Dual-comb spectroscopy for high-temperature
reaction kinetics
NICOLAS H. PINKOWSKI,1* YIMING DING,1 CHRISTOPHER L. STRAND ,1* AND RONALD K. HANSON 1
1
High Temperature Gasdynamics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University
RAPHAEL HORVATH,2 MARKUS GEISER, 2
2
IRsweep AG, Laubisruetistr. 44, 8712 Staefa, Switzerland
*Corresponding author:
[email protected]
Received xxxxxx
Accepted for publication xxxxxx
Published xxxxxx
Abstract
In the current study, a quantum-cascade-laser-based dual-comb spectrometer (DCS) was
used to paint a detailed picture of a 1.0 ms high-temperature reaction between propyne and
oxygen. The DCS interfaced with a shock tube to provide pre-ignition conditions of 1225
K, 2.8 atm, and 2% p-C3H4/18% O2/Ar. The spectrometer consisted of two free-running,
non-stabilized frequency combs each emitting at 179 wavelengths between 1174 and 1233
cm-1. A free spectral range, 𝑓𝑟 , of 9.86 GHz and a difference in comb spacing, Δ𝑓𝑟 , of 5
MHz, enabled a theoretical time resolution of 0.2 µs but the data was time-integrated to 4
µs to improve SNR. The accuracy of the spectrometer was monitored using a suite of
independent laser diagnostics and good agreement observed. Key challenges remain in the
fitting of available high-temperature spectroscopic models to the observed spectra of a
post-ignition environment.
Keywords: propyne, dual-comb spectroscopy, reaction kinetics, time-resolved, laser absorption spectroscopy, shock tubes, high
temperature
1. Introduction
Energy systems involving high temperatures and fast
reactions rely on absorption spectroscopy for fundamental
research and field diagnostics. However, measurements at
extreme conditions are fundamentally challenging due to
short timescales and complex thermochemistry that is often
present.
For
such
environments,
high-bandwidth
measurement of a spectral surface (absorbance as a function
of wavenumber and time) could provide sufficient
information for speciation, thermometry, and knowledge of
quantum state populations in non-equilibrium environments.
However, many broadband measurement techniques, such as
Fourier Transform Infrared spectrometers or rapid-tuning
broad-scan external cavity quantum cascade lasers [1], are
mechanically limited to low time-resolutions. Advanced
broadband diagnostics being developed without such
mechanical limitations involve super-continuum and
frequency-comb absorption spectroscopy [2–9].
Two frequency combs can be combined to help interpret
the signal of multiple wavelengths simultaneously, a
technique called dual-comb spectroscopy (DCS). Notable
studies involving DCS include: the first dual-comb field
diagnostic monitoring greenhouse gases [2], dual-combs in a
rapid compression machine [8], and DCS used to study
protein dynamics [10].
It is of great interest to apply DCS to study hightemperature reaction kinetics. However, this application puts
stringent constraints on a spectrometer’s capabilities. At hightemperatures, reactions occur over short timescales and often
in vessels with short path lengths. Correspondingly, it is
important to have microsecond time-resolution and a high
power across all wavelengths (power-per-wavelength) to
ensure sufficient signal to noise in a dynamic environment
with emission and vibration. Furthermore, it is desirable for
measurements to be made in the mid-infrared between 3-20
µm with access to the prominent absorption features of
hydrocarbons, such as CH2 and CH3 stretching modes in the
3 µm region, –CH=CH2 bending modes near 11 µm, or CH
bending modes near 15 µm [11]. To the authors’ knowledge,
reaction kinetics using frequency-comb spectroscopy was
first studied by Fleisher et al. & Bjork et al. involving
measurements of a photolysis-induced reaction at 25 µs time
resolution [12,13]. These studies did not use DCS but used a
single frequency comb and diffraction grating to interpret the
signal. The use of two frequency combs, dual-comb
spectroscopy, has been applied to high-temperature, nonreacting conditions in a rapid compression machine by Draper
et al. at 704 µs time-resolution and also by Schroeder et al. in
the exhaust of a gas turbine at high temperatures and 10-60 s
time-resolution [4,8]. Draper et al. and Schroeder et al.
achieved exceptional spectral resolution with tens of
thousands of wavelengths in the near-IR. A worthy extension
of the work of Draper and Schroeder et al. would be to
establish similar techniques in the mid-IR with improved
time-resolution.
Efforts to extend DCS into the 3-20 µm region have
involved distributed feedback generation DFG [14], optical
parametric oscillators (OPO) [15–17], and quantum-cascadelaser (QCL) approaches [6,7,18–20]. Obtaining coherency
between two frequency combs is an enabling factor for DCS
and DFG approaches can achieve this readily. However, DFG
methods generally have limited power-per-wavelength, which
limits application in many environments [19]. Alternatively,
OPO-based combs can obtain a higher power-per-wavelength
while also providing access to the mid-infrared. However, a
disadvantage of OPO combs involves the fact that coherency
between separate combs is more challenging to obtain. For
this reason, dispersion was used when Fleisher et al. and Bjork
et al. first studied reaction kinetics with a mid-infrared OPO
comb [12,13]. An extension of the work of Fleisher and Bjork
et al. would involve the use of two coherent, mid-IR
frequency combs configured as a dual-comb spectrometer.
Prominently, a class of OPO combs operating in
degeneracy, known also as divide-by-two subharmonic
OPOs, have successfully demonstrated coherency and dualcomb operation [17,21,22]. The OPO-based DCS of
Muraviev et al. [17] offered remarkable spectral coverage
(3.1-5.5 µm with 350,000 spectral data points), although with
a minimum time-resolution of only 7 ms. While only a matter
of time, OPO-based DCS has yet to demonstrate both dualcomb and microsecond operation in the mid-infrared.
Advances in the field of quantum-cascade-laser (QCL)
frequency combs have led to the development of mid-IR,
solid-state spectrometers that have attracted considerable
attention in the recent literature [7,10,20,23–25]. In particular,
the recent advent of QCL frequency combs provides an
alternative to DFG and OPO combs when a high power-perwavelength and fast time resolution are needed [20,25]. QCL
combs can offer over 1 mW per wavelength and microsecond
time-resolution, with the tradeoff of having a larger comb
spacing (~0.3 cm-1) and less spectral range than alternative
systems. To date, these QCL-based systems have performed
well in proof-of-concept demonstrations, e.g. to observe
protein dynamics [10,20].
In this study, we demonstrate a mid-infrared QCL-based
dual-comb spectrometer (DCS) capable of microsecondresolved measurements of energetic gas phase reactions.
Specifically, an aggressive chemical reaction, propyne
oxidation, was studied using a pressure-driven shock tube
equipped with two QCL frequency combs and a suite of
independent validation diagnostics. This study details the
dual-comb spectrometer employed, provides a demonstrative
propyne oxidation measurement, and concludes with an
assessment of system accuracy.
2. Background
2.1. Laser systems
An overview of the experimental setup is provided in Fig. 1,
illustrating the placement of frequency combs and other validation
diagnostics on a shock tube with a bore of 14.13 cm. The shock tube
was used to generate the high-temperature conditions and was
described by Strand et al. [1] previously. The shock tube interfaced
with a dual-comb (QCL-based) spectrometer, and two additional
interband cascade lasers (ICL) to study water and propyne. A sidewall pressure transducer was also used to monitor the pressure
during the reaction.
Fig. 1. An illustration of a shock tube equipped with a QCL dualcomb spectrometer and supporting validation diagnostics. HgCdTe
(MCT) detectors, interband cascade lasers (ICLs), pressure
transducer, and a reaction zone are indicated.
2.1.1. Dual-comb spectrometer
The DCS developed for the current study relies on two
free-running QCL-based frequency combs (from IRsweep
AG), each spanning about 60 cm-1. The native emission power
of each comb was >500 mW resulting in >2 mW per comb
tooth on average. Each QCL comb was slightly detuned from
another to yield two different repetition frequencies, f1 and f2
that were both at approximately 0.3 cm-1 or 9.86 GHz. The
difference in repetition rates, ∆frep = f1 - f2, was typically
around 5 MHz. This slight difference resulted in the creation
of a set of beating frequencies between each detuned pair of
spectral lines. This set of beat-notes constitutes an additional
frequency comb in the radio-frequency (RF) domain. Unlike
the mid-infrared combs that generated the beat-notes, this RF
comb is at much slower frequencies and its intensity vs. time
can be measured on a detector.
The combs emitted at 179 different wavelengths from
1174 to 1233 cm-1 providing access to high-temperature
absorption features for alkynes and water in this region
[26,27]. FTIR measurements of the corresponding emission
from each comb are presented in Fig. 2. The narrow emission
of each comb tooth is below the 0.3 cm-1 spectral resolution of
the FTIR and this under-sampling manifests itself as the
broadened peaks seen in Fig 2. However, the FTIR
measurements in Fig. 2 very effectively illustrate the emission
range of the QCL’s and the spectral power distribution that
can be expected from the spectrometer.
Fig. 2. FTIR measurements of each frequency comb. While
emission of each comb line is well below the spectral resolution of
the FTIR (0.3 cm-1), these FTIR measurements provide a clear
picture of the wavenumber-dependent power distribution of the
system with high power near 1185 cm-1 and 1220 cm-1 and low
power near 1205 cm-1.
The emission from the pair of QCL combs was coaligned
and split to yield two combined beams. The first (reference)
beam was attenuated and focused onto a reference HgCdTe
(MCT) detector, while the second (sample) beam was
attenuated and transmitted through wedged, anti-reflectioncoated ZnSe windows in the shock tube. After traversing the
shock tube, this beam was directed through a long-pass filter
and focused on another MCT detector. The superimposed
wavelengths of light from the two frequency combs
heterodyned on each detector and generated a comb in the RF
domain spaced at ∆frep. The detectors had a bandwidth of 1
GHz and were digitally sampled at 2.0 GS/s to record a
sequence of interferograms spaced at a period of 1/∆frep (0.2
µs). The shortest achievable time resolution of this
configuration is determined by the period of a single
interferogram and was therefore 0.2 µs. However, the
interferograms were then averaged over a time-interval of 4
µs to improve signal-to-noise ratio. In the time domain, a
representative signal from the DCS is shown in Fig. 3, which
demonstrates a typical interferogram pattern observed.
Figure 4 presents the result of a Fourier transformation of
the time-domain data to assess the frequency content of the
DCS signal. As can be seen in Fig. 4, the slight detuning
between the two frequency combs manifests itself as an
additional frequency comb in the RF domain. The beating, or
heterodyning, between DCS comb teeth creates the multiheterodyne pattern in Fig. 4. The discrete and equally spaced
peaks confirm that the system is generating a successful multi-
heterodyne signal and provides insights about the QCL combs
that generated the pattern. Prominently, the RF frequency
comb in Fig. 4 has a similar shape as the power profiles from
the FTIR measurements presented in Fig. 2.
Fig. 3. A representative DCS signal in the time domain for multiple
periods (left) and for a single period (shown right) with a shared
ordinate axis. Good signal is observed for each period and SNR is
improved further through time-integration to 4 µs.
The power in each RF beat-note is proportional to the
product of the electric fields of the two contributing laser
modes. Consequently, changes to the intensities of the
measured beat-notes directly correlates to attenuation of light
in the optical domain. To calculate absorbance using the DCS
system, the attenuation at each optical wavelength was
calculated, adjusted by a pre-experimental background
measurement, and normalized by an unattenuated signal. The
absorbance of the mixture at each wavelength was then
determined using the Beer-Lambert relation.
Fig. 4. A representative RF, multi-heterodyne pattern of the dualcomb system generated by taking the Fourier transformer of timedomain data. The sharp set of beat-notes presented here indicates
effective detuning and operation of the of two QCL combs.
Notably, the spectral separation of the superimposed
laser lines contributing to an individual beat-note varied from
50 to 900 MHz; however, an average frequency for each
superimposed pair of comb teeth was used for absorbance.
Accordingly, the optical resolution of each emission line was
limited to 900 MHz (0.03 cm-1), and overall spectroscopic
sampling resolution governed by the comb spacing of 0.3 cm1
. To ensure quality measurements, the system was calibrated
before and after each experiment against the well-known
spectrum of polyethylene. Ultimately, while no active
wavelength stabilization method was used during an
experiment, a comparison of the pre- and post-shock
calibration indicated drift of < 100 kHz.
Fig. 5. DCS data from 1215 cm-1 to 1225 cm-1 of propyne oxidation (2% p-C3H4 T0 = 1225 K, P0 = 2.8 atm) illustrating the arrival
of the incident and reflected shock before time-zero. The broadband absorption feature of propyne is visible from 0 to 0.6 ms and
can be seen transforming into a finely featured spectrum (water) after 0.8 ms. The DCS data demonstrates good SNR during the
passage of each shock wave, occurrence of a combustion reaction, and temperature/pressure increase of roughly 2500 K/60x over
only 1 ms.
2.1.2. Supporting laser diagnostics
In addition to the DCS, two separate laser diagnostic
systems, shown in Fig. 1, were employed simultaneously to
monitor the reaction. A scanned-wavelength diagnostic for
water was used to measure a water absorption transition at
4029.5 cm-1 using a wavelength-tuned interband cascade laser
(ICL) with a scan repetition rate of 5 kHz [28,29]. Secondly,
a fixed-wavelength laser diagnostic for propyne detection was
used at 2999.55 cm-1 using an additional ICL. Each ICL was
coupled with a HgCdTe (MCT) detector that was sampled at 5
MHz.
2.2. Propyne Oxidation
Propyne oxidation was selected as the reaction of interest
due to a blended broadband absorption feature of propyne and
wealth of narrow absorption transitions of water between
1174 -1233 cm-1. The absorption feature of propyne is derived
from the P-branch of the second harmonic of propyne’s –CH
in-plane vibrational bending mode [11,26]. At high
temperatures, nearly the entire P-branch of the propyne
absorption feature is accessible using the DCS system. The
absorption features of water are derived from the P-branch of
an in-plane symmetric bending mode [11]. During oxidation,
the mixture’s spectrum evolved in time as the broadband
spectrum of propyne transformed into the finely featured
spectrum of water.
3. Experimental Results
3.1. Overview
Data from all diagnostics are presented in Fig. 5-7 for an
example shock tube experiment. The pressure-driven,
stainless steel shock tube shown in Fig. 1 was used to
propagate a shock wave at Mach 2.2 into a test gas mixture
with an initial molar composition of 2% p-C3H4/18% O2/80%
Ar, a temperature of 298 K, and a pressure of 75 Torr. Figure 5
presents a sample of the DCS data from this reaction where
the broadband propyne absorption feature can be seen at early
times and the finely featured spectrum of water observed after
0.75 ms. The full dataset of the DCS absorbance
measurements is presented in Fig. 6(b). The lowest pressure
and absorbance measurements in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6(a-b),
located before -75 µs, indicate this pre-shock region. Upon the
arrival of the first shock wave, there is a step change in
pressure and absorbance of the test gas, seen in Fig. 5 and Fig.
6(a-b) at -75 µs, as the mixture is heated and pressurized to
720 K and 0.7 atm. At this time, the tail of the propyne
absorption feature first appears in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6(b) near
1225-1230 cm-1 and the apex of the feature rests just beyond
the domain limit of 1233 cm-1.
After 75 µs, the reflected shock wave arrives (defining
time-zero) and provides another pressure increase that is
visible in Fig. 6(a). At time-zero, chemistry is assumed to be
momentarily frozen and the mixture condition changed to
1225 K and 2.8 atm. Also at time-zero, the system undergoes
a rapid redistribution of the state populations, which shifts the
crest of the propyne feature seen in Fig. 6(b) to approximately
1220 cm-1. Soon after, oxidative pyrolysis begins and propyne
is slowly consumed for the subsequent 0.75 ms. During the
pyrolysis process, propyne was observed on the separate
propyne-specific diagnostic and showed agreement to the
overall decomposition rate registered by the DCS, shown on
the left of Fig. 7.
Beer-Lambert system is discussed in detail in supporting
literature [31].
Minimize:
Fig. 6. DCS measurements of propyne oxidation with
time-zero conditions of 2% p-C3H4/18% O2 in Ar, 1225 K,
and 2.8 atm. All data are aligned in time and share the same
x-axis. (a) Measured and simulated thermodynamic
conditions for the reaction. (b) Dual-comb-measured
absorbance spectrum evolving in time at 4 µs time resolution
(See Visualization 1). Two regions with high SNR are
delineated in dashed white areas. All simulations shown in (a)
used the USC Mech II kinetic mechanism and assumed
constant volume [30].
After a residence time of approximately 0.75-0.9 ms,
exponential growth of the radical pool takes hold and the
mixture ignites. Formation of water during ignition was
observed by both the DCS and the scanned-wavelength water
diagnostic. In Fig. 6(b), water formation is represented by a
brush of fine absorption lines just before 0.9 ms. These
absorption features arise coincident with H2O formation
observed using the ancillary water diagnostic, which is shown
on the right of Fig. 7.
The current study also includes a video in order to
demonstrate the time evolution of the measured spectrum,
pressure, and water mole fraction. This video is attached in
the supplemental material as Visualization 1.
3.2. Speciation
Quantitative speciation measurements were performed
using the DCS and the supporting laser diagnostics and
compared to a kinetic model (USC Mech II [30]), all shown
in Fig. 7. For DCS measurement of propyne and water mole
fractions, a vectorized Beer-Lambert system was formulated
as presented in Eq. 1. The system included: W a weighting
parameter matrix, K a cross-section matrix (cm-1 atm-1), 𝒙 a
mole fraction vector, and 𝒃 (cm-1 atm-1) a vector of the
pressure- and path-length-normalized absorbance at each
DCS wavelength as a function of time. The formulation of the
‖𝑊(𝐾𝒙 − 𝒃)‖22
Eq. 1
The diagonal of the weighting matrix was set as the
wavenumber- and time-dependent SNR of the DCS system
(see Fig. A.1). The SNR of each DCS wavenumber was
defined as the absorbance at a given time divided by a
measurement of the standard deviation at each wavenumber.
The standard deviation at each DCS wavenumber was
calculated from a statistical analysis of the DCS noise, which
was determined by measuring the absorbance of a nonabsorbing medium. Propyne and water were the only species
included in the cross-section matrix, K. Expected intermediate
species that form in trace amounts, but potentially detectable
quantities, include: allene, acetylene, methane, ethylene, and
formaldehyde. Of these potentially interfering species, only
methane and acetylene absorb in this region, although
acetylene absorbs very weakly.
Temperature-dependent absorption cross-sections were
determined for propyne through a series of additional nonoxidative 2% p-C3H4/98% Ar experiments ranging from 1100
to 1400 K. Water cross-sections were collected from a series
of fuel-lean hydrogen oxidation experiments (2-4%H2/2-4%
O2 at 1670-2030 K) and methane-oxidation experiments
(4.5% CH4/9% O2/Ar near 2900 K) to generate water in the
post-ignition
environments[30].
These
independent
experiments provided the absorption cross-sections that were
not available through existing experimental or theoretical
databases. Cross-section correlations across all 179
wavelengths were assumed to have a linear temperature
dependence. Acetylene and methane cross-section
measurements were also collected due to their potential to
absorb and interfere in this spectral region. From the
additional cross-section measurements, acetylene was
undetectable, but methane’s cross-section was non-negligible.
Equation 1 was solved both with and without methane in order
to assess whether it was detectable as an intermediate.
Including methane in the absorption cross-section matrix did
not yield statistically significant methane measurements but
did contribute approximately 5% additional uncertainty to the
propyne mole fraction measurements between 0.5 and 1 ms.
This additional uncertainty was accounted for in the 95%
confidence interval included with the data in Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. DCS measurements of propyne oxidation with time-zero conditions of 2% p-C3H4/18% O2 in Ar, 1225 K, and 2.8 atm.
Speciation measurements at a 95% confidence interval and simulated results for propyne and water. All simulations used the
USC Mech II kinetic mechanism and assumed constant volume [30]. Agreement at a 95% confidence interval is observed
between the DCS and supporting laser measurements. While overall agreement exists between the DCS measurements and USC
Mech II, key differences are visible at early times and just after ignition.
Notably, all 179 wavelengths were used in the
optimization process. Each wavelength made a valuable
contribution to the final mole fraction solution, however, with
the specific contribution commensurate to the wavelength’s
SNR. By employing this weighted optimization procedure,
the mole fractions of propyne and water were found to be in
fair agreement with the validation diagnostics and USC Mech.
II (see Fig. 7), with fluctuations in the mole fraction of water
roughly correlating to the pressure shown in Fig. 6(a). In the
DCS-based mole fraction measurements at early times (0 to
0.2 ms), we observe a convex decay profile that appears
higher and at odds to the concave predictions of the model and
ancillary propyne diagnostic. This difference after time-zero
is still being investigated as to the source.
3.3. Uncertainty quantification
Uncertainty was propagated for the DCS and the
supporting laser diagnostics to assess whether the results
agree within a 95 % confidence interval. All uncertainties are
included with each measurement in Fig. 7. The singlewavelength propyne diagnostic uncertainty is presented in
light gray bars at 0.35 ms and 0.68 ms, the scannedwavelength water diagnostic uncertainty as light blue bars at
0.7 ms, 1 ms, and 1.4 ms, and the DCS propyne (black) and
DCS water (dark blue) uncertainty visible at all other times
where ± bars are indicated.
DCS uncertainty was largely governed by the hightemperature absorption cross-section measurements used for
speciation. These measurements were collected through the
non-oxygenated propyne experiments and the water-
generating experiments described previously. Linear
temperature-dependent cross-section correlations were
determined at each of the 179 wavelengths along with each
correlation’s uncertainty to a 95% confidence interval.
Equation 2 was used to compute the cross-section (𝜎)
uncertainty at wavelength 𝜆 (𝑢𝜆,𝜎,95% ) and involved: the
residual squared error for the linear fit at wavelength 𝜆
(𝑅𝑆𝑆𝜆 ), sample number (n), and the temperature for each
cross-section measurement (𝑇𝑖 ). This method for uncertainty
propagation was described previously in [31] and derived
from[32].
𝑢𝜆,𝜎,95% = 𝑡95% (𝑅𝑆𝑆𝜆 )
{
2
1
)
𝑇
(𝑇 − ∑𝑛
𝑖
𝑖=1
𝑛
1/2
1
+
2
𝑛
(∑𝑛𝑖=1 𝑇𝑖 )
𝑛
2
∑
𝑇
−
𝑖=1 𝑖
[
]}
𝑛
Eq. 2
Uncertainty associated with the pressure- and pathlength-normalized absorbance (𝑢𝑏 ) was estimated by
propagating error due to path length, pressure, and attenuated
and un-attenuated laser intensities through the Beer-Lambert
relation. Notably, the attenuated intensity was found to be the
dominant contributor. Equation 3 was then used in the
determination of the uncertainty in the mole fraction of
species i at time t during speciation.
𝑀
𝑁
2
𝑀
2
𝜕𝑥𝑖
𝜕𝑥𝑖
2
2 + ∑(
𝑢𝑖 (𝑡) = √∑ ∑ (
) 𝑢𝜎 𝑗,𝑘
) 𝑢𝑏,𝑗
𝜕𝜎𝑗,𝑘
𝜕𝑏𝑗
𝑗=1 𝑘=1
𝑗=1
Eq. 3
𝜕𝑥
𝜕𝑥
The terms ( 𝑖) , ( 𝑖 ) are the derivatives of the mole
𝜕𝜎
𝜕𝑏
fraction of species 𝑥𝑖 with respect to the cross-section
correlation, 𝜎, and pressure- and path-length-normalized
absorbance, b. Notably, the uncertainties in the final
measurements were calculated assuming the potential
presence of methane. In these calculations, methane was
added to the matrix K from Eq. 1 to assess how the
measurements could be affected with a third absorber present.
The propyne and water species time-histories were unaffected
by this addition, however, their corresponding uncertainties
were affected. The largest influence was to the propyne mole
fraction uncertainty, which increased by about 5 % in the 0.2
ms proceeding ignition. No statistically significant methane
was observed to form and therefore the results with no
methane are shown in Fig. 7 but with the larger uncertainties
included. Future studies may also consider numerically
perturbing the temperature profile used in the determination
of the temperature-dependent cross-sections. However, the
uncertainty here was largely dominated by the uncertainty in
the absorption cross-section measurements and the
absorbance. Therefore, adding these additional terms will
yield only minor contributions to the overall uncertainty
reported.
This method of uncertainty propagation was also used for
the fixed-wavelength propyne diagnostic presented as light
gray in Fig. 7. This diagnostic used only one wavelength,
rather than 179 for the DCS. Correspondingly, the uncertainty
is much larger for the single-wavelength diagnostic due to a
𝜕𝑥
very large sensitivity from the term ( 𝑖 ). This observation
𝜕𝑏
confirms the utility of using multiple wavelengths as a means
of decreasing this sensitivity and, therefore, the overall
uncertainty in mole fraction measurements. In contrast, for the
DCS diagnostic, improvements in the reference cross-sections
will yield a largest reduction in uncertainty.
Uncertainties associated to the scanned-wavelength
measurements were determined using the RSS of the Voigt fit
to the absorbance trace recorded and detailed in the literature
[29].
In consideration of the uncertainties presented, the DCS
and supporting diagnostic measurements of both propyne and
water agree within a 95 % confidence interval. However,
before 0.1 ms and immediately after ignition a subtle but
observable disagreement exists between the DCS and the
supporting diagnostics that is still under investigation.
4. Time resolution and spectral accuracy
4.2. Time resolution
Figure 8 (a-b) present wavenumber slices of the DCS
measurement at 100 µs and 4 µs time resolution, respectively,
to illustrate the DCS data as a function of the averaging time.
Low SNR regions between 1200-1210 cm-1 and beyond 1230
cm-1 exhibit high noise yet contain valuable data even at 4 µs
time resolution. The blended-spectrum of the P-branch of the
propyne can be seen very clearly at early times for both 100
µs and 4 µs cases. Likewise, the consumption of propyne and
the final spectrum of water can be made out from the last two
frames of Fig. 8 (a-b). We conclude that the 4 µs resolution
data are of sufficient quality to make out the spectrum and its
evolution. Although noise increases with shorter time
resolution, and there are regions with very low SNR, this data
demonstrates the opportunity to DCS to effectively capture
reaction kinetics.
Fig. 8. Forward-time-averaged slices of the DCS
measurements from the case study of propyne oxidation (2%
p-C3H4/18% O2 in Ar, 1225 K, and 2.8 atm) for (a) 100 µs and
(b) 4 µs time-resolution. Gray traces indicate the spectrum at
preceding 0.25 ms time-steps.
4.3. Spectral accuracy
Spectral accuracy of the spectrometer was tested both
using an independent laser diagnostic for propyne and two
available high-temperature spectroscopic models for water.
The spectrum of high-temperature propyne showed good
agreement to independent spectral measurements, confirming
the spectral accuracy of the system. However, an interesting
disagreement was found between the measured spectrum and
available spectroscopic models for high-temperature water
[27,33]. At this time, no high-temperature models exist for
propyne that can be used for comparison.
4.3.1. Independent spectral measurements | propyne
A rapidly-tunable external-cavity QCL was used to scan
over the same portion of the spectral region as the DCS. A full
description of the scanned QCL laser methodology is provided in the
literature [1]. Non-oxygenated mixtures of 2% p-C3H4/Ar were
used to compare each diagnostic. Experiments using the
scanned-QCL were limited to temperatures below 1130 K, where
propyne was thermally stable for the 2 ms scan time. A common
condition of 1120 K and 3 atm was tested for both systems
and the results are shown in Fig. 9. The DCS measurement in
Fig. 9 was time-averaged over the same 2 ms as the scan from
the scanned-QCL. Good agreement is visible between the
DCS and the QCL spectra with the only discrepancies in the
two measurements corresponding to low SNR regions of the
DCS. The scanned-QCL’s spectral resolution is limited to 0.3
cm-1, roughly equal to the DCS point spacing. Accordingly,
the scanned-QCL was only used on the broadband spectrum
of propyne and spectroscopic models used to investigate the
spectrum of water.
Fig. 9. A comparison of the high-temperature spectrum of pC3H4/Ar near 1120 K and 3 atm measured using two-independent
diagnostics: a scanned QCL laser (gray) [1] and the QCL DCS
system (blue). SNR is shown on right axis (green) and was
calculated using the DCS signal (blue) and standard deviation. Good
agreement is visible with discrepancies correlated to low SNR
regions.
4.3.2. Spectral modeling | water
Additional measurements were taken to study the
spectrum of water and compare against available hightemperature spectroscopic models. Hydrogen oxidation
experiments were used to generate a post-ignition condition
of 4% H2O, T=1700-1800 K, P = 3-4 atm, which was studied using
the DCS. Hydrogen oxidation provided a controlled method to
produce water that could be measured using the DCS and compared
to two spectroscopic models: the HITEMP model and a recent
model put forth by Polyansky et al. and part of the ExoMol database
[34,35]. Publically available fortran scripts, ExoCross, were used to
execute the ExoMol model in this study [36]. Conditions used for
the spectroscopic simulation relied on modeled predictions of the
post-ignition temperature using USC Mech II, the water mole
fraction measured by the supporting water diagnostic, and pressure
measured using a side-wall transducer. A resulting comparison
between the DCS measurement and HITEMP modeled spectrum of
high-temperature water is provided in Fig. 10. The DCS
measurements use the post-ignition spectrum of hydrogen oxidation
averaged from 400-600 μs. It is evident that the measured spectrum
under-samples the predicted spectrum and there is poor agreement
between the measured and simulated spectra. Even when
considering the under-sampling rate, the difference between the
modeled and measured spectrum cannot be reconciled at this time.
It is of great interest to the authors to fit high-temperature
spectroscopic models to spectra measured using the DCS. This is in
contrast to the method employed in the current study that involved
the use a library of measured spectra and absorption cross-sections
for speciation. While also very effective, an improved methodology
would rely upon fitting spectroscopic models to the DCS data for
reduced uncertainty in speciation and to potentially enable
thermometry. However, across several species that absorb in the
region (propyne, methane, and water), there is a lack of hightemperature spectroscopic data to compare to, or to found models
upon, in the 1200 cm-1 region. Many studies have begun to address
this absence of data already[1,26,35,37–43]. This discrepancy
suggests an opportunity for future research as measurements push to
shorter timescales and higher temperatures, expanding the utility of
models and DCS for use in high-temperature reaction kinetics.
Fig. 10. A comparison of the measured and modeled hightemperature spectrum of 4% H2O, T=1738 K, P = 3.14 atm that
resulted following hydrogen oxidation, with a path length of 14.13
cm [27,33,36]. No visible agreement is observed between the
measured and modeled spectra at this time. This observation
identifies an opportunity to explore an understudied hightemperature band for water while also better assessing the ability for
QCL-based dual combs to study very finely featured spectra.
5. Conclusion
A clear tradeoff exists in molecular DCS between
spectral and time resolution, with the former investigated
thoroughly. Despite the fewer comb teeth used in this study,
the mid-infrared dual-comb system demonstrated was capable
of resolving propyne oxidation kinetics at 4 µs time
resolution. The time resolution and quality of the multiheterodyne signal showed merit in the high-enthalpy test
environment despite having several regions with low SNR.
The DCS was validated against a suite of independent laser
diagnostics with statistically significant agreement
demonstrated between laser systems. The current study
presented speciation of propyne and water by comparing a
measured absorption surface to a library of experimentally
measured, high-temperature absorption cross-sections.
Agreement was also observed between the modeled and
measured mole fractions of propyne and water, although
slight discrepancies did exist at early times and just after
ignition, a phenomenon warranting further investigation.
While agreement was obtained between this DCS and a
supporting laser diagnostic to measure the broadband
spectrum of propyne, a notable disagreement exists between
our measured spectra of water and existing high-temperature
spectroscopic models. Therefore, whether QCL-based DCS
has the ability to measure the finely featured spectra of
molecules such as water, remains an open question. Towards
this end, future studies are needed to make additional
measurements of molecules such as water or methane with
finely featured spectra in this spectral region. It is also
important to make use of ever-improving high-temperature
spectroscopic models and cross-section databases, which are
also still quite underdeveloped at these temperatures and in
this region.
The case study shown here indicates that a clear
opportunity exists for DCS to greatly increase the information
content of the traditional laser diagnostics used in highenthalpy and reacting test environments. As mid-infrared
dual-comb spectroscopy emerges, the study of high-enthalpy
reacting environments offers a wide canvas of applications on
which DCS can make a lasting impact.
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
Funding. This material is based upon work supported by, or in
part by, the U. S. Army Research Laboratory and the U. S. Army
Research Office under contract/grant number W911NF-17-1-0420
and the Air Force Office of Scientific research, AFOSR Grant No.
FA9550-16-1-0195, with Dr. Chiping Li as contract monitor.
[14]
Acknowledgment. We acknowledge Wey-Wey Su, Adam
[15]
Susa, and Séan Cassady for their contributions to the project.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is reported for
this work.
[16]
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
Strand CL, Ding Y, Johnson SE, Hanson RK.
Measurement of the mid-infrared absorption spectra of
ethylene (C2H4) and other molecules at high temperatures
and pressures. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2019;222–
223:122–9. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2018.10.030.
Rieker GB, Giorgetta FR, Swann WC, Kofler J, Zolot AM,
Sinclair LC, et al. Frequency-comb-based remote sensing
of greenhouse gases over kilometer air paths. Optica
2014;1:290. doi:10.1364/OPTICA.1.000290.
Werblinski T, Fendt P, Zigan L, Will S. High-speed
combustion diagnostics in a rapid compression machine by
broadband supercontinuum absorption spectroscopy. Appl
Opt 2017;56:4443. doi:10.1364/ao.56.004443.
Schroeder PJ, Wright RJ, Coburn S, Sodergren B, Cossel
KC, Droste S, et al. Dual frequency comb laser absorption
spectroscopy in a 16 MW gas turbine exhaust. Proc
Combust Inst 2017;36:4565–73.
doi:10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.032.
Coburn S, Alden CB, Wright R, Cossel K, Baumann E,
Truong G-W, et al. Regional trace-gas source attribution
using a field-deployed dual frequency comb spectrometer.
Optica 2018;5:320. doi:10.1364/OPTICA.5.000320.
Coddington I, Newbury N, Swann W. Dual-comb
spectroscopy. Optica 2016;3:411–26.
Picqué N, Hänsch TW. Frequency comb spectroscopy. Nat
Photonics 2019;13:146–57. doi:10.1038/s41566-0180347-5.
Draper AD, Cole RK, Makowiecki AS, Mohr J,
Zdanawicz A, Marchese A, et al. Broadband Dual
Frequency Comb Spectroscopy in a Rapid Compression
Machine. Opt Express 2018;27:10814–25.
Sanders ST. Wavelength-agile fiber laser using groupvelocity dispersion of pulsed super-continua and
application to broadband absorption spectroscopy. Appl
Phys B Lasers Opt 2002;75:799–802. doi:10.1007/s00340-
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
002-1044-z.
Klocke JL, Mangold M, Allmendinger P, Hugi A, Geiser
M, Jouy P, et al. Single-shot submicrosecond mid-infrared
spectroscopy on protein reactions with quantum cascade
laser frequency combs. Anal Chem
2018:acs.analchem.8b02531.
doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02531.
Shimanouchi T. Molecular Vibrational Frequencies:
Consolidated Vol. I 1972:1–161.
Fleisher AJ, Bjork BJ, Bui TQ, Cossel KC, Okumura M,
Ye J. Mid-infrared time-resolved frequency comb
spectroscopy of transient free radicals. J Phys Chem Lett
2014;5:2241–6. doi:10.1021/jz5008559.
Bjork BJ, Bui TQ, Heckl OH, Changala PB, Spaun B, Heu
P, et al. Direct frequency comb measurements of OD+CO-> DOCO kinetics. Science (80- ) 2016;354:444–8.
doi:10.7910/DVN/BH9UXW.SUPPLEMENTARY.
Ycas G, Giorgetta FR, Baumann E, Coddington I, Herman
D, Diddams SA, et al. High-coherence mid-infrared dualcomb spectroscopy spanning 2.6 to 5.2 μm. Nat Photonics
2018;12:1–7. doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0114-7.
Iwakuni K, Porat G, Bui TQ, Bjork BJ, Schoun SB, Heckl
OH, et al. Phase-stabilized 100 mW frequency comb near
10 μm. Appl Phys B Lasers Opt 2018;124:1–7.
doi:10.1007/s00340-018-6996-8.
Yu M, Okawachi Y, Griffith AG, Picqué N, Lipson M,
Gaeta AL. Silicon-chip-based mid-infrared dual-comb
spectroscopy. Nat Commun 2018;9:6–11.
doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04350-1.
Muraviev A V., Smolski VO, Loparo ZE, Vodopyanov
KL. Massively parallel sensing of trace molecules and
their isotopologues with broadband subharmonic midinfrared frequency combs. Nat Photonics 2018;12:209–14.
doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0135-2.
Villares G, Hugi A, Blaser S, Faist J. Dual-comb
spectroscopy based on quantum-cascade-laser frequency
combs. Nat Commun 2014;5:1–3.
doi:10.1038/ncomms6192.
Schliesser A, Picqué N, Hänsch TW. Mid-infrared
frequency combs. Nat Photonics 2012;6:440–9.
doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012.142.
Hugi A, Villares G, Blaser S, Liu HC, Faist J. Midinfrared frequency comb based on a quantum cascade
laser. Nature 2012;492:229–33. doi:10.1038/nature11620.
Marandi A, Leindecker NC, Pervak V, Byer RL,
Vodopyanov KL. Coherence properties of a broadband
femtosecond mid-IR optical parametric oscillator
operating at degeneracy. Opt Express 2012;20:7255.
doi:10.1364/oe.20.007255.
Leindecker N, Marandi A, Byer RL, Vodopyanov KL.
Broadband degenerate OPO for mid-infrared frequency
comb generation. Opt Express 2011;19:6296.
doi:10.1364/oe.19.006296.
Villares G, Faist J. Quantum cascade laser combs: effects
of modulation and dispersion. Opt Express 2015;23:1651.
doi:10.1364/OE.23.001651.
Faist J, Villares G, Scalari G, Rösch M, Bonzon C, Hugi
A, et al. Quantum Cascade Laser Frequency Combs.
Nanophotonics 2016;5:272–91. doi:10.1515/nanoph-20160015.
Villares G, Hugi A, Blaser S, Faist J. Dual-comb
spectroscopy based on quantum-cascade-laser frequency
combs. Nat Commun 2014;5:1–3.
doi:10.1038/ncomms6192.
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
Es-Sebbar E, Jolly A, Benilan Y, Farooq A. Quantitative
mid-infrared spectra of allene and propyne from room to
high temperatures. J Mol Spectrosc 2014;305:10–6.
doi:10.1016/j.jms.2014.09.004.
Polyansky OL, Kyuberis AA, Zobov NF, Tennyson J,
Yurchenko SN, Lodi L. ExoMol molecular line lists XXX:
a complete high-accuracy line list for water. Mon Not R
Astron Soc 2018;480:2597–608.
doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1877.
Goldenstein CS, Jeffries JB, Hanson RK. Diode laser
measurements of linestrength and temperature-dependent
lineshape parameters of H2O-, CO2-, and N2-perturbed
H2O transitions near 2474 and 2482nm. J Quant Spectrosc
Radiat Transf 2013;130:100–11.
doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.06.008.
Ferris AM, Streicher JW, Susa AJ, Davidson DF, Hanson
RK. A comparative laser absorption and gas
chromatography study of low-temperature n-heptane
oxidation intermediates. Proc Combust Inst 2019;37:249–
57. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.018.
Wang H, You X, Joshi A. High-temperature Combustion
Reaction Model of H2/CO/C1-C4 Compounds 2007.
http://ignis.usc.edu/USC_Mech_II.htm (accessed April 2,
2019).
Pinkowski NH, Ding Y, Johnson SE, Wang Y, Parise TC,
Davidson DF, et al. A multi-wavelength speciation
framework for high-temperature hydrocarbon pyrolysis. J
Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2019;225.
doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2018.12.038.
Coleman H, Steele G. Experimentation, validation, and
uncertainty analysis for engineers. John Wiley and Sons
Inc; 2009.
Goldenstein CS, Miller VA, Mitchell Spearrin R, Strand
CL. SpectraPlot.com: Integrated spectroscopic modeling
of atomic and molecular gases. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat
Transf 2017;200:249–57. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.06.007.
Rothman LS, Gordon IE, Barber RJ, Dothe H, Gamache
RR, Goldman A, et al. HITEMP, the high-temperature
molecular spectroscopic database. J Quant Spectrosc
Radiat Transf 2010;111:2139–50.
doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.05.001.
Polyansky OL, Kyuberis AA, Zobov NF, Tennyson J,
Yurchenko SN, Lodi L. ExoMol molecular line lists XXX:
A complete high-accuracy line list for water. Mon Not R
Astron Soc 2018;480:1–12. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1877.
Yurchenko SN, Al-Refaie A, Tennyson J. ExoCross: a
general program for generating spectra from molecular
line lists 2018. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732531.
Ding Y, Strand CL, Hanson RK. High-temperature midinfrared absorption spectra of methanol (CH3OH) and
ethanol (C2H5OH) between 930 and 1170 cm-1. J Quant
Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2018;224:396–402.
doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2018.11.034.
Almodovar CA, Su W-W, Strand CL, Sur R, Hanson RK.
High-pressure, high-temperature optical cell for midinfrared spectroscopy. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf
2019. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.04.014.
Coustenis A, Boudon V, Campargue A, Georges R,
Tyuterev VG. Exo-Planetary high-Temperature
Hydrocarbons by Emission and Absorption Spectroscopy
(the e-PYTHEAS project). Eur Planet Sci Congr
2017;11:EPSC2017-719–1, 2017.
Rey M, Delahaye T, Nikitin A V., Tyuterev VG. First
theoretical global line lists of ethylene ( 12 C 2 H 4 )
[41]
[42]
[43]
spectra for the temperature range 50−700 K in the farinfrared for quantification of absorption and emission in
planetary atmospheres . Astron Astrophys 2016;594:A47.
doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629004.
Melin ST, Sanders ST. Gas cell based on optical
contacting for fundamental spectroscopy studies with
initial reference absorption spectrum of H2O vapor at
1723 K and 0.0235 bar. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf
2016;180:184–91. doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.04.009.
Schwarm KK, Dinh HQ, Goldenstein CS, Pineda DI,
Spearrin RM. High-pressure and high-temperature gas cell
for absorption spectroscopy studies at wavelengths up to 8
µm. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 2019;227:145–51.
doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.01.029.
Alrefae M, Es-Sebbar ET, Farooq A. Absorption crosssection measurements of methane, ethane, ethylene and
methanol at high temperatures. J Mol Spectrosc
2014;303:8–14. doi:10.1016/j.jms.2014.06.007.
Appendix A
Figure A.1 presents the wavenumber- and time-dependent SNR of
the system during the propyne oxidization reaction. These SNR
values were used in the formulation of the diagonal weighting matrix
used in the speciation calculations.
Fig. A.1. SNR from a single-shot measurement of propyne
oxidation with time-zero conditions of 2% pC3H4/18% O2 in Ar,
1225 K, and 2.8 atm. SNR is shown using the color bar on the right.