Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
3 pages
1 file
AI-generated Abstract
The supporting information for M. Albino et al. highlights the chemical compositions of crystals analyzed through microprobe EPMA/WDS methods, showcasing the growth conditions and characteristics of BLFNO and LaNbO4 crystals. It provides details on the structural analysis through XRD, revealing secondary phases such as maghemite and fergusonite, along with a comprehensive dataset of crystal compositions.
Materials Science and Engineering: A, 1992
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012
Proton conductivity Phase purity Solid solubility a b s t r a c t The effect of cation non-stoichiometry in LaNbO 4 was investigated by impregnating nanocrystalline LaNbO 4 with small amounts of La 3þ , Nb 5þ and Ca 2þ oxide precursors. The sintering properties of the modified LaNbO 4 powders were investigated by dilatometry, and the microstructure and phase composition were studied by electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The electrical properties of the materials were studied by 4-point DC-conductivity and 2-point 4-wire AC-conductivity at elevated temperatures in controlled atmosphere. Minor variations in the cation stoichiometry were shown to have a pronounced effect on both the sintering properties as well as the electrical conductivity. Addition of CaO, which introduced secondary phases above 0.25 mol% CaO, increased the sintering temperature and improved the conductivity of the materials. La 2 O 3 -and Nb 2 O 5 -excess materials did not show large variation in the electrical conductivity relative to pure LaNbO 4 , while the sintering properties were strongly affected by the nominal La/Nb ratio in LaNbO 4 . The present findings demonstrate the sensitivity of cation non-stoichiometry in materials with limited solid solubility.
Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - New Crystal Structures, 2002
Phase equilibrium in the CeBr 3 -RbBr binary system was established from differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). This system has three compounds Rb 3 CeBr 6 , Rb 2 CeBr 5 and RbCe 2 Br 7 and two eutectics located at (x = 0.141; 858 K) and (x = 0.528; 762 K), respectively. Rb 3 CeBr 6 forms at 614 K, undergoes a solid-solid phase transition at 695 K and melts congruently at 966 K. Rb 2 CeBr 5 melts incongruently at 830 K and RbCe 2 Br 7 at 741 K. The electrical conductivity of CeBr 3 -RbBr liquid mixtures was measured down to temperatures below solidification over the whole composition range. Results obtained are discussed in term of possible complex formation. (M. Gaune-Escard). gram topology of LnCl 3 -MCl, LnBr 3 -MBr and LnI 3 -MI binary systems. All these systems can be divided into three groups [3]:
5 Methyl 4,5 dihydro 3H spiro[benzo 2 azepine 3,1´ cyclohexane] N oxide was rear ranged into 5 methyl 1 oxo 1,2,4,5 tetrahydro 3H spiro[benzo 2 azepine 3,1´ cyclohexane]. The latter was used for the synthesis of spiro{triazolo[3,4 a] and tetrazolo[5,1 a]benzo 2 azepinecyclohexanes}. Key words: spiro[benzo 2 azepinecyclohexanes], spiro{azolo[5,1 a]benzo 2 azepine cyclohexanes}, rearrangements, cyclic nitrones, fused triazoles, fused tetrazoles. 1.36 (d, 7.24-7.67 0.80-1.65 5.95 (br.s, NH) J = 11.6, J = 5.8, J = 7.0, J = 5.8, J = 7.0) J = 13.7) J = 13.7) J = 11.6) 3 1.73 (dd, 2.12 (dd, 2.97 (qdd, 1.37 (d, 7.18-7.88 0.70-1.80 8.23 (br.s, NH) J = 11.9, J = 5.8, J = 6.7, J = 5.8, J = 6.7) J = 13.7) J = 13.7) J = 11.9) 4 1.64 (m) 2.22 (m) 3.81 (m) 1.38 (d, 7.20-7.70 0.85-1.95 -J = 6.8) 5 1.74 (dd, 2.15 (dd, 2.93 (qdd, 1.27 (d, 7.15-7.40 0.65-2.00 2.45 (s, MeS) J = 11.9, J = 5.5, J = 6.7, J = 5.5, J = 6.7) J = 13.7) J = 13.7) J = 11.9) 6 2.12 (dd, 2.28 (dd, 3.11 (qdd, 1.40 (d, 7.25-7.60; 0.80-1.80 -J = 11.3, J = 5.5, J = 7.0, J = 5.5, J = 7.0) 7.95 (1 H) J = 14.0) J = 14.0) J = 11.3) 7 1.80 (dd, 2.19 (dd, 3.10 (qdd, 1.39 (d, 7.35-7.65 1.10-1.80 7.96 (BB´, J = 11.9, J = 5.5, J = 6.7, J = 5.5, J = 6.7) 3 pyridyl); J = 13.7) J = 13.7) J = 11.9) 8.66 (AA´, 2 pyridyl) 8 2.15 (dd, 2.35 (dd, 3.10 (qdd, 1.42 (d, 7.25-7.60; 0.50-1.80 7.90 (BB´, J = 11.3, J = 5.4, J = 7.0, J = 5.4, J = 7.0) 8.10 (1 H) 3 pyridyl); J = 14.2) J = 14.2) J = 11.3) 8.63 (AA´, 2 pyridyl) 9 1.86 (dd, 2.15 (dd, 3.38 (qdd, 1.39 (d, 7.23-7.64 1.00-1.80 3.96 (s, MeO) J = 11.6, J = 5.5, J = 6.7, J = 5.5, J = 6.7) J = 13.7) J = 13.7) J = 11.6) 10 1.98 (dd, 2.53 (dd, 2.96 (qdd, 1.44 (d, 7.30-7.55; 1.80-2.20; 2.28 (s, MeCO) J = 9.
Maǧallaẗ Al-Buḥūṯ Al-Mālīyyaẗ wa Al-Tigariyyaẗ, 2023
Biological Reviews
Archaeological Dialogues, 2022
Mersmann, Birgit; Kruse, Christiane; Bartetzky, Arnold (eds.): Image Controversies. Contemporary Iconoclasm in Art, Media, and Cultural Heritage. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2024
Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2013
MATEC Web of Conferences
Revista De Investigacion Psicologica, 2013
EHES Working Paper | No. 181 | April 2020, 2020
2019
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 1998
Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 2010
Journal of Composite Materials, 1999
สำนักศิลปากรที่ 12 นครศรีธรรมราช, 2020
Ifis Pan Sygn P 40492, 1975
Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2009
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2016
The Factory of Forms: Relational Settings, 2012
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2004