Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2012
…
2 pages
1 file
Abstract Developmental robotics (also known as epigenetic robotics) is mainly concerned with modeling the postnatal development of cognitive behaviors in living systems, such as language, emotion, curiosity, anticipation, and social skills. While current work in this field has shown significant successes, we believe integrating research on developmental (including epigenetic and morphogenetic) robotics and evolutionary robotics is the natural next step.
We survey developments in artificial neural networks, in behavior-based robotics, and in evolutionary algorithms that set the stage for evolutionary robotics (ER) in the 1990s. We examine the motivations for using ER as a scientific tool for studying minimal models of cognition, with the advantage of being capable of generating integrated sensorimotor systems with minimal (or controllable) prejudices. These systems must act as a whole in close coupling with their environments, which is an essential aspect of real cognition that is often either bypassed or modeled poorly in other disciplines. We demonstrate with three example studies: homeostasis under visual inversion, the origins of learning, and the ontogenetic acquisition of entrainment.
We propose ongoing emergence as a core concept in epigenetic robotics. Ongoing emergence refers to the continuous development and integration of new skills and is exhibited when six criteria are satisfied: (1) continuous skill acquisition, (2) incorporation of new skills with existing skills, (3) autonomous development of values and goals, (4) bootstrapping of initial skills, (5) stability of skills, and (6) reproducibility. In this paper we: (a) provide a conceptual synthesis of ongoing emergence based on previous theorizing, (b) review current research in epigenetic robotics in light of ongoing emergence, (c) provide prototypical examples of ongoing emergence from infant development, and (d) outline computational issues relevant to creating robots exhibiting ongoing emergence.
Connection Science, 2003
Developmental robotics is an emerging field located at the intersection of robotics, cognitive science and developmental sciences. This paper elucidates the main reasons and key motivations behind the convergence of fields with seemingly disparate interests, and shows why developmental robotics might prove to be beneficial for all fields involved. The methodology advocated is synthetic and two-pronged: on the one hand, it employs robots to instantiate models originating from developmental sciences; on the other hand, it aims to develop better robotic systems by exploiting insights gained from studies on ontogenetic development. This paper gives a survey of the relevant research issues and points to some future research directions.
In this short presentation we wish to formulate a definition of social embodiment grounded on an analysis of the relations between emotions, social interaction and development. Our hope is that this theoretical definition can be "tested" by social robotics, conceived in a "synthetic" (Pfeifer et al., 2008) or "constructivist" (Nehaniv and Dautenhahn 2007) way -in short: building robotic models to comprehend human cognition.
2007
Abstract Developmental Robotics provides a promising avenue for uncovering, exploring, testing, and validating hypothesis about the computational nature of intelligence. In this document, I define developmental robotics, and make a case for it as a promising avenue for research. I then discuss two areas of intelligent action that are amenable developmental robotics techniques: integrating information across modalities, and gathering the specific information that will help an developing robot achieve goals.
Künstliche Intell., 2021
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2017
Bloomsbury Semiotics, Vol. 3, 2023
This is the third of four volumes constituting The Bloomsbury Companion to Semiotics, a state-of-the-art survey of semiotic inquiry, proposing developments and research priorities, as though responding to Sebeok (1991: 97-9) when à propos semiosis and semiotics he asks, 'what lies in their future?'. The nature of the project is implementation of the 'detotalizing method', thus denominated by Rossi-Landi (1985). Uniting different disciplines, universes of discourse, a multiplicity of voices in an open dialogical totality, the detotalizing method presupposes alterity of signs, language and communication beyond the separatism of specialisms and universalisms, and as such is a dialectical-dialogical method. A global survey, diachronic and synchronic, historical and transdisciplinary, this project also recalls Morris and his appeal for 'unity of semiotic' ([1938] 1971: 55-64); a detotalized unity corresponding to the detotalized and dialogic nature of its object of study in its manifold manifestations-signs and sign systems, semiosis. The aim is not to juxtapose multiple special semiotics syncretically, nor to propose a totalizing transversal language of unified science, nor for semiotics to prevail over different disciplines in the name of philosophical omniscience. Instead, a general and global semiotic vision can perform a detotalizing, critical function towards all claimed totalities, thereby fostering dialogue among specialized disciplines. In this sense semiotics is unique, not merely 'a science among sciences, but an organon or instrument of all the sciences' ([1938] 1971: 67-8). Based on listening to the other, the detotalizing method favours deconstruction of the larger totality, evidencing interrelationship among its constitutive totalities, alias alterities. Otherness and dialogism are intrinsic to the sign, condition of interconnectiveness and interdependency among signs, sign systems and dimensions of semiosis in which human experience is articulated, its sense, meaning and significance. Regarding the arts and social sciences, attention is on verbal and nonverbal semiosis, before and beyond the word. Contrary to reductionist oversimplification, meaning cannot be encapsulated in definitions, pseudo-scientific jargon and improbable typologies. Technical terminology of special languages aside, signifying ambiguity is irrepressible. Alterity, dialogicality and listening are structural to the life of signs and enable semiotic research beyond prescribed boundaries of academic disciplines with their commonplaces and stereotypes, beyond institutionalized listening. Such propensity characterizes literary speech genres, and indeed artistic discourse generally.
International Journal of Project Management
Contexts – The Systemic Design Journal
Education and information technologies, 2024
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry , 2024
Women, Men, and Gods in the Discourse of Imperial Founding, Rome through Early Byzantium, 2015
夏荊山藝術論衡 Journal of Xia Jing Shan’s Art, 2016
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 1996
2017 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)
Journal of Business Strategy, 2020
Analytical Chemistry, 2007
Anais do Encontro do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas
Santelli Editrice, Cosenza, 1989
2018
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 2020