Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2012, Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology
…
6 pages
1 file
Orthodontic therapy apart from its benefits also has potential risks and limitations in terms of tissue damage. Fortunately, in orthodontics, risks are minimal and infrequent. However, all potential risks and limitations should be considered and addressed when making the decision to undergo orthodontic treatment. Orthodontic treatment carries with it the risk of various types of soft and hard tissue damages (e.g. decalcification of enamel, lacerations, ulcerations, temporomandibular joint disorders, etc.), apart from treatment failure in itself. If correcting a malocclusion is to be of benefit, the advantages offered should outweigh any possible damage. All preventive procedures should be considered during and after orthodontic treatment to restore the normal health of soft and hard tissues. Hence, the orthodontist should be vigilant and prudent enough in assessing and monitoring every aspect of these tissues at any given stage and time in order to achieve a healthy and successful final result.
The Open Dentistry Journal, 2015
In orthodontic treatment, teeth are moved in to new positions and relationships and the soft tissue and underlying bone are altered to accommodate changes in esthetics and function. Function is more important than esthetics. The speciality of orthodontics has in addition to its benefits, complications as well as risks associated with its procedures. However the benefits outweigh the risks & complications in most of the treatment cases. Few of the unwanted side effects associated with treatment are tooth discolorations, enamel decalcification, periodontal complications like open gingival embrasures, root resorption, allergic reactions to nickel & chromium as well as treatment failure in the form of relapse.
South European Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research
Introduction: Orthodontic treatment is a complex medical intervention carried out over an extended period. During this time, risks may turn into complications. It is necessary to identify the risks that are associated with the orthodontic intervention to be applied, as there are numerous complications possibly linked to that treatment. The occurrence of these complications depends on the orthodontic technique, medical knowledge in this field, patient's general and oral health, and oral hygiene habits. These must be considered even from the start because it might influence the treatment objectives, phases, and goals. Aim: of this study is to present a contemporary attitude of the main risks and complications linked to orthodontic interventions in clinical practice. Materials and methods: Classification presented by Graber et al. in publication, "Risk management in orthodontics: expert's guide to malpractice," is used as a starting point for the development of this review. A complex search was performed (Pubmed, Google scholar, etc.), with the restriction upon of publication date (beginning with 2004) to find relevant current studies. Search keywords were combinations of words: complication, orthodontic treatment, risks, side effects. Concluding remarks: According to contemporary literature, there are a lot of conditions to which orthodontic treatment can be linked There is a medico-legal obligation to inform our patients about side effects of any medical intervention what will be undertaken.
Polish Journal of Public Health, 2014
Orthodontic treatment aims at restoring correct occlusion and chewing function and improving the aesthetics of the dentition and facial esthetics of the patient. During treatment complications may occur. Most frequently observed complications have been described in the paper. There role of the orthodontist in the therapeutic process and the principles on which doctor- patient cooperation should be based in order to achieve a therapeutic success have been presented. Particular emphasis has been put to the importance of prevention of dental caries and periodontal diseases in orthodontic patients.
International Journal of Medical Dentistry, 2011
The aim of the study was to establish the frequency of some minor oral surgery performed on both teeth and on the soft tissues, before any orthodontic treatment. The sample group included 587 patients (240 boys and 347 girls), divided into 3 categories. The data base was created wtih patient records, the statistical analyses being performed with the SPSS 17.0 software for Windows. The frequency of malocclusions with minor oral surgery pretreatment orthodontics was of 24%, out of which the surgical interventions on teeth represented 85.41% (serial extractions – 21.87%, orthodontic extractions – 41.66%, enucleation of third molars – 18.75%, discovery of impacted teeth – 2.08% and teeth enucleation – 1.04%) and the surgical interventions on the soft tissues represented 14.59% (labial frenectomy: 12.60%, lingual frenectomy: 1.04% and discovery of pericoronal tissues: 1.04%) The minor oral surgery pretreatment orthodontics upon both teeth and soft tissues are not quite frequent, yet they are necessary for a partial preparation of the patient for orthodontic therapy
Indonesian Journal of Dental Medicine, 2022
Background: Malocclusion is one of the main problems of oral and dental health, ranked third after caries and periodontal diseases. In Asian population, the percentage of class II and III Angle malocclusion is 21.42% and 5.76% respectively. Thus, orthodontic treatment is still needed by the people. However, not every patient knows the potential risks that orthodontic treatment, and whether the treatment will bring them benefits they want to achieve. Purpose: this study aimed to describe benefits and risks of orthodontic treatment on the patient and operator through scooping review. Review(s): The search of literatures show that orthodontic treatment increases patient's oral health related quality of life, reducing the risk of traumatic dental injuries in children with large overjet, and reducing the incident of muscle tenderness, and myofascial pain. However, orthodontic treatment poses the risk of damage to the teeth, oral and mucosal pain, speech problems, allergic reactions, and orthodontics relapse. Conclusion: Orthodontic treatment can provide benefits to patients' oral health related quality of life, as well as reducing the incidence of temporomandibular disorder and traumatic dental injuries in children with large overjet. But these benefits must outweigh the risks that can occur in the patient such as teeth damage, oral and mucosal pain, speech problems, allergic reactions, and the probability of relapse must also be minimized.
IOSR Journals , 2019
Background: The assessment of the patient's facial soft tissue is very important for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. To date, there have been few studies assessing changes in facial esthetics through photography, so we aimed to compare facial soft tissue attractiveness before and after orthodontic treatment through photographic analysis and to find out whether this new analysis is applicable in clinical practice. Subjects and Methods: Pre-and post-treatment photographs for 60patients were divided into three groups according to Angle's classification: Groups I, II, and III comprised patients with Angle's class I, II, and III malocclusions, respectively. Photographs were printed on A4 size paper, and tracings were made using thirteen soft tissue landmarks on profile and frontal photographs using tracing paper. The comparisons between pre-and post-treatment were made using a paired t-test. Results: For class I, there were significant changes in 4measurements: lower facial heightSn-Me,the angle of medium facial thirdN-Trg-Sn, the angle of facial inferior thirdSn-Trg-Me and angle of facial convexity G-Sn-Pog). The significant changes for fourmeasurements were convergent. For class II, there were significant changes in 2 measurements: angles of total facial convexity G-Prn-Pog and Nasomental angle N-Prn/N-Pog). G-Prn-Pogangle was more significant than N-Prn/N-Pog angle. For group III, there was no difference between pre-and post-treatment facial photographic analysis. Conclusion: There were significant changes in facial soft tissue esthetics after orthodontic treatment for class I and II malocclusion cases and we cannot rely on photographs for evaluating of orthodontic treatment.
2013
In the present context of the public health directions, considering WHO main objective, that „all people of the world could reach the highest possible health level”, in medicine, the accent is put on prevention. In spite of the important progresses achieved in orthodontics field, the treatment still remains a symptomatic one. In this context, we must ask ourselves what are the prevention theoretical and practical coordinates in orthodontics, which measures are available or could be elaborated for preventing the malocclusions development. From the clinical point of view, the most important element of the new perspective is that most of the cases of anomalies which in the present are cured by orthodontics are induced by functional and environmental factors and they can theoretically be prevented. Thus, the identification, control and guidance of the environmental factors which adjust the growing of the maxillaries and of the other cranio-facial structures would be the main target of a...
South European journal of orthodontics and dentofacial research, 2017
the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
IOSR Journals , 2019
Facial soft tissue plays an important role in facial esthetics. Facial esthetics is an important goal of treatment for contemporary orthodontics and it is one of the patient's main reasons for seeking orthodontic treatment. Thus, the assessment of the patient's facial soft tissue is very important for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. The appearance of the face is influenced by age, sex, race, and ethnicity, and the orthodontist is frequently questioned about facial changes after treatment. Thus, it is recognized by most orthodontists that success of orthodontic treatment is closely related to the improvement of the soft tissue profile. Analyzing the human face is a science and an art, using both aesthetic and anthropologic tools. Different strategies have been utilized to assess facial characteristics, like anthropometry, photogrammetry, and cephalometry. Many studies were created focusing on both numerical and subjective facial analysis, planning to set up reference values for facial photographic measurements and to confirm esthetical tendencies of the studied populations. Some authors assessed esthetics by clinical examination and measurements directly on the face. Other studies used computerized methods.
INTRODUCTION
Malalignment, crowding, spacing and proclination of teeth have been perennial esthetic problems since ages. Orthodontic treatment has thus become an integral part of the esthetic dentistry in the quest for a perfect smile. Apart from esthetics it also helps some patients by significantly improving mastication, speech, appearance, overall dental health, comfort and self-esteem. However, orthodontic appliances at times can cause harm to the related hard and soft tissues during and after treatment if the orthodontist is not vigilant. 1 This potential risk need to be identified early and managed appropriately to avoid such adverse problems. Such damage to the soft and hard tissues that are expressed clinically either intra and/or extra orally are called orthodontic scars.
Orthodontic scars may be present during and after treatment and are seldom severe to offset the advantages of treatment. Most of them are reversible damages and are transient in nature on soft tissues. However, the hard tissue damage can be irreversible, resulting in further treatment following the completion of orthodontic therapy as seen in the case of enamel decalcification. Hence, it is imperative 10.5005/jp-journals-10011-1299 that the patient should be addressed about such possibilities prior to orthodontic treatment. 2 Orthodontic scars can be broadly classified as follows:
LESIONS OF ENAMEL Enamel Decalcification/White Spot Lesions
White spot lesions around orthodontic attachments ( Fig. 1) is one the most common problem during and after fixed orthodontic treatment. 3 Plaque accumulation around the appliance components and bonding materials results in subsequent production of acid by the bacterial plaque resulting in demineralization and alteration in the appearance of the enamel surface. Early lesions appear as opaque, white spots 4 that may progress to caries if demineralization continues without intervention with preventive measures, such as fluoride application and other oral hygiene maintenance protocols. Clinically, they may be clinically detected as early as 1 to 2 months into treatment and their prevalence 5 among orthodontic patients ranges from 2 to 96%. The labiogingival area of the central and lateral incisors is the most common site for the white spot lesions while the maxillary posterior segments are the least common sites for their formation. 10 Their incidence is found to be more among male patients due to poorer oral hygiene maintenance than females. 5,6 The most important means of preventing demineralization is to ensure that the patient's maintain a high standard of oral hygiene throughout treatment. Fluoride is a wellestablished anticariogenic agent. Topical fluoride applications like 0.05% sodium fluoride, 1.2% acidulated phosphate fluoride mouth rinse (weekly), 0.4% stannous fluoride gel and fluoride varnish can be used to maintain such high standards. [7][8][9] For noncompliant patients, fluoridecontaining cements/bonding agents 10 and fluoride-releasing elastomeric ligatures 11 can be used for the same.
Figure 1
Post-debonding photograph showing areas of enamel decalcification of anterior teeth and enamel fracture of upper left incisal edge Gingival inflammation and enlargement seen between upper right canine and premolar area Orthodontic Scars
Physical Damages on Enamel (Enamel Wear/ Enamel Fractures)
Enamel damage most commonly occurs during debonding of orthodontic brackets. It is more common during debonding of ceramic brackets. The frequently affected areas are-incisal edges of the upper anterior teeth, 12 buccal cusps of upper posterior teeth and upper canine tips during debonding. Most commonly, careless use of an orthodontic band seater or band remover or debonding pliers results in enamel fracture (Fig. 1). Care is required especially when large restorations (composite build-up) are present, since these can result in fracture of unsupported cusps and incisal edges. Debonding can also result in enamel cracks that provide stagnation areas for the development of caries. 13 Zachrisson found that the prevalence of pronounced cracks in relation to the total number of cracks was 6% for debonded/banded teeth and 4% for untreated teeth. However, there were appreciably more cracks with chemically bonded ceramic brackets. 14 Peeling off stroke at the bracket-resin interface is the advocated method of removing brackets and residual bonding agents so as to minimize the risk of enamel fracture. Appropriate dietary advice should be given to minimize tooth substance loss. Carbonated beverages and pure citrus fruit juices are the most common causes of erosion and should be avoided in patients with fixed appliances. 15
PERIODONTAL TISSUES
Gingivitis/Gingival Enlargement
Gingival inflammation is the first and foremost immediate clinical tissue response that can be appreciated in almost all orthodontic patients (Fig. 2). It is transient and does not lead to any further complications, such as loss of gingival attachment, etc. The interproximal areas are usually more affected than the facial areas and posterior teeth more than anterior teeth. Gingival hyperplasia/enlargement is generally observed around orthodontic bands, leading to pseudopocketing and giving the illusion of attachment loss (Fig. 2); however, even this condition is transient in nature and usually resolves within weeks of debanding. [16][17][18][19] Adult patients usually are at higher risk of periodontal problems.
Figure 2
Light orthodontics forces are recommended for adult orthodontics. Utmost care should be taken particularly in patients with systemic diseases, such as epilepsy as they may be on phenytoin that causes gingival hyperplasia. 20
Gingival Recession
Alveolar bone loss and gingival recession in adult orthodontic patients is more common than in normal individuals 21 (Fig. 3). Banding induces more gingival inflammation than bonding with composite resins, since they are more plaque retentive and their margins are often placed subgingivally. Gingival recession and loss of alveolar bone have been reported as a result of teeth moving in the presence of inflammation. 22
Figure 3
Gingival recession on labial aspect of lower left central incisor Dark triangle between the central incisors
JIAOMR
Dark Triangles
Dark triangles may be seen as an unesthetic open gingival embrasure usually between incisors (Fig. 4) during the course of orthodontic treatment due to loss of gingival attachment as a result of periodontal disease or while correcting rotated or crowded anterior teeth. 23 Thus, care should be taken to avoid any attachment loss. If such unesthetic areas are observed, they can be treated by removing enamel at the contact point so that the teeth can be moved closer to minimize the space between them. However, care should be taken not to distort the proportional relationships of the teeth to each other in terms of their connector heights. Both, actual and potential black triangles should be noted during examination and the patient should be informed about reshaping the teeth later to minimize the esthetic problem.
Figure 4
SOFT TISSUE
Intraoral and extraoral soft tissue damage may be discussed under the following headings:
Direct Damage caused by Removable and/or Fixed Appliance Components
Removable Appliances
Retainers given after completion of orthodontic treatment form the bulk of removable appliances. Occasionally the Hawley's retainer may also be used to correct minor anterior corrections, such as mild spacing or single tooth rotations, crossbite, etc. The acrylic component and wires (retentive clasps, springs, canine retractors, etc.) at times may cause tissue impingement due to sharp edges. Though rare, cases of allergy and toxicity due to the unpolymerzed material of acrylic resin have also been reported. 24 To avoid such problems patients should be recalled after 2 weeks to round off any sharp edges or impingements.
Fixed Appliance and Its Components
Archwire, Brackets, Bands, Transpalatal Arch
Lacerations and ulcerations of the gingiva and oral mucosa occurs often during the initial phase of treatment-insertion of bands, brackets, wires and other auxiliaries (Fig. 5). Keratinization of tissues takes about 2 weeks. Use of dental wax over the brackets and rubber tubing of unsupported wires help reduce pain and discomfort due to trauma caused during this phase. 2
Figure 5
Ulceration of lip mucosa due to rubbing against lower rightcanine bracket
Headgear
Headgear appliance can cause injury if it is displaced either during sleep or rough play. Most commonly facial skin damage is a result of headgear strap. However, risk of damage and infection of the eye due to headgear have been reproted. 25 Samuels and Jones 26 classified the types of headgear injuries based of percentage occurrences: 1. Accidental disengagement of head strap while playing (27%) 2. Incorrect handling (27%) 3. Disengagement by another child (19%) 4. Disengagement while asleep (27%)
To reduce the risk of injury, headgears now come with a variety of safety features, which prevent them from causing damage to the face or the eyes. The use of safety bows, rigid necks straps and snap release products are mandatory to prevent the bow from disengaging from the molar tubes. Patients should be given both verbal and written safety instructions after fitting the headgear and advised not to wear the appliance while playing outdoor sports.
Loops, Utility Arches
These are archwires that are often used during orthodontic treatment for space closure, space maintenance or intrusion. Utmost care must be taken during their fabrication as they extend into the vestibular area, which may cause tissue impingement, ulcerations and other types of tissue damage (Fig. 6). Even minor amounts of continuous tissue impingement, if disregarded, may lead to more serious problems like ulceration or tissue hyperplasia around the loop. In extreme situations, the loop may become completely embedded in the hyperplastic tissue requiring surgical excision for removal. Thus, careful fabrication and monitoring of such wire components are essential to avoid such problems.
Figure 6
Impingement of T-loop on the buccal mucosa showing a T-shaped scar
Indirect Damage by Allergic Reactions
Nickel Allergy
Nickel hypersensitivity affects three in 10 of the general population. Nickel content is found in orthodontic wires, bands, brackets and headgears. 27 However, Intraoral signs and symptoms of nickel hypersensitivity are rare because the concentrations of nickel required to provoke a reaction in the mouth are higher than those needed on the skin as in the case of jewellery and ear piercing. Intraoral signs are highly variable and difficult to diagnose. These include loss of taste or metallic taste, numbness, burning sensation, soreness at the side of the tongue, angular cheilitis ( Fig. 7) and erythematous areas or severe gingivitis in the absence of plaque. 28 Since such signs and symptoms are difficult to identify, nickel allergy in response to orthodontic appliances may be underdiagnosed.
Figure 7
Nickel allergy Latex allergy of the tongue implantation makes them comfortable for the patients. However, potential problems and soft tissue complications are common.The following type of complications can occur with miniscrews:
Latex Allergy
Latex sensitivity may occur in response to contact with latex gloves, elastomeric ligatures or intra-and extraoral elastics. The commonest sites affected are the gingivae and tongue, (Fig. 8) but the perioral region may also be affected. 29 In latex-sensitive patients, steel ligatures or self-ligating brackets may be used instead of the conventional straight wire brackets and elastic modules and chains. 2,27
Figure 8
Soft Tissue Complications related to Implants
The introduction of microimplants to orthodontics as a skeletal anchorage option has led to their use in critical anchorage situations. Their simple design and ease in Impingements and Trauma to Soft Tissue Overlying the Implant Implant head being sharp may cause soft tissue damage to the buccal mucosa and/or attached gingiva related to the confined area. Care should be taken by during the implant Orthodontic Scars JIAOMR placement for its own stability as well as use of auxiliaries with its support, to avoid trauma and subsequent ulceration (Fig. 9). 30
Figure 9
Implant showing impingement of auxillary wire running from the implant to the second molar
Peri-implantitis
Peri-implantitis (inflammation of the gingiva around the implant) is as a result of improper oral hygiene maintenance. Patients should be counseled to maintain high level of oral hygiene throughout treatment.
Screw Fracture during Removal
Applying lateral forces during implant removal can cause fracture. It is important not to wiggle the screwdriver when removing it from the screw head. It is rare if taken out straight. If the micro-implant is left for a very long time, this also could lead to fracture on removal as a result of partial or full osseointegration.
Implant failure (mobility/fracture) can also occur if the screw is too narrow or the neck area is not strong enough to withstand the stress of removal. 31 The solution is to choose a conical screw with a solid neck and a diameter appropriate to the quality of bone.
SUMMARY
Most orthodontic scars are transient and self-correcting in nature. One exception to this rule strongly, is enamel decalcification and fractures, which require post-treatment rehabilitation. However, during the course of treatment if these scars are unobserved or untreated, they may cause complications in the form of infections resulting in pain and discomfort. Patient's oral hygiene maintenance and orthodontist keen observation during recall/review visits is the key to minimize the chances of such scars.