The Open Mineral Processing Journal, 2010, 3, 25-35
25
Open Access
Use of Boron Compounds as Binders in Iron Ore Pelletization
Osman Sivrikaya* and Ali Ihsan Arol
Middle East Technical University, Department of Mining Engineering, 06531 Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey
Abstract: Low grade iron ores with impurity gangue minerals containing silica and alumina must be upgraded to an
acceptable level of iron content. Concentrates, due to their fine sizes, are not suitable to be directly charged to the
iron-making processes such as the blast furnace or the DR-plant. Hence, an agglomeration technique should be applied to
fine concentrate. The most commonly employed one is pelletizing in iron ore industry. In pelletizing, iron ore, water and
a binder are balled in a mechanical disc or drum to produce agglomerates. Bentonite is the most widely used binder.
However, it is considered as an impurity due to its high SiO2 and Al2O3 content. Many researchers have investigated
different binders, mostly of organic origin, in pursuit of finding a viable alternative binder to bentonite. Organic binders
were found to yield good quality green and dry pellets. However, they fail to impart enough strength to the pre-heated
and fired pellets as a result of insufficient slag bonding. Boron compounds free of silica and alumina are thought to be a
potential solution to overcome the lack of slag forming constituents encountered with organic binders as they are known
for their low melting temperatures as well as for their ability to also lower the melting temperatures of silicates. A few
researchers have investigated the use of boron compounds in iron ore agglomeration and found promising results which
have been covered in this paper.
Keywords: Iron ore, Pelletization, Agglomeration, Bentonite, Organic binders, Boron compounds, Colemanite.
1. IRON ORE PELLETIZING
The main raw material in iron-steel industry is iron ore.
Iron ores can be classified as high grade and low grade in
terms of their Fe content. High grade iron ores which can be
used directly in the blast furnace to produce metallic iron are
not abundant in earth’s crust to supply the need of iron-steel
industry. The exploitation of low grade iron ores is possible
after enrichment. Low grade iron ores contain a considerable
amount of gangue minerals, e.g. silica, alumina, calcium and
magnesium compounds, which require concentration. In
concentration, iron ore is crushed and ground for liberation
before the implementation of separation techniques. Liberation can mostly be achieved at a very fine particle size and,
hence, the concentrate obtained is not suitable to be charged
directly into the blast furnace or the DR-plant without converting it into suitably sized agglomerates. The most commonly employed agglomeration technique is pelletizing. In
pelletizing, a mixture of iron ore, water and binder is rolled
in a mechanical disc or drum to produce agglomerates (green
balls or wet pellets). Green pellets then undergo a thermal
process, which consists of three stages, namely drying (250 –
400oC), preheating (900 – 1100oC) and firing (1200 – 1300oC).
Pellets are produced from magnetite concentrates, hematite
concentrates, natural ore fines, artificial magnetites and
pyrite cinders. Binder plays an important role in the success
of pelletizing process. Of many binders, bentonite has
proven to be the most effective one owing to its high water
*Address correspondence to this author at the Middle East Technical
University, Department of Mining Engineering, 06531 Çankaya, Ankara,
Turkey; Tel: +90 312 210 26 73; Fax +90 312 210 58 22:
E-mail1:
[email protected] or
[email protected]
1874-8414/10
adsorption capacity and dry film strength. It is used at a rate
of 0.5 - 1.5%. Bentonite, useful as explained, is however
considered as an impurity due to its high SiO2 and Al2O3
contents. These acid oxides are known for their adverse effects on the iron-steel making economy. For instance, the
addition of 1% bentonite decreases the iron content by about
7 kg/ton of iron ore [1]. In addition, an increase in the
gangue content of the charge leads to an increase in the unit
cost of steel production [2]. In view of the adverse affects of
bentonite, many researchers attempted to find viable alternative binders. Organic binders have attracted attention as they
are known to have good binding properties. The results
showed that organic binders produce good quality green and
dry pellets. However, they fail to impart enough strength to
the pre-heated and fired pellets as a result of reduced slag
bonding [1, 3-7], which is especially more important in pelletizing of hematite ores due to lack of oxide bonding. As
such, organic binders have hitherto failed to be an alternative
to bentonite, except a few cases of straight-grate pelletizing,
where there is no dynamic pellet bed. In recent years efforts
have been focused on improving the pre-heated and fired
strength of pellets produced with organic binders. In this
context, boron compounds have been considered as an additive in conjunction with organic binders.
2. DESIRABLE PROPERTIES OF PELLETS
Pellets should have certain quality parameters, which are
mostly ascertained by the tests specified in international
standards, e.g. ISO, ASTM, JIS etc. The important ones as
follows.
2.1. Size of Pellets
At least 90 % of pellets should be between 9.0 mm and
16 mm with minus 5mm material of no more than 5%. A
2010 Bentham Open
26 The Open Mineral Processing Journal, 2010, Volume 3
close size distribution is preferred for a better permeability
of the pellet bed in the induration machine.
2.2. Strength of Pellet
The strength of a pellet is dependent on the type of bonds
produced by the binder as well as the phase changes during
induration, as shown Fig. (1). A certain minimum compressive strength is necessary so that the pellets can withstand
the compression load during transportation, drying grate,
induration machine or in a reduction furnace [8].
10000
Bond Strength
(E)
(C, D)
100
Sivrikaya and Arol
prior to firing in the kiln. The pre-heated pellets from the
grate are discharged by cascading into the kiln. Therefore,
such pellets should be strong enough not to disintegrate during cascading and tumbling in the rotary kiln. In the case of
weak pellets, dust and chips generated as a result of disintegration will cause losses in plant efficiency, in terms of both
productivity and quality.
2.2.5. Fired Compressive Strength
Fired (indurated) pellet is crushed and the maximum load
is recorded. It measures the ability of product pellets to survive handling during shipment and reduction. Pellets should
have a mean product pellet compressive strength value of
minimum 250 kg/pellet with the <150 kg/pellet fraction less
than 5%.
2.3. Tumble and Abrasion Indices
(B)
(A)
1
0.01
1
100
Particle size, micron
Fig. (1). Magnitudes of bond strength for various classes of interparticle bonds in pellets: (A) van der Waals’, magnetic or electrostatic forces; (B) capillary forces from liquid phase; (C) adhesional
and cohesional forces; (D) mechanical interlocking; (E) solid
bridges formed by sintering or crystallization of dissolved materials
[9].
Five different types of pellet strength are important in
pelletization:
2.2.1. Drop Number
Repeated drop of 9-16 mm green pellets onto a steel plate
from a height of 46 cm without any cracks on the green
balls, measures the ability of the wet pellets to retain their
shape during transfer operations. A pellet should withstand
at least 4 drops, which also depends on the number of transfer points between the balling equipment and the induration
machine.
2.2.2. Wet Compressive Strength
Tumbling and abrasion procedure consists of subjecting
product pellets (-18 +6.3 mm) to 200 revolutions at 25
rev/min in a drum. The Tumble Index (TI) is given by the
percentage weight of +6.3 mm material surviving the test,
and Abrasion index (AI) by the percentage of -0.5 mm material produced. Product pellets should have a TI of 92 - 97%
and an AI of 2.5 - 5.0% [11].
2.4. Porosity
Porosity of typical wet and dry pellets is in the range of
31 - 36% whilst it should be 18 - 32% for fired pellets.
2.5. Reducibility
Reducibility is the degree of ease with which oxygen can
be removed from pellet composition. In standard the product
pellets is heated to 900oC under nitrogen and then the reducing test gas is passed through the pellets at the required flow
rate. There are some reducibility tests and typical reducibility
test results for product pellets are [11]:
• Linder test index
: about 50%
• Gakushin test
: about 60% reduction
• Chiba test
hour
: reducibility index of 2.5 - 3.0 mm/
• V.D.E. test
: rate of reduction of 0.6 - 1.0%/
minute when the pellet is 60% oxidized
Green balls on conveyor belts and grates should withstand a certain load. Wet compressive strength is a measure
of how much load a pellet can bear and determined by applying a certain load onto a pellet until it cracks. It should ideally be greater than 1.0 kg/pellet.
2.6. Swelling
2.2.3. Dry Compressive Strength
Numerous types of materials have been considered for
use as binders in iron ore pelletizing, with an objective of
finding the material that would produce the highest-quality
pellets at the lowest possible cost. . Binders that have been
used can be broadly classified as follows;
In travelling grate a minimum dry pellet strength is necessary so that the pellets withstand the load of layers located
above or the pressure of gases flowing through the charge
[8]. A dried pellet is crushed and the maximum load is recorded. It measures the ability of dried pellets to survive
handling during the firing process. Should be a mean value
at least 2.24 kg/pellet [10].
2.2.4. Pre-Heated Pellet Strength
Especially, when pellets are produced with the grate-kilncooler technology, they are pre-heated in the travelling grate
Pellets tend to swell during reduction; swelling should
not exceed 20% by volume for a smoother operation.
3. BINDERS IN IRON ORE PELLETIZING
• Clays and colloid minerals,
• Organic polymers and fibers,
• Cement and cementations materials,
• Salts and precipitates,
• Inorganic polymers [9].
Use of Boron Compounds as Binders in Iron Ore Pelletization
3.1. Function of Binders
Binders are used to improve pellet properties as listed
below:
• Promoting and facilitating - balling of iron ores in pelletizing drum or disc;
• The improvement of green, dry, pre-heated and fired
pellet strength;
• Overcoming the problems associated with balls sensitive
to heat in the drying stage, i.e. increase in shock temperature of green balls;
• Enabling the production of good quality pellets to be
attained at lower temperatures;
• Improving the properties of the fired pellets [9].
During the development of the pelletizing process, a
great number of organic and inorganic substances were
tested with regard to their suitability as binders.
3.2. Bentonite: The Conventional Binder
Bentonite, a mixture of clay mineral, consists of montmorillonite as the major component and small quantities of
quartz, mica, feldspar and kaoline. The basic crystal structure
of montmorillonite is shown in Fig. (2) and it has a lattice
structure arranged in layers which is capable of absorbing
great water quantities between the individual layers. On such
occasions the distances between the lattice layers increase
considerably. The mineral swells. This swelling property and
the high thixotropic behavior are the most important characteristics for its bonding capacity [8].
The Open Mineral Processing Journal, 2010, Volume 3
27
Bentonite absorbs water and, hence, controls ball growth
while imparting some plasticity to pellets. This property is
important for handling of green pellets from a point to another during processes. Upon drying bentonite gives additional strength to pellets owing to dry film bonding of mineral grains.
The main disadvantage of bentonite and other binders
based on silicate minerals is that they add silica to the finished pellet. Since the purpose of iron ore processing is, inter
alia, to remove silicate minerals from the ore, adding silica
back in the form of binder is counterproductive. This has
prompted long-term interest in developing or discovering
binders that contain no silica. Particular attention has been
devoted to organic binders, which include a variety of
carbon-based polymeric or fibrous compounds [9].
3.3. Use of Organic Binders
Many researchers investigated several alternative binders, mostly of organic polymer origin in order to reduce the
acid gangue content of pellets. Some of the organic binders
tested are Peridur®, Ciba® ALCOTAC®, CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose), starch (corn starch, potato starch,
wheat flour), dextrin, glue, molasse etc. Most of the commercially available organic binders are derived from cellulose.
Kater and Steeghs [1] investigated the use of organic
binders in iron ore pelletization using a high grade magnetite
concentrate from Sweden with a Blaine number of 1910
cm2//g and size of 72.1% by weight minus 0.04 mm. They
comparatively tested Peridur vis-á-vis Wyoming bentonite.
Their results showed that Peridur outperformed bentonite in
terms of green pellet properties with reasonably satisfactory
metallurgical properties.
Arol et al. [5] comparatively studied bentonite and selected organic binders namely Peridur CX3, Peridur C-10
and technical grade carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) with
magnetite concentrates from Divrii, Turkey. First two are
commercial organic based binders manufactured by AkzoNobel and the latter is a cellulose derivative with carboxymethyl groups (-CH2-COOH) bound to some of the
hydroxyl groups of the glucopyranose monomers that make
up the cellulose backbone. It was reported that organic binders are superior to bentonite in terms of drop numbers and
wet compressive strength. The compressive strength of dried
pellets at 400oC also found to be satisfactory. However, the
compressive strength of pellets produced with organic binders and fired at 1200oC for 120 minutes were found insufficient (Fig. 3) as organic binders do not contribute to the
strength of fired pellets.
Fig. (2). Structure of the smectite crystal. Each clay platelet consists
of three layers: two layers of silica tetrahedral and an octahedral
alumina/magnesia layer joining them. Platelets are loosely bonded
by counterions (typically sodium or calcium) between them. In the
presence of water, the counter ions hydrate, causing the clay to
expand [9].
The results of the physical and metallurgical properties of
product pellets are summarized in Table 1. They have found
that the compressive strength, before and after reduction, and
tumbling resistance of product pellets produced with bentonite were notably higher than those produced with organic
binders. Only bentonite binder was found to be satisfactory
for industry when these physical properties are considered.
However porosity and swelling of pellets produced with organic binders was larger than those of pellets produced with
bentonite. As greater porosity is known to lead to faster re-
28 The Open Mineral Processing Journal, 2010, Volume 3
Sivrikaya and Arol
Ccompressive strength, kg/pellet
600
1000
Compressive Strength, kg/pellet
duction, reducibility of pellets with organic binders was
found to be greater than that of the bentonite pellets. In addition, one of the advantages of organic binders is that they do
not contaminate the pellet composition since they burn out
with no residue during thermal treatment. They also found
that the Fe contents of pellets bonded with organic binders
are slightly greater than those of pellets with bentonite as a
natural consequence of adding no gangue.
100
0.20% Technical CMC
0.05% Ciba DPEP06‐007
0.30% Corn starch
0.05% Cytec A150‐LMW
0.50% Dextrin
0.50% Bentonite
500
10
400
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
300
Firing Temperature,
oC
200
Fig. (4). The compressive strengths of magnetite pellets produced
with selected organic binders [7].
100
0
Bentonite
8 kg/t
Peridur CX3
2 kg/t
Peridur C10
2 kg/t
Technical CMC
2 kg/t
Binders and concentrations
Fig. (3). Compressive strength of fired pellets (1200oC, 120 min)
produced with selected organic binders [5].
Sivrikaya and Arol [7, 12] investigated the use of organic
binders in magnetite and hematite pelletizing. A high quality
natural sodium bentonite from Tokat, Turkey was used as the
reference binder. A magnetite concentrate from Divrii, Turkey with a Blaine number of 1617 cm2//g and size of 65.3%
by weight minus 45 m and a hematite concentrate from
Brazil with a Blaine number of 1890 cm2//g and size of 60%
by weight minus 45 m were used. The magnetite ore analyzed 69.25% Fe with 0.97% SiO2 and hematite 66.62% Fe
with 5.71% SiO2. Based on the previous studies, they focused on the pre-heated (1000oC) and fired (1300oC) pellet
strength. It was reported that no organic binders alone can
match the performance of bentonite in obtaining enough preheated strength of either magnetite (Fig. 4) or hematite (Fig.
5) pellets. The compressive strength of magnetite pellets
produced with bentonite and organic binders were considerable higher than those of hematite pellets, as it is a well
known fact that magnetite oxidizes to hematite during induration. Bridges, through recrystallization, formed during the
oxidation of magnetite to hematite are widely believed to
increase the pellet strength [8].
Table 1.
(2)
In all studies carried out on this subject, the results
showed that organic binders were found to give good quality
for green and dry pellets. However, they fail to impart
enough strength to the pre-heated and fired pellets as a result
of reduced slag bonding [1, 3-7]. This shortcoming of organic binders is the main disadvantage because a certain
minimum compressive strength is necessary so that the pellets can survive the process steps after preheating, product
handling, transportation, and handling by the end user [8].
Physical and Metallurgical Properties of Product Pellets Produced with Selected Organic Binders [5]
Compressive
Strength(1)
kg/pellet
Compressive
Strength(2)
kg/pellet
Bentonite 8 kg/t
560
Peridur CX3 2 kg/t
Binder
and
Addition Level
(1)
Compressive strengths of pre-heated and fired hematite
pellets produced with all organic binders were found to be
much lower when compared to the values obtained with
bentonite (Fig. 5). The organic binders burn out with virtually no residue at relatively low temperatures and they cannot provide any bonds between ore grains in the pellet structure. During the hematite pellet induration, the strength increase is only achieved -in contrast to magnetite pelletsthrough crystal growth and recrystallization. This growth can
only be measured at temperatures of above 1200oC. Up to this
temperature; the individual ore grains and the pellet structure
maintain the original shape. Only at higher temperatures of
1300oC the small ore particles form the first crystal bridges
and recrystallization can be observed at 1350oC. The presence of fine-grained particles is important for crystal growth
that gives pellets the strength. At temperature above 1350oC
hematite starts to dissociate into magnetite and oxygen,
resulting in a weakening of pellet strength [8].
Tumbling Test
Porosity
%
Reducibility
ISO 7215
%
Swelling
%
TI
+6.3 mm
AI
-0.5 mm
68
94.5
5.3
15
65
8
415
43
88.0
10.2
22
65
8
Peridur C-10 2 kg/t
244
19
72.6
22.0
26
68
13
Technical CMC 2 kg/t
185
8
76.9
19.6
34
70
12
Compressive strength before reduction test
Compressive strength after reduction test
Use of Boron Compounds as Binders in Iron Ore Pelletization
29
borax decahydrate is 62oC when heated in closed atmosphere
[14].
1000
Compressive Strength, kg/pellet
The Open Mineral Processing Journal, 2010, Volume 3
Borax pentahydrate (Na2B4O7.5H2O) is a sodium-borate
derivative with 48% B2O3 and 21.37% Na2O has a melting
point of 200oC when heated in closed atmosphere [15].
100
0.20% Technical CMC
0.10% Ciba DPEP06‐007
0.20% Corn starch
0.005% Cytec A150‐HMW
0.50% Dextrin
0.50% Bentonite
10
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
Firing Temperature, oC
Fig. (5). The compressive strengths of hematite pellets produced
with selected organic binders [12].
Pre-heated pellet strength is particularly important in the
grate-kiln-cooler pellet induration system. If the pre-heated
compressive strength of pellets is insufficient, pellets will be
disintegrated on the travelling grate and in the rotary kiln. As
a result process equipment and refractory will be damaged
by the pellet dust formed and carried in gas streams. If the
problem is not rectified within a reasonable span of time,
plant operation may be interrupted and the efficiency in
terms of productivity and quality will decrease.
The fired pellets with low strength give rise to losses as a
result of the production, unwanted fines or dust during process, storage and transport. In addition, fines also cause operational difficulties in reduction furnaces. Therefore, organic
binders have not found widespread application in the industry.
3.4. Use of Boron Compounds
It appears that although organic binders hold some promises for iron ore pelletization, they still fail to satisfy all the
requirements especially those related to the strength of preheated and indurated pellets. In order to use organic binders
successfully, this shortcoming must be overcome. One plausible method is to introduce a slag forming constituent to the
pellet mix so that the strength of the pellets would be reinstated as a result of slag bonds.
Boron compounds may be the potential additive to organic binders as they are known to lower the melting point
of silica glasses. Numerous boron compounds of natural or
synthetic origin can be used for this purpose. Some of the
boron compounds tested as binder or additive in iron ore
pelletizing are; colemanite, tincal, borax pentahydrate and
boric acid.
Colemanite or calcium-borate salt is a natural boron
mineral found in evaporate deposits of alkaline lacustrine
environments. It is a secondary mineral that forms by alteration of borax and ulexite. Colemanite has a chemical formula
2CaO3B2O3.5H2O and melting point of 986oC [13]. The average chemical components of colemanite are 43% B2O3,
26% CaO, 6.50% SiO2 and 0.50% SO3.
Tincal or sodium-borate is a natural boron mineral known
as borax decahydrate and a chemical formula Na2O.2B2O3.
10H2O. The B2O3 content is 36.47% and melting point of
Boric acid has the chemical formula H3BO3, alternatively
written B(OH)3. Boric acid is soluble in boiling water. When
heated above 170°C, it dehydrates, forming metaboric acid
HBO2. Metaboric acid is a white, cubic crystalline solid and
is only slightly soluble in water. Boric acid melts at about
236°C.
None of those boron compounds contain significant SiO2
or Al2O3 which are unwanted impurities in iron pellet composition.
The iron ores or concentrates contain varying amounts
of SiO2. On the other hand, the boron compounds have significant amount of boron in their compositions. Their presence in the pellet mix leads to formation of borosilicate
glasses. Borosilicate glasses are known for their low melting
temperature. Thus, formation of borosilicate glasses is expected to take place at lower temperatures. This occurrence
would contribute to the strength of the pellets through slag
bonding [8]. Absence of acidic impurities in boron compounds combined with low melting temperature, good thermal and mechanical properties of borosilicate glasses favor
the use of boron compounds as slag forming constituents.
When used with an organic binder, while the boron compounds render the required properties to pre-heated and fired
pellets, green and dry pellets attain the required quality
through organic binders. Hence, the two together can be used
as binder in place of bentonite in iron ore pelletization [7].
Boron compounds have been tested as a binder in iron
ore pelletization either alone or in combination with organic
binders.
In one of the studies, calcined colemanite alone and
combination with bentonite were tested as alternative binder
in the pelletizing of magnetite concentrate with 64.70% Fe
and 4.22% SiO2 [16]. The addition level of binders, firing
temperature and particle size of iron ore were investigated as
operation parameters of pellets. Bentonite and calcined
colemanite addition levels were in the range of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5,
2.0% and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7%, respectively. The wet and dry
compressive strengths indicate that, the calcined colemanite
as a binder is insufficient with regard to wet and dry pellet
quality, as seen in Fig. (6). It was reported that increasing
firing temperature from 1200oC to 1350oC increases the
compressive strength of the pellets produced with bentonite
and calcined colemanite. It was also reported that increasing
concentration of calcined colemanite from 1% to 7% increases the compressive strength pellets significantly (Fig.
7). In order to obtain pellets with both sufficient wet and
indurated strength, combination of bentonite and calcined
colemanite were tested, and meaningful increases in compressive strength of fired pellets were obtained (Fig. 8).
Timuçin et al. [17] investigated the reducibility properties of pellets produced with colemanite addition. They used
itabarite ore which is 99.66% Fe2O3. The ore used in the pelletizing experiments was ground to 70.90% passing 37 m.
Different percentages of calcined colemanite were added to
30 The Open Mineral Processing Journal, 2010, Volume 3
Sivrikaya and Arol
the iron ore before pelletizing and the pellets with 10 mm
diameter were fired at 800oC. The fired pellets then were
reduced in a tube furnace at 900oC under CO atmosphere and
reducibility of pellets was calculated. The results showed
that calcined colemanite addition has a catalytic effect on the
reducibility of colemanite added pellets. It was reported that,
while the reducibility of pellets with no binder was only 92%
after 4 hours, the reducibility of 0.6% colemanite added pellets was found to be completely reduced in 2 hours, as seen
in Fig. (9). The maximum catalytic effect of calcined colemanite was at 0.6%, the greater addition levels decrease the
catalytic effect of colemanite.
6
1.8
Wet
1.6
Dry
1.4
5
Drop number
1.2
4
Drop number
Compressive strength, kg/pellet
The effect of colemanite and bentonite combination on
the reducibility of pellets was also investigated in the same
study. It was reported that the catalytic effect of colemanite
on reducibility of iron ore pellets was decreased when used
together with bentonite Fig. (10).
1
0.8
0.6
3
2
0.4
1
0.2
0
0
No binder
0.5%
1% Calcined 3% Calcined 5% Calcined
Bentonite colemanite colemanite colemanite
Binders and concentrations
Fig. (6). Compressive strengths of wet and dry pellets and drop
numbers of wet pellets [16].
Compressive Strength, kg/pellet
1000
100
1% Calcined colemanite
2% Calcined colemanite
3% Calcined colemanite
4% Calcined colemanite
5% Calcined colemanite
6% Calcined colemanite
7% Calcined colemanite
1% Bentonite
10
1150
1200
1250
Firing
1300
1350
Fig. (9). The effect of calcined colemanite addition on the reducibility of itabarite pellets [17].
1400
Temperature, oC
Fig. (7). Effect of calcined colemanite addition level on the compressive strength of fired magnetite pellets made using -200 mesh
particle size [16].
Compressive Strength, kg/pellet
350
0.5% Bentonite + 0.5% Calcined Colemanite
0.5% Bentonite + 1.0% Calcined Colemanite
0.5% Bentonite + 1.5% Calcined Colemanite
0.5% Bentonite
300
250
200
150
Fig. (10). The effect of calcined colemanite and bentonite addition
on the reducibility of itabarite pellets [17].
100
50
0
1150
1200
1250
1300
1350
1400
Firing Temperature, oC
Fig. (8). Effect of bentonite and calcined colemanite addition on the
compressive strength of magnetite pellets made using -200 mesh
particle size [16].
Sivrikaya and Arol [18] investigated the boron compounds, namely colemanite, tincal, borax pentahydrate and
boric acid as additives in iron ore pelletization. Based on the
previous studies [5, 6], they focused on the pre-heated
(1000oC) and fired (1300oC) pellet strength. The boron compounds were tested alone and in combination with organic
binders; technical grade CMC, corn starch, Ciba DPEP06-
Use of Boron Compounds as Binders in Iron Ore Pelletization
The effect of addition level of calcined colemanite on the
compressive strength of pre-heated and fired magnetite and
hematite pellets was also investigated in the same studies [7,
12]. It was reported that increasing concentration of calcined
colemanite from 0.25% to 1.00% increases the pre-heated
and fired pellet compressive strengths in both magnetite and
hematite pellets. Results showed that the magnetite pellets
produced with all the addition levels of calcined colemanite,
except 0.25%, had compressive strengths equal or better than
the magnetite pellets produced with 0.50% bentonite (Fig.
13). The contribution of calcined colemanite on the compressive strengths of hematite pellets is more pronounced
than those on magnetite pellets. All the compressive strengths
of hematite pellets produced with calcined colemanite were
found to be much greater than those of pellets produced
with bentonite (Fig. 14). These findings are expected as the
oxidation of magnetite to hematite at lower temperatures is
10
31
one of the major binding mechanisms, while hematite acquires a lesser strength through crystal growth and recrystallization [8].
10
Moisture
9
Drop number
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0.10% Ciba DPEP06‐007
0.20% Technical CMC
0.10% Ciba DPEP06‐007+1.00% Colemanite
0.10% Ciba DPEP06‐007+0.50% Colemanite
0.10% Technical CMC
0.20% Corn starch
0.10% Technical CMC+0.50% Colemanite
0.10% Technical CMC+1.00% Colemanite
0.10% Corn starch+1.00% Colemanite
0.50% Bentonite
0.10% Corn starch+0.50% Colemanite
0.25% Bentonite+1.00% Colemanite
0.25% Bentonite+1.00% Colemanite
%0.05 Cytec A150‐LMW
0.25% Bentonite+0.50% Colemanite
0.25% Bentonite+0.50% Colemanite
0.50% Boric acid
0.50% Colemanite
0.75% Colemanite
1.00% Colemanite
0.50% Borax pentahydrate
0.25% Colemanite
Without Binder
0.50% Dextrin
0.005% Cytec A150‐HMW
0
Fig. (12). The drop numbers and moisture contents of hematite
pellets produced with different binders [18].
700
Compressive strength, kg/pellet
0007, Cytec A150-LMW, Cytec A150-HMW and dextrin. In
this study, colemanite was used after calcination at 550oC to
remove the chemically bonded water. Other additives were
used as powder or solution in distilled water. Magnetite and
hematite pellets with selected organic binders and boron
compounds were produced. The drop numbers and moisture
content of magnetite and hematite pellets are given in Fig.
(11) and Fig. (12), respectively. The drop number was found
to be 3 for magnetite pellets and 3.4 for hematite pellets
bonded with 0.50% bentonite which is established as the
reference level. The drop numbers of pellets bonded with
organic binders found to be sufficient when compared to
bentonite. However, the drop numbers of both magnetite and
hematite pellets produced with only boron compounds were
found to be smaller than the reference level. Because they
contribute no strength in wet pellets due to lack of water
adsorption capacity, adhesional and cohesional forces.
Therefore the use of only boron compounds as binder is insufficient for desired wet pellet quality in both magnetite and
hematite pellets. However, the drop numbers of pellets
bonded with the combination of an organic binder and a boron compound were found to be acceptable.
The Open Mineral Processing Journal, 2010, Volume 3
0.25% Cal. Colemanite
0.50% Cal. Colemanite
0.75% Cal. Colemanite
1.00% Cal. Colemanite
0.50% Bentonite
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
900
950
1000
1050
1100
1150
Firing Temperature,
1200
1250
1300
1350
oC
Fig. (13). Compressive strength of pre-heated and fired magnetite
pellets produced with calcined colemanite [7].
Moisture
Drop number
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0.10% Cytec A150‐LMW
1.00% Bentonite
0.20% Technical CMC
0.05% Cytec A150‐LMW
0.40% Corn starch
0.05% Ciba DPEP06‐007 +0.50% Colemanite
0.10% Corn starch+1.00% Colemanite
0.05% Ciba DPEP06‐007 +0.25% Colemanite
0.10% Corn starch+0.75% Colemanite
0.50% Bentonite
0.15% Technical CMC
0.10% Technical CMC+1.00% Colemanite
0.10% Corn starch+0.50% Colemanite
0.10% Technical CMC
0.10% Corn starch+0.25% Colemanite
0.10% Technical CMC+0.50% Colemanite
0.10% Technical CMC+0.75% Colemanite
0.50% Boric acid
0.10% Ciba DPEP06‐007
0.10% Technical CMC+0.25% Colemanite
0.30% Corn starch
0.05% Ciba DPEP06‐007+1.00% Colemanite
0.05% Technical CMC
0.05% Ciba DPEP06‐007+0.75% Colemanite
0.20% Corn starch
1.00% Colemanite
0.25% Bentonite + 0.25% Colemanite
0.75% Colemanite
0.05% Ciba DPEP06‐007
0.15% Corn starch
0.005% Cytec A150‐HMW
0.15% Bentonite + 0.15% Colemanite
0.25% Colemanite
0.50% Colemanite
0.01% Cytec A150‐HMW
0.50% Dextrin
1.00% Dextrin
0.50% Borax pentahydrate
1.00% Borax pentahydrate
0.50% Tincal
Without binder
0
Fig. (11). The drop numbers and moisture contents of magnetite pellets produced with different binders [18].
32 The Open Mineral Processing Journal, 2010, Volume 3
Sivrikaya and Arol
900
Compressive strength, kg/pellet
700
600
100
Without binder
0.50% Bentonite
0.50% Calcined colemanite
0.50% Boraxpentahydrate
0.50% Boric acid
10
900
1000
1100
1300
1400
Fig. (16). Compressive strength of hematite pellets produced with
different boron compounds [12].
500
300
200
100
0
900
950
1000
1050
1100
1150
1200
1250
1300
1350
Firing Temperature, oC
Compressive Strength, kg/pellet
700
400
Fig. (14). Compressive strength of pre-heated and fired hematite
pellets produced with calcined colemanite [12].
1000 C
600
1300 C
500
400
300
200
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Binder Codes
1000
Fig. (17). Compressive strength of magnetite pellets produced with
organic binder-colemanite combinations [18].
100
900
Without binder
0.50% Bentonite
0.50% Calcined colemanite
0.50% Tincal
0.50% Boraxpentahydrate
0.50% Boric acid
10
900
1000
1100
1200
Firing Temperature,
1300
1400
oC
Fig. (15). Compressive strength of magnetite pellets produced with
different boron compounds [7].
In hematite pellets, the contribution of all the boron compounds to the compressive strength of pre-heated pellets was
significantly greater than pellets produced with bentonite, as
shown in Fig. (16). The compressive strengths of pre-heated
pellets produced with all the boron compounds had nearly
twice the compressive strength of the pellets bonded with
bentonite.
In view of the fact that organic binders render acceptable
qualities to the green pellets [18] and calcined colemanite
improve the pre-heated and fired pellet strength [7, 12], they
were used together to produce magnetite and hematite pellets
[18]. The results for different organic binder-colemanite
combination are given in Fig. (17) for magnetite pellets and
in Fig. (18) for hematite pellets. As seen, while organic
binder-colemanite combination yielded pellets with nearly
equal compressive strengths when magnetite were used
Fig. (17), the compressive strengths of pre-heated and fired
pellets of hematite were notably greater, Fig. (18).
Compressive Strength, kg/pellet
Compressive Strength, kg/pellet
1200
Firing Temperature, oC
0.25% Cal. Colemanite
0.50% Cal. Colemanite
0.75% Cal. Colemanite
1.00% Cal. Colemanite
0.50% Bentonite
800
Compressive Strength, kg/pellet
Besides colemanite, other boron compounds such as
tincal, boraxpentahydrate and boric acid were also tested
as binder by the same researchers [7, 12]. When the compressive strength of pre-heated magnetite pellets are
considered, it can clearly be seen from Fig. (15) that only
calcined colemanite added pellets had compressive strengths
comparable to those of pellets bonded with bentonite.
The compressive strengths of pellets produced with other
boron compounds (tincal, boraxpentahydrate and boric acid)
found to be smaller than those of pellets produced with
bentonite.
1000
800
1000 C
700
1300 C
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Binder Codes
Fig. (18). Compressive strength of hematite pellets produced with
organic binder-colemanite combinations [18].
Organic binder-colemanite combinations are shown by
codes in Figs. (17 and 18);
1 : 0.50% Bentonite (reference binder)
2 : 0.10% Technical CMC + 0.50% Calcined colemanite
3 : 0.10% Technical CMC + 1.00% Calcined colemanite
4 : 0.05% Ciba DPEP06-007 + 0.50% Calcined colemanite
5 : 0.05% Ciba DPEP06-007 + 1.00% Calcined colemanite
6 : 0.10% Corn starch + 0.50% Calcined colemanite
7 : 0.10% Corn starch + 1.00% Calcined colemanite
Sivrikaya [19] carried out some preliminary tests to use
calcined colemanite together with bentonite in order to either
Use of Boron Compounds as Binders in Iron Ore Pelletization
The Open Mineral Processing Journal, 2010, Volume 3
33
lower bentonite consumption level or induration temperature. The results of the tests for hematite pellets are given in
Fig. (19). As can be seen, it was possible to obtain equal
compressive strength with lower bentonite addition level to
hematite pellets when colemanite was also used at 0.50%
and 1.00%, Fig. (19).
Compressive strength, kg/pellet
0.15% Bentonite + 0.15% Cal. Colemanite
0.25% Bentonite + 0.25% Cal. Colemanite
400
0.5% Bentonite
200
100
900
950
1000
1050
1100
1150
Firing Temperature,
1200
1250
1300
1350
oC
Fig. (21). Fired magnetite pellets with 0.50% calcined bentonite
and colemanite [19].
Fig. (19). Compressive strength of hematite pellets produced with
bentonite-colemanite combinations [19].
In order to delineate the bonding mechanism in magnetite
and hematite pellets, Sivrikaya [19] investigated the crystal
change and crystal growth of indurated pellets. During heating under oxidizing atmosphere, the magnetite oxidizes to
hematite with simultaneous conversion of the cubic magnetite into the hexagonal hematite lattice. According to the
genesis of magnetite, the oxidation starts at about 300 600oC and is to be terminated at a temperature of 1100oC. It
begins on the crystal and grain surfaces [11]. This is confirmed on the magnetite pellets, fired at 1300oC, produced
with 0.50% bentonite and 0.50% calcined colemanite. The
crystal growth is better in bentonite bonded magnetite pellet
than colemanite bonded magnetite pellet, Figs. (20) and (21).
However, the crystal growth is better in hematite pellets produced with calcined colemanite than those of hematite pellets bonded with bentonite, Figs. (22) and (23). These findings can explain the greater strength of hematite pellets obtained upon colemanite addition, as larger crystals lead to
stronger pellets.
Fig. (22). Fired hematite pellets with 0.50%.
Fig. (23). Fired hematite pellets with 0.50% calcined bentonite and
colemanite [19].
Fig. (20). Fired magnetite pellets with 0.50%.
Sivrikaya [19] also investigated the minerology of the
magnetite pellets. The base X-ray diffractogram was deter-
34 The Open Mineral Processing Journal, 2010, Volume 3
Sivrikaya and Arol
Fig. (24). X-ray diffractogram of magnetite concentrate dried at 100 oC [19].
Fig. (25). X-ray diffractogram of magnetite pellets bonded with 0.50% bentonite and fired at 1300 oC [19].
Fig. (26). X-ray diffractogram of magnetite pellets bonded with 0.50% calcined colemanite and fired at 1300 oC [19].
mined with dry magnetite concentrate and given in Fig. (24)
show that magnetite is the only constituent. The X -ray
diffractograms of magnetite pellets produced with bentonite
binder (Fig. 25) and calcined colemanite additive (Fig. 26)
indicated that hematite is the main constituent. The XRD
analyses of magnetite pellets showed no new compounds. As
the addition levels of bentonite and calcined colemanite were
very low (0.5%), their differential peaks can not be detected
by XRD. These findings well confirm with earlier reports.
• Organic binders have been suggested as alternative binders to bentonite. The results have shown that organic
binders render good quality to green and dry pellets, they
have failed in terms of pre-heated and fired pellet
strength.
4. CONCLUSIONS
• Organic binders and boron compounds can be used together to compensate the shortcoming of either material.
Sufficient wet strength, pre-heated and fired compressive
strengths were obtained with the use of combination of
• Bentonite is the most preferred binder industrially but has
some disadvantage due to its SiO2 and Al2O3 contents
which are unwanted impurities in pellet composition.
• Boron compounds have been considered as a slag forming constituent which contribute to strength of pre-heated
and fired pellets through slag bonds formed at comparatively low temperatures.
Use of Boron Compounds as Binders in Iron Ore Pelletization
The Open Mineral Processing Journal, 2010, Volume 3
an organic binder and boron compounds when compared
to the pellets produced with conventional bentonite
binder.
• The use of combination of an organic binder and a boron
compound as an alternative to bentonite in iron ore pelletization can be beneficial in terms of
(a)
reducing the acidic impurity constituents introduced by bentonite,
(b) reducing the firing temperatures in pelletization of hematite ores leading a lower energy
consumption.
• Calcined colemanite may improve the reducibility of
pellet.
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
T. Kater, and H.R.G. Steeghs, “Organic binders for iron ore
pelletization”, In: 57th Annual Meeting of the Minnesota Section of
AIME, Duluth-MN, USA, 1984, pp.13.1-13.29.
V.M. Chizhikova, R.M.,Vainshtein, S.N. Zorin, T.I. Zainetdinov,
G.A. Zinyagin and A.A. Shevchenko, “Production of iron ore
pellets with an organic binder,” Metallurgist, vol.47, nos.3-4,
pp.141-146, 2003.
R.P. de Souza, C.F. de Mendonca and T. Kater, “Production of
acid iron ore pellet for direct reduction, using an organic binder,”
Mining Eng, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1437-1441,1984.
H.E. Goetzman, R.L. Bleifuss and J. Engesser, “Investigation of
carboxymethyl cellulose binders for taconite pelletizing,” In: SME
Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 1988, pp. 88-111.
A.I. Arol, G. Özbayolu, C. Hiçyılmaz, Ü. Akdemir and M.
Mamurekli, “Determination of an alternative binder to bentonite in
iron ore pelletization,” In: 11th.Turkey Mining Scientific and
Technical Congress, 1989, pp. 393-405.
Received: January 15, 2010
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
35
A.I., Arol, “The use of organic binders in iron pelletization,” Unpublished study, 1997.
O. Sivrikaya and A.I. Arol, “Use of colemanite as an additive in
iron ore pelletizing”, In: 11th International Mineral Processing
Symposium, Antalya, Turkey, 2008, pp.1121-1127.
K. Meyer, Pelletizing of Iron Ores. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: New York, 1980.
T.C. Eisele and S.K. Kawatra, “A review of binders in iron ore
pelletization”, Miner. Process. Extr. Metall., vol. 24, pp. 1-90,
2003.
S.K. Kawatra and S.J. Ripke, “Pelletizing steel mill desulfurization
slag”, Int. J. Miner. Process., vol. 65, pp. 165-175, 2002.
D.F. Ball, J. Dartnell, J. Davison, A. Grieve and R. Wild, Agglomeration of Iron Ores. American Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc.:
New York, 1973.
O. Sivrikaya and A.I. Arol, “Use of organic binders and borates in
hematite pelletization,” In: 13th Balkan Mineral Processing Congress, Bucharest, Romania, 2009, pp. 337-341.
E. Tektas, “Bigadiç ground colemanite health and safety data
sheet”, Eti Holding A.. Research & Development Department,
Turkey 2003.
A, Mergen, E. Tektas, “Borax decahydrate health and safety data
sheet”, Eti Holding A.. Research & Development Department,
Turkey 2003.
E. Tektas, T.T. Aydın and S. Cüce., “Etibor-48 (borax pentahydrate) health and safety data sheet”, Eti Holding A.. Research &
Development Department, Turkey 2007.
M.N. Körolu, “Use of calcined colemanite and bentonite as
binders in the pelletizing of Hasan Çelebi iron ore”, M.S. thesis,
Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 1980.
M. Timuçin, A. Geveci, N. Sevinç, Y. Topkaya and H. Eriç, “The
use of colemanite in steel production”, Middle East Technical
University Project No:84-04-07-00-13, pp. 100-111, 1986.
O. Sivrikaya and A.I. Arol, “Use of organic binders and borates in
pelletizing of iron oxides”, In: 4th International Boron Symposium,
Eskiehir, Turkey, 2009, pp. 251-256.
O. Sivrikaya, Unpublished results of PhD thesis, Middle East
Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 2010.
Revised: February 01, 2010
Accepted: March 12, 2010
© Sivrikaya and Arol; Licensee Bentham Open.
This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.