Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Nurse Practitioners: Remaining True to Nursing

2016, The Journal for Nurse Practitioners

AI-generated Abstract

The paper discusses the evolving professional boundaries between nursing and medicine, particularly focusing on nurse practitioners (NPs). It highlights the dual role NPs play, blending nursing and medical practices while maintaining their identity as nurses. The Australian College of Nurse Practitioners is also introduced as a key organization advocating for nursing practice and health care access, emphasizing the importance of nursing philosophy in NP roles.

From the College President Nurse Practitioners: Remaining True to Nursing The mission of the Australian College of Nurse Practitioners is to serve as the national peak organization for nurse practitioners advancing nursing practice and access to health care. Our vision is to:  influence health care policy through advocacy, consumer engagement, and research;  instill nurse practitioner knowledge, competency, and capability through access to quality education; and  facilitate the development of a community of professional practice. The ACNP is governed by an elected board of directors composed of an executive committee and eight state directors, a patron, and two co-opted members. ACNP National Office PO Box 637 North Sydney, NSW 2059 Australia Phone: +61 2 9016 4349 Fax: +61 2 9954 0666 [email protected] acnp.org.au Executive Committee President Chris Raftery, MNSc(NP) Vice President Grainne Lowe, PhD, NP, FACNP Secretary Helena Halton, MNP Treasurer Robin Moon, MN(NP), FFACNP Co-Opted Member Jane O’Connell, PhD, NP, FFACNP Co-Opted Member Juliane Samara, MN(NP) Co-Opted Member Helen Gosby, MN, NP, FFACNP Board of Directors Australian Capital Territory Kate Maher, MN(NP) New South Wales Anne Moehead, OAM, NP, MMH, FACNP Northern Territory Lyn Byers, MNP Queensland Lee Poole , MNPractS, NP South Australia Luke Christofis, MNP, FFACNP Tasmania Lisa Spoule, MNSc(NP) Victoria Kathleen Tori, MN(NP), FACNP T he professional practice boundaries between nursing and medicine are no longer clear-cut. This is especially true for nurse practitioners (NPs) where the crossing of professional boundaries is an inevitable consequence of their clinical roles evolving into the traditional medical-centric treatment model. The reframing of clinical practice in which nurses undertake tasks previously aligned to the medical profession is not a new phenomenon. Nurses have been advancing their clinical skills and knowledge for many years, and the evolution has seen as a significant shift from the traditional model of nursing; purposefully and transiently moving from the nursing paradigm into the medial model. To imply that the tasks undertaken by the NPs have shifted nursing to curative focused medicine would be an inaccurate description of their role. It is not a case of two separate health care domains with one profession simply taking over the tasks and interventions from the other. The NP role is a blending of two practice paradigms. So does this mean that NPs have departed from the traditional values and ethos that underpin the nursing profession? Do they still align themselves with nursing? The simple answer is that NPs have a duality of focus and, as such while appearing to practice in contradiction to the nursing paradigm NPs have the knowledge and skills that are unique only to nursing. In essence NPs want to be known as nurses first and foremost, and for their nursing practice, and not their ability to perform medically-orientated tasks and procedures previously only performed by medical practitioners. Fundamentally, nursing philosophy informs NP practice. Chris Raftery, National President Guest Co-Author e Kathleen Tori, National Board Director 1555-4155/16/$ see front matter © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2016.07.024 Western Australia Clinton Fonceca, MNP 574 The Journal for Nurse Practitioners - JNP Volume 12, Issue 8, September 2016