Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
21 pages
1 file
Economic crisis, fiscal austerity and the new demography of ageing societies have given rise to the idea of ‘asset-based welfare’ as a key complement of the UK’s shrinking welfare state. We scrutinise people’s views and strategies towards what might be paraphrased as ‘homeownership-based welfare’; we look at the opportunities/limitations for positioning housing wealth as a base for family welfare within and across cohorts and socioeconomic groups. By analysing 112 in-depth interviews with homeowners and tenants, we conclude that socioeconomic inequality challenges the potential for housing to form an ‘asset-based welfare’. The least affluent remain excluded and unable to make alternative provisions whereas the affluent have various assets to engage in the provision for their family welfare without having to resort to the wealth embedded in their home. In-between, numerous participants pursue strategies of homeownership/property-based welfare by traditional routes or increasingly by letting out buy-to-let or inherited property.
Critical Housing Analysis, 2015
In the late twentieth century, homeownership became entrenched in a wider societal project associated with transformations in the economy and increased social inclusion. The ‘promise of homeownership’ asserted the potential of mortgaged owner-occupation in providing all with not just a stable home, but also the chance to accumulate assets and establish economic security. Underlying these ideologies was the implicit promise that homeownership can be widespread, equalizing and secure. Despite transformations in market conditions, especially since the Global Financial Crisis, such narratives have continued to drive policy approaches and support for marketised housing. Through an investigation of three ‘homeowner societies’ – the US, UK and Australia - the empirical evidence in this paper reveals declining access to homeownership, high levels of housing wealth concentration exacerbating social inequality, and intensifying housing price volatility undermining asset security. The paper contends that the socioeconomic potential of homeownership that has sustained the logic of housing policy for the last half decade may be increasingly recognized as a ‘false promise’ that has justified growing housing commodification, ongoing labour insecurity, and continued state retrenchment wherein housing markets increasingly function as a dimension of growing inequality and insecurity.
Sociology of Health & Illness, 2009
The positive health effects of owner-occupation, compared to renting, are well documented. But home ownership is itself heterogeneous, as is the health profile of its incumbents, and this is less well recognised. Drawing from a mixed-methods study, which includes 150 qualitative interviews with a cross-section of UK mortgage holders, this paper examines the health implications of a definitive feature of owned housing: its role as a financial tool. In particular, we ask whether there is anything about the process of accumulating wealth into housing or spending from this resource, that enhances well-being (or that adds to psycho-social stress). This question is timely, coming at the end of a long-wave of house-price appreciation, in a setting where it is easy to borrow from housing wealth, under a policy regime that looks increasingly to owned homes as an asset base for welfare. The answer casts light on whether, in what circumstances, to what extent, and by what mechanism, home ownership -the dominant housing tenure of the English-speaking world -might enhance the well-being of individuals, communities and societies.
This article considers how welfare cuts in 'austerity Britain' have impacted young adults' access to a home of their own, asking at what stage in the life-course should the welfare state be expected to support someone's residential independence? The article focuses on the 2012 changed age-threshold for the Shared Accommodation Rate of Local Housing Allowance, which meant that single people (without depend-ants) aged between 25 and 34 are only entitled to claim the cost of a single room in a shared property. This policy has highlighted the issue of forced sharing, and poses questions as to whether a shared property with strangers can necessarily always be considered a home. The article identifies the persistence of normative conceptions of household transition across the life-course. Ultimately the article concludes that these normative assumptions enable policy makers to promote this policy as a matter of 'fairness' rather than a form of social injustice.
American Journal of Sociology, 2005
This paper introduces a theme section on knowledge limits in and after the financial crisis. It explores how and why practitioners have generally responded less conservatively to crisis than academics, and argues that academics within a variety of problematics could do more by reflecting critically on the heroic ideas about the role of knowledge which were current across the social sciences in the decade before the crisis. It then turns to introduce the section's papers before finally raising the possibility of a more explicitly political approach to understanding finance.
International Journal of Housing Policy, 2017
In which European countries is homeownership more financially advantageous? Explaining the size of the tenure wealth gap in 10 countries with different housing and welfare regimes.
International Journal of Housing Policy, 2014
In many countries, the demographic shift towards an ageing population is occurring against a backdrop of welfare state restructuring. The paradigm of asset-based welfare may become increasingly central to these developments as individualised welfare is touted as part of the response to the challenge of funding the care of an ageing population. This article focuses on the framing of housing wealth as a form of asset-based welfare in the UK context. We consider the strengths and weaknesses of housing as a form of asset-based welfare, both in terms of equity between generations and equality within them. We argue that housing market gains have presented many homeowners with significant, and arguably unearned, wealth and that policy-makers could reasonably expect that some of these assets be utilised to meet welfare needs in later life. However, the suitability of asset-based welfare as a panacea to the fiscal costs of an ageing population and welfare state retraction is limited by a number of potential practical and ethical concerns.
2006
, it was held under the auspices of the European Network of Housing Researchers. We are grateful to the conference organisers for allowing us to lead a number of sessions on the topic of 'Home ownership and risk', at which the papers, subsequently rewritten as chapters here, were presented. We also wish to acknowledge the support of the European Union for its funding of the OSIS project in which the three editors are involved. OSIS-Origins of Security and Insecurity: the interplay of housing systems with jobs, household structures, finance and social security-is a pan-European study with research partners drawn from nine member states and is funded under the framework six programme (CIT2-CT-2003-506007). Further details of OSIS can be obtained from www.osis.bham.ac.uk.
2010
"ABSTRACT The housing tenure structure has long been associated with different forms of welfare state capitalism in Western Europe. However, with the rise of owner occupancy, this association lost its straightforwardness. An alternative view is to view housing policies that promote owner occupancy for households to acquire assets, as an attempt by the state to reform social welfare systems. The politics of welfare reform are related to the discourses of home ownership ideology. The ownership of (housing) assets agenda serves as a means to change the relationship between state, market and individual households. This view is mostly based on the British experience and this paper seeks to broaden it by examining the Netherlands and Spain. The paper shows differences, but also that housing policies play an important role in driving towards or maintaining market-dominated solutions. Housing is used to either reorient towards or maintain a welfare system where asset ownership and market dependency is deemed more appropriate than secure income and public expenditure. "
Nawendî Roshinbîrî Duktor `Îzedîn, Silêmanî, 2023
Revista de Estudios Internacionales, 2024
Opfer der eigenen Begeisterung. : Festschrift für Harald Stadler zum 65. Geburtstag , 2024
Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2001
Kant-e-Prints, 2024
IKRAITH-HUMANIORA Vol 6 No 1, 2022
Hadashot Arkheologiyot 133, 2021
HIKMA, Revista de Traducción, 2024
Todas as Letras - Revista de Língua e Literatura, 2024
Chungará (Arica), 2004
Mathematical Biosciences, 2016
SSRN Electronic Journal
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2019
Updates in Surgery
Brazilian Journal of Development
Proceedings of the International Conferences ICT, Society, and Human Beings 2019; Connected Smart Cities 2019; and Web Based Communities and Social Media 2019, 2019