Academia.eduAcademia.edu

What is the Dependent Variable in Corporate Governance Research?

2008, Corporate Governance: An International Review

AI-generated Abstract

This discussion focuses on identifying the dependent variable in corporate governance research, examining seven articles that study various governance practices and outcomes worldwide. It highlights the differences in dependent variables across studies, particularly noting the lack of a consistent dependent variable. Key findings suggest that while board composition is a recurring theme, the ultimate goal remains finding a global theory of corporate governance.

ii CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Editorial What is the Dependent Variable in Corporate Governance Research? I n this issue, there are seven articles that study corporate governance practices and outcomes all over the world. While there are many interesting and useful insights that can be drawn from these studies, I would like to focus on one in particular – namely, what is the dependent variable in corporate governance research? In the first article, Li and Harrison explore the relationship between national culture and the composition of boards of directors in fifteen different governance environments. Consequently, their dependent variable is board of director composition. Next, van Veen and Elbertsen break new ground by seeking to understand the relationship between “governance regimes” and the nationality diversity on the corporate boards operating in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Both of these studies demonstrate that national context influences board composition, which is a group-level phenomena. The remaining five articles all focus on firm-level effects of corporate governance. Specifically, Ting, Sin-Hui and ChienLiang explore the relationship between default risk and the issuance of audit opinions within a prominent emerging market – China. Mulcahy and Donnelly examine board structure and corporate ownership and their respective impacts on voluntary disclosure of information by firms oper- Volume 16 Number 5 September 2008 ating in Ireland. Chen adds to the conversation by examining how industry context influences the relationship between board structure and cash holdings in the United States. Then, Jamali, Sadieddine and Rabbath seek to unpack the relationship between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility for a number of firms in Lebanon. Finally, Guedri and Hollandts provide new insights into the relationship between employee ownership and firm performance. While all of these articles are valuable and appropriate, it is interesting to note that there is no clear dependent variable consistently explored across these seven articles. One could argue that the first two articles both explore board composition, but it is important to note that each article examines different aspects of board composition. Furthermore, some might even argue that the key dependent variable of interest involves national outcomes, such as national productivity, distributional equity in wealth, environmental sustainability, and even level of human development. In sum, corporate governance scholars are still trying to clarify what the specific dependent variable (or variables) should be. We look forward to future research which can move us closer to our ultimate goal, which is a global theory of corporate governance. I commend these articles for your consideration. © 2008 The Author Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00711.x