Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Abstract Affordances for Extended Affectivity

Marta Caravà Affordances for extended affectivity – Abstract Workshop “Investigating the Mind. Pain, Emotion & Affective Disorders”, Ruhr-University, Bochum (Germany), November 2018. The Extended Mind Hypothesis (EMH) holds that the mind should be identified with cognitive processes that take place in the active relation between the brain, the body, and the environment (Clark, Chalmers 1998; Clark 2008; 2016). Crucially, advocates of the EMH claim that sometimes our minds extend to objects, which are said to embed contents of externally realized mental states. The EMH is a great step beyond in the philosophy of mind and the cognitive sciences because it tries to go back to everyday situated cognitive practice when it explains what the mind is. In addition, its emphasis on the role of objects in cognitive processes is a real and interesting challenge for our common sense view of the mind, according to which the mind is something we “have” in our brain or in our body. Nevertheless, the EMH’s exclusive focus on cognitive processes is a problem for a theory that aims to account for the complexity of the human mind because affectivity is neglected (Stephan, Walter, Wilutzky 2014). In my presentation, I will follow the new “affective strand” in the framework of extended approaches to the mind (Colombetti 2014, 2015, 2017; Colombetti, Krueger 2015; Griffiths, Scarantino 2009; Slaby 2014; Slaby 2016) proposing a possible way to explain affectivity as an extended process. In particular, I will focus on the role of objects in affective dynamics. Like mental states, also affective states have usually been said to be owned by human agents; therefore, an emphasis on objects seems to be crucial to account for affectivity as extended. I will consider a possible account of the affective role of objects, applying the EMH’s orthodox argumentative structure to affectivity (Colombetti, Roberts 2014). I will show that a commitment to an informational version of the EMH entails some problems. Indeed, if objects are said to contribute to affective dynamics because they function as an external storage of affective information, an important point is underplayed: objects have an affective power also because of their material and perceptual features (Malafouris, Renfrew 2010). Therefore, I will explore another way to think about extended affectivity, working on the concept of “affective affordance” (Fuchs, Koch 2014; Gibson 1979; Rietveld 2008; Roe, Aspinall 2011). By “affective affordance” I refer to the relation between embodied agents and perceptual features of objects (e.g. colour, shape, texture). I suggest that perceptual features of objects might trigger certain kinds of feeling, bodily reactions, bodily postures and dispositions to act, namely states or processes that can be considered to be components of emotions (Colombetti, Roberts 2014; Fuchs, Koch 2014; Scherer 2009). Following this hypothesis about the relation between environmental affordances and emotional dynamics, I propose to consider objects of the environment as components of an “affectively extended mind”, which encompasses human subjects, objects and features of the environment (affordances). In particular, I suggest that objects and environmental features are fundamental for affectively extended dynamics because, thanks to their material features, they can constrain the way affective dynamics unfold, functioning as tools for emotion regulation (Gross 1998; Krueger 2014, 2017). For instance, think about the way natural environments (e.g. forests) can contribute to reduce negative emotions or to spur a restorative experience (Johnsen 2013); or think about the way bodily postures or motor actions performed upon objects with given perceptual features (e.g. holding a cup of hot coffee) can increase bodily feelings correlated to subjective aspects of emotions (e.g. feeling relaxed, warm, calm; Fuchs, Koch 2014). This point about parts of the environment and emotion regulation processes seems to suggest that we can think of a relation of “looping” between the emotional states of embodied agents and parts of the world. Objects and environmental features afford affective states and affective changes, which on their turn modify the agent’s perspective on the environment (Colombetti 2014; Slaby et al. 2013). This effect of looping seems to suggest that objects and environmental features are really important for affective dynamics because they actively shape them. Therefore, it seems possible to claim that, given this shaping function of objects, things and environmental features can be considered to be components of an “affectively extended mind”. Considered this hypothesis about the role of objects in shaping affective dynamics through “individual emotion regulation”, I also briefly explore the possibility of considering “affective affordances” as tools for “collective” or “intrapersonal” (Kappas 2013) emotion regulation. By “collective emotion regulation” I refer to the way objects of the environment contribute to shape shared affective situations. My hypothesis is that affordances of the environment, by disclosing or preventing certain kinds of action, might influence the affective structure of the interaction between human subjects. This last point would provide some general insights to further enrich the hypothesis of an affordance-based “affectively extended mind”, extending the crucial role of objects in affective dynamics to a collective level. References Clark, A., Chalmers, D. (1998). “The Extended Mind”. Analysis, 58 (1): 7-19. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action and Cognitive Extension. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. - (2016). Surfing Uncertainty. Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Colombetti, G. (2014). The Feeling Body. Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press. (2015). “Enactive Affectivity, Extended”. Topoi, Online First. (2017). “The Embodied and Situated Nature of Moods”. Philosophia, 45(4): 1437–1451. Colombetti, G., Roberts, T. (2014). “Extending the Extended Mind”. Philosophical Studies, Online First. Colombetti, G., Krueger, J. (2015). “Scaffoldings of the affective mind”. Philosophical Psychology, 28(8): 1157–1176. Fuchs, T., Koch, C. (2014). “Embodied Affectivity: on moving and being moved”. Frontiers in Psychology, 5: 112. Griffiths, P., Scarantino, A. ( 2009 ). “Emotions in the wild”. In P. Robbins , M. Aydede (Eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, 437–453. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gross, J. J. (1998). “The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review”. Review of General Psychology, 2(3): 271-299. Johnsen, K. S. A. (2013). “Exploring the use of nature for emotion regulation: Associations with personality, perceived stress, and restorative outcomes”. Nordic Psychology, 65(4): 306-321. Kappas, A. (2013). “Social regulation of emotion: messy layers”. Frontiers in Psychology, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00051. Krueger, J. (2014). “Affordances and the musically extended mind”. Frontiers in Psychology, 4: 1-13. (2017). “Emotions and the social niche”. In Salmela, M., von Scheve, C. (Eds.) Collective Emotions. Perspectives from Psychology, Philosophy, and Sociology, 156-171. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Malafouris, L., Renfrew, C. (2010). The Cognitive Life of Things: Recasting Boundaries of the Mind. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. Rietveld, E. (2008). “The skillful body as a concernful system of possible actions: Phenomena and neurodynamics”. Theory & Psychology, 18 (3): 341-63. Roe, J., Aspinall, P. (2001). “The Emotional Affordances of forest Settings: An Investigation in Boys with Extreme Behavioural Problems”. Landscape research, 36(5): 535-552. Sherer, K. R. (2005). “The dynamic architecture of emotions. Evidence for the components process model”. Cognition and Emotion, 2(7): 1307-1351. Slaby, J., Paskaleva, A., Stephan, A. (2013). “Enactive emotions and impaired agency in depression”. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20 (7-8): 33-55. Slaby, J. (2014). “Emotions and the Extended Mind”. In Salmela, M; von Scheve, C. (Eds.) Collective Emotions, 32-46. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (2016). “Mind Invasion: Situated Affectivity, and the Corporate Life Hack”. Frontiers in Psychology, 7: 1-13. Stephan, A., Walter, S. & Wilutzky, W. (2014). “Emotions beyond brain and body”. Philosophical Psychology, 27(1): 65-81.