Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
5 pages
1 file
This short interview with Margaret Murray dates to the period when she was at the very height of her reputation as a witchcraft scholar.
TFH: The Journal of Folklore and History, 2022
Folkloristics in Britain passed through a period of intellectual torpor in the mid-twentieth century, particularly during the ascendancy within the Folklore Society (FLS) of Margaret Murray and Gerald Gardner. That it emerged relatively healthy is testament both to the better scholars who led its intellectual renaissance and to those who followed, people like Professor Jacqueline Simpson. The scars remain raw, however, and those triumphant scholars like Simpson, who have contributed to our disciplinary historiography, have been understandably short in their treatment of earlier trends. All broad historical summaries can erode nuance, and examination of some minor disagreements around one of Murray’s Presidential Addresses shows the ground on which the seeds of intellectual renaissance were cast. This article, originally written as a 90th birthday tribute to Simpson, examines the disagreement there and at subsequent public FLS lectures to flesh out more detail of the historical development and to enable a better understanding of later historiographical accounts of it.
2011
Les deux premières interviews de Margaret Drabble ont été effectuées à trois ans d'intervalle, chez elle dans le Somerset, en août 1989 puis à Londres en octobre 1992. Dans ce laps de temps, elle a publié A Natural Curiosity, suivi de The Gates of Ivory et a également démarré une longue recherche qui aboutira à une biographie d'Angus Wilson.
Many scholars point to the close association between early modern science and the rise of rational arguments in favour of the existence of witches. For some commentators, it is a poor reflection on science that its methods so easily leant themselves to the unjust persecution of innocent men and women. In this paper, I examine a debate about witches between a woman philosopher, Margaret Cavendish (1623-73), and a fellow of the Royal Society, Joseph Glanvill (1636-80). I argue that Cavendish is the voice of reason in this exchange—not because she supports the modern- day view that witches do not exist, but because she shows that Glanvill’s arguments about witches betray his own scientific principles. Cavendish’s responses to Glanvill suggest that, when applied consistently, the principles of early modern science could in fact promote a healthy scepticism toward the existence of witches.
Dr Margaret A Murray’s The Witch Cult in Western Europe (1921) theorised that medieval and modern witchcraft is a pagan religion. Murray asserted that contemporary witches were keeping alive an ancient fertility religion (now often referred to as the ‘Old Religion’). With her theory, Murray created the modern witch as the purveyor of fertility and designated paganism a ‘nature based religion’ that extolled the sacrality of nature and the individual’s role as caretaker whilst critiquing and distancing itself from the modern patriarchal destructive dominion over the earth and its natural resources. Despite its ultimate academic rejection, Murray’s ‘Old Religion’ is still thriving amongst adherents. This paper shall examine the two lives of the Murray thesis: it’s academic shame and how Murray’s antimodernist rhetoric has informed the ecological-mindedness of modern pagans.
Archaeology International, 2013
Margaret Murray, who was born 150 years ago, was one of the first archaeologists to be employed at UCL and one of the most distinguished, although her role in the history of archaeology is often underestimated. This article provides a brief outline of the career and contribution of a highly productive and innovative, if sometimes controversial, scholar, who also participated in the wider social movements of her time, particularly the campaign for women’s suffrage.
Magic, Ritual, and Witchcraft, 5 (2010), 188-212.
As a living language English sometimes follows an odd turn or two in bringing words forward from its past. One need not tell the dedicated J.R.R. Tolkien fan of the Professor's lifelong love of philology. He not only studied words, he invented them, borrowed them, revived them, and used them in imaginative ways that continue to resonate throughout academia and fandom today. Hence Tolkien probably would have appreciated the fact that the word "scholar" once meant simply "student", whereas today we associate it with one who is learned in a specific topic or area of interest. # # # Janet Croft currently edits Mythlore, the official journal of the Mythopoeic Society.
Actualidad Civil, 2022
Bezpieczeństwo granic-granice bezpieczeństwa, red. Dariusz Karczewski, Radosław Zenderowski, Warszawa 2023, s. 81-112, 2023
Revista pueblos y fronteras digital, 2024
Historia Religionum, 2021
Argumentos. Estudios críticos de la sociedad , 2023
Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение, 2024
2000
International Journal of Computer, 2024
The Herald Scotland, 2017
South African Archaeological Bulletin 76 (214): 43–56,, 2021
Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, 2015
IJCSP_216904, 2023
Behavioural Brain Research, 1995
2016
education journal, 2013
Oncogene, 1998
Ophthalmology, 2011