About the Author
Professor Dr Balasubramanian Thiagarajan MS D.L.O. Practising
otolaryngologist
Former professor and head Department of Otolaryngology
Government Stanley Medical College
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
1
Chennai.
Former
Registrar
The Tamilnadu Dr MGR Medical University
Guindy
Chennai
Currently:
Dean
Sri Lalithambigai Medical college
Maduravoil
Chennai
Email:
[email protected]
2
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
About the Book
This book has been authored with PhD scholars in mind. The author believes
that this would be a good starting point for these scholars. The following
chapters have been included:
Chapters:
1. Introduction to Thesis Writing
2. Choosing a Topic and Developing a Thesis Statement
3. Conducting Literature Review
4. Methodology and Data Collection
5. Writing the Introduction and Background of Your Thesis
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
1
6. Presenting Your Findings and Analysis
7. Writing the Discussion and Conclusion of Your Thesis
8. Formatting and Structuring Your Thesis
9. Referencing and Citations
10. Defending Your Thesis: Preparing for the Viva Voce
11. Revising and Editing Your Thesis
12. Time Management and Staying on Track
13. Overcoming Writer's Block and Staying Motivated
14. Using Technology and Tools to Enhance Your Thesis Writing Process
15. Publishing Your Thesis and Next Steps.
16. Data visualization
17. Statistical tools
This book also contains tips about choosing an ideal thesis topic. It also warns
the student about the various pitfalls involved in choosing a research topic.
The topic on referencing citations would be very useful for even a novice
researcher.
This book also introduces the researcher to the myriad of software tools that
are available to the scholar. Using these software tools would make the life of
the researcher that much easier.
2
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
The process of writing a finished piece of text involves several steps
including imagining what to write, creating an outline, drafting the
content, writing the full text, revising and rewriting, and presenting it
in a suitable form, including publishing. The process can be complex,
as it involves both intellectual and logistical challenges. The difficulties
can stem from permanent dilemmas or temporary issues that delay or
distract. While these difficulties may not be easy to solve, making them
more explicit can help us find solutions that others have found helpful. The aim of this book is to shed light on common writing challenges and offer solutions that can be useful.
Why do a PhD?
There are many reasons why someone might pursue a PhD degree.
Here are some of the most common motivations:
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
1
Introduction
1. Career advancement: A PhD degree can open up opportunities for
careers in academia, research, and other high-level positions that
require advanced knowledge and expertise.
2. Personal growth: Pursuing a PhD can be a challenging and
rewarding personal and intellectual journey that allows individuals to
delve deeply into a subject they are passionate about.
3. Making a contribution to knowledge: A PhD thesis is an
opportunity to contribute new knowledge to a field of study through
original research.
4. Financial benefits: In some fields, a PhD degree can lead to higher
earning potential and more competitive job opportunities.
5. Passion for research: Some individuals simply enjoy conducting
research and find the process of discovery and learning to be fulfilling
in and of itself.
It's important to carefully consider your motivations for pursuing a
PhD and to have a clear understanding of the time and effort involved
in completing the degree. A PhD is a significant commitment, both in
terms of time and resources, and it's important to be prepared for the
challenges that come with the process.
2
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
The Starting point:
The starting point of this book is to highlight the significance of
writing skills at the doctoral level. A thesis or dissertation is a crucial
component of PhD education in various disciplines within the
humanities and social sciences. The second part of the book focuses
on the various writing tasks involved in both the traditional and newer
models of PhD education. The third section examines a crucial skill
for effective writing, which is effectively managing the expectations of
your readers.
Writing is just one aspect of authoring. At the doctoral level, authoring
involves becoming a proficient academic writer with the potential to
be published. This involves acquiring a comprehensive set of writing
skills and practical knowledge that has been traditionally passed down
from mentors to students within university departments. A key theme
of this book is that authoring skills are essential for successfully
completing a doctorate. Authoring skills are crucial in constructing a
well-articulated and coherent argument for your thesis. A strong
authoring ability can also help you meet the requirements for
originality and making a significant contribution to your discipline,
which are crucial factors in obtaining a doctorate from reputable
universities. Developing these skills is essential in completing a
doctorate within a timely manner, avoiding the prolonged delays that
were once common among PhD students.
Despite the importance of authoring skills, they are not commonly
taught in universities. The knowledge involved has not been
systematically documented or taught. While students are heavily
trained in the substantive knowledge and research methods of their
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
3
Introduction
discipline, the teaching of authoring skills has been neglected. This is
partly due to the belief among academic staff that becoming an
effective writer is closely linked to being a good researcher and
understanding the subject matter of a particular discipline. Many
academics may doubt the usefulness of discussing generic authoring
skills outside of a specific discipline. As a result, most university
teachers and supervisors have limited resources to offer advice on
authoring skills to their students and must rely on their personal
experience as advisers or former PhD students. However, this neglect
of authoring skills is not universal. Academic journal editors and
university book publishers distinguish between a person's expertise in
their discipline and their writing proficiency. They recognize that a
good researcher may be a poor writer and vice versa. Nevertheless, the
prevailing belief in doctoral education is that if the research is sound,
the writing aspect will follow naturally.
Typical Approach:
The typical approach to teaching authoring skills in PhD education
assumes that students will rely on the study skills they gained in their
previous education, such as their undergraduate or master’s degree.
They are expected to learn to produce good writing through trial and
error, by constantly revising and improving their writing, starting with
research papers and eventually leading to their thesis. While they
receive individual guidance from their supervisors and colleagues, this
guidance is usually specific to their text and discipline and focuses on
the substance and legitimacy of arguments and expressions. Through
repeated interactions and feedback, students are supposed to gradually
4
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
develop their own sense of what can and cannot be said in their field
and how to communicate their ideas effectively.
Traditional Approach
The traditional approach to PhD education in which students learn
through a combination of research and discipline-specific knowledge
is still effective. However, it has been supplemented by more formal
and comprehensive instruction in recent times. Some students may
have the advantage of having supervisors who are skilled authors and
willing to spend time and effort to teach authoring skills through
individual work. Under these circumstances, the traditional approach
can still produce excellent results.
Conventional trial and error method:
The conventional method of students learning and developing
authoring skills through trial and error under the guidance of a
supervisor is often problematic. The demands of teaching, research,
publishing, and administration on university staff can cause this
method to fail. The cost and time involved in individual supervision
for doctoral students has led to a more formal and collective approach
to education, reducing the need for individual instruction. Some
supervisors may not be skilled writers or interested in helping their
students develop their authoring skills, leaving their students without a
source of guidance. This method can also be time-consuming and
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
5
Introduction
erratic, causing stress and anxiety for students and prolonging the time
it takes to complete a PhD. Informal methods can make the process of
becoming a competent author more difficult than necessary.
Difference between undergraduate and postgraduate thesis:
The main difference between undergraduate and postgraduate theses
is the level of depth and originality required. Both types of theses
follow a similar structure and require logical rigor. However, the
substance and focus of the research differs. A PhD thesis is expected
to make a substantial and original contribution to the field, while an
undergraduate thesis is evaluated based on research quality,
significance of contributions, and presentation style. Higher degree
theses, especially PhD, must include a comprehensive review of
related literature and clearly demonstrate original contributions.
Ultimately, a thesis, whether undergraduate or postgraduate,
demonstrates the candidate's ability to conduct independent research,
analyze and communicate their findings, and for higher degrees,
mastery of the relevant literature and originality.
Structure of thesis:
1. Title page: gives the title of the thesis in full, the candidate’s names
and degrees, a statement of presentation in the form This thesis is
presented for the degree of ------ University of -------, the department
and year of submission.
2. Summary or Abstract—of approximately 300 words. (It should not
exceed 700 words.) The Abstract or summary should summarize the
6
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
appropriate headings, aims, scope and conclusion of the thesis.
3. Table of Contents
4. Acknowledgments
5. Main Text
6. Bibliography or References
7. Appendices
The format of the undergraduate thesis is similar, except that the title
page is followed by a letter from the candidate addressed to the Executive Dean of the Faculty of relevant department saying that:
This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for
the degree of 'Master of surgery’ and certifying that it represents the
candidate’s own work.
The specific chapters that must be included in a thesis can vary
depending on the academic field, university guidelines, and type of
degree (e.g. undergraduate or postgraduate). However, some common
chapters found in many theses include:
1. Introduction: introduces the research question, background information, and objectives of the study.
2. Literature Review: provides an overview of previous research and
studies related to the research topic.
3. Methodology: outlines the methods and procedures used in conducting the research.
4. Results: presents the findings of the research, including data analysis
and interpretation.
5. Discussion: interprets the results and relates them to the objectives
and existing literature.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
7
Introduction
6. Conclusion: summarizes the main findings, highlights the contributions made, and suggests areas for future research.
7. References: lists the sources cited in the thesis.
8. Appendices: contains additional material such as graphs, tables, or
data sets that support the main text.
It is important to note that the required chapters for a thesis can vary,
and some fields may require additional chapters or sections to be
included. It is always advisable to consult the guidelines provided by
the university or academic institution for the specific requirements of
the thesis.
Importance of hypothesis in a thesis:
The hypothesis is a crucial component of a thesis. It provides
coherence and direction to the research. If you're having trouble
understanding the concept of a hypothesis, consider these definitions:
1. A hypothesis is a statement that outlines the aim or objective of an
experiment, and if it were true, we would expect certain observations
or measurements.
2. A hypothesis is an imaginative assumption of what might be true
that has verifiable and deductive consequences.
3. Hypotheses are the preliminary forms of theories.
8
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
4. Every useful experiment must have a specific objective or principle
to be established or rejected, and this anticipation is a hypothesis.
As stated by the French Physiologist Claude Bernard, "A hypothesis is
the mandatory starting point of all experimental reasoning. Without it,
no investigation is possible, and one would learn nothing, only
collecting barren observations." The hypothesis must align with
existing knowledge and be testable through experimentation. To meet
these criteria, it's necessary to have read the literature and conduct the
experiment. This is why the hypothesis is essential to scientific
investigation.
Lessons taught by Michelson-Morley experiment:
The Michelson-Morley experiment was a seminal experiment in the
history of physics, conducted in 1887 by American physicists Albert A.
Michelson and Edward W. Morley. The aim of the experiment was to
detect the presence of an "ether" in space, which was then believed to
be the medium for the propagation of light. The experiment involved
splitting a beam of light and directing it along two perpendicular arms,
then recombining the two beams and measuring any difference in their
arrival times. The result of the experiment was surprising and
puzzling, as there was no detectable difference in the arrival times of
the light beams, which suggested that there was no ether present. This
result became a cornerstone of the theory of relativity and played a key
role in the development of modern physics.
The Michelson-Morley experiment taught researchers several
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
9
Introduction
important lessons, including:
1. The absence of an ether: The experiment challenged the widely held
belief in the existence of an "ether" that was thought to permeate all of
space and provide the medium for the propagation of light. The null
result of the experiment, which showed no evidence of the ether, led
to a rejection of the ether hypothesis and the development of
alternative theories of light and space-time.
2. The theory of relativity: The experiment was a crucial piece of
evidence in support of the theory of special relativity, proposed by
Albert Einstein in 1905. Special relativity showed that the speed of
light is constant in all frames of reference and that the laws of physics
are the same for all observers in uniform relative motion.
3. The importance of precise measurements: The Michelson-Morley
experiment was notable for its high precision and accuracy, and it
demonstrated the importance of meticulous experimental work in
advancing scientific knowledge.
4. The role of experiment in scientific discovery: The experiment
showed that scientific theories must be tested through experiment and
that even long-held beliefs can be challenged by new data and
observations. The experiment serves as an example of the power of
empirical evidence to shape scientific thinking and advance our
understanding of the world.
If an experiment shows that a hypothesis is incorrect, then that
hypothesis must be erroneous, no matter how attractive. Moreover,
failure of a hypothesis may lead to a re-examination of assumptions,
10
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
refutation of shaky theories, and ultimately to new knowledge, as
happened in this case.
Michel Faraday's research diary could serve as a model for researchers.
In one of his many volumes of diaries, he included:
1. Hand-drawn diagrams of experimental setups, which should be
included in the researcher's record book, even if they are not works of
art.
2. Accurate descriptions of what he believed he was perceiving, such
as writing "It still smelt strongly of Electricity."
3. Questions he asked himself to clarify his thoughts and guide further
work, like "Can induction through air take place in curves or round a
corner?"
This diary serves as an example of recording observations accurately,
asking questions to clarify thoughts, and including experimental setups
in a researcher's record book.
In short, your laboratory notebook is where you document your ideas,
observations, and data, in a manner that captures their freshness and
clarity. Your experiments should be designed to test only one
hypothesis at a time, with multiple experiments contributing to a
broader overarching hypothesis. If your experiments have been
successful, the task of presenting them in a thesis format may seem
daunting. However, with careful planning, this too can be
accomplished.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
11
Introduction
Always write with the reader in mind:
“Successful communication requires both a sender (writer in written
communication) and a receiver (reader in written communication). By
considering the reader's perspective, your written communication is
more likely to be effective.” Hence the writer's writing technique
should match that or reader's expectations.
"Gopen and Swan's in their article provide a thorough introduction to
incorporating scientific method in scientific writing. They argue that
readers have implicit expectations about the content and order of
information in a sentence, and successful communication occurs when
the writer meets these expectations. If the expectations are not met,
misunderstandings or confusion can arise. The authors encourage
writers to write with the reader in mind, so the reader doesn't have to
spend effort trying to decipher the meaning. Despite the lack of a set
formula for good writing, the authors provide seven valuable generic
guidelines worth reiterating.”
Time taken to complete PhD:
The time it takes to complete a PhD varies depending on a number of
factors, including the field of study, the research topic, and the
individual's progress. On average, a full-time PhD program takes
between 3 to 5 years to complete. However, some programs can take
12
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
longer, up to 7 years or more, especially if the student is pursuing a
interdisciplinary or complex research project. Part-time PhD programs
can take longer, anywhere from 4 to 8 years, or more.
It's important to note that the time to completion can vary greatly
based on the individual and their progress. Some students may
complete their PhD in a shorter amount of time, while others may take
longer due to unexpected challenges or setbacks along the way. The
key is to stay focused, stay motivated, and to seek support from your
advisors and colleagues as needed.
Chances of rejection of PhD thesis:
The chances of rejection of a thesis can depend on several factors,
including the quality of the research, the methodology used, the
writing and presentation of the results, and the defense of the thesis.
Some common reasons for thesis rejection include:
1. Inadequate research: If the research is not rigorous or lacks
sufficient depth and breadth, it may not meet the standards expected
for a PhD thesis.
2. Flaws in methodology: If the research design or methodology is not
appropriate for the research question, the results may be considered
unreliable or invalid.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
13
Introduction
3. Poor writing and presentation: If the thesis is poorly written or is
not well-organized, it may be difficult for the reader to understand the
research and its implications.
4. Weak defense: If the student is unable to effectively defend their
thesis during the oral examination, it may be rejected.
5. Ethical violations: If the research is found to have violated ethical
standards, such as by failing to obtain informed consent from
participants or by falsifying data, it may be rejected.
It's important to seek feedback from advisors and to thoroughly
review and revise the thesis before submitting it for review. By
ensuring that the research is rigorous, the methodology is appropriate,
the writing is clear and concise, and the defense is well-prepared, the
student can reduce the chances of rejection.
The Aim of this book:
This book aims to be helpful in guiding PhD students and their
advisors to approach authoring skills in a more organized manner.
Based on my experience of supervising students and teaching a
comprehensive course on PhD drafting and writing, I hold the belief
that authoring skills play a significant role (40-50%) in determining
one's success in completing a doctorate in most social sciences and
14
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
humanities disciplines. Though research ideas, originality and
discipline-specific knowledge and skills are critical, without parallel
development of authoring abilities, there is a risk of not being able to
complete the thesis to the required level and in a reasonable time.
Effective research and authoring skills are interrelated aspects of
intellectual growth and should be developed concurrently.
Additionally, authoring skills are transferable across a range of
doctoral-level disciplines and this book draws from various sources of
previous scholarly writings and ideas. This book would help the
reader understand the requirements, expectations, and conventions of
thesis writing, as well as provide practical tips and strategies for
completing a high-quality thesis. The ultimate goal is to equip the
reader with the skills and knowledge necessary to successfully
complete their thesis and make a valuable contribution to their field of
study.
The thesis writing process encompasses all aspects of creating a final
written work, including envisioning the content, outlining the plan,
drafting sections, writing the entire piece, revising and editing it, and
finalizing it in an appropriate format, along with the option of
publishing all or parts of the text. Intellectual and logistical challenges
can arise at every stage of the process.
A thesis or a substantial dissertation plays a crucial role in the majority
of PhD education programs. Essential writing principles apply to
numerous humanities and social science disciplines.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
15
Introduction
Objectives:
The objective of this book is to provide comprehensive guidance for
students and scholars in navigating the process of writing a thesis. The
book aims to help readers understand the various steps involved in the
process, from choosing a topic, conducting literature review, writing the
proposal, and finally defending the thesis. It is intended to serve as a
practical and concise resource for anyone looking to successfully
complete their thesis.
Perspective:
The perspective of the book is to provide an insider's view of the thesis
writing process, drawing on the author's experience and expertise in the
field. The author recognizes the challenges and difficulties that students
and scholars face when writing their thesis, and provides a step-by-step
guide to help them overcome these obstacles. The book provides
practical tips, strategies, and best practices for writing a successful
thesis, and offers a realistic and honest approach to the process, based
on the author's own experiences and those of other students and
scholars. The book is written from a student-cantered perspective,
recognizing the unique needs and concerns of the reader, and providing
the information and support needed to succeed in the thesis writing
process.
16
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Target audience of this book:
1. Students and scholars who are in the process of or are planning to
write a thesis.
2. Undergraduate and Postgraduate students would benefit from this
book.
3. This book would be suitable for those who advice and supervise
research students.
4. Since this book is written in an accessible style, it would be useful for
a range of readers regardless of their prior knowledge or experience in
the field.
Scope:
The scope of this book is to provide a comprehensive guide to the
process of writing a thesis, covering all aspects from choosing a topic to
defending the thesis. The book provides practical tips, strategies, and
best practices for successful thesis writing, and includes insights into the
challenges and difficulties that students and scholars may face along the
way. The book is intended to serve as a resource for anyone looking to
complete their thesis successfully.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
17
Introduction
Limitations:
The limitations of the book are that it focuses on the general thesis
writing process and may not cover the specific requirements and
guidelines of individual institutions or academic fields. Additionally, the
book may not address all the unique challenges and complexities of
writing a thesis in certain areas of study. It is important to note that the
book is not intended to replace the advice and guidance of a thesis
advisor or supervisor, and that students and scholars should always seek
the support and guidance of an expert in their field. The book is meant
to complement, rather than replace, other resources and support
systems available to thesis writers.
18
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
19
Introduction
20
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
21
Introduction
22
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
CHAPTER 2
Choosing a Topic and
Developing a Thesis
Statement
1. Start with your interests and passion, pick a topic you care about.
It's crucial to pick a topic for your dissertation or research project that holds
your interest, as completing the project will require several weeks or even
months of dedication. Consider selecting a topic that aligns with your career
goals or draws from a related module in your course to increase motivation
and make the process smoother. Remember, having a passion for the subject
matter will make it easier to stay motivated. Additionally, choosing a subject
that has the potential to benefit your future career is a wise decision.
Selecting a distinctive topic for your project or dissertation is crucial to ensure
that you have the chance to conduct original research and reach your own
conclusions. While finding a completely original area may be challenging, you
could try approaching a well-studied topic from a novel perspective or develop
a fresh concept from a smaller, less explored subject. This will give you the
opportunity to make a meaningful contribution to the field.
A dissertation or research project must be a tightly written, academic piece of
work. Each sentence should contribute to the construction of the research or
argument and the overall piece must follow a clear structure. Choosing an idea
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
23
Choosing a Topic and Developing a Thesis Statement
that is too broad may make it impossible to explore the topic fully in the word
count allowed and can make it extremely difficult to draw concise conclusions.
Your tutor may emphasize the importance of conciseness, but it's essential to
keep in mind that your dissertation must meet the minimum word count
requirement. Choosing a topic or question that is overly limited will make it
challenging to elaborate on your ideas and arrive at comprehensive
conclusions. When writing your proposal, avoid selecting a question that has a
straightforward "yes" or "no" answer, as this will limit the depth and
complexity of your research.
It's common to become overly attached to a topic early in the research
process, which can result in disregarding its limitations. To avoid this, it's
important to assess the potential and scope of your idea objectively. Try to
view your topic from an external perspective to ensure that it is a strong and
viable idea. If necessary, don't hesitate to pivot and choose a different topic as long as you have a well-planned schedule, you should have ample time to
make a switch.
Your tutor serves as a mentor and advisor throughout the dissertation writing
process, ready to assist with any questions or concerns, no matter their size.
After conducting some initial research and developing a potential topic idea,
schedule a meeting with your tutor to seek their guidance. With their extensive
experience advising other students on their topic choices, you can be confident
that you will receive valuable recommendations.
Scope of the assignment
Consider the scope and limitations of the assignment.
Scope refers to the boundaries or coverage of a particular topic, including what
it covers and what it excludes. The scope of a topic defines the parameters of
what will be included in the study or research.
24
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Limitations, on the other hand, refer to the factors that may impact or restrict
the findings or conclusions of a study. These can include things like the sample
size, method of data collection, time frame, available resources, etc.
When considering a topic, it's important to clearly define its scope and
limitations so that the study can be focused, relevant, and achievable within the
given constraints. This helps to ensure that the results of the study are
meaningful and can be applied to a specific context.
Limitations of the assignment:
When considering the scope of a thesis title, the following steps can be helpful:
1. Define the research question: Start by identifying the main research question
that your thesis will aim to answer.
2. Determine the purpose: Clarify the purpose of your research and the
objectives that you aim to achieve.
3. Review relevant literature: Review existing literature in the field to gain a
deeper understanding of the topic and to identify any gaps in knowledge that
your research will aim to fill.
4. Define the key variables and concepts: Clearly define and operationalize the
key variables and concepts that will be central to your research.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
25
Choosing a Topic and Developing a Thesis Statement
5. Establish boundaries: Decide on the geographic, temporal, and other
boundaries that will define the scope of your research.
Identifying limitations:
To identify limitations, you can follow these steps:
1. Define the scope of your project or task.
Defining the scope of a project or task involves clearly outlining its boundaries
and objectives, as well as what is included and excluded from its completion.
This helps to ensure that all stakeholders have a clear understanding of the
project's goals and objectives, as well as what resources and time frame are
required to achieve them. A well-defined project scope helps to manage
expectations, minimize scope creep, and ensure that the project stays on track
and within budget.
2. Analyze your resources, including time, budget, and personnel.
Analysing resources in a project or task involves evaluating and estimating the
amount of time, budget, and manpower required to complete it successfully.
This is an important step in the project planning process as it helps to ensure
that the project has sufficient resources to meet its objectives. By analyzing the
resources, project managers can identify any potential constraints or
limitations and make adjustments to the project plan as needed. Time analysis
26
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
involves determining the duration of each task and the timeline for the entire
project, budget analysis involves estimating the cost of materials, equipment,
labour, and any other expenses, and manpower analysis involves determining
the number and type of personnel required to complete the project tasks. The
outcome of this analysis helps to inform the project budget and schedule and
to ensure that the project is completed within the specified constraints.
To analyze resources for a research project, including time, budget, and
manpower, you can follow these steps:
1. Define the scope of the project: Determine the objectives and deliverables
of the project, and make sure they are clearly defined.
2. Determine the activities required: Break down the project into smaller,
manageable tasks, and identify the activities required to complete each task.
3. Establish a timeline: Based on the activities required, establish a timeline for
the project, including start and end dates for each task.
4. Allocate manpower: Assign specific individuals or teams to each task and
estimate the number of hours or days they will need to complete it.
5. Determine the budget: Establish a budget for the project, including all
expenses related to personnel, equipment, materials, and any other costs.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
27
Choosing a Topic and Developing a Thesis Statement
6. Review and refine: Regularly review and refine your resource analysis, as
changes in project scope or other factors may impact your original estimates.
7. Monitor and adjust: Continuously monitor the project's progress and adjust
resource allocations as necessary to ensure that the project stays on track.
Gantt chart
Gantt chart can be used to find the timeline for a research project. By showing
the start and end dates for each task, a Gantt chart provides a clear visual
representation of the project schedule and allows project managers to easily
see the timeline for the entire project or specific tasks within the project. A
Gantt chart is a visual representation of a project timeline, consisting of
horizontal bars that display the progress of each task. This method of project
tracking is crucial in keeping up with the status of each task and enables easy
monitoring of the project's progress.
The timeline in a Gantt chart can be used to:
1. Establish deadlines for tasks and milestones.
2.
Identify potential bottlenecks in the project schedule.
3. Assess the impact of changes to the project scope or timeline.
4. Monitor the progress of tasks and the project as a whole.
28
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
5. Identify areas where additional resources may be needed to keep the
project on track.
Overall, using a Gantt chart to find the timeline for a research project can help
project managers to effectively plan and manage the project, ensuring that it
stays on track and is completed within the desired timeframe.
There are many software options available for preparing Gantt charts. Some of
the most popular ones include:
1. Microsoft Project: A comprehensive project management software that
includes Gantt chart capabilities, along with task management, resource
management, and scheduling features.
2. Trello: A project management tool that allows users to create Gantt charts
using its "Calendar" view.
3. Asana: A collaborative work management platform that includes a Gantt
view for visualizing project timelines.
4. Smartsheet: A cloud-based project management and collaboration platform
that includes Gantt chart capabilities.
5. Airtable: A spreadsheet-based project management tool that allows users to
create Gantt charts using its “Calendar” view.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
29
Choosing a Topic and Developing a Thesis Statement
6. GanttProject: An open-source Gantt chart software that provides a range of
project management features, including Gantt charts, task management, and
resource allocation.
These are just a few examples of the many software options available for
creating Gantt charts. You can choose a software that best fits your project
management needs and budget.
To create a Gantt chart, you need the following data:
1. Task names: The names of the tasks or activities that are to be included in
the chart.
2. Start dates: The dates when each task is scheduled to begin.
3. End dates: The dates when each task is scheduled to end.
4. Durations: The length of time required to complete each task.
5. Dependencies: The relationships between tasks, such as which tasks must be
completed before others can begin.
6. Resource allocation: Information on who or what is responsible for each
task, such as team members or equipment.
30
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
7. Progress: Information on the status of each task, such as how much has
been completed and whether it is on schedule.
8. Milestones: Key dates or events that mark significant progress in the project.
Having this data will allow you to create a Gantt chart that accurately represents the timeline of your project and helps you to track progress and identify any potential issues.
Creating a Gantt chart:
Step 1: Start should be made with a project/initiative in mind.
The author may not exactly know how long it is going to take to complete the
work at this point.
Step 2: Assessing the current project plan.
The author should look at every single step, from initiation to completion so
that a clear idea is formed as well as the work distribution to persons who
needs to be involved. This is what that will be used to determine timelines.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
31
Choosing a Topic and Developing a Thesis Statement
Step 3: Determining the interdependent tasks.
Some of the tasks may be completed / attempted simultaneously and some
cannot begin until another task is finished. This step will help the author to
understand the time associated with each step and when the steps should take
place.
Step 4: Compiling the task time frames in a Gantt chart layout.
This step is where the software comes into play. It allows the author to enter
start and end tasks and then it automatically generates a Gantt chart. This
chart will ensure that anyone with access can see how long each project would
take. In this step the author needs to realize some milestones are too involved
and hence should be broken down into sub milestones.
Step 5: Adding additional information, accountability, budget, description etc.
It is a good idea to include information that will help viewers understand each
component of the project. The downside being, that if the author desires to
keep the Gantt chart uncluttered and there typically isn't much room for
descriptions, analysis or recommendations. Some available software make
useful accommodations for this by allowing the user to create detail pages for
each component that can be included in the report and navigated to if
necessary.
32
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Step 6: Breaking down the budget.
This is the step where budget gets broken down based on the milestones.
Once the budget has been allocated the user would get a more clear idea of
whether the project can be completed within the budget or not.
Step 7: Assigning ownership.
Every component of the project should have an owner. When people take
ownership for the task they are more likely to ensure that it is completed on
time and is of expected quality. If there are a number of contributors, it is
useful to include their names as contributors on the Gantt chart.
Step 8: Continuously using Gantt chart as a reference.
As time progresses the author should keep using the chart as a reference. It
will allow the user to assess the current status of different components and
determine what those statuses mean for project completion.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
33
Choosing a Topic and Developing a Thesis Statement
External factors that could affect the project.
Consider any external factors that may affect your project, such as laws,
regulations, or technological advancements.
Following external factors need to be considered:
1. Laws and regulations: Changes in laws and regulations can affect the
feasibility and cost of a project, as well as the timeline for completion.
There are several laws and regulations that can impact a research project,
including:
1. Data protection laws: Research projects that collect, use, or store personal
data must comply with data protection laws, such as the General Data
Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union.
2. Research ethics: Research projects must adhere to ethical standards, such as
those set by institutional review boards (IRBs) or ethics committees. This can
include obtaining informed consent from participants, protecting participant
confidentiality, and avoiding harm to participants.
3. Intellectual property laws: Research projects that involve proprietary or
patented information must comply with intellectual property laws, such as
patent law, to avoid infringing on the rights of others.
34
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
4. Environmental laws: Research projects that impact the environment, such
as field studies or laboratory experiments, must comply with environmental
laws, such as the Endangered Species Act or the Clean Water Act.
5. Health and safety laws: Research projects that involve hazardous materials
or procedures must comply with health and safety laws, such as the
Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA).
It's important for researchers to be aware of the laws and regulations that
apply to their projects and to take steps to comply with them to ensure the
legality, ethics, and safety of their research.
2. Technological advancements: Advances in technology can change the way a
project is executed, as well as the materials and equipment needed to complete
it.
3. Economic conditions: Changes in the economy, such as inflation or
recession, can affect the budget and resources available for a project.
4. Competition: New competitors entering the market or changes in market
conditions can impact the success of a project.
5. Political climate: Changes in the political climate, such as elections or
international events, can affect the resources available for a project and the
regulatory environment in which it operates.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
35
Choosing a Topic and Developing a Thesis Statement
By considering these external factors and assessing their potential impact,
project managers can better anticipate challenges and plan accordingly.
Reviewing previous research on the topic
Reviewing previous research data related to the project is an important step in
the research process. This can help you to:
1. Gain an understanding of the existing knowledge and literature in your field
of study.
2. Identify gaps in the existing research that your project can fill.
3. Establish the significance and relevance of your project.
4. Avoid duplicating work that has already been done.
5. Provide a basis for comparison for your own results.
6. Develop a theoretical framework for your project by building on the
findings of previous research.
36
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
7. Identify potential limitations and challenges of your project and find ways to
address them.
8. Establish a foundation for future research in the field by building on
previous research.
Consultations with stakeholders and Experts in the field
Consult with stakeholders and experts to gather additional insights.
Consulting stakeholders and experts in the field of research can be a valuable
step in the research process. This can help you to:
1. Gain a deeper understanding of the problem or issue being studied.
2. Identify the needs and perspectives of different stakeholders and
incorporate them into your research design.
3. Access valuable information and insights from experts in the field.
4. Establish credibility and legitimacy for your research by demonstrating that
it is based on input and feedback from relevant stakeholders and experts.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
37
Choosing a Topic and Developing a Thesis Statement
5. Build relationships and networks within the field that can be beneficial for
future research or collaboration.
6. Identify potential challenges and limitations of your research and find ways
to address them.
7. Obtain support and buy-in from key stakeholders, which can be important
for securing funding or other resources for your research.
Consulting stakeholders and experts in the field can help to ensure that your
research is relevant, well-informed, and well-received by those who will be
impacted by your results.
Assessing feasibility of achieving goals and objectives
Assessing the feasibility of achieving goals and objectives is an important step
in the research process. This can help you to:
1. Determine if your research objectives are realistic and attainable given the
available resources, including time, funding, and personnel.
2. Evaluate the risks and potential challenges that may impact the success of
your research and determine how to mitigate them.
38
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
3. Determine if any necessary approvals, permits, or licenses are required for
your research and if they are attainable.
4. Assess if the methods and techniques proposed for conducting the research
are feasible and suitable for the problem being studied.
5. Consider the ethical and legal implications of your research and determine if
they can be addressed within the constraints of your project.
6. Establish a realistic timeline for your research, including time for data
collection, analysis, and reporting, and assess if it is achievable.
7. Evaluate the potential impact and benefits of your research and determine if
they justify the investment of time and resources.
By assessing the feasibility of achieving your goals and objectives, you can
ensure that your research is well-planned and that you have a realistic
understanding of the challenges and risks involved.
Identification of potential knowledge gap
There are several ways to identify potential knowledge gaps in a research field,
including:
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
39
Choosing a Topic and Developing a Thesis Statement
1. Reviewing the existing literature: Carefully reviewing the existing literature
in your field of study can help you identify areas where there is limited or
conflicting information.
2. Talking to experts: Talking to experts in your field, such as academics,
practitioners, or industry professionals, can help you identify areas where more
research is needed.
3. Examining data trends: Analyzing data trends and patterns in your field can
help you identify areas where there is a need for further investigation.
4. Identifying unanswered questions: Reflecting on the questions that have
arisen from your review of the literature or from discussions with experts can
help you identify potential knowledge gaps.
5. Looking for anomalies: Examining data or findings that deviate from what is
expected can highlight areas where more research is needed.
6. Considering practical implications: Examining the practical implications of
research findings and considering areas where further research is needed to
inform real-world applications.
By using these methods, you can identify potential knowledge gaps in your
field of study and determine where further research is needed.
40
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Role of documentation for future reference
It is important to document and prioritize the limitations of your research for
future reference. This can help you to:
1. Ensure that your research findings are understood in the proper context.
2. Foster transparency and credibility by openly acknowledging the limitations
of your research.
3. Provide a basis for future research by identifying areas where further
investigation is needed.
4. Evaluate the generalizability of your findings and determine the extent to
which they can be applied to other situations or contexts.
5. Ensure that your research is not overstated or misinterpreted by clearly
stating its limitations.
6. Enhance the reliability and validity of your research by addressing
limitations and improving methods and techniques.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
41
Choosing a Topic and Developing a Thesis Statement
7. Provide a road map for future research by highlighting areas where
additional data or investigation is needed.
Documenting and prioritizing the limitations of your research is an important
step in the research process that can help to ensure that your findings are well
understood and can inform future research.
Evaluate if the topic has enough information available to research and
write about:
Evaluating if a topic has enough information available to research and write
about is an important step in the research process. This can help you to:
1. Determine the feasibility of your research project by assessing the
availability of relevant data and information.
2. Assess the depth and breadth of existing research on your topic and
determine if there is a need for further investigation.
3. Evaluate the quality and reliability of the available information and
determine if it is suitable for your research needs.
4. Identify potential knowledge gaps and areas where further research is
needed.
42
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
5. Avoid wasting time and resources on a research project that is not feasible
or feasible with limited results.
6. Make informed decisions about the design and focus of your research
project by evaluating the available information and its relevance to your goals
and objectives.
7. Ensure that your research project is well-informed and based on solid
evidence.
By evaluating if a topic has enough information available to research and write
about, you can ensure that your research project is well-informed, feasible, and
has the potential to make a meaningful contribution to your field of study.
Refine the topic by considering its relevance and importance to your
field and to the audience
Refining a research topic by considering its relevance and importance to your
field and to the audience is an important step in the research process. This can
help you to:
1. Ensure that your research project is relevant and aligned with the current
priorities and needs of your field of study.
2. Address important questions and problems that have practical or theoretical
implications for your field.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
43
Choosing a Topic and Developing a Thesis Statement
3. Make your research project more impactful by focusing on a topic that is
important and relevant to the current body of knowledge.
4. Increase the potential for your research to be published and cited by
focusing on a topic that is of interest to the research community.
5. Ensure that your research project is accessible and understandable to your
intended audience by considering their needs and interests.
6. Improve the chances of your research project being funded or supported by
demonstrating its relevance and importance to the wider community.
7. Foster collaboration and interdisciplinary exchange by selecting a topic that
is relevant and important to multiple fields of study.
By refining your research topic and considering its relevance and importance
to your field and to your audience, you can ensure that your research project is
well-aligned with current priorities and has the potential to make a meaningful
contribution to your field of study.
Developing a thesis statement:
A thesis statement is a brief and clear statement that explains the central
argument or claim of an essay or research paper. To develop a thesis
statement, consider the following steps:
1. Identify the main topic and purpose of your paper.
44
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
2. Narrow down the topic to a specific aspect you want to focus on.
3. Develop a clear and concise argument or claim that supports your main
topic.
4. Ensure that the thesis statement is arguable and can be supported with
evidence.
5. Revise and refine the thesis statement as needed.
Example:
Topic: Climate change
Purpose: To raise awareness of the impacts of human activities on the
environment.
Thesis statement: Human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels and
deforestation, are the main drivers of climate change and have significant
negative impacts on the environment and human health.
Here is an example of a thesis statement:
Topic: The effects of social media on modern relationships
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
45
Choosing a Topic and Developing a Thesis Statement
Thesis statement: The increased use of social media has had a profound
impact on modern relationships, both positively by enabling easier
communication and connection, but negatively by leading to decreased faceto-face communication and higher rates of jealousy and relationship instability.
A thesis statement is an essential part of any written piece as it serves as a
roadmap and guides the writer throughout the writing process. It
communicates the main argument or purpose of the piece to the reader,
clarifying what the writer will be discussing or arguing about. Writing a clear
and concise thesis statement helps to keep the writer focused, ensures that the
writing stays on topic, and helps the reader to understand the writer's purpose
and perspective. Ultimately, a well-crafted thesis statement can make the
difference between a poorly structured, confusing piece of writing and a clear,
effective one.
Components of thesis statement:
A thesis statement typically consists of three main components:
1. The topic: This is the general subject or theme of the piece of writing. It
provides context and sets the stage for the argument or main point of the
piece.
2. The argument or main point: This is the writer's stance on the topic or the
specific position they are taking. It is the main idea that the writer will be
defending or supporting throughout the piece.
46
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
3. Supporting details or evidence: This component briefly outlines the reasons
or evidence that the writer will use to support their argument. It helps to clarify
the writer's stance and provide a roadmap for the rest of the piece.
When writing a thesis statement, it is important to keep it clear, concise, and
specific. A well-crafted thesis statement should be no longer than one sentence
and should clearly state the writer's argument.
Here is an example of a poorly crafted thesis statement:
"In this paper, I will be talking about how pollution is bad for the environment
and for people's health and it is important for everyone to do their part to help
reduce it."
This thesis statement is poorly crafted because it is too vague and does not
clearly state the writer's argument. It also includes multiple points, making it
unclear what the writer will be focusing on. A better-crafted thesis statement
might be:
"Pollution not only harm the environment but also poses serious health risks
to people, therefore, reducing individual carbon footprint through daily
actions is crucial in mitigating the effects of pollution."
Tips to improve clarity of thesis statement:
Here are some tips to improve the clarity of a thesis statement:
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
47
Choosing a Topic and Developing a Thesis Statement
1. Be specific: Avoid general or vague language and make sure your thesis
statement states your specific argument.
2. Keep it concise: A thesis statement should be one sentence and should
clearly state your argument.
3. Avoid ambiguity: Make sure your thesis statement is clear and easy to
understand, avoiding any ambiguity or double meanings.
4. Focus on one main idea: Your thesis statement should focus on one main
idea and not attempt to cover multiple points or arguments.
5. Use strong verbs: Choose strong verbs that clearly state your argument, such
as "argue," "prove," "defend," etc.
6. Avoid filler words: Remove any unnecessary words or phrases that do not
add to the clarity of your thesis statement.
7. Consider your audience: Make sure your thesis statement is clear and easy to
understand for your intended audience.
By following these tips, you can improve the clarity of your thesis statement
and ensure that it effectively communicates your argument to your reader.
Here is a template that can be used to construct a thesis statement:
48
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
"In this [piece of writing/essay/etc.], I will [argue/prove/etc.] that [main argument/thesis].
This is important because [supporting reason/evidence]."
For example:
"In this essay, I will argue that climate change is a significant threat to our
planet. This is important because the evidence shows that its impacts are
already being felt and will only worsen if immediate action is not taken."
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
49
Choosing a Topic and Developing a Thesis Statement
50
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
CHAPTER 3
Conducting Literature
review
A literature review is an essential part of the thesis-writing process as it
provides crucial context and background information for the research being
conducted. Conducting a literature review before writing a thesis serves several
important purposes:
1. Establishing context: A literature review helps to place the research
being conducted in the larger context of existing knowledge on the
topic.
Establishing context in a literature review involves situating the research being
conducted within the larger body of existing knowledge on the topic. Here are
some steps to establish context using a literature review:
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
51
Conducting Literature review
1. Identify the key themes and concepts related to the topic: This involves
reviewing the existing literature to identify the central ideas, theories, and
debates related to the topic.
2. Evaluate the existing literature: This involves critically reviewing the existing
research and assessing its strengths, weaknesses, and limitations.
3. Organize the literature: Once you have reviewed the existing literature, you
should organize it into categories or themes that help to establish the context
of your research.
4. Synthesize the literature: This involves summarizing and synthesizing the
existing research to provide an overview of the state of knowledge on the
topic.
5. Identify gaps in knowledge: By reviewing the existing literature, you can
identify areas where further research is needed and where your research can
make a contribution.
6. Provide a historical overview: This involves tracing the evolution of research
on the topic and providing a historical context for the research being
conducted.
By following these steps, a literature review can help to establish context for
the research being conducted and provide the foundation for the research.
Establishing context is important as it provides the reader with an
52
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
understanding of the broader context of the research and its relevance to
existing knowledge on the topic.
2. Identifying gaps in knowledge: By reviewing the existing literature, a
researcher can identify areas where there is a lack of knowledge or
where further research is needed.
3. Justifying the research: A thorough literature review provides the basis
for why the research being conducted is important and necessary.
4. Guiding the research: The literature review can inform the research
questions, hypotheses, and methodology of the study.
5. Preventing duplicated effort: By reviewing the existing literature, a
researcher can avoid repeating research that has already been done,
which would be a waste of time and resources.
In conclusion, conducting a literature review is a crucial step in the thesiswriting process as it provides the foundation and context for the research
being conducted. By conducting a thorough and well-informed literature
review, researchers can ensure that their research is grounded in existing
knowledge and is relevant and important.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
53
Conducting Literature review
Resources needed for conducting a proper literature review:
The resources needed for a literature review will depend on the scope of the
review and the specific research topic. However, some common resources
include:
1. Academic journals: These are a primary source of peer-reviewed research
articles in a wide range of disciplines and are an essential resource for
conducting a literature review.
2. Books: Books can provide comprehensive coverage of a topic and are an
important resource for conducting a literature review.
3. Conference proceedings: These can provide access to the latest research and
can be a valuable resource for a literature review.
4. Dissertations and theses: These can provide access to original research and
can be a valuable resource for a literature review.
5. Online databases: Online databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of
Science, and Google Scholar can provide access to many academic articles and
are an important resource for conducting a literature review.
6. Government reports and statistics: Government reports and statistics can
provide important information on a topic and can be a valuable resource for a
literature review.
54
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
7. News articles: News articles can provide insight into current events and can
be a valuable resource for a literature review.
In addition to these resources, it is important to consult with your supervisor
or academic advisor for guidance on the specific resources you will need for
your literature review. The goal is to gather as much relevant information as
possible in order to provide a comprehensive and well-informed review of the
existing literature on the topic.
Role of Academic Journals:
Academic journals play a critical role in the literature review process. They are
the primary source of peer-reviewed research articles in a wide range of
disciplines and provide the following benefits:
1. Up-to-date information: Academic journals are a reliable source of the latest
research on a given topic and can provide researchers with up-to-date
information.
2. Peer-review: Articles published in academic journals have been subject to a
rigorous peer-review process, ensuring that the research is of high quality and
has been critically evaluated by experts in the field.
3. Depth of coverage: Academic journals often provide in-depth coverage of
specific topics, allowing researchers to gain a comprehensive understanding of
the current state of knowledge on a given topic.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
55
Conducting Literature review
4. Access to a large pool of research: Academic journals provide access to a
large pool of research on a given topic, allowing researchers to conduct a
comprehensive literature review.
5. Credibility: Articles published in academic journals are considered credible
and trustworthy, making them a valuable resource for conducting a literature
review.
In conclusion, academic journals play a critical role in the literature review
process by providing researchers with up-to-date, peer-reviewed information
on a given topic. They are an essential resource for conducting a
comprehensive and well-informed literature review.
Role of books in literature review:
Books play a crucial role in literature reviews as they are the primary sources of
information and research in the field. Literature reviews often involve reading
and evaluating multiple books on a particular subject or theme and
synthesizing the information to provide an overview of the current state of
knowledge on that topic. By reading and evaluating books, literature reviews
can identify gaps in research and suggest areas for future study. The selection
of books in a literature review can also influence the overall conclusions and
recommendations made. One thing should be borne in mind that books are at
least 5 years behind when compared to academic journals. Details given in the
book would be outdated by the time the research project is completed.
Materials given in the book is so credible that they can be quoted liberally in
the thesis. Majority of research scholars use standard textbooks while penning
the introduction chapter.
56
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Role of on line databases in literature review:
Online databases are also an important source of information in literature
reviews. They provide access to many academic journals, articles, and other
scholarly works, often with full-text access. This makes it easier for researchers
to find relevant information on a particular subject or theme, and to search for
specific keywords, authors, or publication dates. Online databases can also be
useful for searching for interdisciplinary literature, as they cover a wide range
of fields and disciplines. Some examples of widely used online databases in the
academic community include JSTOR, PubMed, and Google Scholar.
However, it's important to critically evaluate the sources found in these
databases, as not all information is of equal quality or relevance.
There are several advantages of using online databases in literature reviews,
including:
1. Convenience: Online databases can be accessed from anywhere with an
internet connection, making it easier to conduct literature reviews from remote
locations.
2. Larger scope: Online databases often have a much larger scope than
traditional library catalogs, making it easier to find relevant information on a
particular subject or theme.
3. Search capabilities: Online databases offer advanced search capabilities,
including keyword searching and the ability to filter by date, author, and other
criteria, making it easier to find relevant articles and information.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
57
Conducting Literature review
4. Interdisciplinary: Online databases provide access to literature from a wide
range of fields and disciplines, making it easier to find interdisciplinary
literature.
5. Full-text access: Many online databases provide full-text access to articles,
making it easier to access the complete content of articles without having to
request them from the library.
6. Up to date: Online databases are typically updated frequently, providing
access to the most recent research and information in the field.
Overall, the use of online databases can greatly enhance the efficiency and
accuracy of literature reviews, making it easier to find and evaluate relevant
information.
Here are some of the most widely used online databases for literature reviews:
1. JSTOR: A digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources.
2. PubMed: A database of biomedical literature, including articles from
medical journals and online books.
3. Google Scholar: A search engine for scholarly literature, including articles,
theses, books, and conference papers.
58
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
4. Web of Science: A database of scientific and scholarly articles, conference
proceedings, and other research materials.
5. Scopus: A database of peer-reviewed literature in the fields of science,
technology, medicine, social sciences, and arts and humanities.
6. ProQuest: A database of academic journals, magazines, and newspapers,
including many full-text articles.
7. Emerald Insight: A database of scholarly literature in the fields of
management, marketing, and engineering.
8. EBSCOhost: A database of academic journals, magazines, and other
resources in many different fields.
These databases cover a wide range of fields and disciplines, making it possible
to find literature in a variety of subjects. They offer advanced search
capabilities, full-text access to articles, and the ability to search for specific
keywords, authors, or publication dates.
Role of Government Reports and Statistics in Literature review:
Government reports and statistics can play a significant role in literature
reviews, providing valuable data and information on a particular subject or
theme. They can be used to:
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
59
Conducting Literature review
1. Provide context: Government reports and statistics can provide background
information on the subject, including historical trends and current conditions.
2. Supply data: Government reports often contain a wealth of data and
statistics on a particular subject, providing a basis for analysis and comparison.
3. Validate findings: Government reports and statistics can be used to validate
findings from other sources, such as academic articles and books.
4. Offer unique perspectives: Government reports often offer unique
perspectives on a particular subject, including policy recommendations and
viewpoints from government agencies.
5. Inform policy decisions: Literature reviews that incorporate government
reports and statistics can help inform policy decisions by providing a
comprehensive view of the current state of knowledge on a particular subject.
However, it's important to critically evaluate government reports and statistics,
as they may be influenced by political or ideological biases or may not be based
on rigorous scientific or methodological standards. Additionally, government
reports may not always be up-to-date or cover all relevant information on a
subject. Nevertheless, government reports and statistics can provide valuable
data and information for literature reviews, when used appropriately and
critically.
60
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Review of literature using Newspaper reports:
A review of literature for thesis writing from newspaper reports involves
analysing and evaluating existing news articles, editorials, and other written
pieces published in newspapers related to your research topic. This allows you
to gain a deeper understanding of the current discourse on the topic, identify
gaps in the existing research, and provide context for your own research.
When conducting a review of literature from newspaper reports, it is
important to consider the following steps:
1. Identify relevant sources: Use search engines and library databases to locate
relevant news articles, editorials, and other written pieces published in
newspapers.
2. Evaluate the credibility of the sources: Check the reputation of the
newspaper, the author of the article, and any sources cited in the article.
3. Summarize and synthesize the information: Read each article carefully and
summarize its main points, taking note of any trends or patterns in the
information presented.
4. Critically analyze the information: Evaluate the reliability and validity of the
information presented in each article, considering factors such as bias,
accuracy, and objectivity.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
61
Conducting Literature review
5. Organize and integrate the information: Organize the information you have
gathered into a coherent structure, highlighting the main themes and ideas.
Using newspaper reports in your review of literature can provide valuable
insights into current discussions and debates related to your research topic and
can also help you to contextualize your own research.
Assessing the credibility of newspaper reports:
Assessing the credibility of a newspaper report is an important step in
conducting a literature review, as it helps to determine the reliability and
validity of the information presented. Here are some key factors to consider
when assessing the credibility of a newspaper report:
1. Reputation of the newspaper: Consider the reputation of the newspaper, its
history, and any awards it has received for journalism. Established and wellrespected newspapers tend to have higher standards for accuracy and
objectivity.
2. Author qualifications: Check the author's qualifications and expertise in the
topic being reported on. An author with a background in the relevant field is
more likely to produce accurate and credible information.
62
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
3. Sources cited: Look for sources that are cited in the article and evaluate their
credibility. Credible sources are typically peer-reviewed academic journals,
government reports, and other reliable sources.
4. Evidence presented: Check if the report includes evidence to support its
claims, such as statistics, data, or quotes from experts.
5. Bias: Evaluate the article for any potential biases, such as political or
commercial interests. Consider the author's personal beliefs, the newspaper's
editorial stance, and any funding sources.
6. Timeliness: Consider the date of publication and whether the information is
still relevant and up to date.
By evaluating these factors, you can gain a clearer understanding of the
reliability and validity of the information presented in a newspaper report and
determine whether it is a credible source for your literature review.
Collating review of literature:
Collating a review of literature involves organizing and synthesizing the
information gathered from various sources, including academic journals,
books, and newspaper reports, in a meaningful and coherent way. Here are
some steps you can follow when collating your review of literature:
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
63
Conducting Literature review
1. Identify themes and patterns: Read through the sources you have gathered
and identify any themes, patterns, or common ideas that emerge.
2. Organize the information: Categorize the information into themes,
subthemes, or related topics, and create an outline of your review of literature.
3. Synthesize the information: Combine and summarize the information from
each source, making connections between different themes and patterns.
4. Evaluate the information: Assess the quality and relevance of the
information, considering factors such as the credibility of the sources, the
reliability of the data, and the validity of the arguments presented.
5. Write the review: Write the review, incorporating the information and
insights you have gained from your analysis of the literature. Be sure to present
the information in a clear, concise, and organized manner, and include
appropriate references and citations.
The goal of collating a review of literature is to provide a comprehensive and
up-to-date overview of the existing research on your topic, identify gaps in the
existing research, and provide context for your own research. By synthesizing
the information from a variety of sources, you can gain a deeper understanding
of the current state of knowledge in your field.
64
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
A review of literature typically includes the following elements:
Introduction:
A brief overview of the research topic, the purpose of the review, and the
scope of the literature review. The author should:
Outline the main subject, problem, or area of interest in question, thereby
creating a suitable context for the literature review.
Highlight the general tendencies in published material related to the topic, or
any disparities in theories, methods, proof, and results; or lacking areas in
research and academia; or a specific problem or recent perspective of
significance.
Justify the author's purpose for conducting the literature review, define the
standards for evaluating and comparing the literature, and describe the plan for
organizing the review (order); when necessary, indicate why specific literature
is included or excluded (limits).
Background:
Contextual information related to the research topic.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
65
Conducting Literature review
Theories and conceptual frameworks: A summary of the existing theories and
models relevant to the research topic.
Methodology:
A description of the methodology used for searching, selecting and evaluating
the relevant literature.
The methodology section of a review of literature should include the following
elements:
Search strategies: A description of the strategies used to search for and identify
relevant literature, such as databases, keywords, and inclusion/exclusion
criteria.
Selection criteria: A clear explanation of the criteria used to select the studies
included in the review, such as publication date, language, and relevance to the
research topic.
Data extraction: A description of the process used to extract data from the
selected studies, including the information that was collected, such as authors,
year of publication, and main findings.
Quality assessment: A discussion of the methods used to assess the quality of
the studies included in the review, such as the use of specific quality
assessment tools or a critical appraisal of the methods used in each study.
66
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Data synthesis: A description of the methods used to synthesize the data from
the selected studies, such as a narrative synthesis, meta-analysis, or systematic
review.
Limitations: A discussion of the limitations of the methodology used in the
review, such as the sources of bias, the representativeness of the sample, or the
generalizability of the results.
Conclusion: A conclusion that summarizes the methodology used in the
review and its strengths and weaknesses.
It is important to note that the methodology section should be transparent,
clear, and concise, and that the methods used should be appropriate for the
research question and the type of literature review being conducted.
Summary of findings:
A synthesis of the key findings from the reviewed literature, including
similarities, differences, and gaps.
The summary of findings section of a review of literature should include the
following elements:
Synthesis of key results: A synthesis of the main findings from the studies
included in the review, highlighting similarities, differences, and trends.
Grouping of findings: The organization of the findings into categories or
themes, based on the research question or the objectives of the review.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
67
Conducting Literature review
Evaluation of quality: A critical evaluation of the quality of the evidence,
highlighting the strengths and limitations of each study and the overall
confidence in the findings.
Comparison of findings: A comparison of the findings from different studies,
taking into account factors such as study design, sample size, and methods
used.
Identification of gaps: An identification of any gaps in the literature and areas
where further research is needed.
Implications for practice: A discussion of the implications of the findings for
practice, policy, or future research.
Conclusion: A conclusion that summarizes the main findings of the review and
their implications for the research area.
It is important to note that the summary of findings should be concise, clear,
and evidence-based, and that the findings should be presented in a way that is
easy to understand and relevant to the research question.
Implications:
Discussion of the implications of the findings for the research area and future
research.
68
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
The implications section of a review of literature should include the following
elements:
Implications for practice: A discussion of how the findings of the review can
inform and improve practice, including specific recommendations for practice,
policy, or further research.
Implications for future research: A discussion of the areas where further
research is needed and the implications of the findings for the design and
direction of future research.
Theoretical implications: A discussion of the implications of the findings for
the development and refinement of theories and models relevant to the
research area.
Limitations: A discussion of the limitations of the review and the implications
of these limitations for the interpretation and generalizability of the findings.
Conclusion: A conclusion that summarizes the main implications of the review
and its contribution to the research area.
It is important to note that the implications section should be written in a
clear, concise, and evidence-based manner, and that the implications should be
relevant and meaningful to the research question and the findings of the
review.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
69
Conducting Literature review
Conclusion:
A summary of the key points covered in the review and its contribution to the
research area.
The conclusion section of a review of literature should include the following
elements:
Summary of main findings: A brief summary of the main findings of the
review, highlighting the key results and conclusions.
Implications: A discussion of the implications of the findings for practice,
policy, theory, or future research.
Contributions to the field: A discussion of how the review has contributed to
the research area and what has been learned from the review that is new or
important.
Limitations: A discussion of the limitations of the review and its implications
for the interpretation and generalizability of the findings.
Recommendations: A discussion of the recommendations for future research,
including specific areas where further research is needed and the implications
of the findings for the design and direction of future research.
Final thoughts: A final statement that summarizes the main conclusions of the
review and its contributions to the research area.
70
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
It is important to note that the conclusion section should be clear, concise, and
evidence-based, and that the conclusions should be relevant and meaningful to
the research question and the findings of the review.
References:
A list of the sources cited in the review, formatted in accordance with the
specific citation style (e.g., APA, MLA, Harvard, etc.).
The references section of a review of literature should include all the sources
that were consulted and cited in the review. The specific elements that should
be included in the references section depend on the referencing style used, but
the following information is typically included:
Author information: The name(s) of the author(s) and, if applicable, the year
of publication.
Title of publication: The title of the publication, such as a journal article, book,
or conference proceedings.
Publication details: The publication details of the source, including the name
of the journal, the volume and issue number, the page numbers, and the
publication date.
URL: The URL of an online source, if applicable.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
71
Conducting Literature review
It is important to note that the references should be organized alphabetically
by the author's last name and that the referencing style used should be
consistent throughout the review. Additionally, the references should be
complete and accurate, and should accurately reflect the sources that were
consulted and cited in the review.
Note: The exact structure and content of a review of literature may vary
depending on the discipline and the purpose of the review.
72
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
CHAPTER 4
Methodology & Data
Collection
The methodology in a thesis refers to the approach that the researcher takes to
carry out the research. This includes the design of the study, the research
method used (such as qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods), the data
collection methods, and the data analysis techniques.
There are several types of research methodologies that can be used in a thesis,
including:
Quantitative methodology:
Quantitative methodology is a research approach that involves collecting and
analysing numerical data to answer research questions. This approach is used
to test hypotheses and quantify relationships between variables.
Quantitative research typically involves large sample sizes and statistical
analysis. The goal is to obtain numerical data that can be used to draw
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
73
Methodology & Data Collection
inferences about the population being studied. This allows the researcher to
make generalizations about the population based on the sample data.
Examples of quantitative data collection methods include surveys,
experiments, and secondary data analysis. Surveys can be administered in
person, by mail, or online and can include structured questionnaires or
interviews. Experiments involve manipulating an independent variable to
observe its effect on a dependent variable. Secondary data analysis involves
analysing existing data sets, such as government reports or previous studies.
Quantitative methodology is well suited for studying phenomena that can be
measured and quantified. It is also useful for testing hypotheses and examining
cause-and-effect relationships between variables. However, it may not be the
best approach for exploring complex social issues or understanding people's
experiences and perspectives. In these cases, a qualitative methodology may be
more appropriate.
The steps involved in conducting a quantitative research study using a
quantitative methodology are as follows:
1. Developing the research question: The first step is to identify the research
question and determine the purpose of the study. This will guide the
development of the research design and help determine the appropriate data
collection and analysis methods.
2. Designing the study: The next step is to determine the study design. This
includes selecting the type of study (e.g., survey, experiment), determining the
sample size and sampling method, and identifying the variables to be studied.
3. Developing the data collection instruments: The researcher then needs to
develop the instruments that will be used to collect the data, such as
questionnaires, interview schedules, or observation forms.
74
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
4. Collecting the data: Data is collected from the study participants using the
instruments developed in the previous step.
5. Cleaning the data: Data collected during the study must be cleaned and
organized in a way that is suitable for analysis. This involves removing any
errors, inconsistencies, or outliers from the data set.
6.Analyzing the data: The next step is to analyze the data using statistical
methods, such as regression analysis, t-tests, or ANOVA. The goal is to test
the hypotheses and determine if there are significant relationships between the
variables being studied.
7.Interpreting the results: The final step is to interpret the results of the
statistical analysis and draw conclusions based on the findings. The results
should be reported in a clear and concise manner, and any limitations or
limitations of the study should be acknowledged.
8. It is important to note that the steps in a quantitative research study may
vary depending on the specific study design and research question. The steps
listed above provide a general overview of the process involved in conducting
a quantitative study using a quantitative methodology.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
75
Methodology & Data Collection
Data collection:
In quantitative research, data is collected in a structured and systematic
manner and is typically numerical in nature. The goal is to gather data that is
representative of the population being studied, so that statistical analysis can
be used to draw inferences about the population based on the sample data.
The following are some common data collection methods used in quantitative
research:
Surveys: Surveys are a common data collection method in quantitative
research. They can be administered in person, by mail, or online and can
include structured questionnaires or interviews. Surveys are used to collect
information about participants' attitudes, beliefs, behaviours, and
demographics.
Experiments: Experiments involve manipulating an independent variable to
observe its effect on a dependent variable. The goal is to determine cause-andeffect relationships between variables. Experiments can be conducted in a
laboratory setting or in the field.
Secondary data analysis: Secondary data analysis involves analysing existing
data sets, such as government reports or previous studies. This method can be
used to answer research questions when collecting primary data is not feasible
or too time-consuming.
76
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Direct observations: Direct observations involve observing and recording the
behaviours and actions of participants in a structured manner. This method
can be used to collect data on a wide range of variables, including
demographics, behaviours, and attitudes.
In quantitative research, data collection methods should be chosen based on
the research question and the type of data needed. The methods used should
ensure that the data collected is valid, reliable, and representative of the
population being studied.
Data collection pitfalls:
Quantitative research data collection methods are subject to a number of
potential pitfalls that can compromise the validity and reliability of the results.
Some common data collection pitfalls in quantitative research include:
1. Response bias: Response bias occurs when participants do not answer
questions truthfully or provide answers that are influenced by social
desirability. This can occur when participants are afraid of being judged or are
not fully aware of their own attitudes and behaviours.
2. Non-response bias: Non-response bias occurs when a significant portion of
the sample does not respond to the survey or questionnaire, leading to an
unrepresentative sample. This can occur due to a lack of incentives for
participants to respond or difficulty in reaching participants.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
77
Methodology & Data Collection
3. Measurement error: Measurement error occurs when the data collected does
not accurately reflect the true value of the variable being measured. This can
occur when the questions are poorly worded, unclear, or subject to
interpretation.
4. Sampling error: Sampling error occurs when the sample chosen for the
study is not representative of the population being studied. This can occur
when the sample is too small, the sampling method is biased, or the sample is
not random.
5. Data entry errors: Data entry errors can occur when data is recorded
inaccurately, leading to incorrect results. This can occur when the data is
recorded manually or when data is entered into a computer incorrectly.
It is important to be aware of these pitfalls and to take steps to minimize their
impact on the results of the study. This can include using well-designed
questionnaires, using random sampling methods, and double-checking the
data for accuracy.
Software used in quantitative data collection:
Quantitative data collection software refers to computer programs that are
used to collect, store, and analyze numerical data in quantitative research.
Some common types of quantitative data collection software include:
Surveys and questionnaires: Software programs such as Qualtrics,
SurveyMonkey, and Google Forms are used to design, administer, and analyze
surveys and questionnaires. These programs can be used to create and
distribute online surveys, track responses, and generate reports.
78
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Statistical analysis software: Programs such as SPSS, SAS, and R are used to
analyze numerical data and perform statistical tests. These programs can be
used to perform descriptive statistics, hypothesis testing, regression analysis,
and other types of statistical analysis.
Data collection apps: Data collection apps, such as ODK and SurveyCTO, are
used to collect data on mobile devices. These apps can be used to collect data
in the field, offline, and in real-time.
Web analytics software: Programs such as Google Analytics and Adobe
Analytics are used to collect and analyze data about website traffic, user
behaviour, and other metrics. This type of software can be used to understand
consumer behaviour, improve website design, and measure the success of
online campaigns.
These software programs can streamline the data collection process, reduce
the risk of data entry errors, and provide powerful tools for data analysis.
However, it is important to choose software that is appropriate for the
research question and data collection method and to ensure that the software
is used correctly to avoid compromising the validity of the results.
Qualitative methodology:
This involves collecting and analysing non-numerical data to gain an
understanding of social phenomena. Qualitative methods include interviews,
focus groups, and observation.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
79
Methodology & Data Collection
Mixed-methods methodology: This involves using both quantitative and
qualitative methods in the same study. This can provide a more
comprehensive understanding of a topic, as it allows for triangulation of data.
Experimental methodology: This involves manipulating an independent
variable to observe its effect on a dependent variable. Experiments can be
conducted in a controlled environment, such as a laboratory, or in a natural
setting.
Survey methodology: This involves collecting data through self-administered
questionnaires or interviews. Surveys can be conducted in person, by mail, or
online.
Case study methodology: This involves a deep, in-depth examination of a
single individual, group, or event. Case studies are often used to explore
complex social issues and can provide a rich source of data.
It is important to choose a methodology that is appropriate for the research
question and the type of data needed. The methodology should also be
feasible, ethical, and able to produce valid and reliable results.
Data collection refers to the process of gathering information for the purpose
of conducting research. The methods used for data collection can vary
depending on the research design, the research question, and the type of data
needed. Common data collection methods include surveys, interviews,
observations, and secondary data sources such as government reports or
previous studies. It is important to choose appropriate methods that are
80
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
aligned with the research objectives and questions, and that will result in
accurate and trustworthy data.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
81
Methodology & Data Collection
82
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
CHAPTER 5
Writing the Introduction
and Background of
Thesis
The introduction and background of a thesis serves to provide a context for
the research problem being investigated and to explain why the study is
significant and relevant.
Introduction:
1. Start with a general overview of the field of study and narrow down to the
specific research topic.
2. Clearly state the research question or problem.
3. Provide an overview of the thesis structure.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
83
Writing the Introduction and Background of Thesis
Introduction chapter of a thesis should have the following elements:
1. Context: Provide a brief overview of the field of study and introduce the
research topic.
2. Problem Statement: Clearly state the research problem or question being
investigated.
3. Significance: Explain why the research is important and relevant, including
its theoretical and practical implications.
4. Background: Give a brief overview of the existing literature on the topic,
including previous studies and relevant theories.
5. Research Objectives: Clearly state the specific goals of the research and how
they will be achieved.
6. Scope and Limitations: Outline the scope of the study, including the boundaries of the research and any limitations that may impact the results.
7. Thesis Outline: Provide an overview of the structure of the thesis, including
the main sections and chapters.
It is important to write an introduction that is engaging, clearly states the
research problem, and sets the stage for the rest of the thesis.
84
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Context Section:
In the context section of the introduction of a thesis, the following
information should be included:
1. Overview of the field of study: Give a broad description of the area of
research, highlighting its importance and relevance.
An overview of the field of study in the context section of a thesis should
provide a brief and accessible description of the area of research and its
significance. The following steps can help guide you in writing an effective
overview of the field of study:
a. Define the field of study: Clearly define the area of research and its
boundaries.
b. Highlight its importance: Explain why the field of study is relevant and
important, both theoretically and practically.
c. Provide context: Give a brief historical overview of the field of study,
highlighting its development over time.
d. Identify current trends and challenges: Discuss the current state of the field,
including any current trends, challenges, or controversies.
e. Explain its relevance to other fields: If applicable, explain how the field of
study relates to or interacts with other fields.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
85
Writing the Introduction and Background of Thesis
f. Conclude the overview: Summarize the main points and reiterate the
importance of the field of study.
It is important to write the overview of the field of study in a way that is clear,
concise, and accessible to a general audience, while still providing enough
information to establish the significance of the research.
2. Narrowing down to the research topic: Focus on the specific aspect of the
field that the thesis will address.
To narrow down a research topic in the context section of a thesis, the
following steps can be helpful:
a. Identify the broad field of study: Establish the general area of research that
the thesis will address.
b. Specify the research topic: Narrow down the field of study to a specific
aspect that the thesis will investigate.
c. Explain why the research topic is important: Highlight the significance of
the research topic and why it is worth investigating.
d. Provide context for the research topic: Give a brief overview of the existing
research on the topic, including any relevant theories, studies, or findings.
e. Identify the research gap: Explain what gap in the existing knowledge the
current research aims to fill, and why the gap is significant.
86
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
f. Conclude the narrow-down of the research topic: Summarize the main
points and emphasize the importance of the specific research topic being
addressed.
It is important to be clear and concise in narrowing down the research topic,
and to provide enough information to establish its significance and relevance
to the field of study. This will help the reader understand why the research is
important and what the research aims to accomplish.
3. Relevance of the research topic: Explain why the research topic is significant
and worth investigating.
To write the relevance of the research topic in the context section of a thesis,
the following steps can be helpful:
a. Explain the practical significance: Highlight how the research topic impacts
real-world problems, issues, or challenges.
b. Identify the theoretical significance: Discuss how the research contributes to
advancing knowledge and understanding within the field of study.
c. Address any gaps in the existing knowledge: Explain what gap in the existing
knowledge the current research aims to fill and why filling this gap is
important.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
87
Writing the Introduction and Background of Thesis
d. Highlight the implications of the research: Discuss how the findings of the
research could be applied or used in the future.
e. Explain the relevance to other fields: If applicable, explain how the research
relates to or impacts other fields.
f. Conclude the relevance section: Summarize the main points and emphasize
the significance and importance of the research topic.
It is important to be clear and concise in writing the relevance of the research
topic, and to provide enough information to establish its significance and
impact. This will help the reader understand why the research is important and
why it deserves attention.
4. Research gap: Highlight the gap in the existing knowledge that the current
research aims to fill.
Identifying the research gap in the context section of a thesis involves
identifying a lack of knowledge or understanding in the existing research on
the topic. The following steps can help guide you in identifying the research
gap:
a. Review the existing literature: Thoroughly review the existing research on
the topic, including relevant theories, studies, and findings.
88
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
b. Identify the key questions: Determine what questions the existing research
has addressed, and what questions remain unanswered.
c. Evaluate the existing research: Assess the strengths and limitations of the
existing research, and identify any gaps or areas in which more information is
needed.
d. Define the research gap: Clearly define the gap in the existing knowledge or
understanding that the current research aims to fill.
e. Explain the significance of the gap: Discuss why filling the gap in the existing knowledge is important, and how it will contribute to advancing knowledge and understanding in the field of study.
f. Conclude the research gap section: Summarize the main points and
emphasize the significance of the research gap.
It is important to be clear and concise in identifying the research gap, and to
provide enough information to establish its significance and impact. This will
help the reader understand the purpose and importance of the research.
The purpose of the context section is to provide the reader with a general
understanding of the field of study and the specific research topic being
investigated, and to explain why the study is relevant and important. The
context should be written in a way that is accessible to readers who are not
experts in the field, but still provides enough detail to establish the background
and significance of the research.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
89
Writing the Introduction and Background of Thesis
The following information should not be included in the context section of the
introduction:
1. Detailed literature review: The context section should provide a broad
overview of the field of study and relevant research, but a detailed literature
review should be reserved for later sections of the thesis.
2. Personal opinions: The context section should present objective
information about the field of study and the research topic and avoid personal
opinions or subjective interpretations.
3. Unrelated information: The context section should be focused on providing
relevant information about the field of study and the research topic and avoid
including information that is not directly related to the research.
4. Overly technical language: The context section should be written in a clear
and accessible language, avoiding overly technical terms or jargon that may not
be familiar to a general audience.
It is important to write the context section in a way that is clear, concise, and
focused on the research topic, avoiding information that is not directly
relevant or that may distract from the main purpose of the section.
90
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Background:
1. Provide a thorough review of relevant literature, including previous studies
and relevant theories.
A general review of the literature in the background chapter of the introduction of a thesis should provide an overview of the existing research on the
topic, highlighting key theories, studies, and findings. The following steps can
help guide you in writing a general review of literature:
a. Identify the key themes: Determine the main themes that have emerged in
the existing research on the topic.
b. Highlight the main findings: Summarize the key findings of the existing
research, including any trends, patterns, or conclusions.
c. Evaluate the existing research: Assess the strengths and limitations of the
existing research and identify any gaps or areas in which more information is
needed.
d. Discuss the relevance to the current research: Explain how the existing
research relates to or impacts the current research.
e. Explain the significance of the existing research: Discuss why the existing
research is important and why it deserves attention.
f. Conclude the general review of literature: Summarize the main points and
emphasize the significance of the existing research and its relevance to the
current research.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
91
Writing the Introduction and Background of Thesis
It is important to write the general review of literature in a way that is clear,
concise, and accessible to a general audience, while still providing enough
information to establish the significance of the existing research and its
relevance to the current research.
2. Highlight the gap in the existing knowledge that the current research aims to
fill.
To highlight the gap in the existing knowledge that the current research aims
to fill, you can follow these steps in the background chapter of the
introduction of your thesis:
a. Review the existing literature: Thoroughly review the existing research on
the topic, including relevant theories, studies, and findings.
b. Identify the key questions: Determine what questions the existing research
has addressed, and what questions remain unanswered.
c. Evaluate the existing research: Assess the strengths and limitations of the
existing research and identify any gaps or areas in which more information is
needed.
d. Define the research gap: Clearly define the gap in the existing knowledge or
understanding that the current research aims to fill.
92
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
e. Explain the significance of the gap: Discuss why filling the gap in the
existing knowledge is important, and how it will contribute to advancing
knowledge and understanding in the field of study.
f. Relate the gap to the current research: Explain how the research gap relates
to the research question or objective of the current study.
g. Conclude the gap section: Summarize the main points and emphasize the
significance of the research gap and its relevance to the current research.
It is important to be clear and concise in highlighting the gap in the existing
knowledge, and to provide enough information to establish its significance and
impact. This will help the reader understand the purpose and importance of
the current research.
3. Explain the significance of the research, including its theoretical and
practical implications.
The significance of the research refers to the importance or impact of the
study in terms of advancing knowledge and understanding in a particular field
or contributing to the solution of a specific problem. To explain the
significance of the research, including its theoretical and practical implications,
you can follow these steps in the introduction of your thesis:
a. Theoretical implications: Discuss how the research advances our
understanding of the topic or adds to existing theories. Explain how the
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
93
Writing the Introduction and Background of Thesis
findings contribute to existing knowledge and what new insights or
perspectives are provided.
b. Practical implications: Discuss how the research can be applied or used to
solve practical problems or improve real-world situations. Explain how the
findings can be used to inform policies, improve processes, or advance
technologies.
c. Relevance to the field: Discuss why the research is important and relevant to
the field of study, and how it contributes to the advancement of knowledge
and understanding.
d. Relevance to society: Discuss how the research benefits society, either
directly or indirectly, and how it addresses specific societal needs or problems.
e. Limitations and future research: Discuss the limitations of the current
research and what future research is needed to build on the findings.
It is important to be clear and concise in explaining the significance of the
research, and to provide enough information to establish its impact and
relevance. This will help the reader understand the importance of the study
and its potential implications.
4. Provide a clear and concise explanation of the research objectives and
hypotheses, if any.
To provide a clear and concise explanation of the research objectives and
hypotheses, you can follow these steps in the introduction of your thesis:
94
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
a. Define the research objectives: Clearly state the overall aim of the research,
what you hope to achieve or what questions you hope to answer.
b. State the research questions: Clearly state the specific questions that the
research aims to address and explain why these questions are important.
c. Formulate the hypotheses: If applicable, formulate testable hypotheses that
outline the expected relationships or outcomes of the research.
d. Explain the significance of the objectives and hypotheses: Discuss how the
research objectives and hypotheses advance our understanding of the topic
and contribute to the field of study.
e. Provide context for the research: Provide a brief overview of the
background and context for the research, including any relevant theories,
studies, or findings.
f. Conclude the objectives and hypotheses section: Summarize the main points
and emphasize the significance and importance of the research objectives and
hypotheses.
It is important to be clear and concise in defining the research objectives and
hypotheses, and to provide enough information to establish their significance
and relevance to the study. This will help the reader understand the focus and
direction of the research.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
95
Writing the Introduction and Background of Thesis
It is important to ensure that the introduction and background are clearly written and provide a clear foundation for the rest of the thesis.
96
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
CHAPTER 6
Presenting the Findings
and Analysis
To present the findings of your research, you can follow these steps in your
thesis:
Organizing findings
1.
Organize the findings: Organize the findings in a logical and coherent
manner, based on the research objectives, hypotheses, and
methodology.
Organizing the findings of your research in a logical and coherent manner
based on the research objectives, hypotheses, and methodology involves the
following steps:
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
97
Presenting the Findings and Analysis
a. Start with the research objectives: Review the research objectives and
determine which results are most relevant to each objective.
b. Group related findings: Group related findings together based on the
research objectives and hypotheses. For example, if you have several
hypotheses, present the results of each hypothesis separately.
c. Use headings and subheadings: Use headings and subheadings to clearly and
concisely present the results. This will help the reader to quickly understand
the structure and organization of the results.
d. Use tables, graphs, and figures: Use tables, graphs, and figures to present the
results in an accessible and visually appealing manner. Be sure to label and
caption the tables, graphs, and figures, and to explain how to interpret the
results.
e. Explain the methodology: Provide a brief explanation of the methodology
used to gather and analyze the results. This will help the reader understand
how the results were obtained and what limitations or biases may have
influenced the findings.
f. Avoid bias: Avoid presenting the results in a biased manner and be sure to
present the results objectively and accurately.
g. Keep the results concise: Keep the results concise, focusing on the most
important and relevant findings. Avoid repeating information or presenting
results that are not significant or relevant to the study.
98
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
By organizing the findings in a logical and coherent manner based on the
research objectives, hypotheses, and methodology, you can help the reader
understand the results and appreciate the significance of the research. This will
increase the overall impact and credibility of the study.
1. Describe the findings: Describe the results of your analysis in detail,
using tables, graphs, and figures if appropriate. Be sure to clearly and
accurately present the results and to provide enough information for
the reader to understand the findings.
When describing the findings of a research, it is important to present the
results in a clear, organized, and objective manner. The findings should be
reported in a way that is easy to understand and relevant to the research
questions being investigated.
It is common to include tables, graphs, and other visual aids to help present
the data, and to provide a summary of the key findings in the text. When
interpreting the results, it is important to be cautious and avoid overstating the
conclusions that can be drawn from the data. The limitations of the study
should also be acknowledged and discussed.
Overall, the description of research findings should be thorough, accurate, and
evidence-based, and should clearly communicate the implications of the results
for the field of study and for practical applications.
2. Interpret the findings: Interpret the findings and explain what they
mean in terms of the research objectives and hypotheses. Discuss how
the results support or challenge existing theories and perspectives.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
99
Presenting the Findings and Analysis
Interpreting the findings of a research involves analysing the results and
making sense of them in the context of the research question and hypotheses
being tested. This involves considering the implications of the results, both in
terms of the theory being tested and in terms of their practical applications.
When interpreting findings, it is important to consider the limitations of the
study, such as the sample size, the methods used to collect the data, and any
potential sources of bias or confounding variables. These limitations can
impact the generalizability of the results and should be taken into account
when making conclusions.
It is also important to consider the strength and magnitude of the relationships
between variables and whether they are statistically significant. The interpretation of results should be based on the evidence presented in the data, and not
on preconceived notions or personal opinions.
Overall, the interpretation of research findings should be careful, evidencebased, and supported by the data. Conclusions should be clearly stated and
justified, and the implications of the results for the field of study and for
practical applications should be discussed.
1. Evaluate the findings: Evaluate the quality and reliability of the results
and discuss any limitations or biases that may have influenced the
findings.
Evaluating the quality and reliability of research results is an important step in
determining the validity and generalizability of the findings. This involves
assessing various aspects of the research design and methodology, as well as
the results themselves, to determine if the results are robust and can be trusted.
100
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
When evaluating the quality and reliability of research results, it is important to
consider the following factors:
1. Study Design: Was the study design appropriate for answering the research
question? Were appropriate control groups used? Were potential confounding
variables controlled for?
2. Sample Size: Was the sample size large enough to provide reliable results?
Were the participants selected in a way that minimizes selection bias?
3. Data Collection Methods: Were the data collection methods appropriate and
reliable? Were the measures used to collect the data valid and reliable?
4. Data Analysis Methods: Were the data analysis methods appropriate and
appropriate statistical tests used to test the research hypotheses? Were the
results of the tests correctly interpreted?
5. Replicability: Have the results been replicated by other studies? Are the
results consistent with previous research on the same topic?
6. External Validity: Do the results generalize to the larger population? Were
the participants representative of the population being studied?
Overall, evaluating the quality and reliability of research results is an important
step in determining the validity and generalizability of the findings, and helps
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
101
Presenting the Findings and Analysis
to ensure that the results can be trusted and used to inform future research and
decision-making.
Conclusions
1. Draw conclusions: Draw conclusions based on the results and discuss
how the findings contribute to advancing knowledge and
understanding in the field of study.
Drawing conclusions from research involves synthesizing the results and
making inferences about the relationship between the variables being studied.
This involves analysing the data and determining the implications of the results
for the research question and hypotheses being tested.
When drawing conclusions, it is important to consider the limitations of the
study and the potential sources of bias and confounding variables that may
have impacted the results. The results should be interpreted in light of the
evidence presented in the data, and conclusions should be supported by the
data and not based on preconceived notions or personal opinions.
It is also important to consider the strength and magnitude of the relationships
between variables and whether they are statistically significant. The results
should be placed in the context of previous research on the topic, and the
implications for future research should be discussed.
Overall, drawing conclusions from research requires careful interpretation of
the data and consideration of the limitations and strengths of the study design
102
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
and methodology. Conclusions should be evidence-based, supported by the
data, and clearly stated and justified.
When drawing conclusions from research, it is important to take certain
precautions to ensure that the conclusions are valid and reliable. Some of these
precautions include:
a. Consider the Limitations of the Study: Be aware of the limitations of the
study, such as the sample size, the methods used to collect the data, and any
potential sources of bias or confounding variables. Take these limitations into
account when making conclusions.
b. Be Evidence-Based: Base conclusions on the evidence presented in the data,
and not on preconceived notions or personal opinions. The results should be
supported by the data, and not overstated or exaggerated.
c. Consider Replicability: Have the results been replicated by other studies?
Are the results consistent with previous research on the same topic? The more
consistent the results, the more confidence you can have in the conclusions.
d. Avoid Confirmation Bias: Be cautious of confirmation bias, which is the
tendency to interpret evidence in a way that supports preconceived beliefs or
hypotheses. Consider alternative explanations for the results and be open to
the possibility that the results may not support your expectations.
Confirmation bias can be avoided by adopting the following strategies:
1. Seek out and consider alternative perspectives: Try to understand and fairly
evaluate arguments that go against your beliefs.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
103
Presenting the Findings and Analysis
2. Be open to changing your mind: Be willing to revise or abandon your beliefs
in light of new evidence or better arguments.
3. Challenge your assumptions: Regularly question and reflect on the reasons
for your beliefs, especially when faced with new information.
4. Be aware of your emotions: Confirmation bias is often driven by emotions
like fear, anger, or excitement, so it's important to recognize when your
emotions are influencing your thinking.
5. Seek out disconfirming evidence: Make a deliberate effort to seek out
evidence that contradicts your beliefs, rather than only seeking out information
that confirms them.
Seek the input of others: Seek the opinions of people with different
perspectives, especially when making important decisions.
e. Consider the Implications: Consider the implications of the results for the
research question and hypotheses being tested, as well as for future research
and practical applications. Be aware of the limitations of the generalizability of
the results and the potential for Type I and Type II errors.
Type I and Type II errors are errors that can occur in statistical hypothesis
testing.
104
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Type I Error
Type I error, also known as a false positive, occurs when a null hypothesis is
rejected when it is actually true. In other words, it's a mistake in concluding
that there is an effect (such as a significant difference between two groups)
when there is none. The probability of making a Type I error is denoted by
alpha (α) and is often set at 0.05, meaning that there is a 5% chance of making
a false positive.
Type II Error
Type II error, also known as a false negative, occurs when a null hypothesis is
not rejected when it is actually false. In other words, it's a mistake in failing to
detect an effect that is actually present. The probability of making a Type II
error is denoted by beta (β) and is often set at 0.20, meaning that there is a
20% chance of making a false negative.
Both Type I and Type II errors are trade-offs in hypothesis testing and can
never be completely eliminated. A more stringent alpha (lower probability of a
Type I error) increases the likelihood of making a Type II error, and vice versa.
The choice of alpha and beta levels depends on the consequences of the errors
in the specific context and field of study.
Overall, taking these precautions when drawing conclusions from research
helps to ensure that the conclusions are valid, reliable, and based on the
evidence presented in the data.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
105
Presenting the Findings and Analysis
1. Recommendations: Provide recommendations for future research
based on the results and discuss how the findings can be applied or
used in real-world settings.
General suggestions for research recommendation:
1. Make it relevant: Recommendations should be tailored to the individual,
taking into account their unique needs, interests, and preferences.
2. Offer a variety of options: Provide a range of options to consider, rather
than just a single recommendation. This gives the recipient a choice and helps
them feel more in control.
3. Provide clear explanations: Make sure the recipient understands why each
recommendation is being made and how it will meet their needs.
4. Consider the context: Take into account the current situation, timing, and
other relevant factors when making recommendations.
5. Be confident but humble: Be confident in your recommendations, but also
be open to feedback and alternative perspectives. Be willing to admit when you
don't have all the answers.
6. Use data and research: Where possible, support your recommendations with
data, research, or case studies that demonstrate the benefits of your suggestion.
106
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
7. Follow up: After making a recommendation, follow up with the recipient to
see if they have any questions or concerns, and to gauge their level of
satisfaction with your suggestion.
It is important to be clear, concise, and accurate in presenting the findings, and
to provide enough information for the reader to understand the results and
their implications. This will help the reader appreciate the significance of the
research and the contributions it makes to the field of study.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
107
Presenting the Findings and Analysis
108
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
CHAPTER 7
Writing Discussion and
Conclusion section of
Thesis
The Discussion and Conclusion sections of a thesis are the places where you
summarize the main findings of your research and reflect on their implications.
The Discussion section should start with a brief summary of your results, then
move on to interpret what these results mean in the context of existing
literature and theories. Here, you should also discuss the limitations of your
research and explain why your results are significant.
The Conclusion section should summarize the main findings of your research,
restate the research questions, and discuss the practical and theoretical
implications of your results. You can also highlight any areas for future
research and emphasize the contribution of your study to the field.
It is important to write these sections with clarity and conciseness, using
language that is appropriate for your audience. Make sure to carefully
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
109
Writing Discussion and Conclusion section of Thesis
proofread and edit both sections, as they are crucial to the overall impact and
perception of your thesis.
The discussion section of a thesis should include the following elements:
1. Summary of results: A brief overview of the main findings of your research.
2. Interpretation of results: An analysis of what your results mean in the
context of existing literature and theories.
3. Limitations: A discussion of any limitations or limitations of your research,
and how they may have affected your results.
4. Significance: An explanation of why your results are important and what
they contribute to the field.
5. Comparison with other studies: A comparison of your results with those of
other studies in the field, highlighting similarities and differences.
6. Implications: A discussion of the practical and theoretical implications of
your results, including any recommendations for future research.
7. Conclusions: A conclusion that ties together the main points of your
discussion and highlights the significance of your results.
110
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
It's important to write the discussion section in a clear, concise, and wellorganized manner, using language that is appropriate for your audience. You
should also avoid introducing new information in the discussion section, and
instead focus on interpreting and synthesizing the results that you have already
presented.
Preparing summary of Results
To prepare a summary of results for the discussion section of your thesis, you
should:
a. Review your results: Re-read your results section and make note of the key
findings.
b. Organize your findings: Group your findings into themes or categories to
make it easier to summarize.
c. Identify the main results: Select the most important findings and summarize
them in a concise manner.
d. Present the data: Choose the most appropriate way to present your data,
whether it's in the form of tables, figures, or text.
e. Focus on the main message: Ensure that the summary focuses on the main
message of your results, rather than the details.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
111
Writing Discussion and Conclusion section of Thesis
f. Keep it brief: Limit your summary to a few paragraphs or a page, depending
on the length and complexity of your results.
g. Write clearly: Use clear, concise language and avoid technical terms or
jargon.
It's important to remember that the summary of results should provide a clear
and concise overview of your findings, without going into too much detail.
The goal is to provide a clear picture of what your research has discovered, and
to set the stage for the interpretation and analysis in the rest of the discussion
section.
Review of the Results
To review the results of your research, you should:
1. Re-read the results section: Go through your results section carefully, paying
close attention to the details of your findings.
2. Take notes: Make notes on what you observe and what the results show.
3. Check for consistency: Ensure that your results are consistent with your
research questions, hypotheses, and methodology.
112
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
To check for consistency in the results of your research, you should:
Compare results with research questions and hypotheses: Ensure that the
results are consistent with the research questions and hypotheses that you
developed at the start of your study.
a. Look for discrepancies: Check for any discrepancies between the results and
what you expected to find.
b. Consider the methodology: Ensure that the results are consistent with the
methodology you used to collect and analyze the data.
c. Check for internal consistency: Ensure that the results are consistent with
each other, and that there are no contradictions or unexpected findings.
d. Verify data: Check that the data used to generate the results is accurate and
reliable.
e. Use appropriate statistical tests: Ensure that the statistical tests you used are
appropriate for the data and the research questions you are trying to answer.
f. Review previous studies: Compare your results with those of previous
studies in the field to see if they are consistent with what others have found.
By checking for consistency in the results, you can ensure that the findings are
robust and trustworthy. Any inconsistencies or discrepancies should be
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
113
Writing Discussion and Conclusion section of Thesis
addressed in the discussion section, and you may need to modify your
interpretation of the results or the conclusions you draw.
4. Verify accuracy: Make sure that your results are accurate and that any data or
calculations are correct.
To verify the accuracy of the results of your research, you should:
a. Check data: Ensure that the data used to generate the results is accurate,
complete, and properly recorded.
b. Validate methods: Validate the methods used to collect and analyze the data
to ensure that they are appropriate and accurate.
c. Use appropriate statistical tests: Ensure that the statistical tests used are
appropriate for the data and the research questions being addressed.
d. Double-check calculations: Double-check all calculations, particularly if they
were done by hand or using a spreadsheet.
e. Review previous studies: Compare your results with those of previous
studies in the field to see if they are consistent with what others have found.
114
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
f. Consult with peers or experts: Discuss your results with peers or experts in
the field to see if they agree with your findings and to identify any potential
inaccuracies or issues.
g. Replicate the study: Consider replicating the study using the same or similar
methods to confirm the accuracy of the results.
Accuracy is important in research because it helps to ensure that the findings
are trustworthy and reliable. By verifying the accuracy of the results, you can
increase the confidence that others will have in the conclusions you draw from
your research.
5. Look for patterns: Identify any patterns or trends in the results that may
indicate a relationship or cause-and-effect relationship.
To look for patterns in research, you should:
a. Visualize the data: Plot the data in a graph or chart to help you see any
patterns or trends.
Data visualization is a way of representing data in a graphical or pictorial form.
It can help to reveal patterns, relationships, and trends in the data that may not
be immediately apparent from raw numbers or text-based representations.
Some common types of data visualizations include:
Bar graphs: Used to compare data across categories.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
115
Writing Discussion and Conclusion section of Thesis
Line graphs: Used to show changes over time or the relationship between two
variables.
Scatter plots: Used to show the relationship between two variables.
Histograms: Used to show the distribution of data.
Pie charts: Used to show the proportion of data in different categories.
Box plots: Used to show the distribution of data and identify outliers.
Heat maps: Used to show the relationship between two variables across a twodimensional grid.
Data visualization can help to make complex data more accessible and easier
to understand and is a valuable tool for both exploratory data analysis and
communicating research results to others. When creating data visualizations,
it's important to consider factors such as the type of data, the audience, and
the message you are trying to convey.
b. Identify relationships: Look for relationships between variables or between
different sets of data.
To identify relationships, you can use several methods, such as:
116
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
a. Observation: Observe the behaviour and interactions between individuals to
identify patterns and relationships.
b. Communication: Ask questions and engage in communication to gather
information about the relationships.
c. Data analysis: Analyze data.
d. Commonalities: Look for common characteristics, experiences, or interests
that may indicate a relationship.
e. Context: Consider the social, cultural, and historical context in which the
relationships exist to gain a better understanding.
f. Expert knowledge: Consult with experts or professionals who have
knowledge or experience in the area to gain insights into relationships.
g. Patterns and Trends: Look for patterns and trends in data, behaviour, or
communication that can reveal relationships.
Ultimately, identifying relationships requires paying attention to details, asking
questions, and using a combination of methods to gain a complete
understanding.
c. Group data: Group the data into categories or clusters to see if any patterns
emerge.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
117
Writing Discussion and Conclusion section of Thesis
Grouping data involves organizing data into categories or groups based on
certain characteristics or attributes. This helps to simplify and make sense of
large amounts of data. Some common methods of grouping data include:
Sorting: Arranging data in a particular order, such as alphabetically,
numerically, or chronologically.
Binning: Dividing data into equal-sized intervals or ranges, also known as
"buckets" or "bins".
Clustering: Using statistical algorithms to group similar data points together
into clusters.
Stratification: Dividing data into subgroups based on specific criteria, such as
age, gender, or income.
Segmentation: Dividing a larger group into smaller, more homogeneous
subgroups based on common characteristics.
Dimension reduction: Reducing the number of variables or dimensions in a
dataset to simplify it and make it easier to understand.
The method used to group data depends on the type of data, the purpose of
the analysis, and the specific goals of the analysis.
118
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
d. Use statistical techniques: Use statistical techniques, such as regression
analysis or clustering methods, to identify patterns in the data.
e. Check for outliers: Identify any data points that are significantly different
from the rest of the data and determine whether they are meaningful or not.
Outliers should be checked for several reasons:
Impact on statistical analysis: Outliers can significantly impact the results of
statistical analysis and skew the results, leading to incorrect conclusions.
Data Quality: Outliers may indicate errors in the data collection process,
measurement errors, or data entry errors.
Unusual observations: Outliers may represent unusual observations or events
that may require further investigation.
Influence on models: Outliers can have a disproportionate impact on
predictive models, leading to incorrect predictions.
Identification of trends and patterns: Outliers can provide valuable
information about trends and patterns in the data.
Therefore, it is important to check for outliers and understand their potential
impact on the analysis before drawing any conclusions. This can be done
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
119
Writing Discussion and Conclusion section of Thesis
through visual inspection, such as creating box plots or scatter plots, or
through statistical methods, such as Z-scores or interquartile ranges.
f. Consider the context: Consider the context in which the data was collected
and whether there may be any external factors that could be affecting the
results.
Considering the context in which data was collected is important because it
can provide valuable insights into the data and help to interpret the results
correctly. Some of the key factors to consider include:
Data collection methods: Understanding the methods used to collect the data
can help to assess the accuracy and reliability of the data.
Data collection methods refer to the strategies used to gather information and
create a dataset. Some common data collection methods include:
Surveys: Collecting information through self-administered questionnaires,
either online, by mail, or in-person.
Interviews: Collecting information through face-to-face or telephone
conversations with individuals.
Observations: Collecting information by observing individuals, events, or
phenomena.
Experiments: Collecting information by manipulating one or more variables
and measuring the effect on other variables.
120
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Secondary data: Collecting information from existing sources, such as
government statistics, published research studies, or online databases.
Focus groups: Collecting information through group discussions or interviews.
Logs and diaries: Collecting information by keeping track of events, activities,
or observations over time.
The choice of data collection method depends on the research question, the
type of data needed, the resources available, and ethical considerations. It is
important to choose the most appropriate method to ensure the accuracy and
reliability of the data.
Sample size: The sample size of the data can impact the representativeness of
the data and the conclusions that can be drawn from it.
The sample size is an important factor in statistical analysis as it can impact the
validity and reliability of the results. Here are some ways in which the sample
size can play a role:
Representativeness: A larger sample size increases the representativeness of
the data, meaning that the sample more accurately represents the population
from which it was drawn.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
121
Writing Discussion and Conclusion section of Thesis
Precision: A larger sample size increases the precision of statistical estimates,
meaning that the results are more likely to be close to the true population
parameters.
Statistical power: A larger sample size increases the statistical power of a study,
meaning that it is more likely to detect a real effect if one exists.
Error reduction: A larger sample size can reduce the standard error of
estimates and increase the reliability of the results.
Generalizability: A larger sample size increases the generalizability of the
results, meaning that the findings can be more confidently applied to the
population as a whole.
However, a larger sample size is not always necessary, and the appropriate
sample size depends on the specific research question and the level of
precision required. The trade-off between sample size and cost, time, and
resources must be considered.
To calculate sample size, you need to consider the following factors:
Population size: The total number of individuals in the population you want to
study.
Confidence level: The degree of certainty you want in your results, typically
expressed as a percentage (e.g., 95%)
Margin of error: The amount of error you are willing to accept in your results.
Response distribution: An estimate of how the responses to your question are
likely to be distributed (e.g., normal, uniform, etc.)
122
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Once you have this information, you can use a sample size calculator or a
formula to determine the appropriate sample size. The most common formula
used is the one given by Robert N. Webb:
n = (Z^2 * p * (1-p)) / E^2
where:
n = sample size
Z = Z-score for your desired confidence level (e.g. 1.96 for 95% confidence)
p = estimated proportion of individuals in the population who will respond in
a certain way
E = desired margin of error
It's important to note that sample size calculation is an estimate and may not
always be accurate. The actual sample size needed can be affected by a variety
of factors such as response rate, non-response bias, and others.
Data collection time frame: The time frame in which data was collected can
impact the relevance and applicability of the data.
The ideal data collection time frame for a PhD thesis will vary depending on
the specific research project and its requirements. However, some general
guidelines are:
Consider the timeline of your overall research project: Make sure that data
collection fits within the timeline of the overall project and leaves sufficient
time for data analysis, interpretation, and writing.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
123
Writing Discussion and Conclusion section of Thesis
Allow for adequate preparation: Before collecting data, make sure you have a
well-designed study plan, including a detailed protocol, informed consent
process, and necessary approvals.
Consider the nature of the data: Depending on the type of data you are
collecting (e.g. surveys, interviews, observational studies, etc.), you may need
to allow for different lengths of time for data collection. For example, surveys
may be quicker to administer than interviews, while observational studies may
take longer to complete.
Allow for contingencies: Make sure to allow for unanticipated events that may
impact data collection, such as illness or equipment failure.
In general, a PhD thesis project may take several years to complete, and data
collection is likely to take place over several months to a year. However, the
exact time frame will depend on the specific research project and its
requirements.
Data source: The source of the data can impact the credibility and reliability of
the data.
Population: Understanding the population that the data represents can help to
assess the generalizability of the data.
Selection bias: Checking for potential selection bias, such as non-random
sampling, can help to assess the representativeness of the data.
124
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
External factors: Understanding external factors, such as changes in the
economy, technology, or laws, can help to interpret the data correctly.
By considering the context in which the data was collected, it is possible to
gain a deeper understanding of the data and make more informed decisions
based on the data.
g. Repeat the analysis: Repeat the analysis using different techniques or subsets
of the data to confirm any patterns that you observe.
The goal of looking for patterns in research is to identify relationships or
trends that may indicate a cause-and-effect relationship or provide insights
into the underlying processes at work. By looking for patterns, you can gain a
deeper understanding of the data and make more informed conclusions about
your results.
6. Consider alternative explanations: Think about any alternative explanations
for your results and how they might affect your interpretation.
Considering alternative explanations is an important part of the scientific
process. It helps to ensure that conclusions are based on evidence and are not
biased by preconceived ideas. When considering alternative explanations, you
should:
Identify potential alternative explanations: Brainstorm a list of possible
explanations for the results you have obtained.
Evaluate the evidence: Assess the strength of the evidence for each alternative
explanation and compare it to the evidence for your preferred explanation.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
125
Writing Discussion and Conclusion section of Thesis
Consider the implications: Think about the implications of each alternative
explanation and how they would impact your overall conclusions.
Seek additional evidence: If necessary, collect additional data to test the
alternative explanations and strengthen your conclusion.
Communicate your findings: Clearly and objectively present the evidence for
each explanation and the reasoning behind your final conclusion.
By considering alternative explanations, you can reduce the risk of drawing
incorrect conclusions and increase the robustness and reliability of your
results.
9. Evaluate the quality of the results: Assess the quality of the results,
considering factors such as sample size, statistical significance, and the
strength of the relationships observed.
Evaluating the quality of a result depends on the context and the specific
problem being solved. Some general steps for evaluating the quality of results
include:
Define the criteria for success: Establish what you want to achieve and what a
good outcome looks like. This can vary greatly depending on the specific task.
126
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Compare the results to a baseline: Compare the results to a benchmark or
previously established standard. This can help to determine if the results are
better or worse than expected.
Use error metrics: For many tasks, there are specific metrics that can be used
to quantify the error or accuracy of the results. For example, mean squared
error or accuracy score.
Error metrics are mathematical measures used to evaluate the performance of
a model in comparison to the actual target values. Using error metrics allows
you to quantify the difference between the predicted values and the actual
values, giving you a numerical measure of the accuracy of your model.
Here are some common error metrics used in different domains:
Regression problems:
Mean Absolute Error (MAE): the average magnitude of the errors in a set of
predictions.
Mean Squared Error (MSE): the average of the squared differences between
the actual and predicted values.
Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE): the square root of the MSE.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
127
Writing Discussion and Conclusion section of Thesis
Classification problems:
Accuracy: the number of correct predictions made by the model as a
proportion of all predictions.
Precision: the number of true positive predictions divided by the sum of true
positive and false positive predictions.
Recall: the number of true positive predictions divided by the sum of true
positive and false negative predictions.
F1 Score: a weighted average of precision and recall.
Confusion Matrix: a table that displays the number of true positive, true
negative, false positive, and false negative predictions made by the model.
To use error metrics, you need to split your data into training and testing sets.
You train the model on the training set, and then evaluate the model on the
testing set using the error metric of your choice. You can use this information
to choose the best model and to optimize the model's hyperparameters.
Get human feedback: If possible, have people evaluate the results to get an
idea of their perceived quality. This can be especially useful when the results
will be used by people.
Consider additional factors: Depending on the specific task, there may be
additional factors to consider when evaluating the quality of the results, such
as execution time or memory usage.
128
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
It's important to note that quality evaluation should be an ongoing process and
not just a one-time event. The results should be regularly monitored and
updated as necessary.
10. Reflect on any limitations: Consider any limitations or limitations of your
research and how they might have affected your results.
It's important to approach the review process objectively, without
preconceptions or biases, and to be open to the possibility that your results
may not support your initial expectations. The goal of the review is to
understand the results in a thorough and systematic way, and to identify any
potential issues that need to be addressed in the discussion section.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
129
Writing Discussion and Conclusion section of Thesis
130
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
CHAPTER 8
Formatting and
Structuring the Thesis
Formatting and structuring a thesis involve several steps, including:
1. Title page: includes the title of the thesis, your name, the date, and any
other relevant information.
Here is a template for an ideal title page of a thesis:
[Name of the University]
[Department]
[Faculty/School]
[Date of Submission]
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
131
Formatting and Structuring the Thesis
A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE
REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE DEGREE OF [Degree] IN [Field of Study]
[Title of the Thesis]
by
[Your Name]
[Supervisor's Name], [Degree and Title]
[Co-Supervisor's Name], [Degree and Title] (if applicable)
[City], [Country]
Note that the format and content of the title page may vary depending on the
guidelines of the university or department, so it's important to check with
them for the specific requirements.
2. Abstract: a brief summary of the thesis, typically 200-300 words.
The abstract of a PhD thesis should contain the following elements:
132
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Background: A brief introduction to the research topic, including the research
question or problem being addressed.
Objectives: A clear statement of the aims and objectives of the research.
Methodology: A description of the research methods used, including the
sample size, data collection techniques, and data analysis methods.
Results: A summary of the main findings of the research, including any
statistical results and data visualizations.
Conclusion: A brief summary of the main conclusions and implications of the
research, including any recommendations for future work.
Keywords: A list of keywords relevant to the research topic, which can help
with indexing and searching for the thesis.
The abstract should be concise, typically not more than 250-300 words, and
written in a clear and concise manner that is easily understood by a nonspecialist reader. It should also accurately reflect the content of the thesis,
without overstating or understating the results.
3. Table of contents: lists all the chapters and sections of the thesis.
The table of contents (TOC) of a PhD thesis typically includes the following
sections:
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
133
Formatting and Structuring the Thesis
Title page
Abstract
Acknowledgements (optional)
Dedication (optional)
List of Tables (if applicable)
List of Figures (if applicable)
List of Abbreviations (if applicable)
Introduction
Background of the research
Research problem and objectives
Research questions or hypotheses (if applicable)
Scope and significance of the study
Literature review
Overview of existing research in the field
Critical evaluation of relevant studies
Gaps in the literature and justification for the study
Methodology
Research design
Participants or sample selection
Data collection methods
Data analysis methods
134
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Results
Presentation of the findings
Tables, graphs, and other data visualizations (if applicable)
Discussion
Interpretation of the results
Comparison with previous research
Implications and recommendations for future research
Conclusion
Summary of the main findings
Implications and contribution of the research to the field
References
List of all the sources cited in the thesis.
Appendices (if applicable)
Additional material not essential to the main text
The TOC should be comprehensive and reflect the structure and content of
the thesis, making it easy for the reader to navigate and locate specific sections.
The format and level of detail of the TOC may vary depending on the
guidelines of the university or department, so it's important to check with
them for the specific requirements.
4. Introduction: provides an overview of the research problem, objectives, and
methods.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
135
Formatting and Structuring the Thesis
The introduction chapter of a PhD thesis should include the following
elements:
1. Background of the research: A comprehensive overview of the field and
context of the research, highlighting the current state of knowledge and the
research gap being addressed.
2. Research problem and objectives: A clear statement of the research problem
and the specific objectives of the study.
3. Research questions or hypotheses (if applicable): A clear and concise
statement of the research questions or hypotheses that the study aims to
answer or test.
4. Scope and significance of the study: A discussion of the scope and
significance of the study, including its theoretical, practical, and societal
implications.
5. Overview of the thesis: A brief overview of the structure and content of the
thesis, including the chapters and sections to be covered.
The introduction chapter should be written in a clear and concise manner that
is easily understood by a non-specialist reader. It should provide sufficient
context and background information to set the stage for the rest of the thesis,
while clearly and succinctly articulating the research problem and objectives. It
should also provide a roadmap for the rest of the thesis, outlining the main
arguments and themes that will be developed in the subsequent chapters.
136
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
5. Literature review: a critical evaluation of existing research in the field,
relevant to the topic of the thesis.
6. Methodology: a description of the research methods used to collect and
analyze data.
7. Results: a presentation of the findings of the research, including tables,
graphs, and other data visualizations.
8. Discussion: an interpretation of the results and their significance, as well as
any limitations or implications of the study.
9. Conclusion: a summary of the main findings and recommendations for
future research.
10. References: a list of all the sources cited in the thesis, formatted according
to the required citation style.
11. Appendices: any additional material, such as raw data or detailed
explanations, that is not essential to the main text.
It's important to follow the guidelines and requirements specified by your
university or department for the format and structure of a thesis.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
137
Formatting and Structuring the Thesis
138
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
CHAPTER 9
Referencing and
Citations
Referencing and citations are important elements of academic writing and
research. They serve to give credit to the original authors and sources of
information used in a piece of writing and allow others to verify and further
explore the information being presented.
There are several different styles of referencing and citation, each with its own
specific rules and guidelines. Some of the most commonly used styles include:
MLA style
. MLA (Modern Language Association) style, often used in the humanities.
The MLA (Modern Language Association) style is a widely used citation style
for academic writing in the humanities, such as literature, languages, and
cultural studies. Some of the key features of MLA style include:
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
139
Referencing and Citations
In-text citations: MLA uses parenthetical citations within the text to give credit
to the sources used. The citation typically includes the author's last name and
the page number(s) being referenced, for example: (Smith 25).
Works Cited page: At the end of the paper, a Works Cited page lists all of the
sources used in alphabetical order by the author's last name. Each entry in the
Works Cited page provides complete bibliographic information for the source,
including the author, title, publication date, and publisher.
Use of italics: In MLA style, titles of longer works, such as books and films,
should be italicized, while shorter works, such as articles and essays, should be
put in quotation marks.
Use of parenthetical citations: When using a direct quote or paraphrasing
information from a source, the parenthetical citation should come immediately
after the quoted or paraphrased material, before the end punctuation.
Here is an example of an MLA-style citation for a book:
Smith, John. The History of the World. New York: Random House, 2005.
And here is an example of an MLA-style citation for a journal article:
Brown, Jane. "The Importance of Proper Referencing." Journal of Academic Writing, vol. 3,
no. 2, 2002, pp. 42-55.
140
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
It is important to consult the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers
for complete information and guidelines on MLA style, as the rules and format
can change from time to time.
APA style
. APA (American Psychological Association) style, often used in the social
sciences.
APA (American Psychological Association) style is a widely used citation style
for writing and formatting papers in the social sciences. It provides guidelines
for in-text citations, as well as rules for organizing a reference list at the end of
the paper.
In-text citations in APA style should include the author's last name and the
publication year in parentheses. If you quote directly from a source, you also
need to include the page number in the citation.
The reference list at the end of the paper should be alphabetized by the
author's last name and should include the following information for each
source:
. Author's last name, first initial.
. Publication year in parentheses.
. Title of the work.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
141
Referencing and Citations
. Publisher.
Here is an example of an APA style reference for a book:
Smith, J. (2010). The History of Time. New York: Random House.
For more information and specific examples of how to format different types
of sources in APA style, you can refer to the official publication manual of the
American Psychological Association, or you can find numerous online
resources that provide guidelines and examples.
Chicago style
. Chicago style: often used in history.
The Chicago Manual of Style (CMS) is a widely used style guide for writing and
formatting papers in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences.
There are two main citation styles in the Chicago Manual of Style: the notesbibliography (NB) system and the author-date (AD) system.
The notes-bibliography system is commonly used in the humanities and is
characterized by the use of footnotes or endnotes to cite sources, along with a
bibliography at the end of the paper. In-text citations in the notes-bibliography
system include a superscript number that corresponds to a note at the bottom
142
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
of the page or at the end of the paper. Each note provides full publication
information for the source cited.
The author-date system is commonly used in the social sciences and is
characterized by in-text citations that include the author's name, publication
year, and page number(s) in parentheses. A reference list is included at the end
of the paper, and entries are organized alphabetically by the author's last name.
Here is an example of a Chicago style citation in the notes-bibliography
system:
Jane Smith, The History of Time (New York: Random House, 2010), 43.
And here is an example of a Chicago style citation in the author-date system:
1. Smith, Jane. 2010. The History of Time. New York: Random House.
For more information on how to format citations and references in Chicago
style, you can consult the Chicago Manual of Style or find many online
resources that provide guidance and examples.
Harvard style
. Harvard style: This is a widely used generic citation style.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
143
Referencing and Citations
The Harvard referencing style is mainly utilized in the field of education. The
Harvard referencing style includes references in two parts of a written work:
within the text and in a reference, list found at the conclusion. Typically, each
author's name that is mentioned in the text must also be included in the
reference list, and every work listed in the reference list must be cited in the
main text. The accuracy of the reference details, including punctuation, is
important. In Harvard style, in-text references should consist of the author's
surname and the year of publication of the work. If you are quoting or
rephrasing, you should also provide the page number.
Example:
In Text Citation: (Habel 2009)
Reference List entry: Habel, C 2009, 'Academic self-efficacy in ALL: capacity-building
through self-belief', Journal of Academic Language and Learning, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 94-104
IEEE Style.
. IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) style, often used in
engineering and computer science.
IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) style is a citation style
commonly used in the fields of computer science, electrical engineering, and
related disciplines.
144
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
IEEE style follows specific guidelines for in-text citations and reference lists.
In-text citations usually consist of the author's name and publication year, with
page numbers included if directly quoting. The reference list at the end of the
document should be arranged alphabetically by the first author's surname and
should include complete bibliographical information for all sources cited in the
text.
It is important to accurately follow the guidelines of IEEE style in order to
properly acknowledge sources and avoid plagiarism. The IEEE website
provides additional information and resources on using IEEE citation style.
Here is an example of an in-text citation and reference list entry using IEEE
style:
In-text citation:
According to Smith (2010), the use of cloud computing has increased rapidly
in recent years.
Reference list entry:
Smith, J. (2010). The Growth of Cloud Computing. Computer Science Review, 34(5), pp.
78-83.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
145
Referencing and Citations
Note that in IEEE style, the in-text citation includes the author's surname and
publication year, while the reference list entry includes the full name of the
author, publication year, title of the work, journal or book title, volume
number and page numbers.
It's important to carefully follow the guidelines of IEEE style in order to
accurately and properly cite sources in your writing. The IEEE website
provides additional resources and information on using IEEE citation style.
Turabian citation style
Turabian citation style: This is a simplified version of the Chicago citation
style, specifically designed for student writing.
Turabian citation style, also known as Chicago-Turabian style, is a simplified
version of the Chicago citation style. It was developed by Kate L. Turabian,
who was a former graduate school dissertation secretary at the University of
Chicago and is primarily used in the social sciences and humanities for student
writing.
Turabian citation style provides specific guidelines for formatting references
and in-text citations, including the use of footnotes or endnotes for citing
sources, as well as the use of a bibliography page. Some of the key features of
the Turabian citation style include:
146
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
1. Footnotes or endnotes: Footnotes or endnotes are used to provide specific
information about a source, including the author, title, publication date, and
page number.
2. Bibliography page: A bibliography page lists all of the sources used in a
paper, including books, journal articles, websites, and other sources.
3. In-text citations: In-text citations are used to indicate the source of a quote
or paraphrase within the body of a paper.
4. Book references: Book references include the author, title, place of
publication, publisher, and date of publication.
5. Journal article references: Journal article references include the author,
article title, journal title, volume and issue number, date of publication, and
page numbers.
It's important to follow the guidelines of the Turabian citation style correctly
in order to ensure that your paper is properly formatted and that your sources
are correctly cited.
Oxford citation style
Primarily used in the fields of law, philosophy, and some humanities
disciplines.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
147
Referencing and Citations
The Oxford citation style, also known as the documentary-note style or
Oxford referencing style, is a citation style used in academic writing and
research. It is commonly used in the humanities, particularly in the field of
history, and is also used in the social sciences and some natural sciences.
In the Oxford citation style, in-text citations consist of a number in superscript
placed after the relevant information. This number corresponds to a full
citation in a bibliography or reference list at the end of the document. The full
citation includes the author's name, publication date, title, and publication
information.
For example, an in-text citation in the Oxford style might look like this:
Smith argues that "Oxford referencing is a flexible and widely used style"
(2010, 35).
And the corresponding entry in the bibliography might look like this:
Smith, John. 2010. Oxford Referencing: A Guide for Students. Oxford
University Press.
It is important to note that the Oxford citation style has several variations and
specific guidelines, so it is important to consult the appropriate style guide or
check with your instructor or academic department to ensure that you are
using the correct version and format.
148
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
In general, a citation typically includes the author's name, the publication date,
and the title of the source being cited, as well as any other relevant information
such as page numbers or URLs. The format of the citation will depend on the
specific citation style being used.
It is important to be consistent in your use of referencing and citation styles,
and to accurately and completely cite all sources used in your writing. Failing
to properly cite sources can be considered plagiarism, which is a serious academic offense.
Vancouver style
In medical research and writing, the most commonly used citation style is the
Vancouver style. The Vancouver style is a numerical system of referencing,
which means that in-text citations consist of a number in square brackets that
corresponds to a full reference in the reference list at the end of the document.
The Vancouver style is widely used in medical writing and is recommended by
many medical journals, including the British Medical Journal (BMJ), The
Lancet, and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). It is
also often used in medical dissertations, theses, and other academic writing in
the medical field.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
149
Referencing and Citations
Here is an example of an in-text citation in the Vancouver style:
"The use of anti-inflammatory drugs has been shown to reduce the risk of
heart disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [1]."
And the corresponding reference in the reference list:
[1] Smith J, Johnson D, Lee S. Anti-inflammatory drugs and heart disease in patients with
rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(17):1734-1741.
It is important to note that different universities and institutions may have
specific requirements for referencing and citation styles in medical theses, so it
is important to consult the appropriate style guide or check with your
supervisor to ensure that you are using the correct format and style.
Referencing and citations are important components of academic writing and
research. They serve several key functions:
1. Establishing credibility: Referencing and citations demonstrate that the
writer has conducted thorough research, has a solid understanding of the
relevant literature, and is aware of the contributions of other researchers. This
helps to establish the writer's credibility and authority in the field.
2. Avoiding plagiarism: Referencing and citations acknowledge the sources
used in the research and writing process, allowing readers to distinguish the
150
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
writer's original ideas from those of others. This helps to avoid plagiarism,
which is a serious academic offence.
3. Providing context and support: Referencing and citations help to provide
context and support for the writer's arguments and claims. By including
information about other research and perspectives, the writer can position
their work within the broader academic discourse and provide additional
support for their conclusions.
4. Facilitating further research: Referencing and citations enable readers to
access the sources used in the research and writing process. This makes it
easier for others to find and review the original materials, which can facilitate
further research and inquiry.
In a thesis, referencing and citations are particularly important. A thesis
represents a major research project, and it is expected to make a significant
contribution to the field. Proper referencing and citations demonstrate the
writer's mastery of the relevant literature and their ability to engage critically
and meaningfully with that literature. This is essential to the credibility and
success of the thesis.
Software tools used in referencing:
There are several software tools that are commonly used as referencing tools
in academic writing and research. Some of the most popular include:
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
151
Referencing and Citations
1. EndNote: EndNote is a reference management software that helps users to
organize and format references and citations. It can be used to create and
manage a personal library of references, and it can also be used to insert in-text
citations and generate a bibliography in various citation styles, including the
Vancouver style and the Oxford style.
2. Mendeley: Mendeley is a free reference management software that allows
users to store and organize their references, annotate PDFs, and collaborate
with others on research projects. It can also be used to generate in-text
citations and bibliographies in a range of citation styles.
3. Zotero: Zotero is a free, open-source reference management software that
can be used to store and organize references, create bibliographies, and insert
in-text citations. It is compatible with a variety of citation styles, including the
Vancouver style and the Oxford style.
4. Microsoft Word: Microsoft Word includes a built-in referencing tool,
known as the "References" feature, that can be used to insert and format intext citations and generate a bibliography in a variety of citation styles,
including the Vancouver style and the Oxford style.
Each of these tools has its own strengths and weaknesses, and the best one for
a particular individual or project will depend on their specific needs and
preferences. It is important to consider factors such as compatibility with your
preferred citation style, ease of use, and cost when choosing a referencing tool.
152
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
153
Referencing and Citations
154
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
CHAPTER 10
Choice of statistical test
in data analysis
The choice of statistical test in data analysis in thesis work depends on several
factors, including the research question, the type of data, the distribution of
the data, the number of groups being compared, and the type of comparisons
being made. Some of the most commonly used statistical tests in thesis work
include:
1. Independent t-test: Used to compare the means of two independent groups.
2. Paired t-test: Used to compare the means of two related or dependent
groups.
3. One-way ANOVA: Used to compare the means of three or more
independent groups.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
155
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
4. Factorial ANOVA: Used to test the effects of two or more independent
variables on a dependent variable.
5. Repeated Measures ANOVA: Used to compare the means of two or more
related groups.
6. chi-square test: Used to test for associations between categorical variables.
7. Linear regression: Used to model the relationship between a dependent
variable and one or more independent variables.
8. Logistic regression: Used to model the relationship between a binary
dependent variable and one or more independent variables.
It's important to keep in mind that statistical tests are just tools, and the choice
of a specific test should always be guided by the research question and the
underlying assumptions of the test. It's also a good idea to consult with a
statistician to ensure that the appropriate test is being used and that the results
are being interpreted correctly.
Independent T test:
The independent t-test, also known as a two-sample t-test, is a statistical
hypothesis test used to compare the means of two independent groups. The
test is used to determine whether there is a significant difference between the
156
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
means of two groups, and to evaluate the strength of the evidence for this
difference.
The independent t-test is appropriate when the following assumptions are met:
1. Independence: The observations in each group are independent and not
related to each other.
2. Normality: The population from which the samples are drawn is
approximately normally distributed.
3. Equal variances: The variances of the two populations are equal.
The independent t-test is commonly used in various fields, such as psychology,
sociology, education, and medicine, to compare the means of two groups on a
continuous outcome variable. For example, it might be used to compare the
effectiveness of two different teaching methods on test scores, or to compare
the mean height of two different plant species.
It's important to note that while the independent t-test is a widely used
statistical tool, it may not be appropriate in all circumstances. For example, if
the sample size is small or the variance between the two groups is unequal, it
may be more appropriate to use a different test, such as the Welch's t-test or
the Mann-Whitney U test.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
157
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
Example:
Let's say we have data on the test scores of 50 randomly selected students
from two different classes, Class A and Class B. We want to determine if there
is a significant difference in the average test scores between the two classes.
Here's the data:
Class A:
83, 85, 88, 90, 92, 93, 95, 96, 98, 98,
99, 99, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100,
100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100,
100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100
Class B:
75, 80, 82, 84, 85, 87, 88, 89, 91, 92,
93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 99, 99, 99,
99, 99, 99, 99, 99, 99, 99, 99, 99, 99,
99, 99, 99, 99, 99, 99, 99, 99, 99, 99
We'll use the independent t-test to compare the means of the two classes. The
steps to perform an independent t-test are as follows:
158
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
1. State the null and alternative hypotheses.
The null hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in the average test
scores between the two classes. The alternative hypothesis is that there is a
significant difference in the average test scores between the two classes.
2. Calculate the mean, standard deviation, and sample size of each class.
Class A:
Mean = 98
Standard deviation = 2.6
Sample size = 50
Class B:
Mean = 95
Standard deviation = 3.6
Sample size = 50
3. Calculate the t-statistic.
The formula for the t-statistic is:
t = (mean1 - mean2) / (sqrt((s1^2/n1) + (s2^2/n2)))
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
159
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
where mean1 and mean2 are the means of the two classes, s1 and s2 are the
standard deviations of the two classes, and n1 and n2 are the sample sizes of
the two classes.
Plugging in the values, we get:
t = (98 - 95) / (sqrt((2.6^2/50) + (3.6^2/50))) = 2.51
4. Determine the degrees of freedom (df).
The degrees of freedom (df) is equal to the sum of the sample sizes minus 2:
df = n1 + n2 - 2 = 50 + 50 - 2 = 98
5. Look up the t-critical value using a t-distribution table with 98 degrees of
freedom and a significance level of 0.05 (or whichever significance level you
prefer). The t-critical value with 98 degrees of freedom and a significance level
of 0.05 is 1.98.
6. Make a decision.
If the t-statistic is greater than the t-critical value, we reject the null hypothesis
and conclude that there is a significant difference in the average test scores
between the two classes. If the t-statistic is less than the t-critical value, we fail
to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to
support the conclusion that there is a significant difference in the average test
scores between the two classes.
160
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Since the t-statistic (2.51) is greater than the t-critical value (1.98), we reject the
null hypothesis.
Scenarios in which independent t-test is used:
The independent t-test can be used in a number of scenarios where the goal is
to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two
independent groups. Here are some common examples:
1. Comparing the means of two different groups of continuous data. For
example, you might use an independent t-test to determine if there is a
significant difference in the average height of men and women, or in the
average weight of two different populations.
2. Comparing the means of two groups of dichotomous data. For example,
you might use an independent t-test to determine if there is a significant
difference in the proportion of individuals who voted for candidate A versus
candidate B in an election.
3. Comparing the means of two groups of ordinal data. For example, you
might use an independent t-test to determine if there is a significant difference
in the average rating given by customers to two different products.
4. Comparing the means of two groups of counts. For example, you might use
an independent t-test to determine if there is a significant difference in the
average number of books read per month by two different age groups.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
161
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
5. Comparing the means of pre- and post-treatment data. For example, you
might use an independent t-test to determine if there is a significant difference
in the average weight of individuals before and after a weight loss program.
In general, the independent t-test is used when the two groups are
independent of each other, and the data is approximately normally distributed.
This test can be performed using widely available software statistical tools like:
Excel
SPSS
R software etc.,
The independent t-test is not appropriate in the following situations:
1. Non-normal data. The independent t-test assumes that the data is
approximately normally distributed. If the data is not normally distributed, the
t-test may not be an appropriate method of analysis. In these cases, other tests,
such as the Mann-Whitney U test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, may be more
appropriate.
2. Dependent groups. The independent t-test is designed to compare the
means of two independent groups. If the groups are not independent, for
example if the same individuals are measured at two different time points, the
paired t-test should be used instead.
162
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
3. Small sample size. The independent t-test assumes that the sample size is
large enough for the Central Limit Theorem to hold. For small sample sizes
(less than 30), the t-test may not be accurate and other tests, such as the
Wilcoxon rank-sum test, may be more appropriate.
4. Extremely skewed data. The independent t-test assumes that the data is
approximately symmetrical. If the data is extremely skewed, the t-test may not
be an appropriate method of analysis and other tests, such as the Wilcoxon
rank-sum test or the Mann-Whitney U test, may be more appropriate.
5. Different variances. The independent t-test assumes that the two groups
have equal variances. If the variances are significantly different, the t-test may
not be an appropriate method of analysis and other tests, such as the Welch ttest, may be more appropriate.
It's important to keep in mind that these are general guidelines, and the
appropriateness of the independent t-test depends on the specific
circumstances of each case. In order to choose the best test for your data, it's
always a good idea to consult with a statistician or perform exploratory data
analysis to check the assumptions of the test.
Paired T test:
The paired t-test, also known as the dependent t-test, is a statistical test used to
determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two related
or dependent groups. Unlike the independent t-test, which is used to compare
the means of two independent groups, the paired t-test is used to compare the
means of two groups where the observations are not independent.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
163
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
For example, you might use a paired t-test to compare the scores on a pre-test
and post-test for a group of individuals. In this case, the same individuals are
being tested at two different time points, making the groups dependent. The
paired t-test can also be used to compare the difference between two
treatments for the same individuals, such as before and after a medical
treatment.
The paired t-test works by calculating the difference between the pairs of
observations and then testing the mean of the differences to determine if it is
significantly different from zero. If the mean of the differences is significantly
different from zero, this indicates that there is a significant difference between
the means of the two groups.
The paired t-test is similar to the independent t-test, but it makes use of the
relationship between the pairs of observations to increase the accuracy of the
results. The paired t-test assumes that the differences between the pairs are
normally distributed, so it's important to check this assumption before using
the test.
Here is a simple example of a scenario where a paired t-test could be used:
Suppose you are a researcher interested in evaluating the efficacy of a new
study technique for improving exam scores. You recruit a sample of 20
students and randomly assign them to one of two groups: a control group and
an experimental group. The control group continues to study using their usual
methods, while the experimental group uses the new study technique.
After a set period of time, you administer an exam to both groups and record
the scores. You can then use a paired t-test to determine if there is a significant
164
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
difference between the mean exam scores of the control group and the
experimental group.
In this case, the paired t-test is appropriate because the same individuals are
being tested before and after the intervention (the new study technique),
making the groups dependent. The paired t-test allows you to account for the
relationship between the pairs of exam scores and to determine if the mean
exam score of the experimental group is significantly different from the mean
exam score of the control group.
This is just one example of how a paired t-test can be used in research. Other
examples might include comparing the difference in weight between before
and after a diet program, or comparing the difference in blood pressure
between before and after a medication is taken.
Here is an example of how a paired t-test can be performed using sample data.
Suppose we have a sample of 20 individuals and we are interested in
determining if there is a significant difference in their weight before and after a
diet program. The sample data might look like this:
Subject Weight_Before Weight_After
1
150
145
2
160
155
3
170
165
4
145
140
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
165
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
5
155
150
20
165
160
The first step in performing a paired t-test is to calculate the difference
between each individual's weight before and after the diet program. We can
add a new column to the data to store these differences:
Subject Weight_Before Weight_After Difference
1
150
145
-5
2
160
155
-5
3
170
165
-5
4
145
140
-5
5
155
150
-5
20
165
160
-5
Next, we can calculate the mean and standard deviation of the differences:
Mean of Differences = -5
Standard Deviation of Differences = 1.5
166
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Finally, we can use these values to perform the paired t-test. The null
hypothesis for the paired t-test is that there is no significant difference
between the means of the two groups (in this case, the mean weight before and
after the diet program). The alternative hypothesis is that there is a significant
difference between the means of the two groups.
The test statistic for the paired t-test is calculated as follows:
t = Mean of Differences / (Standard Deviation of Differences / Square Root
of Sample Size)
Plugging in the values from the sample data:
t = -5 / (1.5 / sqrt(20)) = -5.22
To determine if the result is significant, we compare the calculated t-value to a
critical value from a t-distribution table with degrees of freedom equal to the
sample size minus 1 (19 in this case). If the calculated t-value is greater than
the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a
significant difference between the means of the two groups. If the calculated tvalue is less than the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and
conclude that there is not enough evidence to support the claim that there is a
significant difference between the means of the two groups.
This is just a simple example of how a paired t-test can be performed using
sample data. In practice, you would need to use a statistical software package
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
167
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
or perform the calculations by hand using a t-distribution table to get accurate
results.
Here are a few examples of scenarios where a paired t-test could be used:
1. Evaluating the effectiveness of a new medication: Researchers might use a
paired t-test to compare the blood pressure readings of a sample of individuals
before and after taking a new medication.
2. Comparing the effectiveness of two different teaching methods: A teacher
might use a paired t-test to compare the test scores of a class of students
before and after being taught using two different teaching methods.
3. Examining the impact of a new exercise program: A fitness trainer might use
a paired t-test to compare the body fat percentage of a sample of individuals
before and after participating in a new exercise program.
4. Measuring the impact of a stress management program: A psychologist
might use a paired t-test to compare the anxiety levels of a sample of
individuals before and after participating in a stress management program.
5. Evaluating the impact of a diet program: A dietitian might use a paired t-test
to compare the weight of a sample of individuals before and after participating
in a diet program.
These are just a few examples of the many scenarios in which a paired t-test
might be used. The key feature of these scenarios is that the same individuals
are being tested twice, either before and after an intervention or using two
168
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
different methods, making the groups dependent. The paired t-test allows you
to account for this dependence and to determine if there is a significant
difference between the means of the two groups.
One way ANOVA:
One-Way Analysis of Variance (One-Way ANOVA) is a statistical test used to
determine if there is a significant difference in the means of two or more
independent groups. It is a commonly used method for testing the equality of
means across multiple groups, and it is especially useful when you want to
compare the means of more than two groups.
In a One-Way ANOVA, the null hypothesis is that the means of all the groups
are equal, while the alternative hypothesis is that at least one of the group
means is different. The test statistic used in the One-Way ANOVA is the Fratio, which is calculated as the ratio of the variance between the groups to the
variance within the groups.
The One-Way ANOVA is a robust method for comparing means and can
handle unbalanced designs, missing data, and unequal variances between
groups. However, if the assumptions of normality and equal variances are
violated, the One-Way ANOVA may not provide accurate results. In such
cases, a non-parametric test or a transformed data set might be necessary.
One-Way ANOVA is commonly used in a wide range of fields, including
psychology, sociology, education, biology, and medicine, among others. It can
be used to compare the means of groups in a wide range of situations, such as
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
169
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
evaluating the impact of a new drug, comparing the effectiveness of different
teaching methods, or examining the impact of a new exercise program.
Scenarios in which one-way Anova test can be used:
One-Way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) is a statistical test used to determine
if there is a significant difference between the means of two or more
independent groups. Here are some scenarios in which One-Way ANOVA
can be used:
1. Agricultural research: One-Way ANOVA can be used to compare the yields
of different varieties of crops grown under similar conditions.
2. Medical research: One-Way ANOVA can be used to compare the
effectiveness of different treatments for a particular medical condition.
3. Marketing research: One-Way ANOVA can be used to compare the
effectiveness of different advertising campaigns targeted towards different
demographic groups.
4. Education research: One-Way ANOVA can be used to compare the test
scores of students in different schools, or in different classes within the same
school.
5. Psychological research: One-Way ANOVA can be used to compare the
responses of participants in different age groups or from different cultural
backgrounds.
170
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
6. Industrial research: One-Way ANOVA can be used to compare the
efficiency of different production processes in a manufacturing plant.
These are just a few examples of the many scenarios in which One-Way
ANOVA can be used. It's important to note that ANOVA is only appropriate
when the data being analyzed meets certain assumptions, such as normality
and homoscedasticity.
Here's a sample scenario in which a One-Way ANOVA test can be executed:
Suppose a marketing research company wants to determine if there is a
difference in the average monthly income of customers who prefer different
types of coffee. They gather data on 100 customers, with 25 customers each
preferring Espresso, Latte, Americano, and Cappuccino. The following table
summarizes the data:
Espresso
Average Income $3000
Latte
$3200
Americano
$3500
Cappuccino
$3400
The One-Way ANOVA test can be executed to determine if there is a
significant difference in the average monthly income of customers who prefer
different types of coffee.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
171
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
Assuming the data meets the assumptions of the One-Way ANOVA test, the
results might look something like this:
Source of Variation SS
Between Groups
df MS
F p-value
40000 3 13333 3.85 0.02
Within Groups
16000 96 167
Total
56000 99
The p-value of 0.02 indicates that there is a significant difference in the average
monthly income of customers who prefer different types of coffee. This
means that the marketing research company can conclude that customers who
prefer different types of coffee have different average monthly incomes.
However, further analysis, such as post-hoc tests, would be necessary to
determine which specific groups have different average incomes.
One-Way ANOVA is a widely used statistical test, but it is important to be
aware of its limitations and pitfalls to avoid making incorrect conclusions.
Here are some of the potential pitfalls of One-Way ANOVA:
1. Assumptions: One-Way ANOVA makes several assumptions about the
data, including normality and homoscedasticity. If these assumptions are not
met, the results of the test can be unreliable or incorrect. It's important to
check the assumptions of the test before conducting the analysis.
2. Independence: One-Way ANOVA assumes that the observations in each
group are independent of each other. If this assumption is violated, for
172
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
example if the observations are correlated within groups, the results of the test
can be unreliable or incorrect.
3. Equal group sizes: One-Way ANOVA assumes that the sample sizes in each
group are equal. If the sample sizes are not equal, it can result in biased or
incorrect results.
4. Multiple comparisons: One-Way ANOVA only tests for a difference
between the means of the groups as a whole. It does not test for differences
between each specific pair of groups. To test for specific differences, a posthoc test such as a Tukey test must be used.
5. Type I error: One-Way ANOVA has a risk of making a Type I error, which
is rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. The risk of making a
Type I error can be controlled by using a stringent alpha level (e.g., 0.01
instead of 0.05) or by using a more stringent statistical test such as a nonparametric test.
6. Type II error: One-Way ANOVA also has a risk of making a Type II error,
which is failing to reject the null hypothesis when it is actually false. The risk of
making a Type II error can be reduced by increasing the sample size.
These are some of the potential pitfalls of One-Way ANOVA. It's important
to be aware of these limitations and to interpret the results of the test carefully
to ensure accurate and reliable conclusions.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
173
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
Factorial ANOVA:
Factorial ANOVA is a type of ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) that allows for
the analysis of multiple independent variables (also known as factors) on a
dependent variable. Unlike One-Way ANOVA, which only tests for the
differences in means between two or more groups, Factorial ANOVA tests for
the effect of multiple factors on the dependent variable.
For example, a Factorial ANOVA might be used to study the effect of two
different factors (such as diet and exercise) on weight loss. In this scenario, the
dependent variable would be weight loss, and the two independent variables
would be diet and exercise.
Factorial ANOVA can be either between-subjects (when the independent
variables are manipulated between different participants) or within-subjects
(when the independent variables are manipulated within the same
participants).
Factorial ANOVA can also be two-way (when there are two independent
variables) or multi-way (when there are more than two independent variables).
The results of a Factorial ANOVA can be used to determine if there is a
significant main effect for each factor, as well as if there is an interaction
between factors. The main effect indicates the overall effect of a factor on the
dependent variable, while the interaction indicates that the effect of one factor
depends on the level of another factor.
Factorial ANOVA can be a useful tool for researchers who want to study the
effect of multiple factors on a dependent variable, and is widely used in fields
such as psychology, education, biology, and marketing. However, like all
174
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
statistical tests, it is important to be aware of its limitations and to interpret the
results carefully to ensure accurate and reliable conclusions.
Here's a sample scenario in which a Factorial ANOVA can be applied:
Suppose a research group is interested in examining the effect of two factors
(diet and exercise) on weight loss. They recruit 60 participants and randomly
assign them to one of four groups:
1. Control group (no diet or exercise)
2. Diet group (diet intervention only)
3. Exercise group (exercise intervention only)
4. Diet and exercise group (both diet and exercise interventions)
After 8 weeks, the participants' weight loss is measured. The following table
summarizes the data:
Control
Average weight loss (kg) 2.0
Diet
Exercise
Diet & Exercise
4.0
3.5
5.0
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
175
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
A Factorial ANOVA can be applied to determine if there is a significant main
effect of diet and exercise, as well as if there is an interaction between the two
factors.
Assuming the data meets the assumptions of the Factorial ANOVA, the
results might look something like this:
Source of Variation
SS
df
MS
F
p-value
Diet
36.0 1 36.0 7.20 0.01
Exercise
9.0 1 9.0 1.80 0.19
Diet x Exercise
16.0 1 16.0 3.20 0.08
Error
36.0 56 0.64
Total
97.0 59
The p-value of 0.01 for the Diet factor indicates that there is a significant main
effect of diet on weight loss. The p-value of 0.19 for the Exercise factor
indicates that there is not a significant main effect of exercise on weight loss.
The p-value of 0.08 for the interaction between Diet and Exercise indicates
that there is a marginal interaction between the two factors on weight loss.
These results suggest that the diet intervention has a significant effect on
weight loss, but the exercise intervention does not. However, the interaction
between diet and exercise suggests that the effect of the diet intervention
might depend on whether or not the participant is also participating in the
176
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
exercise intervention. Further analysis, such as post-hoc tests, would be
necessary to explore the interaction further.
Like any statistical test, Factorial ANOVA has certain limitations and potential
problems that need to be considered when interpreting the results:
1. Assumptions: Factorial ANOVA assumes that the dependent variable is
normally distributed and that the variances of the groups being compared are
equal. If these assumptions are not met, the results of the Factorial ANOVA
can be inaccurate.
2. Interactions: Interactions between factors can be difficult to interpret, and
further analysis may be necessary to fully understand their implications.
3. Multiple comparisons: Factorial ANOVA makes multiple comparisons
between groups, which can increase the likelihood of finding false positive
results (i.e., Type I errors). To address this issue, multiple comparison methods
such as Tukey HSD or Bonferroni correction can be used.
4. Limited power: Factorial ANOVA can have limited power to detect
interactions or main effects, especially if the sample size is small or if the effect
sizes are small.
5. Complexity: Factorial ANOVA can become complex when there are more
than two independent variables, making it more difficult to interpret the
results.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
177
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
6. Misinterpretation of results: As with any statistical test, the results of
Factorial ANOVA need to be interpreted carefully and with a thorough
understanding of the underlying assumptions and limitations.
Misinterpretation of results can lead to incorrect conclusions.
These potential problems highlight the importance of careful planning and
analysis when conducting Factorial ANOVA. It is also important to consider
alternative statistical tests, such as regression analysis, when appropriate.
Repeated Measures ANOVA
Repeated Measures ANOVA is a statistical test used to determine the effect of
a within-subjects independent variable (i.e., a variable that is measured
repeatedly over time or under different conditions) on a continuous dependent
variable. This test is used when the same participants are used to evaluate
multiple levels of the independent variable.
Here's a sample scenario in which a Repeated Measures ANOVA could be
applied:
Suppose a research group is interested in examining the effect of a new sleepaid medication on sleep quality. They recruit 30 participants and ask them to
rate their sleep quality over the course of a week. They are asked to rate their
sleep quality on a scale of 1 to 10 for 7 consecutive nights, both before and
after taking the medication.
178
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
The following table summarizes the data:
Participant Night 1 Night 2 Night 3 Night 4 Night 5 Night 6 Night 7
1
6
8
7
8
9
9
8
2
7
5
4
6
7
8
9
8
9
7
8
8
9
9
...
30
A Repeated Measures ANOVA can be applied to determine if there is a
significant effect of the sleep-aid medication on sleep quality.
Assuming the data meets the assumptions of the Repeated Measures ANOVA,
the results might look something like this:
Source of Variation
SS
Medication
9.0
df
MS
F
p-value
1 9.0 5.67 0.03
Error
54.0 28
Total
63.0 29
1.93
The p-value of 0.03 for the Medication factor indicates that there is a
significant effect of the sleep-aid medication on sleep quality. This suggests
that taking the medication leads to an improvement in sleep quality.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
179
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
It is important to note that the assumptions of the Repeated Measures
ANOVA include sphericity (the assumption that the variance of the
differences between levels of the independent variable is equal), which must be
tested and confirmed before conducting the analysis. If sphericity is not met,
correction methods such as the Greenhouse-Geisser or Huynh-Feldt
correction can be used. Additionally, post-hoc tests, such as paired t-tests, may
be necessary to determine which specific levels of the independent variable are
different.
Like any statistical test, Repeated Measures ANOVA has certain limitations
and potential problems that need to be considered when interpreting the
results:
1. Assumptions: Repeated Measures ANOVA assumes that the dependent
variable is normally distributed, the variances of the groups being compared
are equal, and sphericity (the assumption that the variance of the differences
between levels of the independent variable is equal) is met. If these
assumptions are not met, the results of the Repeated Measures ANOVA can
be inaccurate.
2. Sphericity: Sphericity is a critical assumption of Repeated Measures
ANOVA and must be tested and confirmed before conducting the analysis. If
sphericity is not met, correction methods can be used, but this can impact the
interpretability of the results.
3. Dependence between measures: When the same participants are used to
evaluate multiple levels of the independent variable, dependence between
measures can occur. This dependence can lead to inflated Type I error rates, so
it is important to carefully consider the nature of the dependence when
interpreting the results of the Repeated Measures ANOVA.
180
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
4. Power: The power of the Repeated Measures ANOVA can be limited,
especially if the sample size is small or if the effect sizes are small. This can
impact the ability of the test to detect significant effects, so it is important to
carefully consider the sample size when planning the study.
5. Choice of contrasts: The choice of contrasts used to compare the levels of
the independent variable can have a major impact on the results of the
Repeated Measures ANOVA. It is important to carefully consider the
contrasts used and to ensure that they are appropriate for the research
question being addressed.
6. Misinterpretation of results: As with any statistical test, the results of
Repeated Measures ANOVA need to be interpreted carefully and with a
thorough understanding of the underlying assumptions and limitations.
Misinterpretation of results can lead to incorrect conclusions.
These potential problems highlight the importance of careful planning and
analysis when conducting a Repeated Measures ANOVA. It is also important
to consider alternative statistical tests, such as mixed-effects models, when
appropriate.
Chi-square test:
The chi-square test is a statistical test that is used to determine whether there is
a significant association between two categorical variables. It involves
comparing observed data with expected data under a null hypothesis of
independence and calculates a test statistic that follows a chi-square
distribution. The resulting p-value can be used to determine whether to reject
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
181
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
or fail to reject the null hypothesis. The chi-square test is commonly used in
fields such as biology, social science, and market research.
The chi-square test can be used in various scenarios, including:
1. Testing the independence of two categorical variables, such as gender and
political party affiliation.
2. Comparing observed frequencies with expected frequencies, such as in
genetics studies involving the inheritance of traits.
3. Analysing the goodness of fit of a set of observed data to an expected
distribution, such as testing whether data follow a normal distribution.
4. Evaluating the homogeneity of a sample, such as testing whether the
proportions of different ethnic groups in a sample match those in the general
population.
5. Testing the association between two variables in a contingency table, such as
testing whether smoking is associated with lung cancer.
The chi-square test is a flexible statistical tool that can be adapted to various
research questions involving categorical data.
Example:
182
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Here's an example of sample data and an application of the chi-square test:
Suppose a market research firm wants to test whether there is a significant
association between gender and preferred brand of soda. The firm conducts a
survey of 200 people, consisting of 100 men and 100 women, and asks them to
choose between three soda brands: A, B, and C. The results are as follows:
Brand A
Brand B
Brand C
Men
40
30
30
Women
30
40
30
To test whether there is a significant association between gender and preferred
brand of soda, the firm can use a chi-square test of independence. The null
hypothesis is that gender and brand preference are independent, and the
alternative hypothesis is that they are not independent.
Using a statistical software or calculator, the firm computes a chi-square test
statistic of 6.0 and a p-value of 0.049, assuming a significance level of 0.05.
Since the p-value is less than the significance level, the firm rejects the null
hypothesis and concludes that there is a significant association between gender
and preferred brand of soda.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
183
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
This example demonstrates how the chi-square test can be used to analyze the
relationship between two categorical variables and determine whether the
observed data provide evidence against the null hypothesis.
Types of chi-square tests:
There are three main types of chi-square tests:
1. Chi-square test of independence: This test is used to determine whether
there is a significant association between two categorical variables. It involves
comparing observed data with expected data under the assumption of
independence between the variables.
2. Chi-square test of goodness of fit: This test is used to determine whether a
sample of data follows a hypothesized distribution. It involves comparing
observed data with expected data under a null hypothesis of the hypothesized
distribution.
3. Chi-square test of homogeneity: This test is used to determine whether two
or more samples come from the same population. It involves comparing
observed data from different samples with expected data under the
assumption of a common distribution for all samples.
All three types of chi-square tests involve computing a test statistic that
follows a chi-square distribution and using the resulting p-value to determine
whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. The specific formula for
each type of test differs, but they all involve comparing observed and expected
frequencies and calculating the standardized discrepancy between them. Chi-
184
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
square tests are commonly used in fields such as biology, psychology, market
research, and social science.
Formula for performing Chi-square test:
The formula for calculating the chi-square test statistic depends on the specific
type of chi-square test being performed. Here are the three most common
types:
1. Chi-square test of independence: This test is used to determine whether two
categorical variables are independent or associated. The formula for the test
statistic is:
χ² = ∑ (O - E)² / E
where:
O = observed frequency in each cell of a contingency table
E = expected frequency in each cell of a contingency table (under the
assumption of independence)
2. Chi-square test of goodness of fit: This test is used to determine whether a
sample of data fits a hypothesized distribution. The formula for the test
statistic is:
χ² = ∑ (O - E)² / E
where:
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
185
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
O = observed frequency in each category of the sample data
E = expected frequency in each category based on the hypothesized
distribution
3. Chi-square test of homogeneity: This test is used to determine whether two
or more samples are homogeneous or come from different populations. The
formula for the test statistic is:
χ² = ∑ ∑ (O - E)² / E
where:
O = observed frequency in each cell of a contingency table
E = expected frequency in each cell based on a common distribution for all
samples
In each formula, the chi-square test statistic measures the discrepancy between
observed and expected frequencies, standardized by the expected frequencies.
The test statistic follows a chi-square distribution with degrees of freedom
determined by the specific test and the size of the contingency table or the
number of categories. The p-value of the test can be calculated from the chisquare distribution, or obtained from a statistical software or calculator.
Here are some scenarios where the different types of chi-square tests can be
used:
1. Chi-square test of independence: This test is used when two categorical
variables are being compared to determine whether there is a significant
186
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
association between them. For example, a survey may be conducted to
investigate whether there is a significant relationship between gender and
political party affiliation.
2. Chi-square test of goodness of fit: This test is used to determine whether a
sample of data follows a hypothesized distribution. For example, a researcher
may want to determine if the proportions of different blood types in a
population follow a particular distribution.
3. Chi-square test of homogeneity: This test is used to compare the
proportions of different categories across two or more groups. For example, a
medical researcher may want to compare the proportions of people with
different types of cancer among different age groups.
In each of these scenarios, the chi-square test involves comparing observed
data with expected data under a null hypothesis. The resulting test statistic and
p-value can be used to determine whether to reject or fail to reject the null
hypothesis, and thus whether there is evidence for a relationship or difference
between the variables being studied.
Linear Regression:
Linear regression is a statistical method for modelling the relationship between
a dependent variable and one or more independent variables. The goal of
linear regression is to find the line (or hyperplane, in higher dimensions) that
best fits the data, so that we can use this line to predict the value of the
dependent variable for a given set of independent variables.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
187
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
In simple linear regression, there is only one independent variable and the
relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable is
assumed to be linear. The equation for a simple linear regression model is:
y = β₀ + β₁x + ε
where:
y is the dependent variable
x is the independent variable
β₀ is the intercept (the value of y when x = 0)
β₁ is the slope (the change in y for a one-unit increase in x)
ε is the error term (random variation not accounted for by the model)
In multiple linear regression, there are multiple independent variables and the
relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variables is
still assumed to be linear. The equation for a multiple linear regression model
is:
y = β₀ + β₁x₁ + β₂x₂ + ... + βᵣxᵣ + ε
where:
y is the dependent variable
188
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
x₁, x₂, ..., xᵣ are the independent variables
β₀ is the intercept (the value of y when all independent variables are 0)
β₁, β₂, ..., βᵣ are the slopes (the change in y for a one-unit increase in each
independent variable, holding all other variables constant)
ε is the error term (random variation not accounted for by the model)
Linear regression is a widely used statistical tool in many fields, such as
economics, finance, biology, engineering, and social science. It is often used
for prediction, explanation, and hypothesis testing.
Linear regression can be used in a variety of scenarios, including:
1. Predictive modelling: Linear regression can be used to predict the value of a
dependent variable for a given set of independent variables. For example, a
bank may use linear regression to predict the creditworthiness of a loan
applicant based on their income, debt, and other financial factors.
2. Explanation and inference: Linear regression can be used to determine the
relationship between two or more variables and to test hypotheses about that
relationship. For example, a researcher may use linear regression to determine
the effect of a new medication on blood pressure, while controlling for other
factors such as age and weight.
3. Forecasting: Linear regression can be used to forecast future values of a
dependent variable based on historical trends. For example, a business may use
linear regression to forecast future sales based on past sales data and other
economic indicators.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
189
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
4. Quality control: Linear regression can be used in quality control to
determine the relationship between process variables and product quality. For
example, a manufacturer may use linear regression to determine the effect of
temperature and pressure on the strength of a product.
5. Trend analysis: Linear regression can be used to analyze trends in data over
time. For example, a social scientist may use linear regression to analyze the
trend in crime rates over time, while controlling for other factors such as
population growth and demographic changes.
These are just a few examples of the many scenarios where linear regression
can be used. Linear regression is a versatile and widely used statistical method
that can be applied in many different fields and for many different purposes.
Logistic regression:
Logistic regression is a statistical method for analysing the relationship
between a binary dependent variable (i.e., a variable that takes on only two
possible values, typically 0 and 1) and one or more independent variables. The
goal of logistic regression is to estimate the probability that the dependent
variable is 1, given the values of the independent variables.
The logistic regression model is based on the logistic function, which maps any
real-valued input to a value between 0 and 1. The logistic function is defined
as:
190
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
p = 1 / (1 + e^(-z))
where:
p is the probability of the dependent variable being 1
z is a linear combination of the independent variables
The logistic regression model is typically estimated using maximum likelihood
estimation, which involves finding the values of the regression coefficients that
maximize the likelihood of the observed data, given the model. The resulting
model can then be used to predict the probability of the dependent variable
being 1 for new observations.
Logistic regression is a widely used statistical method in many fields, such as
medicine, epidemiology, psychology, marketing, and economics. It can be used
to model a variety of binary outcomes, such as the presence or absence of a
disease, the likelihood of purchasing a product, or the probability of defaulting
on a loan. It is often used for prediction, explanation, and hypothesis testing.
Logistic regression is a widely used statistical method and can be applied in
many different fields and for many different purposes. Some common
scenarios where logistic regression can be used include:
1. Medical research: Logistic regression can be used to model the probability
of a disease or condition based on patient characteristics, such as age, sex, and
medical history.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
191
Choice of statistical test in data analysis
2. Marketing: Logistic regression can be used to model the probability of a
customer making a purchase based on demographic and behavioural
characteristics, such as age, income, and past purchase history.
3. Credit risk analysis: Logistic regression can be used to model the probability
of defaulting on a loan based on financial and demographic characteristics,
such as income, credit score, and employment history.
4. Political science: Logistic regression can be used to model the probability of
a voter supporting a particular candidate or political party based on
demographic and political characteristics, such as age, education, and party
affiliation.
5. Natural language processing: Logistic regression can be used to model the
probability of a sentence or document belonging to a particular category based
on the words and phrases it contains.
These are just a few examples of the many scenarios where logistic regression
can be used. Logistic regression is a versatile and widely used statistical method
that can be applied to a wide range of binary classification problems, where the
goal is to predict the probability of a binary outcome based on one or more
predictor variables.
192
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
CHAPTER 11
Revising and Editing the
Thesis
Revising and editing a thesis is an important part of the writing process to
ensure that the final product is of high quality and meets academic standards.
Here are some tips for revising and editing a thesis:
1. Take a break: After completing the thesis, take a break before starting the
revision and editing process. This break can help you gain a fresh perspective
on your work and identify areas that require improvement.
2. Review the structure: Review the overall structure of the thesis and ensure
that it follows a logical sequence. Make sure that each chapter and section is
clearly labelled and easy to follow.
3. Check the language: Review the language used in the thesis and ensure that
it is clear, concise, and free of errors. Use an appropriate academic tone and
avoid colloquial language and slang.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
193
Revising and Editing the Thesis
4. Review the referencing and citations: Check the referencing and citations to
ensure that they are accurate and follow the appropriate style guide. Make sure
that all sources are cited and referenced properly.
5. Proofread: Proofread the thesis carefully for spelling, grammar, and
punctuation errors. Read the thesis out loud to catch errors that may have
been missed during silent reading.
6. Get feedback: Get feedback from a peer, a professor, or a professional
editor. An objective review can help identify areas that need improvement and
provide suggestions for how to improve the quality of the thesis.
7. Follow the guidelines: Follow the guidelines provided by your institution
and the style guide used in your discipline. This includes formatting, citation
style, and other specific requirements.
Revising and editing a thesis can be a time-consuming process, but it is
important to take the time to ensure that the final product is of high quality
and meets academic standards.
Importance of taking a break after completion of thesis before starting
proof reading
Taking a break after completing a thesis before editing it is important for
several reasons:
194
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
1. Fresh perspective: A break can help you gain a fresh perspective on your
work. When you've been working on a thesis for a long time, it can be difficult
to see it with fresh eyes. Taking a break can help you come back to your work
with a clearer mind and a more objective perspective.
2. Improved clarity: Taking a break can also help improve the clarity of your
writing. When you've been working on a thesis for a long time, it's easy to
become too close to your own work and lose sight of the bigger picture. A
break can help you step back and see your writing more clearly, which can help
you identify areas that need improvement.
3. Enhanced creativity: Taking a break can also help enhance your creativity.
Sometimes, the best ideas come when you're not actively thinking about your
work. A break can give you the mental space you need to come up with fresh
ideas and new approaches to your writing.
4. Reduced stress: Writing a thesis can be a stressful process. Taking a break
can help reduce stress levels, which can help improve your overall well-being
and mental health. This, in turn, can help you be more productive and focused
when you do return to your work.
In summary, taking a break after completing a thesis before editing it is
important for gaining a fresh perspective, improving clarity, enhancing
creativity, and reducing stress levels. It can ultimately help improve the quality
of your work and make the editing process more effective.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
195
Revising and Editing the Thesis
Importance of reviewing the structure of the thesis:
Reviewing the structure of a thesis is important for several reasons:
1. Logical sequence: A well-structured thesis follows a logical sequence that
guides the reader through the main arguments and ideas. Reviewing the
structure of the thesis can help ensure that the sequence is clear and easy to
follow, which can make the thesis more effective and engaging for the reader.
2. Coherence: A good structure also ensures that the different parts of the
thesis are coherent and connected. By reviewing the structure, you can identify
any gaps or inconsistencies in your arguments and make sure that all the
different parts of the thesis work together to support your main thesis
statement.
3. Clarity: A clear structure also helps to make the writing clearer and more
concise. By dividing the thesis into well-defined chapters and sections, you can
make the writing more accessible to the reader and avoid confusion or
misunderstanding.
4. Meeting academic standards: Many academic disciplines have specific
requirements for the structure of a thesis. By reviewing the structure, you can
ensure that your thesis meets these requirements and follows the conventions
of your field.
In summary, reviewing the structure of a thesis is important for ensuring
logical sequence, coherence, clarity, and meeting academic standards. By
paying attention to the structure of your thesis, you can create a more effective
196
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
and engaging piece of writing that effectively communicates your research and
ideas.
Language check:
Checking the language of a thesis is important for several reasons:
1. Communicating your ideas: The language used in your thesis is crucial for
communicating your ideas clearly and effectively to your audience. Using clear,
concise and precise language helps to convey your ideas accurately and ensure
that the reader understands your argument.
2. Meeting academic standards: Academic writing requires a specific style of
language that follows established conventions in your field. By checking the
language used in your thesis, you can ensure that you are meeting these
standards and presenting your work in a professional and scholarly manner.
3. Avoiding confusion: Using clear and precise language can also help avoid
confusion and misunderstanding. Academic writing can be complex and
technical, so it is important to use language that is as simple and direct as
possible to avoid ambiguity or misinterpretation.
4. Professional presentation: Checking the language used in your thesis also
helps to ensure that your work is presented in a professional and polished
manner. Grammatical errors, poor sentence structure, or awkward phrasing
can detract from the quality of your work and undermine your credibility as a
scholar.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
197
Revising and Editing the Thesis
In summary, checking the language used in your thesis is important for
communicating your ideas effectively, meeting academic standards, avoiding
confusion, and presenting your work in a professional manner. By paying
attention to the language used in your writing, you can ensure that your thesis
is clear, concise, and presents your research in the best possible light.
Importance of reviewing referencing and citations:
Referencing and citations are essential for academic writing to acknowledge
the sources of information used and to avoid plagiarism. There are various
citation styles such as APA, MLA, Chicago, and Harvard, among others. A
reference list or bibliography should include all the sources used, while in-text
citations should be used to acknowledge specific information within the text.
When citing sources, it's important to ensure accuracy, consistency, and
completeness. Additionally, it's crucial to understand the specific requirements
of the citation style being used and to follow them accordingly.
Importance of proofreading a thesis:
Proofreading a thesis is important for several reasons. Firstly, it helps to ensure
that the thesis is free of errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and syntax.
This is crucial for the clarity and coherence of the document, as errors can
distract the reader and even change the meaning of the text.
Secondly, proofreading allows the author to identify inconsistencies or gaps in
the argument, which can be corrected before submission. This ensures that the
198
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
thesis is logical and coherent, and that all the relevant information has been
included.
Thirdly, proofreading helps to improve the overall quality of the thesis, which
can have an impact on the grade or evaluation it receives. A well-written and
error-free thesis is more likely to be well-received by the examiners or
reviewers.
Finally, proofreading is an opportunity for the author to check that they have
followed the guidelines and requirements of the thesis format and citation
style. This is important to avoid losing marks for formatting or citation errors.
In short, proofreading is an essential step in the thesis writing process to
ensure that the document is error-free, coherent, and of high quality.
Importance of getting feedback of the work:
Getting feedback is an important part of the writing process as it allows the
writer to receive constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement.
Feedback can come from various sources such as peers, professors, or
professional editors.
Feedback can help the writer identify areas of improvement, such as issues
with clarity, organization, or tone. It can also help the writer to understand
how their work is being received by the intended audience and to adjust
accordingly. Additionally, feedback can help the writer to identify their
strengths and weaknesses and to develop their writing skills further.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
199
Revising and Editing the Thesis
When receiving feedback, it's important to remain open-minded and to
consider the feedback in a constructive manner. The writer should evaluate the
feedback and decide which suggestions to incorporate into their work. It's also
important to ask for clarification, if necessary, to ensure that the feedback is
fully understood.
Overall, seeking and receiving feedback is a valuable tool for improving
writing skills and producing a high-quality piece of work.
Ensuring that guidelines are followed diligently:
Ensuring that guidelines are followed is an important aspect of any writing
project. Depending on the project, guidelines may include things like
formatting, citation styles, and specific requirements for the content. It's
important to follow these guidelines to ensure that the work is accurate,
professional, and meets the expectations of the intended audience.
To ensure guidelines are followed, it's important to carefully review and
understand the guidelines before starting the project. This will help to ensure
that the writer knows what is expected of them and can avoid any costly
mistakes later on.
It's also helpful to create a checklist or plan for how the guidelines will be
implemented throughout the project. This can include things like doublechecking formatting, reviewing citation style, and ensuring that all required
content is included.
200
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Additionally, seeking feedback from peers or instructors can be helpful in
ensuring that the guidelines have been followed correctly. Another useful
strategy is to utilize tools such as style guides or formatting templates, which
can help to ensure consistency and accuracy throughout the work.
Overall, following guidelines is important for ensuring that a project is
completed accurately and professionally. By taking the time to review, plan,
and seek feedback, writers can help to ensure that guidelines are followed, and
the final product meets the intended requirements.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
201
Revising and Editing the Thesis
202
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
CHAPTER 12
Time Management and
art of staying on track
Effective time management is crucial when working on a thesis. It helps you
prioritize tasks, meet deadlines, and maintain a healthy work-life balance.
Proper time management ensures that you have enough time to conduct
research, analyze data, write, and revise your thesis. It also helps you avoid lastminute stress and burnout and ensures that you have enough time for
unexpected events, such as equipment breakdowns, unexpected results, or
personal emergencies. In short, time management is essential to ensure that
you complete your thesis on time and to the best of your ability.
Breaking up time management in a thesis can be done in the following ways:
1. Identify the key milestones and deadlines in your thesis project, such as the
research phase, data analysis, and writing up the final draft.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
203
Time Management and art of staying on track
2. Break up each milestone into smaller, more manageable tasks, and assign a
specific amount of time to each task. For example, set aside time each day for
reading relevant literature, conducting experiments, or analyzing data.
3. Use a scheduling tool, such as a calendar or a project management app, to
help you track your progress and stay on schedule.
4. Set realistic goals and be flexible, adjusting your schedule as necessary to
accommodate unexpected events or new insights that arise during the research
process.
5. Take breaks and rest to avoid burnout and maintain a healthy work-life
balance.
By breaking up time management into smaller tasks, you can stay focused,
motivated, and on track, and complete your thesis project within the given
timeline.
The ideal duration for a PhD thesis can vary depending on the academic institution, country, and field of study. In general, a PhD thesis takes between three
to five years to complete, with an average of four years.
However, it is essential to keep in mind that the duration of a PhD thesis can
depend on several factors, such as the complexity of the research question, the
nature of the data, the availability of research funding, and the individual
student's progress. It is also important to note that some PhD students may
take longer than others to complete their theses due to personal or
professional reasons.
204
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Ultimately, the length of time needed to complete a PhD thesis should not be
the only factor considered. Instead, the quality of the research, the
contribution to the field, and the ability to meet the requirements of the
academic institution should be the primary focus.
The time allocation for different tasks in a PhD thesis can vary depending on
the field of study, the research project, and the academic institution. However,
a general breakdown of the time allocation for a typical PhD thesis can be as
follows:
1. Research and Planning: This phase involves defining research questions,
conducting a literature review, and developing a research plan. It can take
between 6 to 12 months.
2. Data Collection: This phase involves collecting data through experiments,
surveys, interviews, or other research methods. It can take between 6 to 18
months.
3. Data Analysis: This phase involves processing and analyzing the collected
data. It can take between 6 to 12 months.
4. Writing: This phase involves writing up the thesis and developing the
chapters, including introduction, literature review, methodology, results,
discussion, and conclusion. It can take between 12 to 24 months.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
205
Time Management and art of staying on track
5. Revisions: This phase involves reviewing and revising the thesis to address
feedback from the supervisor or committee. It can take between 3 to 6
months.
6. Submission and Défense: This phase involves submitting the final version
of the thesis and defending it in front of the committee. It can take between 1
to 3 months.
It is important to note that these time allocations are only general guidelines,
and the actual time required for each phase can vary depending on the specific
requirements of the research project and the individual circumstances of the
student. Effective time management and planning are crucial to ensure that
each phase is completed within the required time frame.
Tips for maintaining the schedule.
Maintaining a thesis timeline can be challenging, but the following tips can
help you stay on track and meet your deadlines:
1. Set specific and achievable goals for each phase of the thesis project. These
goals should be broken down into smaller tasks that are easier to manage and
complete.
2. Create a detailed schedule that outlines each task and deadline. This
schedule should be flexible, but realistic, taking into account unexpected
events or changes in the research project.
206
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
3. Keep a record of your progress and use a project management tool or a
calendar to track your deadlines and milestones.
4. Stay organized and keep your workspace tidy. This will help you stay
focused and minimize distractions.
5. Prioritize your work and focus on the most critical aspects of your thesis
first. This will help you make progress quickly and stay motivated.
Time allotment Pie chart
Time allotment for thesis
12%
6%
12%
Research & planning
23%
24%
Data collection
Data analysis
Writing
23%
Revisions
Submission & defence
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
207
Time Management and art of staying on track
6. Avoid procrastination by breaking up larger tasks into smaller, more
manageable pieces, and rewarding yourself after each completed task.
7. Take breaks and rest to avoid burnout and maintain a healthy work-life
balance. Engage in physical activity or other activities that help you relax and
rejuvenate.
8. Stay in communication with your supervisor or committee and ask for help
or feedback as needed. This will help you stay on track and ensure that you
meet the requirements of the academic institution.
By following these tips, you can maintain your thesis timeline, stay focused and
motivated, and complete your project within the given timeline.
208
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
CHAPTER 13
Example Research topic
THE HAND HOLDING
In this chapter the author will take one ideal research topic in the field of
Otolaryngology and proceed to explain the process of completing the thesis
project.
The Topic:
Here is an example of a potential thesis topic in the field of otolaryngology:
"Assessing the efficacy of telemedicine for managing chronic rhinosinusitis in pediatric
patients."
This topic could involve a study evaluating the effectiveness of telemedicine as
a means of managing chronic rhinosinusitis in pediatric patients, potentially
comparing it to in-person care. The research could involve gathering data on
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
209
Example Research topic THE HAND HOLDING
patient outcomes, satisfaction with care, and other relevant factors, as well as
exploring the practical and logistical challenges associated with telemedicine in
this context. This topic could have practical implications for improving access
to care for pediatric patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, particularly in areas
where in-person care may be limited or unavailable.
The overview of steps:
1. Literature review: Conduct a comprehensive review of existing literature on
the use of telemedicine for managing chronic rhinosinusitis in pediatric
patients. This will help you identify knowledge gaps, research questions, and
potential hypotheses for your study.
2. Research design: Develop a research design that is appropriate for your
research question and hypothesis. Consider factors such as sample size, data
collection methods, and statistical analysis.
3. Data collection: Collect data from pediatric patients with chronic
rhinosinusitis who are receiving care either through telemedicine or in-person.
The data collected can include patient outcomes, satisfaction with care, and
other relevant factors.
4. Data analysis: Analyze the data collected and assess the effectiveness of
telemedicine in managing chronic rhinosinusitis in pediatric patients. You can
use statistical analysis to identify differences in outcomes between the
telemedicine and in-person care groups.
5. Conclusion: Draw conclusions based on your data analysis and discuss the
implications of your findings. You can also identify areas for future research.
210
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
6. Writing: Write your thesis, ensuring that it includes an introduction,
literature review, research design, data collection, data analysis, and conclusion.
Make sure to follow the guidelines provided by your institution.
7. Editing and revisions: Edit and revise your thesis to ensure it meets
academic standards and is clear, concise, and free of errors.
8. Presentation: Present your findings and defend your thesis before a thesis
committee.
By following these steps, one can complete your thesis on the topic of
assessing the efficacy of telemedicine for managing chronic rhinosinusitis in
pediatric patients.
The Research Design:
Here's an example of a possible research design for the project:
1. Research question: Is telemedicine an effective means of managing chronic
rhinosinusitis in pediatric patients?
2. Hypothesis: Telemedicine is as effective as in-person care for managing
chronic rhinosinusitis in pediatric patients.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
211
Example Research topic THE HAND HOLDING
3. Study design: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted to
compare the effectiveness of telemedicine and in-person care in managing
chronic rhinosinusitis in pediatric patients.
4. Sample size: The study will include a minimum of 50 pediatric patients
diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis.
5. Recruitment: Patients will be recruited from a single otolaryngology clinic.
6. Randomization: Patients will be randomly assigned to either the
telemedicine group or in-person care group.
7. Data collection: Patient outcomes, satisfaction with care, and other relevant
factors will be collected through a combination of patient self-report surveys
and medical records. Patients in the telemedicine group will receive care
through videoconferencing, while patients in the in-person group will receive
standard in-person care.
8. Data analysis: Data will be analyzed using statistical methods to compare
outcomes between the two groups. The primary outcome measures will be
symptom improvement, as measured by a validated symptom score, and
patient satisfaction with care.
9. Ethical considerations: The study will be conducted in accordance with
ethical guidelines and informed consent will be obtained from all patients and
their guardians.
212
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
By following this research design, you can effectively compare the
effectiveness of telemedicine and in-person care in managing chronic
rhinosinusitis in pediatric patients.
Why Randomized control trial is chosen for this study?
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is a type of study design that is
commonly used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, treatments, or
therapies. In the case of the project on assessing the efficacy of telemedicine
for managing chronic rhinosinusitis in pediatric patients, an RCT is an
appropriate study design for several reasons:
1. Minimizing bias: Randomization helps minimize the effects of bias in the
study, as patients are randomly assigned to either the telemedicine or in-person
care group. This helps ensure that both groups are similar in terms of potential
confounding variables.
2. Establishing causality: An RCT is the gold standard for establishing causality
between an intervention (in this case, telemedicine) and an outcome (symptom
improvement, patient satisfaction, etc.). By randomly assigning patients to
groups, we can more confidently attribute any differences in outcomes to the
intervention.
3. Ensuring internal validity: Randomization and blinding (if appropriate) help
ensure the internal validity of the study, meaning that any observed effects are
due to the intervention rather than other factors.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
213
Example Research topic THE HAND HOLDING
4. Ethical considerations: By randomly assigning patients to groups, we can
ensure that all patients have an equal chance of receiving the intervention,
which is important for ethical considerations.
Therefore, an RCT is an appropriate study design for evaluating the
effectiveness of telemedicine for managing chronic rhinosinusitis in pediatric
patients, as it helps minimize bias, establish causality, ensure internal validity,
and address ethical considerations.
Ethical considerations that should be considered.
There are several ethical considerations that should be taken into account in
the project on assessing the efficacy of telemedicine for managing chronic
rhinosinusitis in pediatric patients. These include:
1. Informed consent: Informed consent is a critical ethical consideration for
any research project involving human subjects. All patients and their guardians
should be provided with clear information about the study, including its
purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits, and should be given the opportunity
to ask questions and make an informed decision about whether to participate.
Since the individuals are minor parental consent is a must.
2. Privacy and confidentiality: Patients' privacy and confidentiality should be
protected throughout the study, in accordance with relevant privacy laws and
regulations. This includes ensuring that patient data is de-identified and
securely stored, and that only authorized personnel have access to the data.
214
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
3. Fair treatment: Patients in both the telemedicine and in-person care groups
should receive equivalent levels of care and attention and should not be
disadvantaged in any way by their participation in the study.
4. Monitoring and oversight: The study should be subject to ongoing
monitoring and oversight to ensure that ethical standards are maintained
throughout the study, and that any ethical issues that arise are promptly
addressed.
5. Benefits and risks: The potential benefits and risks of the study should be
carefully considered and balanced. The potential benefits of telemedicine
include increased access to care and convenience, while the potential risks
include reduced face-to-face interaction with healthcare providers and
technology-related issues.
By carefully considering and addressing these ethical considerations, the
project can be conducted in an ethical and responsible manner, ensuring that
patients are treated fairly, and their rights are protected.
The Data:
For example, suppose that the study recruited 50 pediatric patients with
chronic rhinosinusitis, and randomized them to either the telemedicine or inperson care group. Patients in the telemedicine group received care through a
remote video consultation platform, while patients in the in-person care group
received care in a clinic setting. Both groups received equivalent levels of care,
including medical treatment and symptom management.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
215
Example Research topic THE HAND HOLDING
The data collected could include several variables, such as patient
demographics, symptom severity, treatment outcomes, patient satisfaction,
and healthcare resource utilization. For example, some of the data collected
might include:
* Patient age, gender, and race/ethnicity
* Baseline symptom severity, as measured by a validated questionnaire
* Change in symptom severity over time, as measured by the same
questionnaire
* Patient satisfaction with care, as measured by a survey or questionnaire
* Number of healthcare visits or interventions required over the course of the
study
* Any adverse events or complications experienced by patients in either group
By analyzing this data, it would be possible to draw conclusions about the
effectiveness of telemedicine for managing chronic rhinosinusitis in pediatric
patients, as well as any differences between telemedicine and in-person care in
terms of treatment outcomes, patient satisfaction, or healthcare resource
utilization.
The questionnaire:
Sure, here is a sample questionnaire that could be used to collect data on
patient satisfaction:
216
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
1. How satisfied were you with the care you received for your chronic
rhinosinusitis?
Very satisfied
Somewhat satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
2. How satisfied were you with the communication between you and your
healthcare provider?
Very satisfied
Somewhat satisfied
Neutral
Somewhat dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
3. How comfortable did you feel during your appointment?
Very comfortable
Somewhat comfortable
Neutral
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
217
Example Research topic THE HAND HOLDING
Somewhat uncomfortable
Very uncomfortable
4. How easy was it to access care?
Very easy
Somewhat easy
Neutral
Somewhat difficult
Very difficult
5. How much time did you spend waiting for your appointment?
Less than 10 minutes
10-30 minutes
30-60 minutes
More than 60 minutes
6. How would you rate the quality of care you received?
Excellent
Good
218
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Fair
Poor
Very poor
7. Would you prefer telemedicine or in-person care for future appointments?
Telemedicine
In-person care
No preference
8. Do you have any other comments or suggestions about your care for
chronic rhinosinusitis?
It's important to note that this is just a sample questionnaire and that it would
need to be validated and tailored to the specific study and population being
studied. Additionally, the questionnaire could be supplemented with other
validated tools to assess symptom severity, functional status, and quality of life.
Data collected (Hypothetical)
Here is a hypothetical example of data that could be collected and analyzed in
this project:
Patient Demographics:
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
219
Example Research topic THE HAND HOLDING
50 patients in the telemedicine group, 50 patients in the in-person care group
Average age: 10 years
60% male, 40% female
75% White, 15% Black, 10% Asian
Baseline Symptom Severity:
Average symptom score (on a 10-point scale): 7 out of 10
Change in Symptom Severity:
Telemedicine group: Average symptom score at follow-up (after 3 months of
treatment): 4 out of 10
In-person care group: Average symptom score at follow-up: 3 out of 10
Both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in symptom
severity over time, with no significant difference between the groups.
Patient Satisfaction:
Telemedicine group: 90% of patients reported being satisfied with their care
In-person care group: 95% of patients reported being satisfied with their care
Both groups reported high levels of satisfaction with their care, with no
significant difference between the groups.
220
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Healthcare Resource Utilization:
Telemedicine group: Patients had an average of 2 telemedicine consultations
over the course of the study
In-person care group: Patients had an average of 2 clinic visits over the course
of the study
There was no significant difference in the number of healthcare visits or
interventions required between the groups.
Adverse Events:
No patients in either group experienced any adverse events or complications
related to their care.
Based on this hypothetical data, we can conclude that telemedicine is a safe
and effective option for managing chronic rhinosinusitis in pediatric patients,
with similar treatment outcomes, patient satisfaction, and healthcare resource
utilization as in-person care. However, it's important to note that this is just an
example of hypothetical data, and the actual results of the study could be
different depending on a number of factors.
Statistical tests that can be used in data analysis in this study:
The ideal statistical test to use would depend on the specific research question
and the type of data being analyzed. In the hypothetical project we've been
discussing, a randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the
effectiveness of telemedicine versus in-person care for chronic rhinosinusitis
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
221
Example Research topic THE HAND HOLDING
in pediatric patients. Some statistical tests that may be appropriate to analyze
the data collected in this study include:
Independent samples t-test: This test could be used to compare the mean
change in symptom severity between the telemedicine and in-person care
groups. It could also be used to compare the mean number of healthcare visits
or interventions between the groups.
Chi-squared test: This test could be used to compare the proportion of
patients in each group who reported being satisfied with their care, as well as
to compare the proportion of patients in each group who experienced adverse
events or complications.
Linear regression: This test could be used to examine the relationship between
patient demographics (such as age, gender, and race) and treatment outcomes,
satisfaction, or healthcare resource utilization.
It's important to note that the specific statistical tests used would depend on
the research question and the characteristics of the data being analyzed. It's
recommended to consult with a statistician or data analyst to determine the
most appropriate statistical tests for a given study.
Data analysis Example:
Here's an example of how you could use a chi-squared test to analyze
hypothetical data from the sample questionnaire we discussed earlier,
comparing patient satisfaction with telemedicine versus in-person care for
chronic rhinosinusitis:
222
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Assume that a total of 100 pediatric patients were enrolled in the study, with
50 randomized to receive telemedicine care and 50 randomized to receive inperson care. After completing their care, each patient was asked to rate their
satisfaction with their care as "very satisfied," "somewhat satisfied," "neutral,"
"somewhat dissatisfied," or "very dissatisfied." The following table shows the
distribution of satisfaction ratings in each group:
To determine whether there is a significant difference in satisfaction ratings
between the telemedicine and in-person care groups, we can use a chi-squared
test. The null hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in the
distribution of satisfaction ratings between the two groups, and the alternative
hypothesis is that there is a significant difference.
We can use a chi-squared test to calculate the test statistic and p-value.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
223
Example Research topic THE HAND HOLDING
Chi-squared statistic: 7.32
p-value: 0.1195
224
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Based on this result, we fail to reject the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in satisfaction ratings between the two groups, as the p-value
(0.1195) is greater than the usual threshold for statistical significance (e.g.,
0.05). However, it's important to note that this is a hypothetical example and
the results may be different in a real-world study. Additionally, there may be
other factors besides patient satisfaction that should be considered when evaluating the effectiveness of telemedicine versus in-person care for chronic rhinosinusitis.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
225
Example Research topic THE HAND HOLDING
226
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
CHAPTER 14
Overcoming writer’s
block
Writer's block is a common challenge for many writers, and there are several
strategies that you can use to overcome it. Here are some tips that may help:
1. Take a break: Sometimes stepping away from your writing and taking a
break can be helpful. Engage in a different activity, such as exercise or
spending time with friends or family, to help clear your mind.
2. Set achievable goals: Break down your writing goals into smaller, achievable
tasks. This can help you feel a sense of progress and accomplishment, which
can boost motivation.
3. Freewriting: Freewriting involves writing continuously for a set period of
time, without worrying about grammar, structure, or content. This can help
you overcome any mental blocks and get your creative juices flowing.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
227
Overcoming writer’s block
4. Change your writing environment: Sometimes a change of scenery can help
to stimulate your creativity. Consider writing in a different location, such as a
library or coffee shop.
5. Talk to someone: Discussing your ideas with a colleague, mentor, or friend
can help to clarify your thoughts and get you unstuck.
6. Seek support: If you're struggling with writer's block, consider seeking
support from a writing group or a professional coach.
Remember, writer's block is a common challenge, and it's important to be kind
to yourself and take care of your mental health. With patience and persistence,
you can overcome writer's block and continue making progress on your writing project.
Causes of writer's block:
There are many potential causes of writer's block, and the specific factors that
contribute to it can vary from person to person. Here are a few common
causes of writer's block:
1. Perfectionism: Many writers struggle with the desire to write the perfect
sentence or paragraph, which can lead to self-criticism and a fear of making
mistakes.
228
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
2. Overwhelming task: Writing a book, thesis, or dissertation can be a daunting
task that requires significant time, effort, and mental energy. It's common to
feel overwhelmed by the scope of the project and unsure where to begin.
3. Lack of inspiration: Sometimes, writers simply lack inspiration or
motivation. This could be due to a lack of interest in the topic, fatigue, or other
life stressors that are affecting their ability to focus and be creative.
4. Fear of judgment: Writers may worry about what others will think of their
work, which can lead to self-doubt and anxiety.
5. Distractions: In today's digital age, it's easy to get side-tracked by social
media, email, and other online distractions. These can prevent writers from
focusing on their work and making progress.
It's important to recognize that writer's block is a common challenge that
many writers face. By understanding the potential causes, you can take steps to
address them and overcome writer's block.
Importance of free writing in overcoming writer's block:
Free writing can be important in overcoming writer's block because it allows
the writer to bypass their inner critic and write without inhibition. By setting a
timer for a specific amount of time and writing continuously without stopping
or editing, the writer can access their subconscious and generate new ideas.
This can help break through the mental barriers that may be causing writer's
block and can provide a starting point for further writing. Additionally, free
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
229
Overcoming writer’s block
writing can help develop a regular writing habit and build confidence in one's
writing abilities.
The steps involved in free writing typically include:
1. Set a timer for a specific amount of time, such as 10-20 minutes.
2. Start writing without stopping or editing, even if the writing seems
nonsensical or unimportant.
3. Write about anything that comes to mind, whether it is related to the topic
you are trying to write about or not.
4. If you get stuck or can't think of what to write, write about that feeling or
sensation.
5. Keep writing until the timer goes off, even if you feel like you have nothing
left to say.
6. Once the timer goes off, take a break and then review what you have
written. Look for any interesting or useful ideas that you can develop further in
your writing.
By following these steps, you can use free writing to generate new ideas, break
through writer's block, and improve your writing overall.
230
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
Overcoming lack of inspiration:
Overcoming a lack of inspiration while writing a thesis can be challenging, but
here are a few strategies that may help:
1. Take a break: Sometimes, taking a break from your writing and doing
something completely different can help inspire new ideas. This could be
going for a walk, doing some exercise, or simply taking a nap.
2. Read other theses: Reading other theses in your field can help inspire new
ideas and approaches to your own work. This can also help you identify gaps
in the existing literature that you can address in your thesis.
3. Talk to others: Discussing your work with others, whether it's a fellow
student or a professor, can help you gain new perspectives and ideas. This can
also help you clarify your own thoughts and identify areas that need more
work.
4. Freewriting: Freewriting, as described earlier, can help you generate new
ideas by bypassing your inner critic and letting your subconscious mind take
over.
5. Break the task into smaller pieces: Sometimes, a lack of inspiration can stem
from feeling overwhelmed by the size of the task. Breaking it down into
smaller, more manageable pieces can help you make progress and gain
momentum.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
231
Overcoming writer’s block
6. Set a schedule and stick to it: Setting a writing schedule and committing to it
can help you overcome a lack of inspiration by forcing you to write even when
you don't feel like it. This can also help you build a regular writing habit, which
can make writing feel more natural and less daunting over time.
By trying one or more of these strategies, you may be able to overcome your
lack of inspiration and make progress on your thesis.
Overcoming fear of judgement while writing a thesis:
Overcoming the fear of judgement while writing a thesis can be a significant
challenge, but here are some strategies that may help:
1. Focus on your goals: Remember why you are writing your thesis in the first
place. Your goal is to produce a well-researched, well-written document that
contributes to your field. Keeping this in mind can help you focus on the task
at hand and worry less about what others might think.
2. Identify and challenge negative self-talk: When you find yourself thinking
negative thoughts, such as "This is terrible" or "I'm not good enough,"
challenge those thoughts by asking yourself if they are true. Often, they are
not, and reframing your thoughts in a more positive way can help you feel
more confident in your work.
3. Remember that feedback is part of the process: Receiving feedback on your
work is a normal part of the thesis writing process. Try to view feedback as an
232
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
opportunity to learn and improve your work, rather than as a judgement of
your abilities.
4. Talk to others: Discussing your work with others, such as a trusted friend or
mentor, can help you gain perspective and feel less isolated. They may also be
able to provide feedback and support that can help you feel more confident in
your work.
5. Practice self-compassion: Remember that writing a thesis is a challenging
task, and it's normal to feel anxious or uncertain at times. Practicing selfcompassion, such as being kind and forgiving to yourself, can help you feel
more comfortable with the ups and downs of the writing process.
By trying one or more of these strategies, you may be able to overcome your
fear of judgement and feel more confident in your thesis writing.
Overcoming distractions:
Overcoming distractions while writing can be challenging, but here are a few
strategies that may help:
1. Create a distraction-free environment: Try to eliminate distractions in your
physical environment as much as possible. This might mean finding a quiet
space to work, using noise-cancelling headphones, or turning off notifications
on your phone or computer.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
233
Overcoming writer’s block
2. Set a schedule: Creating a regular writing schedule can help you develop a
routine and stay focused. Set aside specific times for writing each day or week
and try to stick to those times as much as possible.
3. Break up the task into smaller pieces: Sometimes, the size of a writing
project can feel overwhelming and lead to distraction. Breaking the task up
into smaller, more manageable pieces can help you make progress and stay
focused.
4. Use a timer: Setting a timer for a specific amount of time, such as 25
minutes, and then focusing solely on writing during that time can help you stay
focused and avoid distractions.
5. Take breaks: Taking regular breaks can help you stay fresh and avoid
burnout. Try taking a 5-10 minute break every hour or so, or taking a longer
break after completing a specific writing task.
6. Minimize digital distractions: Digital distractions, such as social media or
email, can be particularly challenging to overcome. Try using apps or browser
extensions that can block access to these distractions during your writing time.
By trying one or more of these strategies, you may be able to overcome
distractions and stay focused while writing.
234
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
CHAPTER 15
Defending the Thesis:
Preparing for the Viva
Voce
Defending your thesis in a viva voce can be a daunting experience, but there
are steps you can take to prepare and increase your chances of success:
1. Know your thesis: Make sure you have a thorough understanding of your
own research, including the main arguments and conclusions, as well as any
weaknesses or limitations. This will help you answer questions confidently and
accurately.
2. Prepare for common questions: Think about the types of questions you are
likely to be asked and prepare answers in advance. Common questions might
include: What are the main contributions of your research? What are the
limitations of your research? What would you do differently if you were to
conduct this research again?
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
235
Defending the Thesis: Preparing for the Viva Voce
3. Practice with others: Ask friends or colleagues to simulate a viva voce with
you, and practice answering questions in a mock setting. This can help you feel
more comfortable and confident during the actual viva voce.
4. Familiarize yourself with the process: Make sure you understand the format
of the viva voce, including the role of the examiners and the structure of the
questioning. Understanding what to expect can help you feel more at ease.
5. Bring relevant materials: Bring a copy of your thesis, as well as any notes or
supporting materials that you think may be helpful during the viva voce.
6. Stay calm and focused: Try to stay calm and focused during the viva voce,
even if you are asked difficult or unexpected questions. Take a few deep
breaths if you feel anxious and remind yourself that you have prepared for this.
By following these steps and preparing carefully, you can increase your
chances of success in defending your thesis in a viva voce.
Knowing the thesis:
Examiner of the thesis follows the steps given below to know the thesis better.
To know the thesis, you need to identify the main argument or idea that the
author is presenting in their work. The thesis is usually a statement or a series
of statements that express the author's position on a particular topic or issue.
Here are a few steps you can take to identify the thesis:
236
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
1. Read the introduction: The introduction should provide an overview of the
main topic and the author's approach to it. Look for a statement that
summarizes the author's position or argument.
2. Look for topic sentences: In each paragraph, look for a sentence that
introduces the main idea of that paragraph. These sentences may help you
identify the overall thesis.
3. Identify key terms: Look for recurring terms or phrases that are central to
the author's argument. These may help you identify the thesis.
4. Consider the conclusion: The conclusion should summarize the main
arguments and ideas presented in the work. Look for a statement that
summarizes the author's position or argument.
5. Ask yourself what the author is trying to say: After reading the work, ask
yourself what the main message or point of the work is. This may help you
identify the thesis.
By following these steps, you can identify the thesis and gain a better
understanding of the author's argument or position.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
237
Defending the Thesis: Preparing for the Viva Voce
How to prepare for common questions?
Preparing for common questions in a thesis defence can help you feel more
confident and increase your chances of success. Here are a few steps you can
take to prepare:
1. Know your thesis: Make sure you have a thorough understanding of your
own research, including the main arguments and conclusions, as well as any
weaknesses or limitations. This will help you answer questions confidently and
accurately.
2. Review your research: Review your research and make a list of potential
weaknesses or limitations. This will help you prepare for questions related to
these areas.
3. Review related literature: Review related literature in your field and make
note of how your research contributes to the field. This will help you answer
questions related to the significance of your research.
4. Practice with others: Ask friends or colleagues to simulate a thesis defence
with you, and practice answering questions in a mock setting. This can help
you feel more comfortable and confident during the actual defence.
5. Review past defences: Review past thesis defences in your department or
field and make note of the types of questions that are commonly asked. This
can help you prepare for potential questions.
238
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
6. Prepare for the general questions: Prepare answers for general questions,
such as "What are the main contributions of your research?" or "What are the
limitations of your research?" These questions are likely to come up in most
thesis defences.
By following these steps and preparing carefully, you can increase your
chances of success in defending your thesis. Remember to stay calm and
focused, and to answer questions honestly and thoughtfully.
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process
239
Defending the Thesis: Preparing for the Viva Voce
240
From Proposal to defense: Navigating the Thesis Writing Process