Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
THE BROKER ONLINE, Amsterdam
…
4 pages
1 file
The paper is part of a multi-authored project on Mali and the Sahel. Algeria is well aware that any further uprising in Northern Mali might destabilize the south of the country, where many Malian Tuareg refugees live or have settled permanently. That is why Algeria’s growing pro-active attitude in the region is dictated by tactical circumstances and geopolitical interests. As a result, it seems then that a new diplomatic era is opening up for Algeria, imposed by various internal and external convergent factors and recent developments in neighbouring North African countries.
Technium Social Sciences Journal
This article aims to analyse the position of Algerian diplomacy with regard to the Libyan crisis and the attempts to resolve this fratricidal conflict, which has become an economic and security burden for Algeria. Where, the Libyan crisis, due to the proximity of this country to Algeria, has become a source of threats and protean (security) risks, a fortiori terrorism. It should be noted that Algeria's diplomatic approach is based on a "political solution" to the Libyan crisis, which consists of banning any form of foreign intervention, especially military. This approach has come up against the complexity of the Libyan reality and its regional and international ramifications. In this article, we address the following elements - the evolution of the Algerian diplomatic position towards the Libyan crisis since 2011; - the nature of the Algerian diplomatic preoccupation towards the Libyan crisis. We will also try to analyse the deeper issue of the balance between the mora...
Abstract Public diplomacy and soft power concepts have been largely in use particularly by developped countries in their international relations, political, economic, cultural and diplomatic activities. In Algeria, however, they are still unknown and remain confined to academic spheres and some political and diplomatic institutions. Thus, public diplomacy is broadly conceived and comprehended simplistically as any national or international activities carried out publicly by the authorities, decisions makers and diplomats. In addition, it is recognised that Algeria is suffering from deficits in its capacity to communicate with publics. Soft power, however, is even totally known compared to public diplomacy. Paradoxically, the concept is understood by its opposite meaning; hard power or military action. The latter is oftentimes privileged and ‘more popular’ than soft power or diplomatic manner. The fact is that Algerian armed revolution against French in 1950s is still in reminiscence and this may take time to soften some Algerians’s attitudes and opinions. So, having inherited revolutionary ideology (favouring military power), parts of the society and some of those in powers, are still reluctant to easily accept and adhere to peaceful solution, which advocates communication, negotiation and deliberation. Therefore, public diplomacy and soft power concepts alike require a clear and broad explanation within the social, cultural, historical and political context of Algeria. Despite these hurdles, Algerian diplomacy has been gaining positive diplomatic results in international arena. The last example, it is its leading role in negotiations for United Nations peace talks in Mali and still Algeria offers its mediation for a peaceful solution to the chaotic situation in Libya. What are the secrets of the Algerian diplomatic ‘success’, and how soft power and public diplomacy concepts are comprehended and implemented?. Who are the main actors that influence Algerian diplomacy? What is president’s role? How decisions are made, taken and undertaken? What arguments, values and principles are considered?. In my paper, I will attempt to present an overview of Algerian diplomatic history by highlighting basic principles and values that guided foreign policy and diplomatic activities. Refering to constitution, what is the institutional role empowered by the president?. How the ministry of foreign affairs exercises its activities?. Who are the other political and military institutions that contribute to decision making process in foreing affairs?. The second point is to explain how public diplomacy and soft power are perceived, conceived and implemented by those actors in charge of diplomacy and foreign affairs?. Then, how practically, Algerian diplomacy has acted in contributing to solve the conflict in Mali?. The answer requires presenting a background of the geopolitical situation and some economic, social and cultural facts about the Sahel region. Also, contacts will be made with diplomats and mediators about different approaches, tools and instruments implemented to solve the crisis in Mali. Also, I will synthesise key elements that contributed to the success of Algerian diplomacy in Mali mediation. What kind of instruments and arguments that diplomats have used to convince different belligerents?, what are key elements of soft power ‘exerted’ by mediators and negotiators? And finally what are the propects for public diplomacy and soft power for Algerian future diplomacy?. Dr Laeed Zaghlami
2017
The Sahel security issues in Africa and the Malian crisis in particular have brought the region to the center of the Algerian foreign policy concerns. Algiers has been an indispensable provider of stability in the African Sahel. In recent years, weak governances, political instability and fragile security have become common features of the Sahelian states. The large quantity of natural resources of the Sahel has paved a road for foreign intervention and increasing rivalry among the world economic powers across the region. In order to safeguard the long-term security in its backyard, in many times the Algerian leaderships have promoted state-building and dialogue as the best ways to lift states of the Sahel out of crisis. Neighboring countries like Mali are looking to Algiers to play an effective role in leading conflict management efforts in the region.
Stability: International Journal of Security & Development, London
— Since its independence, Algeria has always struggled for an international order that defends: the respect of sovereignty of States and their right to self-determination, non-interference in the internal affairs of States, the peaceful settlement of conflicts, non-interventionism, whether military or humanitarian. The present article is made with the aim of shedding light on the foreign policy of Algeria and its evolution in a context of regional upheavals. The analysis presented reflects only the author's point of view. This article focuses on the following axes: • The doctrinal principles of Algerian foreign policy and its historical context; • The Mediterranean dimension in the Algerian Foreign Policy such as: Algeria's relationship with the Maghreb and the European Union; • Algeria's prospects for the development of its foreign policy.
World Politics Review, 2021
Both the historically insular regime and the general population have shown signs of opening up to the outside world, which presents international actors with a rare opportunity to deepen ties with Algiers. Likely the most sensitive and complicated area for all parties involved will be navigating the tense political climate between the military-led state and the opposition.
The Journal of North African Studies, 2018
The strategic guidelines directing Algerian foreign policy are still dominated by normative principles inherited from the early years of the national independence war, which have underpinned the construction of the regime's legitimacy. This doctrinal position has been shaken up by new security threats coming from neighbouring countries. This article analyses the evolution of Algerian foreign policy since 2011, identifying the main constraints and obstacles that limit its ability to adapt to the new sub-regional context marked by the disintegration of the neighbouring states of Mali and Libya. Libya is in the midst of a massive security vacuum brought on by the absence of a central authority and a collapsing defence system. In Mali, in spite of the 2015 peace agreement designed to end the military and political crisis, the north is still facing high levels of violence and insecurity. This deteriorating regional security situation entails new challenges and dilemmas that are pushing Algeria to reconsider the normative foundations that have guided its foreign policy since independence, namely the principles of non-interference in the internal affairs of another state, respect for state sovereignty and support for anticolonial and revolutionary movements. Furthermore, these security concerns are also closely connected with Algeria's domestic stability in terms of both state and regime security. The article addresses the following questions: How do these intertwined internal and external factors affect Algerian foreign policy? What are the main constraints that impede the emergence of a new strategic orientation to better respond to the challenges coming from Libya and Mali?
Cartas Ecología Política, 2023
Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 2024
THIRTY-FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON: “SOCIAL AND NATURAL SCIENCES – GLOBAL CHALLENGE 2023” (ICSNS XXXI-2023), 2023
Επιστήμη και Κοινωνία: Επιθεώρηση Πολιτικής και Ηθικής Θεωρίας, 2015
Scientific Reports
Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geschiedenis/ The Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History, 2010
atti convegno su Orazio Borgianni, Roma Palazzo Barberini, ottobre 2020, 2022
Nabila Alya Mufidah, 2024
Taller de letras, 2023
Obesity Surgery, 1996
Pediatric Research, 1998
Biotechnology Letters
Soil Ecology Letters, 2023
European Journal of Pediatrics, 1995
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1993
2018 76th Device Research Conference (DRC), 2018