_.. ._
.._
editation Affects Ethical ~=-
and Ethical Beha~=-r
167
·' to diagnose
an outlook on
~.
'an serve as
[Abstract]
How Meditation Affects Ethical Reasoning and Ethical Behavior
r.
happiness of
Kin Cheung
'lOg
Moravian University
just one
ern Buddhist
Early research on mindfulness, lovingkindness and compassion meditation investigates
eras and
their effects on ethical reasoning and ethical behavior. Unfortunately, when these studies
eon (Zen )
are cited, improving ethical reasoning or awareness or judgment is too often conflated with
dern Korea }
increasing ethical behavior. However, empirical evidence from Experimental Philosophy
nl y by their
shows a key gap between reasoning and behavior. Later studies on meditation and ethics
r respecti vc
acknowledge that there are mitigating factors that influence changing ethical behavior. This
new era ami
paper argues for the need for more multidisciplinary work to combine insights from the
"actice an d
discipline of philosophy and the field of religious studies in order to inform psychological
haracterized
research on meditation and changing ethical behavior.
P\y
r
.Jstified frorr;
168 2023
o~g.
~;r.il
~ CH~
"'- -"- -
_.
How Meditation Affects Ethical Reasoning and Ethical Behavior
and ethical
Kin Cheung
Moravian University
neoliberal \'
have impl ic '
I have
\\T i
Abstract
Early research on mindfulness, lovingkindness and compassion meditation investigates
contexts, 2
their effects on ethical reasoning and ethical behavior. Unfortunately, when these studies
understood
are cited, improving ethical reasoning or awareness or judgment is too often conflated
\Ni
l~
increasing ethical behavior. However, empirical evidence from Experimental Philosop hy
This pap r
reasomng
shows a key gap between reasoning and behavior. Later studies on meditation and ethics
acknowledge that there are mitigating factors that influence changing ethical behavior. Thi5
paper argues for the need for more multidisciplinary work to combine insights from the
whether
discipline of philosophy and the field of religious studies in order to inform psychological
on the effe .
research on meditation and changing ethical behavior.
(TM) and
i]/~
p
ethics im'ol .
Introduction
Studi es
infl uence
Since the very beginning of scientific research on the effects of meditation in the early
twentieth century, the overwhelming majority of studies investigate whether or not the
broad range of such practice s produce health benefits or improve cognitive functi on (e .g.,
concentration, focused attention, memory, etc.).1 ) In the twentyfirst century, a ne\\'
direc tion in re search inquired whether or not meditation practices affect ethical reasoning
('1
mechanisms
area of inqu •
persist ab m.!
Increase pre_
readings. H.
pro social be
1) See Cheung 2016 for an overview of the scientific research on medita tion and how philosophical
conceptions of health underlie changing trends in resear h. Though the majori ty of research provides
evidence that meditation practices improve cognitive function, some studies suggest mindfulness
meditation can lead to higher susceptibility LO aniliciaJ ly induced falsememories CRosenstreich 2016.
Wilson et al. 2015), See Cheung 20 17, 33 l0 for a summary of metaanalyses of the positive effects
of mindfulnessbased meditation.
2) See Ch w _
alongsi de h 3) See Dagar e
4) Cheung 201 5) Condon 2 0 ~
How
Meditation
~
~avior
_._......__
Affects Ethical Reasoning and Ethical Behavior
............
... .
169
and ethical behavior. Thi s is directly relevant to recent debates between l wo vocal camps.
On one side, there are cri ti cs who depict mindfulness programs as "MclVlindfulness," or fast
Kin Cheung
food meditation withouL spiriLual nutritioni.e., without ethicsthat reinforces harmful
ran University
neoliberal values. On the other side are defend ers who argue that mindfulness programs
have implicit ethics presenL and thus, explicit ethical guidelin es are not nee ded. Elsewhere,
I have ,vritten on how lhe de bate framed by th ese two positions present simplistic
rhetorical broad strokes of the relationship between ethics and human nature, usually
ignoring the historical precedent for analogous debates within and without Buddhist
nYestigate s
se studi es
contexts.2) In real ity, ethics and human nature is much more complex and better
understood al ong a spectrum .
.. i1 ated with
This paper provides an overview of the research on if and how meditation affects ethical
Philosophy
reasoning (along 'vvith ethical awareness and ethical judgment) and ethical behaviortwo
and ethics
related, yet distinct effects. Meditation is not one thing. Regarding research on specific
·ayior. This
forms of meditation and ethics, I have been unable to find peerreviewed studies on
from Lhe
whether qigong or ta/jiqll3n ilffect et bic (ll reasoning or behavior. There are limited studies
yc hological
on the effects of yoga on ethical behavior. 3 ) The studies on Transcendental Meditation
(TM) and ethics are qu estionable.4 ) The overwhelming bulk of research on meditation al1d
ethics involve mindfulness, lo vi ngkindness, and compassion meditation.
Studies show mindfulness , lovingkindness, and compa ssion mc(tilaLi on may indeed
influence ethical bch<lvior. }(esearchcrs offer only te ntative suggest ions for the possible
in the early
.' or not the
~t
ion
£'.lr y.
(e .g ..
a ne\\'
.al reasonin
mechanisms that underlie, or reasons that explain, such change in behavior. This is still an
area of inquiry in the field, as Condon's 2019 revi ew on this topic indicates, "questions
persist about the mechanisms and contexts through which meditation increases or fails to
increase prosocial behavior. "5) Condon's review provides 50 references and recommending
readings. He ends with two conclusions: certain types of meditation training increases
prosocial behavior and this increase depends on "the ethical context, the relational context,
,hilosophical
uIch provides
mind fulness
.'Lreich 201 5
iti\'e effect
2) See Cheung 20 18 for an overrielY of this contemporary debate on mindfulness and ethics situated
alongside hi storical Buddhi st and Confucian debates on ethics and human nature .
3) See Dagar et al. 2020. \ lladhu and Krishnan 200 5 show mixed results of yoga on ethical behavior.
1) Cheung 2017, 16n41.
.3) Condon 201 9, 15.
170 2023
.--
o~g
£!g
~ ~ JjI~qQ
.- .-....
.....~
....... .
,- - - - -
and preexisting personal dispositions."6) No te that he distinguishes the prosociala term
to
in the domain of psychology indicating behavior intended to benefit another or promote
good social relations, or actions that are generally positive, helpful and promoting social
acceptance and friendshipfrom the ethical.
psychol og)
Examples of prosocial behavior that meditation purports to influence include sharing,
giving up one's seat to someone who seems
more
to
charity,
increasing
concern
except wI-,
to
who shou l
be suffering or in need of the seat, donating
towards
ostracized
strangers,
.
Return
.
IncreaSll1g
environmentallyfriendlY or green habits, reducing the use of hot sauce to punish
transgressors, e tc. For Condon , prosocial behavior is one type of ethical outcome. He does
not define ethical in his review as that is outside the scope of the publication in a
psychology journal. Ethics is a term in the domain of philosophy. The earliest philosophers
in millennia past have debated, and they continue today to rigorously argue over gray areas
in ethics.
There is a misconception that studying ethics is merely memonZIng ethical or moral
behavior. In other words, ethical education is learning that to murder is wrong, to save lives
is good, to lie is wrong, and to be hones t is the right thing to do. In actuality, to study
medi ta Lion
meditation
lead to
to murder, or to tell a lie? Is it ever ethically permissible, or even an ethical obligation,
to not save a life or not tell the truth? If you think you have an obvious answer to any
of these questions, know that there are plenty of intelligent, thoughtful, caring people who
believe in the opposite answer as obvious, intuitive, or correct after meticulous
consideration.
For this paper:
III
to help
\.. 1 '
v\'hich car,
combi ned
val ues
;m r
can recluc p
ethical b
~
with other
ethics is to ask: when is it, if ever, ethically permissible, or even an ethical obligation, to
lie in order to save a life? Is it ever ethically permissible , or even an ethical obligation,
i l1~
Howe\"er
behavior i
the mec ha"
importanc
weight un '"
2018 syS[
prosocial
evidence
I simply take ethics as the English word Ivith a Greek origin, and morality, with a Latin origin.
to refer to the same thing: the concern for be havior or character as good or bad, and the distinction
between right and wrong. Some have posited sp ecial distinctions between ethics and morality, with
the former reserved for how an individu al ought to live , and the latter concerning how one ought
to treat others. However , there does not seem to be enough agreement on this distinction, or how
7) Cheung _ For mor '
karmic c
9) Tang et 2 _
10) Scientis.s
8)
public
6) Ibid , 17.
a L ~
Franco egenerale
__
_ ___
How Meditation Affects Ethical
- - ------------_.
_ ._ .._
,ocial-a term
......
Reasoning and Ethical Beh;:!VIor
..•.•. ..
...
..•..
171
to separate th e domains of ethi cs and morality. Another common practice is to use them
int erc hange ably, but I will stick with the terms ethics and ethical for this paper 7J
r or promote
moting social
...
except when citing others or referring to the convention of the fi eld of study, such as moral
psychology. It is outside the scope of this paper to address the metaethical ques ti ons of
.Iude sharing,
-eat, donating
increasing
. e to punish
me . He do es
lication in a
=>.
philosophers
r gray areas
who should or gets to dec ide if an action is (more or less) ethica1. 8 )
Returning to the question of the mechanisms that underlie how certain typ es of
meditation may affect ethical behavior, researchers propose a few possible reasons. Some
meditation training improves self-awareness and increases empathy, both of whi d1 can
lead
to
more ethical behavior when cmpathy for others and self- awareness of one's \ralue
to help others is in alignnwl1 L. Additionally, mcdiwli on l11iiY improve cogni tive fun ction .
\vhich can help in rlividuals think morc clearly aml make morc reasoned deci sions. Thi
combined with increased self- cl\vareness can help individua ls be more aware of Uwir own
value'S ;.mel the potenti al impact of their ilClions on oL hers. There is evidence that meditatiol1
~
;::-al or moral
.0
save lives
.lY, to study
'1bligation, to
can reduce negative emotions such as anger and aggression, and this may lead to more
ethical behavior. 9 ) Finally, meditation may lead to a greater sense of interconn ectedn ess
with others, which can encourage ethical behavior.
However, it is important to note that the relationship between meditation and e thical
behavior is complex and not fully understood. More research is needed to fully understand
the mechanisms by which meditation may influence ethical behavior. I note here the
swer to any
peop le who
meticulous
importance of meta-studies and meta-analyses and the need to avoid placing too much
weight on any individual study as definitive proof or strong evidence.1 0 ) Kreplin et al.'s
2018 systematic revi ew and meta - analysis shows only a moderate and limited increase in
prosocial behavior after meditati on interventions. Nevertheless, moderate and limited
evidence still should be take n seri ously as promising areas of investigation.
a Latin origin,
the distinction
7) Cheung 2015, 378.
morality, with
8) For more on the difficul ties within the Budd hist context of ethical action and skillful means, in terms of
karmic consequences for the agent. see Cheung 2015
9) Tang et al. 2007.
10) Scientists acknowl edge the impcnaI1! problems of the replication criSI S in sc ientifi c studies and
publication bias affe cting i ndi vi du.~j
studies. See Shrout and Rodgers 2018, Loken and Gelman 2017,
Franco et al. 2014. and Thorton and Lee 2000. Studi es are also retracted, but their retracti on does not
generate the same influence Q
puiar media reports of such studies' results.
ow one ought
Ethical Reasoning is Not Equivalent to Ethical Behavior
emotional
With this background eSLablished, I \vant to funher explain the difference between
change in ethical reasoning (and its related terms ethical awareness and ethical judgment)
des,
Il1
\ lI
from change in ethical behavior. "Shapiro, lazaieri, and Goldin's 2012 study asserted then
mindfulness meditation leads to increased ab ility for ethical reasoning, However, there is
still a gap between increased ability for ethical reasoning and change in ethical behavior
(although they are linked, that link must be addressed),"ll) This gap can be illustrated with
no eviclen
empirical data,
Ethicists
are
Hmvever. _
philosophers
who
are
professional
experts
m ethical
reasomng,
Nevertheless, the studies in Experimental Philosophy conducted by Schwitzgebel and his
collaborators found that professional ethicists do not behave significantly more or less
ethical than other professors,12) They have compared behaviors that range from the trivial
to the consequential, incl uding:
these user_
Awarer.
example.
awarenes:,
Nutritioni
the gener"
voting in public elections, calling one's mother, eating the meat of mammals, donating to charity.
the super
littering, disruptive chatting and door slamming during philosophy presentations, responding to
Yet, that
student emails, attending conferences without paying registration fees, organ donation, blood
dietary ba
~
donation, theft of library books, overall moral evaluation by one's departmental peers, honesty in
responding to survey questions, and joining the Nazi Party in 1930s Germany,l:l)
front of a
when I n
Even though ethicists were much more likely to have higher ethicaJ standards, such as
healthier
being more likely than the general public to judge that eating meat is unethical or
Converse.
recommend giving a higher percentage of one's income to charity, ethicists do not, on
exercise ; ~
average, eat less meat or give more to charity compared to others around them,
a scre en.
Related to ethical reasoning is ethical awareness. McGuire's 2020 article examines
Return i
Buddhist-inspired mobile phone applications. that claim to promote or "develop greater
behavior;:,.
11) Cheung 2018, 318, emphasis in the originaL 'Additionally. Purser (2015) noted that the flaws in this
study include its reliance on self-reported data fro m a scale and questionnaire that are recently called
into question and its basis "on an extremely small sample size of 25 , mostly Caucasian women, lacking
both randomized and ac tive control group s" (ibid) .
12) Schwitzgebel 2019, 21-32.
13) Schwitzgebel 2019, 23.
Cor,
or _
14) McGlJI[
15) Ibid, -::;
How Meditation Affects Ethical Rf'..asomng and Ethical Behavior 173
emotional and ethical awareness" for users.1 4 ) One such app, Mitra, which was
:e between
: judgment)
rted that
r. there is
designed and developed by the Dalai Lama Center for Ethics an d Transformative Values at NIIT
in partnership with Hope Lab (hltPs://hopelab.org/), was inspired by Buddhist notions of a
"virtuous friend" (Sanskrit kalY3J)a-mitra)'. By helping users identify their core va lues, cultivate
emotional awareness , and align their emotions with their values, they hope that users can
"positive ly transform the mind" so that it becomes "a better friend and allY,"l ,)
_al behavior
(ra ted wi th
However, a similar gap remains bet\vepn ethical awareness and ethical behavior. There is
no evidence to indicate users of such apps behave more ethically. Although the hope is for
reasonmg.
_ bel and hi s
.....re or less
the trivial
these users to change behavior, there is no evidence of such change.
Awareness of what is ethical does not translate into ethical action . To give a relatable
example, most of us know what are better or healthier habits. But this knowledge,
awareness, judgment, or rationale is not enough to alter habits such as diet or exercise.
Nutritionists understand this is as an important problem and issue to overcome in order for
the general public to develop better eating habits. I have the knowledge and awareness that
:,:0:; to charity,
~I's
pondig
to
:lalion, blood
-;;. honesty in
the super sweet, fatty, or salty ultra-processed junk fo od I like to consume is bad for me.
Yet, that does not translate into eating less junk food. It takes more for me to change my
di etary habits than simply re asoning or awareness. This is not about eating mindlessly in
front of a screen, shoving food in my mouth without thought or care. This is to say even
when I mindfully eat ice cream or potato chips, I am still fully aware that there are much
--ds, such as
healthi er snack alternativE's that I choose not to consume over my favorite junk foods.
ne thical or
Conversely, I have full awareness and kn owledge of the reasoning behind why regul ar
o not, on
exercise is better for my body and health than sitting for hours uninterrupted in fr ont of
m.
a screen . Nevertheless, it takes more than judgment of healthier habits to alter such habits.
exammes
lop greater
fl aws in this
cently called
men, lacking
Returning to ethical reasoning and behavi or, there are experiments that do show
behavioral differences between meditation practitioners and control populations.
Condon, Desbordes, Mill er . and DeSteno's (20 13 ) stud y state d th at after 8 weeks of mindfulness
or compassion meditation , practi tione rs exhibit ed increased ethical behavior compared to
14) JvlcGuire 2020. 43.
15) Ibid, 45.
174 2023
o~:;g
~lqf
-----------------------------------------------
non -meditators. Briefly . their experiment tesl d -ubjects I\-ho med itated against subjects \I'ho did
not and found that meditators were five times more likely than non-meditators to act in a situation
where they were able to all evi ate someone who appeared to be suffering in pain. That same core
group of researchers in t\ortheastern [University J conducted anot her stud y to inves tigate hOI\"
In other ,
to better
iTlsufficien'
exactly docs compassion meditation lead to in creas s ethical beha\·ior. Lim , Condon, and DeSteno's
(2015) find ings concluded that it does not have to do with any increase ability to detec t pain or
decode e motional experi ence s of other peop le. Ot her recent stud ies on compassion meditation
Anoth r
ethical b '
include Leiberg, Klimecki , and Singe r's (2011) study. whi ch found compassion meditation training
address
led to increases in prosoc ial behavior. \oVeng et al.·s (20 13) study found that comp assion
show that
meditation "increased altruistic redi s tri bution of fund s to a victim encountered outside of the
training context" (p. 1171).
In addition, rese arch has been done on how measures of increased mindfulness are correlated
to increased ethical and prosoc ial behavior. Thes e st udies are not train ing subjects
111
mindfulness -based practices, rath er they measure if subjects are higher or lower on a
self-reported mindfulness scale that sco res how well the individ ual is aware of his or her present
experienc e and su rrounding environment ( Amel, Manning, & Scott , 2009; Brown & Kasser, 2005:
"In terms
recent re_
motivalior.
applicalior
others) re
r e duc
Jacob, Jovic, & Brinkerhoff, 2009 ). Howev er, co rrelation is not causation, and individual studies
to
may have flaws. It would take more research and detailed meta-analyse s to a ga in mean ingful
changing
grasp on how mindfulness-based prac ti ce s influence the individual. The researchers interested in
social behavior, espe cially co ncerning sustainability and the env ironment, would benefit from
foHo wing my proposed di rec tion of research for mindfulness-based practices' relation to ethical
change. These studies show researchers' interest in wheth er or not , and if so how, meditative
practices le ad to ethical change .16)
Hopefully, this
1S
a direction that researchers will continue to pursue.
Furthermore, there is evidence that changes in behavior do occur when meditation
1.1
~
reasonmg
To be _.
am poin ti r
the gap i
to high li
awarene"
practice is coupled with expJjcit trajnjng on knowledge of behavior biases and the process
to mean c'
of decision making. This is shown by
or not e.-.
studies that specificall y investigate the relationship betwee n mindfu lness -based practices and
Changing E-
behavior insi ght s training in the context of changing decision making, suc h as those by Rachel
Lilley et al. and Jessica Pyke tt et al. both in 2016. Combin ing mindfu lness-based pract ices and
behavior change training led participants to "in creased insight into the role of emotions and
So \Vba
cogniti ve biases in deci sion making."1?)
16) Cheung 2018, 318. At the time that I wrote this. I I as referring to Condon, DeSteno, and Lim making
up the core of the researchers affiliated wi th ;\ortheaste rn University. As of 2023, Condon and Lim
are based at other institutions .
17) Pykett et al. 2016 , 3; Li lley et al 20 16.
18) Kotera
19) Ibid.
20) Thi s E
sho\I'S
author!'
--,-,...
' cl bjects who did
;Jet in a situation
. That same core
im'estigate how
and DeSteno's
"1 ,
detect pain or
·sion meditation
Affects Ethical Reasoning and
_ , '- - - - - - -H - -1editation
-- ,- -,- - - - - -"..
..
Ethical Behavior
175
,
In other words, assumi ng that the empirical evidence that some meditative practices lcad
to better ethical reasoni ng and inc reased ethical avvareness is valid, these changes are still
insufficient for changing ethical behayior.
Another related term in mindfulness research is ethical judgment. In the context of
ethical behavior in running businesses and corporations, busine ss schools have tried to
it 31ion training
address unethical behavior by increasing ethics training or education. However, studies
lat compassion
show that increased ethical training, unsurprisingly, does little to change ethical behavior.
,utside of the
are correlated
subje cts in
"In terms of understancling how business students formulate and apply ethical judgements,
recent research findings indicate that other factors likely to play an important role are
motivation and self-compassion."lS)
Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation affects the
lower on a
r her present
application of ethical judgments. "A compassionate outlook (whether towards oneself or
Kasser, 2005;
others) relates to ethical judgement because it is associated with less egoistic bias, leading
l:viclual studies
to reduced acceptance of an individual's own unethical conduct."19) This is to say that
"ain meaningful
changing ethical behavior requires more than training or education in ethical judgment,
'i
•. I
rc:
int erested in
benefit from
reasomng, or awareness.
ion to ethic al
To be clear, I do not wish to conflate reasoning \vith awareness or judgment. Rather, I
,\', meditative
am pointing out the gap between each of the above and behavior. I am also not saying that
the gap is not ackno\vledged by researchers conducting the specific studies. \Vbat I wish
to highlight is that when specific studies on meditation's effects on ethical reasoning,
- meditation
awareness, or judgment are cited, others take those studies as evidence for ethical change
(he process
to mean changing ethical behavior. 20 ) This is especially re 'levant to the debate on whether
or not explicit ethical training is needed in minclfulness programs.
> raetices
and
Changing Ethical Behavior
. se by Rachel
practices and
emotions and
.J Lim making
1don and Lim
So what does lead to change in ethical behavior? Elsewhere, I have argued for an
18) Kotera et a!. 2018, 1134 .
19) Ibid.
20) This is especially the case \"hen Shapiro et 81. 2012 is cited, As of January 6, 2023, Google Scholar
shows this article has been ci ted over 240 times. A cursory glance of the papers citing it show many
authors conflating reason ing with behavior.
176 2023
o ~§g
~;(l!q
-------------------------------------
understanding of a difficult passage in the \\TIUn"S of the thirteenth century Japanese Zen
in terven lio
monk Dagen Ubt:; 1200-1253 ).21) This passage can be illuminated by understanding how
religious e
~
change in ethical behavior could be a result of a changing sense of self.
scholars (f
Ethical philosophy in the West is mainl y concern ed with normative ethics and metaethics, with
growing atte ntion to applied e thics. Less attention is paid towards exac tl y how or why an agent's
ethical values undergo change, Charles E. Harris .II'. and John T. Noonan Jr. point out how new
experi enc es, mentioning Catholi c religious experience, can lead to ethical change. Charles
Hirschkind's recent anlhropological study of IV!uslims in Ca iro listening to casse tte tapings of
sermons as a form of et hi cal self-cultivation is a step in this direction. Thomas Csordas has
fi eld of m
field of
el
Combinir future r
written on religious experiences of Catholic Charismatic healing in l'\evv England and its role in
al.'s 2022
(re)constructing the self, into a ·sacred self." It is another voice that echoes the assertion of how
behavior.
religious experiences affects the (re)constru ction and transformation of the sense of self.
Although work ha s been done on religious experien ce s, and cha nge in sense of se lf in relation to
asking:
et hical change, explicit linking of the two is lacking.
Carol Gilligan pre sents how change in sense of self affects change in ethical judgment ,
suggesting change in et hi cal values. yet what I have explored is not a change in values per se.
The issue addressed here is not psYchological, not about motivati ons for ethical change, but rath er.
the process that leads to change in behavi or. Thus, ethical judgment need not compl icate th e
picture. Ethi cal val ues ne ed not change, as the value to not do evil or harm oneself is constant.
but the sense of self changes, to encompass other beings, such that one is unable to do evil to
the ot her, as that other is no longer see n as fully other.
An interesting consequence of this is that change in ethical value or judgment is not ne cessary
for change in ethical behavior, that is if ethical value and behavior can be meaningfully separated
... For instance a person can think he or she values an ethical principle in theory, yet in practice
\\11a
ans\
sens
is "
mora
jud
in
J
corr
wit...
slr:.
does not act on such principl es. If a maj or concern of ethics is to affect decision making (say , by
creating clear principles or guidelines). then how behavior is changed, specifically by religious
In other
experience, should be taken into account. 22 )
to consid
reasomn ,
Therefore, research on meditation and ethi cal change can benefit from paying attention to
religi ous experience during or resulting fr om meditative practices.
The main difficulty for research to be conducted on religi ous experiences from
meditative practices is due to high number of hours of practice correlated with significant
religious experience s. In other words, the commonly studied eight-week meditation
21) Cheung 2017, 124-155.
22) [bid, 148-150.
componen.
map onto
with an a
vjpassana: ~
4) apply-i r.
23) Dhaka
-- __
How Meditation Affects Ethical Reasoning and Ethical Behavior 177
- - - - - - - - - - - -.- .- ..
.............
...... ........................-.-.
_.
intervenLions are rarely rnough hours of meditation experience that lead to meaningful
religious experiences.
Furthermore, not only would researchers of meditation benefit from collaboration with
scholars of religious studies, but they would also gain from partnership with experts in the
thi es, with
an agent's
field of moral psychology-yvhich is more interested in studying ethi cal change than the
field of ethical philosophy.
Combining insights from moral psychology and religious studies would be fruitful for
tapings of
_50rdas has
future research. For instance, like the results of some studies mentioned above, Dhaki1 et
it s role in
al.'s 2022 article recognizes the multiple components required for change in ethical
-un of how
behavior. They begin their study on Buddhist mindfulness meditation at the workplace by
of self.
rr lation to
'udgment,
1,-\'hat must happen psychologically for ethical actions to take place? Moral psychology literature
per se.
blll rather,
sensitivity, moral reasoning, moral motivation, and moral courage CRest, 1994). "Moral sensitivity"
licate the
is the fir st sub-process that involves becoming aware that an ethical probl em exi sts, By becoming
E.'S
~
asking:
answers this question by highlighting the sub-processes underlying ethical behavior: moral
constant,
morally sensitive, individuals can understand how their actions might affect others. "Moral
Jo evil' to
judgment" is the second step where an individual determines the morally correct course of action
ne cessary
correct action. "Moral courage" involves carrying out the morally correct action even when faced
'eparated
with opposition, fatigue, and distractions while developing and implementing sophisticated
in a given context. "Moral motivation" refers to an individual's drive to follow the chosen morally
n prac tice
strategies to reach one's goals. 23 )
-;: ( say, by
religious
In other words, what many of the earlier studies on meditation and ethics failed to do is
to consider other necessary components for change in ethical behavior in addition to ethical
ntion to
. e s from
nifcat~
meditation
reasoning, awareness, or judgment. Bre<lking down the necessary requirements into four
components, Dhab et a!., delineate vipassana practice into component elements in order to
map onto change in ethical behavior. They found in their sample of fourteen meditators
with an average of 14.1 years of meditation experience that there are six elements of
vipassana: 1) developing a\\arcness: 2) practicing equanimity: 3) noticing impermanence:
4) applying the moral fri1mework: S) cultivating loving-kindness: and 6) making continuous
23) Dhaka et al. 2022, 2,
- --_ .. ..
_
-
",.. .
diversity of h.•
' ur .hermo re, Dhaka et a!. proposes that th ese six factors contribute in various ways tv
mechanisms for ethical behavior: 1) pursuing a spiritual life; 2) maintaining inner
ny: and 3) becoming kind. Their use of the gerund for the elements and mechanism.
.i
" L lb
sixth element of continuous effort. In other 'vvords, changing ethical behavior
not examine
practi ces? Ul .
inves ti gation . "t1
. ps constant vigilance and diligence.
scholars of r
van tage poi L
nelusion
thi
pape r, I provided an overview of research on how mindfulness, lovingkindness .
ompassion meditation, affect ethical reasoning (along with ethical awareness and
•_aI judrrment) and ethical behavior. I explained why improving ethical reasoning or
_. aJ awareness is not suffici ent (and my Dogen example explains why it is neithc:'
,t>
sar y ) for altering ethical behavior. Some researchers are investigating mechanisms
d change in ethical behavior. However, this gap between ethical reasoning and ethica:
-nor is woefully under-acknowl edged in clinical research in psychology and
in ethical philosophy .
ere is promise that meditation may influence ethical behavior when coupled with other
aLing factors that include: contexts (ethical and relational), personal dispositions,
liciL training in how emotions and cognitive biases affect decision -making, and
:i uaus explicit effort in improving ethical behavior.
'::":mpared to the 14.1 years of average meditation experience
111
the sample population
XCIIiined by Dhaka et al.'s study, novice meditators, who complete popular and highly
. d eight-week training programs, are on a comple tely different level. The questi on for
r .:earchers to investigate is if combining eight-week meditation programs with explicit
:uems and mechanisms for changing ethical behavior would create a bigger effect or
er lasting change compared to other active interventions. Or, as researchers have found
nen measuring hea'lth benefits of mindfulness, would such bene fits be indistinguishable
- m taking tennis lessons or engaging in art therapy? Perhap s some populations would
fit more or less from meditation compared to other active interventions as the
___
editation
Affects Ethical
Reasoning
and Ethical Behavior 179
- -----_
... ..
.•.
diversity of human beings sho\\ again and again that one size does not fit all. Neither does
'"'ous ways to
one type of meditation \york for all. There should be research done to compare mindfulness
3lnmg mner
with lovingkindness with compas sion meditati on on ethical behavior. Why stop there, why
mechanisms
not examine qjgong, tar!i, D/I, yoga , and the rich diversity of Buddhist meditative
behavior
practices? Ultimately, this is a multidisciplinary research project and promising area of
):31
investigation that would benefit from collaboration among psychologists, philosophers, and
scholars of re ligion as all three groups are interested in ethi cal change from different
vantage points.
-ngkindness,
are ness and
""'asonll1g or
• is neither
mechanisms
.: and ethical
ology and
j
with other
Ji spositions,
- ~
a king
,
and
,~
population
l1f
and highly
uestion for
,\i th explici',
r effe ct or
~
have foun
[ingui shable
;:tions wou l
. ns as thF'
'80
2023 D~£l.g
~A1tH:2j
----------------------------HealII: _
References
Dagar, Ch' sustainable behavior: Pondering attention and awareness as means for increasing greer.
Build .
Sclf -
behavior. Ecopsychology, l( 1), 14-25.
1912
Ame!, Elise. L., i'vTanning, Christie. M., & Scott, Britain. A. 2009. Mindfulness and
Dhaka, Hi.....
Brown, Kirk. W., & Kasser, Tim. 2005. Are psychological and ecological well-being
compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research.
Workl
74(2), 349-368.
Busin
Condon, Paul. 2019. "Meditation in Context: Factors That Facilitate Prosocial Behavior."
http s:
Franco . •-\~
Current Opinion in Psychology 28 (August): 15-19.
.
Scieli\..
https:j/doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018 .09.0 11.
http s:
Condon, Paul, Desbordes, Gaelle, Miller, Willa B., & DeSteno, David. 2013. Meditation
increases compassionate responses to suffering. Psychological Science, 24, 2125-2127.
GiHigan. C
Der'e ..
956797613485603.
The Journal of Buddhist Ethics 22 (2015): 371-399.
Harris, Jr..
Souc/; ,
https://b logs .dickinson.edu/buddhistethics/ fi les/20 15/08/JBE -Cheun~fi3l14.pd
Hirschkin
Cheung, Kin. 2015. "Ethical Implications of Upaya-Kausalya: Helping Without Imposing."
Cheung, Kin. 2016. Translated by Jin-Young Jang and Seong-Hun .To.
" q:lAJZ!T~9-o1%
{l¥-7}011111J.i :t:.!i!..7-}o1111j.£ [The Shift in Meditation Research Subjects from Experts
to
Coun:
.Tacob, Je:--
Novices]." In r§1}J7}/ilif- [Meditation and Healing}, edited by Nae Chang Han, The
we11-
Institute of Mind Humanities Series 13, 235-253. Iskan, South Korea: Wonkwang
of life
University Press.
Indica
Cheung, Kin. 2017. "Meditation and Neural Connections: Changing Sense(s) of Self in East
Kotera, y..
Asian Buddhist and Neuroscientific Descriptions." Ph.D . dissertation, Temple
Busin
University.
InLen:
http://digital.library.temple.edu/cdrnlref!co11ection/p 2458 0 1co111 0/id/4 25864.
http
Broader Context." In Handbook of Ethical Foundations of Mindfulness, edited by Steven
Kr eplin . l
Medi-
Stanley, Ronald E. Purser, and Nirbhay N. Singh, Mindfulness in Behavior Health Series
htt ps
Cheung, Kin. 2018. "Implicit and Explicit Ethics in Mindfulne ss -Based Programs in a
9, 305-32l. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
~
Leiberg.
https :j/link-springer-com.libproxy .temple.eduichapteri1 0.1 007/978 - 3 - 319 76538-
1l1crea
9_16
e1T .
Csordas, Thomas 1. 1997. The Sacred Self' A Cultural Phenomenology of Charismatic
Lill ey,
a
"NIin
How Meditation Affects Ethical Reasoning and Ethical Behavior
• _ _ _ 0_ _._.
181
HeaIJilg. University of Crtlifornia Press.
Dagar, Chirag, Ashish Pandr:y. ami i\iinkya Navare. 2022. "How Yoga-Based Practices
and
dSlrJg green
Build Altruistic Behavior? Examining the Role of Subj ective Vitality,
Self-Transcendence, and Psychological Capital." Journal of BUSIneSS Ethics 175 0) :
191-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 1055 1-020-04654 -7.
-be ing
Research,
Dhaka, Himanshu, Rajen K. Gupta, and Tanuja Sharma. 2022. "Moral Development at the
Workplace through Buddhist Nlindfulness Meditation: A Grounded Theory StUdy."
Business Perspectives and Research, December, 1-18.
-ehavior."
https://doi.org/10.1177/22785337221132 612.
Franco, Annie, Neil Malhotra, and Gabor Simonovits. 2014. "Publication Bias in the Social
Sciences: Unlocking the File Drawer." Science 345 (6203): 1502-5.
" Jitation
_:25-2127.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484 .
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a DIfferent Voice: Psychological Th eory and Women's
Development. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
'mposing."
Harris, Jr., Charles E. 2005. "Reflective Equilibrium as a Theory of Moral Change."
Southwest PhIlosophy Review 21 (2): 67-82.
Hirschkind, Charles . 2006. The Ethical Soundscape: Cassette Sermons and Islamic
~
+ 7.-l1 o j,%:
cperts to
::Ie.. The
rk\\"ang
Counterpublics. Cultures of His to ry . New York: Columbia University Press.
Jacob, Jeffrey., Jovic, EmilY. , & Brinkerhoff, Merlin B. 2009. Personal and planetary
well-being: Mindfulness meditation, pro- environmental behavior and personal quality
of life in a survey from the social justice and ecological sustainability movement. Social
Indicators Research, 93(2), 275-294.
If in East
Kotera, Yasuhiro, Elaine Conway, and William Van Gordon. 2019. "Ethical Judgement in UK
Business Students: Relationship 'v\lith Motivation, Self-Compassion and Mental Health."
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 17 (5): 1132-46.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-0034-2.
- 1Tl
a
i Steven
- h Series
Kreplin, Ute, Miguel Farias. and Inti A. Brazil. 2018. "The Limited Prosocial Effects of
Meditation: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis." Scientific Reports 8 (1): 2403.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41 598 -018-20299-z.
Leiberg, Susanne, Klimecki , Olga. & Singer, Tania. 201l. Short-term compassion training
- - 6538 -
.""maLic
increases prosocial behav ior in a newly developed prosocial game. PLoS One, 6(3),
el7798.
Lilley, Rachel, Mark vVhi tebead. Rac.hel Howell, Rhys Jones, and Jessica Pykett. 2016 .
"Mindfulness, Behaviour Change and Engagement in Environmental Policy." Pniysgol
,-,-""_ ... ,""",,,,,_
_._...
......,,._._ ,,_ ...
,""
------
.., -,, "., ,'----
- - - -_ , - , , - ..
Aberystwyth / Aberystwyth University"
http://cadair.aber.ac . uk/dspace/handle/21GO/ 43113.
Lim, Daniel, Condon, Paul, & DeSteno, David. 2015. iVlindfulness and compassion: An
examination of mechanism and scalability.PLoS One, 10(2), e01l8221.
Statt"_
Thornt on . .
Con.
http s :
Loken, Eric, and Andrew Gelman. 2017. "Measurement Error and the Replication Crisis.·'
Science 355 (632 5 ): 584-85. https:!/doi.org/l0.1126/science.aaI3618.
Madhu, B. and Venkat R. Krishnan. 2005. "Impact of Transformational Leadership and
Karma-Yoga on Organizational Citizenship Behavior" Prestige Journal of Managem ent
and Research 9 0): 1-20.
Noonan, Jr., John T. 1993. "Development in Moral Doctrine." Theological Studies 54 (11):
662-77.
Psycl"
Purser, Ronald. E. 2015. Clearing the muddled path of traditional and contemporary
mindfulness: A response to J\!Ionteiro, Must en, and Compson. Mindfuln ess, 60), 23-15.
https://doi.org/l0.l007/s12671 -014-0373-4
Pykett, Jessica, Rachel Lilley, Mark Whitehead, and Rachel Howell. 2016. "Mindfulness,
Behaviour Change, and Decision Making: An Experimental Trial." University of
Birmingham, Birmingham. http://cadair .aber.ac.u!</d space/handle/2160/ 43141.
McGuire, Beverley. 2020. "Buddhist-Inspired Self-Tracking Apps: Tracking Emotions and
Values in a Digital Era." Journal of the Japanese Association for Digital Humanities 5
(2): 4,3-60. https:!/doi.org/l0.17928/jjadh.5.2_43.
Rosenstreich, Eyal. 2016. "Mindfulness and False -Memories: The Impact of Mindfulness
Practice on the DRM Paradigm." The Journal of Psychology 150 0): 58-7l.
https:!/doi.org/l0.l080/00223980.2015.1004298.
SchwitzgebeL Eric. 2019 . A Theory of Jerks and Other PhIlosophical Misadventures.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Pre s s.
Shrout, Patrick E., and Joseph L. Rodgers. 2018. "Psychology, science, and knowledge
construction : Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis." Annual review of
psychology 69, no. 1 (2018): 487-510.
Shapiro, Shauna L., Jazaieri, Hooria, & Goldin, Phillipe R. 2012. Mindfulne ss-based stre ss
reduction effects on moral reasoning ami de cision -making. The Journal of Positive
Psychology, 7(6), 504-515.
Tang, Yi-Yuan, Yinghua Ma, Junhong Wang, Yaxin Fan, Shigang Feng, Qilin Lu, Qingbao Yu,
e t al. 2007. "Short-Term Meditation Training Improves Attention and
Self-Regulation." Proceedings of the
(2 012
ational Academy of Sciences of the United
.....
-.- -...-
- .........
How Meditation AffeCtS Etllica! Reasoning and Ethical Behavior 183
-~
States of America 10,1 (.13 ) : 17152-56. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707678104.
Thornton, Alison, and Peter Lef' . 2000. "Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Its Causes and
-~s
i on:
An
Consequences," Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53 (2): 207-16.
https://doi.org/10.10 16/S08D5 - 4356(99)00161 -4.
ation Crisis."
Wilson, Brent M., Laura Micke s, Stephanie Stolarz- Fantino, Matthew Evrard, and Edmund
Fantino. 2015. "Incre ase d Fal se -Memory Susceptibility After Mindfulness Meditation."
r s hip and
. .'Janagement
Psychological Science 26 (0): 1567-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615593705 .
Weng, Helen Y., Fox, Andrew S., Shackman, Alexander 1., Stodola, Diane E., Caldwell,
Jessica Z. K., Olson, Matthew.
rlie 5 54 (4):
c.,
Rogers, Gregory M., and Davidson, Richard 1.
(2013). Compassion training alters altruism and neural responses to suffering.
Psychological Science, 24(7), 1171-1180 .
. porary
, 1 ), 23-45.
n
:;ndfulness,
iry of
f""1o tions and
. manities 5
indfulness
- ' -;T
"fllUres.
owl edge
re view of
- ased stress
f Positive
ingbao Yu.
ie United
.,
.~
roIr
~
~K
'1<1
J
fl\
5'
olnJ
"'0"":.J
:c
nr
oj
r1f
~
0
roO
C
Ufo
11.1 0
J IJ
tH
~
~
'i1f ~
OFJ ;KiA
'iO
Kf ~
~
'3lJ JIJ
JIJ ~
T ~
J
~
'3l
ollll
7iif
;KnJ
n- rt
~o
1)J ~ o
I
pO
~!l
or
,..ll..
10,
0
j- '0 olJ n: ~
r!l .J.J D~J
o ~
n-
.
rI
rujJ
1)J lijnJ 'GjJ
~ I" ~Jojo 'PjJ
Wjo
~I-
.J.J ~
;2
'OJ :n~J
,10
<,0
IT
K
p O 0\1ll ~
~
1)J DI
. 0\0 ~
Kr
<!fU
lOr
O~J
'K1
~ ;J
'it ~
rl ~
0
~
'0 of
pJ
"
~
tJ1 ~
1)J
_ 'ilil!
"0
'p
,..ll..
KO
r'-
;r 'it o ~
U\1ll
]0
0
)jJ 1)J
'0 r:1
~
11.10
+J of
~0 J
.rt
n
rLI
:<0
50
K~J
0
;jQ
'0 OF
'OJ ~
0
:nJ o ~ ~
11.\0
\
or
0 III
;j6O
~
~
.J.-J
~nJ
'Io
'0 < 1 Wjo Ii f "O\J 1\I\1lI 'K0
~I
.......,
lIIIr
=1
-
'<f ~J
rLI
;or
oj
Ill\J Kf rt w
~
LJjo ~
JIJ OF) ;j6O 'it
K ~
Kf JIJ
'r\!-
ollll
ttJ
of)
J\J
O~J
OrJ
rt
Id
Kf "'f
Kr
K
$J 7)l!
illJ 'Kr
;j6O r.jJ Kf
Wjo
Ill\J Ill\J ~
KI /11.1 ~
"0
It
~
Kf f~
~
'i1f 'OJ 7<.,0
oFJ j- or
rt '0 ;Kif
of'<
r1f
iOr
~
JIJ
;j6O
JIJ
cr
LJjo
;j6O
LJjo
50
~O
JIJ
;kJ
(jO ~
~o
willi
or f1 ~) ~J
T ur ;jQ
'S'"
~ o
o ~
-=<
~
rtr
0
0\
I
'1<1
D})
rtr
K ~
~ci
~
0\0
oF
$J
P =<
r\1
n-
JIJ
Kf ~
~
'i1f 11.1 ~
Kf ;KiD
~
OFJ or
olJ '0
~ o
~
r<::<
'00
';;(0
=<
11.1-
1)J 01 III
o\nJ
~
'f-\nJ
'0
0
~
]"0
...
'ill
v,
wi
"'
or
01111
T
K<'
I
.'
~
~
K~
~
~
~ o
-\-1
/Iaj
IllIIli
~
~
••
ll\.J
'r.4
UJj
mini
.......
~
"0
or
Uf
.
,&
~
~
'T" 0 ~
~
0
or
~
1"\1"<'\
'10'
or
or
~
rif1
0
0"0
.-J.-J
~
~
~
~
~
'KJ ~
ur Ii olJ
~
~
"'r
K
~
';;(0