Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Renal Biopsy Training Using a Simulator

1991, American Journal of Nephrology

© 1991 S. Karger AG, Basel 0250-8095/91/0111-007652.75/0 Am J Nephrol 1991;11:76-77 Renal Biopsy Training Using a Simulator Mohamed Mohamed, David J. Leehey, Ramesh Soundararajan, Alex W. Yu, Pran M. Kar, Todd S. Ing Departments of Medicine, Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, 111.; Loyola University of Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, 111., USA In order to let our trainees gain experience in the proper performance of a renal biopsy, we have initiated a training program using a device described below (fig. 1) with the following equipment: (1) a large (100 X 70 X 70 cm) rectangular cardboard box (representing the back of a patient); (2) a holder with a long handle; (3) a pear (representing a kidney); (4) a Tru-Cut needle or a Frank­ lin modification of the Vim-Silverman biopsy needle. Procedure (1) An operator stands in front of the cardboard box which is placed upside down with its longer axis pointing from side to side. A large opening is made on the side of the box opposite to that of the operator. Through the opening and with a clamp, an assistant holds the pear. (2) The operator punctures the roof of the box with the biopsy needle and advances the latter until it just enters the pear (the resistance through which the needle penetrates can be increased by adding layers of card­ board material). The assistant will move the pear from side to side so as to mimic the movements of a kidney during respiration. Synchronously with the movements of the pear, the superior part of the needle (i.e. the part outside the box) will swing in a distinct, wide arc in the long axis of the box signifying that the needle has entered the pear (during actual clinical renal biopsy, a needle will behave in a similar manner when renal tissue has been entered) [8]. (3) After the ‘patient’ has been allowed to take a few normal ‘breaths’ (i.e. the assistant moves the pear from side to side a few times), the operator asks the ‘patient’ to hold his breath temporarily (i.e. the assistant keeps the pear stationary). Downloaded by: King's College London 137.73.144.138 - 1/15/2019 12:26:56 PM Renal biopsy is an invaluable tool in the pathologic diagnosis of kidney diseases [1-3]. Not infrequently the procedure is performed by trainees in nephrology fellow­ ship programs under the supervision of an experienced nephrologist. Since 1988, certification in nephrology by the American Board of Internal Medicine has implied competence in the performance of a renal biopsy [4], In addition, documented competence may soon be required by most hospitals before privileges to carry out this pro­ cedure are granted. Although renal biopsy is ordinarily quite safe when performed by competent personnel, hemorrhage of sufficient severity to warrant blood trans­ fusion or even nephrectomy may occur, and death has also been reported. Most of these complications [5-8], however, have taken place in inexperienced hands. Therefore, proper training in the performance of the pro­ cedure is of paramount importance. In our experience, the most difficult aspect of the pro­ cedure centers on the actual cutting of the renal tissue and retrieval of the specimen. When the commonly employed disposable needle (Tru-Cut™ needle; Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, 111., USA) is used, the operator must first extend the obturator while stabil­ izing the outer cannula. Subsequently, the cannula must be advanced over the obturator in order to sever the specimen, following which both the obturator and can­ nula are withdrawn together (should the modified VimSilverman needle be employed, its cutting prongs are first inserted into the kidney, following which the needle sheath is advanced over the prongs to ensnare the speci­ men). A common error is made when the operator, while advancing the cannula (or needle sheath in the case of a Vim-Silverman needle), fails to stabilize or, worse yet, even retracts the obturator (or cutting prongs), resulting in a failure to procure an adequate piece of tissue. 77 Renal Biopsy Simulator We have found that this training procedure is an invalu­ able aid to renal biopsy training for our trainees. With practice, most trainees should be able to regularly obtain full cores of renal tissue during clinical renal biopsy. References 1 Kark RM: Renal biopsy. JAMA 1968;205:220-226. 2 Cohen AH, Nast CC, Alder SG, Kopple JD: The clinical useful­ ness of kidney biopsies in the diagnosis and management of renal disease (abstract). Kidney Int 1984;27:135. 3 Manaligod JR, Pirani CL: Renal biopsy in 1985. Semin Nephrol 1985;5:237-239. 4 Health and Public Policy Committee, American College of Phy­ sicians: Clinical competence in percutaneous renal biopsy. Ann Intern Med 1988;108:301-303. 5 Gault MH, Muehrcke RC: Renal biopsy: Current views and con­ troversies. Nephron 1983;34:1-34. 6 Diaz-Buxo JA, Donadio JV Jr: Complications of percutaneous renal biopsy: An analysis of 1,000 consecutive biopsies. Clin Nephrol 1975;4:223-227. 7 Altebarmakian VK, Guthinger WP, Yakub YN, Gutierrez OH, (4) The operator then rests his elbows on the box and Linke CA: Percutaneous kidney biopsies - Complications and their management. Urology 1981 ; 18:118-122. advances the obturator into the pear. The cannula is then 8 Muehrcke RC, Pirani CL: Percutaneous needle biopsy; in Black advanced without moving the»obturator; both the can­ DAK (ed): Renal Disease, ed 2. Philadelphia, Davis, 1967, pp nula and the obturator are subsequently withdrawn to­ 170-205. Received: July 27, 1990 Accepted: August 20, 1990 T.S. Ing, MD Veterans Administration Hospital Hines, IL 60141 (USA) Downloaded by: King's College London 137.73.144.138 - 1/15/2019 12:26:56 PM gether from the pear and from the box. The operator then requests the ‘patient’ to resume ‘breathing’. If this sequence is done properly, a full core of tissue will be obtained. If the obturator is retracted during advance­ ment of the cannula, only a partial specimen or no spec­ imen will be procured.