Architrenius: Johannes de Hauvilla

The Journal of Medieval Latin, 2010

2020

Uncorrected proofs of my chapter for the Anthology of European Neo-Latin Literature. Battista Mantovano, Adolescentia 5 (selections): Introduction, text, translation and commentary.

Classical World 105 (2011/12) 25-38

This article reconsiders the relationship between Horace's iter Brundisinum (Sat. 1.5), Lucilius' iter Siculum (book 3), and Aristophanes' Frogs. It argues that both Horace's poem and Lucilius' are more extensively indebted to Frogs than had previously been recognized; that Horace's claim (Sat. that Lucilius was "totally dependent" on Old Comedy has a superficial plausibility if one considers only Lucilius' first three books, though hardly applicable to his whole corpus; and that Horace chose to link Lucilian satura with Old Comedy, rather than with Archilochus and the iambographers, because in his Epodes he was presenting himself as Archilochus' heir.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:53:00 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions REVIEW ARTICLE TURNING BACK THE CLOCK* Love is after all a very personal and individual as well as universal experience, and love poetry is usually (among other things) the expression of an individual who is or has been in love. -R. 0. A. M. Lyne, The Latin Love Poets By introducing the "image" of the poet, as distinct from the facts of the poet's life, as the true content of relevant poetry, he can forbid us to use poetry for disengaging "mere historical information." -E. Badian, review of J. E. G. Zetzel's contribution to B. K. Gold, ed., Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Romwe

Forschungsstelle für Vergleichende Ordensgeschichte (FOVOG) Research Centre for Comparative History of Religious Orders Dieser Band wurde im Rahmen des Vorhabens "Klöster im Hochmittelalter: Innovationslabore europäischer Lebensentwürfe und Ordnungsmodelle" erstellt, einem Gemeinschaftsprojekt der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig und der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften. Der Leipziger Anteil an diesem Projekt wird im Rahmen des Akademienprogramms von der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und dem Freistaat Sachsen gefördert. Das Akademienprogramm wird koordiniert von der Union der deutschen Akademien der Wissenschaften. Diese Publikation wird mitfinanziert durch Steuermittel auf der Grundlage des vom Sächsischen Landtag beschlossenen Haushalts. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de.

Classics for All, 2019

Share to F acebookShar e to T wi tter Share to PrintShare to EmailShare to Mor e1

Classical Review, 2000

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].