ISSN:2157-7595
Journal of Yoga & Physical Therapy
The International Open Access
Journal of Yoga & Physical Therapy
Editor-in-Chief
H Clare Lewis
California State University, USA
Executive Editors
Xiaofen D Keating
The University of Texas at Austin, USA
Elaine Louise Bukowski
The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, USA
Andreas Michalsen
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
Kuei-Min Chen
Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan
Available online at: OMICS Publishing Group (www.omicsonline.org)
T
his article was originally published in a journal published by
OMICS Publishing Group, and the attached copy is provided
by OMICS Publishing Group for the author’s beneit and for the
beneit of the author’s institution, for commercial/research/
educational use including without limitation use in instruction at
your institution, sending it to speciic colleagues that you know,
and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator.
All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without
limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access,
or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s
website or repository, are requested to cite properly.
Digital Object Identiier: http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2157-7595.1000138
MacDonald, J Yoga Phys Ther 2013, 3:3
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2157-7595.1000138
Yoga & Physical Therapy
Research
Article
Review
Article
Open
OpenAccess
Access
A Call for the Inclusion of Spirituality in Yoga Research
Douglas A MacDonald*
Department of Psychology, University of Detroit Mercy, Michigan, USA
Abstract
In this brief article, the author draws attention to the fact that much of the current scientiic research on yoga has
tended to exclude spirituality as a focus of study. In response, he presents arguments and information regarding the
value of incorporating spiritual constructs in yoga investigations and makes suggestions for future studies.
A call for the inclusion of spirituality in yoga research
With its origins tracing back more than two millennia to ancient
India, yoga is a popular practice throughout the world in our time.
Accompanying this rise in popularity in the past few decades has been
a growing interest on the part of scientists and health professionals
alike to empirically explore the salubrious efects of yoga on health and
to apply it to the amelioration of physical and mental illness. In this
vein, available meta-analyses of the investigations done to date suggest
that yoga holds excellent potential for the treatment of pain [1,2] and
contributes to improved psychological health in a variety of clinical
populations including cancer patients [3-5], menopausal women [6],
and persons sufering from a range of neuropsychiatric conditions [7,8].
Notwithstanding its promise as a complementary health
intervention, one notable trend seen in the literature has been the
tendency for practitioners and researchers to deine and study yoga
without overt consideration and inclusion of its foundational spiritual
nature and goals [9-11]. he deinition of yoga ofered by this journal
is a salient example- as stated on the journal webpage, yoga is “the
practice of attaining physical and mental health through meditation
and physical exercise” (http://www.omicsonline.org/jypthome.php;
retrieved July 25, 2013). he same trend has been observed in how
meditation in general is deined in the current research [12]. hough
the exclusion of spirituality is somewhat understandable since it is a
construct that historically has been associated with religion which itself
has been viewed as falling outside the purview of scientiic inquiry
[13], such a trend in how yoga is operationalized and investigated may
be seen as unfortunate as a burgeoning body of theory and research
indicates that spirituality is not only an important component of human
functioning that has a substantive impact on health [14] but also that
its incorporation into meditative interventions results in improved
outcomes above and beyond what is seen with more secularized
meditation [15,16] . Given these indings, it would seem important and
even prudent for research on yoga to incorporate spirituality so as to
best ascertain how it may incrementally contribute to health and wellbeing. With this in mind, I would like to dedicate the remainder of this
short article to an overview of the status of spirituality as a scientiic
construct with emphasis given to my own research done over the past
two decades.
What is Spirituality?
As already noted, spirituality and related concepts such as religion/
religiousness have come to be the focus of increasing amounts of
research within the health and social sciences (e.g. medicine, nursing,
psychology, social work, counseling). As an ostensible manifestation
of the empirical work, signiicant eforts have been put forth to devise
scientiically useful deinitions and at present there are a wide array
of standardized assessment instruments available. For instance, in
J Yoga Phys Ther
ISSN: 2157-7595 JYPT, an open access journal
literature surveys I completed in the mid-to-late 1990s, my colleagues
and I uncovered over 100 measures of spirituality and related concepts
[17,18] and several more have appeared since then. However, despite
the ready availability of measurement tools, there exists considerable
controversy surrounding how to best conceptualize and measure
spirituality with the main issues revolving around (a) its relation to
religion (e.g., are spirituality and religion the same or diferent?), (b)
the utilization of metaphysical concepts and terms in its deinition
which cannot be rendered open to conventional modes of inquiry and
investigation (e.g., do we need such notions as divine, sacred, and God
in order to deine spirituality?), (c) its contamination with other health
constructs, particularly well-being, (d) whether it is best measured
quantitatively or qualitatively, and (e) its universality across cultures
[19-25]. Some scholars have been so frustrated with the persistence
and seeming intractability of these issues that they have suggested the
abandonment of spirituality as a topic of study [26].
I myself have spent the better part of the past 20 years working in
the area of spirituality with most of my eforts directed at measurement.
While I am very aware of the aforementioned issues (and have been
among the more vocal members of the scientiic community in
highlighting them), this has not discouraged me from advocating for
spirituality studies. Rather, these problems have served to motivate
me to adopt a thoughtful and methodical stance toward the science
and to profer approaches to research which show sensitivity to the
complexities of studying spirituality. Considering the vast number of
available instruments and the lack of apparent consensus regarding
how to best conceptualize the construct, my eforts have been most
centrally directed identifying and operationalizing robust core
features of spirituality as they are embodied in existing tests so as to
bring some degree of order to what the empirical literature is actually
telling us about spirituality. hese eforts resulted in the development
of a multidimensional measurement model based upon the conjoint
statistical analysis of a wide sampling of extant measures [21]. he
dimensions themselves appear to embody broad domains of spirituality
which have found expression in the scientiic, philosophical, and spiritual
literature. Succinctly stated, the dimensions are Cognitive Orientation
toward Spirituality (i.e., beliefs about the existence and importance
*Corresponding author: Douglas A MacDonald, Department of Psychology,
University of Detroit Mercy, 4001 West Mc Nichols Road, Detroit, Michigan, USA,
48221-3038; Tel: (313) 578-0388; E-mail:
[email protected]
Received July 30, 2013; Accepted August 26, 2013; Published August 29, 2013
Citation: MacDonald DA (2013) A Call for the Inclusion of Spirituality in Yoga
Research. J Yoga Phys Ther 3: 138. doi:10.4172/2157-7595.1000138
Copyright: © 2013 MacDonald DA. This is an open-access article distributed under
the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and
source are credited.
Volume 3 • Issue 3 • 1000138
Citation: MacDonald DA (2013) A Call for the Inclusion of Spirituality in Yoga Research. J Yoga Phys Ther 3: 138. doi:10.4172/2157-7595.1000138
Page 2 of 3
of spirituality to one’s daily living), Experiential/Phenomenological
Dimension (i.e., non-ordinary experiences and states of consciousness
of a spiritual nature which involve some alteration to one’s sense of
self), Existential Well-Being (i.e., a perception of self as having meaning
and purpose and the capacity to deal with the existential adversities of
life), Paranormal Beliefs (i.e., beliefs in the validity of parapsychological
phenomena), and Religiousness (i.e., beliefs in the existence of a higher
power and involvement in practices and activities typically associated
with devout religious life such as meditation and prayer).
To make these dimensions accessible for investigation, I
concurrently created a paper-and-pencil self-report measure called the
Expressions of Spirituality Inventory (ESI) [21,27] which demonstrates
good psychometric properties. To date, the ESI has proven valuable
in not only bringing order to the empirical literature [24], but also
for validation of other instruments [28,29], empirical examination of
the relation of spirituality to personality and psychosocial functioning
[21,30-35] and for theory development [36] (also see end note 1). In
general, the work done with the ESI strongly suggests that spirituality
(a) is a unique domain of human functioning and individual diference
that is not reducible to other recognized aspects of functioning (e.g.,
health, personality) though is related to them, and (b) demonstrates
complex and multidirectional relationships to health and pathology
across the dimensions with Existential Well-Being, Religiousness,
and Cognitive Orientation toward Spirituality showing the most
consistently positive associations, the Experiential/Phenomenological
Dimension showing mixed relations, and Paranormal Beliefs the most
consistent linkages to psychopathology.
What does this mean for yoga research? Some
recommendations
In a paper I co-authored for the International Journal of Yoga [37],
I presented information on a variety of instruments which appear to
hold promise for yoga research. he ESI is included among these tests
and would be good to use if one wants to measure general dimensions
of spirituality. However, in many instances, an investigator is in need of
tools that assess more specialized and theory-driven spiritual concepts.
In the case of yoga with its grounding in Hindu philosophy, research
employing measures of explicitly Hindu concepts would seem to be
prime candidates for consideration. As such, tests such as the Hindu
Religious Coping Scale [38], Measures of Hindu Pathways [39] and the
Vedic Personality Inventory [40,41] may prove valuable.
Regardless of the type of measure used, the incorporation of spiritual
variables in yoga research would help to broaden the informativeness of
such investigations by fostering greater understanding of the reciprocal
inluence they have on each other. hat is, whether studying yoga
practice as part of lifestyle or as a treatment, such studies would permit
for greater insight as to how spirituality may contribute to selection
(e.g., do people’s spirituality inluence whether or not they choose to
practice yoga and/or show receptiveness to engaging in yoga-based
interventions?), outcomes (e.g., does involvement in yoga enhance
spirituality in practitioners and vice versa?), and change mechanisms
(e.g., does spirituality serve as a mechanism to facilitate therapeutic
and/or personological change?). Based upon my own past and ongoing
research, some of which is cited earlier, here are three concrete examples
of the kind of empirical studies that I am encouraging-(a) explore
whether one or more major aspects of spirituality mediate the relation
between yogic practice and physical and health outcomes in samples
of people participating in yoga-based interventions. Particularly
promising dimensions of my ESI for use in such investigations include
J Yoga Phys Ther
ISSN: 2157-7595 JYPT, an open access journal
Cognitive Orientation toward Spirituality, Religiousness, and the
Experiential/Phenomenological Dimension; (b) examine the extent
to which spiritual variables moderate the relation of yoga to treatment
outcomes through the examination of the interaction efects of one
or more ESI dimensions with yoga practice, and; (c) compare preversus post-treatment levels of spirituality in both clinical and nonclinical samples of yoga practitioners to ascertain if there are changes
in spirituality as a function of yoga practice. A more speciic study
idea along these lines would be to compare secular versus spirituallycontextualized yoga practice on both health and spiritual outcomes. It
is my hope that such research will be energetically pursued by those in
the yoga community
Endnote
At the time of writing this article, I am involved with additional
investigations examining the generalizability of the ESI across cultures
and languages. Preliminary analyses indicate that the instrument
shows good structural invariance but that culture needs to be taken
into account when studying spirituality. I am also in the early stages
of exploring the relation of spirituality assessed via the ESI to resting
brain states measured using quantitative EEG. I am expecting to have
manuscripts reporting the results of these studies completed in the near
future and am hopeful that they ind publication.
Author Biographical Statement
Douglas A. MacDonald, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of
Psychology at the University of Detroit Mercy. He has been actively
involved in research on spirituality for several years with primary
emphasis given to its measurement and explorations of its relations
and implications for psychological and social functioning. He is
Editor Emeritus of the International Journal of Transpersonal Studies,
Associate Editor of the Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, and
Research Editor of the Journal of Humanistic Psychology. As well,
he is on the editorial board for the Journal of Management, Religion,
and Spirituality, and the Australian Gestalt Journal and serves as an ad
hoc reviewer for a variety of other journals specializing in research on
religion, spirituality, humanistic and existential psychology, personality
psychology, and psychometrics.
References
1. Büssing A, Ostermann T, Lüdtke R, Michalsen A (2012) Effects of yoga
interventions on pain and pain-associated disability: a meta-analysis. J Pain
13: 1-9.
2. Cramer H, Lauche R, Haller H, Dobos G (2013) A systematic review and metaanalysis of yoga for low back pain. Clin J Pain 29: 450-460.
3. Buffart LM, van Uffelen JG, Riphagen II, Brug J, van Mechelen W, et al. (2012)
Physical and psychosocial beneits of yoga in cancer patients and survivors:
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC
Cancer 12: 599.
4. Cramer H, Lange S, Klose P, Paul A, Dobos G (2012) Yoga for breast cancer
patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer
12: 412.
5. Lin KY, Hu YT, Chang KJ, Lin HF, Tsauo JY (2011) Effects of yoga on
psychological health, quality of life, and physical health of patients with
cancer: A meta-analysis. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative
Medicine659876.
6. Cramer H, Lauche R, Langhorst J, Dobos G (2012) Effectiveness of yoga for
menopausal symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized
controlled trials. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
863905.
7. Balasubramaniam M, Telles S, Doraiswamy PM (2013) Yoga on our minds:
Volume 3 • Issue 3 • 1000138
Citation: MacDonald DA (2013) A Call for the Inclusion of Spirituality in Yoga Research. J Yoga Phys Ther 3: 138. doi:10.4172/2157-7595.1000138
Page 3 of 3
a systematic review of yoga for neuropsychiatric disorders. Frontiers in
Psychiatry3:117.
8. Cramer H, Lauche R, Klose P, Langhorst J, Dobos G (2013) Yoga
forschizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 13:
32.
9. Feuerstein G (1989) Yoga: The technology of ecstasy. Los Angeles, CA:
Jeremy Tarcher, USA.
10. Taimni IK (1961) The science of yoga. The yoga-sutras of Patanjali in Sanskrit
with transliteration in Roman, translation in English and commentary. Wheaton,
IL, USA: Theosophical Publishing House.
11. Vishnudevananda S (1960) The complete illustrated book of yoga. New York:
Julian Press, USA.
12. MacDonald DA, Walsh R, Shapiro SL (2013) Meditation: Empirical research
and future directions. In: Friedman HL, Hartelius G (Eds). Wiley-Blackwell
Handbook of Transpersonal Psychology. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, USA,
433-458.
13. Jones SL (1994) A constructive relationship for religion with the science
and profession of psychology: Perhaps the boldest model yet.American
Psychologist 49:184-199.
14. Lucchetti G, Lucchetti AL, Koenig HG (2011) Impact of spirituality/religiosity on
mortality: Comparison with other health interventions. Explore (NY) 7: 234-238.
15. Cole BS, HopkinsCM, Spiegel J, Tisak J, Agarwala S, et al. (2012) A randomised
clinical trial of the effects of spiritually focused meditation for people with
metastatic melanoma. Mental Health, Religion & Culture 15: 161-174.
16. Wachholtz AB,Pargament KI (2008) Migraines and meditation: Does spirituality
matter? Journal of Behavioral Medicine 31: 351-366.
17. MacDonald DA, LeClair L, Holland CJ, Alter A, Friedman HL (1995) A survey
of measures of transpersonal constructs. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology
27: 171-235.
18. MacDonald DA, Kuentzel JG, Friedman HL (1999) A survey of measures of
spiritual and transpersonal constructs: Part two- Additional instruments. Journal
of Transpersonal Psychology 31: 155-177.
19. Helminiak DA (2008) Confounding the divine and the spiritual: Challenges to a
psychology of spirituality. Pastoral Psychology 57: 161-182.
20. Helminiak DA, Hoffman L,Dodson E (2012) A Critique of the “Theistic
Psychology” Movement as Exempliied in Bartz’s (2009) “Theistic Existential
Psychotherapy”. The Humanistic Psychologist 40: 179-196.
24. MacDonald DA, Friedman HL (2002) Assessment of humanistic, transpersonal,
and spiritual constructs: State of the Science. Journal of Humanistic Psychology
42: 102-125.
25. Migdal L, MacDonald DA (2013) Clarifying the relation between spirituality and
well-being. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease201: 274-280.
26. Koenig HG (2008) Concerns about measuring “spirituality” in research. Journal
of Nervous and Mental Disease 196: 349-355.
27. MacDonald DA (2000)The Expressions of Spirituality Inventory: Test
development, validation, and scoring information. Unpublished test manual.
28. Kassab V, MacDonald DA (2011) Examination of the psychometric properties of
the Spiritual Fitness Assessment. Journal of Religion and Health 50: 975-985.
29. MacDonald DA, Holland D (2002) Examination of the psychometric properties
of the Temperament and Character Inventory Self-Transcendence dimension.
Personality and Individual Differences 32: 1013-1027.
30. Affeldt DL, MacDonald DA (2010) The relationship of spirituality to work and
organizational attitudes and behaviors in a sample of employees from a health
care system. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology 42: 192-208.
31. Huber JT, MacDonaldDA (2012) An investigation of the relation between
altruism, empathy, and spirituality. Journal of Humanistic Psychology52: 206221.
32. MacDonald DA, Holland D (2002) Spirituality and boredom proneness.
Personality and Individual Differences 32: 1113-1119.
33. MacDonald DA, Holland D (2002) Spirituality and self-reported complex-partial
epileptic-like signs. Psychological Reports 91: 785-792.
34. MacDonald DA, Holland D(2003) Spirituality and the MMPI-2. Journal of
Clinical Psychology 59: 399-410.
35. Mendez DM, MacDonald DA (2012) Spirituality and the MMPI-2 Restructured
Clinical Scales. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies 31: 1-10.
36. MacDonald DA (2009) Identity and Spirituality: Conventional and transpersonal
perspectives. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies 28: 86-106.
37. MacDonald DA, Friedman HL (2009) Measures of spiritual and transpersonal
constructs for use in yoga research. International Journal of Yoga2: 2-12.
38. Tarakeshwar N, Pargament KI, Mahoney A (2003) Initial development
of a measure of religious coping among Hindus. Journal of Community
Psychology31: 607-628.
21. MacDonald DA (2000) Spirituality: Description, measurement and relation to
the Five Factor Model of personality. Journal of Personality 68: 153-197.
39. Tarakeshwar N, Pargament KI, Mahoney A (2003) Measures of Hindu
pathways: Development and preliminary evidence of reliability and validity.
Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology 9: 316-332.
22. MacDonald DA (2011) Studying spirituality scientiically: Relections,
considerations, and recommendations. Journal of Management, Spirituality
and Religion 8: 195-210.
40. Wolf DB (1998) The Vedic Personality Inventory: A study of the Gunas. Journal
of Indian Psychology 16: 26-43.
23. MacDonald DA, FriedmanHL (2001) The scientiic study of spirituality:
Philosophical and methodological considerations. Biofeedback Newsmagazine
29: 19-21.
41. Wolf DB (1999) A psychometric analysis of the three gunas. Psychological
Reports, 84: 1379-1390.
Submit your next manuscript and get advantages of OMICS
Group submissions
Unique features:
•
•
•
User friendly/feasible website-translation of your paper to 50 world’s leading languages
Audio Version of published paper
Digital articles to share and explore
Special features:
Citation: MacDonald DA (2013) A Call for the Inclusion of Spirituality in Yoga
Research. J Yoga Phys Ther 3: 138. doi:10.4172/2157-7595.1000138
J Yoga Phys Ther
ISSN: 2157-7595 JYPT, an open access journal
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
250 Open Access Journals
20,000 editorial team
21 days rapid review process
Quality and quick editorial, review and publication processing
Indexing at PubMed (partial), Scopus, EBSCO, Index Copernicus and Google Scholar etc
Sharing Option: Social Networking Enabled
Authors, Reviewers and Editors rewarded with online Scientiic Credits
Better discount for your subsequent articles
Submit your manuscript at: http://www.omicsonline.org/submission
Volume 3 • Issue 3 • 1000138