Religion Compass 4/3 (2010): 166–175, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00199.x
Early Views of Paradise in Islam
Nerina Rustomji*
St John’s University
Abstract
This article presents the early history of the faith in Islamic Paradise (al-janna or the Garden) from
the seventh to the 12th century CE. The focus of the article is to trace three major stages in the
developing doctrine of the Islamic afterlife: doctrinal innovation in the Qur’an and early biography of the prophet Muhammad (Sirat Rasul Allah), elaboration in traditions of the prophet (hadiths), and formalization in eschatological manuals. While providing an introductory survey of the
afterworld, the author also considers some of the textual problems and ensuing controversies that
have arisen in the field of Islamic history.
The Islamic afterworld was a doctrine of faith, a motivation for reform, and most of all a
place where Muslims could live full, dynamic afterlives within the parameters of a physically described world. These otherwordly realms, known as al-janna (literally the Garden)
and al-nar (literally the Fire) were spaces that over the centuries Muslims discussed, elaborated, and eventually structured with objects, beings, and social realities that mirrored the
best and worst of earthly life. While the history of Paradise extends from the seventh century CE to the present day, the image of Paradise most often invoked by scholars emerged
between the 9th and 12th century CE with its full articulation by the 12th century. Afterwards, eschatological texts often commented, elaborated, or provided commentary on the
afterworld; however, their commentaries were based on a vision of Paradise that had
already significantly been structured. Part of the crystallization of the idea of Paradise is
evident in its terminology in Arabic. Most often referred to as al-janna in the Qur’an and
early texts, the concept of an otherworldly realm of reward was also indicated by the
terms sama’ (heaven) or firdaws (paradise), which 12th century Islamic texts eventually
identified as the highest level of the Garden.
In order to appreciate the process by which this early view of Paradise was understood,
created, and structured, this article offers a conceptual chronology of the Garden from an
early, innovative doctrine in the seventh century to a developed, formalized realm by the
12th century. The vision of Paradise in Islam shares common features with eschatology
from Iran (the bridge Sirat, for example, likens to the Zoroastrian Chinvat Bridge) and
the Hebrew Bible (Islamic texts discuss, for example, the four rivers of Paradise); however, Muslims articulated their visions of Paradise without regard to religious comparison.
Because this article aims to offer readers a broad intellectual history of the Garden, it will
not consider the particularly rich pre-history of articulations of Paradise; instead, it will
present Muslim commentary alongside the historiographical problems that force the scholar to makes choices about the eschatological material.
The first section, ‘Doctrinal Innovation in the Qur’an and Sirat Rasul Allah’ introduces
polemics reflected in the earliest literature about the inevitability of the Last Judgment
and also explores the ways that scholars deal with oral versus written transmission. The
second section, ‘Elaboration in Sahih Hadith Collections’ presents a range of traditions
ª 2010 The Author
Journal Compilation ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Early Views of Paradise in Islam
167
about the landscape, bodies, and social interactions within the Garden. While these
traditions are detailed, they do not often offer geographic or temporal specificity and so
this section will also address the limitations of approaching material that aims to normalize
traditions. The final part, ‘Formalization in Eschatological Manuals,’ focuses on the
treatment of eschatology within manuals from the 9th to 14th centuries. These works
further dramatized the Garden and gave it an architecture and social form that exists until
today. Because the most sensational aspects of Paradise emerge from the reflections of
Paradise in these eschatological manuals, this section will also address some contemporary
misperceptions about the Islamic afterlife. In seeking to provide an introduction to the
early views of Paradise in Islamic texts, the article demonstrates that Muslim faith in the
afterlife had a history which developed through time, and the study of eschatological
developments allows scholars to understand how Muslim articulated themselves through
their otherworldly conceptions.
Idea of the Afterlife in the Qur’an and Sirat Rasul Allah
The earliest recorded texts for Islamic history include the Qur’an and biographical traditions of the prophet Muhammad contained with the Sirat Rasul Allah, a text composed by
Ibn Ishaq (d. 768 CE) and edited by Ibn Hisham (d. 834 CE). In both texts, there was a significant lag between the events transpired and the events recorded. It took nearly three
centuries for the Qur’an, considered by Muslims to be the literal word of God transmitted
via the angel Gabriel to Muhammad, to be recorded, systematized, and fully vocalized.
The recension of the Sirat Rasul Allah that we use was recorded nearly a century and a half
after the prophet’s death and then edited two centuries after the prophet’s death. In order
to contend with the historiographical problem of written sources emerging from an oralbased society, scholars have been divided about how to deal with texts that form the basis
of Islamic doctrine and jurisprudence. Some scholars accept the general narrative propagated by Islamic tradition: Muhammad was a man who lived in the town of Mecca and in
610 CE began to receive revelations from God. Other scholars are uncomfortable with
accepting the terms of the Islamic narrative without early, written verification and in various works have intimated that Islam may have been influenced by or developed within a
different region, later century, or Jewish and Christian splinter sects (Wansbrough 1977,
1978; Crone & Cook 1977; Crone 1987; Hawting 1999; Cook 2004). In between these
two polarities, other scholars have challenged the field to resolve the impasse, to develop a
‘middle ground,’ and to find ways to engage with source criticism without denying the
importance of oral transmission (Berg 2000; Motzki 2003; Schoeler 2006).
At the heart of the controversy over sources are two issues that require scholarly
choices. The first is a judgment of how to deal with written sources that emerge from an
oral-based society. In this sense, scholars who deal with the early history of Islam have to
grapple with an oral-based historical rendering that early Muslims conveyed to each other
through stories that religious learned (ulama) committed to writing alongside chains of
transmitters (isnad) for further verification. The second issue deals with how to treat the
Qur’an as revealed text. Most scholars tend to bypass the question and treat the Qur’an
as another kind of historical source whereas other scholars encourage a critical reading of
the Qur’an (often with polemical intent) along the lines of biblical criticism since the
19th century (Ibn Warraq 2002; Luxenberg 2000; Wansbrough 1977, 2003).
While there are varying approaches about how to read the Qur’an and Sira, the two
works do present fairly consistent narratives. One of the majors themes within both
works is the inevitability of the Garden and the Fire and the promise that all of humanity
ª 2010 The Author
Journal Compilation ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Religion Compass 4/3 (2010): 166–175, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00199.x
168 Nerina Rustomji
will face the consequences of its choices. In the Qur’an the constant refrain about the
notion of recompense has been identified as one of the polemics that structures the
Qur’an itself, especially in the earlier Meccan suras that evoke the consequences of earthly
choices (Robinson 1996, Chittick 1987). At times the polemic about the Last Judgment
is explicit in the Qur’an:
Therefore, when there come the great, overwhelming (Event) – The Day when man shall
remember (all) that he strove for, and Hell-Fire shall be placed in full view for (all) to see –
Then, for such as had transgressed all bounds, and had preferred the life of this world, the abode
will be Hell-fire; And for such as had entertained the fear of standing before their Lord’s (tribunal) and had restrained (their) souls from lower Desire, their abode will be the Garden. (Qur’an,
1989, 79:34–41)
Other times, the polemic is more subtle. For example, sura al-Rahman accounts for the
creation of the world and treatment in the Garden and the Fire. In an effort to demonstrate that God created the world and will hold humanity accountable as well, the sura is
structured by the haunting refrain: ‘Then which of the favors of the Lord will you deny?’
(Abdel Haleem 1999).
The Sira also suggests a setting for the verses and records similar statements of incredulity and incomprehension about the Last Judgment and the promise of a future life. These
exchanges support the notion that the Last Judgment was seen as an innovation that was
both threatening and misunderstood by Muhammad’s detractors who rejected the message
that there was one God as opposed to a multitude of deities that were represented in the
various forms of religious worship surrounding the Ka’ba. In one exchange, leaders of
Muhammad’s tribe the Quraysh tried to negotiate with Muhammad. They first tried to
elicit a sense of shame for treating his tribe in such a peculiar way and then tried to find
a way to satisfy what they saw as his ambitious desires. They promised him money, a
title, sovereignty, or a cure for any ailment. In an effort to make his intentions clear and
to reinstate the Qur’anic polemic, Muhammad was said to reject their offers for money,
honor, and sovereignty and remind them that ‘‘‘I brought you messages of my Lord and
given you good advice. If you took the message of my Lord, then you would have a
portion of this world (al-dunya) and the hereafter (al-akhira); if you rejected it, I can only
patiently await the issue until God decided between me and you,’ or words to that
effect’’’ (Ibn Ishaq 1955, p. 134).
Aside from the structuring effect of the polemic in both the Qur’an and early sections of the Sira, invocations to the Garden also are pivotal in the way that they are
associated with the new faith-based structure that Muhammad was revealing. In the
Sira, mentions of the Garden and Fire are made long before the text uses the terms
‘Muslims’ or ‘Islam.’ In fact, the doctrine surrounding the Garden and the Fire became
a focal point for both early Muslim converts and their detractors. Also, within the Sira,
there is a story told by a Jewish man who foretells the story of Muhammad by specifically mentioning the resurrection, the reckoning, the scales, the Garden, and the Fire
(Ibn Ishaq 1955, pp. 93–4). In these textual moments, the new faith is identified
through the concept of the Last Judgment and afterlife long before it is associated with
any doctrines, rituals, or even given a name. In later anecdotes, Muslims and Meccans,
such as the vocal Meccan leader Abu Jahl, exchange differing visions about the veracity
of the afterworld. Some of the debates involve punitive angels in hell (Ibn Ishaq 1955,
p. 141), bitter fruit from the hellish tree of Zaqqum that Abu Jahl claims is no worse
than buttered dates (Ibn Ishaq 1955, p. 167), and even future recompense in the
Garden (Ibn Ishaq 1955, p. 162). In this sense, the doctrinal innovation of the afterlife
ª 2010 The Author
Journal Compilation ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Religion Compass 4/3 (2010): 166–175, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00199.x
Early Views of Paradise in Islam
169
becomes one of the ways in which the Qur’an and the Sira signal the distinct message
conveyed by Muhammad.
Given the controversies in Islamic Studies about how to read the Qur’an and the Sira,
there is significant contestation that the early texts report the innovative character of the
Last Judgment. The strategy of scholars has often been to either assert or deconstruct the
Islamic narrative embedded within Qur’anic verses or biographical traditions. A close
engagement with the sources, however, suggests another approach. No matter the scholarly position, the Garden was one of the early identifiers of Islam. Within the earliest
recorded texts, the Garden becomes a textual site where Qur’anic verses and biographical
traditions depict an alternative reality to the world. That alternative vision was not just an
alternate message, but also an alternate world – a superlative world – that was only to be
experienced through good actions made manifest at the end of time. Before Islam was formalized and identified through doctrines such as tawhid (unity of God) or jihad fi-sabil allah
(striving in the path of God), there was the assertion that the new faith was recognized as
the religion of the Garden (Rustomji 2009). That sensibility was made manifest through
the ways that the Garden was employed to provide motivation to battle the Meccans after
the Muslim community established itself in Medina. It also became prominent when
Muhammad was able to see the hereafter during his Night Journey and Ascension (al-isra’
wa-l-mi’raj), when he was purported to be led by Gabriel to Jerusalem where he first led
prayer for Abraham, Moses, and Jesus and then ascended a fine ladder to see the fires of
hell and visit the seven levels of heaven (Bencheick 1988, Bencheick 1991).
When it comes to the traditions of the Garden, the quest for textual verifiability is not
the most fruitful endeavor since the doctrine of the afterlife does not concern the location
or periodization for the coming of Islam. No matter opinions about the credibility of the
sources, the earliest sources from verses to biographical traditions suggest that the idea of
the afterworld was one of the first and most powerful ways to articulate the faith, provide
motivation for believers, and damn those who provided opposition to Muhammad’s
revelations.
Elaboration in Sahih Hadith Collections
Islamic texts do not just depict an afterlife, they detail an afterworld (Rustomji 2009,
p. xvi). The Garden and the Fire, after all, are more than just states of being. They are
also spaces for living and sometimes objects themselves, in the case of traditions where
the Garden is an animated creature. Because of the capacity to be both a place to be
inhabited and a realm in which believers can encounter God directly, the Garden has a
greater material character than the form of heaven and hell in other religious traditions,
such as Judaism and Christianity (although Eastern Christianity also has a heaven of material nature, it is not as extensive). Even though Muslims had vigorous debates about if
the rewards of the Garden were to be understood metaphorically or literally, a tour of its
landscape allows us to see how Muslims imagined their afterworlds.
The best way to illustrate the differences is to view the extensive nature of prophetic traditions or hadiths. Hadiths are sayings of the prophet Muhammad or reports
of his deeds. Composed of a chain of transmission (isnad) and content matter (matn),
hadiths were compiled and then classified by religious learned on the spectrum from
sound (sahih) to weak (da’if). Sometimes hadiths are also classified as gharib, which
indicates their unusual, foreign, or borrowed status. Hadiths present extremely rich
inventories about the Garden because they offer details of life in the Garden that
extend beyond the narrative strands of Muhammad’s Night Journey and Ascension.
ª 2010 The Author
Journal Compilation ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Religion Compass 4/3 (2010): 166–175, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00199.x
170 Nerina Rustomji
Yet, while hadiths can offer specific details about life in Paradise, they often do not
give any clues about their circulation. It is sometimes difficult to know where, when,
or even if a particular hadith circulated. The problem is compounded by the fact that
the most extensive collections of hadith are found in collections of hadith that were
deemed to be ‘sound’ because they recorded traditions whose chains of transmissions
could be verified. Collectors of hadith, such as al-Bukhari (d. 870 CE) and Muslim
(1999, d. 875 CE), compiled and categorized traditions. In the process, they also vetted
the circulating traditions by evaluating the isnads so that that their volumes reflect
what they considered to be the most verified traditions. By contrast, the interesting
collection of al-Tirmidhi (d. 892 CE) also report traditions that are considered gharib.
Sometimes, social context becomes vital for interpreting a tradition, especially when
the historical context is not evident. For example, if a hadith discusses the river
between Syria and Byzantium, it most probably circulated sometime during Muslim
campaigns there. On the whole, however, the vision of the Garden presented in the
hadiths cannot be specified in terms of time and place. Nonetheless, it is possible to
paint a picture of life in the Garden as reflected in traditions that were compiled in
written records in the ninth century and to locate correspondences for reward in the
same way that scholars have linked images of punishment in the Fire in the 12th and
13th century with state-based violence (Lange 2008).
Like the etymology of the word ‘Paradise,’ the Garden is an enclosed garden space. As
mentioned in the introduction, al-janna is not the only term used to denote Paradise.
Sometimes the term al-firdaws, which is traditionally translated as ‘Paradise,’ is also used.
Some texts tend to represent al-firdaws as the highest level of the Garden, whereas others
conflate the terms al-firdaws and al-janna. No matter the term and multiple levels and
dimensions of the afterworld, a singular image of Paradise emerges within the hadith
collections: the banquet.
As a perpetual banquet, life in the Garden is filled with ease and wonder, unlike the
daily living of earthly life. The Garden itself has a marvelous landscape. It is a realm of
fountains and rivers filled with ease in contrast to earthly life. In the Qur’an the Garden
is sometimes qualified with the phrase ‘gardens beneath which rivers flow’ (47:12), and
there is also mention of rivers of wine, milk, and honey (47:15) (El-Zein, 2006). In the
hadith, the rivers become amplified, and in additional to the previous three rivers of
wine, milk, and honey, a river of water is mentioned. These four rivers reinforce the
mention of four rivers in the Hebrew Bible: Pishon, Gihon, Tigris, and Euphrates (Genesis 2:10–4). Yet, four rivers are also mapped onto an earthly geography and include the
Sayhan and Jayhan, which are Anatolian rivers that cross Cilicia and flow into the Mediterranean, and the Euphrates and Nile. Aside from the fountains salsabil (76:18) and the
fountain or river al-Kawthar (108:1), the Garden is also filled with trees, such as generic
shade trees (13:55), date palm trees, pomegranate trees (23:19, 55:28–9), and vines that
bear grapes (78:32). Like the tree of Zaqqum in the Fire, there is also a significant tree
for the Garden: the Sidrat al-Muntaha (53:19), the Lote Tree of the Boundary that is
located on one end of the Garden by the throne of God (53:20). In hadiths, the Sidrat
al-Muntaha gains more symbolic value for being near the throne of God, and for that
reason, it is not surprising that the graphic covers of contemporary editions of eschatological manuals often show a tree in the horizon. Aside from water and trees, the Garden is
the realm of smells like camphor, musk, ginger, saffron, and perfumes. The structures of
the Garden are made of gold, silver, pearls, and gems. While each of these materials is
mentioned in the Qur’an, in hadith collections, the materials are given greater prominence. In one hadith, Muhammad is to have said that the Garden is made of ‘a brick of
ª 2010 The Author
Journal Compilation ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Religion Compass 4/3 (2010): 166–175, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00199.x
Early Views of Paradise in Islam
171
gold and a brick of silver with mortar of excellent musk, and pebbles of pearls and gems,
and its soil is saffron’ (al-Bukhari 1976, Kitab al-tafsir, bk. 60, no. 488).
While the landscape is composed of precious metals, refined scents, and abundant water,
humanity is also transformed into purified versions of themselves. Believers will beam,
laugh, and rejoice (80:38–9), they will have no need to labor, and they will be restored to
their full capacity (sometimes given the age of 30 or 33) and also cleansed of bodily fluids
and pollution. Reclining upon thrones or couches on silk carpets, believers will wear fine
silks and fine and heavy brocades (18:21, 76:21, 44:53) that are laced with silver and gold
and pearls (76:12). Aside from the opulence of life, believers will enjoy reconnecting with
their families through all generations, and they will be able to meet their forefathers and
their progeny (13:23). They will also be served food and drink by young men (wildan) and
servant boys (ghilman) ‘youths of perpetual (freshness): If thou seest them, thou wouldst
think them scattered pearls’ (76:19 and 56:17). Aside from their families, male believers are
also granted pure female companions (houri) who are mentioned as ‘pearls well-guarded’
(55:72) or ‘like gems and small pearls whom no man or jinn before them has touched’
(55:56) in the Qur’an (Stetkevych 1997). In the hadith, their descriptions are further elaborated so they are composed on saffron, adorned with jewels, and so fair that their marrow
can be seen through their flesh. They also speak to the believers: ‘We live forever and never
pass away, we are affluent and never austere, we are content and never discontent. Blessed
are those who belong to us and to whom we belong’ (al-Tirmidhi n.d., 4:2,533).
The ‘swift glimpses’ (Reinhart 1991) of the Garden in the Qur’an are given greater
detail in hadiths whose exchanges were often initiated by Muslims who wanted to learn
more about the future world that lay ahead of them. The elaboration was meant to fill in
the details for a world that was yet to come, and for that reason, hadiths capture a world
that is structured by two principles: amplification and earthly transformation. Amplification
is evident in the scale of the elaboration that offers a kind of spectacle for the believer to
behold (al-Azmeh 1995). The spectacle, which extends from the precious metals to the
silks to the food to the sexual capacity of men, suggests an infinite quality to the realm of
the Garden. The Garden is not just perfect; it is everlasting in its perfection. The second
principle takes many of the attributes of the Garden and reconfigures them so they are not
bound by earthly parameters (Rustomji 2009). For example, earthly lote trees are known
for their shade and their thorns (Watson 1974). Hadiths endow lote trees which such
shade that a rider will be able to ride for a hundred years without emerging from its protection; yet the trees are also described as ‘thornless.’ Another example is the case of nonintoxicating clear liquids in the Qur’an, which then transform into khamr (wine made of
red grapes) that does not intoxicate. The transformation of the wine from an intoxicating
to non-intoxicating beverage not only shows the ambiguity regarding the beverage (Kueny
2001), but it also demonstrates how the reconfigured realm of the Garden can allow the
pleasures of drinking alcohol without any of its ill effects.
The building of an afterworld within the hadiths, then, allows a space for the afterworld to grow in detail and form, and we can read of the concerns and expectations of
Muslims regarding the future life. In those reflections, sometimes hadiths offer the sense
that the Garden is a realm of reward for the believer in all the ways that the believer
could imagine. The Garden is a promise, then, of a reconfigured world and humanity.
Formalization in Eschatological Manuals
Scholars collected material from the Qur’an and hadiths and organized them into small
tracts that informed Muslims of what they should expect from the time of their death to
ª 2010 The Author
Journal Compilation ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Religion Compass 4/3 (2010): 166–175, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00199.x
172 Nerina Rustomji
their entry in the Garden or the Fire (Smith and Haddad 1981, Eklund 1941, Homerin
1985, Cook, David 2003). These manuals that concerned eschatology not only become
repositories for the material about the Garden and the Fire, but they also were sites
where theologians could address Muslims’ questions about the afterlife. Through the narrative process, the scholars not only depicted the Garden, but they structured it and
imbued it with moral resonance. The manuals, then, drew upon hadith collections and
compiled traditions; however, they differed from previous texts because their aims were
not just to record. Instead, the narrative structure of the eschatological manuals suggests
that were composed for the religious edification of a broader audience. Like corresponding manuals about the apocalypse, eschatological manuals tended to dramatize the events
after time in a way that a loosely connected series of hadiths could not.
It is in these dramatic renderings that the full articulation of Paradise as a site was realized. The eschatological manuals are unified in providing a narrative form so that each
one has a definite beginning, sometimes the time of death or Judgment, other times the
actually entry into the Garden. In this way, the manuals tended to provide the afterworld
the temporal framework from life to death to what lay beyond. While this timeline propelled the narrative forward, not all the manuals had the same purpose. Some were dedicated to mystical contemplation (al-Muhasibi (d. 857) 1978), whereas others were
intended for moral edification (al-Ghazali (d. 1111) 1979, 1989; al-Qadi (d. ca. 12th century) 1977; al-Samarqandi (d. 1002) 1966; al-Qurtubi (d. 1273) 1980), whereas yet others
invoked earthly consequences, but also provided answers to certain questions about the
future world (Ibn Habib (d. 852 or 853) 1987).
In the new narrative framework, the hadiths often took on a more determined structure. For example, the gates and levels of the Garden which were invoked in the Sira and
hadith form a definite motif of eight gates and eight levels, each of which is reserved for a
certain group, such as prophets, messengers, martyrs, those who prayed, those who were
charitable (zakat), those who did pilgrimage (hajj and ‘umra), or those who struggled in the
path of God (jihad). Each level is also associated with a different garden name and jewel.
For example, the sixth garden is the ‘Garden of Firdaws’ (al-Samarqandi 1966, D4 and alQadi 1977, p. 76), and new gems also appear as part of the landscape such as green chrysolite, red and yellow coral. Waters are also given more prominence. Al-Kawthar figures
more prominently as a pool or river given to Muhammad (al-Qadi 1977, p. 77). Also aside
from the Lote Tree of the Boundary, which is the named tree of the Qur’anic verses and
hadith, the tree Tuba is the bejeweled tree within some eschatological manuals. It is made
of roots of pearls, trunk of ruby, branches of chrysolite, and leaves of silk brocade. Most
significantly, it is connected to the leg of the throne of God, which also has a more prominent role in the manuals as an ultimate destination for believers (al-Qadi 1977, p. 78).
The prominence of the houri is a result of her growing function in eschatological
manuals where she is the main female presence in the Garden (Smith and Haddad 1975,
Jarrar 1993, Jarrar 1999, Jarrar 2003, Wensinck & Pellat 2006, Rosenthal 1987, Mernissi
1986). Like the architecture of the Garden, she becomes more sensual. In al-Muhasibi’s
text, saffron plants awake as she passes them (al-Muhasibi 1978, no. 149), and she
becomes a more active agent who welcomes the male believer to his palace and new way
of living. In fact, in al-Qadi’s manuals, houri even have a retinue of girls who attend
them and even the teeth of one of girls is so beautiful that the angel Gabriel mistakes his
vision for the light of God (al-Qadi 1977, p. 80–1).
The heightened amplification in the eschatological manual produced two textual
legacies. The first is that the bejeweled splendor of the Garden had become extraordinary
and formulaic. As a result, a definite esthetic vocabulary emerged in the manuals. The
ª 2010 The Author
Journal Compilation ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Religion Compass 4/3 (2010): 166–175, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00199.x
Early Views of Paradise in Islam
173
vocabulary may have been evident in the Qur’an and elaborated in the hadiths, but it
was in the manuals where the full vision of the Garden was identified. It is for this reason
that often the visions of the Garden that emerge in contemporary Arabic works draw
more upon the categorization and narrative form of eschatological manuals than merely
the verses and hadiths. Second, the manuals also developed the motifs of the Garden in
forms that are still employed today. For example, the tree Tuba becomes a more prominent image in miniature painting, and the invocation of houris as virginal also becomes
commonplace (Jarrar 2006).
If the Garden was one of the identifiers in early Islamic texts, then it is the genre
of the eschatological manual that gave architectural form to the Garden. In an effort to
produce works that allowed readers to reflect upon worldly choices and to satisfy their
curiosity about the world to come, eschatological writers created a reflection of the
Garden that was completely bejeweled and structured for the pleasures of the individual
believer (Rustomji 2009). It is within the genre of the eschatological manual that Paradise
becomes the realm of the individual. For that reason rewards for individual believers,
such as the houris, become privileged. This focus on the individual reward leads to some
contemporary misperceptions. For example, it is commonly held that martyrs receive
houris upon entry into the Garden; however, within traditions, all male believers if they
have led righteous lives have access to houris (Rustomji 2007). The ambiguity in the
Qur’an and the mentions in hadiths about the landscape and social world were expanded
in a narrative about the end of time, and it is through that narrative form that the Garden
became a formalized detailed, material place.
Conclusion
While the idea of and belief in Paradise had a significant impact in the lives of Muslims
during the early centuries of Islam, it was not a place that was fully elaborated in the
Qur’an and early biographical literature. With the development of the Garden in prophet
literature, traditions about the Islamic afterworld became more expansive and reflected
the concerns and aspirations of Muslims who were curious about their lives in the next
world. The elaboration in the traditions was employed by writers of eschatological manuals who took traditions and structured them into fairly coherent narratives and settings. It
is within these narratives about the end of time that Paradise in Islam developed an
esthetic form. Studies about the relation of this esthetic form and its correspondences to
earthly lived experience are still at an early stage. There are still many avenues of exploration such as how various theological and philosophical positions are related to otherworldly imagery, how notions of Paradise within Shi’ism and Sufism are distinctive, and
how notions of Paradise develop from the 15th to 18th centuries. The early views of
Paradise in Islam may have been formative, but it is also the later views that have shaped
the ways that Muslims understand their afterworlds today.
Short Biography
Nerina Rustomji specializes in the cultural and intellectual formation of Islamic societies
and the Middle East. Her book The Garden and the Fire: Heaven and Hell in Islamic Culture
(Columbia University Press, 2009) narrates a history of heaven and hell in Islamic texts,
material cultures, and book arts from the seventh century CE. The book demonstrates that
otherworldly realms have histories that are shaped by Muslims’ ethical formulations,
esthetic sensibilities, religious reform, and unending impulse to contemplate the everlasting
ª 2010 The Author
Journal Compilation ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Religion Compass 4/3 (2010): 166–175, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00199.x
174 Nerina Rustomji
future. Her current research, which has received fellowship support from the American
Council of Learned Societies and the American Center of Oriental Research (Amman,
Jordan), examines how contemporary Muslims and American and European media represent one of the most sensational tropes about Islam: pure female companions or houris in
Islamic Paradise. Before joining St John’s University in 2006, she taught at Bard College.
She holds a BA in History and Middle Eastern Studies from the University of Texas,
Austin and a PhD in History from Columbia University.
Note
* Correspondence address: Prof. Nerina Rustomji, St John’s University, History Department, 8000 Utopia
Parkway, Queens, New York, NY 11439, USA. E-mail:
[email protected].
Works Cited
Abdel Haleem, Muhammad (1999). Understanding the Qur’an: Themes and Styles. London: Tauris.
al-Azmeh, Aziz (1995). Rhetoric of the Senses: A Consideration of Muslim Paradise Narratives, Journal of Arabic
Literature, 26, pp. 215–31.
—— (1991). Mi’radj: In Arabic Literature In: P. Bearman, Sheila S. Blair, and Jonathan M. Bloom (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Islam, online edition. Images of Paradise in Islamic Art. Austin, University of Texas Press.
Berg, Herbert (2000). The Development of Exegesis in Early Islam: The Authenticity of Muslim Literature from the Formative Period. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.
al-Bukhari, Muhammad b. Isma’il (1976). The Translation of the Meanings of Sahih al-Bukhari: Arabic–English, 4 vols.
Trans. Muhammad Muhsin Khan. Chicago: Kazi Publications.
Chittick, William C. (1987). Eschatology. In: Seyyed Hossein Nasr (ed), Islamic Spirituality: Foundations, pp. 378–
409. New York, Crossroad.
Cook, David (2003). Studies in Muslim Apocalyptic. Princeton: Darwin Press.
Cook, Michael A. (2004). Eschatology and the Dating of Tradition. In: Harald Motzki (ed.), Hadith: Origins and
Developments, pp. 217–41. Aldershot: Ashgate Valorium.
Crone, Patricia (1987). Meccan Trade and the Rise of Islam. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
—— & Cook, Michael (1977). Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eklund, Ragnar (1941). Life Between Death and Resurrection According to Islam. Uppsala: Wiksells Boktryckeri-A-B.
El-Zein, Amira (2006). Water of Paradise. In: Jane Dammen McAuliffe (ed), Encyclopaedia of the Qur’an, online
edition. Leiden: Brill.
Gardet, L. (2007a) Djanna. In: P. Bearman, T. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs
(eds.), Encyclopaedia of Islam, online edition. Leiden, Brill, 2007.
al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid Muhammad al-Tusi (1979). The Precious Pearl (Al-durra al-fakhira). Trans. Jane Idelman
Smith. Missoula: Scholar’s Press.
—— (1989). The Remembrance of Death and Afterlife (Book XL from the Revival of Religious Sciences – Ihya ‘ulum
al-din of al-Ghazali) Trans. T. J. Winter. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society.
Hawting, Gerald (1999). The Idea of Idolatry and the Rise of Islam: From Polemic to History. New York, Cambridge
University Press.
Homerin, T. Emil (1985). Echoes of a Thirsty Owl: Death and Afterlife in Pre-Islamic Arabic Poetry, Journal of
Near Eastern Studies, 44(3), pp. 165–84.
Ibn Habib, ‘Abd al-Malik (1987). Wasf al-firdaws. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyya.
Ibn Ishaq, Muhammad (1955). The Life of Muhammad: A Translation of Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah. Trans. A. Guillaume. London: Oxford University Press.
Ibn Warraq (2002). What the Koran Really Says: Language, Text, Commentary. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Jarrar, Maher (1993). ‘Masari’ al-‘ushshaq’: Dirasa fi ahadith fadl al-jihad wa ‘al-hur al-‘ain’ al-Abhath, online edition
Ed. Ramzi Baalbaki. Beirut: American University of Beirut.
—— (1999). The Martyrdom of Passionate Lovers: Holy War as a Sacred Wedding. In: Angelika Neuwirth et al.
(eds.) Myths, Historical Archetypes, and Symbolic Figures in Arabic Literature: Towards a New Hermeneutic Approach: Proceedings of the International Symposium in Beirut, June 25th–June 30th, 1996. pp. 88–107. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner
Verlag.
—— (2006). Houris. In: Jane Dammen McAuliffe (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the Qur’an. Leiden, Brill.
Luxenberg, Christoph (2000, 2007 English Translation). Syro-Aramaic Reading of the Koran: A Contribution to the
Decoding of the Language of the Koran. Berlin: H. Schiler.
Mernissi, Fatima (1986). Women in Moslem Paradise. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
ª 2010 The Author
Journal Compilation ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Religion Compass 4/3 (2010): 166–175, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00199.x
Early Views of Paradise in Islam
175
Motzki, Harald (2003). The Question of the Authenticity of Muslim Traditions Reconsidered: A Review Article.
In: Herbert Berg (ed.), Method and Theory in the Study of Islamic Origins, pp. 211–57. Leiden and Boston, Brill.
al-Muhasibi, al-Harith ibn Asad (1978). Une vision humaine des fins dernières: Le kitab al-tawahhum d’al-Muhasibi.
Trans. André Roman. Paris: Librairie Klincksieck.
Muslim, Hajjaj b. (1999). Sahih Muslim, Arabic English, 8 vols. Trans. Abdul Hameed Siddiqui. Delhi: Adam
Publishers.
al-Qadi, ‘Abd al-Rahim ibn Ahmad (1977). Islamic Book of the Dead: A Collection of Hadiths on the Fire and the Garden. Trans. Aisha Abdurrahman Bewley. Norwich, England: Diwan Press.
Qur’an (1989). The Meaning of the Holy Qur’an. Trans. ‘Abdullah Yusuf Ali. Beltsville, MD: Amana Publications.
al-Qurtubi, Muhammad ibn Ahmad (1980). Al-tadhkira fi ahwal al-mawta wa’umur al-akhira. Cairo: Maktaba al-Kulliyat al-Azhariya.
Reinhart, A. Kevin (1991). The Here and the Hereafter in Islamic Religious Thought. In: Sheila S. Blair and
Jonathan M. Bloom (eds.), Images of Paradise in Islamic Art, pp. 15–23. Austin, University of Texas Press.
Robinson, Neil (1996). Discovering the Qur’an: A Contemporary Approach to a Veiled Text. London: SCM Press.
Rosenthal, Franz (1987). Reflections on Love in Paradise. In: John H. Marks and Robert M. Good (eds.), Love and
Death in the Ancient Near East: Essays in Honor of Marvin H. Pope, pp. 247–54. Gilford, CT, Four Quarters.
Rustomji, Nerina (2007). American Visions of the Houri, Muslim World, 97(1, January) pp. 79–92.
—— (2009). The Garden and the Fire: Heaven and Hell in Islamic Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
al-Samarqandi, Ahmad ibn Muhammad (1966). Paradise (Selections from Kitab haqa’iq wa-l-daqa’iq). Trans. J. Macdonald, Islamic Studies, 5, pp. 331–83.
Schoeler, Gregor (2006). The Oral and the Written in Early Islam. Trans. Uwe Vagelpohl. Ed. James E. Montgomery.
London and New York: Routledge.
—— & —— (1981). Islamic Understanding of the Afterlife. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Stetkevych, Suzanne Pinckney (1997). Intoxication and Immortality: Wine and Associated Imagery in al-Ma’arri’s
Garden. In: J. W. Wright and Everett Rowson (eds.), Homoeroticism in Classical Arabic Literature, pp. 210–32.
New York, Columbia University Press.
al-Tirmidhi, Abu ‘Isa Muhammad (n.d.). Al-jami’ al-sahih, 4 vols. Ed. Ibrahim ‘Atwa ‘Aud. Cairo: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-’Arabi.
Wansbrough, John (1977). Qur’anic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation. London: Oxford University
Press.
—— (1978). The Sectarian Milieu: Content and Composition of Islamic Salvation History. London: Oxford University
Press.
—— (2003). Res Ipsa Loquitur: History and Mimesis. In: Herbert Berg (ed.), Method and Theory in the Study of
Islamic Origins, pp. 3–19. Leiden and Boston, Brill.
Watson, Andrew M. (1974). Agricultural Innovation in the Early Islamic World. Cambridge University Press.
Wendell, Charles. (1974). The Denizens of Paradise. In: Herbert W. Mason et al. (eds.), Humaniora Islamica, 2, pp.
29–59. The Hague, Mouton.
Wensinck, A. J. & Pellat, C. (2006). Hur. In: P. Bearman, T. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Zaki, and W. P.
Heinrichs (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Islam, online edition.
ª 2010 The Author
Journal Compilation ª 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Religion Compass 4/3 (2010): 166–175, 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00199.x