Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Different methods to analyze reactive oxygen species production

2011, Clinical Immunology

Clinical Immunology (2011) 138, 331–332 available at www.sciencedirect.com Clinical Immunology www.elsevier.com/locate/yclim Letter to the Editor Different methods to analyze reactive oxygen species production Dear Dr. Saxon, We read with interest the article by Mora et al. [1] in which they have shown low and non-regulatable (constitutive) levels of high affinity IgE receptors in neutrophils from asthmatic patients. The authors conclude that “anti-IgE antibody (Ab) did not stimulate any superoxide release by neutrophils”. Superoxide production was measured by the cytochrome c assay (cyt c). In agreement with Mora et al. we could not detect allergen-dependent superoxide production using the same method which is also in agreement with Sato et al. [3]. Despite the cytochrom c assay, we were able to detect reactive oxygen species (ROS) by using luminol-amplified chemiluminiscence (CL). In agreement with us, Daniels et al. and Wozniak et al. [4,5], were unable to detect O−2 production upon IL-8 stimulation by using cyt c assay, but they could detect it with CL as previously been shown by Walz et al. [6]. It was suggested that the discrepancy between the results from the two different assays was due to: ­ A greater sensitivity of the CL assay. ­ Luminol is a cell-permeable compound; thus, CL generated by this molecule reflects the production of both intracellular and extracellular ROS. However cytochrome c is a membrane non-permeable compound, measurement of cyt c reduction is also a widely used and accepted technique for the detection of extracellular superoxide generation alone. ­ The different specificity of these assays. Cyt c is specific for O−2 and therefore reflects the activity of NADPHoxidase alone, whereas luminol may be oxided by many different oxyradicals (O−2 , H2O2, HOCl, ˙OH and 1O2) and oxidants, and thus may reflect the activity ofcxx other radical-generating enzymes. This is relevant as Wang et al. have demonstrated that nitric oxide, produced by nitric oxide synthase, increases luminol-enhanced CL [7,8]. When we used luminol-amplified CL, anti-IgE and allergens stimulated respiratory burst in neutrophils from allergic patients in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Further- more, specific allergens were able to activate respiratory burst by neutrophils from allergic patients sensitized to allergens of the same type as those which produce clinical allergic symptoms. Nevertheless, when cells were incubated with allergens to which the patients were not sensitized, no respiratory burst was detected. Allergens were ineffective on neutrophils from healthy donors [2]. To evaluate the possible implication of ROS, mainly derived from neutrophil NADPH oxidase activity, in the IgE-dependent COX-2 expression, we first assessed the possibility of IgE-elicited activation of the NADPH oxidase complex taking place upon translocation of its cytosolic subunits, p47phox and p67phox, to the plasma membrane. The anti-IgE antibody induced a clear translocation to the plasma membrane of p47phox and p67phox, and there was a concomitant disappearance of these proteins from the cytosolic fraction. Also we found that after treatment with anti-IgE antibody or specific allergens, the enzyme complex was functionally active in the production of ROS and that its activation was cancelled by specific NADPH oxidase inhibitors [9]. As Mora et al. [1] refers that the level of COX-2 was correlated with the “production of intracellular superoxide”. We have indicated above that luminol-amplified CL assay (used by us) [2,9] can detect the production of both intracellular and extracellular ROS, but the cytochrome c assay (as used by Mora et al.) is known specifically to detect extracellular ROS production. The employ of two different techniques to analyze the ROS production can explain the differences of our results with that from Mora et al. Conflict of interest None of the authors has any potential financial conflict of interest related to this manuscript. References [1] J. Mora, E.K. Riggs, J. Fu, D.W. MacGlashan Jr., S.A. Fox, B. Yu, M.C. Tobin, L.L. Thomas, Expression of the high affinity IgE receptor by neutrophils of individuals with allergic asthma is both minimal and insensitive to regulation by serum IgE, Clin. Immol. 132 (2009) 132–140. [2] J. Monteseirín, M.J. Camacho, R. Montaño, E. Llamas, M. Conde, M. Carballo, P. Guardia, J. Conde, F. Sobrino, Enhacement of antigen-specific functional responses by neutrophils from allergic patients, J. Exp. Med. 183 (1996) 2571–2579. 1521-6616/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2010.12.003 332 [3] K. Sato, B. Zweiman, A.R. Moskovitz, C. von Allmen, A. Lane, P. C. Atkins, Effects of skin-chamber fluids from human allergic reactions on neutrophil activation, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 90 (1992) 21–31. [4] R.H. Daniels, M.J. Finnem, M.E. Hill, J.M. Lackie, Recombinant human monocyte IL-8 primes NADPH oxidase and phospholipase A2 activation in human neutrophils, Immunology 75 (1992) 157–163. [5] A. Wozniak, W.H. Betts, G.A. Murphy, M. Rokicinski, Interleukin8 primes human neutrophils for enhanced superoxide anion production, Immunology 79 (1993) 608–615. [6] A. Walz, F. Meloni, I. Clark-Lewis, V. von Tscharner, M. Baggiolini, [Ca2+]i changes and respiratory burst in human neutrophils and monocytes induced by NAP-1/interleukin-8, NAP-2, and gro/MGSA, J. Leukoc. Biol. 50 (1991) 279–286. [7] M. Baggiolini, P. Imboden, P. Detmers, Neutrophil activation and the effects of interleukin-8/neutrophil-activating peptide-1 (IL8/Nap-1), Cytokines 4 (1992) 1–17. [8] J.F. Wang, P. Komarov, H. Sies, H. De Groot, Contribution of nitric oxide sythase to luminol-dependent chemiluminiscence Letter to the Editor generated by phorbolester-activated Kupffer cells, J. Biochem. 279 (1991) 311–314. [9] A. Vega, P. Chacón, G. Alba, Bekay R. El, J. Monteseirin, J. Martín-Nieto, F. Sobrino, Modulation of IgE-dependent COX-2 gene expresión by reactive oxygen species in human neutrophils, J. Leukoc. Biol. 80 (2006) 152–163. Javier Monteseirín⁎ Antonio Vega Servicio Regional de Inmunología y Alergia, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain E-mail address: [email protected]. ⁎Corresponding author. c/Asunción 27, 3º Izda. 41011 Sevilla, Spain. 2 December 2010 Available online 13 January 2011