Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
11 pages
1 file
Sanskrit and Prakrits are derivatives of the Indo-Aryan family of languages, however their exact relationship is debated. The brahmin s, who followed the Vedas used Sanskrit as the language of their rites and rituals, and preferred keeping both Sanskrit and sacred and knowledge restricted to privileged caste groups. One way of ensuring this was strict oral transmission and the active discouragement of writing. By comparison, the sramanas such as Jains and Buddhists, who rejected the authority of the Vedas, preferred passing on religious insights and various forms of knowledge to the masses––Jain mythology puts great emphasis on essential equality of all people, and in one view, of all beings––and for this purpose they preferred Prakrits, since those languages were commonly understood. They also pioneered writing, and Prakrits are closely linked to the script called Brahmi. In India, sramanas , especially Jains, also helped in formalizing scripts for regional languages. Brahmi-derived scripts have been used for languages derived from Prakrit-Sanskrit and also have been adapted for languages with other origins, including the Dravidian, Austroasiatic, Sino-Tibetan, and various South East Asian groups of languages. Thus, sramanas have had an impact on most extant writing systems in South and South East Asia in direct or indirect ways.
When talking about writing, we see absence of writing in early India or we can say traditional India. There were many reservations about writing in early India. On the whole, traditional India was much less oriented toward the written word than many other ancient and traditional cultures such as those of classical China and Japan or of the Islamic world. Brahma and also his wife (or daughter) Sarasvati, the goddess of learning, being regularly depicted in sculpture with a book in hand. But in contrast written knowledge was referred to as money in someone else's hand in early times. But we do get many inscriptions from Indian subcontinent and they pose a serious proof that writing do existed. Panini used the word LIPI to denote the script. Jatakas and Vinaya-Pitaka of Buddhist text refers to numerous explicit references to writing. Megasthenes suggested that Indians knew writing but his contemporary nearchos said that Indians do not know writing. Some scholars have proposed a connection with the proto-historic Harappan script. Mahasthan and Sohgaura inscriptions have been proposed as precursor. Recent claim of 'pre-Asokan Brahmi' on the basis of evidence from Anuradhapura. B.B. Lal proposed that the 'script' on the pottery from Vikramkhol (Odisha) is a 'missing link' between historical Brahmi and the proto-historic script of Harappa. But this theory is generally not accepted. Richard Salomon argued that these are 'pseudo-inscriptions' or 'Graffiti'. Ahmed Hasan Dani later proved that inscriptions of Mahasthan and Sohagaura were either contemporary to or later than Asokan inscriptions. F.R. Allchin and Robin Coningham excavated the famous site of Anuradhapura in Sri Lanka and suggested an early date on the basis of stratigraphic evidence. From stratigraphic layers of that site they came across some sherds and they suggested that these sherds should be taken as evidence of pre Asokan Brahmi because the layer to which they hailed was dated prior to 3 rd century BCE. After more than a century of study, the early history of writing in India remains problematic. It begins with the still un deciphered script found on the seals and other relics of the Indus Valley civilization, which flourished, according to recent estimates, around the second half of the third and first half of the second millennium B.C. after the decline of Harappa we see a creation of vacuum of writing
People’s Linguistic Survey of India, Volume 36, 2021
Scripts have their own distinct function. Several authors have mentioned that the early development of all Indian scripts were either from Brāhmī or Kharoṣṭhī. The Brāhmī script was developed under Semitic influence around 7th c. BC and was originally written from left to right. Whereas the Kharoṣṭhī script whose direction of writing is in Aramaic, from right to left, came into being under Persian rule during the 5th c. BC in northwest of India. In the later centuries, Brāhmī gave rise to eight varieties of scripts from early Mauryas to Gupta ruling period which were employed for writing during 4th c. BC to the 6th c. AD. We know that the ancientness of the Indian language is being proved from its soil which says about two types of language form, i.e. spoken and written. The spoken form of language is expressed in two ways. One preserved through folk forms and the other preserved through cave and rock paintings. The songs sung at the time of birth, death and work conditions are preserved; stories were painted through cave paintings which represent the creativity of literature. The inhabitant of this land stated to drawn this language at about forty thousand years back in Upper Palaeolithic Period. There is a need to evaluate the new trend towards assigning a later date of origin for the Indian scripts in the light of broader historical and cultural prospective. After the discovery of extensive urban civilization in Indus Valley, some scholars indicate that the Indian Script is established around 2500 BC. Recent analyses of the signs available in the inscriptions have led several scholars to view that the language is not belong to Indo-European family, nor it is close to the Sumerians, Hurrians, or Elamite, nor it can be related to the structure of the Munda languages of modern India. Most probably it is a developed from Rock Art which found in various part of India. This paper critically reviews the historical and contemporary ideologies on the origin and development of Indian scripts and establishes that the Indian scripts are mostly and clearly related to the cave arts as existed in our primitive to modern Indian architecture. So it implies that the Cave arts are the forerunners of Indian Scripts.
Acta Linguistica Asiatica
Current research exploits the orthographic design of Brahmi-derived scripts (also called Indic scripts), particularly the Devanagari script. Earlier works on orthographic nature of Brahmi-derived scripts fail to create a consensus among epigraphists, historians or linguists, and thus have been identified by various names, like semi-syllabic, subsyllabic, semi-alphabetic, alphasyllabary or abugida. On the contrary, this paper argues that Brahmi-derived scripts should not be categorized as scripts with overlapping features of alphabetic and syllabic properties as these scripts are neither alphabetic nor syllabic. Historical evolution and linguistic properties of Indic scripts, particularly Devanagari, ascertain the need for a new categorization of its own and, thus preferably merit a unique descriptor. This paper investigates orthographic characteristics of the Brahmi-derived Devanagari script, current trends in research pertaining to the Devanagari script along with other Indic scrip...
Political and technological background in Aśokan times in comparison to Western cultures. Different reasons for the introduction of Kharoṣṭhī at the western border of ancient India and the introduction of Brāhmī in the political centre further east. The role of the seal-cutters and their possible influence in the transmission of Brāhmī writing to Sri Lanka.
Indialogs, 2023
The origins of Brāhmī script have been mired in controversy for over a century since the Semitic model was first proposed by Albrecht Weber in 1856. Although Aramaic has remained the leading candidate for the source of Brāhmī, no scholar has adequately explained a letter by letter derivation, nor accounted for the marked differences between Aramaic, Kharoṣṭhī and Brāhmī scripts. As a result, the debate is far from settled. In this article I attempt to finally answer the vexed questions that have plagued scholars for over a century, regarding the exact origins of Brāhmī, through a comparative letter by letter analysis with other Semitic origin scripts. I argue that Brāhmī was not derived from a single script, but instead was a hybrid invention by Indian scholars from Aramaic, Phoenician and Greek letters provided in part by a western Semitic trader.
The current version has been modified for presentation on the WWW. This has meant making compromises in the presentation of accented characters, etc., and may have introduced typographical errors. Finally, the original article included graphical representations of characters from Brāhmī, Kharoṣṭhī, Aramaic, Greek, etc., which have all been reduced here to the placeholder "¤".
These Proto-Saharans shared a common system of writing which first appeared on the pottery and later evolved into a syllabic writing system .
Scripts have their own distinct function. Several authors have mentioned that the early development of all Indian scripts were either from Brāhmī or Kharoṣṭhī. The Brāhmī script was developed under Semitic influence around 7th c. BC and was originally written from left to right. Whereas the Kharoṣṭhī script whose direction of writing is in Aramaic, from right to left, came into being under Persian rule during the 5th c. BC in northwest of India. In the later centuries, Brāhmī gave rise to eight varieties of scripts from early Mauryas to Gupta ruling period which were employed for writing during 4th c. BC to the 6th c. AD. We know that the ancientness of the Indian language is being proved from its soil which says about two types of language form, i.e. spoken and written. The spoken form of language is expressed in two ways. One preserved through folk forms and the other preserved through cave and rock paintings. The songs sung at the time of birth, death and work conditions are preserved; stories were painted through cave paintings which represent the creativity of literature. The inhabitant of this land stated to drawn this language at about forty thousand years back in Upper Palaeolithic Period. There is a need to evaluate the new trend towards assigning a later date of origin for the Indian scripts in the light of broader historical and cultural prospective. After the discovery of extensive urban civilization in Indus Valley, some scholars indicate that the Indian Script is established around 2500 BC. Recent analyses of the signs available in the inscriptions have led several scholars to view that the language is not belong to Indo-European family, nor it is close to the Sumerians, Hurrians, or Elamite, nor it can be related to the structure of the Munda languages of modern India. Most probably it is a developed from Rock Art which found in various part of India. This paper critically reviews the historical and contemporary ideologies on the origin and development of Indian scripts and establishes that the Indian scripts are mostly and clearly related to the cave arts as existed in our primitive to modern Indian architecture. So it implies that the Cave arts are the forerunners of Indian Scripts. Keywords: Indian Scripts, Brāhmī, Kharoṣṭhī, Indus Valley Scripts, Cave Arts, Odisha Rock Art Scripts, Indian Architecture.
India today is home to three types of widely-used scripts: 1-Brahmi-based Indic scripts; 2-Roman based systems used for writing Khasi, etc.; 3-Arabic and Persian based Nastaliq (Urdu) script. In addition to these, there are unexplored indigenous scripts, community scripts which are not available to wider audiences. Historically speaking, people of the Indus and Harappa civilizations also had an understanding of writing, but those writing systems have not been deciphered so far (See Kak 2007). There are no authentic records of the nature/names of scripts and languages that were taught as subjects or medium/mediums at the renowned educational institutions during the pre-Mauryan [pre-Ashoka] times at the places like Taxila, Sharada, Nalanda and so on. One of the Jataka-s informs/records that the Buddha was supposed to learn as many as sixty-four scripts. According to one theory, Brahmi is descended from the Indus-Saraswati script (See Kak. op.cit.). Brahmi script comes down to us from Ashokan inscriptions and stone engravings from the third century BCE. Kharoshthi, the other script used at that time, which was written from right to left has disappeared. Most of the Buddhist literature written in central Asia at that time used this script. A serious question to ponder is: Do Perso-Arabic and Nastaliq scripts share any structural-phonetic features with Kharashthi? Brahmi-based Indic scripts are written from left to right, the Roman script is also written from left to right. Nastaliq like its source Perso-Arabic is written from right to left. Indic scripts are alpha-syllabries or abugida where a consonant-letter except the anusvara and visarga, have a CV structure, the V in these consonant-letters is an 'a', which is deleted with the help of a diacritic mark called halanta. Deletion of the vowel 'a' in a vowel-sandhi [a-a] situation is denoted by avagraha-an elongated S like sign. The replacement of 'a' from a consonant-letter requires a matra-system in these writing systems. 'a', obviously, does not need a 'matra', all other vowel-letters need a matra. Hence, the writing system is called an alpha-syllabry or abugida. The Brahmi
Academia Green Energy, 2024
Accounting and Finance Review (AFR), 2016
«In principio fuit textus». Studi di linguistica e filologia offerti a Rosario Coluccia in occasione della nomina a professore emerito, a cura di Vito Luigi Castrignanò, Francesca De Blasi e Marco Maggiore, Firenze, Cesati, pp. 61-72. , 2018
Translatability of Emotions: Cross-Cultural Transdisciplinary Encounters,, 2022
2009
Revista Andaluza de Antropología, 2018
Artuklu Akademi SBD, 2024
ACM Transactions on Internet of Things
Le rovine di Umbertide: i bombardamenti tra aprile e maggio 1944, 2025
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013
Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 2013
Wahana Literasi: Journal of Language, Literature, and Linguistics
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Slaskiego, Katowice, Poland, 2019
SAGE Open, 2015
Atlas of genetics and cytogenetics in oncology and haematology, 2020
Nurse Education in Practice, 2014
International Journal for Equity in Health, 2022
Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, 2009