Engaging Learners with Literacy Instruction
Annabelle Villamarin
Department of Education, University of the People
EDUC 5270: INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNIQUES FOR THE ELEMENTARY AND
MIDDLE SCHOOL CLASSROOM
Olysha Magruder
3 March 2021
Introduction
A learner's experiences can be heavily influenced by a myriad of factors and experiences in the
classroom. These experiences can engage the learner to acquire skills and include social and
cultural experiences provided through classroom design, instruction, and assessments.
Literacy Development
Students learn a language in different ways. We have skill-based instruction and a
whole-language approach to learning, where both play a role in holistic language development.
Literacy development is a complex process but an essential one as students use language to
make sense of their world.
Primary school students make meaning within the classroom context and their social
interactions with their peers (Rueda & Dembo, 1995). Their experiences at school play a critical
role in developing literacy. As an educator, we are expected to design learning engagements that
allow for a holistic experience, reduce specific language component focus, and incorporate as
many language experiences.
Students who show positive behaviour towards literacy development see reading as a purposeful
event as it connects to their needs and interests as a person (Dahl & Freppon, 1995).
Language instruction enriches the students by incorporating them as a primary resource. To
develop literacy, teachers invite the students to choose what books interest them and invite them
to collaborate with their peers. They also allow the students to make meaning as per their
reading and connect this to their own experiences in an unstructured way. Davis (2010) pointed
out in her article that most students felt that student-centred reading activities bring the joy of
reading. These activities, structure around the learner, allow them to actively build on what they
know in relevant ways (Dahl & Freppon, 1995).
A teacher who extends literacy development in other areas like social studies or history
promotes inter-disciplinary exploration and improved skills, both in literacy development,
historical perspectives or science exploration and experimentation.
Historical Thinking in Action
Learning about historical artefacts excites students, promotes higher-order thinking skills and
social interaction (Fuhler et al., 2006). When students are invited to become journalists and
explore historical perspectives, play with resources as if they are looking for clues to common
knowledge to support or negate it. Using the primary resource, the teacher can make a topic
more engaging and exciting (Newman & Warach, 2008).
A lesson exploring migration and colonisation perspectives might see Hernan Cortes as a victor
for Spain, while the local inhabitants might see him otherwise. The exploration of historical
perspectives through primary resource makes the learner more informed and share perspectives
that suit a valid interpretation. Although historical perspectives are relative to the presenter, it is
the critical thinking skill that helps the learner be more appreciative and discerning of
perspectives.
Historical Thinking Assessments
Assessments that focus on historical thinking extends the connection between primary resource
and historical thinking in action. A teacher ensures students see resources with a sharp lens to
question the source, evaluate the validity of evidence and read the source carefully. Students
will 'cut & paste' information without a strong scaffolding of literacy skills and not be perceptive
of its meaning.
Historical thinking assessments are a necessary skill students need to know to assess resources
and perspectives and absorb historical perspectives in their learning.
Conclusion
Literacy development is a complex process and develops the aspects of reading, thinking and
communicating. A teacher who fosters student-centred learning sees them as a primary resource
that builds the class's experiences. Historical thinking incorporates literacy skills and can build
on each other, making the learning experiences more relevant to the child.
References
Dahl, K. L., & Freppon, P. A. (1995). A comparison of innercity children's interpretations of
reading and writing instruction in the early grades in skills-based and whole language
classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(1), 50–74.
Davis, L. (2010). Toward a lifetime of literacy: The effect of student-centred and skills-based
reading instruction on the experiences of children. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 15(1&2).
53-79. New York University. Retrieved from h ttps://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ910114.pdf
Fuhler, C. J., Farris, P. J., & Nelson, P. A. (2006). Building literacy skills across the curriculum:
Forging connections with the past through artefacts. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 646-659.
https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.59.7.4
Newman, M. & Warach, R. (2008). Primary Sources and Literacy. TPS Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 1,
Summer issue. Library of Congress Teaching with Primary Sources Program, Retrieved from
https://www.loc.gov/static/programs/teachers/about-this-program/teaching-with-primary-source
s-partner-program/documents/literacy-integration.pdf
Rueda, R., & Dembo, M. H. (1995). Motivational Processes in Learning: A Comparative
analysis of cognitive and sociocultural frameworks. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.),
Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 9), (pp. 255–289). Bingley, United Kingdom:
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.