Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2008, Corporate Governance: An International Review
…
1 page
1 file
AI-generated Abstract
This discussion focuses on identifying the dependent variable in corporate governance research, examining seven articles that study various governance practices and outcomes worldwide. It highlights the differences in dependent variables across studies, particularly noting the lack of a consistent dependent variable. Key findings suggest that while board composition is a recurring theme, the ultimate goal remains finding a global theory of corporate governance.
Sustainability, 2021
This study examines the effect of foreign boards on corporate social responsibility, exploring the issues of two-tier board systems (boards of directors and boards of commissioners). Using data for manufacturing firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange over the sample period of 2017–2019, the results suggest that a foreign board engages more in corporate social responsibility activities. Our key finding remains robust with respect to all foreign board measures (foreign ownership, foreign board members, foreign directors, foreign commissioners, foreign CEO, and foreign chairperson) and to alternative estimation methods, and pass a series of endogeneity checks. We established the causal effect from foreign boards to CSR, supporting institutional theory and contesting agency theory.
Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2011
Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition
Nowadays, literature and practitioners, from a theoretical and empirical focus, agree that corporate governance efficiency is essential to achieve the long-term sustainability of firms and institutions. This issue of the journal marks another step in this area, providing an interdisciplinary dialogue on diversity in corporate governance practices.
Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2007
We examine hypothesised links between the board of directors and firm performance as predicted by the three predominant theories in corporate governance research, namely agency theory, stewardship theory and resource dependence theory. By employing a pattern matching analysis of seven cases, we are able to examine the hypothesised link between board demography and firm performance expected under each theory. We find that while each theory can explain a particular case, no single theory explains the general pattern of results. We conclude by endorsing recent calls for a more process-orientated approach to both theory and empirical analysis if we are to understand how boards add value.
Journal of Governance and Regulation, 2021
2008
Available online 4 April 2008 How is corporate governance measured? What is the relationship between corporate governance and performance? This paper sheds light on these questions while taking into account the endogeneity of the relationships among corporate governance, corporate performance, corporate capital structure, and corporate ownership structure. We make three additional contributions to the literature: First, we find that better governance as measured by the Gompers, Ishii, and Metrick [Gompers, P.A., Ishii, J.L., and Metrick, A., 2003, Corporate governance and equity prices, Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1), 107–155.] and Bebchuk, Cohen and Ferrell [Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., and Ferrell, A., 2004, What matters in corporate governance?, Working paper, Harvard Law School] indices, stock ownership of boardmembers, and CEO-Chair separation is significantly positively correlated with better contemporaneous and subsequent operating performance. Second, contrary to claims in...
Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2013
2010
Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution , reselling , loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
2020
This chapter introduces the Research Handbook on Comparative Corporate Governance and surveys several of the central themes addressed in the book. Most corporate governance research deals with the interaction between board members, officers, and shareholders, primarily in large, publicly traded corporations. Considerable volumes of literature thus are preoccupied with reducing conflicts of interest between shareholders and management, and consequently minimizing agency cost, thus vindicating the narrow finance perspective. Given the predominance of controlling shareholders around the globe, the literature increasingly focuses acutely on conflicts between controlling and minority shareholders. In a comparative or international context, research also often addresses all groups whose interests are affected by corporate activities and who have some degree of influence on corporations, such as creditors and employees. The book attempts to take a broad perspective. It deals with interacti...
As part of corporate governance theory, this article studies the relationship between the board of directors and the firm's performance from the angle of the R&D investment level in the international context. Our model seeks to show if the R&D investment level acts as a mediating variable between the internal mechanism of corporate governance and performance. This effect is sensitive to the national systems of governance. This empirical study is based on a sample of 174 U.S. and 179 Japanese firms for the period 2008-2012. The results of the linear regressions conducted showing the relationship between, on the one hand, the internal administrator and the non-dual structure, and on the other hand, the firm's performance, meditated by the firm's R&D investment-level.
Idiosynkrasie. Neue Wege ihrer Beschreibung, ed. Lühr, R., 2016
Studia Gilsoniana, 2024
IJCSIS Vol 17 No 4 April Issue, 2019
Artistic Heritage of the Serbian People in Kosovo and Metohija, history, identity, vulnerability, protection, 2017
Hanan Humaira, 2020
International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 2018
Cienc. Rural, 2003
https://www.ijhsr.org/IJHSR_Vol.13_Issue.9_Sep2023/IJHSR-Abstract07.html, 2023
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2006
Dr.Chandramouli, 2021
Diário de Notícias, 2008
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2009
Journal of Functional Foods, 2017
The KIPS Transactions:PartB, 2010
Journal of Materials Science Letters, 1996
Journal of Law and Religion, 2007