Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Is Breathing Safe?

This Wallethub note looks at the pros and cons of vaping; click on the URL.

Is breathing safe? Peter R. Killeen Department of Psychology Arizona State University My city has had an ozone alert for the last week, generating excess asthma and pneumonia cases and contributing to lung cancer. Four cities in southern California are worse. In China, in excess of 360,000 premature deaths are attributed to air pollution in 2013. Life is dangerous; the alternative unattractive. Alternatives matter. So when we ask whether vaping is safe, the immediate question must be, compared to what? Compared to knitting in Kaibab? Probably not. Compared to jogging in Beijing or LA? Probably yes. Compared to smoking in Sheboygan? Absolutely! “First, do no harm” is a bioethics of the medical profession, attributed to the Hippocratic Oath (although not appearing there). The origin is in another source, which enjoins physicians to “To do good, or to do no harm”. These similar sounding homilies engender radically different approaches to public health. First, do no harm enjoins us to disapprove any activity that might have a negative effect on the individual. Such indulgences include oral tobacco, marijuana, heroin, and, yes, vaping. To do good, or to do no harm enjoins us to improve the health or life quality of the individual. This is called a harm reduction agenda. Adherents to it genuflect in a very different church that that of their brethren. They do not impose what they think is best for their clients; instead they urge policies that will improve their longevity and quality of life. Thus, we hear that oral tobacco causes mouth cancer. This is true. What we do not hear is that it causes it at a much lower rate than do cigarettes, and does not carry the additional burden of lung cancer emphysema and other concomitants of smoking. The absolutist message here prevailed: If you had to choose between them you would be much better off with chew than with cigs; but most folks don’t know that. The same message holds for vaping. For 30 years physicians and scientists have assured patients attempting to quit that NRT—Nicotine Replacement Therapy—was safe and non-addictive. This included nicotine inhalers, along with the patch and lozenges. I believe them. Addictive? A recent analysis of over 25000 individuals by scientists working at Pinney Associates estimated that the use of nicotine gum among adult never-smokers is 0 %. Among ex-smokers, that figure is 5 to 10%, and it was associated with a lower probability of cigarette use. Indeed, the problem is just that—vaping cannot replace tobacco, despite its healthier profile, because it is missing some critical ingredients. Those include monoamine oxidizers inhibitors, which ravage the brain in such a way that makes nicotine a perfect short-term fix. Of course, it also lacks all of the known carcinogens in tobacco. So, is it safe? Merchandisers are adding stuff to e-cig oils that may be harmful if combusted and inhaled—just like the 600 additives approved for use in real cigarettes may be harmful if inhaled. We do not know if those are safe; we know that some can irritate the throat and lungs. So if you, a tobacco-virgin, are considering e-cigs because they are hip or because they stimulate thinking, try a new wardrobe or caffeine instead. If you, a cigarette addict, are considering e-cigs, know that replacing half your cigarettes by e-cigs will cut your risks in half. Safer for sure. .