Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2020, TRAC - Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference
…
1 page
1 file
The Roman world has been a focus of fascination and research for several centuries. It is at the centre of countless collections as well as studies, reports, and publications. This research outpour has become an object of research in itself, as archaeologists working on ancient sites have to often engage with older publications produced when the standards of archaeological investigations and associated publications were different from the ones expected today. This session focuses primarily on studying material from old(er) excavations using new methodological approaches to the reinterpretation of old reports with the aim of bridging the gaps between modern archaeology and pre-WWI archaeology. A second key issue covered in this session is how to approach an excavation in areas that were already excavated in the past and consequently, how to address the problems posed by old documentation in such cases. Finally, the session is concerned with how to deal with material from sites with missing documentation, also accounting for geographical biases resulting from different historical traditions of archaeological analyses. By exploring past and modern approaches to old methodologies, this session addresses the manifold obstacles that are encountered on the way from initial discovery and excavation to analysis and final publication of a site and its finds, while assessing the significance of past archaeological endeavours for the advancement of the general scientific knowledge of the Roman period.
Published December 2010. Here the first few pages of a penultimate draft. Reviews: Sveta Matskevich, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2011.08.19 (online here http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2011/2011-08-19.html): "[T]he book… makes an extremely valuable contribution to the topic of archaeological method and theory. It describes the state of art in the sphere of recording systems, and discusses important topics in their history and development… The book has a strong theoretical background and good raw data for future research. A reader can further link the two parts of the book, test the presented theory using the case-studies, or analyze the data in her own way. It invites scholars to continue Pavel’s research and to explore the topic further. It is of interest for a very wide audience: from students of archaeological method to theoreticians and historians of archaeology. The catalog of context sheets, along with brief descriptions of very diverse recording systems will serve as an invaluable source of inspiration for any field archaeologist inventing or improving an excavation recording system. The list of bibliographical references grouped by topics is useful for everybody studying subjects related to archaeological theory, recording methodology and history of archaeology." Madeleine Hummler, Antiquity 85 (328), 2011, 690-2 (“New Books Chronicle”; also online here http://antiquity.ac.uk/Ant/085/0690/ant0850690.pdf): "The figures and commentary are the most useful part of the book… bringing to the attention of excavators the variety of systems used by institutions and companies, thus dispelling the idea that there is only one way (or adaptations of one system) to record deposits ‘properly’… He has done us a great service by reproducing all these forms in 100 pages of figures… the basis for an in-depth look at the written records produced on archaeological sites." Library holdings (online catalogues): Library of Congress, Bodleian Library Oxford, U of Cambridge, Princeton Institute for Advanced Study, Albright Institute for Archaeological Research Jerusalem, American School of Classical Studies Athens, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, U of Toronto, University College London, BCU Bucharest, BCU Cluj, New Europe College Bucharest, Georgia Institute of Technology, U of Tennessee in Knoxville, Getty Research Institute, U of Notre Dame, Central European University, Bournemouth University, Towson University, U of Cincinnati, Loyola University Chicago, Emory University, UMBC University Maryland, U of Tel Aviv, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, U of Virginia, U of Rochester, Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Rom, Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Berlin (ZENON catalogue), Römisch-Germanische Kommission Frankfurt, Columbia University, U of Iowa, U of Pittsburgh, U of Texas at Austin, U of Michigan, U of Pennsylvania etc.
American journal of archaeology, 2004
Current Approaches to Roman Frontiers, 2024
Dear Delegates,
2015
Abstract: an individual essay on excavation, recording and pu blication of archaeological sites starting from the problems of Roman London in the 1970's and 1980's which have thankfully been resolved in the work of today.
Antiquity, 2003
Roman archaeological research in Britain has undergone a revolution in recent years, becoming a theoretically-informed subdiscipline exploring exceptionally rich data sets in new ways. It has a great deal to offer the rest of archaeology: however, it remains unduly isolated, and some perceive serious threats to its future. These were issues discussed at the recent seminar, ‘Whither Roman Archaeology?’
Academia Medicine, 2024
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2020
American Journal of Botany
Nursing Outlook, 2019
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2015
ISSUE FIVE, 2019
Semina: Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2000
Integration, the VLSI Journal, 2010
Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, 2020