Markets, Globalization &
Development Review
Volume 4
Number 1
Article 3
2019
Can Luxury Fashion Provide a Roadmap for Sustainability?
Zeynep Ozdamar-Ertekin
Izmir University of Economics
Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr
Part of the Fashion Business Commons, and the Marketing Commons
Recommended Citation
Ozdamar-Ertekin, Zeynep (2019) "Can Luxury Fashion Provide a Roadmap for Sustainability?," Markets,
Globalization & Development Review: Vol. 4: No. 1, Article 3.
DOI: 10.23860/MGDR-2019-04-01-03
Available at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr/vol4/iss1/3https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr/vol4/
iss1/3
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion
in Markets, Globalization & Development Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@URI. For more
information, please contact
[email protected].
Can Luxury Fashion Provide a Roadmap for Sustainability?
This article is available in Markets, Globalization & Development Review: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr/vol4/
iss1/3
Ozdamar-Ertekin: Luxury Fashion and Sustainability
Can Luxury Fashion Provide a Roadmap for
Sustainability?
Introduction
Most widely used definition of sustainability is ‘meeting the needs of the
present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet
their own needs’ (Brundtland Report 1987, p. 8). Therefore, sustainability
can be considered as “an activity that can be continued indefinitely without
causing harm” (Joy et al. 2012 p. 274), incorporating economic
profitability, respect for the environment and social responsibility (Kapferer
and Michaut-Denizeau 2014). In the area of fashion, Fletcher (2012)
defines sustainable fashion as “fashion that fosters ecological integrity and
social quality through products, practices of use and relationships”.
However, fashion industry is one of the prominent industries in the world
with critical negative impacts on the social and ecological environments
(Beard 2008; Fletcher 2008; Jia et al. 2015; McRobbie 1997; Morgan and
Birtwistle 2009). It is among the most polluting and contaminating
industries due to the heavy use of chemicals and extensive use of nonrenewable resources (Pedersen and Andersen 2015). Due to tragedies
such as the Rana Plaza collapse in Bangladesh on April 24, 2013, killing
over 1,100 garment workers and injuring more than 2,200, and
documentaries like The True Cost, which reveals the dark side of the fast
fashion industry (Ozdamar-Ertekin 2017), consumers have become more
conscious about their purchases. More and more consumers nowadays
criticize the production of large amounts of low-cost products to stimulate
excessive consumption. They question the people and the processes
involved in the making of their clothes; and demand higher transparency of
fashion businesses’ operations (Arrigo 2015).
In line with the growing consumer passion for sustainability issues,
sustainability and ethical conduct have begun to matter in fashion industry
over the past decade (Moisander and Personen 2002). On the other hand,
fashion constitutes a very complex and fragmented industry, where artisan
tailors, haute couture, multinational fashion retailers and luxury
corporations co-exist (Arrigo 2015). The currently dominant model, which
is "fast fashion," refers to low-cost clothing collections that imitate the
current luxury fashion trends (Joy et al. 2012 p. 273). Therefore, fast
fashion retailers help consumers who aspire to wear luxury fashion brands
but cannot afford them, to fulfill their desires by offering them similar styles
1
Published by DigitalCommons@URI, 2019
1
Markets, Globalization & Development Review, Vol. 4 [2019], No. 1, Art. 3
at affordable prices. However, companies started to realize that this
affordable and trend-sensitive fashion, while being profitable, also raises
ethical and environmental concerns (Aspers and Skov 2006; OzdamarErtekin and Atik 2015). Hence, the pillars of fast fashion, which are speed,
affordability, change, disposable trends and aesthetic fads, contradict with
sustainability goals and practices (Ozdamar-Ertekin and Atik 2015).
Luxury fashion, on the other hand, emphasizes longevity, durability,
authenticity, unique design aesthetic, craftsmanship and quality (Fionda
and Moore 2009; Hennings et al. 2013; Joy et al. 2012) and can thereby
be better associated with sustainability. Therefore, researchers have
begun to address the relationship between sustainability and luxury
fashion (e.g. Achabou and Dekhili 2013; Arrigo 2015; Godart 2015; Godart
and Seong 2017; Hennigs et al. 2013). In this regard, the aim of this
conceptual paper is to discuss if luxury fashion brands and retailers can
overcome some of the problems that fast fashion creates and if they can
initiate change towards a more sustainable fashion system by fostering
values of sustainability. In the following sections, the paper first discusses
the relationship between fashion and sustainability and assesses how the
values of luxury fashion align with sustainability. It provides examples of
luxury fashion brands that both support and contradict sustainability goals
and principles. Then, it addresses the challenges and skepticism about the
relationship of luxury fashion and sustainability. To conclude, on the basis
of conflicting views, the study critically evaluates the role of luxury fashion
towards a better and a more sustainable fashion system.
Fashion and Sustainability
Due to the socio-environmental problems, sustainability has received more
and more attention in the last decades. It has become a vital aspect for
businesses as companies became target for public criticism and
accusations. Therefore, there is an increasing pressure to fulfill social and
environmental responsibilities, along with achieving economic goals
(Arrigo 2015). The fashion industry has become more serious about
sustainability as well.
“We've entered 2019 with a marketplace hungry to create a more
environmentally-conscious fashion landscape and, ultimately, to
design a sustainable end-to-end retail economy” (Lewittes 2019).
Many companies started to shift towards more environmentally
friendly materials and reduce the amount of toxins in their manufacturing
2
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr/vol4/iss1/3
DOI: 10.23860/MGDR-2019-04-01-03
2
Ozdamar-Ertekin: Luxury Fashion and Sustainability
processes. Ethical fashion movements, such as ‘Slow Fashion’, have
appeared along with sustainable considerations (Kim et al. 2013). Greater
transparency and more socially responsible approaches across the whole
supply chain have become more common (Strategic Direction 2017).
Clothing brands started to take actions to support corporate sustainability
such as the creation of sustainability work teams, or the development of
sustainability programs, and the publication of sustainability reports
(Kozlowski et al. 2015). In fact, corporate sustainability has emerged as a
new managerial model based on stakeholder relationships and the
capacity to integrate economic, social and environmental issues into
strategic business operations (Perrini and Vurro 2010).
Shannon Lohr, who launched her sustainable fashion startup
accelerator Factory45 in 2014, explains how sustainability has evolved in
the fashion industry since 2010. "In 2010, there were very few consumers
who knew what the phrase 'sustainable fashion' meant. Less than a
decade later, while it's still a niche market, there is more awareness
around what 'sustainable fashion' is all about" (Lewittes 2019). Therefore,
increasing supply chain transparency is vital for brands to build trust with
these conscious shoppers (Lewittes 2019). On the other hand, as the
global fashion supply chain is highly fragmented and complex, it is difficult
for fashion manufacturing to become transparent (Mihm 2010).
Furthermore, most fashion entrepreneurs and emerging designers do not
have the financial or human capital necessary to gain access to the supply
chain and sourcing management tools, which are necessary to build a
truly eco-conscious and transparent brand (Lewittes 2019). In such a
crowded fashion marketplace, it is critical to evaluate where fast fashion
and luxury fashion brands stand in shaping the sustainability conversation
and moving towards a more sustainable fashion system.
Fast Fashion and Sustainability Relationship
Fast fashion by its nature is a quick response system that encourages
speed and disposability (Fletcher 2008; Ozdamar-Ertekin 2016) and
embraces obsolescence as a primary goal (Abrahamson 2011).
Affordability, low cost, greater variety, speed of availability and constant
change of styles and trends are key drivers of success in this system. To
achieve this, fast fashion companies have decreased the turnaround time
from catwalk to consumer, which was formerly six months, to couple of
weeks (Tokatli 2008). Consequently, fast fashion has replaced exclusivity,
glamour, originality, and luxury with “massclusivity” (Tokatli 2008). As a
result, fast fashion chains have grown faster than the retail fashion
industry (Mihm 2010) and typically earn higher profit margins than their
3
Published by DigitalCommons@URI, 2019
3
Markets, Globalization & Development Review, Vol. 4 [2019], No. 1, Art. 3
traditional fashion retail counterparts (Sull and Turconi 2008). On the other
hand, the fast fashion business model nowadays faces ethical and
environmental challenges, such as massive use of natural resources and
chemicals damaging the environment, increasing textile waste, and limited
transparency of the global supply chain (Beard 2008; Biehl-Missal 2013;
Fletcher 2008; Godart 2015; McRobbie 1997; Morgan and Birtwistle 2009;
Ozdamar-Ertekin and Atik 2015; Ozdamar-Ertekin 2016).
Even though there are barriers in embracing sustainable fashion
and many consumers still value quantity over ethical considerations
(Niinimaki 2010), fashion industry is trying to meet the sustainability trend
(Godart 2015). Even the fast fashion companies have begun to evaluate
the total environmental impact of their goods and some started to re-cycle
materials or products, working towards a closed loop system (Arrigo
2015). For example, on its company website, H&M declares to work
towards a 100% circular business model, which is about developing
solutions to extend lifespan of products (H&M 2017). Similarly, Inditex in
its 2017 annual report explains its Closing the Loop program, which seeks
to extend the useful life of textile products, encouraging their reuse and
recycling (Inditex Annual Report 2017). Furthermore, both H&M’s
“Conscious Collection” and Zara’s “Join Life” Collections are offered along
their fast fashion lines. Even though these big fast fashion retailers started
to take action regarding sustainability, there is still skepticism towards their
intentions that these actions are mainly to avoid public scrutiny in order to
prevent potential economic losses or to create new business opportunities
(Ozdamar-Ertekin and Atik 2015). For instance, H&M, which is one of the
leading high street brands on sustainability, supporting recycling,
environmentally-friendly materials and climate positive change, was
exposed in 2017 for burning 12 tons of unsold clothing since 2013. In
March 2018, when it was reported that H&M was struggling again with
$4.3 billion worth of unsold stock, the brand told the New York Times that
the plan was to reduce prices to move the stock, encouraging consumers
to buy more (Pinnock 2018).
Consequently, even though the fast fashion companies can copy
luxury products, they are less able to meet high ethical standards in
sourcing, manufacturing, and distribution, and are less likely to have repair
and upgrade services (Joy et al. 2012). As Orsola de Castro (2015), the
designer who founded the luxury upcycling label From Somewhere in
1997 states, the current industry based on mass consumption and
overproduction has grown far away from the intrinsic values of fashion,
especially since this trend for aggressive growth, mass production and fast
fashion took over in the early 1980s. Therefore, it is crucial to assess if
4
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr/vol4/iss1/3
DOI: 10.23860/MGDR-2019-04-01-03
4
Ozdamar-Ertekin: Luxury Fashion and Sustainability
luxury fashion is more closely related to the actual, intrinsic values of
fashion, which according to de Castro are originality, creativity, heritage,
artistry, passion, skills and bravery (Orsola de Castro 2015).
Luxury Fashion as a Potential Solution for Sustainability
In response to the rising consumer demand for sustainable luxury, luxury
managers have to enhance the value of luxury brands with respect to
superior environmental and social performance (Hennings et al. 2013).
Similarly, Kapferer (2010) suggests a deeper examination of luxury and
sustainable development to show how luxury and sustainability can
converge at least on certain aspects. Therefore, the paper first evaluates
the principles and values of luxury that align with sustainability and
provides examples of luxury fashion brands that act as initiators of change
in supporting sustainability. Then, it discusses the aspects of luxury that
contradict with sustainability and the barriers and challenges that luxury
fashion brands face with regards to sustainability.
Aligning Values of Luxury Fashion and Sustainability
Consumers often equate luxury fashion with high price, superior quality,
prestige and exclusivity (Strategic Direction 2017). Similarly, Danziger
(2016) summarizes the essential values of a luxury brand as superior
performance, craftsmanship, exclusivity, innovation, sense of place and
time, sophistication and design aesthetic, creative expression, relevance,
heritage and responsibility. In the following section, the paper evaluates
how some of these values align with principles of sustainability.
The aspiration for high quality and superior durability of luxury
brands reveals the affiliation between luxury and sustainability (Hennings
et al. 2013). Luxury designers and brands are often associated with
sustainability because in general luxury products are higher in quality and
can be used for longer. Luxury products, such as luxury bags and jewelry,
are often inherited through generations (Wiedmann et al. 2007, 2009) and
they last for a long time depending on their high quality standards
(Hennings et al. 2013). Therefore, durability, which is the core of
sustainable development, is also an important aspect of luxury (Kapferer
2010). As sustainability is the ability to continue or be continued for a long
time (Oxford Dictionary), longevity is embedded in its definition. Longevity
of luxury products is an indication that sustainability is a fundamental
attribute (Strategic Direction 2017). As Danziger (2016) states, luxury
brands are both timely and timeless, transcending time from the past to
the future. Therefore, longevity and long-term value should be an inherent
5
Published by DigitalCommons@URI, 2019
5
Markets, Globalization & Development Review, Vol. 4 [2019], No. 1, Art. 3
part of luxury fashion as people buy less of luxury items and keep them for
longer. Some consumers consider luxury items as massive investment
pieces that they adore (Arrigo 2015). Furthermore, consumers demanding
more information about sourcing and manufacturing or consumers who
demand unique pieces with higher quality are likely to pay a higher price.
On the other hand, when buying fast fashion items consumers often
compromise on quality, which undermines sustainability. As Joy et al.
underline “durability in fast fashion apparel is the kiss of death” (2012,
p.288). Fast fashion companies target a limited product life span. This
‘throwaway’ logic of fast fashion conflicts with sustainability and long-term
perspective (Arrigo 2015). Because of their concern for longevity,
durability and quality, luxury fashion brands can actually counteract the
disposability and waste problem that fast fashion creates.
Furthermore, the ‘dreamlike quality’ of luxury products is often
related to craft, authenticity and heritage. Joy et al. (2012) state that this
‘dreamlike quality’ originates from craft ateliers, where generations of
artisans have created one-of-a-kind products. Similarly, Tungate (2009)
explains that ‘craft’ signifies highly skilled labor, making unique items,
which are accessible to only selected customers. For instance, Hermes’
affluent customers wait for several years to buy a particular bag. The
history and heritage of a luxury brand also bring out an element of
authenticity (Fionda and Moore 2009). Luxury brands are associated with
endurance and heritage, indicating that they are not simply influenced by
the latest fashion fads, but focus on adapting traditions to create products
that will last, maintaining the brand’s heritage into the future (Bendell and
Kleanthous 2007). This artisanal quality and heritage of luxury brands can
be associated with sustainability, as consumers do not want to throw away
an item that is designed to become timeless. Therefore, luxury brands can
become the leaders in sustainability because of their emphasis on this
artisanal quality, heritage and craftsmanship (Joy et al 2012).
On the other hand, luxury companies have the problem to preserve
the artisanship skills over time. Therefore, they have begun to invest in
sustainable programs or build artisan schools to train employees in order
to safeguard the artistic abilities of their personnel. For example, Brunello
Cucinelli founded the "School of Craftsmanship" in Solomeo, where
attendants learn mending, cutting and assembly, tailoring (Arrigo 2015).
LVMH has created the Institut des Métiers d’Excellence in 2014 to ensure
the transmission of its unique savoir-faire and promote careers in
traditional craftsmanship métiers among young generations (LVMH
website). Similarly, numerous Kering brands offer training programs to
sustain some technical schools of craftsmanship (Arrigo 2015). By
6
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr/vol4/iss1/3
DOI: 10.23860/MGDR-2019-04-01-03
6
Ozdamar-Ertekin: Luxury Fashion and Sustainability
investing in these artisan schools, luxury brands further support
sustainability values and principles by developing craftsmanship, creative
skills, and savoir-faire that can be passed on for centuries.
Luxury fashion is also associated with exclusivity and unique design
aesthetic (Fionda and Moore 2009; Joy et al. 2012). Luxury brands
connect with customers by making them feel special and unique (Danziger
2016). For many, luxury products embody a meaning and a story, which
the fast fashion items often lack as they are regarded as throw away and
stand for quick, available and cheap clothing. Whereas, luxury is
considered aspirational, something that you cannot buy all the time; you
need to save up for it. It has to be rare and exquisite, as it is often
manufactured in small and limited quantities. This approach is contrary to
the mass production of fast fashion retailers. Therefore, owning an
exclusive, unique item from a luxury brand is both an aspirational dream
and a desire. The notion of exclusivity and being accessible to only a
selected few also signifies status (Joy et al. 2012). However, exclusivity
today is less about limiting access. It is about making customers feel as a
member of an exclusive community linked by shared values and ideals
(Danziger 2016). This exclusivity and scarcity of luxury fashion items and
relatively slower production cycles are in line with sustainability demands,
as their consumption of environment and resources is also limited
(Hennings et al. 2013; Kapferer 2010; Strategic Direction 2017).
Furthermore, unlike the fast fashion brands, cost reduction is not
the main concern of luxury brands because consumers are willing to pay
significant premiums for luxury brands that are expected to contain higher
levels of quality, scarcity, taste and aspiration (Hennings et al. 2013).
Therefore, luxury brands aim to create customer value through
uniqueness and beauty of luxury items (Arrigo 2015). Thus, along with
exclusivity, refined taste and beauty are important elements of luxury
products for them to become aspirational. A luxury item should reflect and
reinforce the consumer’s individual aesthetic (Joy et al. 2012). Both
Baudrillard (1969) and Wilson (1985) argue that fashion always has social
meanings and aesthetic considerations. Similarly, aesthetics plays a key
role in appeal and acceptance of eco-fashion (Joy et al. 2012). Winge
(2008) also argues that eco-fashion signifies luxury and refined taste,
taking into consideration the aesthetic aspect. On the other hand,
aesthetics has not often been successfully employed in promoting
sustainable fashion and becomes a barrier in its mobilization (OzdamarErtekin and Atik 2015). Therefore, luxury brands can overcome this barrier
and enhance the success of sustainable fashion brands by focusing on
aesthetics, refined taste and exclusivity.
7
Published by DigitalCommons@URI, 2019
7
Markets, Globalization & Development Review, Vol. 4 [2019], No. 1, Art. 3
Luxury Fashion Brands as Initiators of Change in Supporting
Sustainability
The adoption of sustainable practices often requires investing money and
thereby increases the total costs. Luxury fashion brands are more likely to
be able to cover these costs. For instance, luxury fashion brands such as
Armani and Gucci have begun to pay more attention to corporate social
responsibility (CSR) and ethical codes of conduct (Strategic Direction
2017). Louis Vuitton started the green supply chain initiative and issued a
report on its water and electricity usage. Luxury fashion groups can further
have an influence in creating environmentally friendly and ethical business
models by using more sustainable materials, reducing waste in the
production process and increasing the number of recycled items. Some
luxury fashion brands and designers, such as Stella McCartney,
Ferragamo, and Vivienne Westwood, are already making ecologically
sustainable fashion clothing and accessories (Joy et al. 2012). Stella
McCartney, for instance, is leading the way in focusing on sustainable
practices. She built the world’s first sizable sustainable luxury brand
(Rickey 2014).
Kering Group, which owns high-profile luxury brands such as Gucci,
Bottega Veneta, Alexander McQueen and Saint Laurent, is also working
towards achieving a set of sustainability targets. The Group is known for
its commitment to environmental and social sustainability. Marie-Claire
Daveu, the chief sustainability officer for the Kering Group, said that
Kering aspires to become the world's most sustainable luxury goods
conglomerate, which will also help to show that ethical brands can actually
be high fashion (Rickey 2014). François-Henri Pinault, the chief executive
of Kering, explained the luxury conglomerate’s aims towards discovering
new, cleaner, smarter, and more humane ways of delivering products
(Mower 2014). The 2025 targets of the group are in line with United
Nations goals for sustainable development, including cutting carbon
emissions by 50 percent and reducing Kering’s environmental impact by at
least 40 percent (Paton 2017). The Group further has an educational
partnership with LCF Centre for Sustainable Fashion and promotes
circular model of production in collaboration with H&M and Worn Again.
Celebrities and luxury brands can further help to raise
consciousness and promote sustainable fashion. For instance, Livia Firth,
the co-founder and creative director of Eco-Age, started the Green Carpet
Challenge in 2009 by attending the Golden Globe award ceremony
wearing a sustainable design. Green Carpet Challenge collaborates with
8
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr/vol4/iss1/3
DOI: 10.23860/MGDR-2019-04-01-03
8
Ozdamar-Ertekin: Luxury Fashion and Sustainability
different well-known luxury brands such as Stella McCartney, Alberta
Feretti, Erdem, Burberry Prorsum, Prada, Moschino, and Tom Ford, and is
supported by actors such as Cameron Diaz and Meryl Streep (Bursaligil
2015). Godart (2015) argues that endorsement of sustainable fashion by
celebrities can be a way to convince customers to pay more for better
quality products.
“We live in a culture of fast fashion and consumer consumption. I
think it is up to luxury designers to lead by example and create
beautiful, thoughtful and responsible design… If designers demand
better quality raw materials suppliers will have to make them. It is
my hope that this creates a shift in the supply chain where more
responsible raw materials are readily available.” (Melissa Joy
Manning, Sustainable designer, Ecouterre 2014).
Eco-conscious jewelry designer Melissa Joy Manning, states in an
interview that it is up to luxury designers to set an example by creating
beautiful, thoughtful, and responsible design (Ecouterre 2014). Similarly,
Styles (2019) argues that luxury brands are now leading a sustainability
shift that can spread to the whole industry, as high street brands are likely
to mimic the haute couture catwalks. Therefore, if luxury brands and
designers start applying sustainability principles, the high street retailers
that serve the mass market are likely to follow, which will prevent
sustainability to remain only as a luxury trend. All the above examples
show that luxury fashion can play a major role in the transition towards a
more sustainable fashion system.
Role of Luxury Fashion Brands in Supporting Sharing Economy
Consumers' increased visibility in social media and desire for positive
social impact increases the demand for new clothes. On the other hand,
as addressed before, consumers have become more concerned with the
industry's negative environmental and ethical impacts with the increased
importance of sustainability (Strategic Direction 2017). Resale and rental
channels provide practical and sustainable solutions to resolve this
paradox, which has led to the recent rise of the resale and rental fashion
markets (Lewittes 2019). Therefore, it is important to assess the role of
luxury brands in supporting these new channels.
“People are embracing the rent-versus-own mentality to gain
access to items they covet but could not afford.” (Shika Bondani,
founder of Front Row, in O’Flaherty 2019)
9
Published by DigitalCommons@URI, 2019
9
Markets, Globalization & Development Review, Vol. 4 [2019], No. 1, Art. 3
O’Flaherty, in his column in FTWeekend, addresses that along with
the rise in niche designers working with recycled textiles, consumers
started to turn to the resale market for something cheaper and greener
(2019). Despite the rising popularity of these channels, entering into the
circular economy is not easy. In the State of Fashion 2019 report, Jennifer
Hyman, CEO and founder of Rent the Runway explains that operating an
efficient reverse logistics model is a big task, requiring technological and
capital investments. Therefore, only a couple of large companies will
dominate the centralized rental fashion industry. The two important names
in this regard are Village Luxe, an NYC-based, invitation-only luxury rental
company, and Designerex, an Australian peer-to-peer lending platform,
which was launched in the U.S. in January 2019 (Lewittes 2019).
"Sharing at the peer-to-peer level and renting high fashion can help
retailers. We would never say 'don't buy,' but buy smarter, better.
Purchase pieces you love that will stay with you through many
wears or items that can be shared and given to friends or loved
ones." (Shanin Molinaro, Chief Marketing Officer of Village Luxe, in
Lewittes 2019).
Village Luxe allows members to lend luxury items to each other
through the platform. The company's growth shows consumers' increasing
desire to participate in the sharing. Village Luxe's Chief Marketing Officer’s
explains how the model supports sustainability. Retailers and shoppers
can focus more on each item's purpose, beauty and longevity, as access
is valued over ownership (Lewittes 2019). Apart from their ethical and
environmental benefits, luxury rental services are also more sustainable
from a cost perspective. Lewittes (2019) states that “the fashion sharing
economy allows us to reinvent our definition of cost-per-wear and look
deeper into the story behind our clothes – who, what, where and how were
they made?”
Designerex, on the other hand, allows both everyday shoppers and
fashion entrepreneurs to rent and lend designer dresses through the
platform. Designerex co-founder Kirsten Kore states that the rental
company enables customers to satisfy their desire for luxury goods at an
affordable price. Designerex enables shoppers to see luxury fashion items
as assets rather than as wasteful commodities (Lewittes 2019). Farfetch is
the latest company to enter the resale market, inviting its customers to sell
their designer handbags. Even though these examples reveal the rising
importance of resale and rental channels in luxury fashion to resolve the
problem of overproduction and thereby support sustainability, the second-
10
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr/vol4/iss1/3
DOI: 10.23860/MGDR-2019-04-01-03
10
Ozdamar-Ertekin: Luxury Fashion and Sustainability
hand market can also become a threat for the luxury brands by
endangering their ability to sell at traditional full-price venues (O’Flaherty
2019). In this regard, it is important to discuss the barriers and challenges
related to luxury fashion and sustainability.
Luxury Fashion and Sustainability: Barriers and Challenges
The relation of luxury fashion and sustainability is not simple. As Godart
(2015) argues, the current luxury fashion can be sustainable but there are
serious challenges. First, if we dismantle the term “luxury fashion,” it can
be considered an oxymoron because “luxury” is often considered timeless,
whereas “fashion” is, at least expected to be, short-lived. A luxury product
like a watch or a piece of jewelry is often worn for years and can be
passed on to future generations. However, a fashion product is most often
used for a season. According to Frederic Godart (2015), “luxury fashion”
product, such as a Chanel dress is no longer worn for years, not even
after a season anymore. Traditionally, luxury was for rich and powerful
people, but this has changed due to the democratization or massification
of luxury. Artisanal luxury companies started to face the competition of
large multinational corporations (Li et al. 2015). Considering the success
of high street fast fashion retailers, the luxury brands started to have more
collections than before and offer product lines and ranges that cater to
middle class. Luxury, which was historically aligned with sustainability
ideals (Kapferer 2010), by producing rare products of high quality, made
by hand and with respect for tradition, has come to look more like
consumer or fashion goods, made to become disposable after rapid
obsolescence (Kapferer and Michaut-Denizeau 2014). Therefore, the
current luxury fashion started to embody principles of fast fashion
(Ozdamar-Ertekin 2016) and part of the luxury industry is now acting like
any fashionable mass retailer putting more strain on sustainability
concerns. If the luxury sector targets more consumers, it might tempt
people to invest considerable amounts of their disposable income in
objects or experiences they do not need (Kapferer and Michaut-Denizeau
2014). Therefore, it is important to consider the sustainability of this new
form of mass luxury.
“Fashion is an industry that knows it’s unsustainable, and luxury is
at the top of that value chain,” (Michael Stanley-Jones, co-secretary
of the UN Alliance for Sustainable Fashion, in Williams 2019).
11
Published by DigitalCommons@URI, 2019
11
Markets, Globalization & Development Review, Vol. 4 [2019], No. 1, Art. 3
Luxury fashion brands face unique challenges given that concepts
of luxury and sustainability may be conflicting (Lo and Ha-Brookshire
2018). Sustainability is based on respecting the environment and society,
by valuing ethics, whereas luxury represents wasteful and thoughtless
consumption for personal pleasure and showing-off (Achabou and Dekhili
2013). The meaning of luxury is diverse. Luxury items by definition may
not be considered sustainable because they suggest non-essential
purchases, needlessly expensive items, extravagance, life style of excess
and self-indulgence (Kapferer and Michaut-Denizeau 2014; Strategic
Direction 2017), which are opposing to the principles of sustainability
(Hennings et al. 2013). Therefore, the luxury industry is in tension between
needing to sell a dream of excess and indulgence while assuring
consumers, all these can be done without hurting the planet. Considering
the growth rate of the fashion industry, particularly for successful brands
such as Gucci, it is difficult to reduce this negative impact (Williams 2019).
Furthermore, even though the examples of luxury fashion brands
and practices are increasing, they are still less than majority (Godart
2015). The luxury industry is perceived by experts and consumers to lag
behind other industries in terms of sustainable commitment (Hennings et
al. 2013). Luxury buyers consider luxury and sustainability contradictory,
especially with regards to the social and economic aspects of sustainable
development (Kapferer and Michaut-Denizeau 2014). High quality and
craftsmanship may allow a brand to charge a high price, but not all luxury
brands are concerned about their environmental and social impacts.
Therefore, some consumers are still skeptical about their sustainable
offerings (Strategic Direction 2017). For instance, Burberry’s annual report
revealed that £28.6 million ($38 million) worth of stock was sent to be
incinerated in 2017. Even though the news has upset and surprised the
investors and the consumers, destroying unsold stock and unused fabric is
common for luxury labels. Becoming widely available at a cheaper price
through discount stores discourages full-price sales and sending products
for recycling leaves them vulnerable to being stolen and sold on the black
market. Therefore, luxury brands are likely to destroy or burn the unsold
stock in order to protect their exclusivity and preserve their brand equity.
Richemont, who own brands including Cartier and Montblanc, also
destroyed £437 million ($572 million) worth of watches in the last two
years to avoid markdown prices (Pinnock 2018).
Consequently, consumers who were used to associate pollution
and waste in the apparel industry with fast-fashion retailers, now started to
question the luxury companies as well. From using animal skins and
cashmere wool to burning of unsold merchandise, the luxury industry is
12
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr/vol4/iss1/3
DOI: 10.23860/MGDR-2019-04-01-03
12
Ozdamar-Ertekin: Luxury Fashion and Sustainability
under more pressure than ever before to prove its sustainability goals and
practices (Williams 2019). Moreover, the globalization of luxury brands has
led to further serious problems such as the widespread availability of
counterfeits and consumer concerns referring to poor labor standards.
Facing serious problems such as counterfeiting, fast fashion, the
democratization of luxury and increasingly conscientious consumers,
luxury brands must accept that sustainability has to become their
fundamental responsibility (Hennings et al. 2013).
The main challenges for luxury brands with respect to sustainability
are to revive artisanship and authenticity and to become more concerned
with their environmental and societal footprints (Joy et al. 2012).
Moreover, the consumers need to be convinced that sustainability adds
value so that they will change their mindset about throwaway fashion. Both
the brands and the producers need to communicate and explain the
measures they are taking, so that consumers will not perceive their actions
as green washing and they will be willing to pay higher prices for more
sustainable clothes (Godart 2015) and invest in staple pieces that will last
for years. However, most luxury brands target people with greater financial
resources (Strategic Direction 2017) and if sustainability is only associated
with luxury fashion brands, it will be not be accessible for the masses and
will remain limited to a small group of wealthy consumers (OzdamarErtekin and Atik 2015). Therefore, it is critical that high street retailers also
support sustainability. In this regard, luxury fashion brands can act as role
models and collaborate with high street retailers to have sustainable
fashion brands and companies that are more affordable and that cater to
larger segments. Consequently, sustainable fashion should not only be
related to luxury.
Sustainable Fashion beyond Luxury
In the previous sections, the paper discussed both the values of luxury
fashion that align with sustainability and the challenges and skepticism
luxury fashion brands face with regards to sustainability, revealing that the
relation of luxury fashion and sustainability is not straightforward. It is true
that luxury brands are often criticized the same way as fast fashion brands
(Kapferer and Bastien 2009), especially since the democratization or
massification of luxury. However, luxury fashion can counteract some of
these problems and criticisms by strengthening the values it embodies,
which are in line with the principles and values of sustainability. They can
act as initiators of change in supporting sustainability by meeting ethical
and environmental standards, leading an example, educating and problem
solving, and creating aspirational products. They can unite ideals of
13
Published by DigitalCommons@URI, 2019
13
Markets, Globalization & Development Review, Vol. 4 [2019], No. 1, Art. 3
fashion and sustainability by emphasizing quality, authenticity, artisanship,
aesthetics and emotional value (Joy et al. 2012). Moreover, the recent
economic recession initiated a return to the initial value of luxury, which is
based on rarity, craftsmanship and artistry (Gardetti and Muthu 2015),
which can further help to foster sustainability. Similarly, as Orsola de
Castro argues, luxury fashion is sustainable as long as it ensures local
artisanal skills and handmade traditions and is maintained and passed
down through generations. Otherwise, it is a marketing tool or a trend,
which encourages consumers to buy more, discarding quality, values,
design and emotions, in favor of cheap, available, and standardized
clothing (de Castro 2015).
Furthermore, luxury fashion brands are in a better position to
pursue superior sustainability performance and achieve sustainability
goals by managing their suppliers to comply with and improve social and
environmental conditions, fulfilling the triple-bottom lines and consumer
demands for transparency (Lo and Ha-Brookshire 2018). These aspects
represent an opportunity for luxury brands to become leaders in
sustainable fashion. Furthermore, regulations, which are important to
ensure that sustainability standards and principles are met, will lead to
inevitable price increases. Luxury brands are more able to absorb these
additional costs and convince customers to pay more for better quality
products (Godart 2015). Subsequently, luxury fashion can play a major
role in transition towards a more sustainable fashion system.
On the other hand, it is also important to consider the fragmentation
of the fashion industry. Sustainability in luxury fashion, for instance, is not
the same as sustainability in fast fashion. Types of production have an
impact as well. Manufacturing of artisanal craft is different from mass
production (Joy et al. 2012). Arrigo (2015) refers to this fragmentation and
provide important insights on how sustainability is employed in luxury and
fast fashion retailers and thereby show that sustainability is not only limited
to luxury fashion. Even though sustainability has a greater influence on the
decision making of some consumers when buying luxury fashion items
(Henninger et al. 2017), there is also skepticism. Some values of luxury
and sustainability overlap but luxury and sustainability do not always relate
to the same logics. Luxury fashion is not always sustainable and
sustainable fashion is not always related to luxury. Everything sustainable
does not necessarily have be expensive as sustainability is not only about
cost and exclusivity. Similarly, Jasmine Bina, CEO of a brand strategy
agency Concept Bureau, believes that in 2018, exclusivity concept and
meaning will start to be challenged along with luxury. Health,
enlightenment, freedom, social and environmental responsibility will
14
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr/vol4/iss1/3
DOI: 10.23860/MGDR-2019-04-01-03
14
Ozdamar-Ertekin: Luxury Fashion and Sustainability
become the new luxuries. According to Bina, that is the challenge that
traditional luxury brands will have to struggle with in the near future
(Pinnock 2018).
Sustainability is about having a value that people care about, trust
and believe in. Fast fashion has taken this value away. People should
invest in fashion because they genuinely care about it. They need to get
this attitude back for fashion to regain its value. In this regard,
sustainability and luxury fashion can work together. Therefore, instead of
being regarded as contradictory, luxury and sustainability can be
perceived as closely related concepts that inspire and complement each
other (Hennings et al. 2013). The luxury brands that are traditionally based
on high quality, superior durability, and deeper value are more likely to
preserve social and environmental values (Hennings et al. 2013).
Consumers still consider these ‘true values’ of luxury significant, which
suggests that luxury brands need to promote their true values credibly to
consumers so that consumers can perceive how those values are in line
with sustainable development principles (Kapferer and Michaut-Denizeau
2014). Therefore, in order to provide a roadmap for a better and a more
sustainable fashion system, luxury fashion brands should not associate
luxury fashion with only glamour and exclusivity. They have to foster
deeper values of luxury that support social and environmental concerns
and responsibility.
15
Published by DigitalCommons@URI, 2019
15
Markets, Globalization & Development Review, Vol. 4 [2019], No. 1, Art. 3
References
Abrahamson, Eric (2011), “The Iron Cage: Ugly, Cool and Unfashionable”,
Organization
Studies,
32,
615–29.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611405425
Achabou, Mohamed A. and Sihem Dekhili (2013), “Luxury and Sustainable
Development: Is There a Match?” Journal of Business Research,
66 (10), 1896-1903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.011
Arrigo, Elisa (2015), “Corporate Sustainability in Fashion and Luxury
Companies”, Symphonya Emerging Issues in Management
(symphonya.unimib.it),
4,
9-23.
https://doi.org/10.4468/2015.4.02arrigo
Aspers, Patrik and Lise Skov (2006), “Encounters in the Global Fashion
Business”,
Current
Sociology,
54,
745–63.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392106066817
Beard, Nathaniel D. (2008), “The Branding of Ethical Fashion and the
Consumer: A Luxury Niche or Mass-market Reality?” Fashion
Theory, 12 (4), 447-68. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174108X346931
Bendell, Jem and Arthur Kleanthous (2007), "Deeper Luxury: Quality and
Style When the World Matters", WWF, (accessed September 30,
2019),
[available
at:
http://assets.wwfbr.panda.org/downloads/deeperluxuryreport.pdf].
Biehl-Missal, Brigitte (2013), ‘‘Art, Fashion, and Anti-consumption”, Journal
of
Macromarketing,
33
(3),
245-57.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146713477865
Bursalıgil Egeli, Begum (2015), "Dikkatimizi Çevirmemiz Gereken Nokta:
Sürdürülebilir Moda!" ("Have to Shift our Attention to Sustainable
Fashion"), Marka Hikayecisi, (accessed May 26, 2015), [available
at:
http://www.markahikayecisi.com/dikkatimizi-cevirmemizgerekennokta-surdurulebilir-moda/].
de Castro, Orsola (2015), “For Sale: New Fashion Terms for an OldFashioned Industry”, BK Accelerator, (accessed March 19, 2015),
[available at: http://bkaccelerator.com/new-sustainable-fashionterms-old-fashioned-industry/].
Danziger, Pam (2016), "10 Core Values That Make a Brand Luxury”,
Brand Knew Mag, (accessed October 1, 2019), [available at:
https://www.brandknewmag.com/10-core-values-that-make-abrand-luxury/].
Ecouterre (2014), “Melissa Joy Manning’s Handmade Jewelry Fuses
Luxury, Ethics, Sustainability”, (accessed September 27, 2014),
16
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr/vol4/iss1/3
DOI: 10.23860/MGDR-2019-04-01-03
16
Ozdamar-Ertekin: Luxury Fashion and Sustainability
[available
at:
http://www.ecouterre.com/melissa-joy-manningshandmade-jewelry-fuses-luxury-sustainability/].
Elkington, John (1994), “Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-WinWin Business Strategies for Sustainable Development”, California
Management
Review,
36
(2),
90-100.
https://doi.org/10.2307/41165746
Fionda, Antoinette M and Christopher M. Moore (2009), "The Anatomy of
The Luxury Fashion Brand", Journal of Brand Management, 16 (5 6), 347 - 63. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2008.45
Fletcher, Kate (2008), Sustainable Fashion and Textiles: Design Journeys.
London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
Fletcher, Kate (2012), “Fashion and Sustainability FAQs”, (accessed July
26, 2019), [available at: http://katefletcher.com/fashion-andsustainability-faqs/].
Gardetti, Miguel A. and Subramanian S. Muthu (2015), Handbook of
Sustainable Luxury Textiles and Fashion, Singapore: Springer.
Godart, Frédéric (2015), “Three Ways Luxury Fashion Can Be
Sustainable,” Insead, (accessed August 8, 2019), [available at:
https://knowledge.insead.edu/responsibility/three-ways-luxuryfashion-can-be-sustainable-4067].
Godart, Frédéric and Sorah Seong (2017), “Is Sustainable Luxury Fashion
Possible?” in Sustainable Luxury: Managing Social and
Environmental Performance in Iconic Brands, Miguel A. Gardetti
and Ana L. Torres, eds. London: Routledge.
Hennigs, Nadine, Klaus-Peter Wiedmann, Christiane Klarmann, and
Stefan Behrens (2013), “Sustainability as Part of the Luxury
Essence: Delivering Value through Social and Environmental
Excellence”, The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 52, 25-35.
https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2013.de.00005
Henninger, Claudia E., Panayiota J. Alevizou, JiaoLin Tan, Qiwen Huang
and Daniella Ryding (2017), “Consumption Strategies and
Motivations of Chinese Consumers: The Case of UK Sustainable
Luxury Fashion”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management,
21 (3), 419-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-05-2017-0046
H&M (2019), “Circularity”, H&M Group, (accessed July 30, 2019),
[available
at:
https://hmgroup.com/sustainability/Planet/circularity.html].
Inditex (2017), 2017 Annual Report, Inditex Group, (accessed August 6,
2019),
[available
at:
https://static.inditex.com/annual_report_2017/assets/pdf/memoria_e
n.pdf].
17
Published by DigitalCommons@URI, 2019
17
Markets, Globalization & Development Review, Vol. 4 [2019], No. 1, Art. 3
Jia, Peng, Kannan Govindan, Tsan-Ming Choi and Sivakumar Rajendran
(2015), “Supplier Selection Problems in Fashion Business
Operations with Sustainability Considerations”, Sustainability, 7 (2),
1603-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021603
Joy, Annamma, John F. Sherry, Alladi Venkatesh, Jeff Wang, and Ricky
Chan (2012), “Fast Fashion, Sustainability, and the Ethical Appeal
of
Luxury
Brands”,
Fashion
Theory,
16
(3).
https://doi.org/10.2752/175174112X13340749707123
Kapferer, Jean-Noel and Vincent Bastien (2009), “The Specificity of
Luxury Management: Turning Marketing Upside Down”, Journal of
Brand
Management,
16
(5/6),
311–22.
https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2008.51
Kapferer, Jean-Noel (2010), “All that Glitters is not Green: The Challenge
of Sustainable Luxury”, European Business Review, November –
December 40-45.
Kapferer, Jean-Noël and Anne Michaut-Denizeau (2014), "Is Luxury
Compatible With Sustainability? Luxury Consumers’ Viewpoint",
Journal
of
Brand
Management,
21
(1), 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2013.19
Kim, Hyunsook, Ho Jung Choo and Namhee Yoon (2013), “The
Motivational Drivers of Fast Fashion Avoidance”, Journal of Fashion
Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 17 (2), 24360. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-10-2011-0070
Kozlowski, Anika, Cory Searcy and Michal Bardecki (2015), “Corporate
Sustainability Reporting in the Apparel Industry: An Analysis of
Indicators Disclosed”, International Journal of Productivity and
Performance
Management,
64
(3),
377-97.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2014-0152
Lambin, Jean J. (2009), “Capitalism and Sustainable Development,”
Symphonya Emerging Issues in Management, 2, 3-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4468/2009.2.02lambin
Lewittes, Elisa (2019), “How Fashion Brands Can Create a More
Sustainable End-to-End Retail Economy”, Fashionista, (accessed
July
30,
2019),
[available
at:
https://fashionista.com/2019/02/sustainable-fashion-brands-end-toend-retail-economy].
Li, Eric, Wing-sun Liu, Viahsta Yuan, Elita Lam and Magnum Lam (2015),
“Democratization of Fashion: a Study of Co-Creation of Cultural
Heritage”, in NA-Advances in Consumer Research, 43, Kristin Diehl
and Carolyn Yoon, Duluth, eds. MN: Association for Consumer
18
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr/vol4/iss1/3
DOI: 10.23860/MGDR-2019-04-01-03
18
Ozdamar-Ertekin: Luxury Fashion and Sustainability
Research,
796-96.
http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/v43/acr_vol43_1019409.pdf
Lo, Chris K. Y. and Jung Ha-Brookshire (Eds.) (2018), Sustainability in
Luxury Fashion Business, Singapore: Springer.
LVMH Website (2019), “L’Institut des Métiers d’Excellence”, (accessed
August 8, 2019), [available at: https://www.lvmh.com/group/lvmhcommitments/transmission-savoir-faire/linstitut-metiersdexcellence-initiative-lvmh-2/].
McRobbie, Angela (1997), "A New Kind of Rag Trade", in The Consumer
Society Reader, J. B. Schor and D. B. Holt, eds. New York, NY:
The New Press, 433-45.
Mihm, Barbara (2010), ‘‘Fast Fashion in a Flat World: Global Sourcing
Strategies’, International Business and Economics Research
Journal, 9 (6), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v9i6.585
Moisander, Johanna and Sinikka Personen (2002), “Narratives of
Sustainable Ways of Living: Constructing the Self and Others as a
Green Consumer”, Management Decision, 40 (4), 329–42.
https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740210426321
Morgan, R. Louise and Grete Birtwistle (2009), "An Investigation of Young
Fashion Consumers’ Disposal Habits", International Journal of
Consumer Studies, 33, 190-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14706431.2009.00756.x
Mower, Sarah (2014), “Why London is Fast Becoming an Epicenter for
Sustainable Fashion”, Vogue, (accessed November 6, 2014),
[available at: http://www.vogue.com/3620949/kering-partners-withcentre-for-sustainable-fashion-london-college].
Niinimäki, Kirsi (2010), "Eco-Clothing, Consumer Identity and Ideology",
Sustainable
Development,
18,
150-62.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.455
O’Flaherty, Mark (2019), “The Rise and Rise of the Resale Market,” FT
Weekend,
(accessed
July
30,
2019)
[available
at:
https://www.ft.com/content/a7e5d5f8-7c91-11e9-8b5c33d0560f039c].
Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, “Sustainability Definition, (accessed July 26,
2019),
[available
at:
https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/sustai
nability].
Ozdamar-Ertekin, Zeynep (2017), "The True Cost: The Bitter Truth behind
Fast Fashion" Markets, Globalization & Development Review, 2 (3),
Article 7. https://doi.org/10.23860/MGDR-2017-02-03-07
19
Published by DigitalCommons@URI, 2019
19
Markets, Globalization & Development Review, Vol. 4 [2019], No. 1, Art. 3
Ozdamar-Ertekin, Zeynep (2016), “Conflicting Perspectives on Speed:
Dynamics and Consequences of the Fast Fashion System”,
Markets, Globalization & Development Review, 1 (1), Article 6.
https://doi.org/10.23860/MGDR-2016-01-01-06
Ozdamar-Ertekin, Zeynep and Deniz Atik (2015), "Sustainable Markets:
Motivating Factors, Barriers, and Remedies for Mobilization of Slow
Fashion”, Journal of Macromarketing, 35 (1), 53-69.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146714535932
Paton, Elizabeth (2017), “François-Henri Pinault, Kering Chief, on Why
Green Is the New Black,” The New York Times, (accessed August
8,
2019),
[available
at:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/fashion/franois-henri-pinaultkering-sustainability.html].
Pedersen, Esben R. G. and Kirsti R. Andersen (2015), “Sustainability
Innovators and Anchor Draggers: A Global Expert Study on
Sustainable Fashion”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and
Management, 19 (3), 315-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-082014-0059
Perrini, Francesco and Clodia Vurro (2010), “Corporate Sustainability,
Intangible Assets Accumulation and Competitive Advantage
Constraints”, Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 2, 2538. https://doi.org/10.4468/2010.2.03perrini.vurro
Pinnock, Olivia (2018), “No One in Fashion Is Surprised Burberry Burnt
£28 Million of Stock”, Forbes, (accessed August 27, 2019),
[available
at:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/oliviapinnock/2018/07/20/no-one-infashion-is-surprised-burberry-burnt-28-million-ofstock/#40dd52724793].
Rickey, Melanie (2014), “Copenhagen Fashion Summit: Seven Things We
Learned”, The Guardian, (accessed April 29, 2014), [available at:
http://www.theguardian.com/fashion/fashionblog/2014/apr/24/copenhagen-fashion-summit-sustainable-thingswe-learned].
Solomon, Michael R. and Nancy J. Rabolt (2004), Consumer Behaviour in
Fashion. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Strategic Direction (2017), "Sustainability and Luxury Fashion Products:
Factors That Influence Purchase Decisions of Chinese
Consumers", Emerald Publishing Limited, 33 (11), 16-19.
https://doi.org/10.1108/SD-08-2017-0132/full/html
Styles, David (2019), “Is Luxury Fashion Becoming A Sustainability
Leader?” Ecotextile News, (accessed August 8, 2019), [available at:
20
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/mgdr/vol4/iss1/3
DOI: 10.23860/MGDR-2019-04-01-03
20
Ozdamar-Ertekin: Luxury Fashion and Sustainability
https://www.ecotextile.com/2019010923960/fashion-retail-news/isluxury-fashion-becoming-a-sustainability-leader.html].
Sull, Donald and Stefano Turconi (2008), “Fast Fashion Lessons”,
Business Strategy Review, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14678616.2008.00527.x
Tokatlı, Nebahat (2008), "Global Sourcing: Insights from the Global
Clothing Industry - The Case of Zara, a Fast Fashion Retailer",
Journal
of
Economic
Geography,
8,
21-38.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm035
Tokatlı, Nebahat and Omur Kızılgun (2009), "From Manufacturing
Garments for Ready-To-Wear to Designing Collections for Fast
Fashion: Evidence from Turkey", Environment and Planning, A, 41,
146-62. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4081
Tungate, Mark (2009), Luxury Worlds. London: Kogan Page.
Wiedmann, Klaus-Peter, Nadine Hennigs and Astrid Siebels (2007),
"Measuring Consumers’ Luxury Value Perception", Academy of
Marketing
Science
Review,
11
(7),
1-21.
http://www.amsreview.org/articles/wiedmann07-2007.pdf
Wiedmann, Klaus-Peter, Nadine Hennigs and Astrid Siebels (2009),
"Value-Based Segmentation of Luxury Consumption Behaviour",
Psychology
and
Marketing,
26
(7),
625-51.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20292
Williams, Robert (2019), "Why Luxury Fashion Is Walking the Runway in
Recycled-Plastic Heels", Bloomberg, (accessed September 25,
2019),
[available
at:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-08-20/gucci-andsaint-laurent-face-an-uphill-battle-to-get-green].
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), “Our
Common Future”, and (accessed July 26, 2019), [available at:
http://netzwerk-n.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/04/0_Brundtland_Report-1987Our_Common_Future.pdf].
21
Published by DigitalCommons@URI, 2019
21