper gives an account of the Gestalt Aether Theory of gravity. Gestalt Aether Theory clearly establishes the connection between electromagnetism and gravity and is able to account for every known or observed property of gravity. It offers a format for extremely precise calculations on the force of gravity.

Measuring the line speed of vehicles detached from a land and moving far from navigation systems is a difficult task. It would be great to have a speed measuring device working as much as possible regardless of location and which is reliable enough. Earth's vehicles, such as cars, ships, airplanes, are equipped with autonomous speedometers. With their help, the speed of movement relative to the environment (land, water, air) is measured. Is it possible to create such a speedometer, for which only the luminiferous medium and energy would be sufficient? It looks like yes. To implement this idea, one can use electromagnetic waves (light), and the fact that light can be entrained by a moving transparent medium.

Ce papier résume comment une nouvelle approche de l’Univers basée sur l’existence d’un «éther cristallin», qui a été récemment exposée en détail dans les troisièmes versions de deux livres [1], permet de trouver une explication simple, unifiée et cohérente de l’ensemble des théories de la physique moderne et de l’Univers. Les concepts de base de cette approche peuvent se résumer de la manière suivante: (i) le support de l’Univers est une forme d’«éther cristallin» qui consiste en un réseau solide et massif, de structure cubique à faces centrées, avec une élasticité la plus simple possible, et dans lequel la matière est représentée par l'ensemble des singularités topologiques de ce réseau (boucles de dislocations, de désinclinaisons et de dispirations), et (ii) ce réseau satisfait exclusivement, dans l'espace absolu, les concepts physiques classiques de base que sont la loi de Newton et les deux principes de la thermodynamique. Avec ces seuls concepts de base tout-à-fait classiques, on montre qu’il est possible de retrouver toutes les théories modernes de la physique, à savoir que les comportements de ce réseau (l’Univers) et de ses singularités topologiques (la Matière) satisfont à l’électromagnétisme, la relativité spéciale, la relativité générale, la gravitation, la physique quantique, la cosmologie et même le modèle standard des particules élémentaires.

To Whom It May Concern;
In the consideration of the New Cold War, which is comprised of (a) the Cultural Civil War, (b) the World War 3.0, and (c) the asymmetric attacks of the West’s strategic enemies, chiefly China and Russia, or other anti-NATO and pseudo-NATO allies who play the horizontal-vertical game of “entangled alliances” ‘by ear’ (aka “fair weather friends”), the author has the following proposal.
->The most opportune time for the supposed/alleged aliens to attack (or for a fake alien attack/false flag to be planned) is approaching, perhaps by the year 2025-2027

The historical linkage between optics and electromagnetism can be traced back to the year 1855, when Wilhelm Eduard Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch, by discharging a Leyden Jar (a capacitor), demonstrated that the ratio of the electrostatic and electrodynamic units of charge is equal to c√2, where c is the directly measured speed of light. Although not initially aware of the connection to the speed of light, Weber interpreted c√2 as a kind of mutual escape velocity for two elements of electricity in relative motion, such as would enable the induced magnetic force to overcome the mutual electrostatic force. A few years later, James Clerk Maxwell converted this ratio from electrodynamic units to electromagnetic units, hence exposing the speed of light directly. On connecting Weber’s ratio to the dielectric constant in an all-pervading elastic solid, Maxwell concluded that light consists in the transverse undulations of the same medium that is the cause of electric and magnetic phenomena. The differing perspectives of Weber and Maxwell can be reconciled by linking the speed of light to the circumferential speed of the electric particles surrounding the tiny molecular vortices that Maxwell believed to be the constituent units of the luminiferous medium. If we consider these molecular vortices to be tiny electric current circulations, mutually aligned along their rotation axes to form magnetic lines of force, magnetic repulsion can then be explained in terms of centrifugal pressure acting sideways from these field lines. And if these molecular vortices should take the more precise dipolar form of an electron and a positron in mutual orbit, we can then further explain magnetic attraction, this time in terms of the more fundamental electrostatic force being channeled along the double helix of electrons and positrons that forms a magnetic line of force.

Durch die FDA verboten und verbrannt!
»Die Orgonenergie gibt es nicht«  urteilte ein US-Richter 1954 nach jahrelanger verleum-derischer Medienhetze zugunsten des FDA-Klageverfahrens und ordnete die Zerstörung aller Bücher und Veröffentlichungen an, in denen das verbotene Wort »Orgon« vorkam. Dr. Reich erhielt später eine Freiheitsstrafe und starb im Gefängnis. Ein Justizskandal, dessen Hinter-gründe, ebenso wie die Wahrheit über Dr. Reichs Leben und Werk, bis heute verschwiegen oder falsch dargestellt werden.
In diesem Buch präsentiert der Naturwissen-schaftler und  vormalige Universitätsprofessor James DeMeo die Fakten über Reichs Ent-deckungen zur Lebensenergie und bezieht sich hierbei insbesondere auch auf seine eigenen umfangreichen Erfahrungen und Forschungs-arbeiten. Sein Hauptaugenmerk gilt dabei dem umstrittenen Orgonenergieakkumulator, dem weltweit genutzten Instrument einer wahrhaft energetischen Medizin. 
DeMeo vermittelt uns alles über die Herstellung von Orgonakkumulatoren und Orgondecken aus einfachen und überall erhältlichen Materialien, mit deren Hilfe die blauleuchtende, unbegrenzt verfügbare Lebensenergie aus der Atmosphäre konzentriert und genutzt werden kann. Wir erfahren außerdem wichtige Details zur sicheren Anwendung orgonakkumulierender Geräte in unserer heutigen Zeit und lernen Wissenswertes über Orgon-energiefunktionen in der Natur, wie z.B. im lebensenergiereichen lebenden Wasser natürlicher Heiß- und Mineralquellen, deren Heilkraft wir uns in unseren Kurbädern bedienen, und vieles mehr.
Mit vielen Abbildungen, aus-führlichem Literaturnachweis und Stichwortregister, weiter-führenden Internetverweisen und einem Anhang über den kosmischen Äther.

In a previous paper we outlined a series of historical touchpoints between classical aether theories and modern theoretical physics which showed a shared conceptual lineage for the modern tools and methods of the most common interpretations and fluid based "Hydrodynamic" treatments of an electromagnetic medium. It was proposed that, though the weight of modern experimentation leaves an extremely narrow and convoluted window for even a reconceptualization of a medium, all of modern physics recognizes a plethora of behaviors and attributes for free space and these physics are interchangeable with modern methods for treating superfluid-like continuums. Thus the mathematical equivalence of the methods do not comprise alternative physics but an alternative interpretation of the same physics. Though many individual components describing a "neo-aether" or "quintessence" are available, an overarching structural outline of how these tools can work together to pr...

The legacy analysis of the transverse arm of the Michelson-Morley type of experiments is found to be incorrect. The transverse arm has a time delay independent of the experiment velocity through space. This requires reanalysis of time dilation and length contraction described in special relativity and Lorentz aether theory.

This is a condensed derivation searching for a basis for a naturally explainable physics. Based on old findings of well-known
scientists, the basics of physics are questioned and rearranged. From the real understanding of the field constants and impedance of the vacuum, fundamental natural relationships could be recognized, which show that the dogma of empty space may be questioned.

Il lavoro presenta una rassegna dei punti essenziali della teoria della relatività speciale di Einstein, approfondendo le fasi precedenti alla sua formulazione ed accennando anche ad alcuni suoi aspetti che, specialmente lungo il corso dei primi decenni del secolo scorso, hanno suscitato interpretazioni controverse, riviste alla luce delle più recenti pubblicazioni nel settore. Dopo un'introduzione generale alla tesi, nella quale vengono presentati per sommi capi la materia e gli scopi dell'opera, nel primo capitolo si accenna ai presupposti storici ed epistemologici dell'articolo di Einstein del 1905. Vengono esposte le principali problematiche concettuali della fisica classica, così come presentatesi nel corso della storia: ad esempio, l'incompatibilità tra il principio galileiano di addizione delle velocità e la costanza della velocità di propagazione di un'onda elettromagnetica piana, ottenuta dalle equazioni di Maxwell. Sono citate anche alcune esperienze che usualmente vengono assunte come riconoscimento della teoria, tra le quali, come caso storico, quella di Michelson-Morley sulla rivelazione del “vento d'etere”, che suscita problematiche ancora attuali. Si accenna, infine, ai contributi dei vari studiosi sulla formulazione del pensiero del fisico tedesco, in particolare a quelli di H. Poincaré. Nel secondo capitolo, si passa ad esporre la formulazione dei due postulati sui quali si basa la teoria, seguendo il ragionamento dello stesso Einstein, corredato da alcune testimonianze estratte da appunti didattici e dalla lettura di conferenze da lui tenute. Un paragrafo importante viene dedicato al concetto della simultaneità e delle trasformazioni di Lorentz, alla luce di considerazioni epistemologiche (ad esempio, Reichenbach) e di considerazioni recenti e presenti in letteratura sul concetto di simultaneità, ove si evidenza come il ragionamento sulla simultaneità di Einstein vada considerato anche sotto ipotesi non balistiche di propagazione dei segnali luminosi, con correzioni opportune per l'effetto Doppler. Inoltre, si fa notare come le trasformazioni di Lorentz mutino di significato a seconda che le si consideri all'interno del paradigma della fisica classica (trasformazioni di Voigt), o di quello della fisica relativistica. Nel primo caso, si tratta della correlazione di due eventi distinti (fronti d'onda), nel secondo, del medesimo evento rappresentato da due sistemi di riferimento inerziali distinti. Il garante dell'unicità dell'evento, in relatività speciale, è l'invarianza dell'intervallo spazio-temporale, che mostreremo non potersi ricavare in modo chiaro solo dai due postulati di Einstein. Si tratta quindi di considerare esplicitamente all'interno della teoria le considerazioni sul rapporto di casualità nei diagrammi di Minkowski dello spazio-tempo. Sia che si parli di casualità assoluta (simultaneità metrica), di invarianza dell'intervallo, o di unicità dell'evento, si postula sempre una terza relazione tra gli eventi fisici (l'invarianza dell’intervallo relativistico) per giungere alle trasformazioni di Lorentz, nell'interpretazione relativistica. Non si potrà poi non dedicare una qualche attenzione alle conferme sperimentali della teoria, descritte storicamente e quantitativamente, nonché ad alcuni fraintendimenti concettuali suscitati, in alcuni casi (paradosso dei gemelli ed equivalenza massa-energia), da tali esperienze. Il terzo capitolo verte invece su alcune considerazioni epistemologiche alla teoria, evidenziando le posizioni “operazioniste” di P. W. Bridgman e “relazionali” di E. Cassirer. Si accennerà, inoltre, all'argomento, sempre centrale, della teoreticità dell'osservazione, nonché del dialogo tra fisica e metafisica, che influenza giocoforza i programmi di ricerca teorici e sperimentali. Dopo le conclusioni, segue una sezione appendice, che raccoglie alcune utili dimostrazioni correlate agli argomenti esposti, e la bibliografia finale, relativa a titoli di approfondimento e di ampliamento della materia trattata, sia fisici che filosofici.

Although Maxwell’s most important equations had already appeared throughout his seminal paper entitled “On Physical Lines of Force” , which was written in 1861, it was not until 1864 that Maxwell created a distinct listing of eight equations in his follow up paper known as “A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field” . This was in a section headed as ‘General Equations of the Electromagnetic Field’. While Maxwell refers to twenty equations at the end of this section, there are in fact only eight equations as such. Maxwell arrives at the figure of twenty because he splits six of these equations into their three Cartesian components. Maxwell’s eight original equations,

Jtotal = Jconduction + ∂D/∂t                                                                        (A)
∇×A = μH                                                                                                          (B)                                                                             
∇×H = Jtotal                                                                                                      (C)                                                                       
E = μv×H − ∂A/∂t − ∇ψ                                                                                    (D)                                                               
D = eE                                                                                                                (E)                                                                                   
E = RJconduction                                                                                            (F)                                                                             
∇∙D = ρ                                                                                                              (G)                                                                                   
∇∙J + ∂ρ/∂t = 0                                                                                                  (H)               

will be discussed in depth in individual sections throughout this paper.

This brief, systematic summary, designed as a map, will familiarize the reader through quotations with one of the greatest minds of our history; Nikola Tesla's life and work.
Navigation in the document works in web and word format only. Please visit the home page for it.

Experiment of controlled changes of the rate of time flow inside of experimental setup. Dr. Vadim A. Chernobrov and Alexander V. Frolov organized testing of experimental setup to measure changes of rate of time in this setup. Mechanical and electronic chronometers were used to detect changes of the time flow parameter inside of the setup.

Aleph is the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet and a symbol of the Holy Palace. It extends into the letter Yodh which is number 10 of the Hebrew alphabet. These 10 are the "Dibburim"-(words or sayings) of Genesis in the "Let there be Light" monologue. They are also known as the 10 commandments and were finally termed "middot" or "attributes" by conservative schools and "sefiroth" by liberal neo-orthodoxy groups. They were conceptualized by Kabbalists as 10 components of the Creation that play a role in the creation of the spiritual heavens and earth. When they are activated, Ruach dwells in the Most Holy Place known as Makom. Tav, is the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet it also symbolizes the entire material creation as a container and receptacle for the unlimited, unmeasurable, unseen Energy of Elohim. From Aleph, Ruach flows through the attributes and emanates the ALL. Nothing can contain the ALL except TAV without TAV nothing would exist in this material world we live in. TAV receives all the Aleph Energy that nothing material can contain. Tav receives Sheen and sends back data to Aleph, which initiates motion and animation in the spiritual invisible creation.

MANKIND’S MOST IMPORTANT TECHNOLOGY!! --→
SKIP DIRECTLY TO MIND OVER MATTER. 
BECOME THE GOD THAT YOU ARE!!!

EUPHORIA, TELEPATHIC MOMENTS, HOMAGE BY NATURE, WEATHER CONTROL AND ALCHEMY / MANIFESTATION ARE NORMAL NOW AND WE'VE ONLY JUST BEGUN.

<quote> “I believe that I have really found the relationship between gravitation and electricity, assuming that the Miller experiments are based on a fundamental error. Otherwise, the whole relativity theory collapses like a house of cards.”<unquote> — Albert Einstein, letter to Robert Millikan, June 1921. 

By conventional physics, we are informed in every textbook that the cosmic ether of space is an archaic theory once widely held, but was discarded after Michelson-Morley failed to detect it in 1887, with their new optical interferometer device. We are instructed, they obtained only a “null” or “zero” result. Nearly every student and professor today knows this, and repeats it as gospel. 

But is this narrative true? 

(Article continues at weblink: https://principia-scientific.org/part-1-the-dynamic-ether-of-cosmic-space-correcting-a-major-error-in-modern-science)

Michelson-Morley did in fact detect a small but significant ether-drift velocity, as clearly stated in their original 1887 publication. They wrote: 

<quote>“…the displacement [of interference fringes] to be expected was 0.4 fringe. The actual displacement was certainly less than a twentieth part of this [0.02 fringe], and probably less than a fourtieth part [0.01 fringe]. …the relative velocity of the earth and ether is probably less than one-sixth the earth’s orbital velocity, and certainly less than one-fourth”. <unquote> (Michelson-Morley, Am. J. Sci. No.203, Vol.XXXIV Nov.1887, p.341. Brackets added) 

With the Earth’s orbital velocity at around 30 km/sec, that one-sixth or one-fourth fraction, of what was “to be expected”, would place the measured ether-drift maximum at something approaching, or between a ~5 to ~7.5 km/sec velocity. 

That velocity was low by the standards of the static-ether theory of Newton, which anticipated up to several hundred km/sec for both Earth’s orbital and the solar system’s combined motions within a presumed static-ether galaxy.

Such a ~5 to ~7.5 km/sec maximum velocity, however, was agreeable with a material and partially Earth-entrained and slowed-down cosmic ether, which dynamically moves with the Earth, close to the velocity of the Earth itself. The effect is somewhat similar to how water flowing inside a pipe has a frictionally-reduced velocity close to the interior surface of the pipe. Or how a ball (“Earth”) floating on a river, or caught in a whirlpool, is carried along at the same velocity as the water.  (Article continues at weblink: https://principia-scientific.org/part-1-the-dynamic-ether-of-cosmic-space-correcting-a-major-error-in-modern-science)

EARTH SHATTERING  -  FIRST EVER PICTURES OF LIGHT AS A PARTICLE AND A WAVE  -  WHICH CLEARLY SHOWS THAT EVEN LIGHT IS ORGANIZED IN LAYERS - 2-D LAYERS.

THIS ALSO FITS WITH THE WAY CONSCIOUSNESS ACQUIRES INFO - QUOTING ANNA BREYTENBACH, "IN 3 SECONDS OF SHARED AWARENESS, WE CAN KNOW EACH OTHER FULLY.  PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE."  THE IMAGES AND INFO IN ALL LAYERS IS ORGANIZED EXACTLY THE SAME AND IS EASILY ASSIMILATED  -  OBVIOUSLY.

IS HAPPENING DUE TO BUBBLE TECH

THERE HAVE BEEN SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES BEFORE IN THE NATURE OF LIGHT!!!  -  ANOTHER ONE IN THE FORM OF A DREAM TIME /  GOLDEN AGE APPROACHES – WHICH ACTUALLY IT’S A EUPHORIC LT PURPLE AGE REALLY AND IT IS UNSTOPPABLE.  A FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE IN THE ENTIRETY OF CREATION I.E. THE ELIMINATION OF DUALITY VIA EUPHORIA IS HAPPENING AND WILL CONTINUE UNTIL EVERYTHING IS ENLIGHTENED. 
https://www.academia.edu/41144909/SYSTEM_WIDE_CHANGE_EUPHORIA 

THE ENTIRETY OF CREATION IS CHANGING – EUPHORIA IS EXPUNGING THE DUALITY OF FEAR & LOVE – EVEN IN THE AETHERS 
https://www.academia.edu/44044980/THE_ARTIST_S_GUIDE_TO_5D 
https://www.academia.edu/44420500/5D_EUPHORIC_TEAMS_THE_ARTISTS_VISION

THE ILLUSION OF TIME VIDEO IS A DEPICTION OF AN IDEA THAT EINSTEIN HAD  -  THE FIRST PART OF WHICH IS RIGHT ON THE MONEY.  HERE YOU GET TO SEE PRETTY MUCH HOW EVERYTHING MIRROFS OFF WITHIN THE AETHERS. THE AETHERS ARE A LOVE BASED COMMUNICATON SYSTEM, HALL OF MIRRORS, AS YOU WILL SEE.

James Clerk Maxwell is credited with having brought electricity, magnetism, and optical phenomena, together into one unified theory. The details of what exactly he did were however seriously distorted in twentieth century physics textbooks. Maxwell is most famous in connection with a set of equations which bear his name, but these equations have been totally removed from the physical context within which Maxwell was working, and outside of that physical context the full meaning of these equations is lost. Maxwell was working within the context of a sea of tiny aethereal vortices pressing against each other with centrifugal force. The centrifugal force bit was crucial for explaining magnetic repulsion, yet both centrifugal force and aether are stringently denied by modern physicists who nevertheless continue to hail Maxwell for the equations that he derived by using these very concepts which they deny. This irony seems to be explained at least in part because they think that the equations can be re-derived using Einstein's special theory of relativity. Such an erroneous belief stems from the fact that one of the most important of Maxwell's equations has been wrongly credited to Lorentz and referred to as the Lorentz force law and treated as 'supplementary' to Maxwell's equations. Einstein, being ignorant of Maxwell's original equations and the fact that they contained the Lorentz force law, hence wrongly believed that the equations contained no convective term, and so he made the erroneous conclusion that Maxwell's equations mean that the speed of light must be frame independent in contradiction of classical principles of vector addition of velocities. This erroneous conclusion led Einstein to his special theory of relativity in 1905, and it subsequently led to the erroneous belief amongst both relativists and many anti-relativists, that Einstein's special theory of relativity follows naturally from Maxwell's theory, when in fact Maxwell and Einstein were not even remotely working along the same lines.

PHYSICS HAS YET TO TOGGLE TO THE MOST OBVIOUS HEXAGONAL AETHERS ON WHICH OUR LOCAL REALITY IS PRINTED.

THE AETHERS ARE FIRST HALF CIRCLES, THEN CIRCLES, THEN SQUARES, THEN RECTANGLES (DUE TO THE RUSH OF TIME), PENTAGONAL, HEXAGONAL, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 & 12 SIDED AETHERS – THE REFLECTIONS OF WHICH ARE VISIBLE HERE ON EARTH WITH THE NAKED EYE – IN SO SHAPED NATURALLY OCCURRING FORMS

I AM JUST BUZZING LIKE A KID  -  HERE WE HAVE DETAILED PHOTOS OF MATTER GOING FROM 3D TO 2D.  INTERESTINGLY DEMATERIALIZATION SEEMS TO SKIP A STEP AS IT MAKES THE QUANTUM SHIFT FROM MATTER TO IT’S COHERENT IMAGE.
EVERYTHING STARTS AS A SEED / IDEA / IMAGE IN CHAOTIC DARKNESS.

The historical ether-drift experiments of Michelson-Morley, Dayton Miller and others yielded positive results for an ether wind and light-speed variations of 5 to 18 kilometers per second. Academic bias and erasure has misrepresented these facts for over 120 years, to the point that few dare question today. Scientist James DeMeo reviews the original documents and archives, exposing the facts which demolish nearly all of the post-ether astrophysical theories, including Einstein's relativity, the "big bang", "black holes" and quantum magic. Cosmic ether exists and moves in a creative gravitational spiral vortex, as the long-sought prime mover and life-energy. A must-read item for the professional scientist, educated layperson and student, in ordinary language with minimal maths.
Author DeMeo goes well beyond merely recounting the historical record and suppression of positive evidence favoring the cosmic ether.  In this book he also presents new evidence for a cosmic life-energy, functionally identical to cosmic ether, for the open-minded to consider.  For example:
Part I, Cosmic Ether as Theory and Experimentally Confirmed Fact, includes 8 different chapters which firstly introduces the concept of ether, then details the late 18th and 19th Century experimenters who made its detection by increasingly sophisticated instruments. The interferometer experiments of Dayton Miller are introduced, exposing facts by direct quotations from their publications in mainstream science journals, of multiple positive detections of the ether.  In most every case, from the early to the more recent ether-drift experiments, the cosmic axis of Earth's motion in space, in right ascension and declination were in close agreement with the Sun's motion through the galaxy, towards the star Vega.  These experiments provide evidence violating a major starting assumption for Einstein's theory of relativity, showing that light speed is variable, depending upon direction in the cosmos.
Part II, The Empire Strikes Back: Erasure, Mystification and Falsification of History, covers the rise of Alber Einstein's theory of relativity, and how he and his supporters managed to obscure and ignore the positive outcomes of the various ether-drift experiments. It also details the unethical "hatchet-job" against Dayton Miller's ether research, years after his death, by Einstein sycophant Robert Shankland, whose paper is still cited today as "definitive proof against Miller's ether-drift findings".  That, it most certainly was not! Einstein's originally friendly, but later dismissive treatment of Miller is detailed, including his many statements in private letters wherein he expressed deep concern that, if Miller's work was correct, then his theory of relativity would "collapse like a house of cards".
Part III, Into New Territory: Additional Evidence for a Material, Motional and Dynamic Ether, I overview findings from different disciplines, for a biologically-active and water-reactive cosmic life-energy.  These findings are very agreeable to those of the ether-drift scientists, who postulated a material entrained ether.  Additional direct evidence for the cosmic ether and ether-wind, by other names are discussed, showing they all have cosmic motions nearly identical to the older ether-drift findings: the interstellar wind, dark matter wind, cosmic ray wind, neutrino wind, and so forth.  The implications for these collective findings are then discussed, indicating how modern astrophysical theory has diverged from empirical astronomy, to embrace multiple mystical theories in an increasingly complicated manner.  A return to a dynamic cosmic ether, in its real-world dynamic and spiral-form motion, provides a singular explanation for multiple cosmic phenomena, where currently there are dozens.  All the post-ether astrophysical theories are shown to be mired in mysticism and unproven assumptions, even while empirical astronomy and space science engineering proceeds with new discovery nearly every day. 
The Dynamic Ether of Cosmic Space provides over 100 photos and graphical illustrations, with a full published reference and web-reference section, index and two Appendices.  It is developed for the educated layperson and student, but most scientific professionals will find it refreshing, as most of them were never taught about the factual ether-drift discoveries in their own textbooks!

The Dynamic Ether of Cosmic Space: Correcting a Major Error in Modern Science.  Available from most on-line booksellers, including: 
http://www.naturalenergyworks.net

THIS PAPER HAS BEEN TESTED BY KINESIOLOGY AND DOWSING AND FOUND TO BE THE BEST KNOWN EXPLANATION OF HOW THIS UNIVERSE IS CONSTRUCTED.  AND TWO PhDs HAVE SAID THAT IT IS A NOBEL PRIZE  -  WHEN ADDED TO THE OTHER FINE DETAILS ESSAYS, THE FULL EXTENT OF MANIFESTATION OF MATTER HOLOGRAPHICALLY FROM THE 2-D MIND OF GOD IS LAID OUT VERY CLEARLY.

BLESSINGS,
MIKE

This book presents a new approach to Relativity Theory (RT) and Quantum Mechanics (QM). The main motivation for this work is that RT and QM appear to be incompatible with one another. In addition, a number of physically important cases and well-documented experiments cannot be ex-plained within the framework of those two theories.

The existence of the electromagnetic aether is argued from two standpoints. Conceptual, based on the nature of physical waves. And practical: the various experiments that demonstrate it. Possible reasons for the strange nullification of the positive 1887 Michelson-Morley aether-wind result are discussed.

In the paper entitled “Proposing a Reintroduction of Aether into the Scientific Debate,” published on Academia.org on 20 April 2021, [1] the author concluded that there is enough evidence to suggest that both electromagnetic radiation (light) and matter are waves within a ‘substrate’. To maintain continuity with earlier scientific theories on the propagation of light, the substrate was termed ‘aether.’ Within this context however, aether is not only the medium through which light propagates as waves, but it is also the medium through which ‘ponderable matter’ propagates as waves. It is termed the ‘Fluid Elastic Aether.’ (FEA)
This paper develops the concepts of ‘matter waves’ and the associated concepts of mass and gravity. The properties of the fluid elastic aether are also developed. The implications of the findings on the concepts of inertia and momentum are also discussed, which leads to the conclusion that the FEA model can account for the motion of stars in spiral galaxies, which obviates the need for dark matter.

Based on old findings of well-known scientists, the basics of physics are questioned and rearranged. From the real understanding of the field constants and impedance of the vacuum, fundamental natural relationships could be recognized, which show that the dogma of empty space may be questioned.

Without contradiction to the purely abstract ideas of relativity and quantum physics, the observed physical foundations are explained by natural processes and real forces. This results in the natural explanations for gravity, the basis of mass, mass inertia including relativistic mass, kinetic energy, and the forces of electrostatics. The findings from these models are so overwhelming that it can be said with certainty that a medium exists.

The Lorentz transformations are best known for the relativistic Lorentz factor, γ = 1/√(1 – v^2/c^2), which appears in the equations of special relativity, and it is also known that the Lorentz transformations can be used to derive both the Biot-Savart law in the form B = γv×E/c^2, and the magnetic force in the form E = γv×B.
      It could therefore be argued that magnetism is a relativistic effect, even though it is observed at laboratory speeds. This article will now examine how the physical structure of the luminiferous medium enables the existence of magnetism. The aim will be to identify the latent presence of the speed of light within the fabric of a laboratory magnetic field. On establishing this, the Lorentz factor will then be exposed as an asymptotic coefficient which only becomes significant at speeds close to the speed of light.

This article proves that the electrostatic and gravitational forces exerted between two electrons are closely related. For example, these two forces can be expressed as related linear and nonlinear effects in nearly identical equations. The vast difference between the electron’s electrostatic and gravitational forces is due to the electron’s wave amplitude term raised to two different powers. This unification was found by adopting John Wheeler’s “quantum foam” model of the quantum vacuum and modeling an electron as a rotating wave in this medium.  This rotating wave model of an electron is shown to achieve an electron’s approximate energy and de Broglie wave characteristics while exhibiting no detectable volume. Also, ħ/2 quantized angular momentum gives this electron model wave-particle duality characteristics. It is possible to go directly to Section 12 (page 16) to see the equations that prove the close relationship between the electron’s gravitational and electrostatic forces.

If we go on-line and just type “Einstein’s Train” on search engine, it will pop-up about 13 million articles related to that topic proving about enormous popularity of Einstein’s “thought” experiment.
The problem is that “Einstein’s Train” doesn’t have neither scientific, nor experimental significance, it is not even experiment at all, it cannot be realized practically because is based on vicious circle logic.

Albert Einstein’s theory of special relativity stems from the constancy of the speed of light, regardless of the speed of an observer. In addition, the theory of special relativity postulates that it is impossible to define absolute speeds. The speed of a body always needs to be specified as being relative to some other body. Time is also found to be relative between two observers moving relative to each other. In particular, as the speed of an observer increases, time dilates relative to a ‘stationery’ observer. In this paper, it is postulated that all these characteristics of relativity theory are inherent in all wave systems when the measurement of time and distance is made utilizing measuring instruments that are themselves waves within those systems. A wave existential reference frame is defined as a way of formalizing this concept. Based on these findings, it is postulated that ‘rigid matter’ is part of the electromagnetic wave existential reference frame and suggests that space is not vacant as proposed by Einstein but is composed of an aether that is the fundamental fabric of the universe.

This work is a synthesis of functional aether theories produced in the 19th century by pioneers in electrodynamics including Tesla, Russel, Steinmetz, Heaviside, and others. It dispels the nihilistic, materialistic, and inherently atheistic theories which have held reign over middle earth’s citizens entire cosmological and physical system for centuries; the heliocentric, atomistic, and and relativistic theories from the time of Democritus to that of Lorentz and Einstein. The mathematical and metaphysical conjugate theories from which stem from the experimental and theoretical efforts of their predecessors; Faraday, Maxwell, Huygens, Newton, Ptolemy, Aristotle, and Pythagoras. An exploration into suppressed, ancient, timeless advanced cosmological concepts and metaphysical systems is also presented. It must be noted that prior to approaching the content within this book, the reader must understand that a new physical and cosmological model may only be presented, let alone accepted, after errors and shortcomings of the current leading models are addressed. It is my hope that in this process, as the fat is trimmed; uncertainties polished away, the absolute truth shall stand in its raw glory. This in turn renders the formulation of a new model passive, as the outcome of reductionism always stands firm in its foundations. All one must do is interpret it with discernment and without any preconceptions, mental sedimentations, or other forms of prejudice. The conceptual principles of this work may seem extraneous, extreme, or outright incorrect at times, but it is urged that the reader pay mind to the experimental foundation of same, which herein stands before the former. Only through juxtaposing theory and experience, while yielding to no mental autoimmunity that would otherwise inhibit one from pondering this information without external projections and preconceptions, will the truth present itself. The reader must embrace their sense of rationality and logic. Once armed with strong discernment and disinterestedness, one may begin to read this book. Avoiding all attachment; either to the ideas presented herein or to your own. Reading something that affirms one’s set of beliefs and as a consequence understanding them deeply and hence becoming intelligible in that material is to be intelligent. However, wisdom is a different crop to cultivate. Intelligence, as wisdom, requires the intake of new information. What must take precedent in the latter is the abolition of the brick wall of ignorance that many of us hold between our hearts and our minds; because to truly believe and inner-stand anything which contradicts and imperatively overthrows one’s own beliefs, one must feel that change toward truth in their heart before they even read the material. This is granted they are neither put off by its appearance nor experience conflict when first approaching it. Thus, when looking to entertain the ideas in this book, the reader should first focus on the quantitative, empirical information laid out herein, so to dispel any baseless preconceptions. Only subsequently should they interpret the qualitative, philosophical concepts. This is so that an emphasis is placed on the importance of experimental data in the formulation of theoretical hypotheses; something that, although impersonated far and wide as such, is not common practice among high-ranking academic institutions and other organizational bodies of knowledge of today. Most scientists of today, as Tesla is quoted saying, are very smart, and may think deeply, but they can’t think clearly. They are able to compute complex integrals, differential equations, and other forms of arithmetic to describe theoretical phenomena; such as that of curved space,—of which Tesla was an adamant critic— and despite being ultimately perplexed, even mesmerized by the counter-intuitiveness and lack of experimental basis for that which they believe; as also evident in many physics forums, university classrooms, and even lectures from so-called ‘experts’ in this field, very few of today’s scientists can muster the willpower or philosophical tenure to question it. Pre-Print: 01/01/ 2022 Publish Date: 08/08/2024

Electromagnetic properties of materials are central to our technologically advanced society. Despite this ubiquitous use of electricity, there are many fundamental questions that remain unanswered. Principal amongst these are questions relating to the true nature of charge and magnetism.

It was noted that “force fields” appear to be created when electrical charge and magnets were being manipulated. The equations of Maxwell and other associated models, that give us the ability to design electrical equipment, were developed by recording the largely force based responses of measuring instruments in the vicinity of other materials that were electrically stimulated in different ways. As such, the current models used for electricity and magnetism are based on empirical models, rather than being built from theoretical foundations. The current ‘standard model’ of physics therefore has a very heavy reliance on the electrical and magnetic models but is unable to link these with the theory of general relativity (TGR) which is the leading model for explaining gravity.

Theoretical models are developed to explain electrical and magnetic phenomena within the framework of the fluid elastic aether (FEA) theory. It is believed that within the framework of the FEA theory lies the ability to explain all the particles and forces included in the standard model as well as the principles of general relativity.

"The ether-drift experiments of Dayton Miller (c.1906-1929) using a highly sensitive Michelson lightbeam interferometer, demonstrated systematic positive effects. Subsequent work by Michelson-Pease-Pearson (1929), Galaev (2001-2002) and others have experimentally confirmed Miller's result, which suggests: 1) the cosmological ether is substantive with a slight mass, and may be blocked or reflected by dense material surroundings, 2) Earth-entrainment occurs, and the best detections are made at high-altitude locations. 3) Miller's
computed axis of Earth's net motion of ether-drift is in close agreement with findings from diverse disciplines, including from biology and physics, regarding ether-like phenomena with similar sidereal-day and seasonalsidereal fluctuations. Neither an intangible static, or even a tangible entrainable but stagnant ether appear reconcilable with such results. A dynamic ether acting as cosmic "prime mover" is the alternative solution, but requires the ether to have both slight mass and specific motions in space. A solution is found in the bioenergetic
research of Wilhelm Reich (1934-1957) who demonstrated an energy continuum with distinct biological and meteorological
properties, existing in high vacuum, interactive with matter, reflected by metals, and with selfattracting  (ie., gravitational) spiral-form streaming motions. Giorgio Piccardi (c.1950-1970) and his followers also demonstrated a metal-reflectable solar-modulated energy affecting the physical chemistry of water, chemical reactions and radioactive decay rates, correlated to Earth's spiral-form motion through cosmic space. More recent research on the annual variation in "dark matter wind" also shows very similar velocity shifts associated
with Earth's spiral-form motion around the moving Sun, suggesting "dark matter" is a misunderstood substitute
for a dynamic and substantive cosmological ether."

THE AETHERS ARE THERE  -  YOU'LL SEE LOTS OF PICTURES OF THEM.

THE MICHAELSON MORLEY EXPERIMENT WAS WELL DESIGNED, JUST POORLY OBSERVED  -  IT HAS BEEN RE-RUN BY RESEARCHERS, THAT YOU'LL SEE HEREIN.  AND IT WAS RE-RUN BY DAYTON MILLER (EINSTEIN KNEW THAT THIS SUCCESSFUL EXPERIMENT CANCELED RELATIVITY) AND BY ERNEST SILVERTOOTH ON BEHALF OF THE U.S. AIR FORCE WITH THE POSITIVE RESULTS POSTED IN "NATURE".

THE FACT THAT THE AETHERS ARE THERE CANCELS ALL OF PHYSICS SINCE 1887, BECAUSE OF THE MICHAELSON MORELY EXPERIMENT THE ROOT PRECEPT OF PHYSICS BECAME THAT EM WAVES PROPAGATE THRU A VACUUM, WHICH IS NOT TRUE.  BECAUSE THE AETHERS ARE THERE, THEN EVERYTHING MANIFESTS WITHIN THEM, THAT IS INESCAPABLE.

DITTO RELIGION WHICH POSTULATES THAT GOD MADE US AND SET US FREE TO DO AS WE PLEASE  =  FREE WILL.  IN FACT, GOD MANIFESTS US AND EVERYTHING AROUND US EVERY MICROSECOND  - EVERYTHING BLINKS OUT OF THIS REALM, BACK TO THE IMAGE IN THE MIND OF GOD WHICH CAUSES IT ALL TO RE-MANIFEST HOLOGRAPHICALLY.

THERE IS AN EM SEQUENCE OF EVENTS THAT HAS TO OCCUR DURING THIS BLINK, WHICH IS WELL EXPLAINED IN "MIKE'S THEORY OF EVERYTHING" THENCE THE FINE DETAILS ESSAYS THAT NAIL IT DOWN  -  PARTICULARLY DUE TO THE CLEAR EXPLANATION OF THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE NUMBER 7 MANIFESTING THROUGHOUT NATURE.  HOWEVER, ONE MUST START WITH THE AETHERS  -  NOW YOU HAVE THEM.

THE AETHERS ARE A LOVING COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, WHICH ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PRECEPT OF QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND THE AMAZING EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS OF ASPECTS PROOF OF BELL'S THEOREM, WHICH SHOULD HAVE CHANGED ALL OF PHYSICS AS WELL AS HUMAN INTERACTIONS YEARS AGO  -  PHYSICS HAS LEAD HUMANITY IN THE WRONG DIRECTION I.E. INTO REDUCTIONISM AND MATERIALISM VS SPIRITUALITY, WHICH IT WAS HEADED THERE IN THE BEGINNING VIA THE OLD PHYSICISTS, BOHM, BOHR, PLANCK, HEISENBERG ETC.

BLESSINGS,
MIKE

This paper by William S. Alek deserves serious attention. It explores concepts related to "Free Energy" and the control of Gravity/Antigravity that are based entirely within the framework of extended classical Newtonian physics called Newtonian Torsion Physics. It is shown that the cause of gravity is a type of macroscopic torque between inertial frames where the origin of the torque occurs within imaginary or complex space. The effect manifests in real space as universal mass attraction, or gravity. A correlation has been discovered between mass, inductors, and capacitors, thereby relating the imaginary or complex origin of torque to gravity, and how this same torque affects electromagnetism.

Although the concept of absolute space was the product of Newton’s genius alone, it did have precursors in the philosophical concepts of space developed by Patrizi and Gassendi before him as well as a long history of changes, adaptations and challenges after him. The concept of space has always been controversial, no matter what its historical context. This essay traces the development of Newton’s concept of absolute space. The main theme revolves around the inherent problems with developing and advancing absolute space. These problems have historically followed two lines of development: theologically and physically oriented problems. The two lines have their beginnings in the spatial concepts of Patrizi (physical) and Gassendi (theological) and are combined in the Newtonian concept of absolute space which was only associated with God in Newton’s General Scholium to the Principia. Of the two categories, the physical problems are emphasized over the longer course of history since they have greater validity for the evolution of the concept of space. However, there is another inherent duality in the theoretical concept of space that cannot be ignored. Space can be interpreted as either a collection of infinite points, which can be neither measured nor detected, or as a group of three-dimensional extensions between and through bodies of matter that can be observed as well as precisely measured. Newton was the first person to make physical sense of these two geometrical interpretations of space and only related them to religious concepts and God when his physics was criticized by Leibniz and Berkeley. This essay has never been published as such, but its contents have been fully incorporated into the book “Phallacies of Fysics: Classical physics” and published therein.

One fundamental problem of modern physics is the search for a theory of everything able to explain the nature of space-time, what matter is and how matter interacts. There are various propositions, as Grand Unified Theory, Quantum Gravity, Supersymmetry, String and Superstring Theories, and M-Theory. However, none of them is able to consistently explain at the present and same time electromagnetism, relativity, gravitation, quantum physics and observed elementary particles. By developing a complete theory of the deformation of solid lattices using Euler’s coordinates, one finds that this one can be used for the description of the spatiotemporal evolution of the Universe instead of the general relativity. In this way, it is suggested that the Universe could be a massive elastic three-dimensional lattice described in the absolute space by using Euler’s coordinates, and that fundamental building blocks of Ordinary Matter could consist of topological singularities of this lattice, namely diverse dislocation loops, disclination loops and dispiration loops. One finds then, for an isotropic elastic lattice obeying Newton’s law, with specific assumptions on its elastic properties, that the behaviors of this lattice and of its topological defects display “all” known physics. Indeed, this theory of crystalline ether contains intrinsically and allows one to deduce directly the various formalisms of electromagnetism, special relativity, general relativity, gravitation and quantum physics. It allows also one to give simple answers to some longstanding questions of modern physics, as the universe expansion, the big-bang, the dark matter and the dark energy, the particle spins or the quantum decoherence. But it appears above all a completely new scalar charge, the curvature charge, which has no equivalence in the modern physical theories, which creates a very small deviation to the equivalence principle of Einstein between inertial mass and gravitational mass, and which allows one to give very simple explanations of the weak asymmetry observed between matter and anti-matter, the origin of the weak interaction force, the formation of galaxies, the disappearance of antimatter from the universe, the formation of gigantic black holes in the heart of the galaxies and the nature of the famous dark matter. Moreover, by describing in this third version the crytalline ether by a face-centered cubic lattice with axial symmetries, one was able to identify a lattice structure whose topological defect loops coincide exactly with the complex zoology of elementary particles, and which allows to explain physically and quite simply the nature of the weak and strong forces, the existence of three families in the standard model as well as the asymptotic behavior of the strong force. While in the second version an explanation of quantum decoherence was introduced, in this third version a crystalline ether of face-centered cubic structure was introduced, which allows to explain the three families of elementary particles of the Standard Model, as well as the strong force and its asymptotic behavior.