Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2020
…
3 pages
1 file
Oedipus the King is a play originally written by Sophocles. While Sophocles develops the mental images along quite specific lines, the imagery of light and darkness used literally of sight and blindness and metaphorically of knowledge, ignorance, and the darkness of Oedipus’s acts.
In literature, novelists, playwrights, and dramatists use various literary elements to explain their work. Blindness is explored in depth in Sophocles' Oedipus. People can be physically blind, where they cannot see their surroundings; on the other hand, people can have physical sight but be blind to the future or the spiritual authorities around them.
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 2000
The Mythological Background to Sophocles' Oedipus 2) Sophocles as a Playwright 3) Interpretations of the Oedipus 4) Sophocles' Oedipus and the Greek Enlightenment
ABSTRACT Aristotle built the system of tragedy in his Poetics and gave examples from Sophocles’ play ‘Oedipus the King’ while describing the basic elements of tragedy. Based on this, it is possible to say that Sophocles' Oedipus the King is one of the ideal examples of the tragedy. Why does Aristotle, particularly, gives examples from Oedipus the King in Poetics while explaining the tragedy, what is the reason behind this situation and how did the basic tragedy elements of Aristotle take place in the text of Oedipus the King? The objective of this article is to analyze the structure and features of Sophocles’ tragedy, Oedipus the King, and to interpret why Aristotle particularly referred to this play while giving significant information about tragedy in Poetics. Accordingly, it is aimed to explain the tragedy elements in Aristotle’s Poetics, and to explain such elements within the structure of the play, Oedipus the King. Building a deeper understanding following topics will be examined as a result of this article; the general characteristics of Ancient Greek Theater, the emergence of tragedy, Aristotle’ basic elements of tragedy in Poetics, different views of Aristotle and Plato on tragedy, short biography of Sophocles, and his characteristics made him shine as a tragedy writer, the basic structure and characteristics of Oedipus the King. Key Words: Catharsis, Drama, Mythos, Mimesis, Tragedy, Theater
Greek or Attic tragedy was an inherent part of the culture of ancient Athens. The form, originating from earlier ritualistic traditions was considered to be the most superior of dramatic forms. Apart from tragedy, the other forms of dramatic productions were comedy and satyr-plays but these were considered to be of lesser import. The city celebrated a five day annual festival in late March to honor Dionysius Eleuthereus, the god of wine and theatre. In this festival, three acclaimed writers each of whom presented a trilogy of tragic plays and a satyr drama competed for the prize. Earlier, all four plays were thematically tied and constituted a tetralogy but later Sophocles and Euripedes espoused a single play format. As for the subject, the playwrights used to modify and creatively present different versions of myths that were widely accepted.
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae
The author of Oedipus Rex manages to reconstruct the hero’s life path against the background of the map of Greece of his day. In doing so he constructs the imaginary of the protagonist’s identity, one that is inextricably linked to his mental blindness as opposed to the tragic, self-inflicted blindness meted out to himself as a punishment for his crimes.
In approaching this issue, it will be helpful to use two analytically distinct methods, to wit, the diachronic, which allows us to speculate about how the myth reached the hands of Lydgate (Guerin 2005, 183–191); and the synchronic, to clarify the similarities and differences between the two authors. Thus, approaching the subject diachronically, the first pages of this paper will attempt to delineate the main milestones in the long tradition of the myth of Oedipus, beginning from the time of Ancient Rome; and, afterwards, a synchronic analysis will examine various motifs as they have survived, disappeared or been transformed in the medieval poem. The final part will explore the possible reasons for these changes.
Journal of Jungian Scholarly Studies
Sophocles’s Oedipus plays depict failed integration of self-knowledge as worthy of divinization. Acting out vengeance is the evidence of Oedipus’s failed integration. Oedipus’s task of integration pivots on grasping in what sense he can be understood as guilty. His plight demonstrates that ignorance is part of unconsciousness and, contrary to Jung’s attitude toward ignorance, requires some kind of coping with responsibility. Vengeance was a conscious value among the ancient Greeks. In Sophocles’s last play, Oedipus at Colonus, Oedipus acts out vengeance against his sons, and Sophocles divinizes this acting out through having Oedipus join the goddesses, the Furies. This divinization suggests that vengeance is archetypal, depending on culture only for images of manifestation. I argue that Oedipus’s acting out of vengeance can be read as symptomatic of a cultural complex. I identify the situation leading to his acting out as his failure to imagine how creatively to take responsibility ...
Avant: Journal of the Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard, 2014
Древняя Русь. Вопросы медиевистики, 2024
Rivista degli Studi Orientali, n.s. XCVII, 1-2 (2024)
Lebenswelt: Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience, 2019
Investigations non invasives et histoire urbaine en Italie romaine, Liegi 27-28 ottobre 2022
2012
Online Journal of Health & Allied Sciences, 2013
International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 2007
Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2016
Physics Letters B, 1999
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017
Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, 2004
Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2015