Bibliography on 2 Peter and Jude (1983-2013)

Bibliography on 2 Peter and Jude (3/2013) Wolfgang Grünstäudl This bibliography, which was originally prepared for a lecture held at the University of Palermo in 2012 (many thanks to Pia Gerards for her help!), lists books and articles published since 1983, when Richard Bauckham’s groundbreaking commentary was released. It does not contain book reviews, commentaries, lexicon articles and smaller contributions in handbooks. If you think something should be added or corrected, just send an email to [email protected]. Accounts of Research (Jude): Heiligenthal, R., Der Judasbrief. Aspekte der Forschung in den letzten Jahrhunderten, in: ThR 51 (1986), 117–129. – Bauckham, R. J., The Letter of Jude. An Account of Research, in: ANRW II,25,5 (1988), 3791–3826. – Müller, P., Der Judasbrief, in: ThR 63 (1998), 267–289. Accounts of Research (2 Peter): Bauckham, R. J., 2 Peter. An Account of Research, in: ANRW II,25,5 (1988), 3713–3752. – Gilmour, M. J., 2 Peter in Recent Research. A Bibliography, in: JETS 42 (1999), 673–678. – Müller, P., Der 2. Petrusbrief, in: ThR 66 (2001), 310–337. – Webb, R. L., The Petrine Epistles. Recent Developments and Trends, in: McKnight, S. /Osborne, G. R. (eds.), The Face of New Testament Studies. A Survey of Recent Research, Grand Rapids/Leicester 2004, 373–390. Accounts of Research (Jude and 2 Peter): Mills, W. E., 2 Peter and Jude (Bibliographies for Biblical Research. New Testament Series 19), Lewiston/Queenston/Lampeter 2000. – Pearson, B., James, 1-2 Peter, Jude, in: Epp, E. J./MacRae, G. W. (eds.), The New Testament and Its Modern Interpreters (SBL.CP), Philadelphia 1989, 371–406 (covers only literature until 1979!). – Watson, D. F., Rhetorical Criticism of Hebrews and the Catholic Epistles Since 1978, in: CRBS 5 (1997), 175–207. Thematic Studies (Jude): Ahrens, M., Der Judasbrief – eine neutestamentliche Marginalie, in: Texte und Kontexte 22 (1999), 39–49. – Allen, J. S., A New Possibility for the Three-Clause Format of Jude 22–3, in: NTS 44 (1998), 133–143. – Alomia, M., Cristología en la Epístola de Judas, in: DL 7 (2008), 73–99. – Bartholomä, P. F., Did Jesus Save the People out of Egypt? A Re-examination of a Textual Problem in Jude 5, in: NT 50 (2008), 143–158. – Bauckham, R., Jude and the Relatives of Jesus in the Early Church, Edinburgh 1990. – Bauman-Martin, B., Postcolonial Pollution in the Letter of Jude, in: Webb, R. L./Davids, P. H. (eds.), Reading Jude with New Eyes. Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Jude (LNTS 383), London/New York 2008, 54–80. – Birdsall, J. N., The Text of Jude in P72, in: Collected Papers in Greek and Georgian Textual Criticism (TaS.ThS 3), Piscataway 2006, 73–77. – Blumenthal, C., Prophetie und Gericht. Der Judasbrief als Zeugnis urchristlicher Prophetie (BBB 156), Göttingen 2008. – Brooke, G. J., Torah, Rewritten Torah and the Letter of Jude, in: Tait, M./Oakes, P. (eds.), The Torah in the New Testament. Papers Delivered at the Manchester-Lausanne Seminar of June 2008 (LNTS 401), London/New York 2009, 180–193. – Brosend, W., The Letter of Jude. A Rhetoric of Excess or an Excess of Rhetoric?, in: Interp. 60 (2006), 292–305. – Buono, A. M., A Golden Letter. The Epistle of Jude. A Jewel of the New Testament, in: Homiletic and Pastoral review 89 (1988), 59–62. – Caulley, T., Balaak in the P 72 Text of Jude 11. A Proposal, in: NTS 55 (2009), 73–82. – Charles, J. D., Jude’s Use of Pseudepigraphical Source-Material as Part of a Literary Strategy, in: NTS 37 (1991), 130–145. – Charles, J. D., Literary Artifice in the Epistle of Jude, in: ZNW 82 (1991), 106–124. – Charles, J. D., Literary Strategy in the Epistle of Jude, Scranton 1993. – Charles, J. D., Polemic and Persuasion. Typological and Rhetorical Perspectives on the Letter of Jude, in: Webb, R. L./Davids, P. H. (eds.), Reading Jude with New Eyes. Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Jude (LNTS 383), London/New York 2008, 81–108. – Charles, J. D., The Use of Tradition-Material in the Epistle of Jude, in: BBR 4 (1994), 1–14. – Charles, J. D., ‘Those’ and ‘These’. The Use of the Old Testament in the Epistle of Jude, 1 in: JSNT 38 (1990), 109–124. – Cozijnsen, B., A Critical Contribution to the Corpus Hellenisticum Novi Testamenti. Jude and Hesiod, in: Rutgers, L.V. et al. (eds.), The Use of Sacred Books in the Ancient World (CBET 22), Leuven 1998, 79–109. – Dehandschutter, B., Pseudo-Cyprian, Jude and Enoch. Some Notes on 1 Enoch 1:9, in: Van Henten, J. W. (ed.), Tradition and ReInterpretation in Jewish and Early Christian Literature. FS Jürgen C. H. Lebram, Leiden 1986,114–120. – deSilva, D. A., The Jewish Teachers of Jesus, James, and Jude. What Earliest Christianity Learned from the Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha, Oxford 2012. – Detering, H., Der Judasbrief – die kirchliche Antwort auf das Judas-Evangelium, in: HoLiCo 24 (2006/2007), 43–47. – Donelson, L. R., Jude as Text with Excess of Context, in: Mitchell, M. M./Collins, A. Y. (eds.), Antiquity and Humanity. FS Hans Dieter Betz, Tübingen 2001, 279–295. – Dutcher, R., An Unorthodox Argument and Jude’s Non-canonical Source, in: Asian Journal of Pentecostal Studies 11 (2008), 33–43. – Ellis, E. E., Prophecy and Hermeneutics in Jude, in: id. (ed.), Prophecy and Hermeneutics in Early Christianity (WUNT 18), Tübingen 1978, 221–236. – Flink, T., Reconsidering the Text of Jude 5, 13, 15 and 18, in: Filología neotestamentaria 20 (2007), 95–125. – Fossum, K., Kyrios Jesus as the Angel of the Lord in Jude 5–7, in: NTS 33 (1987), 226–243 (reprinted in id. [ed.], The Image of the Invisible God. Essays on the Influence of Jewish Mysticism on Early Christology [NTOA 30], Freiburg 1995, 41–69). – Frey, J., Der Judasbrief zwischen Judentum und Hellenismus, in: Kraus, W./Niebuhr, K.-W. (eds.), Frühjudentum und Neues Testament im Horizont Biblischer Theologie. Mit einem Anhang zum Corpus JudaeoHellenisticum Novi Testamenti (WUNT 162), Tübingen 2003, 180–210 (English version in: Niebuhr, K.-W./Wall, R. W. [eds.], The Catholic Epistles and Apostolic Tradition, Waco 2009, 309–329). – Gunther, J. J., The Alexandrian Epistle of Jude, in: NTS 30 (1984), 549–562. – Hahn, F., Randbemerkungen zum Judasbrief, in: id./Frey, J./Schlegel, J. (eds.), Studien zum Neuen Testament. Band II. Bekenntnisbildung und Theologie in urchristlicher Zeit (WUNT 192), Tübingen 2006, 643–652. – Harm, H., Logic Line in Jude. The Search for Syllogisms in a Hortatory Text, in: Occasional Papers in Translation and Textlinguistics 1 (1987), 147–172. – Hasitschka, M., Ägypten im Neuen Testament. Eine bibeltheologische Skizze, in: PzB 10 (2001), 75–83. – Heiligenthal, R., Die Weisheitsschrift aus der Kairoer Geniza und der Judasbrief. Ein Vergleich zwischen einer umstrittenen jüdischen und einer judenchristlichen Schrift, in: ZRGG 44 (1992), 356–361. – Heiligenthal, R., Zwischen Henoch und Paulus. Studien zum theologiegeschichtlichen Ort des Judasbriefes (TANZ 6), Tübingen 1992. – Hultin, J. F., Bourdieu Reads Jude. Reconsidering the Letter of Jude through Pierre Bourdieu’s Sociology, in: Webb, R. L. /Davids, P H. (eds.), Reading Jude with New Eyes. Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Jude (LNTS 383), London/New York 2008, 32–53. – Hultin, J. F., Jude’s Citation of 1 Enoch, in: Charlesworth, J.-H./McDonald, L. M. (eds.), Jewish and Christian Scriptures. The Function of “Canonical” and “Non-Canonical” Religious Texts (JCTCRS 7), London/New York 2010, 113–128. – Joubert, S. J., Facing the Past. Transtextual Relationships and Historical Understanding in the Letter of Jude, in: BZ 42 (1998), 56–70. – Joubert, S. J., Language, Ideology and the Social Context of the Letter of Jude, in: Neotest. 24 (1990), 335–349. – Joubert, S. J., Persuasion in the Letter of Jude, in: JSNT 58 (1995), 75–87. – Joubert, S. J., When the Dead are Alive! The Influence of the Living Dead in the Letter of Jude, in: HTS 58 (2002), 576– 592. – Kruger, M. A.,Toutois in Jude 7, in: Neotest. 27 (1993), 119–132. – Lambers-Petry, D., Verwandte Jesu als Referenzpersonen für das Judenchristentum, in: Tomson, P. J./ead. (eds.), The Image of the Judaeo-Christians in Ancient Jewish and Christian Literature (WUNT 158), Tübingen 2003, 32–52. – Landon, C., A Text-Critical Study of the Epistle of Jude (JSNT.S 135), Sheffield 1996. – Lockett, D., Purity and Polemic. A Reassessment of Jude’s Theological World, in: Webb, R L./Davids, P. H. (eds.), Reading Jude with New Eyes. Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Jude (LNTS 383), London/New York 2008, 5–31. – Lyle, Jr., K. R., Ethical Admonition in the Epistle of Jude (SBL 4), New York 1998. – Mazich, E., “The Lord Will Come with His Holy Myriads”. An Investigation of the Linguistic Source of the Citation of 1 Enoch 1,9 in Jude 14b-15, in: ZNW 94 (2003), 276–281. – Muddiman, J., The Assumption of Moses and the Epistle of Jude, in: Graupner, A./Wolter, M. (eds.), Moses in Biblical and Extra-Biblical Traditions (BZAW 372), Berlin/New York 2007, 169–180. – Nicklas, T., Der “lebendige Text” des Neuen Testaments. Der Judasbrief in P 72 (P. Bodmer VII), in: ASE 22 (2005), 203–222. – Osburn, C. D., Discourse Analysis and Jewish Apocalyptic in the Epistle of 2 Jude, in: Black, D. A. (ed.), Linguistics and New Testament Interpretation. Essays on Discourse Analysis, Nashville 1993, 287–309. – Oyen, G. van, Is There a Heresy That Necessitated Jude’s Letter?, in: Houtman, A./de Jong, A./Misset-van de Weg, M. (eds.), Empsychoi Logoi. Religious Innovations in Antiquity. FS Pieter Willem van der Horst (AJECAGJU 73), Leiden/Boston 2008, 211–226. – Oyen, G. van., Apocalyptische taal en twist in de gemeente. Het voorbeeld van de Judasbrief, in: Kevers, P./Maex, J. (eds.), Toekomst voor verhalen en rituelen? Op het snijpunt van bijbel en geloofscommunicatie, Leuven 2005, 113–134. – Preston, P., Ambrosius Catharinus’ commentary on the general Epistle of St Jude, in: Reformation and Renaissance review 4 (2002), 217–229. – Reed, J. T. /Reese, R. A., Verbal Aspect, Discourse Prominence, and the Letter of Jude, in: Filología neotestamentaria 9 (1996), 181–199. – Reese, R. A., Writing Jude. The Reader, the Text, and the Author in Constructs of Power and Desire (BIS 51), Leiden 2000: – Ross, J. M., Church Discipline in Jude 22–23, in: ET 100 (1989), 297–298. – Seethaler, P.-A., Kleine Bemerkungen zum Judasbrief, in: BZ 31 (1987), 262–264. – Sellin, G., Die Häretiker des Judasbriefes, in: ZNW 77 (1986), 206–225. – Spitaler, P., Doubt or Dispute (Jude 9 and 22–23). Rereading a Special New Testament Meaning through the Lense of Internal Evidence, in: Bib. 87 (2006), 201–222. – Thurén, L., Hey Jude! Asking for the Original Situation and Message of a Catholic Epistle, in: NTS 43 (1997), 451–465. – Trompf, G. W., The Epistle of Jude, Irenaeus, and the Gospel of Judas, in: Bib. 91 (2010), 555–581. – Wasserman, T., The Epistle of Jude. Its Text and Transmission (CB.NT 43), Stockholm 2006. – Webb, R. L. /Davids, P. H. (eds.), Reading Jude with New Eyes. Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Jude (LNTS 383), London/New York 2008. – Webb, R. L., The Eschatology of the Epistle of Jude and Its Rhetorical and Social Functions, in: BBR 6 (1996), 139–151. – Webb, R. L., The Rhetorical Function of Visual Imagery in Jude: A Socio-Rhetorical Experiment in Rhetography, in: id./Davids, P H. (eds.), Reading Jude with New Eyes. Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Jude (LNTS 383), London/New York 2008, 109–135. – Webb, R. L., The Use of ‘Story’ in the Letter of Jude: Rhetorical Strategies of Jude’s Narrative Episodes, in: JSNT 31 (2008), 53–87. – Wendland, E. R., A Comparative Study of “Rhetorical Criticism”, Ancient and Modern. With Special Reference to the Larger Structure and Function of the Epistle of Jude, in: Neotest. 28 (1994), 193–228. – Wolthuis, T. R., Jude and Jewish Traditions, in: CTJ 22 (1987), 21–41. – Wolthuis, T. R., Jude and the Rhetorician. A Dialogue on the Rhetorical Nature of the Epistle of Jude, in: CTJ 24 (1989), 126–134. Thematic Studies (2 Peter): Adams, E., Creation “out” of and “through” Water in 2 Peter 3:4, in: Van Kooten, G. H. V. (ed.), The Creation of Heaven and Earth. Re-interpretations of Genesis 1 in the Context of Judaism, Ancient Philosophy, Christianity, and Modern Physics (Themes in Biblical Narrative 8), Leiden 2005, 195–210. – Adams, E., The Stars Will Fall From Heaven. Cosmic Catastrophe in the New Testament and its World (LNTS 347), London/New York 2007, 200–235. – Adams, E., ,Where is the Promise of his Coming?‘ The Complaint of the Scoffers in 2 Peter 3.4, in: NTS 51 (2005), 106–122. – Aldrige, R. E., Peter and the “Two Ways”, in: VigChr 53 (1999), 233–264. – Alexander, D. T., Lot’s Hospitality. A Clue to his Righteousness, in: JBL 104 (1985), 289–291. – Aune, D. E., Reconceptualizing the Phenomenon of Ancient Pseudepigraphy, in: Frey, J./Herzer, J./Janssen, M., unter Mitarbeit von Engelmann, M. (eds.), Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in frühchristlichen Briefen (WUNT 246), Tübingen 2009, 789–824. – Badenas, R., Dealing with “Present Truth”. 2 Peter 1:12 Revisited, in: Exploring the Frontiers of Faith. FS Jan Paulsen, Lüneburg 2009, 207–217. – Bauckham, R. J., 2 Peter and the Apocalypse of Peter, in: id. (ed.), The Fate of the Dead. Studies in Jewish and Christian Apocalypses (NT.S 93), Leiden/Boston/Köln 1998, 290–303. – Bauckham, R. J., Pseudo-Apostolic Letters, in: JBL 107 (1988), 469–494. – Bénétreau, S., Évangile et prophétie. Un texte original (1 P 1,10–12) peut-il éclairer un texte difficile (2 P 1,16–21)?, in: Bib. 86 (2005), 174–191. – Berger, K., Streit um Gottes Vorsehung. Zur Position der Gegner im 2. Petrusbrief, in: Van Henten, J. W. (ed.), Tradition and Re-Interpretation in Jewish and Early Christian Literature. FS Jürgen C. H. Lebram, Leiden 1986, 121–135. – Bethge, H.-G., Der Text des ersten Petrusbriefes im Crosby-Schøyen Codex (Ms. 193 Schøyen Collection), in: ZNW 84 (1993), 255–267. – Blumenthal, C., “Es wird aber kommen der Tag des Herrn”. Eine textkritische Studie zu 2 Petr 3,10 (BBB 154), Hamburg 3 2007. – Blumenthal, C., “Göttliche Natur” versus “große Art”. Theologie und Christologie in der fayumischen Übersetzung von 2Petr in P.Mich. 3520, in: ZNW 103 (2012), 272–282. – Blumenthal, C., Hoffnung für die Gegner?. Zur fayumischen Übersetzung von 2 Petr 3 in P.Mich. 3520 und zugleich ein Beitrag zur Rezeptionsgeschichte dieses Briefes, in: ZNW 103 (2012), 111–135. – Callan, T., A Note on 2 Peter 1:19–20, in: JBL 125 (2006), 143–150. – Callan, T., Rhetography and Rhetology of Apocalyptic Discourse in Second Peter, in: Webb, R. L./Watson, D. F. (eds), Reading Second Peter with New Eyes. Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Second Peter (LNTS 382), London/New York 2010, 59–90. – Callan, T., The Christology of the Second Letter of Peter, in: Bib. 82 (2001), 253–263. – Callan, T., The Soteriology of the Second Letter of Peter, in: Bib. 82 (2001), 549–559. – Callan, T., The Style of the Second Letter of Peter, in: Bib. 84 (2003), 202–224. – Callan, T., Use of the Letter of Jude by the Second Letter of Peter, in: Bib 85 (2004), 42–64. – Callan, T., The Syntax of 2 Peter 1:1–7, in: CBQ 67 (2005), 632–640. – Caulley, T. S., “They Promise Them Freedom”. Once again, the ψευδοδιδάσκαλοι in 2 Peter, in: ZNW 99 (2008), 128–138. – Chang, A. D., Second Peter 2:1 and the Extent of the Atonement, in: BS 142 (1985), 52–63. – Charles, D. J., Virtue amidst Vice. The Catalogue of Virtues in 2 Peter 1 (JSNTS 150), Sheffield 1997. – Charles, D. J., The Language and Logic of Virtue in 2 Peter 1:5– 7, in: BBR 8 (1998), 55–73. – Dalton, W. J., The interpretation of 1 Peter 3,19 and 4,6. Light from 2 Peter, in: Bib 60 (1979), 547–555. – Dschulnigg, P., Der theologische Ort des Zweiten Petrusbriefes, BZ 33 (1989), 161–177 (reprinted in: Kowalski, B./Höffner, R./Verheyden, J. [eds.], Studien zu Einleitungsfragen und zur Theologie und Exegese des Neuen Testaments. Gesammelte Aufsätze von Peter Dschulnigg [BiTS 9], Leuven/Paris/Walpole 2010, 411–428). – Dunham, D. A., An Exegetical Study of 2 Peter 2:18–22, in: BS 140 (1983), 40–54. – DupontRoc, R., Le motif de la création selon 2 Pierre 3, in: RB 101 (1994), 95–114. – Elliott, J. H., 2 Peter, in: Martin, R. A. /id. (eds.), James. I-II Peter/Jude (ACNT), Minneapolis 1982, 117–158. – Farkasfalvy D., The Ecclesial Setting of Pseudepigraphy in Second Peter and its Role in the Formation of the Canon, in: SecCen 5 (1985/1986), 3–29. – Fornberg, T., An Early Church in a Pluralistic Society. A Study of 2 Peter, Lund 1977. – Fornberg, T., Balaam and 2 Peter 2:15. ‚They Have Followed in the Steps of Balaam‘ (Jude 11), in: Van Kooten, G. H./Van Ruiten, J. H (eds.), The Prestige of the Pagan Prophet Balaam in Judaism, Early Christianity and Islam (Themes in Biblical Narrative 11), Leiden/Boston 2008, 265–274. – Foulkes, I., Der zweite Brief des Petrus. Wegweiser zu einem “gottgefälligen Leben”, in: Schottroff, L. et al. (eds.), Kompendium Feministische Bibelauslegung, Gütersloh 1999, 708. – Frey, J., Disparagement as Argument. The Polemical Use of Moral Lanuage in Second Peter, in: Zimmermann, R./Van der Watt, J. G., in Cooperation with Luther, S. (eds.), Moral Language in the New Testament. The Interrelatedness of Language and Ethics in Early Christian Writings. Kontexte und Normen neutestamentlicher Ethik/Contexts and Norms of New Testament Ethics II (WUNT II/296), Tübingen 2010, 275–310. – Frey, J., Judgment of the Ungodly and the Parousia of Christ, in: Van der Watt, J. G. (ed.), Eschatology in the New Testament and Some Related Documents (WUNT II/315), Tübingen 493–513. – Frey, J., Retter, Gott und Morgenstern. Metaphorik und Christologie im Zweiten Petrusbrief, in: id./Rohls, J./Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Metaphorik und Christologie (TBT 120), Berlin/New York 2003, 131–148. – Ghiberti, G., I “santi profeti” (Lc 1,70; At 3,21; 2Pt 3,2). La santità nella mediazione della parola di Dio, in: Grasso, S./Manicardi, E. (eds.), “Generati da una parola di verità” (Gc 1,18). FS Rinaldo Fabris, Bologna 2006, 225–234. – Gilmour, M. J., Reflections on the Authorship of 2 Peter, in: EvQ 73 (2001), 291–309. – Gilmour, M. J., The Significance of Parallels between 2 Peter and Other Early Christian Literature (Academia Biblica 10), Atlanta 2002. – Green, E. M. B. /von Uslar-Gleichen, F., Der 2. Petrusbrief neu betrachtet, in: Thiede, C. P. (ed.), Das Petrusbild in der neueren Forschung (MuS 316), Wuppertal 1987, 1–50. – Green, E. M. B., 2 Peter Reconsidered, London 1961. – Green, G. L., ‘As for Prophecies, They Will Come to an End’. 2 Peter, Paul and Plutarch on ‘The Obsolescence of Oracles’, in: JSNT 82 (2001), 107–122. – Green, G. L., Second Peter’s Use of Jude. Imitatio and the Sociology of Early Christianity, in: Webb, R. L. /Watson, D. F. (eds.), Reading Second Peter with New Eyes. Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Second Peter (LNTS 382), London/New York 2010, 1–25. – Grünstäudl, W./Nicklas, T., Ein Mann für alle Fälle. Ausgewählte Petrusdarstellungen in apokryph gewordenen Texten, in: BiKi 67 (2012), 230–234. – Grünstäudl, 4 W., Petrus Alexandrinus. Studien zum historischen und theologischen Ort des Zweiten Petrusbriefes, Dissertation University of Regensburg 2012 (forthcoming 2013 in WUNT II). – Grünstäudl, W., Petrus, das Feuer und die Interpretation der Schrift. Beobachtungen zum Weltenbrandmotiv im zweiten Petrusbrief, in: Neubert. L./Tilly, M. (eds.), Der eine Gott und die Völker in eschatologischer Perspektive (BThSt 137), Göttingen 2013, 183–208. – Harrill, J. A., Stoic Physics, the Universal Conflagration and the Eschatological Destruction of the „Ignorant and Unstable“ in 2 Peter, in: Rasimus, T./Dunderberg, I./ Engberg-Pedersen,T. (eds.), Stoicism in Early Christianity, Grand Rapids 2010. – Harvey, A. E., The Testament of Simeon Peter, in: Davies, P. R./White, R. T. (eds.), FS Geza Vermes. Essays on Jewish and Christian Literature and History (JSOT.S 100), Sheffield 1990, 339–354. – Heckel, T. K., Die Traditionsverknüpfungen des Zweiten Petrusbriefes und die Anfänge einer neutestamentlichen biblischen Theologie, in: Gebauer, R./Meiser, M. (eds.), Die bleibende Gegenwart des Evangeliums. FS Otto Merk (MThS 76), Marburg 2003, 189–204. – Hiebert, D. E., Selected Studies from 2 Peter, in: BS 141 (1984) 43–54. 158–168. 255–265. 330–340. – Hoppe, R., Parusieglaube zwischen dem ersten Thessalonicherbrief und dem zweiten Petrusbrief – ein unerledigtes Problem, in: Schlosser, J. (ed.), The Catholic Epistles and the Tradition (BEThL 176), Leuven, 2004, 433–449 (reprinted in: id. [ed.], Apostel - Gemeinde Kirche. Beiträge zu Paulus und den Spuren seiner Verkündigung [SBAB.NT 47], Stuttgart 2010, 269–284). – Houwelingen, P. H. van, The Authenticity of 2 Peter. Problems and Possible Solutions, in: EJT 19 (2010), 119–129. – Hübner, H., 2 Petr 1,4 – eine Blasphemie, die keineswegs gotteslästerlich ist, in: Pratscher, M./Öhler, M. (eds.), Theologie in der Spätzeit des Neuen Testaments. FS Kurt Niederwimmer (Gutachten und Studien 2), Wien 2005, 67–79. – Jankowski, A., “Omnis prophetia Scripturae propria interpretatione non fit” (2 P 1,20), in: Analecta Cracoviensia 25 (1993), 169–176. – Karrer, M., Petrus im paulinischen Gemeindekreis, in: ZNW 80 (1989), 210–231. – Koperski, V., Knowledge of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Echoes of Paul in 2 Peter, in: Schlosser, J. (ed.), The Catholic Epistles and the Tradition (BEThL 176), Leuven 2004, 461–472. – Kraus, T. J., Die griechische Petrus-Apokalypse und ihre Relation zu ausgewählten Überlieferungsträgern apokalyptischer Stoffe, in: Apocrypha 14 (2003), 73–98. – Kraus, T. J., Grammatisches Problembewusstsein als Regulativ für angemessene Sprachbeurteilung. Das Beispiel der Griechischen Negation und 2 Petr, in: Filología neotestamentaria 14 (2001), 87–99. – Kraus, T. J., Sprache, Stil und historischer Ort des zweiten Petrusbriefes (WUNT II/136), Tübingen 2001. – Kruger, M. J., The Authenticity of 2 Peter, in: JETS 42 (1999), 645–671. – Kuhn, K. A., 2 Peter 3:1–13, in: Interpretation 60 (2006), 310–312. – Lapham, F., Peter. The Myth, the Man and the Writings (JSNT.S 239), London/New York 2003. – Lövestam, E., Eschatologie und Tradition im 2. Petrusbrief, in: Weinrich, W. C. (ed.), The New Testament Age. FS Bo Reicke, Macon 1984, 287–300. – Makujina, J., The “Trouble” with Lot in 2 Peter. Locating Peter’s Source for Lot’s Torment, in: Westminster Theological Journal 60 (1998), 255–269. – Mathews, M. D., The Genre of 2 Peter. A Comparison with Jewish and Early Christian Testaments, in: BBR 21 (2011), 51–64. – Meier, S. A., 2 Peter 3:3–7. An Early Jewish and Christian Response to Eschatological Skepticism, in: BZ 32 (1988), 255–257. – Miller, J. C., The Sociological Category of ‘Collective Identity’ and Its Implications for Understanding Second Peter, in: Webb, R. L./Watson, D. F. (eds.), Reading Second Peter with New Eyes. Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Second Peter (LNTS 382), London/New York 2010, 147–177. – Miller, R. J., Is There Independent Attestation For the Transfiguration in 2 Peter?, in: NTS 42 (1996), 620–625. – Miller, T. A., Dogs, Adulterers, and the Way of Balaam. The Forms and Socio-rhetorical Function of the Polemical Rhetoric in 2 Peter (Part 1), in: IBSt 22 (2000), 123–144. – Neyrey, J. H., The Apologetic Use of the Transfiguration in 2 Peter 1:16–21, in: CBQ 42 (1980), 504–519. – Neyrey, J. H., The Form and Background of the Polemic in 2 Peter, Dissertation Yale University 1977. – Neyrey, J. H., The Form and Background of the Polemic in 2 Peter, in: JBL 99 (1980), 407–431. – Norelli, E., Au sujet de la première réception de 1 Pierre. Trois exemples, in: Schlosser, J. (ed.), The Catholic Epistles and the Tradition (BEThL 176), Leuven 2004, 327–366. – Norelli, E., Pierre, le visionnaire. La réception de l’épisode de la transfiguration en 2 Pierre et dans l’Apocalypse de Pierre, in: Cahiers bibliques de foi et vie 46 (2007), 19–43. – Norelli, E., Situation des apocryphes pétriniens, in: Apocrypha 2 (1991), 31–83. – Paulsen, H., Kanon und Geschichte. Bemerkungen zum Zweiten Petrusbrief , 5 in: id../Eisen, U. E. (eds.), Zur Literatur und Geschichte des frühen Christentums. Gesammelte Aufsätze (WUNT 99), Tübingen 1997, 154–161. – Pearson, B. A., The Apocalypse of Peter and Canonical 2 Peter, in: Goehring, J. E. (ed.), Gnosticism and the Early Christian World. FS James M. Robinson, Sonoma 1990, 67–75. – Picirilli, R. E., Allusions to 2 Peter in the Apostolic Fathers, in: JSNT 33 (1988), 57–83. – Porter, S. E. /Pitts, A. W., “τοῦτο πρῶτον γινώσκοντες ὅτι” in 2 Peter 1:20 and Hellenistic Epistolary Convention, in: JBL 127 (2008), 165–171. – Reese, R. A., Narrative Method and the Letter of Second Peter, in: Webb, R. L./Watson, D. F. (eds.), Reading Second Peter with New Eyes. Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Second Peter (LNTS 382), London/New York 2010, 119–146. – Riedl, H. J., Anamnese und Apostolizität. Der Zweite Petrusbrief und das theologische Problem neutestamentlicher Pseudepigraphie (RSTh 64), Frankfurt u.a. 2005. – Ruf, M. G., Ein neuer Versuch den Petrus-Code zu knacken. Der zweite Petrusbrief als allographische Fortsetzung, in: Becking, B./Merz, A. (eds.), Verhaal als identiteitscode. FS Geert Van Oyen (Utrechtse Theologische Reeks 60), Utrecht 2008, 256–259. – Ruf, M. G., Die heiligen Propheten, eure Apostel und ich. Metatextuelle Studien zum zweiten Petrusbrief (WUNT II/300), Tübingen 2011. – Ruf, M. G., Uitleg inbegrepen. De benadering van gezaghebbende teksten in de tweede brief van Petrus, in: NedThT 64 (2010), 316–329. – Schenke, H.-M. in Zusammenarbeit mit R. Kasser (eds.), Papyrus Michigan 3520 und 6868(a). Ecclesiastes, Erster Johannesbrief und Zweiter Petrusbrief im fayumischen Dialekt (TU 151), Berlin/New York 2003. – Schmidt, K. M., Mahnung und Erinnerung im Maskenspiel. Epistolographie, Rhetorik und Narrativik der pseudepigraphen Petrusbriefe (HBS 38), Freiburg et al. 2003. – Schmidt, K. M., Die Stimme des Apostels erheben. Pragmatische Leistungen der Autorenfiktion in den Petrusbriefen, in: Frey, J./Herzer, J./Janssen, M., unter Mitarbeit von Engelmann, M. (eds.), Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in frühchristlichen Briefen (WUNT 246), Tübingen 2009, 625–644. – Schmidt, K. M., Zweierlei Garderobe für Petrus. Das Petrusbild in den kanonischen Petrusbriefen, in: BiKi 67 (2012), 227–229. – Schrage, W., “Ein Tag ist beim Herrn wie tausend Jahre, und tausend Jahre sind wie ein Tag” (2 Petr 3,8), in: Gräßer, E./Merk, O. (eds.), Glaube und Eschatologie. FS Werner Kümmel, Tübingen 1985, 267– 275. – Siqueira, T. M., “Novos céus e nova terra, onde habitará a justice” (2Pd 3,13). A parusia do Filho do Homem, in: Estudos bíblicos (2000), 75–80. – Smith, T. V., Petrine Controversies in Early Christianity. Attitudes Towards Peter in Christian Writings of the First Two Centuries (WUNT II/15), Tübingen 1985. – Sonnleitner, K., Die Eschatologie des 2. Petrusbriefes, Dissertation Universität Wien 2008, online: http://othes.univie.ac.at/4479/ [11. 03. 2012]. – Starr, J. M., Sharers in Divine Nature. 2 Peter 1:4 in Its Hellenistic Context (CB.NT 33), Stockholm 2000. – Sylva, D. D., A Unified Field Picture of Second Peter 1.3–15. Making Rhetorical Sense out of Individual Images, in: Webb, R. L./Watson, D. F. (eds.), Reading Second Peter with New Eyes. Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Second Peter (LNTS 382), London/New York 2010, 91–118. – Thiede, C. P., A Pagan Reader of 2 Peter. Cosmic Conflagration in 2 Peter 3 and the “Octavius” of Minucius, in: JSNT (1986), 79–96. – Thomas, C. M., Canon and Antitype. The Relationship Between the Acts of Peter and the New Testament, in: Stoops, R. F. Jr. (ed.), The Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles in Intertextual Perspectives (Semeia 80), Atlanta 1997, 185– 205. – Thurén, L., Style Never Goes out of Fashion. 2 Peter Re-Evaluated, in: Porter, S. E./Olbricht, T. H. (eds.), Rhetoric, Scripture and Theology. Essays from the 1994 Pretoria Conference (JSNT.S 131), Sheffield 1996, 329–347. – Trobisch, D., Die Endredaktion des Neuen Testaments. Eine Untersuchung zur Entstehung der christlichen Bibel (NTOA 31), Fribourg/Göttingen 1996. – Van Houwelingen, P. H. R, De tweede Trompet. De authenticiteit van de tweede brief van Petrus, Kampen 1988. – Van Houwelingen, P. H. R., The Authenticity of 2 Peter. Problems and Possible Solutions, in: EJT 19 (2010), 119–129. – Vögtle, A., Die Schriftwerdung der apostolischen Paradosis nach 2 Petr 1,12–15, in: id. (ed.), Offenbarungsgeschehen und Wirkungsgeschichte. Neutestamentliche Beiträge, Freiburg 1985, 297–304. – Vögtle, A., Christo-logie und Theo-logie im Zweiten Petrusbrief, in: Breytenbach, C./Paulsen, H.(eds.), Anfänge der Christologie. FS Ferdinand Hahn, Göttingen 1991, 383–398. – Vögtle, A., ‘Keine Prophetie der Schrift ist Sache eigenwilliger Auslegung’ (2Petr 1,20b), in: id. (ed.), Offenbarungsgeschehen und Wirkungsgeschichte. Neutestamentliche Beiträge, Freiburg 1985, 305–328. – Vögtle, A., Petrus und Paulus nach dem Zweiten 6 Petrusbrief, in: id. (ed.) Offenbarungsgeschehen und Wirkungsgeschichte. Neutestamentliche Beiträge, Freiburg 1985, 280–294. – Wall, R. W., The Canonical Function of 2 Peter in: Bibl.Interpr. 9 (2001), 64–81. – Watson, D. F., Comparing Two Related Methods: Rhetorical Criticism and Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation Applied to Second Peter, in: Webb, R. L./id. (eds.), Reading Second Peter with New Eyes. Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Second Peter (LNTS 382), London/New York 2010, 27–57. – Webb, R. L. /Watson, D. F. (eds.), Reading Second Peter with New Eyes. Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Second Peter (LNTS 382), London/New York 2010. – Wehr, L., Petrus und Paulus – Kontrahenten und Partner. Die beiden Apostel im Spiegel des Neuen Testaments, der Apostolischen Väter und früher Zeugnisse ihrer Verehrung (NTA.NF 30), Münster 1996. – Wenham, D., Being “Found” on the Last Day. New Light on 2 Peter 3.10 and 2 Corinthians 5.3, in: NTS 33 (1987), 477–479. – Wiese, W., Em defesa da esperança. Uma análise exegética de 2 Pedro 3.1–13. 2. Parte, in: Vox scripturae 9 (1999), 11–23. – Wolters, A., “Partners of the Deity”. A Covenantal Reading of 2 Peter 1:4, in: CTJ 25 (1990), 28–44. – Wolters, A., Worldview and Textual Criticism in 2 Peter 3:10, in: Westminster Theological Journal 49 (1987), 405–413. Thematic Studies (Jude and 2 Peter): Bauckham, R. J., James, 1 and 2 Peter, Jude, in: Carson, D. A./Williamson, H. G. M. (eds.), It is Written. Scripture Citing Scripture. FS Barnabas Lindars, Cambridge 1992, 303–317. – Bauckham, R. J., James, 1 Peter, Jude and 2 Peter, in: Bockmuehl, M./Thompson, M. B. (eds.), A Vision for the Church. Studies in Early Christian Ecclesiology. FS John P.M. Sweet, Edinburgh 1997, 153–166. – Costantini, M./Gasperoni, A. (eds.), Guido Berardi. Le lettere del Nuovo Testamento II. Lettere non Paoline, Città del Vaticano 1987. – Charles, J. D., The Angels under Reserve in 2 Peter and Jude, in: BBR 15 (2005), 39–48. – Chatelion Counet, P., Pseudepigraphy and the Petrine School. Spirit and Tradition in 1 and 2 Peter and Jude, HTS 62 (2006), 403–424. – Chester, A. /Martin, R. P., The Theology of the Letters of James, Peter, and Jude (NTTh), Cambridge 1994. – Cothenet, É., La tradition selon Jude et 2 Pierre, in: NTS 35 (1989), 407–420 (reprinted in id. [ed.], Exégèse et liturgie II [LeDiv 175], Paris 1999, 239–254). – Countryman, L.W., Asceticism or Household Morality? 1 and 2 Peter and Jude, in: Vaage, L. E./Wimbush, V. L. (eds.), Asceticism and the New Testament, New York /London 1999, 371–382. – Davids, P. H., The Use of Second Temple Traditions in 1 and 2 Peter and Jude, in: Schlosser, J. (ed.), The Catholic Epistles and the Tradition (BEThL 176), Leuven 2004, 409–431. – Desjardins, M., The Portrayal of the Dissidents in 2 Peter and Jude. Does It Tell Us More About the ‘Godly’ than ‘Ungodly’ ?, in: JSNT 30 (1987), 89–102. – Dunnett, W. M., The Hermeneutics of Jude and 2 Peter. The Use of Ancient Jewish Tradition, in: JETS 31 (1988) 287–292. – Fabris, R., Elementi apocalittici nelle lettere di Pietro e Giuda, in: RStB 7 (1995), 85–102. – Feuillet, A., Le péché évoqué aux chapitres 3 et 6,1-4 de la Genèse. Le péché des anges de l'Epître de Jude et de la seconde Epître de Pierre, in: Divinitas 35 (1991), 207–229. – Frenschkowski, M., Erkannte Pseudepigraphie? Ein Essay über Fiktionalität, Antike und Christentum, in: Frey, J. et al. (eds.), Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in frühchristlichen Briefen (WUNT 246), Tübingen 2009, 181–232. – Frey, J., Autorfiktion und Gegnerbild im Judasbrief und im Zweiten Petrusbrief, in: id. et al. (eds.), Pseudepigraphie und Verfasserfiktion in frühchristlichen Briefen (WUNT 246), Tübingen 2009, 683–732. – Frey, J., Judgment on the Ungodly and the Parousia of Christ. Eschatology in Jude and 2 Peter, in: van der Watt, J. G. (ed.), Eschatology of the New Testament and Some Related Documents (WUNT II/315), Tübingen 2011, 493–513. – Frisius, M. A., Tertullian’s Use of the Pastoral Epistles, Hebrews, James, 1 and 2 Peter, and Jude (SBL 143), New York et al. 2011. – Gerdmar, A., Rethinking the Judaism-Hellenism Dichotomy. A Historiographical Case Study of Second Peter and Jude (CB.NT 36), Stockholm 2001. – Grünstäudl, W./Nicklas, T., Searching for Evidence. The History of Reception of the Second Letter of Peter and the Letter of Jude, in: Troy, M. W./Mason, E. F. (eds.), Reading 1-2 Peter and Jude. A Resource for Students (Resources for Biblical Study), Atlanta/Leiden (forthcoming 2013). – Kahmann, J./Judge, P. J., The Second Letter of Peter and the Letter of Jude. Their Mutual Relationship, in: Sevrin, J.-M. (ed.), The New Testament in Early Christianity. La réception des écrits néotestamentaires dans le christianisme primitif (BEThL 86), Leuven 1989, 105–121. – Martin, R. P., The Theology of Jude, 1 Peter, and 2 Peter, in: Chester, A./id. (eds.), The Theology of the Letters of James, Peter, and Jude (NTTh), 7 Cambridge 1994, 63–163. – Mathews, M. D., The Literary Relationship of 2 Peter and Jude. Does the Synoptic Tradition Resolve this Synoptic Problem?, in: Neotest. 44 (2010), 47–66. – Michaels, J. R., Finding Yourself an Intercessor. New Testament Prayer from Hebrews to Jude, in: Longenecker, R. N. (ed.), Into God’s Presence. Prayer in the New Testament (MMNTS), Grand Rapids 2001, 228–251. – Nicklas, T./Wasserman, T., Theologische Linien im Codex Bodmer Miscellani?, in: Nicklas, T./Kraus, T. J. (eds.), New Testament Manuscripts. Their Texts and Their World (TENT 2), Leiden/Boston 2006, 161–188. – Nienhuis, D., Not by Paul Alone. The Formation of the Catholic Epistle Collection and the Christian Canon, Waco 2007. – Siker, J. S., The Canonical Status of the Catholic Epistles in the Syriac New Testament, in: JTS.NS 38 (1987), 311–340. – Thurén, L., The Relationship between 2 Peter and Jude. A Classical Problem Resolved?, in: Schlosser, J. (ed.), The Catholic Epistles and the Tradition (BEThL 176), Leuven 2004, 451–460. – Viljoen, F. P., Faithful Christian Living Amidst Scoffers of the Judgment Day. Ethics and Ethos in Jude and 2 Peter, in: van der Watt, J. G. (ed.), Identity, Ethics, and Ethos in the New Testament (BZNW 141), Berlin/New York 2006, 511–533. – Wall, R., Toward a Unifying Theology of the Catholic Epistles. A Canonical Approach, in: Schlosser, J. (ed.), The Catholic Epistles and the Tradition (BEThL 176), Löwen 2004, 43–71. – Wasserman, T., Papyrus 72 and the Bodmer Miscellaneous Codex, in: NTS 51 (2005), 137– 154. – Watson, D. F., Invention, Arrangement, and Style. Rhetorical Criticism of Jude and 2 Peter (SBL.DS 104), Atlanta, Scholars Press, 1988. – Watson, D. F., The Oral-Scribal and Cultural Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in Jude and 2 Peter, in: Watson, D. F. (ed.), The Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in the New Testament (SBL.SyS 14), Atlanta 2002, 187– 213. 8