Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Review "Att fostra en elit".pdf

AI-generated Abstract

Petter Sandgren's study investigates the historical development and transnational spread of elite boarding schools, particularly focusing on the case of Sweden. The work challenges methodological nationalism by highlighting the complex interplay between England and various European countries in shaping these institutions. The study identifies two main educational models: the traditional Eton-Rugby model and the progressive Abbotsholme/Bedales model, both of which have significantly influenced Swedish boarding schools. Sandgren argues that these schools played a crucial role in merging older wealth with the financial bourgeoisie in Sweden, a theme that will be further explored in a planned trilogy.

60 Reviews Dovemark, M. Ansvar – Flexibilitet – Valfrihet: En etnograisk studie om en skola i förändring. Göteborg: Acta universitis Gothoburgensis, 2004. Mulderrig, J. “he Grammar of Governance.” Critical Discourse Studies 8 (2011), 45–68. Mulderrig, J. “he Hegemony of Inclusion: A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of Deixis in Education Policy.” Discourse and Society 23 (2012), 701–28. Mulderrig, J. “Enabling Participatory Governance in Education: A Corpus-Based Critical Policy Analysis.” In nternational Handbook of Interpretation in Educational Research, edited by P. Smeyers, D. Bridges, N. Burbules & M. Griiths, 441–70. London and New York: Springer, 2015. Salokangas, M., C. Chapman, and D. Beach. “Independent State-Funded Schools and System Change: Adressing Educational Equity.” In Equity and education in cold climates in Sweden and England, edited by D. Beach and A. Dyson, 193–208. London: Tufnell Press, 2016. Dennis Beach University of Gothenburg Email: [email protected] Monographs Petter Sandgren Internatskolorna: Att fostra en elit Stockholm: Atlantis Bokförlag 2015, 298 pp. I n August 2013 the oldest, still active Swedish Boarding School, Lundsberg was at the forefront of Swedish national media. Behind the interest were reports of deeply humiliating forms of hazing. hese incidents also form the prelude to Petter Sandgren’s study of how this form of boarding school was exported from England over the seas, within the Empire as well as outside it. he case of Sweden is devoted a particular attention. As the author shows, the export was not executed in any easily identiiable one-way direction. he formation of the originally British form of elite boarding schools in Western Europe and USA was rather the result of intricate webs of exchange between diferent countries. England did not only serve as an exporting country, but was also in turn inspired by other countries. Sandgren hereby not only aims to give a more comprehensive historical perspective on the phenomenon, but also to avoid the pitfalls of what Ulrich Beck has referred to as methodological nationalism. he ambition is thus primarily to complement the hitherto more common national perspective. he material on which the author draws is extensive; apart from memoirs and letters from the initiators of the boarding schools, he draws widely on iction, arguing that it was an essential source of inspiration when the boarding schools irst started to spread. A clear indication of this is the event that he has chosen as his point of departure for the analysed expansion: the publication of homas Hughes’ Tom Brown’s Schooldays in 1857. In mapping how the system spread within the British Empire and back and forth between diferent states outside the Empire, particularly between England, France, Germany, Switzerland and USA, Sandgren makes an important empirical contribution. he expansion, he argues, drew on two diferent boarding school models: the “traditional Eton-Rugby model” and the progressive “Abbotsholme/Be- Reviews dales-model” (the two latter were themselves founded in the late nineteenth century). Common for both models was the strong emphasis on physical training. However, in what concerned the content of teaching and methods used they difered. In contrast to the traditional methods in the “Eton-Rugby model”, with their emphasis on classical languages, the “progressive schools” tended to emphasise placing the pupil in the centre of the teaching process. he latter also tended to stress modern languages at the expense of the classicist ditto. Both tendencies, argues Sandgren, have been highly present in the Swedish boarding schools; indeed, Lundsberg could in relevant respects be considered to have been one of the most progressive schools – in what concerns the aims and the teaching methods – in Sweden between the irst and second world war. More important than these diferences were, however, the shared emphasis on letting the pupils, at the time primarily boys, bring up each other. In virtue of the global perspective applied, he convincingly shows how this dimension imbues most of the boarding schools analysed in his study. he empirical indings and relections presented in the study are generally well situated within relevant ields of research. In combination with the vast array of themes on which Sandgren touches, this gives a very solid impression. An issue that nevertheless leaves me slightly puzzled is the contextualisation of the self-governance in disciplinary questions. When discussing this, the author relates to other studies within the ield of masculinity studies, but he does not in one word mention initiation rites in other contexts (such as, e.g., in criminal gangs, or the insemination rites from older to younger men within certain tribes). he absence of this is all the more surprising since the ritual dimension is a recurrent theme in the study. he disposition of the book enables the author to weave together the global perspective with the more speciic Swedish case, smoothly shiting from the former to the latter. An elucidating example of this is how he in the concluding chapter skilfully manages to synthesise the two perspectives in a historically well contextualised relection over 61 the current exportation of boarding school brands over the world. he book is a popularized version of Sandgren’s dissertation, and it is planned to become the irst part of a trilogy over elites in modern Sweden. In light of this overarching aim, the convincingly argued idea that the Swedish boarding schools have been pivotal in the fusion of the “older” money with the upper stratum of the inancial bourgeoisie during the turn of the century seems particularly relevant. As the author argues, a robust, nationally rooted network has been and still is a crucial aspect of the reproduction of the elite. In the forthcoming two volumes it will be interesting to see how the results here presented will be related to changes in other upper strata of society. More speciically, I am thinking of those that for their positions have depended on educational merits and primarily are operating in the cultural and educational sphere – not at least in light of the thorough changes that the educational system has underwent the last 40 years. A related question is how the overarching theme could be related to the devaluation of and increasingly anxious relation to the culture within the contemporary Swedish bourgeoisie, an issue addressed in for example the recently published anthology Varken bildning eller piano. A hereto related issue, on which some authors in the latter study touches, is the self-images of the bourgeoisie and how the term itself ought to be considered in relation to the more passive – and presumably politically telling – denomination “middle class”. A thorough analysis relating the Swedish case to the diferent comparative studies in this ield would seem to it neatly with Sandgren’s transnational project. Whether or not these issues will be followed up, the empirical indings and proposed interpretations in this study are perfectly justiied in themself. For anyone interested in historical and sociological perspectives on educational issues, Sandgren’s book will certainly be of interest. Tomas Wedin University of Gothenburg Email: [email protected]