Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
The Caravan, 2020
The essay explores a brief genealogy of tribal communities' categorization in colonial and Indian censuses. It further discusses Bhagat movements, or Hindu religious reform movements, in central India and how they transformed the religiosity of tribal communities. Lastly, it highlights contemporary adivasi religious assertions and the ongoing demand for inclusion of the "Tribal Religion" category in the upcoming census.
Economic and Political Weekly, 2018
The underlying causes for the ethnic, religious, and political divides among the tribals of Jharkhand have been examined. Tribal leaders have failed in uniting the tribal society of Jharkhand, leading to divisive and fragmented politics among them. The tribal leaders of today need to realise and understand that any further divide will weaken their collective voice and identity.
P.Berger and F.Heidemann The Modern Anthropologyology of India, 2013
I first provide a brief general introduction to the region before reviewing general ethnographic works on Jharkhand. We see how the ethnographic discussion evolves into a debate on citizenship and identity. I then present the historical background of the region and the Mundari political and social structures followed by the emergence of the state of Jharkhand, created in 2000 in Central India. I show how the Adivasis have been reordering the world since colonial times and reinvented their traditions. The present society produces a debate on civil society and citizenship influenced by the legacy of the Jharkhand movement. Traditional knowledge has helped the Mundari groups to imagine themselves as a moral community, a samaj, able to generate religious leaders, as well as writers. The Adivasi cultural renewal is explicit and asserted in religious and literary movements, but it conceals class conflicts as dominant actors speak in the name of custom (colon) and silence others, such as women and minority groups. .
None of the pre-Aryan races, the Negritos, the pre-Australoids, the Mongolians, the Dravidian had any contribution to make towards the formation of caste1 (Compare Rai Bhadur S.C.Roy's Presidential address to the Anthropological Section of the Indian Congress in 1931). Unless it is inferred to mean primitive aboriginal taboos on food and marriage. Strictly speaking, restrictions as to inter-marriage and inter dining cannot be said to be the only two tests of the caste system; they are really the tests of tribal divisions among the primitive races. It may be argued that this non-Aryan spirit of tribalism and separatism ultimately developed into the present caste-system of the Indo Aryans as a compromise between the ideals, institutions and beliefs, which the Aryans found rampant among the peoples in the land of their adoption, and that by the natural process of adjustment three thousand or more castes were formed among the Hindus, on various bases, namely race-mixture, vocation of occupation, social usages, out casting or ostracism, special religious doctrines and so forth. The clash between the two racial and cultural traditions and ideals seems to have affected the Aryan Society almost as much as it affected the non-Aryan communities who entered the Hindu fold. In the present stage of imperfect materials, it is difficult to determine how much of the one was taken up by the difficult to determine how much of the one was taken up by the other. But this much seems apparent that each had to adapt itself to the new conditions of social life and that usages and practices which are not to be found in the sacred books of the Hindus must have been borrowed from the aborigines; and the customs and habits of the non-Aryans which are not in accordance with their traditional practices must have been taken from the Aryans.
Journal of Adivasi and Indigenous Studies, 2021
The politics of symbolism with its manifestations in the assertion of Adivasi identity that had resulted in creation of separate state for Adivasis had undergone drastic changes in two decades of its formation. Land alienation, mining, development projects have had been the markers of the portrait of the modern state. Religio-cultural spaces have been discussed less in comparison to the growing studies on Maoism, mining, forest and indigeneity in Jharkhand. Transfer of political power in the democratic politics between the two leading political parties Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (the party that claims to be the voice of the Adivasis) and the Bhartiya Janta Party (The right wing Hindu dominated party) has brought the issues of saffronisation, upholding of Adivasiyat and the Hindu-Christian-Sarna identification of the Adivasis to fore. Basing this study mainly on the field work done in the Chotanagpur plateau area and collection of empirical data, the paper seeks to explore these representations through flags; that are flaunted as symbols of power by the different sections inhabiting the state. The paper further looks into the denominational politics that is transforming its character under these pressures. With the recent passage of Sarna code by the State Legislative Assembly demanding separate religious identification of the Adivasi religion, the debate has become sharper and clashes are witnessed quite often. Amidst rapidly changing religio-cultural scenario, the paper attempts to explain the politics of symbolism with a historical understanding of the region.
When the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (the Declaration) was adopted in the UN General Assembly in September 2007, only four states voted against it, while 11 states abstained. Australia revised its position in 2009, officially endorsing the Declaration. In 2010, New Zealand, Canada and the US followed suit. Furthermore, two countries that had previously abstained from the vote also expressed their commitment to the Declaration. These are important developments and the value of the consensus around the Declaration cannot be underestimated.
2021
Identify the major religious faiths that are coexisting in India since long past describe the religious groups of India with their brief history, main teachings, Holy Books scriptures and festivals, describe the population size, geographical distribution, socio-cultural and economic life of different religious groups explain the concept of religious pluralism in the context of India relate the contributions of different religions to the growth and development of a composite nature of Indian art, culture and society.
Studies in Nepali History and Society, 2016
Ethnic activists in Nepal after the 1990 political change have used two types of mobilization strategy regarding culture and religion. The first set of strategy is related to the specific demands on the state. The Nepali state has partly responded to them in recent years by recognizing and offering public holidays on ethnic festivals and, most notably, by declaring Nepal a secular state in 2006. The second set of strategy, which is the focus of this paper, involves inward activism. This activism has aimed at transforming ethnic cultural practices and worldviews from within. Under this scheme, ethnic organizations and activists have called for an ethnic cultural revival as well as the purification of ethnic cultures from what they have termed "Hindu" or Hindu-inflected cultural practices. A non-Hindu imagination and an emphasis on the distinctiveness of ethnic cultures from "Hindu culture" have been one of the major characteristic features of Nepal's Janajàti movement (Gellner, Pfaff-
Palladium, 2023
Русская Православная Церковь (РПЦ) поддержала агрессию против Украины и облекла свою поддержку в религиозные одежды. При этом РПЦ проявила удивительное единодушие: никто из епископов на территории России не выступил против агрессии, а редкие антивоенные выступления духовенства жестоко карались церковными властями. Это позволяет предположить, что к началу российской агрессии в Русской Православной Церкви сложился определенный консенсус, если не конкретно по отношению к войне в Украине, то, по крайней мере, к безоговорочной поддержке государства и оправданию насилия в целом. Какие для этого были предпосылки и как именно был сформирован механизм солидарной поддержки авторитарного государства и культа насилия со стороны Церкви? В эпоху церковного возрождения у Церкви, казалось, были силы сопротивляться этому и выбрать иной путь развития.
Orillas. Rivista d'ispanistica, 2024
Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare , 2016
Primer Saque, 2019
Turai István (szerk.): Mesél a múlt. Régészeti feltárások Törökbálinton. Törökbálint 2021, 2021
Sociologia e ricerca sociali, 2022
Μητρόπολη Τριμυθούντος, 2021
Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville), 2017
Loyola of Los Angeles law review, 1996
Armed Forces & Society, 2004
Journal of Crop Improvement, 2017
E3S web of conferences, 2024
Information Processing & Management, 1988
2024