Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Introduction: Strikebreaking During Europe's Belle Époque

2019, European History Quarterly

https://doi.org/10.1177/0265691419863982
Introduction Introduction: Strikebreaking During Europe’s Belle Époque European History Quarterly 2019, Vol. 49(4) 553–569 ! The Author(s) 2019 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/0265691419863982 journals.sagepub.com/home/ehq Matteo Millan University of Padova, Italy Among the various strategies used by ‘capital’ to counter the unions, ‘the scab is by far the most formidable weapon’. With these words, Jack London described the socalled War of the Classes that was taking place in the United States during the early twentieth century. London also invited scholars to approach the class struggle not only from a merely theoretical perspective, but by focusing on violent practices, organizational strategies and furious confrontations.1 The American case is certainly a clear archetype in terms of the violent counter positions between ‘capital’ and ‘labour’. Images of heavily armed Pinkerton private detectives and gangs of scabs armed with sticks and brass knuckles immediately spring to mind, but so do images of brutal police forces employed in the service of private interests. Such perceptions were shared by contemporaries of London across the Atlantic. As a French journalist recalled in 1887, ‘the police in the United States have become another of the armed bands of the Middle Ages which were found in the service of the barons’.2 Some years later, in 1909, the economist Charles Gide stated that ‘in the United States (but not yet in France) employers hired their own briseurs de gre`ve (strike-breakers), that is to say jaunes (yellow unions), organized for the resistance and to strike back’.3 Gide’s claim is important. Apparently without recognizing the paradox in his statement, he was denying the existence of strikebreakers in France while using a French term to define them. Indeed, the term jaunes became synonymous with the independent (i.e. non-socialist) unions found throughout Europe and their role in acting as briseurs de gre`ve, often at the behest of employers and company management.4 This dystopic perception is indicative of an enduring twofold stereotype that emphasizes American exceptionality in terms of violent social conflicts and armed strikebreaking in opposition to the supposed European moderateness. In a rather peremptory statement, historian Stephen Norwood alleged some years ago that ‘the United States during the early twentieth century was the only advanced industrial country where corporations wielded coercive military power. In Europe, employers did not hire armed mercenaries’. On the Corresponding author: Matteo Millan, University of Padova, Italy. Email: [email protected]