Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
18 pages
1 file
2006
, it was held under the auspices of the European Network of Housing Researchers. We are grateful to the conference organisers for allowing us to lead a number of sessions on the topic of 'Home ownership and risk', at which the papers, subsequently rewritten as chapters here, were presented. We also wish to acknowledge the support of the European Union for its funding of the OSIS project in which the three editors are involved. OSIS-Origins of Security and Insecurity: the interplay of housing systems with jobs, household structures, finance and social security-is a pan-European study with research partners drawn from nine member states and is funded under the framework six programme (CIT2-CT-2003-506007). Further details of OSIS can be obtained from www.osis.bham.ac.uk.
Critical Housing Analysis, 2015
2008
The positive health effects of owner-occupation, compared to renting, are well documented. But home ownership is itself heterogeneous, as is the health profile of its incumbents, and this is less well recognised. Drawing from a mixed-methods study, which includes 150 qualitative interviews with a cross-section of UK mortgage holders, this paper examines the health implications of a definitive feature of owned housing: its role as a financial tool. In particular, we ask whether there is anything about the process of accumulating wealth into housing or spending from this resource, that enhances well-being (or that adds to psycho-social stress). This question is timely, coming at the end of a long-wave of house-price appreciation, in a setting where it is easy to borrow from housing wealth, under a policy regime that looks increasingly to owned homes as an asset base for welfare. The answer casts light on whether, in what circumstances, to what extent, and by what mechanism, home ownership -the dominant housing tenure of the English-speaking world -might enhance the well-being of individuals, communities and societies.
In the late twentieth century, homeownership became entrenched in a wider societal project associated with transformations in the economy and increased social inclusion. The ‘promise of homeownership’ asserted the potential of mortgaged owner-occupation in providing all with not just a stable home, but also the chance to accumulate assets and establish economic security. Underlying these ideologies was the implicit promise that homeownership can be widespread, equalizing and secure. Despite transformations in market conditions, especially since the Global Financial Crisis, such narratives have continued to drive policy approaches and support for marketised housing. Through an investigation of three ‘homeowner societies’ – the US, UK and Australia - the empirical evidence in this paper reveals declining access to homeownership, high levels of housing wealth concentration exacerbating social inequality, and intensifying housing price volatility undermining asset security. The paper contends that the socioeconomic potential of homeownership that has sustained the logic of housing policy for the last half decade may be increasingly recognized as a ‘false promise’ that has justified growing housing commodification, ongoing labour insecurity, and continued state retrenchment wherein housing markets increasingly function as a dimension of growing inequality and insecurity.
International Journal of Housing Policy
In many Western countries the edges of ownership form a neglected zone between the majority tenure, sustainable owner-occupation, and the minority experience, long-term renting. In these tenure-divided societies, it is surprising that so little attention has been paid to the zone of transition between styles of accommodation, not least because the edges of ownership are now so precarious. The six papers included in this special issue advance empirical and conceptual understandings of these neglected zones, showing how, increasingly, they compromise the sustainability of housing solutions. Some approach this by developing an understanding of how the changing fungibility of housing wealth has transformed its welfare role, while at the same time exposing those on the edges of ownership to heightened levels of risk. A second set of papers report from a variety of jurisdictions to show how the structure of the edges of owner-occupation vary across cultures and countries, and change over time.
Housing, Theory and Society, 2017
Piketty (2014) wrote a thought provoking book on capital, how it evolved over the decades and the role of housing in it. Maclennan and Miao (2016) further elaborate on the work of Piketty and the role of housing, and on possible implications for housing policy. There is a whole range of literature demonstrating that housing more and more changed from a roof over the head into a key asset for households, and a key element in "asset based welfare" policies. The liberalization of financial markets improved access to home ownership and with that to the possibility to build housing equity. For many decades, in many countries encouraging home ownership was the key priority in housing policy and this priority was accompanied by the "dream of home ownership as an equaliser" in societies. However, the dream of the housing markets and home ownership as equalizer and a solution for welfare states is far from reality. Maclennan and Miao (2017) therefore, conclude that it is time for a new "political economy for housing policy". This contribution reflects on the paper "Capital, housing and inequality in the 21st century" of Maclennan and Miao, and with that explores new principles for policies on housing. It advocates more emphasis on the roof over the head part of housing in housing policy and for tax policies to deal with intergenerational social equality including housing equity. Key Observations Maclennan and Miao (2016) focus on the economic debate and equality, and conclude that housing is critical influence on wealth patterns. The priority in housing policy for home ownership is underpinned by a number of wrong assumptions as Maclennan and Miao (2016) explain in their key observations.
American Journal of Sociology, 2005
Katalog 59, 2022
Waren es vor 2,6 bis 1,5 Millionen Jahren in Afrika Homo habilis und Homo rudolfensis, die diese frühen Werkzeuge herstellten, war hier ein Vertreter der Gattung Homo erectus für die Herstellung verantwortlich. Mit einem Alter von 400000 bis 300000 Jahren handelt es sich bei Choppern dieses Typus um die ältesten in Europa bekannten Werkzeuge aus (Früh-) Menschenhand.
Chapter 21 in The Routledge International Handbook of Globalization Studies (2016)
science publishing group, 2024
Sanat tarihi dergisi, 2012
International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 2024
Universidad Internacional de Andalucía, 2020
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2013
INContext: Studies in Translation and Interculturalism, 2021
BAEFE, 2022
Transportation Research Record, 1992
Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2016
Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE, 2013
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Nusantara (JIMNU)
Physiotherapy, 2016
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 2002