Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
1 page
1 file
Research on ambiances and atmospheres* has largely contributed to making explicit the role of sensitive phenomena in space, perceptual modalities and affects in the construction of social life. Deriving from an aesthetic thought to ecological approach, and focusing on the forms of situated experience, most of these works reveal how ambiances/atmospheres affect the tones and forms of social life. However, one can also witness a lack for consideration of the societal challenges – as well as of the political and moral issues – that are necessarily carried out by the physical and sensory transformations of our living conditions. Some are more problematic than others. These transformation could take into consideration some "atmospheric properties" that surround situations, intend to give these a "tone" that is more or less " warm " and engaging; place individuals in "states", may these be of confidence or of destabilization; put dwellers at risk or, on the contrary, enhance our capabilities to play an active part within society; sometimes put at risk our feeling of belonging to the same "common world" or our ability to welcome the 'Other'. How is it possible to understand these sensory experiences, without questioning, evaluating and even criticizing the value of the ambiances/atmospheres in which they take place? This session aims at questioning the possibility of reconciling descriptive approaches of mundane social life (attentive to its sensitive, emotional and atmospheric/ambient dimension), with critical approaches? In other words, how can the sensory, affective, atmospheric research convey issues of social and political criticism? We invite papers that address the above points within themes including:-Thinking together an ecology of places and an ecology of ambiances/atmospheres, or even a political ecology of ambiances/atmospheres-What could be an ambiance/atmosphere-based critique? What could be the objects of this ambiance/atmosphere-based critique?-Theoretical and empirical relationship with critical theory?-The role of ambiance/atmospheres in creating situations of unrest, symbolic violence and marginalization? How do they contribute to the creation of "sidelining?-What do ambiances/atmosphere do to the mundane body and senses?-How do atmospheres participate in the production and duplication of "alienations", indispositions to action, impossibilities of engagement and sharing?-Political uses of ambiances/atmospheres-Ambiances/atmospheres and spaces of consumption Please send a paper title and 250-word abstract to [email protected] and
2020
How does the notion of “infinite places” allow us to question the production of a contemporary architectural space? For creators, what are the new challenges for the design of the atmospheres of these new forms of public space? This article aims to bring together the urban practices identified by the Encore Heureux collective with a praxeological thought of the design of atmospheres. Infinites places trough ambiance are analyzed in their potentials to create infinite conflicts, infinite negotiations and infinite sympathies between the back plan and the emerging events.
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2011
2012
This paper questions the potential criticism offered by the concept of ambiances. By defending three postures of research (to articulate the sensitive and politics, to defend an ethics of the commitment, to translate and share the common), it puts the foundations of a sensitive criticism of the urbanity.
International Political Sociology, 2015
What might thinking about atmospheres add to our understandings of politics? How might this provocation open up other characters, venues, objects, and purposes in the study of politics (Magnusson 2011:1)? In The Politics of Urbanism (2011), Warren Magnusson invites us to challenge our accounts of politics by seeing like a city . In doing so, he claims that we are more likely to be able to see a multiplicity of political authorities and political spaces, which in turn complicate a sovereign and statist account of politics (Magnusson 2011:4). But what happens when we shift or expand the emphasis from acts of seeing to acts of feeling , to follow the ways in which bodies are affected by senses, chemicals, rhythms, and sounds—aligning some people with others and against other others (Ahmed 2004)? The concept of atmospheres encourages us to think about the ways in which moods, ambiance, and feelings play an important role in political life. A political moment or movement is often experienced as a “structure of feeling” (Williams 1977) or “moody force field” (Amin and Thrift 2013:161) before it can be explained as (and reduced to) a rational, conscious decision (Anderson 2009). I will point to three ways in which thinking about atmospheres challenges and expands our studies of politics by drawing on a literary text—specifically, a novel by Hanif Kureishi called The Black Album (1995). Literary texts intervene in this question of what counts as politics by questioning the “carving up of space and time, the visible and invisible, speech and noise” (Shapiro 2010; Ranciere 2011:4). Working with a novel thus …
Literature and Aesthetics, 2013
We are always in atmospheres. Every where has, is an atmosphere. We are always affected by atmosphere, more or less consciously, more or less intensively. A crowded street, an open field, night, a moment of anticipatory tension, a jubilant throng, the aroma of freshly-turned earth on a green hillside in the rain in the sombre stillness of a funeral, a post-coital haze, a boring seminar in a white box-shaped room. However neutral or benign a space is designed to be, however unconsciously or habitually dwelt, it has, it is, atmosphere. If space is anything more than volumetric void, ideal abstraction, or pure potential, it is atmosphere. Certainly, if space, as opposed to place, can be experienced, it is as atmosphere. This article outlines a phenomenological-performative methodology for the apprehension of atmospheres, based in the work of Hermann Schmitz and Gernot Böhme. It examines the concept of atmosphere in detail, and proposes a practical application in a site-specific performance project conducted in urban environments. Ultimately, it claims a role for performance phenomenology as a means of providing a more in-depth, body-centred analysis of the aesthetic experience of being in place than is attainable by other means.
2019
By recognizing the potential of literary language in the description of architectural atmospheres, this contribution aims to confront the shortcomings of conventional pedagogical approaches in architecture that often fail to provide an in-depth understanding of the experiential aspects of place. To contribute to the development of appropriate instruments of analysis and design to read and describe urban atmosphere, this article combines two main insights: first, that it is of crucial importance to investigate site-specific atmospheres to understand how people experience the urban territories they use or inhabit; and second, that it is through literary devices that atmospheres can be read and described. By bringing together these insights, this article aims to propose pedagogical exercises that help students of architecture to develop a better understanding of the experiential aspects of site-specificity. By adding to the conventional tools of architect and planners a set of tools in...
Social and Cultural Geography
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2015
In this paper, I propose to explore a new way of designing and experimenting with the city. How are we to conceptualize the changes in contemporary cities on the basis of their ambiances? What about the sensory and emotional production of urban territories? What happens when our aim is no longer just to design space but also to install an atmosphere? Such questions are situated at the intersection of issues of a social, aesthetic, urban, ecological and political nature. I should like to advance a hypothesis: we are currently witnessing what I call the 'setting of ambiance' in urban spaces. To give an account of this phenomenon, I do not intend to offer a formal definition of what an ambiance may be, but rather to show from what it proceeds, on what it is based, what it produces and transforms in urban life. Several ambiance operating modes in the province of urban design will be the focus: establishing the sensory as a field of action, composing with affective tonalities, giving consistency to urban situations, maintaining spaces over time and playing with imperceptible transformations.
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2014
URBAN AMBIANCES AS COMMON GROUND? I would like to start with an expression: 'sharing ambiances' 1. There are at least two meanings underlying such an expression. On the one hand, we can question whether it is possible to share ambiances and ask ourselves whether an ambiance can always be shared, whether certain conditions must be met for an ambiance to be shared, whether what is 'shareable' takes on a particular expression when it is viewed through the lens of ambi-ances… These are what we can call 'experienced ambiances', ambiances as they are experienced by the senses. But we can also share conceptions about the idea of ambiances and test the extent to which it is possible to agree on the notion of ambiance, initiate a debate on the meaning and contribution of such a concept, experiment with types of dialogue between different disciplinary fields, etc. We can call these: 'reflective ambiances', i.e., ambiances as they are addressed by thought. To question the shared experience of an ambiance and open up the notion of ambiance for debate is quite simply two sides of the same coin: the two facets of sharing ambiances. This involves the potential crossover between the field of sensory experience and that of reflective thought, the continuity between empirical and theoretical realms. Here, we are already at the heart of the enigma since ambiances play on both sensing and knowing, and involve a certain I-do-not-know-what (je-ne-sais-quoi as commented by Vladimir Jankélévitch 2) that can never be fully resolved. Like Saint Augustine with time, everyone has experiences with ambiances in everyday life and yet we have a lot of trouble explaining exactly what they are. In order to avoid an overly general and abstract argumentation, I will rely on short descriptions, lived experiences and concrete situations throughout the text. This
2020
The limits of sensory apprehension can take different forms: phenomena can be so tenuous that they do not necessarily reach consciousness; habit can bring them out as missing; they can also manifest only in a delayed manner, primarily through their sensory consequences; and finally, devices – such as a digital display – can bring them back into the realm of human perception. This paper first seeks to explore their integration into the lived ambiances, especially from the contem- porary geophysical and climatological expla- nations. Then it questions how architecture and urban design can, through new attention to these limits of the phenomenal, contribute to the readability of the world and collective response-abilities at the time of the entry of humanity into the Anthropocene.
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 2021
Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review (RJSSER)
Reading for ENEM: leitura e compreensão textual em língua inglesa, 2022
The Ukrainian Week, 2024
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2017
SARCOPENIA AND COGNITIVE DECLINE IN THE ELDERLY: A LITERATURE REVIEW TAILORING THE MUSCLE-BRAIN AXIS (Atena Editora), 2024
Journal of emerging technologies and innovative research, 2021
Ingeniería Hidráulica y Ambiental, 2018
Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 2017
International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2020