Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2020
…
8 pages
1 file
Name of the artist: Unknown Patron/Sponsor: Septimius Severus Original Location/Place: Situated at the junction of the cardo and decumanus of Lepcis Magna, Tripolitania (Libya). Actual Location (Collection/Museum): in loco. Some of the reliefs have been discovered reused in other locations in the city and some may still remain buried. Those that have been recovered are displayed in the? Tripoli museum. Original Inscription/Graffito: Unknown. Description: A quadrifons-four-faced-arch set at the most important crossing in the centre of Lepcis Magna. The core is of limestone, which is faced with marble panelling. The four pillars support a shallow dome, fragments of the coffering of which still remain in small places, and which was supported by brackets in the shape of eagles. A Corinthian column stands on each side of the four arches, numbering eight in total, each of which is surmounted by a broken pediment. Above the columns are friezes of acanthus leaves, with the space between the broken pediments decorated with erotes and garlands. Each face of the attic of the arch is decorated with a frieze relief, depicting variously scenes of triumph, procession, sacrifice and the concordia of the imperial family. Eight reliefs decorate the interior piers, whose scenes include the siege of a city, triumph and sacrifice again. The arch was discovered during the excavations at Lepcis in 1925-26, and further remains of the relief detail were discovered in fragmentary condition and reused in other buildings. Date: 203 CE to 209 CE Material: Limestone and marble Commentary: The Severan arch in Lepcis Magna remains one of the most prominent and important architectural works in the Roman provinces. Its unusual quadrifons form-four faces-spanned the junction of the most important crossroad in the city, where the city's main east-west transverse-the decumanus maximus-and northsouth axial street-the cardo-met, and its elaborate decorative reliefs reveal the new emphasis on the frontality of
Libyan Studies, 1988
This brief article outlines the history of John Ward-Perkins' involvement with the archaeology of the complex of buildings erected under the Severan dynasty at Lepcis Magna. The detailed survey of those superb monuments by British and Italian scholars has until now not received the level of publication which it merits. As that work finally goes to press, some explanation is given of the problems faced in preparing for publication the archive of drawings.
American Journal of Ancient History, 2013
In 1967, Richard Brilliant proposed that the four main relief panels upon the Arch of Septimius Severus in the Roman Forum could be identified as representing the sieges/ battles/ campaigns at Nisibis, Edessa, Seleucia and Ctesiphon . This theory is still widely accepted today. However, despite the long period of time which has gone by, there have been no satisfactory solutions to the problems with these identifications, which are still widely accepted. These problems are mainly related to various unexplained, or inadequately explained, key features. For example, there is a group of barbarians behind the siege machine in panel two (Edessa), which is out of context and panel three (Seleucia), with the only river, is identified as Seleucia, although this place was of little importance, and does not merit a place on a triumphal monument. In this paper I will identify problems with the current panel identifications and suggest ways in which these can be resolved. Although I am still relying to a large degree upon the accounts of the Severan Parthian wars in the sources (Cassius Dio, Herodian and SHA), I hope that by paying close attention to the identifying features in the panels I will suggest more accurate identifications. This paper will not only help with a greater understanding of the Arch of Septimius, but will also help to understand the Emperor’s thoughts and aims, as well as his building programme within Rome.
2013
In the Severan Period, especially under the reigns of Septimius Severus and Caracalla, there was a significant amount of new building and restoration activities in the cities to reflect the imperial prospect and propaganda. In this period, the buildings with the decorative façade architecture, such as monumental nymphaea, scaenae frons of theaters, propylae, etc. had great significance. In this I put forward some opinions about the cultural interchanges in the Severan Period according to the architectural decoration of the buildings in Asia Minor cities, especially in Pamphylia and Cilicia regions.
2014
In the monumental complex “basilica - forum - colonnaded street” of Leptis Magna in Libya there are morphological and construction principles that will mark the architecture of the third century AD, in particular the peculiar characters of Severan architecture. For the first time in the history of the Roman Empire, there is a “monumentalization” of the artistic language of late imperial age that we will find in the architectural and decorative productions of late antiquity. The research focuses not only on the cultural influences which helped to define the Severan architectural character in Leptis Magna, but also on the analysis of the forum novum1 through a new image that underline its artistic and architectural qualities as synthesis of different cultural influences. In detail and without any order they are - a general plant with some tricks hiding the different rotation of the pattern, such as trapezoidal rooms or different spans of the order; - the surrounding porticos defined b...
Collection Latomus, vol. 345, 2014
Creating Severan Rome: The Architecture and Politics of L. Septimius Severus (AD 193 – 211) examines the topography of Severan Rome and its role in Severus' political agenda. Although some elements reflect the emperor's concern for establishing his own legitimacy and the eventual succession of his sons, other aspects of the Severan program are tied to the emperor's broader programs of legal, military, and bureaucratic reforms. This book investigates major areas reshaped by Severus, e.g., the Roman Forum, the Campus Martius, and the Palatine, as well as individual monuments, e.g., the Septizodium, in an analysis of his building program.
American Journal of Archaeology, 2004
Located at the foot of the Palatine Hill, the Septizodium, a monumental facade fountain, was built during the reign of the emperor L. Septimius Severus. The construction of the Septizodium was part of a larger plan of urban development aimed at creating a monumentalized district honoring the imperial family. This plan included the construction of new imperial baths, the refurbishment of aqueducts, and possibly the layout of a new road. With a three-story high columnar facade, the Septizodium once dominated a large plaza at the terminus of the Via Appia. The Septizodium has been the subject of modern scholarly debate for a little over a century. Widely ranging opinions on the monument’s appearance, function, and interpretation have appeared over the years. After a brief review of some earlier studies of the Septizodium’s architecture, I will attempt to reevaluate the monument within the context of Severan dynastic politics. Once the architectural form of the Septizodium is established, the discussion will move to its decoration. Comparison of the structure at Rome with other monuments, particularly those with similar facade arrangements and known sculpture programs, allows for speculation about the Septizodium’s decoration. Other factors for consideration in this proposal are the monument’s urban setting and its role in the dynastic politics of the emperor Severus. Understanding the architecture, urban context, and possible decoration of the Septizodium leads to the conclusion that the monument had great significance within the building program of the emperor L. Septimius Severus.
Edmond Courbaud (1868-1927) here repeats and sometimes disputes some of Petersen’s earliest ideas that are even less successful than his book. Courbaud retains the idea that the Ara Pacis had only one doorway, not two, and that panels from the Ara Pietatis belonged to it. It is amusing to see him explain the difficulties von Duhn could not resolve. I do share Courbaud’s view that the event was a real event and accurately depicted by the sculptors. This book was released in 1899, so prior to the discovery of the other half of the front panel that depicts Numa sacrificing (Aeneas if you are old-fashioned). Likewise, the discovery of Augustus had not yet occurred, so scholars were pondering if the real Agrippa was actually Augustus (Milani 1891, Petersen 1894, Amelung 1897) or Julius Caesar’s genius. The fact that the Ara Pacis was painted did not occur to Courbaud, nor to anyone else before 2006. I am fairly sure I am the first to propose that the Ara Pacis was painted, an idea the Museo dell’ Ara Pacis now employs (without attributing me).
Academic Quarter, 2024
Inca - Peru. 3000 Ans d'Histoire, 1990
Learning, Media and Technology, 2022
En Méndez-Martínez, J.A. (Coord.). Investigación, innovación y transferencia del conocimiento: experiencias y nuevas metodologías en Ciencias y Humanidades. (Cap. 3, pp. 78-98). Madrid: Dykinson, 2023., 2023
Publicado en la serie Theologie der Einen Welt editada por el Missionswissenschaftliches Institut Missio, Aachen, Alemania (November 2017).
American Journal of Health Research , 2024
Setúbal Arqueológica, 2016
American Journal of Homeopathic Medicine, 2010
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, 2020
African Journal of Microbiology Research, 2015
European Journal of Medical Research, 2017
Frontiers in Earth Science, 2023
Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2020
Estudos em Comunicação, 2018
The Breast Journal, 2009