Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
International Journal of English Studies, 2007
This paper surveys some current developments in second language vocabulary assessment, with particular attention to the ways in which computer corpora can provide better quality information about the frequency of words and how they are used in specific contexts. The relative merits of different word lists are discussed, including the Academic Word List and frequency lists derived from the British National Corpus. Word frequency data is needed for measures of vocabulary size, such as the Yes/No format, which is being developed and used for a variety of purposes. The paper also reviews work on testing depth of knowledge of vocabulary, where rather less progress has been made, both in defining depth as a construct and in developing tests for practical use. Another important perspective is the use of vocabulary within particular contexts of use or registers, and recent corpus research is extending our understanding of the lexical features of academic registers. This provides a basis for assessing learners’ ability to deploy their vocabulary knowledge effectively for functional communication in specific academic contexts. It is concluded that, while current tests of vocabulary knowledge are valuable for certain purposes, they need to be complemented by more contextualised measures of vocabulary use.
Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 2015
In this study, I review four papers by Stoeckel and Bennett; Shin; McDonald and Asaba; and McLean, Kramer, and Stewart. I will then summarize the validation evidence reported in each paper, in order to argue for the validity of the interpretations of the test scores as well as the uses of the tests considered in these four studies. This will help clarify areas of future research and strengthen the need for ties between specialists in the field of second language vocabulary assessment and general language assessment.
The role of vocabulary is essential in second language acquisition as vocabulary knowledge is the basis for communication, and it is also emphasized by the basis that grammatical errors still result in understandable structures, while
2004
Vocabulary is an important component in language learning,as it pervades all four skill areas of listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Vocabulary knowledge considerably helps language learners in both comprehension and production. In fact,some students of elementary proficiency,who know little grammar,can not only guess the meanings of even cognitively demanding reading materials but also produce understandable sentences as long as they have vocabulary knowledge from a dictionary or other sources. Indeed, vocabulary knowledge plays a significant role in English proficiency. Thus,research on the subject should not be neglected. One means of measuring language proficiency that has been gaining attention recently among Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages(TESOL)professionals has been self-assessment,also referred to as self-evaluation. The following study,which partially replicates an investigation done by Laufer and Yano (2001), examines the accuracy of self-assessment...
2013
Reading Research Quarterly, 2007
The authors assert that, in order to teach vocabulary more effectively and better understand its relation to comprehension, we need first to address how vocabulary knowledge and growth are assessed. They argue that “vocabularly assessment is grossly undernourished, both in its theoretical and practical aspects—that it has been driven by tradition, convenience, psychometric standards, and a quest for economy of effort rather than a clear conceptualization of its nature and relation to other aspects of reading expertise, most notably comprehension.”
International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1997
The main argument of this article is that the treatment of foreign language vocabulary in an educational context will vary predictably according to whether the pedagogical activity is founded on a structural or a lexicdcollocational view of language. It is argued that in a structural approach, for which the author expresses a preference, vocabulary learning is primarily a frequency-and input-based individual endeavor, whereas the lexical approach is said to be more teachingand textbook-oriented. As a consequence, there will also be a difference in the way vocabulary is tested. It is argued that a statistical testing method is more suitable in a structural context, whereas the lexical context will call for teaching-based tests.
With the growing interest in research in second language vocabulary acquisition and pedagogical practices related to it, the teaching of vocabulary in institutions has become an integral part of language instruction. Researchers in second language acquisition argue in favor of vocabulary instruction as research suggests that language proficiency is greatly influenced by learners’ vocabulary size and the knowledge involved in it. However, it has been observed that teachers fail to measure the knowledge acquired from vocabulary instruction in view of the incremental nature of vocabulary knowledge growth; and limit the knowledge of a word to its lexical meaning, thus, ignoring other aspects of word knowledge. This underscores the ‘sensitive’ incremental nature of vocabulary knowledge growth involved in a word. With twenty Odia speakers of English studying intermediate, the researcher tried to investigate the effect of ‘sensitive’ tests designed around aspects of word knowledge such as spelling, grammatical form, meaning and association on learners’ productive knowledge of vocabulary. The findings suggested that use of such ‘sensitive’ tests helped learners use the target words productively with a mean score of 9.14 from a total score of ten in the productive vocabulary test.
Vocabulary constitutes an important component of language and its study has attracted the interest of second-language (L2) and foreign-language (FL) teachers and applied language researchers, booming in the 1990s (cf. for example Ellis 1992, Read 2000). Among other things, this interest has been characterised by the attention paid to testing learners’ knowledge of vocabulary. The dimensional approach to vocabulary knowledge as proposed by Henriksen (1999), i.e. vocabulary size, depth, and receptive-productive knowledge/skills, has influenced test design for measuring L2/FL vocabulary acquisition. This article aims to describe the major vocabulary tests along the vocabulary dimensions and highlights what testing under this approach has contributed to the teaching of vocabulary. To this end, it reviews some major L2/FL vocabulary tests alongside the above dimensions, focusing on the pedagogical consequences that followed testing. The review shows that testing has not been an end in itself. The extensive investigation of vocabulary size has led to standardisation of methods, as well as insight into how to determine the amount of vocabulary needed at different learning stages. Furthermore, it has influenced the development of course materials for fostering vocabulary growth. However, testing depth and productive knowledge still lags behind. Despite progress made in this regard, scholars have not succeeded in measuring the two dimensions in a standardised manner, nor have they determined the extent of depth and productive knowledge associated with different learning stages. Given the importance of speaking and writing (i.e. productive use rather than mere comprehension), suggestions for future directions are discussed.
The Oxford Handbook of Rhetoric and Political Theory, 2023
College Music Symposium, 2016
RIEV, Revista Internacional de Estudios Vascos / International Journal on Basque Studies, 2018
REVISTA DOXA DIGITAL
Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University, Natural Science Edition, 2022
Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 2011
Revista de Saúde Pública, 2007
9783737015035, 2023
Critical Care Medicine, 2008
Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 2016
Twenty-Sixth Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals
Panorama Socioeconomico, 2013
Revue internationale et stratégique, 2008