Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1976, History: Reviews of New Books
…
2 pages
1 file
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
This is a book on the history of the Byzantine Empire, one of the longest-lived and most important cultures in Western civilization, but also one of the least understood. The book is meant to be both concise and comprehensive, and as such it has been necessary to make a variety of decisions and sacrifices. The history of Byzantium is well over a thousand years in duration and any reason- able book on the subject must prepare the ground with consideration of the institutions and the issues of what came before; it must also consider the aftermath of the empire and the ways in which its culture has continued to affect our lives over the past 500 years. Given all that, serious thought had to be devoted to organization and to questions of inclusion and focus.
Der vorliegende Band konnte im Rahmen des Nationales Forschungs-, Entwicklungsund Innovationsbüro -NKFIH-Forschungsprojekts ,,Társadalmi kontextus a szövegkritika tükrében: Bizáncon innen és túl" (NN 124539) und des vom Ministerium für Nationale Ressourcen unterstützten Projekts für ungarische Fachkollegien NTP-SZKOLL-17-0025 realisiert werden.
D. Dzino & K. Parry (eds.), Byzantium, its neighbors and its cultures. Byzantina Australiensia 20 (Australian Association for Byzantine Studies: Brisbane, 2014), 1-9., 2014
Few themes are more important to or controversial in the current historical research into the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries of the Ottoman Empire than “decline.” An older, still axiomatic position sketched out most famously by Bernard Lewis places the imperial history in the framework of three and a half centuries of “inevitable decline.” An alternate approach, originating in the works of western historians such as Fernand Braudel, Roger Owen, Linda Darling, and Gábor Ágoston, to name but few, begins with the basic question of how an empire can sustain over three centuries of unrelenting decline. Locating itself in the latter alternative approach, the aim of this project is to shed light on the inadequacies of the declinist historiographical model by focusing on the Ottoman administrative practices in the western/Habsburg frontier with a special reference to the Köprülü restoration in the second half of the seventeenth century. This work suggests that although the Ottoman writers and the modern historians have argued about an Ottoman decline in the period, political and military achievements of the Köprülü viziers and flexible policies of the Ottoman pashas in the frontier prove the opposite.
draft toward AABS Biennial Conference, 2024
Against Anthony Kaldellis and others who believe that the name 'Byzantium' is an artificial and pejorative anachronism, this paper argues that there is neither a convincing substitute for 'Byzantium' nor a need for one. Specifically, (i) the name Romanía, though attested in contemporary documents, is semantically and historically weak; (ii) the claims of pernicious connotations in the name 'Byzantium' are overstated; and (iii) the reason that 'Roman' was preferred from the time of the first Christians is that 'Greek' was aggressively stigmatized and suppressed. The paper concludes that 'Byzantium' is ideologically sounder than the terms that would replace it. Demonstrating that the alternative names are historically forced, the paper proposes that we are better off with a resonant term-of-art than a pretence of authenticity that inadvertently continues a legacy of anti-Hellenism.
James/A Companion to Byzantium, 2010
The history of the empire is a monotonous story of the intrigues of priests, eunuchs and women. " (Lecky 1869 : 13-14). Of course, this is untrue. For a start, the intrigues of women, eunuchs, and priests are perpetually interesting, as any reader of historical fi ction will agree; for another thing, there is a great deal more to Byzantium than political history. But Lecky ' s comment tells us a great deal about what happened when Victorian morality and love of the Greek and Roman worlds came up against the " otherness " of post-Classical, Christian Byzantium, a world empire lasting over a thousand years and covering more than 1,000,000 square kilometers at its greatest extent, from Italy and North Africa to the Black Sea and the Levant (ODB vol. 1: 345). Byzantium has struggled in Western Europe beneath the burden of Edward Gibbon and the Enlightenment, condemning it for superstition and rampant (Orthodox) Christianity, and the nineteenth-century, pruriently appalled by what it liked to see as Byzantium ' s oriental corruption and luxury (Mango 1965). " Byzantine " in English immediately suggests the complicated, infl exible and underhand. The dubious, devious Byzantines themselves are condemned out of hand for their tedious history (all emperors with the same name), lack of literature (where is the Byzantine Iliad or Odyssey ? Tragedy, comedy or poetry?), unrealistic art all looking the same (seen one icon, seen them all), overmastering clericalism (what chance does a theocracy have in any " Age of Reason? "), and general lack of fun. W. B. Yeats has a lot to answer for (Sailing to Byzantium 1927; Byzantium 1930). Byzantium is both too big and too complicated. Despite its Christian nature and its inheritance of the classical world, it seems too strange, bizarre, and alien in its use of both. One of the problems for Western Europeans, educated to believe that the Classics and the Renaissance are the two high points of civilization, is that Byzantium is neither. There has been an eagerness to judge in our terms, measuring Byzantium against what " we " believe to have quality, and an unwillingness to understand Byzantium in its own terms, to consider how it used and developed its Greco-Roman heritage into something different but nevertheless worth our attention. This volume is
Harvard Middle East and Islamic Review, 4, no. 1–2, 1999
Is America in decline? Or is it going through a difficult period that some Americans have misinterpreted as such? Is declinism-a term that some editors have grudgingly accepted as an accurate if awkward description of the phenomenon-a faithful reflection of American realities? Or does it provide "better indications of American psychology than of American power"? 1 Are all discussions of American decline (in education, letters, economy, morals, social solidarity, etc.) ultimately about American power? Perhaps the intense public interest in the subject originally grew from the contrast between the U.S. economic recession and the vigorous growth in East Asia, and will now subside with the downturn of the once-challenging Japanese economy and healthy signals in the U.S. economy. But is "the decline of America" a matter of its economy? And if it is, should we rely on trends of a few years' duration to gauge a phenomenon as huge and unwieldy as decline? As a student of Ottoman history, I do not even know if the Ottoman empire declined. Until the 1970s, everyone was sure it had, but historians have since lost the self-confidence, or naivete, which allowed them the comforting taxonomies of "emergence," "golden age," and "decline." They have also become aware that arguments about decline or its lack, past or present, are hardly ever constructed with rigor and often serve various agendas. There is something odd and yet instructive about being in America in the late twentieth century and studying an Ottoman declinism that started just before the year 1000 of the Hegira (1591/2 c.E.). One is surrounded by two worlds imbued ~ith a sense of decline and with elaborate discourses which revolve around similar themes. Influential-Ottoman authors, like Gelibolulu Mu~tafii 'Ali and-Katib-<;elebi;lamented "the closing of the Ottoman mind" as a result of falling
2016
The Oxford Handbooks series is a major new initiative in academic publishing. Each volume offers an authoritative and state-of-the-art survey of current thinking and research in a particular subject area. Specially commissioned essays from leading international figures in the discipline give critical examinations of the progress and direction of debates. Oxford Handbooks provide scholars and graduate students with compelling new perspectives upon a wide range of subjects in the humanities and social sciences. Also published by OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
2016
Indo Nordic Authors’ Collective, 2024
Fashion Highlight, 2023
Urban Studies Special Issue: Long-Term Intergenerational Perspectives on Urban Sustainability Transitions, 2024
Prosiding Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya (KOLITA)
A quoi sert l' …, 1996
Majalah Kesehatan
Conservation Genetics, 2010
Chemistry Letters, 1994
La educación como proceso de construcción ¿Qué educación tenemos hoy?, 2022
Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 2022
Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2016
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2012