Academia.eduAcademia.edu

05 Conclusion

2016

a study in embodied learning

MA in Education (Dance Teaching) Exploring identity through performative self portraits: a study in embodied learning CHAPTER 5 Conclusion By Shabari Rao This research project is submitted in part fulfillment of the requirement for the award of MA in Education (Dance Teaching) I began this research project with the desire to dig deeper into what appeared to be a vibrant context for embodied learning, that is, a context where young people had the opportunity to explore personal identity through the moving body, culminating in the performance of a self portrait. The initial design and purpose of the course emerged organically, and after teaching it a few times, it became apparent to me that there was a lot to uncover in terms of exploring the body as a site for learning. The best way to do this seemed be to track the students' own experience of the course to capture the highly subjective and intangible nature of the experience. Thus, this is a project that is firmly rooted in my practice and indeed, the questions that drive the research emerged from the teaching of the course. Other that tracking student experience, this project gave me the context to delve deeper into the literature and scholarship around themes of embodiment, learning and the body. This has significantly enriched my personal understanding of the course and given me the vocabulary and conceptual scaffolding to communicate the complex issues, themes and ideas that come together here. During the course of this project there were moments of uncertainty and even confusion. This was, in part, due to my lack of experience as a researcher and in part due to the emergent nature of the design of the project (Robson, 133). As a beginner researcher, I was very conscious of the dual role that I was playing as teacher and researcher and questions of bias kept coming up. For example, I would sometimes wonder if during a session I was subtly guiding the students towards a certain outcome because of objectives of the research project. However, I began to understand that in practitioner research the key is not to deny the presence of the researcher, but to fully acknowledge it (Fox, Martin and Green, 81). In terms of the emergent nature of the project, I did not start out with a hypothesis to test but instead with a desire to investigate an experience. Therefore, a lot depended on the students' experiences, observations and indeed their willingness to share this with me. At times, I would wonder if the value I saw in the course as an opportunity for embodied learning was limited to just me, or whether the students shared this view. However, being an area of inquiry that I am keenly interested in, and the questions being rooted strongly in my practice gave me the confidence to trust in the process and allow the research to unfold and take its course. One of the questions that this research project seeks to investigate is: How does exploring personal identity through the moving body evidence embodied learning in young adults? Through the course I witnessed changes in my students who began the course with an unexamined and perhaps unconscious belief in the mind body duality (see Johnson, 11), but arrived at a very different understating of the relationship of the mind and body through an embodied experience. To me this shift was both fascinating as well as affirming. I see this research project as the core of a nested set of concerns that drive my professional practice. Starting with the big picture: If the body can be recognised as a site for learning beyond the functionality of negotiating a physical environment, then it's relevance to education becomes unquestionable. Dance then can be seen as one context in which the body's potential to learn is foregrounded, moving it away from the conventional place of dance in education. And this project is one example of an empirical study of student experience of a dance course that clearly demonstrates the potential for learning through the body. The implications of this research project for my practice are immediate and clear. Firstly, it validates the pedagogical choices made in delivering the course. But more importantly, it takes the first step in re-articulating the purpose of dance in education (discussed in more detail in chapter 1). Now, at the end of this process, what stands out clearly is the value of formal, systematic practitioner research and its contribution to my professional development. The understanding that “the practitioner researcher thinks about practice and research from a position that is different to academic researchers” and brings value to the research because of the “reflexivity that comes from the proximity of the practitioner to the field of research” (Fox, Martin and Green, 196) was important for me. This highlights the cyclical process of practitioner research as it serves to enrich future practice. Going forward there are two things that emerge as potential areas of engagement for me. First, as a practitioner I see the potential for advocacy and policy change to alter the way in which dance is placed in Indian educational institutions and to move this towards viewing dance as a context for embodied learning. Second, as a researcher, I see the strong potential to explore the heritage of embodied practice in India and develop the discourse and scholarship around that in relationship to dance and education in contemporary India. Again, both these potential areas of practice and research are closely tied together and can only serve to strengthen each other.