" Tethering " means tying an animal up, like a horse or dog, so that its movement is restricted. Typically this feat is accomplished by means of a bridle (horse) or collar (dog) attached to the tether which is secured to the ground or other objects by various means. The big idea is that the tethered animal is restricted from free movement and may be subjected to inhumane captivity by deprivation of water, shelter, food, or even mental isolation. Yet tethering of domestic animals has been done for thousands of years. Somehow, though, by the orchestration of self-serving humaniacs and their thoughtless minions, it is construed as " cruelty " , mostly when applied to dogs so far. How did we get to this point? What is the purpose of tethering actually? Basically, because most animals, like dogs, lack good judgment and the experience to know how to stay out of trouble, tethering in the past and present has been done for the animals' own safety. By tethering, they are prevented from attacking other animals or people, running off, or getting killed by accidents and intentional killing by one individual to protect their livestock, pets, or family from another individual's animals. Tethering is also a means of restricting the animals' wandering and providing accountability for its location, as well as maintaining it in the owner's property in the absence of fences or areas with easy access. In as much as most dogs are quite athletic, the prevention of the tethering option restricts dog ownership to people with very secure yards surrounded by high, unclimbable fences, kennels with lids of some type, or the necessity of keeping the dogs inside at all times except when walked on a leash. So people who may not have these options are now restricted from dog ownership which includes most of the country. Many areas don't allow dogs in apartments or leased homes, good kennels are quite expensive (and nearly as restrictive as tethering), and truly dog-proof fences are seldom found around the average home. Dog cables are another option but are quite tricky to get right. And implementing this type of security is quite unnecessary most of the time for a number of reasons. First and foremost, tethering need not be " cruel ". Good tethering practices can use chains 15' or more in length. The construction of the tether is the most important consideration. Unfortunately it is apparently much easier to simply throw a blanket over a perceived problem than to educate the public about a particular practice, in this case tethering. For instance, one should obviously never use a rope or other type of material that a dog can easily chew through as a " tether ". Generally, a good chain of a strength proportionate to the size and strength of the dog is perfectly adequate for a tether. In addition, the collar requires careful thought and consistent checking. Leather collars, for instance, can stretch with time (unlike polyester collars), allowing the dog to eventually escape. The best practice is to use 2 collars attached by a single link. The link, in turn,