Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2017
…
9 pages
1 file
Medical anthropology involves up-close, person-centered, and ethically engaged examination of the complex cultural dynamics that underpin and give rise not only to health and wellbeing, illness and death, but also the medical systems on which we rely for treatment and cure. This introductory course will first discuss the history and development of medical anthropology as a sub-discipline of sociocultural anthropology. We will briefly explore the multiple directions that medical anthropology has taken since its inception, and the interdisciplinary approaches, concepts, and theories so central to contemporary anthropologists’ research, outreach, and activism. We will also discuss the field-based methods used by medical anthropologists – and ethnographers in particular – to investigate how cultural forces shape issues of health, illness, and medicine. The course will next focus on recent theoretical and ethnographic developments, such as the evolution of meaning-centered and critical medical anthropology approaches. Special attention will be paid to anthropologists’ efforts to explore how bodies, health and illness, and also medical services and systems are at the nexus of – and bear the effects of - intersecting neoliberal and capitalistic forces. In addressing the ways that social, political, and economic systems give rise to health (in)equity and (in)justice, we will gain insights to the socially important and applied ways that ethnography pulls into view otherwise obscured or invisible experiences, and the forms of suffering and signs of hope these entail. To this end, we will work together to review critical theories and ethnographic case studies of health and medicine in North America and around the world.
This course provides an overview of critically applied medical anthropology – the examination of the social origins of vulnerability, the role of structures of power in its social reproduction, and critical praxis in responding to it. We will explore the major theoretical lenses within medical anthropology with a particular focus on how medical anthropologists theorize the relationship between culture, structural violence, and health. We will consider its position within the broader discipline, with a particular focus on debates over its applied dimensions and radical alternatives related to those dimensions. In this course, you will gain ways to utilize ethnographic, anthropological, and qualitative data in health-related fields including advocacy and organizing, program evaluation and needs assessments, and health care delivery. You will gain critical skills in evaluating the adequacy and validity of formulations about “culture” and “tradition” in health programs and research, examine emic perceptions of disease, and consider the ways in which western science and biomedicine are themselves cultural constructs. You will become familiar with a range of work on culture and health, domestically and internationally. You will acquire skills in utilizing data about culture and health at macro- and micro- levels.
Conceptually and methodologically, medical anthropology is well-positioned to support a "big-tent" research agenda on health and society. It fosters approaches to social and structural models of health and wellbeing in ways that are critically reflective, cross-cultural, people-centered, and transdisciplinary. In this review article, we showcase these four main characteristics of the field, as featured in Social Science & Medicine over the last fifty years, highlighting their relevance for an international and interdisciplinary readership. First, the practice of critical inquiry in ethnographies of health offers a deep appreciation of sociocultural viewpoints when recording and interpreting lived experiences and contested social worlds. Second, medical anthropology champions crosscultural breadth: it makes explicit local understandings of health experiences across different settings, using a fine-grained, comparative approach to develop a stronger global platform for the analysis of health-related concerns. Third, in offering people-centered views of the world, anthropology extends the reach of critical enquiry to the lived experiences of hard-to-reach population groups, their structural vulnerabilities, and social agency. Finally, in developing research at the nexus of cultures, societies, biologies, and health, medical anthropologists generate new, transdisciplinary conversations on the body, mind, person, community, environment, prevention, and therapy. As featured in this journal, scholarly contributions in medical anthropology seek to debate human health and wellbeing from many angles, pushing forward methodology, social theory, and health-related practice.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2013
Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 1998
W ar, violence, and repression remain a way of life for many women, men, and children in the world today. The articles in this special issue of MAQ relate poignant stories of violence and suffering in multiple geographical and cultural locations including Nicaragua, Palestine, Mozambique, Tibet, Croatia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina. These articles focus on examining the meanings and complexities of the lived experience of repression and terror and reveal the extraordinary and subtle means by which people subvert, contest, and appropriate violence. They also question the common perception that political violence and repression operate in the same way everywhere. Medical anthropologists have begun to pay closer attention to war, conflict, and human aggression and also to how everyday forms of violence and suffering (Das 1996; Farmer 1996; Kleinman 1996; Scheper-Hughes 1992, 1996) structure people's everyday reality and social relations. As a collective effort, the articles presented here pay close attention to quotidian life-the humble, familiar, and mundane aspects of everyday experience, what Henri Lefebvre (1991) has called the "revolution of everyday life." In doing so, these articles reveal not only the suffering and alienation that violence and warfare produce, but also the human possibilities that violence and warfare engender. This human potential is optimistically demonstrated in Carolyn Nordstrom's article about the recent war in Mozambique, which illuminates the creative ways in which people unmake violence. And it is tragically described in Linda Pitcher's portrayal of the intentional death of the Palestinian shaheed, or martyr. Bodies and Embodiment Although medical anthropology has long been concerned with the physical and emotional suffering of the body that results from illness, disease, and death, the
Journal of the Royal Anthropological …, 2006
Medical anthropology is concerned with both the causes and consequences of human sickness, and its various theoretical orientations can be grouped into four major approaches: medical ecology, critical medical anthropology, interpretative medical anthropology, and ethnomedicine. While medical anthropologists of all theoretical persuasions have examined why people get sick, the analysis and understanding of patterns of treatment has been largely confined to ethnomedicine. Historically, more emphasis has been placed on the personalistic or supernatural aspects of ethnomedical systems than on naturalistic or empirical components. While this focus has produced valuable insights into the role of ritual and belief in healing, it has led to the impression that traditional medicine is primarily symbolic. Moreover, it ignores the theoretical bases of traditional healing strategies and the practical means by which most of the world heals itself, namely plants. Recently there has been more interest in the empirical character of ethnomedical systems, and in this paper we consider the role that medical ethnobiology has played in this shift of focus. We begin with a brief history of medical anthropology to illuminate why naturalistic medicine was neglected for so long. We then review exemplary research in two areas of medical ethnobiology -ethnophysiology and medical ethnobotany -that address the study of naturalistic aspects of medical systems. We conclude with suggestions for future research at the interface between medical ethnobiology and medical anthropology that will contribute to both fields.
Health, Culture and Society, 2010
The essays in this volume consider what medical anthropology means in the academy and outside of it. Written by a diverse group of anthropologists, some of whom also work as doctors, public health workers, and NGO staff members, the essays share personal insights on how they used anthropology to solve health problems and improve interventions. Several of the contributors draw on their own illness experiences to reconsider the health challenges they have previously sought to understand, analyse, and document. Other essays come from authors who have struggled to incorporate anthropological methodologies and perspectives in multi-disciplinary research and medical relief work. Also included are essays from professional anthropologists who reflect on the value of their discipline’s mission and methodology. This collection demonstrates how anthropology is used in policy and health interventions and attempts to bridge the gaps between policymakers, clinicians, NGO workers, doctors, and aca...
Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 2023
This collection contemplates that which resides at the limits of the anthropology of health and medicine. By "limit," we mean that "outside which there is nothing to be found" and "inside of which everything is to be found" (de la Cadena 2015: 14, citing Ranajit Guha 2002: 7). Our work takes place within many kinds of limits: epistemological frameworks, ethical and moral commitments, disciplinary norms, ontological certainties, political economies, writing conventions, and the ends of life, to name a few. In this collection of essays and accompanying conversations, we consider how medicine and health are performed in ways that appear beyond such limits—as impossible, unreal, unscientific, irresponsible, unthinkable, nonacademic, non-replicable, fictitious, unethical, unruly, or untrue—but which, nonetheless, are. In so doing, this collection moves toward the speculative to examine the potential it holds for displacing our sedimented ways of thinking and producing knowledge in and about medicine, health, and healing. Our speculative orientation draws on and augments broader anthropological interventions that experiment with doing, thinking, and writing otherwise.
2020
Critical Medical Anthropology presents inspiring work from scholars doing and engaging with ethnographic research in or from Latin America, addressing themes that are central to contemporary Critical Medical Anthropology (CMA). This includes issues of inequality, embodiment of history, indigeneity, non-communicable diseases, gendered violence, migration, substance abuse, reproductive politics and judicialisation, as these relate to health.
Uluslararası Sanat ve Estetik Dergisi, 2024
International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences
The ethics of researching the far right: Critical approaches and reflections, 2024
Geomorphology, 1996
Remate de Males, 2014
Lampas 32.2, 1999: 128-48
Vienna Journal of African Studies 46/2024, 2024
Educational Research Review, 2020
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2017
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2020
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1995
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2018
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, 1998
Rīgas Tehniskās universitātes zinātniskie raksti, 2020
FEBS Letters, 1989