Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications
Vol. 1 No. 4 (2016) 391–398
ISSN 2009-8618
DOI 10.15212/CVIA.2016.0025
REVIEW
Smoking and Passive Smoking
Russell V. Luepker, MD, MS1
1
Mayo Professor, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA
Abstract
Objective: To review the literature on associations between cardiovascular diseases and tobacco use, including recent
trends in smoking behaviors and clinical approaches for cessation of smoking.
Methods: A literature review of recent scientific findings for smoking and cardiovascular diseases and recommendations for obtaining cessation.
Results: Tobacco smoking is causally related to cardiovascular disease, with nearly a half million deaths annually
attributed to cigarette smoking in the United States. The human, economic, medical, and indirect costs are enormous.
Secondhand smoke as inhaled from the environment also plays an important role in the genesis of cardiovascular
diseases. A recent trend in the use of e-cigarettes is noted particularly among youth. For children, prevention is the
best strategy. For adult smokers, behavioral treatments, self-help approaches, and pharmacologic therapies are readily
available. Clinicians can have a significant impact on patients’ smoking habits. Adding to individual strategies, regulatory community and public health approaches provide the potential for eliminating the use of tobacco.
Conclusion: Tobacco smoke causes cardiovascular morbidity and death. Clinicians can play a role in preventing
smoking and promoting cessation.
Keywords: tobacco; cigarettes; smoking cessation; e-cigarettes; secondhand smoke; myocardial infarction; stroke
Introduction
The addictive cigarette smoking habit is a leading cause of death and disability from chronic
diseases around the world. In industrialized countries, tobacco use contributes the largest number of
years of life lost [1]. In the United States it is estimated that more than 480,000 deaths annually are
associated with smoking, and cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause [2] (Figure 1). Although
smoking rates have declined in wealthy countries,
Correspondence: Russell V. Luepker, MD, MS, Mayo
Professor, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health,
School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 S
Second St, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA,
Tel.: +1-612-6246362, Fax: +1-612-6240315,
E-mail:
[email protected]
© 2016 Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications
there are increasing rates of smoking in low- and
middle-income countries [3] (Figure 2). Many
people have quit smoking, but younger smokers are recruited; those who remain are addicted
and are particularly difficult to treat [4]. Cigarette
smoking also affects nonsmokers through passive
or secondhand smoke [5]. The scientific evidence
underlying the dangers of cigarette smoking and
tobacco use are described herein along with trends
in cigarette use and strategies for prevention and
cessation of the cigarette-smoking habit.
Cigarette Smoking and
Cardiovascular Disease
The causal relationship of lung cancer with cigarette smoking has been known for many decades.
Cardiovascular diseases were first suggested as an
392
R.V. Luepker, Smoking and Passive Smoking
Ischemic heart
disease
133,000
Other cancers
36,000
Stroke
15,300
Lung cancer
135,000
Other
diagnoses
60,000
Chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease
100,600
Figure 1: More than 480,000 US Deaths Each Year From
Cigarette Smoking, Including Secondhand Smoke.
Source: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/
reports/50-years-of-progress/sgr50-chap-12.pdf
(accessed 2016 May 30).
outcome of cigarette smoking in the early 1960s.
In 1962, epidemiologic studies from Framingham,
Massachusetts, and Albany, New York, found an
association between coronary heart disease and
smoking among men [6, 7]. Further studies found
a similar association among women and included
other cardiovascular diseases [7]. It is now known
that smoking is associated with all the major cardiovascular diseases, including coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, sudden death, stroke,
and peripheral artery disease [7]. These associations are found in all sex, age, ethnic, and racial
groups. Smoking cessation can have a profound
impact on reducing the incidence of these diseases
[8, 9].
The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial
screened 316,099 men and demonstrated a graded
relationship between the number of cigarettes
smoked daily and the relative risk of death from
coronary heart disease [10]. The relative risk is
2.1 for consumption of 1–25 cigarettes per day,
rising to 2.9 for more than 25 cigarettes per day.
The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial and
many other studies demonstrate that quitting smoking reduces incident cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality [9, 11]. It is also known that
those who quit smoking following an acute event
such as a myocardial infarction have a significantly
improved prognosis [12].
The interaction of cigarette smoking with other
established risk factors is also well described, with
some suggesting the outcome is additive, whereas
others argue there is a multiplier effect (Figure 2).
Smoking adds to cardiovascular risk with hypertension, lipid abnormalities, diabetes, obesity,
oral contraception use, and electrocardiogram
Figure 2: Prevalence of Tobacco Smoking. Age-Standardized Prevalence of Current Tobacco Smoking Among Males Aged
15 Years or Older (%), 2015.
Source: http://gamapserver.who.int/gho/interactive_charts/tobacco/use/atlas.html.
R.V. Luepker, Smoking and Passive Smoking
abnormality [13–16]. Experiments in laboratory
animals and humans have advanced our understanding of the mechanisms by which cigarette
smoking can influence cardiovascular disease
both acutely and chronically. The pharmacologic
effects of nicotine are many, including sympathetic stimulation and coronary vasoconstriction
[15]. Carbon monoxide in cigarette smoke binds
to hemoglobin and reduces the oxygen-carrying
ability of the blood. Other components of cigarette
smoke increase platelet activation and other thrombotic factors. The many toxic chemicals found
in cigarette smoke are associated with increased
inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and a prothrombotic state [16].
Secondhand Smoke
A 2006 US Surgeon General report entitled “Health
consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco
smoke” is focused on environmental exposure [5].
It describes significant increases in the incidence
of cardiovascular and other diseases among those
exposed to secondhand tobacco smoke.
A subsequent review by the Institute of Medicine
came to similar conclusions [17]. Exposure to secondhand smoke increases the risk of coronary heart
disease by 25–30%. Other studies demonstrate that
the incidence of myocardial infarctions decreased
after a smoking ban was implemented, with
decreases ranging from 6% to 47%. In addition to
cardiovascular diseases, secondhand smoke is also
associated with cancer and respiratory diseases [17].
A comparison of home-based and worksite studies
reported an overall increased risk of cardiovascular
diseases associated with environmental smoke but
found no differences between smoke exposure in
the home or at work [18].
The mechanisms by which secondhand smoke
affects others is debated; they probably resemble
the pathway in the primary smoker but may have
other effects. Mainstream smoke, which is inhaled
by the primary smoker, differs from sidestream
smoke, which is released into the environment [5].
It is possible that sidestream smoke may be more
toxic, and physiologic changes among nonsmokers
who are regularly exposed to cigarette smoke could
have widespread effects. These include lower levels
393
of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, increased
atrial fibrillation, and platelet abnormality [5]. Also
observed are endothelial dysfunction and lower
exercise tolerance. All these factors are associated
with increased incidence of cardiovascular disease
and, coupled with the positive effects of smoking
bans on nonsmokers, reinforce the importance of
reducing exposure to secondhand smoke.
Trends in Cigarette Smoking
Following World War II, cigarette smoking became
common in the United States with the return of soldiers [6]. Cigarettes were provided as part of food
rations (K-rations) used by the military [6]. Women
gradually attained equivalency with men in smoking rates. By 1965 cigarette smoking was a habit
of 42.4% of adults [19]. Since that peak in 1965,
cigarette smoking has steadily declined nationally
with smokers quitting and many never acquiring
the habit [19]. By 2014, 17% of the adult population aged 18 years or older were regular smokers.
Trends in smoking by sex and race are depicted
in Figure 3. Declines in smoking have been
observed in all groups but higher rates continue
to be observed in white and black men and white
women. The rates for Hispanics/Latinos and Asians
are the lowest [20]. The trend of decline is likely to
continue as most smokers describe an interest in
quitting and approximately half attempted to quit
during the previous year [19]; however, only 6%
were successful.
Historically, smoking begins in middle school and
becomes regular in high school [4]. Smokers became
addicted as they grew older and more liberated from
the constraints of home and school. However, more
recent data show cigarette smoking among those
aged 12–17 years has fallen significantly, with the
percentage of adolescents using tobacco products
decreasing from 15.2% in 2003 to 7.8% in 2013.
New regulations led the tobacco industry to focus
more on young adults who are able to legally smoke
and have the economic resources to buy cigarettes.
This approach has had some success, with men and
women aged 18–44 years having higher smoking
rates than the general population [20]. Many in this
group are certain that they will not become addicted
and can quit later in life.
394
R.V. Luepker, Smoking and Passive Smoking
40
40
Women
Men
30
30
20
20
10
Black only, not Hispanic
White only, not Hispanic
Hispanic or Latino
Asian only, not Hispanic
Black only, not Hispanic
White only, not Hispanic
Hispanic or Latino
Asian only, not Hispanic
10
0
0
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
Figure 3: Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults Aged 18 Years or Older, by Sex and Race and Hispanic Origin:
United States, 1999–2014.
Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics, National Health Interview Survey.
Lowering Tobacco Use Among Youth
The tobacco smoking habit begins among youth
and young adults. Research was initially described
in the 1994 Surgeon General’s report on preventing
tobacco use among young people, and more recent
research is summarized in the Surgeon General’s
report of 2012 [4]. Use of mass media is one
approach, with messages presented multiple times
over media channels viewed by this age group.
These messages are mainly on television and radio
[4]. Media strategies that are aimed at adults also
have an effect on youth.
Regulatory approaches are also useful in reducing
tobacco use among youth. Youth are particularly
sensitive to increased cigarette prices resulting from
tobacco taxes. Increased costs reduce the likelihood
of youth starting smoking and reduce the number
of cigarettes smoked. Young smokers are affected
by regulations eliminating tobacco use in public
places. A combination of increased taxation, use
of mass media, restriction of public smoking, and
prevention programs in schools has been shown to
be effective in reducing cigarette smoking among
youth as shown by the steady decline of cigarette
use in this age group [21].
Although the smoking of cigarettes among
youth is falling, a new trend is emerging to take its
place, the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes)
among middle and high school students [22]. In
2015, e-cigarettes became the most commonly
used tobacco product among middle (5.3%) and
high (16%) school students. The use of hookahs
also increased in this age group. Although marketed as a safe cigarette and a way to quit smoking,
e-cigarettes are a path to addiction. The use of fruit
and other flavors suggests that youth are the targeted audience. Unfortunately, these products are
new and less is known about the long-term health
effects or conversion rates to regular tobacco use.
Many have called for increasing regulation of these
new alternatives [23].
Smoking Cessation Approaches
Most current smokers report a desire to quit the
habit. In 2013 approximately two-thirds of adult
smokers reported they had attempted to quit in the
previous year [24]. Unfortunately only a small proportion (6%) reported a successful quit attempt.
Numerous programs are available in communities to aid in quit attempts. These include behavioral approaches, pharmacologic intervention,
and other strategies. Many resources are available to help individuals who wish to quit smoking.
They include the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention Helping Quit Smoking Program (http://
www.cdc.gov/tobacco/quit_smoking/how_to_quit/
index.htm), resources from the American Heart
Association (http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/
HealthyLiving/QuitSmoking/QuittingResources/
R.V. Luepker, Smoking and Passive Smoking
R e s o u r c e s - t o - H e l p - Yo u - Q u i t - S m o k i n g _
UCM_307934_Article.jsp#.V1rWfdddQ4t), and
resources from the National Institutes of Health
(https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/healthtopics.html).
Behavioral Strategies
Nicotine is an addictive substance, and behavioral approaches to smoking cessation are critical
tools. Successful programs, including those using
nicotine replacement or other pharmaceuticals, are
best when combined with behavioral treatment
components. Many behavioral approaches have
been tested alone with differing degrees of success.
Specific behavioral components include aversive
smoking, intratreatment social support, problem
solving skills training, quit date setting, specific
social support, weight control, nutrition, exercise,
contingency contracts, relaxation techniques, and
cigarette fading. Although many of these strategies are not very effective alone, they may work in
combination.
Pharmacologic Interventions
Environmental cues and triggers encourage smoking for all smokers. These can be addressed in
behavioral programs; however, nicotine addiction is a common theme in many patients [25]. A
number of pharmacologic agents are recognized
as effective by the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA), and these will be discussed below. There
are also agents that have been used “off label” or
without FDA approval. These will not be discussed
here. Many of the agents involve some form of nicotine replacement: nicotine gum, nicotine inhaler,
nicotine lozenges, nicotine nasal spray, and nicotine patches. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. All may result in a new dependency among
some smokers.
The nicotine patch is convenient and needs to
be applied once each day. It allows flexible dosing, and once it has been placed on the skin, the
delivery of nicotine is consistent but slow. Nicotine
gum allows flexible dosing but can be more difficult to use correctly. Many gum users do not
adequately dose themselves with this medication.
Nicotine nasal spray has the advantage of flexible
395
dosing plus it provides faster delivery of the drug.
For many users, nasal and eye irritation is a problem as frequent use may be necessary to build an
adequate nicotine dose. The nicotine inhaler allows
more flexible dosing and mimics the hand-to-mouth
behavior of smoking. The inhaler also has fewer
side effects. The nicotine lozenge is convenient and
allows flexible dosing. Nicotine replacement therapy has been found to be effective in randomized
trials [26]. Some nicotine replacement therapies
are available without a prescription, whereas others
require a physician’s approval.
Bupropion hydrochloride is approved by the FDA
for smoking cessation and is available in tablet
form. It appears to act on brain chemistry to mimic
the effects of nicotine among smokers. There is evidence to suggest that a combination of a nicotine
patch and bupropion use may be more effective than
use of either alone [27]. Bupropion has been available for many years as an antidepressant, however,
it works well in smokers without the symptoms of
depression. It has the potential side effects of all
antidepressants, including suicidality, depression,
anxiety, panic attacks, insomnia, and irritability.
Monitoring patients for these symptoms is recommended, along with social support for cessation of
smoking.
Several nicotine receptor partial agonists are used
for smoking cessation. These stimulate nicotine
receptors and help to reduce the craving. Only varenicline is approved by the FDA in the United States.
It is a pill available by a prescription. Varenicline
should not be used with other quit smoking products.
Common side effects include nausea and insomnia
but serious behavioral side effects have also been
observed. Varenicline received a black box warning
in 2009 because of side effects including agitation,
depression, and suicidality [28].
Clinical Approaches
Clinicians have many opportunities to advocate
smoking cessation. The hospital, where nonsmoking
is mandated, can be a good place to begin the cessation program. An acute illness such as myocardial
infarction may provide that unique opportunity. A
recent Cochrane review of interventions for smoking
cessation in hospitalized patients revealed a number of important observations [29]. High-intensity
396
R.V. Luepker, Smoking and Passive Smoking
behavioral interventions beginning during the hospital stay and continuing for at least one month after
discharge were successful in achieving smoking
cessation. Other interventions with lower intensity
have little effect. The addition of nicotine replacement therapy to counseling significantly increased
cessation rates compared with those achieved by
counseling alone. No data were found to suggest that
addition of bupropion or varenicline treatment to
intensive counseling increases cessation rates over
those achieved by counseling alone [29].
The outpatient clinic visit is also an opportunity to
advocate smoking cessation. Many clinics ask about
smoking and other behaviors along with allergies at
every patient visit. The answer is usually the same,
but this emphasizes the importance of smoking cessation to an individual’s health. It also provides an
opportunity for the clinician to advocate smoking
cessation and referral to cessation resources.
The overall strategy is as follows:
1. Tobacco dependence is a chronic disease that
often requires repeated intervention and multiple attempts to quit. Effective treatments exist,
however, that can significantly increase rates of
long-term abstinence.
2. It is essential that clinicians and health care
delivery systems consistently identify and document tobacco use status and treat every tobacco
user seen in a health care setting.
3. Tobacco dependence treatments are effective
across a broad range of populations. Clinicians
should encourage every patient willing to make
a quit attempt to use the counseling treatments
and medication recommended.
4. Brief tobacco dependence treatment is effective.
Clinicians should offer every patient who uses
tobacco treatments shown to be effective.
5. Individual, group, and telephone counseling are
effective, and their effectiveness increases with
treatment intensity. Two components of counseling are especially effective, and clinicians
should use these when counseling patients making a quit attempt:
a. Practical counseling (problem solving/skills
training)
b. Social support delivered as part of treatment
6. Numerous effective medications are available
for tobacco dependence, and clinicians should
encourage their use by all patients attempting to quit smoking – except when their use
is medically contraindicated or with a specific
population for which there is insufficient evidence of effectiveness (i.e. pregnant women,
smokeless tobacco users, light smokers, and
adolescents):
a. Seven first-line medications (five nicotine
and two non-nicotine) reliably increase longterm smoking abstinence rates:
i. Bupropion
ii. Nicotine gum
iii. Nicotine inhaler
iv. Nicotine lozenge
v. Nicotine nasal spray
vi. Nicotine patch
vii. Varenicline
b. Clinicians also should consider the use of
certain combinations of medications identified as effective.
7. Counseling and medication are effective when
used by themselves for treating tobacco dependence. The combination of counseling and medication, however, is more effective than use of
either alone. Thus clinicians should encourage
all individuals attempting to quit smoking to use
both counseling and medication.
8. Telephone quitline counseling is effective with
diverse populations and has a broad reach. Therefore clinicians and health care delivery systems
should both ensure patient access to quitlines
and promote quitline use.
9. Tobacco dependence treatments are both clinically effective and highly cost-effective relative
to interventions for other clinical disorders. Providing coverage for these treatments increases
quit rates. Insurers and purchasers should ensure
that all insurance plans include the counseling
and medication identified as effective as covered
benefits.
Clinicians have greater success in achieving smoking cessation in patients than most believe. The five
hints for smoking cessation counseling by physicians are as follows:
R.V. Luepker, Smoking and Passive Smoking
1. Ask: systematically identify all tobacco users at
every visit.
2. Advise: strongly urge all smokers to quit.
3. Attempt: identify smokers willing to try to quit.
4. Assist: aid the patient in quitting.
5. Arrange: schedule follow-up contact.
The amount of time required to do this is minimal
and the potential for health improvement great [30].
Conclusions
Tobacco smoking is causally related to cardiovascular disease. Nearly a half million deaths annually
are attributed to tobacco smoking in the United
States. The economic cost, medical expenses, and
397
indirect costs are enormous. The human cost in suffering exceeds the economic costs. Environmental
smoke as inhaled as secondhand smoke is also an
important cause of up to 40,000 deaths annually
from cardiovascular disease. For adults, behavioral treatments, self-help approaches, and pharmacologic therapy are readily available. These
measures, in combination with regulatory, community, and public health approaches, provide the
potential for eliminating use of tobacco, one of
the greatest health-impairing behaviors affecting
humans.
Conflict of Interest
The author declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
World Health Organization. Global
health risks: mortality and burden
of disease attributable to selected
major risks. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2009.
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Office on Smoking
and Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and
Health Promotion. http://www.cdc.
gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_
sheets/ [accessed 2016 June 17].
Jamal A, Homa DM, O’Connor
E, Babb SD, Caraballo RS, Singh
T, et al. Current cigarette smoking among adults – United States,
2005–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal
Wkly Rep 2015;64:1233–40.
[accessed 2016 June 4].
US Department of Health and
Human
Services.
Preventing
tobacco use among youth and
young adults: a report of the
Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US
Department of Health and Human
Services, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, National
Center for Chronic Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion,
Office on Smoking and Health;
2012.
5.
US Department of Health and
Human Services. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report
of the Surgeon General. Atlanta,
GA: US Department of Health
and Human Services, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention,
Coordinating Center for Health
Promotion, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and
Health Promotion, Office on
Smoking and Health; 2006.
6. Filion KB, Luepker RV. Cigarette
smoking and cardiovascular disease: lessons from Framingham.
Global Heart 2013;8:35–41.
7. US Department of Health and
Human Services. The health consequences of smoking: cardiovascular disease: a report of the Surgeon
General. Rockville, MD: US
Department of Health and Human
Services, Public Health Service,
Office on Smoking and Health,
DHHS publication no. (PHS)
84-50204; 1983.
8. National Cancer Institute. Smoking
and tobacco control monograph 8.
Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services,
National Institutes of Health,
National Cancer Institute. Changes
in cigarette-related disease risks
and their implication for prevention and control. NIH publication
no. 97-4213; 1997.
9. US Department of Health and
Human Services. The health benefits of smoking cessation: a report
of the Surgeon General. Rockville,
MD: US Department of Health and
Human Services, Public Health
Service, Centers for Disease
Control, Center for Chronic
Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion, Office on Smoking
and Health. DHHS publication no.
(CDC) 90-8416; 1990.
10. Neaton JD, Wentworth D. Serum
cholesterol, blood pressure, cigarette smoking, and death from
coronary heart disease: overall
findings and differences by age for
316,099 white men. Arch Intern
Med 1992;152:56–64.
11. The
Multiple
Risk
Factor
Intervention Trial Research Group.
Mortality after 16 years for participants randomized to the multiple risk factor intervention trial.
Circulation 1996;94:946–51.
398
R.V. Luepker, Smoking and Passive Smoking
12. Hermanson B, Omenn GS, Kronmal
RA, Gersh BJ. Beneficial six-year
outcome of smoking cessation in
older men and women with coronary artery disease: results from
the CASS registry. N Engl J Med
1988;319:1365–9.
13. Pooling Project Research Group.
Relationship of blood pressure,
serum cholesterol, smoking habit,
relative weight, and-ECG abnormalities to incidence of major
coronary events: final report of
the Pooling Project. J Chronic Dis
1978;31:201–306.
14. Suarez L, Barrett-Connor E.
Interaction
between
cigarette
smoking and diabetes mellitus in
the prediction of death attributed
to cardiovascular disease. Am J
Epidemiol 1984;120:670–5.
15. Benowitz NL. Cigarette smoking
and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology and implications for
treatment. Prog Cardiovasc Dis
2003;46:91–111.
16. US Department of Health and
Human Services. How tobacco
smoke causes disease: the biology
and behavioral basis for smokingattributable disease: a report of the
Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US
Department of Health and Human
Services, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, National
Center for Chronic Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion,
Office on Smoking and Health;
2010.
17. Institute of Medicine. Secondhand
smoke exposure and cardiovascular effects: making sense of the
evidence. Washington, DC: The
National Academy of Sciences,
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Institute of Medicine; 2009.
[accessed 2016 June 6].
Wells AH. Heart disease from passive smoking in the workplace. J
Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:1–9.
Malarcher A, Dube S, Shaw L,
Babb S, Kaufmann R. Quitting
smoking among adults – United
States, 2001–2010. MMWR Morb
Mortal Wkly Rep 2011;60:1513–9.
National Center for Health
Statistics. Health, United States,
2015: with special feature on
racial and ethnic health disparities.
Hyattsville, MD. 2016. Available
from:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/
data/hus/hus15.pdf [accessed 2016
June 6].
Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ,
Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ,
Cushman M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2016
update: a report from the American
Heart Association. Circulation
2016;134:e38–360. doi:10.1161/
CIR.0000000000000350.
Epub
2015 Dec 16.
Singh T, Arrazola RA, Corey CG,
Husten CG, Neff LJ, Homa DM,
et al. Tobacco use among middle
and high school students – United
States, 2011-2015. MMWR Morb
Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:361–7.
US Department of Health and
Human
Services.
Extending
authorities to all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, cigars
and hookah. US Food and Drug
Administration, Protecting and
Promoting Your Health. http://www.
fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/Labeling/
RulesRegulationsGuidance/
ucm388395.htm [accessed 2016
June 15].
24. Lavinghouze SR, Malarcher A, Jama
A, Neff L, Debrot K, Whalen L.
Trends in quit attempts among adult
cigarette smokers – United States,
2001–2013. MMWR Morb Mortal
Wkly Rep 2015;64:1129–35.
25. Benowitz NL. Nicotine addiction.
N Engl J Med 2010;362:2295–303.
26. Stead LF, Perera R, Bullen C,
Mant D, Hartmann-Boyce J,
Cahill K, et al. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation.
Cochrane
Database
Syst Rev 2012;11:CD000146.
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000146.
pub4.
27. Hurt RD, Sachs DPL, Glover ED,
Offord KP, Johnston JA, Dale LC,
et al. A comparison of sustainedrelease buproprion and placebo for
smoking cessation. N Engl J Med
1997;337:1195–202.
28. Cahill K, Stead LF, Lancaster
T.
Nicotine
receptor
partial agonists for smoking cessation.
Cochrane
Database
Syst
Rev
2012;4:CD006103.
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006103.
pub6.
29. Rigotti NA, Clair C, Munafò
MR, Stead LF. Interventions for
smoking cessation in hospitalised patients. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev 2012;16:CD001837. doi:
10.1002/14651858.CD001837.
pub3.
30. Fiore MC, Jaén CR, Baker TB,
Bailey WC, Benowitz NL, Curry
SJ, et al. Treating tobacco use and
dependence: 2008 update. Clinical
practice guideline. Rockville, MD:
US Department of Health and
Human Services. Public Health
Service; 2008.