Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
8 pages
1 file
The Islamic State (also known as IS, formerly known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria-ISIS—the Islamic State of al-Sham-ISIS, and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria-ISIS) has been fighting their way through Iraq and Syria, and more recently Libya steadily and quickly gaining ground. The United States government has been actively engaged against this ideological paramilitary group since August of 2014 in Iraq and September of 2014 in Syria. However, the group itself is no longer the biggest issue. It’s global reach and influence threatens every non-Muslim or non-radical, and there seems to be allegiance or support in every corner of the globe somewhere for this monstrosity.
The Future of ISIS: Regional and International Implications, 2018
The U.S. has a number of core interests in the Middle East, including preventing the rise of a regional hegemon, nuclear proliferation, and significant terrorist attacks on the homeland, as well as ensuring access to oil and the security of regional allies. These interests provide a backdrop for the most prominent regional threat to emerge in recent years: ISIS. The good news is that ISIS poses little threat to the most crucial U.S. regional interests, such as preventing the rise of a regional hegemon and the proliferation of nuclear weapons. The bad news is that ISIL still presents a significant threat to a number of other U.S. interests, such as the stability of regional allies and the prevention of terrorist attacks. Furthermore, the group’s unique structure makes it more difficult for the U.S. and its allies to defeat it, as ISIS is not simply a terrorist group. Rather, it is at once a state that has controlled and governed territory the size of Indiana, a transnational insurgency that seeks to spread chaos and overthrow numerous regimes across the region, and a revolutionary movement that works to reshape societies and spread an extreme ideology and apocalyptic vision. This chapter analyzes the threat ISIS poses to U.S. interests, as well as how to understand and defeat the group's three faces of state, insurgency, and revolutionary movement.
The Islamic State is quickly becoming one of the most organized, while still decentralized, and violent terrorist organizations with high ambitions and capability in the Middle East. In an official statement for the record to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), the Director of National Intelligence has proclaimed the Islamic State to be the foremost terrorist threat to the United States. Claiming masses of land under their control through force and brutal violence, and still seizing more, to establish their Caliphate of governorship, the Islamic State appeals to even non-radicals in their proclamation of a self-appointed Caliph to govern Muslims as a whole. This would be a separate government of Muslims that exceeds nationals and regional boundaries of state law led by a single man, the Caliph, who leads this terrorist organization. In such governorship of territories already under Caliphate control, the Islamic State has established basic necessities such as electricity, running water, school, hospitals and other critical services to the people of their controlled lands in at least some areas. Such areas receiving these services can only be assumed to be grateful for these programs. It is unknown if these programs existed before the Caliphate took control and were ceased in the interim until the Caliphate was well established, but the Caliphate good-naturedness in restoring any previous services, or even improving them, would be duly noted by the people of the land and place the Caliph in less distasteful regards, perhaps even in pleasant regards for some. Such tactics are a major step up from the forced influence of using major infrastructure such as water supply to force submission and acquiescence of just two years ago as the Islamic State (then mostly referred to as ISIS) was on a path of war to obtain as much land as quickly as possible to establish the Caliphate, which by custom is recognized and strengthened as well as respected based on the size of his territorial land control (the Caliphate). It appeared ISIS at the time had a higher goal of a central territory of control in the Middle East, vast yes, but location was the key, in which Muslims from all over could come to join their Caliphate and their cause—their war. Since 2004, numerous terrorist cells and organizations have pledged allegiance to the Islamic State across the globe, providing IS the opportunity to proclaim more “provinces” of their Caliphate, even to the extent of encroaching on al-Qaeda and Taliban territories.
Starting as a branch of Al Qaeda and transforming to a new phase of armed group, imposing a territory control and governance as a state and then proclaiming itself as a Caliphate in the prophetic Islamic Method, ISIS has clearly challenged the international law from different approaches. The aim of this article is to address the problem imposed by ISIS and combat it from an interdisciplinary approach, therefore it examines the international legal obligations of ISIS as well the legality of countermeasures by states against it in accordance with the United Nations charter (Use of force and Self-Defense), International Humanitarian law , International Human Rights law. On the other hand legal or military means are not the only solution, but rather complementary political, economic and sociological measures will be fruitful with the long struggle to combat ISIS ideology. ISIS is a hybrid non-state armed group and cannot be targeted except by hybrid means.
The Islamic State (IS), also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) or the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) with their brutal Sunni Muslim terror organization [42] swept into the global media spotlight [23] and to prominence in 2012-2014 during and after Syria's civil war with their leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi [42]. The international community has watched in shock as the group has terrorized en masse those that do not comply with its violent and extremist worldview. ISIS poses a direct threat to international safety and security, as they are the largest in land control and fighting size, and wealthiest terrorist organization in history. ISIS now controls more territory and resources than any terrorist organization that has ever existed [42]. A comparative approach allows us to map where IS has developed new techniques, as well as where it has mimicked or built off of previous jihadist tactics [22]. This paper analyzes International terrorism in the Middle East with critical view on ISIS as a case study and proposed coherent political solution.
The Islamic State (IS), also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) or the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) with their brutal Sunni Muslim terror organization [42] swept into the global media spotlight [23] and to prominence in 2012-2014 during and after Syria's civil war with their leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi [42]
African Journal of Law, Political Research and Administration, 2024
The origins of ISIS were traced to the Arab Spring that created instability in the Middle East. This instability was exacerbated by the American-led coalition's invasion of Iraq in 2003, prompted by the 9/11 attacks. The paper aims to have an overview of the origin and goals of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and the strategies employed by the U.S. and Allied Forces to make ISIS fall. A systematic literature review approach was adopted to review the selected literature. ISIS was formed out of various militant groups in the country whose goal is to establish an Islamic caliphate governed by strict Sharia law. The goal of ISIS was to establish an Islamic caliphate in Iraq, Syria, and beyond with a caliph as the leader of the territories, thereby eradicating state borders and governments they deemed to be illegitimate. This caliphate is to be governed by strict Sharia law. This analysis delves into the strategies used by the US-led coalition to reclaim territories from ISIS. These strategies include military strategies, economic strategies, political strategies, and social strategies. It was, therefore, recommended that to combat ISIS's ideology effectively, the United States may need to collaborate more with Muslim clerics all over the world to promote interpretations of the Quran that counter radicalization in Islam.
This paper was written in response to Graeme Wood's article about ISIS in the March 2015 issue of the Atlantic.
2015
A year ago the world witnessed the swift advances of the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) in Iraq and Syria. Though the emergence of the group was somewhat expected for those who have been following the regional developments of the past years it caught most of the world by surprise. At the same time, its brutal tactics, military victories, resilience, evolution and extreme ideology have led many to characterize it as the greatest regional and international security threat at the moment or the most dangerous Islamist threat contemporary history has seen.
In Focus, 2014
The sudden emergence of Islamic State (previously Islamic State of Iraq and al Shaam) has changed the politics that governs the interaction among terrorist groups. Although fighting for the same goals as al Qaeda, there are some differences between the two, and this article evaluates these differences.
2016
Europe and Hungary, currently faces multiple national threats in an environment of growing disorder. ISIS, the “State of Terror”, is executing a sophisticated strategy that involves simultaneous efforts and attacks in Iraq and Syria, the Middle East and North Africa, and the wider world. Civil wars are intensifying in Ukraine, Yemen, and Libya, causing massive migration waves. The recent terrorist attack in Paris has shown that ISIS supported homegrown terrorism is an increasing threat. This article discusses the development and internal issues of the most dangerous terrorist organization. Although it was not a purpose to analyze the international consequences of the recent ISIS attack in Paris, the authors express their hope that ISIS might make a strategic mistake. On 13 November, 2015 can be a turning point in the fight against the Islamic State.
El Universal, 2024
The General Science Journal, 2020
Girlhood Studies, 2017
Cancer Treatment Reviews, 2008
Neurological Research, 2009
Journal of Computer Science Technology, 2005
Estudios Atacameños, 2019