Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
10 pages
1 file
Course Description This seminar will study various forms of and theories about ever-growing inequalities both within and between countries, and their implications for human rights law, policy and advocacy. Existing inequalities powerfully determine who is in a position to avoid harm and even reap profits from human rights violations. In addition to examining the nature and extent of existing inequalities, this seminar will consider whether and how human rights approaches might adequately respond to those inequalities, exacerbate them, or both. The seminar will be organized around the visits of leading scholars and practitioners in the fields of inequality and human rights who will come to the Law School to present their research. Students will spend two weeks considering work by each speaker. In the first week, we will meet in a traditional seminar format to discuss the speaker's work. In the second week, the speakers will present their work in a public forum, and will engage in dialogue with seminar students, as well as with others in the university community who choose to attend the talk. Students will thus have the opportunity both to participate in critical discussion of the work in a small setting and to observe and contribute to a conversation with the authors in a broader audience. Students are expected to participate actively in class discussions, write short critical papers in response to the readings for the seminar, and write a longer essay on a topic related to the themes that arise during the semester. The seminar is open to law students as well as to non-law graduate and professional students with relevant background.
This bibliography has been prepared by the Rapoport Center for Human Rights and Justice at the University of Texas School of Law as part of a larger project on the relationship between human rights and economic inequality. It aims to identify resources of value for scholars and legal practitioners thinking about the relationship between human rights and economic inequality. As such it includes primary and secondary texts that speak to the intersection of human rights and economic inequality, which often conceptualize the relationship between them in diverse ways. This bibliography also includes texts relevant to thinking about economic inequality historically and in contemporary society. Finally, this bibliography includes human rights literature and resources addressing themes such as poverty and development, which although they may not pertain directly to problems of economic inequality, could nonetheless be of value and assistance in thinking more deeply about the relationship between human rights and economic inequality
Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, 2019
Background Socioeconomic inequality has been called "the defining challenge of our time," and "the root of all social evil." 1 Inequalities in income and wealth are growing, and quite clearly affect human rights. They powerfully determine who can avoid harm and reap profits from human rights violations as well as who will bear the cost of and suffer from ongoing harms. But might human rights also affect persistent inequalities? Might they provide useful tools for ameliorating economic inequality? Might they sometimes exacerbate it? These are some of the questions we posed to the interdisciplinary group of contributors to this dossier. 2 We acknowledged that international human rights law and discourse have long focused, at least in principle, on the promotion of what is often termed "status equality," by prohibiting discrimination on the basis of numerous attributes including race, nationality, religion, and sex. More recently, the prohibition has been extended to areas such as disability and sexuality. Notwithstanding the inclusion of property and birth in the Universal Declaration's list of prohibited bases of discrimination, some have argued that human rights law and discourse have largely remained inattentive to inequalities of wealth and income-within countries, among countries, and globally. 3 To the extent that economic issues have entered the human rights arena, the argument goes, they primarily have done so with the aim of poverty reduction, through the deployment of social and economic rights, and the right to development. Moreover, by some accounts, these approaches not only remain on the margins of human rights but also are often embedded in prescriptions for development that focus on economic growth, and neglect the distributive consequences of that growth. To the extent that human rights concentrate only on achieving minimum standards for a dignified existence, they may well ignore the growing distance between the poor and the wealthy. A focus on economic inequality therefore calls for attention to more than poverty reduction or even elimination; it requires interrogating the neoclassical economic and neoliberal paradigms for producing growth. It demands consideration of the structural causes of the maldistribution of wealth, income, and access to resources, both within and among countries. If human rights law, movements, and discourses are to address economic inequality, they will need to attend to the distributional consequences of globalized markets. They will have to engage with international and national policy choices around issues such as natural resource governance, labor, social protection, sovereign and personal debt, austerity, and taxation. 4 Rather than offering a set of legal and other prescriptions for combatting inequality, might human rights even be part of the problem? 5 Some scholars have highlighted that the
Fulda International Autumn School, 2021
Our world is divided by deep social inequalities, aggravated by contemporary challenges such as economic crises, climate change, and a global pandemic. While the unprecedented wealth of our times is under control of a few, poverty and precarity affect more and more people. While a part of the world's population enjoys social and political rights, others face institutional discrimination or persecution. While some have the freedom to move or to stay at home, others are forced to seek refuge or stay in places where they are not considered as equals. During the Autumn School, we will explore how intersecting dimensions of global inequalities shape societies and people's everyday lives and discuss ways to confront them.
International Studies Quarterly, 2009
This article tests the empirical relationship between inequality and the protection of personal integrity rights using a cross-national time-series data set for 162 countries for the years 1980-2004. The data comprise measures of land inequality, income inequality, and a combined factor score for personal integrity rights protection, while the analysis controls for additional sets of explanatory variables related to development, political regimes, ethnic composition, and domestic conflict. The analysis shows robust support for the empirical relationship between income inequality and personal integrity rights abuse across the whole sample of countries as well as for distinct subsets, including non-communist countries and non-OECD countries. The hypothesized effect of land inequality is also born out by the data, although its effects are less substantial and less robust across different methods of estimation. Additional variables with explanatory weight include the level of income, democracy, ethnic fragmentation, domestic conflict, and population size. Sensitivity analysis suggests that the results are not due to reverse causation, misspecification or omitted variable bias. The analysis is discussed in the context of inequality and rights abuse in specific country cases and the policy implications of the results are considered in the conclusion.
This paper takes the view that human rights, and equality and diversity, come from different starting points, primarily in their respective relationships to the state power. Put simply, one might say that civil rights offer protection by the state, whereas human rights offer protection from the state.
2019
The human rights movement has done little to address economic inequality. So says Samuel Moyn in Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. Reviewer Katharine Young disagrees. The good work promoting equality has been done, but this time, it has been done outside the United States. Had Moyn originally looked to where Young is now pointing, his book would have been much improved.
This paper is not an attempt to evaluate global human rights in the context of its practice, achievements, and limitations. Neither is it an inquiry into the theoretical or philosophical foundation of human rights. There is a school of thought which, maintains that it is possible to promote a theory of justice founded on fairness and impartiality without invoking philosophical or metaphysical claims ‘to universal truth, or claims about the essential nature and identity of persons. (John Rawls 1985) I will discuss the historical context of the inception of the concept of human rights, its evolution over centuries, and its relationship with capitalism. I will also examine the status and the role of human rights in the changing global context of neoliberalism and recent institutional responses, particularly some of the main contradictions of contemporary societies and new paths that would lead to a more just and fraternal world.
This Article will explore the structural inequality between civil and political rights and economic, social and cultural rights. It will explore the asymmetry that stifles the radical origins and potential of international human rights laws, particularly with regard to access to civil society actors. With investigation into austerity measures and increasing poverty in the UK, this Article demonstrates examples of civil society actors countervailing institutional power. Participation and Practice in Rights (PPR) supports people who have had their human rights violated to can hold the Northern Irish and British government accountable to their international human rights obligations by using the international human rights mechanisms. 'We speak of people possessing " universal human rights " usually in those contexts where the people have, in fact, no rights and no way to assert rights.' 1 'There's really no such thing as the " voiceless ". There are only the deliberately silenced, or the preferably unheard.' 2
Review of International Studies, 2011
A concern with ensuring minimum standards of dignity for all and a doctrine based on the need to secure for everyone basic levels of rights have traditionally shaped the way in which international human rights law addresses poverty. Whether this minimalist, non-relational approach befits international law objectives in the area of world poverty begs consideration. This article offers three justifications as to why global material inequality – and not just poverty – should matter to international human rights law. The article then situates requirements regarding the improvement of living conditions, a system of equitable distribution in the case of hunger, and in particular obligations of international cooperation, within the post-1945 international effort at people-centred development. The contextual consideration of relevant tenets serves to demonstrate that positive international human rights law can be applied beyond efforts at poverty alleviation to accommodate a doctrine of fai...
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2022
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2013
Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2000
Passa Palavra, 2021
BAŞKENT UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2019
Canguilhem's Critique of Biological Thought and Historical Epistemology , 2020
lasa.international.pitt.edu
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2014
Sedimentary Geology, 2000
Dinámica espacial de la manufactura y procesos migratorios de la mano de obra en México, 2012
Journal of technology and science education, 2024
SPIE Proceedings, 2003
International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems, 2010
Mehanika giroskopičeskih sistem, 2014