Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Efficient solution-processed dendrimer OLEDs

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Light-emitting dendrimers are a new distinct class of material for OLEDs. Dendrimers consist of a light-emitting core, dendrons and surface groups. Dendrimers are designed for solution coating and have a number of advantages over conjugated polymers. We report our recent results for solution processed green dendrimer OLEDs. The OLEDs were fabricated by spin-coating a blend of first generation dendrimer/host material followed by the evaporation of a hole blocking layer and a LiF/Al cathode. Power efficiencies of 50 lm/W at practical brightness levels were achieved for these structures.

Efficient Solution-Processed Dendrimer OLEDs O. V. Salata*a, Zugang Liua, A. Safonovb, N. Mustaphab, Shih-Chun Loc, Paul Burnc, Ifor Samueld, Jonathan Markhamd a Dept. of Materials, Univ. of Oxford, UK; bOpsys Limited, UK; cThe Dyson Perrins Laboratory, Univ. of Oxford, UK; dDept. of Physics & Astronomy, Univ. of St Andrews, UK ABSTRACT Light-emitting dendrimers are a new distinct class of material for OLEDs. Dendrimers consist of a light-emitting core, dendrons and surface groups. Dendrimers are designed for solution coating and have a number of advantages over conjugated polymers. We report our recent results for solution processed green dendrimer OLEDs. The OLEDs were fabricated by spin-coating a blend of first generation dendrimer/host material followed by the evaporation of a hole blocking layer and a LiF/Al cathode. Power efficiencies of 50 lm/W at practical brightness levels were achieved for these structures. Keywords: dendrimers, solution processing, OLED 1. INTRODUCTION Light-emitting materials have traditionally fallen into two main classes, namely small molecules1 and conjugated polymers2. Conjugated polymers are solution processed whilst small molecule based organic light-emitting diodes are produced by evaporation. Light-emitting dendrimers are a new class of material for OLEDs3. Dendrimers consist of a light-emitting core, dendrons and surface groups. Dendrimers are solution processible and have a number of advantages over conjugated polymers. These include being produced by a modular synthetic route, which gives greater flexibility over controlling the properties and independent optimisation of the processing and electronic properties. Also, the generation of the dendrimer gives molecular control over the intermolecular interactions that are vital to OLED performance4. Finally, both fluorescent and phosphorescent dendrimers are easily accessible. Phosphorescent light-emitting materials can harness emission from singlet and triplet excited states so that it is possible to achieve OLEDs with 100% internal quantum efficiency. In contrast, in fluorescent materials, triplet formation leads to substantial loss of efficiency. Recently reported results for a single layer spin-coated dendrimer devices demonstrated the potential of the green phosphorescent dendrimer emitter5. In another recent work we reported some preliminary results for different combinations of host and hole blocking materials6,7 in double layer devices. Here we report our latest improvements in the performance of double layer OLEDs based on the combination of the first generation green emitting dendrimer with 4,4’,4’’-tris(N-carbazolyl)triphenylamine (TCTA)8 as a host material and 1,3,5-tris(2-Nphenylbenzimidazolyl)benzene (TPBI)9 as a hole blocking/electron transporting material. * [email protected]; phone +44-1865-283713; fax +44-1865-847444; Unit 8, Begbroke Business and Science Park, Sandy Lane, Yarnton, Oxford OX5 1PF, UK Materials, Devices, and Systems for Display and Lighting, Fuxi Gan, Ming Hsien Wu, Lionel C. Kimerling, Editors, Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 4918 (2002) © 2002 SPIE · 0277-786X/02/$15.00 Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 12/02/2015 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/TermsOfUse.aspx 117 2. EXPERIMENTAL The OLEDs were fabricated by spin-coating a blend of first generation dendrimer/host material followed by the evaporation of a hole blocking layer and a LiF/Al cathode. The dendrimer (IrppyD)5,6 consists of a fac-tris(2-phenylpyridine)iridium core, phenylene dendrons, and 2-ethylhexyloxy surface groups, as shown in Fig.1. This dendrimer has one level of branching and hence it is a first generation dendrimer. N Ir O 3 O Fig.1. Structure of IrppyD ITO coated glass substrates were cut into 1” by 1” squares and patterned using standard photolithography. After the patterning the substrates were cleaned with detergent, rinsed with deionised water, dried in the oven, and finally subjected to an oxygen plasma treatment. The dendrimer/TCTA blends were typically spin-coated onto the substrates from 5-10 g/l solution in toluene at 100 to 4000 rpm to give a 20 to 50 nm thick films. The coated substrates were transferred to a Spectros vacuum evaporator (KJ Lesker) and a layer of a hole blocking/electron transporting material TPBI, 1.2 nm of LiF and 100 nm of Al were deposited sequentially. A typical device structure is shown in Fig.2. ITO 4.8 2.0(2.5) TCTA, doped with 5 to 20 wt% (IrppyD), spin-coated, 20 to 50 nm 2.7 3 TPBI, evaporated, 30 to 80 nm LiF/Al, 1 nm/ 100 nm 5.7(5.6) 6.7 Fig.2. Typical device structure and HOMO/LUMO values for the materials used. The completed devices were tested in air immediately after the fabrication. A PC controlled set up comprising a Keithley 4200 source-measure unit and Minolta LS100 luminance meter was used to gather electro-optical characteristics of the OLEDs. A CCD spectrograph (Oriel) was used to take EL spectra. 118 Proc. SPIE Vol. 4918 Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 12/02/2015 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/TermsOfUse.aspx 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The results of electro-optical testing are presented in Fig.3. (a) to (d). Fig.3. Electro-optical characteristics and efficiency of ITO/TCTA:IrppyD/TPBI/LiF/Al device a) current-voltage; b) luminance-voltage; c) efficiency-voltage; d) luminance efficiency-voltage The devices turn on at 2.8 V. The CIE coordinates for the emission are x=0.31 y=0.64 and stay virtually unchanged at high luminance . A power efficiency of 50 lm/W is achieved for these structures at 40 cd/m2, 3.4 V, and 54 cd/A. At a luminance of 10000 cd/m2 the power efficiency was found to decrease but only to 20 lm/W. The performance of a typical device is summarised in Table 1. Proc. SPIE Vol. 4918 Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 12/02/2015 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/TermsOfUse.aspx 119 Table 1. Summary of the typical device performance. Voltage, V Luminance, cd/m2 Efficiency, cd/A Luminance efficiency, lm/W 2.8 0.1 39 44 3.4 40 54 50 3.7 100 54 46 4.5 1000 54 36 6.5 10000 42 20 The device structure and energy values of HOMOs and LUMOs are shown in Fig.2. It is likely that holes injected from the ITO are transported by hopping from one IrppyD site to another. Due to the high barrier to the hole transport at the TCTA/TPBI interface a high density of positive charge is created. This high charge density results in a strong electric field across the electron-transporting layer leading to an enhanced electron injection. Electrons crossing the TPBI/TCTA interface are recombining with holes blocked on the dendrimer sites with a very high efficiency. 4. SUMMARY These numbers are comparable with the best performance figures reported for the small molecule phosphorescent OLEDs9 and surpass the best polymer devices10. We believe that these are the best results reported to date for the solution processed devices. Such high efficiency achieved for a solution processed dendrimer device paves a way to cheaper large area displays. REFERENCES 1. C.W. Tang and S.A. Van Slyke, Appl.Phys.Lett. 51, pp. 913-5, 1987. 2. J.H. Burroughes, D.D.C. Bradley, A.R. Brown, R.N. Marks, K.D. Mackay, R.H. Friend, P.L. Burn, A.B. Holmes, Nature, 347, p. 539, 1990. 3. Wang, P. W., Liu, Y. J., Devadoss, C., Bharathi, P., and Moore, J. S., Advanced Materials 8(3), p.237, 1996. Halim, M., Samuel, I. D. W., Pillow, J. N. G., Monkman, A. P., and Burn, P. L., Synthetic Metals 102(1-3), p.1571, 1999. Freeman, A., Frechet, J., Koene, S., and Thompson, M., Macromolecular Symposia 154, p. 163, 2000. Lupton, J. M., Hemingway, L. R., Samuel, I. D. W., and Burn, P. L., Journal of Materials Chemistry 10(4), p. 867, 2000. Lupton, J. M., Samuel, I. D. W., Frampton, M. J., Beavington, R., and Burn, P. L., Advanced Functional Materials 11(4), p. 287, 2001. 4. Lupton, J. M., Samuel, I. D. W., Beavington, R., Burn, P. L., and Bässler, H., Advanced Materials 13(4), p. 258 2001. 5. Markham, J. P. J., Lo, S. C., Magennis, S. W., Burn, P. L., and Samuel, I. D. W., Appl. Phys .Lett. 80(15), p. 2645, 2002. 120 Proc. SPIE Vol. 4918 Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 12/02/2015 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/TermsOfUse.aspx 6. Lo, S-C., Male, N. A. H., Markham, J. P. J., Magennis, S. W., Burn, P. L., Salata, O. V., and Samuel, I. D. W. Advanced Materials ,14 (13-14), p. 975, 2002. 7 Markham, J. P. J., Anthopoulos, T., Magennis, S. W., Samuel, I. D. W., Male, N. A. H., Salata, O.V., Lo, S. -C., Burn, P.L. L., SID Int. Symposium Digest vol. XXXIII, no. II, p.1032 ,2002. 8. Ikai, M., Tokito, S., Sakamoto, Y., Suzuki, T., and Taga, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 79(2), p. 156, 2001. 9. Gao, Z., Lee, C. S., Bello, I., Lee, S. T., Chen, R.-M., Luh, T.-Y., Shi, J., and Tang, C. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, p. 865, 1999. 10. Friend, R.H., Pure and Applied Chemistry 73 (3), p. 425, 2001. Proc. SPIE Vol. 4918 Downloaded From: http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/ on 12/02/2015 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/TermsOfUse.aspx 121