Academia.eduAcademia.edu

A Theatre Reading List

Comments and suggestions to [email protected] (last updated: 14 Jan 2013).

A Theatre Reading List C. W. Marshall Comments and suggestions to [email protected] (last updated: 14 Jan 2013). This list is selective and subjective: these are the books that I find myself most often recommending to students and colleagues, that have helped teach me how theatre works and how meaning is created in performance on stage. There is probably a bias towards the needs of classical scholars (as I perceive them), but there’s a lot to learn from each of these. 1. Bennett, Susan. 1997. Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production and Reception. Routledge. A study of audiences as a cultural phenomenon, that helpfully positions the experience of theatregoers not only in terms of the play but the whole event of going to the theatre. 2. Dessen, Alan C. 1984. Elizabethan Stage Conventions and Modern Interpreters. Cambridge UP. A great introduction to the representation of place and how that manifests itself in texts (esp. stage directions), providing the methodology for future work, including A. C. Dessen and Leslie Thomson, A Dictionary of Stage Directions in English Drama, 1580-1642 (CUP, 1999). 3. Johnstone, Keith. 1979. Impro: Improvisation and the Theatre. Faber & Faber (and later by Methuen and Routledge). An overview of Johnstone’s method for improv, with lots of practical examples. The chapter on Status provides a concept that is applicable to the analysis of any scene, scripted or unscripted, for academics or performers. 4. Mamet, David. 1999. True and False: Heresy and Common Sense for the Actor. Vintage. Concise advice on Mamet’s distinctive approach to acting, encouraging performers to play the truth of the moment and be true to the script. The anti-Stanislavskian approach offers a new way of understanding characterization in complex scripts. 5. McMillin, S. and S. MacLean. 1998. The Queen’s Men and their Plays. Cambridge UP. A detailed study of an Elizabethan company, using scripts as historical evidence for troupe size, etc., to complement other historical sources. 6. Miller, Jonathan. 1986. Subsequent Performances. Viking. A thoughtful examination of the afterlife of a play, and the choices one makes when one is presenting familiar works (‘classics’) to a modern audience. 7. Pickard-Cambridge, A. 1968. The Dramatic Festivals of Athens, second ed. rev. by J. Gould and D. M. Lewis, with a new supplement (1988). Oxford UP. The fullest synthesis of the evidence for the context of Athenian performance, combining study of the texts with epigraphy and visual evidence. 8. Sher, Antony. 2006. Year of the King: an actor’s diary and sketchbook, 20th anniv. ed. Limelight. Sher’s diaries as he tackles the role of Richard III, showing the range of questions faced by an intelligent actor engaging with a history of interpretations of a major role at the National Theatre. 9. Slater, Niall. 1985. Plautus in Performance: the Theatre of the Mind. Princeton UP. Provides the key articulation of how metatheatre works in Roman comedy, offering insights on six plays. The second edition (2000, Harwood) adds an appendix of other published articles. 10. Sofer, Andrew. 2003. The Stage Life of Props. Michigan UP. A historical study of specific stage props, and why they are meaningful in the theatre of their time: the host (Medieval), the handkerchief (Elizabethan), the skull (Jacobean), the fan (18th C), and the gun (20th C). 11. Taplin, Oliver. 1977. The Stagecraft of Aeschylus: The Dramatic Use of Exits and Entrances in Greek Tragedy. Oxford UP. This is the monument on which is built almost all modern studies of Greek stagecraft. Through a careful study of entrances and exits, Taplin draws on Shakespearian scholarship and articulates the basic language of tragic performance.