VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017
http://www.joell.in
RESEARCH ARTICLE
IMPACTS OF PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT ON IRANIAN EFL STUDENTS’
READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY BASED ON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
ENGLISH TEXTBOOK (PROSPECT 2)
Fatemeh Amani1, Hadi Salehi2*
1&2*
(English Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.)
E-mail:
[email protected]
ABSTRACT
The studies about the use of portfolio assessment in foreign language teaching
show that the portfolio assessment improves writing skills; however, foreign language
skills are not limited to writing skill alone. Reading, speaking and listening skills are also
important. Portfolio provides the students with the opportunity to see themselves as
with special interests and needs in reading skill. The aim of this study is to examine the
impact of portfolio as a descriptive assessment method on the development of Iranian
EFL students' reading comprehension ability based on junior high school English
textbook, Prospect 2. To this end, 20 Iranian EFL students all female from a guidance
school were selected. The control group members (n=10) received traditional
assessment and the experimental group members (n=10) received the portfolio
assessment based on Prospect 2. Two reading comprehension tests as pretest and
posttest were given to the students of both groups to find out their reading
comprehension ability at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. In order to
perform statistical analysis, descriptive and inferential statistical methods were applied.
The results of the study did not show the superiority of portfolio method over
o e tio al s ori g
ethod i the de elop e t of the stude ts’ readi g
comprehension. The results have some implications and suggestions for assessment,
teaching and learning.
Keywords: Assessment, Portfolio Assessment, Reading Comprehension, Prospect 2.
Citation:
APA
MLA
Amani,F & Salehi,H. (2017) Impacts of Portfolio Assessment on Iranian EFL “tude ts’ Reading
Comprehension Ability Based on Junior High School English Textbook (Prospect 2).Veda’s
Journal of English Language and Literature-JOELL, 4(4), 69-84.
Amani, Fatemeh and Hadi Salehi. Impacts of Portfolio Assessment on Iranian EFL “tude ts’
Reading Comprehension Ability Based on Junior High School English Textbook (Prospect 2). Veda’s
Journal of English Language and Literature JOELL, Vol.4, no.4, 2017, pp.69-84.
Copyright © 2017 VEDA Publications
Author(s) retain the copyright of this article
Author(s) agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License 4.0 International License
.
69
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
2*
VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017
http://www.joell.in
1. INTRODUCTION
Reading is the basis of learning other
cognitive skills. It is a process through which letters,
symbols, and signs obtain meaning with the ultimate
goal of achieving the abilities to read, comprehend,
and criticize a text. The most important part of this
process is comprehension. Lerner (1997) has argued
that o prehe sio i ol es reader’s og iti e
transaction with the text and the reader has to be
able to bridge the gap between newly given data and
his/her previously existing knowledge. If we are to
enhance reading skills, there is no way but to change
the teaching-learning methods of reading skills and
their assessment. In recent years, a reform has
happened in the era of evaluation. It is the shift from
testing to assessment. Assessment, in the broad
se se,
ea s a
ethods used to etter
understand the current knowledge that a student
possesses Colli s& O’Brie ,
, p. 9 . A ordi g
to Crooks
, assess e t is a pro ess that
provides
information
about
the
thinking,
a hie e e t or progress of stude ts
p.
.
Designing assessment is a skilful art because it
requires the assessor to have an understanding of
the content of the knowledge, the syllabus, and the
level (Gomez, 1999). Today, there are innovations in
assessment procedures, where the change is from
summative assessment to formative assessment. One
of the significant methods in formative assessment
system is portfolio. According to Archbald and
Newman (1992, p. 169), "a portfolio is a file or folder
containing a variety of information that documents a
stude t’s e perie es a d a o plish e ts .
Teachers that have paid attention to the process of
learning as well as to the products of that learning
evident in the portfolio collection can assess
stude ts’ a ilities, skills a d k o ledge to a uratel
evaluate, whether or not their teaching is preparing
the students for the real world (Batzle, 1992). There
is a wide body of theoretical research that
recommends the use of portfolio in EFL classrooms
(Hedge, 2000; Rea, 2001). For some teachers, the
portfolio is part of an alternative assessment
program, and it can either include a record of
stude ts’ a hie e e ts or si pl do u e t their
best work. For other teachers, the portfolio
do u e ts the stude ts’ lear i g pro ess, a d still
70
others use it as a means of promoting learner
reflection. Despite all efforts and costs of foreign
language teaching in Iran, students suffer from
difficulties in language learning skills. The problem
appears to be in educational system that teachers,
traditionally, do their best to teach 'what to think'
rather than 'how to think' effectively about the
subject matters which is termed as critical thinking
(Shuffersman, 1991).
Therefore, the main question in this study is
that whether there would be a significant difference
in reading comprehension of students, if the
traditional quantitative methods of evaluations are
replaced by qualitative methods such as portfolio.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Portfolio assessment has been adopted in
many subject areas and accepted in a variety of
contexts so that many descriptions of portfolio exist.
Portfolio approaches to assess literacy have been
described in a wide verity of publications (Flood &
Lapp, 1989; Valencia, 1990a; Hamps-Lyons, 1996).
The studies about the use of portfolio assessment in
foreign language teaching largely show that they
improve writing skills. But, foreign language skills are
not limited to writing skill alone. Reading, speaking
and listening skills are also important. Yurdabakan
and Erdogan Tolga (2009) considered the effect of
portfolio assessment on reading, listening and writing
skills of secondary school language preparatory class
students. The findings showed that portfolio
assessment had significant influence on students'
writing skills; The findings of this research are in
contrast with that of Delgoshaei, Khrrazi and Talkhabi
(2011) that demonstrated the using portfolio as an
evaluation method leads to the improvement of
reading skills.
2.1 PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT
Writers like Chen (1993), Fenwick and
Parsons (1999), Singer (1993) and Wolf (1989) have
stated that portfolio assessment is effective in
foreign language teaching and listed the strengths of
this assessment approach as below: Portfolio
assessment helps students to find appropriate
learning contexts for themselves; assists the students
to identify their goals for their future learning; gives
them the opportunity to take responsibility for their
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
2*
VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017
http://www.joell.in
own learning ; enables the teacher to identify
effective language teaching strategies and so on.
2.2 ASSESSING READING COMPREHENSION
For assessing reading comprehension,
Alderson (2000) suggested two techniques of
summary and information transfer. Indeed, in
transforming information the learners transfer what
they have known from the texts to a table, a chart
and the other types of graphs. According to the
results of so many studies (e.g. Alyusef, 2005;
McKeown, Beck, Black, 2009; Xie, 2010), EFL students
suffered merely from a multitude overlooked
difficulties in reading comprehension. In order to
sol e EFL lear ers’ readi g o prehe sio pro le s,
some assessments such as PA in which qualitative
reading research examines the process of reading
comprehension is significant.
2.3 PROSPECT 2
Prospect 2 from the series English for
schools is part of a six-year program that is designed
to help Iranian students learn English for
communicative purposes using all the four skills of
listening, speaking, reading and writing. The students
have a workbook and a student book. The book
entitled "Prospect 2" written by Alavimoghadam et
al. (2014).
2.4 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The review of literature shows that in
traditional assessment, the rate of failure, emotional
disorder and unhealthy competition is increasing and
students' interest for leaning is decreasing. Of course,
most of these problems stem out of exam, anxiety
and fear, and from testing without taking into
accou t the stude ts’ i di idual differe es “eif,
2009). Typically, traditional assessment is used only
to o itor stude ts’ lear i g. U der this odel,
stude ts ho k o
are separated
those ho
do
ot k o . I
other
ords, traditio al
assessment creates a system that classifies and ranks
students (Berlak,1992).
An assumption of alternative assessment is
that it is ea i gless to atte pt to assess a
perso ’s a ilities e ept i relatio to their alued
goals .There are
a
ki ds of alter ati e
assessment like portfolio assessment, play-based
assessment, conference assessment, and so on
(Raven, 1992, p. 89). The present study was an
71
attempt to promote reading skills of the students by
encouraging them to use portfolio. Portfolio
assessment provides an opportunity for EFL/ESL
learners to monitor their own reading progress, their
own learning strategies and take responsibility for
meeting goals. Portfolio assessment can help learners
to investigate their own strength and weakness
points.
2.5 RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES
Based on the mentioned problem, the
researcher attempted to answer the following
questions:
RQ1: Does portfolio assessment have any effect on
Iranian EFL students 'reading comprehension ability
based on junior high school English textbook?
RQ2: How does portfolio assessment help students
self-monitor their own learning and become more
autonomous?
RQ3: What are the stude ts’ attitudes to ards the
portfolio assessment and their improvement in
reading comprehension ability?
RQ4: Is there any significant difference between the
impact of traditional testing method and portfolio
assess e t o EFL stude ts’ readi g o prehe sio
ability based on junior high school English textbook?
Based on the research questions of this study,
the following hypotheses were formulated:
H01: Portfolio assessment has no effect on Iranian
EFL stude ts’ readi g o prehe sio a ilit ased
on junior high school English textbook (Prospect 2).
H02: There is no significant difference between the
impact of traditional testing method and portfolio
assess e t o EFL stude ts’ readi g o prehe sio
ability based on junior high school English textbook.
2
METHOD
3.1 PARTICIPANTS
The population was all female students in
eighth grade in Iranian junior high school who
received portfolio assessment. Convenience sampling
was used in this study. The researcher selected a
time and a place for a study, announces this to the
students, and then uses those who show up as
participants. The participants were 20 female
students in eighth grade (in Iranian school system
there is no female teacher in junior high school for
boys). The participants were selected from two
classes and each class had almost 10 students. They
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
2*
VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017
http://www.joell.in
were divided into three groups of experimental,
control and pilot each with 10 students. Both of two
control and experimental groups were almost equal
regarding their general proficiency level and reading
comprehension ability at the beginning of the study T
.hey were between 13-15 years old. These students
were in junior high school in Shahrekord city in Iran.
They were taught by the same teacher.
3.2 MATERIALS
3.2.1 TOEFL PROFICIENCY TEST
In order to ensure the homogeneity of the
participants regarding language proficiency, a TOEFL
test was administered to the participants. This test
was adopted from TOEFL primary practice tests
(reading and listening) step1 and step 2 books (see
Appendix A) . The test consisted of two parts:
vocabulary (10 items), reading comprehension (15
items), which was totally 25 items; it took students
about 25 minutes to respond. The researcher pointed
for each item one score (the total raw score=25 for
each participant).
3.2.2 READING COMPREHENSION TEST
The second test was reading comprehension
test. The Gaj and Khattesefid junior high school
workbooks were employed to carry out the test. The
test consisted of five reading comprehension texts
which included twenty one reading comprehension
items and seven vocabulary items. The items were
given to the participants to be answered as pretest
and posttest. They required the participants to read
the guidelines in English and Persian and answer the
questions (see Appendix B). In order to ensure
validity and reliability, first of all, the researcher
reviewed the relevant literature and examined the
test designed for similar purposes. The content
validation form required the experts to rate each
item of the test based on two criteria of the
appropriateness of the item in representing the
topic, and the clarity of the meaning of the item. The
face validation form required the experts to judge
about the components of visual appeal, quality of
instructions to respondents, scoring format, page
layout, number of sections, number of items,
wording of items, relevance of items to the context,
and length of time needed to answer the test. The
reading comprehension test had 28 items and it took
students about 25 minutes to respond. The
72
researcher pointed for each item one score (the total
raw score=28 for each participant).
3.2.3 PORTFOLIO MODEL
The procedures for preparing portfolio were
following issues: planning the assessment purposes,
corresponding the purposes with instructional
objectives, forming criteria for assessment,
developing checklist based on the criteria, integrating
portfolio into class and activities, introducing the idea
of portfolio assessment to the students, its
justifications, necessary components, the how of
assessment, monitoring the portfolio during the
treatment and finally evaluating the final portfolio.
The evaluative portfolio was used in this research.
Students added their products to their portfolios. All
the students' tasks and activities were collected in
their portfolio and they had self-assessment on their
portfolio during the treatment. There was peer
assessment for some activities through the
treatment; the researcher evaluated the students'
portfolio in the experimental group.
3.2.4 THE ATTITUDE QUESTIONNAIRE
This questionnaire was adopted and related
to the topic under study and then it was modified
according to the needs and its usability by the
researcher. All of the items in the questionnaire were
adopted from Rahmani and Kashlouli (2012) and they
were modified in line with the objectives of this study
(see Appendix C).
3.2.5 ANALYTIC SCORING RUBRIC
A TOEFL English proficiency test was
administered to ensure the homogeneity of the
participants. It consisted of 25 items. The time
allotted to take this test was 25 minutes and the
scoring was estimated out of 25. This test was
administered to both treatment and control group.
The reading comprehension test was administered as
the pre-test and post-test. The test included 28
items. The score procedure for items in pretest and
posttest was from 28 and the time allotted to take
this test was 25 minutes. For the analysis of these
scores, descriptive statistics, t-test and independent
sample test were carried out to consider all aspects
of the study. Reading comprehension pre-test and
post-test was given to both treatment and control
group. The reliability of the test scores was estimated
through Cronbach's Alpha as (r= .86).
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
2*
VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017
http://www.joell.in
3.3 PROCEDURE
Before conducting the main study, a pilot
study was conducted on a group of 10 students who
had the same proficiency level as the main
participants of the pretest study. The purpose of
piloting was to predict the needs in the main study
and to determine the time needed for answering the
questions and to check the reliability of the tests. The
experimental procedures of the study were
summarized as follow: One proficiency test was given
to the students of both groups (experimental and
control) to see their levels and to make sure their
homogeneity. Also two reading comprehension tests
as pretest and posttest were given to the both
groups to find out their reading comprehension
ability at the beginning and at the end of the
instruction and treatment. The views of prominent
educators and English teachers were asked about the
test to ensure that the test was valid. The reliability
of the test was confirmed with a calculated Kronbach
Alpha Coefficient. During the 12-week experimental
study, traditional testing method was used in the
control group, whereas portfolio assessment was
used in the experimental group. The researcher
herself was the teacher in both groups. The
researcher asked a reading comprehension portfolio
of students in experimental group. At the beginning
of the treatment, the instructor explained about the
design, goal and procedure of portfolio assessment.
The researcher began with writing a definition and
goals of portfolio assessment for learners in the
experimental group. The researcher explained other
types of alternative assessment such as selfassessment and peer assessment and their
significance in the process of collecting portfolios.
The students in the experimental group and their
parents informed about the process of portfolio
assessment. The researcher decided to use the
folders for the lear ers’ portfolios. The resear her
taught students based on junior high school English
text book for one semester. The researcher prepared
suitable reading comprehension tasks based on
junior high school English textbook once a week. The
students updated their portfolios by completing
them. The portfolio contents included activity guides,
group projects, individual projects and so on. At the
end of semester, students in the experimental group
73
took the contents of their portfolios for a
presentation to a small group of teachers, other
students and outside observers. At the end of
semester, the students in the experimental group
were asked to write answers to some questions
about their opinions on portfolio assessment which
contains 25 different questions regarding to the
effect of portfolio assessment on reading
comprehension ability based on Prospect 2.
4. RESULTS
Independent Samples t-Test on the
Proficiency Test indicates that Sig was more than
0.05; it thus means that the difference between the
proficiency levels of the two groups was not
significant t(18) = -1.48, p= 0.15. In line with the
purpose of the study which is considering the effect
of portfolio assessment on reading comprehension
ability, the researcher investigated the students'
mean scores in the posttest. The differences between
treatment and control groups were not significant.
For considering the details of the research, the
students in each group were divided into two low
achievers and high achievers groups based on their
scores in proficiency test and pretest. The level of
significance for low-achievers was more than 0.05;
the difference between two groups in low achievers
level was not significant, t (8) = 0.5, p= 0.95. The level
of significance for high-achievers was more than
0.05, and thus the difference between two groups in
the high achievers level was not significant, t(8)=
0.63, p= 0.60. This means that experimental group
didn't perform better than control group and there is
no significant difference between the impact of
traditional testing method and portfolio assessment
on EFL students' reading comprehension ability based
on Prospect 2. By considering the results of the items
of the questionnaire, we can see that the portfolio
assessment based on Prospect 2 helped the students'
self-monitor their learning and the students had
positive attitudes towards it.
5. DISCUSSION
According to the findings, the answer to the
first research question, "Does portfolio assessment
have any effect on Iranian EFL students 'reading
comprehension ability based on junior high school
English textbook?" is "No". The results of data
analysis in chapter four revealed that the difference
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
2*
VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017
http://www.joell.in
is not statistically significant. As a result, it could be
concluded that experimental group members did not
perform much better than control group members on
the posttest and this was the answer for the first
research question. These findings are in agree with
those of Yurdabakan and Erdogan Tolga (2009) that
considered the effect of portfolio assessment on
reading, listening and writing skills of secondary
school language preparatory class students. They
analyzed the scores of students in both control group
and treatment group. The findings showed that
portfolio assessment had significant influence on
students' writing skills; The findings of this research
are in contrast with that of Delgoshaei, Khrrazi and
Talkhabi (2011) that demonstrated the using
portfolio as an evaluation method leads to the
improvement of reading skills. This study examined
the impact of portfolio on the development of firstgrade stude ts’ og iti e skills i readi g. The results
of the study showed the superiority of portfolio
method over conventional scoring method in the
de elop e t of the stude ts’ og iti e skills of
reading. The findings of this study are in agreement
with the existing studies in the literature which
revealed that portfolio assessment methods have no
effect on Iranian EFL students 'reading
comprehension ability. As the results show, the
answer to the second research question," Is there
any significant difference between the impact of
traditional testing method and portfolio assessment
o EFL stude ts’ readi g o prehe sio a ility
based on junior high school English textbook?" is
"No". These findings are not in line with the results of
Charvade, Jahandar and Khodabandehlou (2012) that
found there was a significant difference between the
impact of portfolio assessment and traditional
assess e t o EFL lear ers’ readi g o prehe sio
ability and portfolio assessment has a positive effect
o EFL lear ers’ readi g o prehe sio a ilit .
reading comprehension ability based on junior high
school English textbook (Prospect 2); and there is no
significant difference between the impact of
traditional testing method and portfolio assessment
o EFL stude ts’ readi g o prehe sio a ilit
based on junior high school English textbook.
However portfolio is an effective instructional
technique as well as assessment tool and can help
students to improve self-confidence. The students
can use portfolio to self-monitor their growth and
their problems. By using portfolio the positive results
that were found could be summarized as: positive
reactions of both teachers and students toward
portfolios; positive attitude increases toward learning
in classes where portfolios are in practice; evidence
on portfolios being more successful than traditional
tests
in
assessing
student
achievements;
i pro e e t of stude ts’ riti g skills a d positi e
ha ges i stude ts’ stud
a s; i rease i
stude ts’ taki g respo si ilit of their o
lear i g;
improvement i stude ts’ higher order thi ki g skills,
critical thinking skills, problem solving strategies, and
self-evaluation abilities; and evidence towards
portfolios role in improving communication among
students, teachers, administrators, and parents.
REFERENCES
[1]. Alderson, J. C., & Backman, L. F. (2000). Assessing
reading. Cambridge University Press. The Edinburgh
Building, Cambridge CB22RU, UK.
[2]. Ali, S. Y. (2005). An Introduction to Electronic
Portfolios in the Language Classroom. The Internet
TESL Journal, XI (8).
[3]. Archbald, D. A. &Newmann, F. M. 1992. Approaches to
Assessing Academic Achievement. In Berlak et al.
Toward a New Science of Educational Testing and
Assessment. Albang, NY: State University of New York
Press. 161-229.
[4]. Batzle, J. (1992). Portfolio Assessment and Evaluation:
6. CONCLUSION
Developing and Using Portfolio in theClassroom.
Based on the findings of the current study,
portfolio assessment has no positive effect on
students' reading comprehension ability. To meet
this end, different tests and a questionnaire were
used in the research study. The findings of the study
confirmed two null hypotheses and showed that
portfolio assessment has no effect on EFL stude ts’
Cypress, CA: Creative Teaching Press.
74
[5]. Berlak, H. (1992). The Need for a New Science of
Assessment. In H. Berlak and others (eds). Toward a
New Science of Educational Testing and Assessment.
Albany: State University of NewYork. Retrieved from
books.google.com
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
2*
VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
http://www.joell.in
[6]. Chen, L. (1993). Portfolios in second and foreign
(EFL).Iranian
language classroom assessment. Retrieved October
Journal of
English
for Academic
Purposes, 1(3).
21, 2005 from http://spectrum.troy.edu/~lchen/papers/
[18]. Raven, J. (1992). A Model of Competence, Motivation,
portfolio.doc.
and Behavior, and a Paradigm for Assessment. In H.
[7]. Collins, J., & O ‘Brien, N. (2003). The Greenwood
Berlak and others (eds.), Toward a New Science of
Dictionary of Education. USA, Westport: Greenwood
Educational Testing and Assessment. Albany: State
Press. September, 2001. Retrieved February 24, 2007,
University of New York.
from:
[19]. Schafersman, S. D. (1991). An introduction to
critical thinking. Retrieved March 3, 2008 from
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001862.ht
www.freeinquiry.com/critical.html
m
[8]. Crooks,
T.
(2001).The
Validity
of
[20]. Seif, A. (2009). Educational Evaluation and Assessment.
Formative
Tehran: Roshd Publishing Company.
Assessment. Paper Presented to the British Educational
[21]. Singer, S. (1993). Portfolio Assessment in Foreign
Research Association Annual Conference, University of
Language, Pilot Project. Evansville-Vanderburgh School
Leeds, 13-15.
Corp., Ind. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.
[9]. Delgoshaei, Y., Kharrazi,K., &Talkhabi,M.(2011). The
ED368197). Retrieved from ERIC database.
Impact of Portfolio Evaluation Method on the
Development of Children’s Reading Skills. Procedia,32.
[22]. Valencia, S. W. (1990a). A Portfolio Approach to
publication.
Classroom Reading Assessment: the Whys, Whats, and
[10]. Fenwick, T. J. & Parsons, J. (1999). Using portfolios to
[23]. Wolf, D.P. (1989). Portfolio Assessment: Sampling
356-360.
Elsevier
Hows. The Reading Teacher, vol.43, 338-340.
doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.053.
Student Work. Educational Leadership, 46 (7), 35-39.
assess learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service
[24]. Yurdabakan, I., & Erdogan, T. (2009). The effects of
No. ED428398). Retrieved from ERIC database.
[11]. Flood, J., & Lapp, D. (1989) Reporting Reading
portfolio assessment on reading, listening and writing
Progress: A Comprehension Portfolio for Parents. The
skills of secondary school preparatory class students.
Reading Teacher, vol. 42, 508-514.
The Journal of International Social Research, 2 (9),
526-538.
[12]. Gharvade, R. M., Jahandar, SH., &Khodabandelou, M.
(2012).The Impact of Portfolio Assessment on EFL
[25]. Xie, x. (2010). The Influence Of Schema Theory on
Learners’ Reading Comprehension Ability. English
Forign Language Reading Comprehension, the English
language teaching,5.doi:10.5539/elt.v5n7p129.
Teacher, 34, 67-75.
[13]. Gomez, E. L. (1999). Assessment Portfolio and English
Language Learners: Frequently Asked Questions and a
Case Study of the Brooklyn International High School.
Educational Alliance, LAB at Brown University, under
Contract Number. RJ96006401.
[14]. Hamp-Lyons, L. (1996) Applying Ethical Standards to
APPENDIX A: TOEFL READING COMPREHENSION
PROFICIENCY TEST
Look at the picture. Read the words. Which
sentences or words go with the picture?
Portfolio Assessment of Writing in English as a Second
Language. In M. Milanovic and N. Saville (eds.)
Performance Testing,
Cognition and
Assessment.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.151–162.
[15]. Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language
classroom. Oxford: oxford university press.
[16]. Lerner, J. W. (1997). Learning disabilities: Theories,
diagnosis, and teaching strategies. Boston: Houghton
Mifflin Company.
1(A) The boy is drawing the picture.
[17]. Rahmani, N., &Kashlouli, S. M. (2015).The Effect of
75
Portfolio Assessment on Reading Comprehension
(B) The boy is taking a photo.
Ability of Intermediate Learners as a Foreign Language
(C) The boy is talking on the phone.
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
2*
VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
http://www.joell.in
2 The boy with the arrow is…..
5
(A) Ahead
(A) Bird
(B) Beside
(B) Butterfly
(C) Under
(C) Bee
3
6
(A) The boy is last in line.
(A) Pencil
(B) The boy is waiting in front of the school.
(B) Eraser
(C) The boy is talking to a friend.
(C) Ruler
4
(A) The car is going up a hill.
(B) The car is at the top of a hill.
(C) The car is going down a hill.
7
(A) The girl is talking to someone.
(B) The girl is writing a letter.
(C) The girl is wearing a hat.
76
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
2*
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017
VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
http://www.joell.in
8
11
(A) He is carrying a basket of apple.
(A) They baked a cake.
(B) He is picking some apples from a tree.
(B) They put the ice cream in a bowl.
(C) He is eating an apple under a tree.
(C) They ate dessert.
9
(A) Long
(B) Proud
(C) Loud
12
(A) Train
(B) Taxi
(C) Bus
10
(A) Empty
(B) A lot
(C) Enough
13
(A) Coat
(B) Dress
(C) Hat
77
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
2*
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017
VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017
http://www.joell.in
(A) A notebook
(B) A pen
(C) A envelope
14
Read the sign. Answer questions 19 to 22.
(A) Same
(B) Alone
(C) Different
15
(A) She is reading from a book.
19 Where can you go to buy plant food?
(B) She is sitting at a desk.
(A) The playground
(C) She is writing on a board.
(B) A classroom
READ AND FIND THE ANSWER.
16 . Students go to class here. Teachers work here. It has many
desks.
What is it?
(C) A garden
20. You a
u
oth flo ers a d …….
(A) Seeds
(A) a house
(B) Vegetables
(B) A school
(C) Flower pictures
(C) a bank
21. Where is the flower sale?
17. People work here. They can grow corn and other vegetables
here. Sometimes, pigs, cows, and goats live here.
(A) In a garden
What is it?
(B) At a school
(A) A zoo
(C) At someone's home
(B) A farm
22. When is the flower sale?
(C) A market
(A) On a weekend
18. You use it when you send a letter to someone. It is made of
paper. You write a street address on it.
(B) In the winter
(C) During a holiday
What is it?
78
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
2*
VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017
http://www.joell.in
READ ABOUT HOW THE CHILDREN HELP AT HOME.
ANSWER QUESTIONS 23 TO 25.
24.Who empties the trash on Friday?
(A) Asher
(B) Veronika
(C) Byron
23.What does Asher do on Wednesday?
25.When does Asher wash the dishes?
(A) Empty the trash
(A) Monday
(B) Wash the dishes
(B) Wednesday
(C) Clean the bedroom
(C) Friday
Answer Sheet for Proficiency Test:
79
1
b
14
C
2
a
15
C
3
a
16
B
4
a
17
B
5
c
18
c
6
c
19
b
7
a
20
c
8
c
21
b
9
c
22
a
10
a
23
a
11
a
24
c
12
a
25
a
13
a
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
2*
VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
http://www.joell.in
APPENDIX B: PRETEST/ POSTTEST
Name:
Class:
A)
Match the phrases with questions.
1234-
Where do you cook?
Where do the wild animals come from?
When do you often wake up?
Who reads story books for you?
B)
Read and find the answer.
5
A TV program for children:
a) radio
b) news c) cartoon
Age:
a) before sunrise
b) in the kitchen
C)Africa
d)my mother
d) television
6
People buy everything they need here:
a) zoo
b) mosque c) office d) store
7
Half a hour ago, it as te to te . No it’s………….
a) eleven twenty
b) half past eleven
c) a quarter past eleven
d) twenty to eleven
C)
Read this dialogue and then answer the questions.
S1: Hello, Kumi. Can you tell me about your hobbies?
“ : sure. I lo e pai ti g. I’ pai ti g a pi ture for
u
o .
“ : That’s lo el . You’re good at pai ti g. Do ou like usi , too?
S2: Yes, I do. I listen to music every evening.
S1: and sports? Do you play volleyball or tennis?
“ : No, I do ’t like sports. I do ’t pla olle all or te is.
S1: I see. I hope your mum likes the picture.
8- What’s Ku i's ho
?
a)
reading
b)painting
9- When does she listen to the music?
a)
in the free time
c)computer games
b)in the weekend
10-What is Kumi doing for her mother?
a)
shopping
b)cleaning a picture
80
c)every evening
c)painting a picture
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
2*
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017
VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017
http://www.joell.in
D) Match the sentences with the correct answer.
11- My friend and I usually go to the park for walking. We love playing chess in the park, too.
a) Negin b) Pooya
c) Kamran
12- I like Persian. So I read story books and poems a lot.
a) Ali b) Sogol
c) Maryam
13- I have a new digital camera. So every weekend, I take many photos.
a) Babak b) Ramin
c) Mrs.Jafari
14- There is a big river near our village. So my hobby is going fishing on weekends.
a) Ramin
b) Ali
c) Kamran
E) Read the text and complete the sentences.
I’ Ja k. I’
ears old a d I’ a tea her. M frie ds a d I ha e differe t ho ies. I usuall pla te is o
Monday and Wednesday evenings and read books on Friday mornings. Bob is a doctor. He likes mountain
climbing and watching movies in his free time on Tuesday and Thursday afternoons. Nick and Oliver are
engineers. They usually go horse riding on Tuesday mornings. Nick enjoys listening to the radio on Friday
mornings but Oliver likes reading sports news on the net.
15-Ja k reads ooks ………..
16-Oli er …………..
17-Bo at hes TV ………………..
18-Ni k …………..o Tuesda or i gs.
a) rides horse
b) on Tuesday and Thursday afternoons
c) on Friday mornings
d) likes reading sports news
F (complete the sentences with the correct word.
19- We get good …….. fro Ta riz.
(a- cheese
b-sweet c-tea)
20- Good a a as o e fro …….. of Ira .
(a-north
b-south
c-west)
21- Rasht is fa ous for its ……….. .
(a-pistachio
b-rice
81
c-sweet)
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
2*
VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017
http://www.joell.in
22- We get good saffro fro ……….. .
(a-Ahwaz
b-Tehran
c-Ghayenat)
23- There are a lot of ………. i the far .
(a-cars
b-sun flowers
c-bridges
24- Paria has got ………... she should rest.
(a-the flu
b-a toothache c-stomachache)
G) Read this text and select the best answer.
M a e is Clara. I’ sixteen years old. My family and I live in Great Missenden. It is a big, clean and pretty
village near London. My father is a fire fighter. He works at Tottenham Fire station in London. It is on 10
Seagrave Street. My mother is a nurse. She works in the Royal London Hospital on White Chapel Road. My
parents work on shifts. My mother takes a bus to work, but my father drives to work.
25-Clara is …… ears old.
a) 15
b) 17 c) 16 d) 18
26-The li e i ……... .
a) Missenden
b) London
c) Tottenham
d)White Chapel
27- ………….. is o
“eagra e “treet.
a) The hospital
b) The fire station
c) Their house
d) The bus station
28-Great Missende is a ……….
a) big city
b)big village
c)small city
d) small village
Answer Sheet for Pretest/Posttest:
82
1
b
15
c
2
c
16
a
3
a
17
b
4
d
18
d
5
c
19
a
6
d
20
b
7
a
21
b
8
b
22
c
9
c
23
b
10
c
24
a
11
b
25
c
12
c
26
a
13
a
27
b
14
b
28
b
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
2*
VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017
http://www.joell.in
APPENDIX C: SAMPLE OF QUESTIONNAIRE IN ENGLISH
This questionnaire involves two kinds of questions. The questions (1-2-4-8-9-11-12-13-14-15-17-18-21-22-2425) are students' perceptions and the questions (3-5-6-7-10-16-19-20) are the questions that related to
students' self-monitor.
Strongly Agree (S.A),
Agree (A),
No. decided,
Disagree (D), and Strongly Agree (S.D)
No.
Lear ers’ Reactio to the Effect of Portfolio Assess e t
on Reading Comprehension Ability
1
I have intimate knowledge of the definition of portfolio
and its assessment in the classroom.
2
The primary purpose of portfolio assessment is increasing
reading abilities and comprehending different texts in a
wide variety of subjects.
3
My needs in improving and progress in different texts
were obviated by portfolio assessment.
4
Classroom activities were specially designed based on my
needs and resolving my problems in improving my
abilities in reading different texts.
5
Portfolio is a collection which shows my progress, efforts,
and also the rate of my success during a term.
6
As an active learner, my progress was assessed during a
term by my teacher and my-self.
7
I observe my progress in different reading comprehension
abilities from beginning to end.
8
My vocabulary knowledge is increased by portfolio
assessment and reading different texts in a wide variety
of
subjects.
9
Compared with traditional methods and previous terms,
lear ers’ progress a d i pro e e t are ore assessed i
different times.
10
According to successive assessment, portfolio assessment
gives me more opportunities to check and eliminate my
weak points in learning and improvement.
11
Portfolio assessment provides perfect opportunities to
collect and choose different texts.
83
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
S.A
2*
A
No.
decided
D
SD
VEDA’S
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOELL)
An International Peer Reviewed Journal
http://www.joell.in
12
Co pared to traditio al
my final grade.
13
My final grade clearly shows the effect of portfolio
assessment on reading comprehension abilities.
14
The significant effect of port folio assessment on my final
grade during a term highly motivates me to use portfolio
assessment.
15
By the use of portfolio, reading different texts are not as
tedious and time-consuming as before.
16
After familiarity with portfolio, compared to the previous
terms I read different texts in a short time.
17
Portfolio assessment increases my sense of competition.
18
Portfolio assessment creates a sense of responsibility in
my learning.
19
Increasing sense of responsibility helps me to diagnose
my
weak points in learning process.
20
I know all about my strength and weak points by portfolio
assessment.
21
I have a positive attitude towards portfolio assessment.
22
Portfolio assessment is one of the highly effective
methods.
23
Carrying out portfolio studies show my real progress and
also enhance my self-confidence.
24
Learning and reading comprehension in different texts
and
subjects are more exciting for me by portfolio
assessment.
25
Applying different methods and skills increase my
motivation and also motivate me to make tremendous
efforts in learning English.
84
ethods, I’
ore satisfied ith
1
Fatemeh Amani , Hadi Salehi
2*
Vol.4 Issue 4
2017