Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Review, "The Meaning of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight".

Brynjarr A Source Critique of Alan Markman’s „The Meaning of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight“ Despite being a relatively „old“ article, having been written in 1957, Alan Markman’s „The Meaning of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight“ is far from being outdated. He touches on various points of interest not only on the subject of the poem in question, but also advances his own propositions regarding the romance genre. He begins his article by reviewing previous scholarship on the character of Gawain and his origins, where the hero has been placed „among the ranks of primitive Celtic gods“1 . He argues that the consequence of this placement is such that „Gawain’s success might perhaps be best accounted for because he is not to be taken for the representation of an ordinary human being, but because he is, on the contrary, either a superhuman or supernatural being“2 . This is an interesting point to dwell upon and explicate. Some scholars have written their own propositions which are in accordance with Markman’s argument. J.R.R. Tolkien, who, for example, considers Sir Gawain and the Green Knight to be a fairy story3, argues that the hero Gawain is human: he „is not presented as a mathematical allegory, but as a man, an individual human being“4. Northrop Frye, in his Anatomy of Criticism, maintains the same sentiment in his discourse on the romance hero: „If superior in degree to other men and to his environment, the hero is the typical hero of romance, whose actions are marvelous but who is himself identified as a human being“5. Such perspectives shift the attention away from an anthropological point-of-view , 1 p. 574 2 Ibid. 3 Tolkien, J.R.R. „Sir Gawain and the Green Knight“. In The Monsters and the Critics and Other Essays (London: HarperCollinsPublishers, 1983), 73, 83. 4 Ibid., 79. 5 Frye, Northrop. The Anatomy of Criticism (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1957), 33. wherein Gawain is deemed a Celtic fertility god, to a more psychological reading of the poem, its themes and its hero that explores the tensions that fester in Gawain’s mind as he faces the challenges of the Green Knight. The merits of Markman’s article are too many in number to recount within the limitations of this critique, yet an attempt will nonetheless be made to analyze them further. Markman can be agreed upon in pointing out that „it is magic, not mythology or folklore, which informs and directs the marvelous occurrences in the romance“6 . Dustin Geeraert is of the same mindset7 , and so is Tolkien8, on the importance of magic in the narrative of the poem. Markman furthermore proposes a term that proves useful for the study not only of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight but also of the genre of medieval romance. He discusses the „romance function“, „the technique which brings the known in contention with the unknown so that, in the half real, half unreal world of romance, the hero can demonstrate the very best action which a man can perform“9 . It is a „controlled test“ to find out „what a perfect knight can do when he is forced to face the unknown“10. The theory engages with Markman’s central argument that the poem expresses and emphasizes the humanity of Gawain. He supports this idea with his conception of the function of the romance hero „to stand as the champion of the human race, and, by submitting to strange and severe tests, to demonstrate human capabilities for good or bad action“11 . These ideas prove fruitful when synthesized with Beate Schmolke-Hasselmann’s assertion that „an increasing alienation from the concept of perfect chivalry goes hand in 6 p. 575. 7 „Marvels are a serious concern in Sir Gawain“. From „‚Etaynez þat Hym Anelede of þe Heӡe Felle': Ghosts of Giants in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight“. Comitatus: A Journal for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, Vol. 49, 2018. p.73. 8 „On Fairy Stories“. In The Monsters and the Critics and Other Essays (London: HarperCollinsPublishers, 1983), 114. 9 p. 576. 10 p. 575. 11 p.582. hand with the humanization of Arthurian characters in the sense of emphasizing their human weaknesses, thus bridging the gap between them and the average person“12. The idea that Sir Gawain and the Green Knight as a romance that presents itself as a depiction of the humanity of Gawain, or, according to Markman’s own words, as a „forceful presentation of its human hero“13 , thus becomes all the more clear and evident. Markman’s article paves a different path for discourse on Sir Gawain and the Green Knight by transforming him from the Celtic god of previous scholarship to a human knight who strives to fit the unattainable chivalric ideals of his society, an individual who is consequently the more elevated in status because he is made indubitably human. Moreover, it is worth a scholar’s while to investigate further the bountiful theories on the romance genre put forth in Markman’s article in accordance with those of critics such as Northrop Frye (as in his work on the Anatomy of Criticism) or Tzvetan Todorov (who draws on but also critiques Frye’s propositions)14 . 12 „Knight or lover: Gawain as a paragon divided“. In The Evolution of Arthurian Romance (Cambridge: University Press, 1998), 141. 13 14 p. 586. See The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre (New York: Cornell University Press, 1975), with particular attention to pp. 3-23.