Programmed Cell Death during Embryogenesis in Maize

Annals of Botany 90: 287±292, 2002 doi:10.1093/aob/mcf173, available online at www.aob.oupjournals.org Programmed Cell Death during Embryogenesis in Maize CONCETTA GIULIANI1, GABRIELLA CONSONNI2, GIUSEPPE GAVAZZI2, M O N I C A C O L O M B O 2 and S I L V A N A D O L F I N I 1 , * 1Dipartimento di Genetica e di Biologia dei microrganismi, Universita Á degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 26, 20133 Milano, Italy and 2Dipartimento di Produzione vegetale, UniversitaÁ degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy Received: 22 March 2002 Returned for revision: 2 May 2002 Accepted: 8 May 2002 Programmed cell death (PCD) in plants is considered an integral part of development. Evidence of DNA fragmentation, occurring at speci®c sites and times during embryo formation in maize (Zea mays L.), was obtained using terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-¯uorescein nick end labelling (TUNEL) and by genomic DNA ladder detection. During the crucial period of elaboration of the primary shoot and root axis (14±20 d after pollination), TUNEL-positive nuclei are present in the scutellum, coleoptile, root cap and principally in the suspensor. Additional evidence of a form of programmed cell death occurring in these tissues comes from the detection of a DNA ladder. Upon completion of the differentiation process, all embryonic cells are TUNEL-negative, indicating that possible programmed cell death events during maize embryogenesis are con®ned to structures or organs that do not contribute to the adult plant body. ã 2002 Annals of Botany Company Key words: Zea mays L., maize, embryogenesis, programmed cell death, TUNEL procedure, DNA ladder. INTRODUCTION Programmed cell death (PCD) is considered an integral part of development both in animals and plants. Such an inbuilt death programme is triggered in response to external or internal signals. Cell death may be envisaged as the necessary counterpart of cell division in determining the shape and morphology of tissues and organs during differentiation. Paradoxically, cell death is essential for the development and survival of an organism. In animal development, PCD has been extensively studied and the features of the process have been analysed at the cytological, biochemical and molecular levels (Vaux and Korsmeyer, 1999). When it is associated with speci®c biochemical and morphological events, such as DNA strand breaks, activation of caspases, chromatin condensation and nuclear fragmentation into distinct bodies, cell death is de®ned as apoptosis. Plants also undergo programmed cell death in a variety of situations. Some of these are developmentally regulated, while others are the consequence of biotic and abiotic stresses (Greenberg, 1996; Havel and Durzan, 1996a; Mittler and Lam, 1996; Martienssen, 1997; Pennell and Lamb, 1997; Lam et al., 1999; Lam and Greenberg, 2000; Wu and Cheung, 2000). The parallel between animal and plant cell death is under discussion, and similarities between such events have recently been reported (Danon et al., 2000). In maize, in particular, cell death events are known to occur throughout normal development both in the * For correspondence. Fax +39 02 50315044, e-mail silvana. dol®[email protected] sporophyte and in the gametophyte (Buckner et al., 1998, 2000). Cell death takes place during the formation of unisexual male and female ¯owers in microsporogenesis and megasporogenesis (Calderon-Urrea and Dellaporta, 1999), during xylem differentiation (Schindler et al., 1995), in roots during aerenchyma form ation (Gunawardena et al., 2001) and in leaf senes cence. During maize seed formation both in the embryo and endosperm, cells are thought to die at predictable times and places, though details of these events are still scanty. The suspensor, through which nutrients are transferred from maternal tissue to the developing embryo, is thought to undergo programmed cell death once its functions are accomplished (Yeung and Meinke, 1993). Cell death has also been demonstrated to occur in developing endosperm (aleurone and central endosperm), the function of which is to store and supply nutrients to the germinating seed (Young et al., 1997; Young and Gallie, 2000). To date, the genetic control of maize embryogenesis has been investigated by analysing mutants affected during embryo development. Less attention has been devoted to the study of cell death events that occur naturally during the process of embryo formation. In this report we present cytological and molecular evidence, based on the terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP-¯uorescein nick end-labelling (TUNEL) method (Gorczyca et al., 1993) and on DNA ladder detection, that programmed cell death probably occurs in speci®c sites and at speci®c moments during maize embryo formation. ã 2002 Annals of Botany Company 288 Giuliani et al. Ð PCD during Maize Embryogenesis MA TE R IA L S A N D ME T H O D S Plant material Seeds analysed in these experiments were obtained from maize plants of the inbred line W64A grown in the ®eld or under glasshouse conditions at the University of Milan, Italy. Histological analysis Immature seeds were dissected from cobs at ®xed intervals, from 14 to 27 d after pollination (DAP). Samples were immediately ®xed in freshly prepared 4 % p-formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (130 mM NaCl, 7 mM Na2HPO4, 3 mM NaH2PO4) for 12 h. The ®xed material was placed in 70 % ethanol and stored at 4 °C until processed. Embedding procedures were performed as described previously (Procissi et al., 1997). Sections (8 mm thick) attached to poly-lysine-coated slides were deparaf®nized with xylene for 10 min and then rehydrated by passing through a graded ethanol series for 3 min each. The different embryonic developmental stages were characterized by staining sections with safranin-fast green and with DAPI (4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; 1 mM in PBS for 10 min). In situ detection of DNA fragmentation To detect DNA fragmentation, the TUNEL procedure was applied, using the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Tissue was made permeable by incubating sections with Proteinase K (2 mg ml±1) for 15 min at 37 °C. DNA fragmentation was detected directly after the TUNEL reaction by yellow-green ¯uorescence of incorporated ¯uorescein-12-dUTP in the nuclei. Slides were examined using an Axioskop microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with a ®lter set for ¯uorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and photomicrographs were taken with Kodak Ektachrome 320T ®lm. Alternatively, incorporated ¯uorescein was detected by anti¯uorescein antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase. After substrate reaction, stained sections were analysed under a light microscope and photomicrographs were taken using Kodak 64T ®lm. A negative control was included in each experiment by omitting TdT from the reaction mixture. Under these conditions all nuclei should be unstained. As a positive control, permeabilized sections were incubated with DNase I (1 U ml±1) for 10 min at room temperature before processing. All nuclei in all seed tissues (embryo axis, scutellum, endosperm, pericarp) should be stained as a result of the induced DNA strand breaks. Experiments reported here were repeated at least three times; all results were in agreement across the experiments. DNA extraction and ladder detection Using W64A plants as a source material, genomic DNA was extracted from immature embryos following the CTAB protocol described in Ausubel et al. (1994). For the ladder detection, the ApoAlertÔ LM-PCR Ladder Assay Kit (Clontech Laboratories Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used, according to the manufacturer's instructions. As the ®rst step, dephosphorylated adaptors were ligated to the ends of the DNA fragments generated during cell death. A 24-mer primer was then used in a PCR reaction in which fragments with adaptors on both ends were exponentially ampli®ed. Ligation reactions were set up in 70 ml volume with different DNA quantities. In our conditions, results were obtained starting from 0´5 mg of genomic DNA and using 150 ng of ligated DNA in the PCR mixture with 20 and 25 cycles. Twenty microlitres from each reaction was run on a 1´2 % agarose/EtBr gel. A positive control reaction was performed using the calf thymus DNA supplied with the kit. A negative control was included, consisting of the PCR mixture without the adaptor-ligated DNA, and a further control was obtained by omitting ligase in the ®rst step. R E S U LT S In situ detection of DNA fragmentation in immature embryos The TUNEL procedure was applied to longitudinal sections of developing maize seeds to verify the occurrence of cell death events during embryo formation. In particular, attention was focused on the developmental interval between 14 and 27 DAP, from leaf stage 1 (L1) up to leaf stage 4 (L4), according to the classi®cation of Abbe and Stein (1954). Cell death events were demonstrated at speci®c sites during the developmental stages considered. Speci®c TUNEL signals, i.e. yellow-green ¯uorescence of ¯uorescein, which reveal nuclei undergoing DNA fragmentation, were detected mainly in the apical region of the embryo, in the scutellum layers adjacent to the coleoptile (Fig. 1) and in the suspensor (Fig. 2). In detail, at 14 DAP (stage L1; Fig. 1A), TUNEL-positive cells were particularly evident in the cell layers of the scutellum surrounding the shoot primordium (Fig. 1D±F). Fluorescent nuclei were also visible in the coleoptile and in the root cap cells (Fig. 1D), while nuclei of the cells of the embryo axis were all TUNEL negative. Particularly striking is the difference between positive ¯uorescent nuclei of the scutellum layers surrounding the shoot and the negative nuclei of the nearby leaf primordia (Fig. 1E and F). Close analysis of the positive nuclei reveals a difference that appeared on subsequent days of development: at 14 DAP in the positive nuclei, nucleoli (the negative dots inside the nucleus) were still visible (Fig. 1G), whereas later on, at 16 DAP, ¯uorescence increased and nucleoli were no longer identi®able. Figure 1H, in particular, reveals the difference between the nuclei of the scutellum where nucleoli are no longer visible and the nuclei of the nearby adjacent leaf primordia where one or two nucleoli are evident. In DAPIstained sections (Fig. 1B and C), at 17 DAP, the scutellum cell layers surrounding the coleoptile appeared devoid of a few nuclei, thus corroborating the TUNEL data in favour of a presumed death of these cells. Giuliani et al. Ð PCD during Maize Embryogenesis 289 F I G . 1. Programmed cell death in maize embryos at early developmental stages (stages L1±L2). A, Safranin-fast green staining of a longitudinal section of an embryo at 14 DAP. B and C, DAPI staining of longitudinal sections at 17 DAP showing evidence of nuclear loss (arrowheads) in scutellum layers surrounding the shoot. D±H, In situ detection of DNA fragmentation by the TUNEL procedure (yellow ¯uorescence on nuclei). TUNEL-positive nuclei are evident in the scutellum layers surrounding the coleoptile (D±F), in the coleoptile and in the root cap (D). F (enlargement of E) shows the difference between TUNEL-positive (yellow) and TUNEL-negative (dark green) nuclei. G, One or two nucleoli (arrows) are present in TUNEL-positive nuclei of the scutellum at 14 DAP. H, Nucleoli are absent in TUNEL-positive nuclei and present (arrows) in TUNEL-negative nuclei at 16 DAP. c, Coleoptile; end, endosperm; lp, leaf primordium; p, pericarp; rc, root cap; rp, root primordium; s, suspensor; sc, scutellum. Bars = 100 mm for A±E and 20 mm for F±H. As for the suspensor (Fig. 2), DNA fragmentation was demonstrated at 14 DAP by TUNEL assay, both directly (yellow-green ¯uorescence of incorporated ¯uorescein) (Fig. 2A) and indirectly (by a colorimetric reaction) (Fig. 2B). DAPI staining at subsequent times (14 and 16 DAP) showed a progressive disappearance of nuclei starting from the upper part of the suspensor (Fig. 2C and F). Histological analysis con®rmed this observation since a morphological difference in the appearance of nuclei could be observed at 15 DAP (Fig. 2D and E): in the upper portion of the suspensor, nuclei showed chromatin condensation, whereas in the lower part they were still rounded and swollen. On the basis of these observations, DNA fragmentation precedes chromatin degradation and the degeneration process proceeds from the top towards the bottom of the suspensor. At later developmental stages (27 DAP, stage L4; Fig. 3), the whole of the embryo was TUNEL-negative, except for only a few ¯uorescent nuclei at the level of the scutellar node. In the two maternal tissues, the pericarp and nucellus, brightly ¯uorescent nuclei (visible only in Fig. 1D and E) were evident at all developmental stages analysed. Appropriate control treatments were conducted for every set of slides (Fig. 4). When the DNase I treatment preceded the TUNEL procedure, all nuclei in all regions of the embryo (Fig. 4A) and of the endosperm (Fig. 4C) were ¯uorescent (positive control). On the other hand, no ¯uorescence was observed in the same tissues when TdT 290 Giuliani et al. Ð PCD during Maize Embryogenesis F I G . 2. Programmed cell death in the suspensor of the maize embryo. A and B, TUNEL-positive nuclei in the suspensor at 14 DAP visualized directly (A) by ¯uorescein ¯uorescence and indirectly (B) by the secondary anti-¯uorescein-AP conjugate. C and F, DAPI staining of the suspensor nuclei in longitudinal sections at 14 DAP (C) and at 16 DAP (F). D and E, Safranin-fast green staining of a longitudinal section at 15 DAP. sc, Scutellum; s, suspensor. Bars = 50 mm. F I G . 3. Programmed cell death in maize embryos at a late developmental stage (stage L4). A, Safranin-fast green staining of a longitudinal section of an embryo at 27 DAP. B and C, TUNEL procedure on the upper portion of the embryo (B) and on the lower portion (C). The only ¯uorescent nuclei visible are those corresponding to the scutellar node. c, Coleoptile; lp, leaf primordiuma; p, pericarp; rp, root primordium; sc, scutellum; sn, scutellar node. Bars = 100 mm. enzyme was omitted from the reaction (negative control) (Fig. 4B and D). Ladder detection in immature embryos As demonstrated above, apparently only a small percentage of nuclei in our biological system undergo cell death (approx. 5 %, according to a rough count). Therefore, DNA fragments produced by endonuclease activity during the degradation process were not detectable following electrophoresis of genomic DNA directly on ethidium bromidestained agarose gels (data not shown). Puri®ed genomic DNA from embryos at 17 DAP was assayed by the LM-PCR procedure (as described in Materials and Methods). Pro®les obtained using 1 mg of DNA in the ligation reaction and following 20 and 25 PCR cycles are shown in Fig. 5 (lanes 1 and 2, respectively). The positive control is shown in lane 3. Comparing the embryo pro®les and the positive control shows that despite the high sensitivity of the kit, the ef®ciency of the reaction was low and the pro®les became less clear as the cycle number is increased from 20 to 25. The low ef®ciency might be due to the poor availability of 5¢ phosphorylated ends in the genomic DNA, an observation supported by the fact that the Giuliani et al. Ð PCD during Maize Embryogenesis 291 D I SC U S S IO N F I G . 4. Controls of the TUNEL procedure. A and C, Positive controls. All nuclei of the different regions of the embryo (A) and endosperm (C) are TUNEL-positive. B and D, Negative controls. All nuclei in the embryo (B) and in the endosperm (D) are TUNEL-negative. al, Aleurone; c, coleoptile; end, endosperm; p, pericarp; sam, shoot apical meristem; sc, scutellum; s, suspensor. Bars = 100 mm. F I G . 5. Puri®ed genomic DNA assayed by LM-PCR. Pro®les obtained from 17 DAP embryos after 20 (lane 1) and 25 (lane 2) PCR cycles and calf thymus DNA after 25 cycles (lane 3) are visible loading 20 ml of the reaction on 1´2 % agarose/EtBr gel. Lane 4, Negative control. Sizes of markers (lane M) are indicated. amount of DNA added to the ligation mix was a limiting factor. However, speci®city of the ampli®ed bands can be corroborated by the results obtained in the sample in lane 4, where ligation of adaptors was omitted and no ampli®cation products were detected. In the negative control, consisting of the ampli®cation mix without genomic DNA, no ampli®cation products were obtained (data not shown). Our investigation focused on cell death in the maize seed, and, in particular, on its occurrence during embryo development. It is generally accepted that in normal animal and plant morphogenesis PCD eliminates cells at speci®c places and/or at speci®c times to contribute towards the formation of correctly shaped structures and organs. It also removes cells that are present in excess, or tissues needed at just one stage of development but not required later. The cytological and molecular data clearly indicate that DNA fragmentation, characteristic of programmed cell death, occurs during maize embryo formation. PCD events are observed during the crucial period of elaboration of the primary shoot and root axis, when regionalization of the embryo proper into the scutellum and embryo axis occurs. TUNEL-positive nuclei are visible in the cell layers of the scutellum surrounding the shoot primordium and in the coleoptile, but never in leaf primordia. This observation is relevant in the context of the assumption that the scutellum and coleoptile differ from leaves both in terms of origin and function. Scanlon and Freeling (1998) proposed that these two organs do not derive from the shoot apical meristem, as leaves do, but instead differentiate before the formation of the tunica corpus-shaped apex. Recently, Bommert and Werr (2001) af®rmed that the protodermal cell fate is maintained in the scutellum and coleoptile, two organs set apart from the shoot/root axis in a single regionalization event. It is known that TUNEL positivity may be ascribed to programmed cell death, a high mitotic activity or to necrosis. The observation of Elster et al. (2000) that initial scutellar growth is mainly the result of cellular expansion rather than division supports the hypothesis that the ¯uorescence observed in the scutellum is the consequence of programmed cell death events in the context of morphogenetic processes. As to its function, the scutellum is utilized during seed germination as a food source for the developing embryo organ, whereas the coleoptile encloses and protects the embryonic shoot. The presence in the scutellum of cells destined to die may therefore be associated with the developmental processes or with the transient function of this organ. In the coleoptile, cells committed to programmed cell death have already been demonstrated by an immunological approach and are considered to be future xylem cells (Schindler et al., 1995). Further evidence of programmed cell death in these tissues comes from the observation of nucleoli in the TUNEL-positive cells of the scutellum. As demonstrated for suspensor and endosperm cells of Vicia faba (Wredle et al., 2001), dispersion of the nucleoli (one of the parameters of nuclear degradation), is probably occurring since nucleoli keep their round and condensed shapes for some time before they become no longer visible within the nuclei. For better characterization of their fate, our observations need to be integrated with ultrastructural investigations. TUNEL-positive nuclei are also evident in the suspensor, a structure that functions temporarily early in embryogenesis, and then later degenerates (Yeung and Meinke, 1993). Recently, Danon et al. (2000) pointed out that until now, no speci®c PCD hallmarks for the elimination of the suspensor 292 Giuliani et al. Ð PCD during Maize Embryogenesis have been reported. Our evidence indicates that PCD does take place in the course of the degeneration of the suspensor, according to a controlled spatial and temporal pattern. Later in development, when morphogenetic processes have been completed and the embryo only enlarges, ¯uorescent cells are no longer visible, except for a few positive nuclei corresponding to the scutellar node, in connection with the development of vascular tissue. Therefore, during embryogenesis, TUNEL-positive cells are con®ned to structures or organs (the scutellum, suspensor and coleoptile, as well as the pericarp and nucellus) that do not contribute to the adult plant body, while the embryo axis is devoid of such cells. Our results should be interpreted with caution. In recent years, data have been accumulating on the application of the TUNEL assay to different plants under physiological or induced conditions to reveal the occurrence of programmed cell death (Havel and Durzan, 1996b; Wang et al., 1996a, b, 1999; Groover and Jones, 1999; Marubashi et al., 1999; Takahashi et al., 1999). It is generally accepted that a positive TUNEL assay is not a suf®cient criterion for the identi®cation of PCD. We can therefore conclude that our TUNEL-positive results are indicative of a relatively ordered process of chromatin degradation, in which the DNA has been broken down by an endonuclease. However, the detection of a genomic DNA ladder, despite the dif®culty of detecting such ladders in this heterogeneous tissue in which a limited number of cells undergo cell death, corroborates the hypothesis that programmed cell death does really occur during the complex process of maize embryo formation. A C K N O WL E D G E ME N T This work was supported by a grant from the Ministero dell'UniversitaÁ e della Ricerca Scienti®ca (M.U.R.S.T.COFIN 98) to S.D. L ITE R A T U R E C IT E D Abbe EC, Stein OL. 1954. The growth of shoot apex in maize: embryogeny. American Journal of Botany 41: 285±293. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Sidman JG, Smith J. 1994. Current protocols in molecular biology. Vol 1. New York: Green Publishing Associates and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Bommert P, Werr W. 2001. Gene expression patterns in the maize caryopsis: clues to decisions in embryo and endosperm development. Gene 271: 131±142. Buckner B, Johal GS, Janick-Buckner D. 2000. Cell death in maize. Physiologia Plantarum 108: 231±239. Buckner B, Janick-Buckner D, Gray J, Johal GS. 1998. Cell death mechanisms in maize. Trends in Plant Science 3: 218±223. Calderon-Urrea A, Dellaporta SL. 1999. Cell death and cell protection genes determine the fate of pistils in maize. Development 126: 435±441. Danon A, Delorme V, Mailhac N, Gallois P. 2000. Plant programmed cell death: a common way to die. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 38: 647±655. Elster R, Bommert P, Sheridan WF, Werr W. 2000. Analysis of four embryo-speci®c mutants in Zea mays reveals that incomplete radial organization of the proembryo interferes with subsequent development. Development Genes Evolution 210: 300±310. Gorczyca W, Gong J, Darzynkiewicz Z. 1993. Detection of DNA strand breaks in individual apoptotic cells by the in situ terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and nick translation assay. Cancer Research 53: 1945±1951. Greenberg JT. 1996. Programmed cell death: a way of life for plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93: 12094±12097. Groover A, Jones AM. 1999. Tracheary element differentiation uses a novel mechanism coordinating programmed cell death and secondary cell wall synthesis. Plant Physiology 119: 375±384. Gunawardena AHLAN, Pearce DM, Jackson MB, Hawes CR, Evans DE. 2001. Characterisation of programmed cell death during aerenchyma formation induced by ethylene or hypoxia in roots of maize (Zea mays L.). Planta 212: 205±214. Havel L, Durzan DJ. 1996a. Apoptosis in plants. Botanica Acta 109: 268±277. Havel L, Durzan DJ. 1996b. Apoptosis during diploid parthenogenesis and early somatic embryogenesis of Norway spruce. International Journal of Plant Science 157: 8±16. Lam E, Greenberg J. 2000. Cell death: the `Yin' path in the balancing of the life cycle. Plant Molecular Biology 44: vii±viii. Lam E, Pontier D, del Pozo O. 1999. Die and let live ± programmed cell death in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2: 502±507. Martienssen R. 1997. Fatal induction in plants. Current Biology 7: R534±R537. Marubashi W, Yamada T, Niwa M. 1999. Apoptosis detected in hybrids between Nicotiana glutinosa and N. repanda expressing lethality. Planta 210: 168±171. Mittler R, Lam E. 1996. Sacri®ce in the face of foes: pathogen-induced programmed cell death in plants. Trends in Microbiology 4: 10±15. Pennell RI, Lamb C. 1997. Programmed cell death in plants. The Plant Cell 9: 1157±1168. Procissi A, Dol®ni S, Ronchi A, Tonelli C. 1997. Light-dependent spatial and temporal expression of pigment regulatory genes in developing maize seeds. The Plant Cell 9: 1±12. Scanlon JM, Freeling M. 1998. The narrow sheath leaf domain deletion: a genetic tool used to reveal developmental homologies among modi®ed maize organs. Plant Journal 13: 547±561. Schindler T, Bergfeld R, Schopfer P. 1995. Arabinogalactan proteins in maize coleoptiles: developmental relationship to cell death during xylem differentiation but not to extension growth. Plant Journal 7: 25±36. Takahashi A, Kawasaki T, Henmi K, Shii K, Kodama O, Satoh H, Shimamoto K. 1999. Lesion mimic mutants of rice with alterations in early signaling events of defense. Plant Journal 17: 535±545. Vaux DL, Korsmeyer SJ. 1999. Cell death in development. Cell 96: 245±254. Wang H, Li J, Bostock RM, Gilchrist DG. 1996a. Apoptosis: a functional paradigm for programmed plant cell death induced by a host-selective phytotoxin and invoked during development. The Plant Cell 8: 375±391. Wang M, Oppedijk BJ, Lu X, Van Duijn B, Schilperoort RA. 1996b. Apoptosis in barley aleurone during germination and its inhibition by abscisic acid. Plant Molecular Biology 31: 1125±1134. Wang M, Hoekstra S, van Bergen S, Lamers GEM, Oppedijk BJ, van der Heijden MW, de Priester W, Schilperoort RA. 1999. Apoptosis in developing anthers and the role of ABA in this process during androgenesis in Hordeum vulgare L. Plant Molecular Biology 39: 489±501. Wredle U, Walles B, Hakman I. 2001. DNA fragmentation and nuclear degradation during programmed cell death in the suspensor and endosperm of Vicia faba. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 1053±1063. Wu H, Cheung AY. 2000. Programmed cell death in plant reproduction. Plant Molecular Biology 44: 267±281. Yeung EC, Meinke DW. 1993. Embryogenesis in angiosperms: development of the suspensor. The Plant Cell 5: 1371±1381. Young TE, Gallie DR. 2000. Regulation of programmed cell death in maize endosperm by abscisic acid. Plant Molecular Biology 42: 397±414 Young TE, Gallie DR, DeMason DA. 1997. Ethylene-mediated programmed cell death during maize endosperm development of wild-type and shrunken2 genotypes. Plant Physiology 115: 737±751.