Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
If, as Boaventura de Sousa Santos (2008) and others have argued, another knowledge or other knowledges are possible beyond the imperial gatekeeping of northern epistemologies, then anthro-pology as we know it must be decolonized and transformed (Harrison 2010 [1991]). A fuller understanding of these processes can be informed by taking theoretical trajectories within the southern hemisphere into serious consideration (e.g., Connell 2007, Nyamnjoh 2011). Social analysis and especially "theory from the south" (Comaroff & Comaroff 2012) have historically been relegated to the margins of established canons—whether in anthropology or any other field in the social sciences and humanities. However, there now appears to be growing interest in imagining an alternative status quo. This trend is reflected in recent conversations framed by the concerns of world social sciences (ISSR 2010) and, in the specific case of our discipline, world anthropologies (Ribeiro and Escobar 2006). Gran...
Social Dynamics, 1998
As we approach• the millenniumn the discipline of anthropology occupies a hiighly contested terrain, a battle-ground on which scientistic, humanistic, political-economic, anld postmodern agendas are puttinlg forth conficting claimns anid vying for hegemony (Lee 1992).,Onie readinig of anithropology is that it is a part of the discredited canon conlstructed by dead white males, architects and apologists for capitalismn and imiperialism. But despite the vogue fo'r anthropology-bashing • in some circles, I believe that quite differenlt r•eadigs are possibl: and I would like to present onie here. Anthropology's br•ief history as a discipline has beenl marked by both successes and failures. It is commiionplace to say it is a discipline in crisis; but on•e could argue thiat thiis has beenl true of its enltire history. Whiat I would like to do is give you a personal view of some of its strenigth~s and weaknesses; wher•e the disciplinie has come fromT and where it is goinlg. If I have anything to add to the usual rumninations on this subject it is thiat I feel that anthropology's politics are as muchi a part of its histo'ry and future as is its bodies of method, theory, anld knowledge. The paper will draw examples from anthropology generally but the ma7in line of marchi is to use a broad overview of th~e crisis and tranisformnation in anthropology as a point of departure to examine aspects of South• African society in the first post-Apartheid years. Regarding the disciplinie as a whole mny thesis is this: anthropology is un•dergoing a tranlsformnation that is pregniant with possibilities, but to paraphrase Gramnsci: whenever the old order is dyinlg anid the new struggling
2022
What is anthropological theory and why should we care? Anthropologists develop theory to make sense of processes still unfolding and for which outcomes are unclear. At the same time, theory shapes what we notice and find important in ethnographic or archival research. What do we think the most decisive forces shaping the reality we are studying? Should we focus on culture, class, race, gender, or some combination? Theory allows us to make sense of, and coherently write about, these different aspects of reality in any topic we hope to understand and write about. In this course we will read both classic works that shaped the discipline and emerging work today—always with implications for our own research projects in mind. What is the relationship of ethnography to theory? How is anthropology grounded in social theory and political economy of the early 20th century? How have anthropologists deployed key concepts of “culture,” “social structure,” “power,” “colonialism,” or “racial capitalism” to make sense of human universals and the ubiquity of difference? How can we mobilize anthropological theory and concepts to make sense of the world—and our own research projects—today?
American Anthropologist, 1984
Global Journal of Anthropology Research 2: 7-29, 2015
This article contributes toward the recalibration of the human science disciplines within an emerging historical conjuncture increasingly free of Western hegemony enabling an “epochal shift” with the re-emergence of Tricontinental nations of Africa, Asia and Latin America, thus necessitating the reconfiguration of the geopolitics of knowledge production. The article argues for the delinking of disciplinary practice from the prevailing Euro-American epistemological hegemony currently in the throes of an epistemic panic induced by the inextricable nexus between Western power’s post-imperial detumescence and the discipline’s institutional senescence. The discipline’s adoption of neo-liberalism as its default paradigm has consolidated its surrender to the philosophical purview of “racial liberalism” and its derivative “epistemology of ignorance.” The latter’s epistemic legacy is the hegemony of metropolitan travelling theories and their credo of interpretivism that generate knowledge claims as imported theory-mediated mystifications of cultural others. The article seeks to redeem disciplinary practice from the resulting cognitive dysfunctions and moral liabilities, by proposing an alternative conception of the practice of anthropology as a field science of the human condition based on mesography as a new research ethic. Mesography is an integrative research framework for the human/social sciences in quest of historically embedded and empirically-grounded explanations of human predicaments in an axial era heralding new vectors of societal transformation. As such, it represents a “paradigmatic leap” that offers a methodological alternative to the tyranny of an anachronistic ethnography and an epistemological exit from the hegemony of an exhausted West-stream anthropology.
American Ethnologist, 2014
Throughout, Palmié applauds the metaphors with which Ortiz proposed to understand what we call cultural change, in particular the notion of cooking and constantly adding to a pot of ever-changing ingredients. He develops this idea in a diverting coda, but in the end he wonders about the utility of the metaphor. The exercise yields an intriguing comparison between saltfish and ackee and amalá con quimbombó (identified as traditional dishes in Jamaica and Cuba), even as it underscores the futility of invoking any metaphor in trying to account for cultural change. To be sure, the musings about food, cooking, and authenticity offer another point of entry into the bundle of questions the book poses. Palmié allows them to take on a little too much analytical weight, and then retracts it, returning to musing about the collective composition of Afro-Cuban religion, about which we will never again think the same way.
Social Anthropology, 2007
The ethnographic present revisited I have for a long time been discomforted by the way in which the concept of 'ethnographic present' is being discussed in methodological texts and textbooks in our discipline. In fact, I sense that the concept could be methodologically very useful. I believe that the terms in which it has been discussed have become so stereotyped that they lost any real sense of the actual history of anthropology as it has evolved during the modernist period, in the twentieth century.
Anthropology Book Forum, 2021
CLASSICAL AND CONTEMPORARY ANTHROPOLOGICAL THEORIES, 2015
It is a necked reality that theory is the core of anthropology. Theories determine the types of questions anthropologists ask and the sorts of information they collect. Without a solid understanding of the history of theory, anthropological data remain a collection of ‘exotic ethnographic vignettes’. With knowledge of theory, these vignettes become attempts to answer critical philosophical and practical problems. Thus, it is critical that anthropologists understand the theory and its historical context. Students face two choices, then, if they wish to understand the theoretical perspectives that ultimately drive ethnographic fieldwork: They can read classic theoretical articles or they can read someone's interpretations of those articles. For readers who are not well versed in anthropological theory, neither choice is ideal. As a professional discipline anthropology is a subject in which theory is of great importance. It is also a subject in which theory is closely bound up with practice. Anthropological theory may be compared to a large crossroads with busy traffic and a few, temporarily employed traffic policemen who desperately try to force the unruly traffic to follow the rules. (There are, it must be admitted, a number of minor crashes and other accidents almost every day.) Or it could be described, more harmoniously, as a coral reef, where the living corals literally build upon the achievements of their deceased predecessors. Put differently; during the approximately 100 years that have passed since modern anthropology was established in the USA, Britain and France, many general theories have been proposed, become fashionable in and sometimes outside of anthropology, have been fiercely debated and challenged, and have disappeared, often almost without leaving visible traces.
La imagen de Portugal en Extremadura: paisajes lingüísticos y discursos literarios, 2022
European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2015
Teacher professional development and inquiry-based instruction: literature review, 2023
Genealogy & Critique, 2024
Historical Biology, 2018
in: Museums.Management 1, 2022
eHumanista. Journal of Iberian Studies 58 (2024), pp. 1-20
Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales, 2023
International Journal of Financial Management and Economics, 2023
Revista de Historia Naval nº 131, 2015
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 2016
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2013
Revista Colombiana De Estadistica, 2010
Revista Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde
Journal of Psychology & Clinical Psychiatry
Physiotherapy Canada, 2013
Trends in civil engineering and its architecture, 2018