PIECEWISE LINEAR MAPS WITH HETEROGENEOUS CHAOS
arXiv:1811.01009v4 [math.DS] 7 Oct 2022
YOSHITAKA SAIKI∗ , HIROKI TAKAHASI† , AND JAMES A YORKE‡
Abstract. Chaotic dynamics can be quite heterogeneous in the sense that in some regions the
dynamics are unstable in more directions than in other regions. When trajectories wander between
these regions, the dynamics is complicated. We say a chaotic invariant set is heterogeneous when
arbitrarily close to each point of the set there are different periodic points with different numbers of
unstable dimensions. We call such dynamics heterogeneous chaos (or hetero-chaos). While we believe
it is common for physical systems to be hetero-chaotic, few explicit examples have been proved to
be hetero-chaotic. Here we present two explicit dynamical systems that are particularly simple and
tractable with computer. It will give more intuition as to how complex even simple systems can be.
Our maps have one dense set of periodic points whose orbits are 1D unstable and another dense set
of periodic points whose orbits are 2D unstable. Moreover, they are ergodic relative to the Lebesgue
measure.
Key words. baker map, non-hyperbolic system, periodic orbit, ergodicity
AMS subject classifications. 37A25, 37D30
1. Introduction. Picture a chaotic trajectory in a heterogeneous attractor:
there are a variety of regions Rk where the local dynamics are expanding in k directions and these occur for a variety of values of k. This picture may be representative
of most high-dimensional chaotic attractors. It suggests the existence of periodic orbits with different unstable dimensions. Different periodic orbits can have different
unstable dimensions, each of which type can be dense. We call such maps or dynamics “hetero-chaotic”, a term defined more precisely below. Hetero-chaos may be more
widespread than currently acknowledged.
Due to the difficulty in detecting such periodic orbits practically, various approaches have been considered. For example, the number of positive finite-time Lyapunov exponents were used to detect the coexistence of periodic orbits of different
unstable dimensions in low-dimensional maps [4, 5, 11]. Periodic orbits of different
unstable dimensions were used to discuss the occurrence of on-off intermittency [15].
For a continuous-time atmospheric model, Gritsun [8, 9] found many periodic orbits
with a wide variety of unstable dimensions, all coexisting in the same system. For the
high dimensional Lorenz equation [13], periodic orbits with different unstable dimensions were numerically detected in a single chaotic attractor [17]. These and other
numerical results have created among scientists, including applied mathematicians, a
strong need for a simple model which qualitatively describes hetero-chaos.
Theoretical results on hetero-chaos came earlier than numerical ones. The existence of diffeomorphisms in which periodic orbits of different unstable dimensions are
mixed was already known since the 60s [1, 2, 14, 19, 20]. These theoretical results
are aimed at obtaining a global picture on dynamics of “most” diffeomorphisms of
a compact Riemannian manifold, and not aimed at understanding specific physical
systems. To our knowledge, there is no rigorous proof that in any specific physical
system hetero-chaos can actually occur.
∗ Graduate School of Business Administration, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo 186-8601, Japan
(
[email protected])
† Keio Institute of Pure and Applied Sciences (KiPAS), Department of Mathematics, Keio University, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan (
[email protected])
‡ Institute for Physical Science and Technology, Department of Mathematics and Department of
Physics, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742, USA (
[email protected])
1
2
Y. SAIKI, H. TAKAHASI AND J. A. YORKE
(a)
(b)
Fig. 1: The homogeneous chaotic baker maps “2D-baker” and “3D-baker”.
The images of rectangles or boxes are denoted by primes ′ so for example A maps to
A′ . (a): The 2D-baker map is defined by splitting [0, 1]2 into three equal-sized vertical
rectangles. The square [0, 1]2 is mapped to itself, by x 7→ τ (x) in Eq. (1.1). Each
vertical rectangle on the left maps to a different horizontal rectangle on the right,
stretched horizontally and contracted vertically. (b): We define a 3D-baker map by
slicing [0, 1]3 into four equal-sized breadbox-shaped boxes as shown. The cube [0, 1]3
is mapped to itself, by x 7→ 2x mod 1 and z 7→ 2z mod 1.
Several simple models have been introduced and investigated which are relevant
to hetero-chaos. For a 2D coupled tent map [16], Glendinning [7] proved the density of
repellers in the attractor, while the density of saddles in the attractor is not known.
The result of Dı́az et al. [6] suggests the existence of a hetero-chaos in a certain
Hénon-like family. Kostelich et al. [11] introduced a skew-product type analytic two
dimensional map. For this map with a certain parameter setting, Das and Yorke [3]
proved the existence of a hetero-chaotic attractor with a quasi-periodic orbit. In [17],
hetero-chaotic piecewise linear maps were announced without proofs.
The goal of this paper is to verify the existence of hetero-chaos in piecewise linear
maps as in [17]. We divide a space (a square [0, 1]2 or cube [0, 1]3 ) into several
homogeneous regions with different expansion properties. Figure 1(a) has only one
region R1 and Fig. 1(b) has only one region R2 , while Figs. 2 and 3 have regions R1
and R2 where the dynamics are one- and two-dimensionally expanding, respectively.
To emphasize the meandering nature of the dynamics, we focus on periodic orbits that
spend different amounts of time in the regions Rk for different values of k. Periodic
orbits are structures that can be found numerically. The variability of their unstable
dimensions is a signature of the heterogeneity of the system.
1.1. Hetero-chaos. Let F : M → M be a piecewise differentiable map. We say
a point p ∈ M is a periodic point of period n if F n (p) = p. Let p be a periodic point
of period n and assume that F n is differentiable at p. The number of eigenvalues
of the Jacobian matrix DF n (p) outside the unit disk {z ∈ C : |z| ≤ 1} counted with
multiplicity is called the unstable dimension of p. If the unstable dimension of p
is equal to k, we say p is k-unstable. We say p is hyperbolic if no eigenvalue of
DF n (p) lies on the unit circle.
We say an invariant set Λ ⊂ M (i.e., F (Λ) = Λ) is chaotic if
(i) Λ is an uncountable closed set.
(ii) the set of hyperbolic periodic points is dense in Λ, and
(iii) Λ has a dense trajectory, i.e., there exists x0 ∈ Λ such that the set
(F n (x0 ))n∈N is dense in Λ, where N denotes the set of non-negative integers.
PIECEWISE LINEAR MAPS WITH HETEROGENEOUS CHAOS
3
2
Fig. 2: The 2D hetero-chaos
baker
into
2 map.
1The
square
2 [0, 1] 1is divided
four
1
rectangles A = 0, 3 × [0, 1] , B = 3 , 1 × 0, 2 , C = 3 , 1 × 2 , 1 , D = 13 , 23 ×
[0, 1] . The 2D-HC map F expands each rectangle horizontally to full width as shown.
The region R1 = A ∪ D is contracted vertically. The region R2 = B ∪ C is expanded
in both coordinates so that each of the images of B and C covers [0, 1]2 . Hence R1
and R2 are regions of one- and two-dimensional instability. While the maps in Fig. 1
are one-to-one almost everywhere, this map is not.
We say Λ is hetero-chaotic if (i), (iii) and the following hold:
(ii′ ) for at least two values of k, the set of k-unstable hyperbolic periodic points
is dense in Λ.
We say F is hetero-chaotic on Λ. In the case Λ = M we simply say F is hetero-chaotic,
or has heterogeneous chaos, or more briefly hetero-chaos or even HC.
1.2. Baker maps. We begin with the well-known “baker map” (Fig. 1(a)). We
refer to it as the 2D-baker map. It was introduced by Seidel [18], where the square
is divided into q equal vertical strips. Seidel used q = 10. We use q = 3, though
q = 2 is most common in the literature. Each strip is mapped by a map F to a
horizontal strip by squeezing it vertically by the factor 13 and stretching it horizontally
by the factor 3. The resulting horizontal strips are laid out covering the square [0, 1]2 .
There, all periodic points are 1-unstable. We show a three-dimensional version that
we call a “3D-baker map” in Fig. 1(b). All periodic points of the 3D-baker map are
2-unstable. The baker maps here are area or volume preserving and are one-to-one
almost everywhere. When all periodic points have the same unstable dimension, we
call the chaos homogeneous.
1.3. 3D hetero-chaos baker map. We modify the two baker maps in Fig. 1
to hetero-chaotic maps, which we call the “2D-HC” and “3D-HC” maps respectively,
as in Figs. 2 and 3. We consider these as prototypes for understanding attractors
with far higher dimensions.
The 3D-HC map F is defined as follows. Define τ : [0, 1] → [0, 1] by
(1.1)
τ (x) =
(
3x mod 1
1
for 0 ≤ x < 1,
for x = 1.
4
Y. SAIKI, H. TAKAHASI AND J. A. YORKE
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 3: (a) The 3D hetero-chaos baker map. Here the XZ plane plays the role
of XZ in Fig. 2 and the Y coordinate has been added. Here [0, 1]3 is partitioned
into four regions A, B, C, D and each of them is mapped into a region of the same
volume. The sets A and D each have volume 31 and expand in the X direction and
contracting in the Y and Z directions. The sets B and C both have volume 61 and
expand in X and Z directions and contracting in the Y direction. (b) The graph
of τ (x). (c) The graph of σ(y). The first branch has slope 23 while the other two
branches have slope 6. The red and blue boxes are enlarged in Fig. 5.
Then
(1.2)
τ (x),
τ (x),
F ((x, y, z)) =
τ (x),
τ (x),
2
3
5
6
2
1
3 y,
2z
1
+ 6 y,
2z
+ 61 y, −1 + 2z
1
1
2
3 y, 2 + 2 z
on
on
on
on
A
B
C
D,
PIECEWISE LINEAR MAPS WITH HETEROGENEOUS CHAOS
5
where
1
A = 0,
× [0, 1] × [0, 1] ;
3
1
2
;
B = , 1 × [0, 1] × 0,
3
2
2
1
C=
, 1 × [0, 1] × , 1 ;
3
2
1 2
× [0, 1] × [0, 1] .
,
D=
3 3
Note that the map F is differentiable and one-to-one except on the points in the
boundaries of A, B, C, D where it is discontinuous and at most three-to-one. With
a slight abuse of notation, we fix a piecewise linear map F −1 on [0, 1]3 satisfying
F ◦ F −1 (x, y, z) = (x, y, z) on F ([0, 1]3 ). For n ≥ 1, let F −n denote the n-composition
of F −1 . The map F −1 has many of the features of F . The Y coordinate y ′ of
F −1 (x, y, z) depends only on y, so we define σ : [0, 1] → [0, 1] by y ′ = σ(y). See
Figs. 3(c) and 5(b).
Let F be the 3D-HC map and let π : [0, 1]3 → [0, 1]2 be the projection π(x, y, z) =
(x, z). We define the 2D-HC map by
F2D (x, z) = π(F (x, 0, z)).
Note that π ◦ F = F2D ◦ π. We will omit the subscript and write F to denote both
the 2D-HC map and the 3D-HC map.
1.4. Heterogeneous chaos. Figure 4 shows parts of sets of hyperbolic periodic
points numerically detected from the 2D-HC map. It suggests that the set of 1unstable hyperbolic periodic points is dense, and the set of 2-unstable hyperbolic
periodic points is also dense. We prove this as a main result of this paper.
Theorem 1.1. The 2D-HC and 3D-HC maps are hetero-chaotic.
A well-known argument for showing the density of periodic points relies on the
use of a Markov partition [10]. However, hetero-chaotic systems never admit Markov
partitions. The lack of a Markov partition for our maps is due to the fact that the
Z direction is neither uniformly contracting or expanding. For example, the 2D-HC
map has a segment { 41 } × (0, 1) of periodic points of period 2. The corresponding
segment of periodic points for the 3D-HC map is {( 41 , 15
16 )} × (0, 1). No subshift of
finite type on finitely many symbols can model our maps since such a subshift has
only countably many periodic points.
In Secs. 2 and 3 we prove Thm. 1.1. Our idea is to recover geometric features of
a Markov partition which lead to the heterochaos. A key ingredient is a brick that
we introduce in Sec. 2. We construct special bricks carefully analyzing the expansion
rates in the Z direction, and establish one part of Thm. 1.1 on periodic points of the
3D-HC map. This geometric construction can be adapted to showing the existence of
a dense trajectory in [0, 1]3 , (Thm. 2.7), thereby establishing the heterochaos for the
3D-HC map. Since the projection π maps each dense trajectory for the 3D-HC map
to that for the 2D-HC map, and each periodic point for the 3D-HC map to that for
the 2D-HC map preserving the unstable directions, the heterochaos for the 2D-HC
map follows.
6
Y. SAIKI, H. TAKAHASI AND J. A. YORKE
(a)
(b)
Fig. 4: Sets of k-unstable hyperbolic periodic points of the 2D-HC map.
(a): k = 1 (periods 2-10 (blue), periods 11-13 (red)) (b): k = 2 (periods 2-10 (blue),
periods 11-13 (red)).
1.5. Ergodicity. The 2D-HC map preserves area and the 3D-HC map preserves
volume. It is natural to ask if they are ergodic. We say F is ergodic if for each
R-valued continuous function φ on the space, the trajectory average
n−1
1X
φ(F i (p))
hφi(p) = lim
n→∞ n
i=0
(1.3)
exists and coincides for almost every initial point p.
Theorem 1.2 (Ergodicity). The 2D-HC and 3D-HC maps are ergodic.
In Sec. 3 we prove Thm. 1.2. A key observation for the 3D-HC map is that a set
of the form {x} × [0, 1]2, which we will call a leaf at x, is mapped into the leaf at τ (x).
The ergodicity would follow immediately from the ergodicity of τ [21, Theorem 1.11],
if each leaf shrank to a point under forward iteration. In fact some leaves do not
shrink, notably those containing 2-unstable periodic points. We show that almost
every leaf shrinks to a point under forward iteration (Prop. 3.1), and use this result
to establish the ergodicity of the 3D-HC map. Using the projection π one can quickly
deduce the ergodicity of the 2D-HC map.
In the same way we can show that F × F is ergodic, and hence F is weak mixing
[21, Theorem 1.24]. The following is an immediate consequence of this. We say a pair
p1 , p2 of points in the space is a scrambled pair [12] if
lim inf dist(F n (p1 ), F n (p2 )) = 0
n→∞
and
lim sup dist(F n (p1 ), F n (p2 )) = diam,
n→∞
where dist denotes the Euclidean distance and diam denotes the diameter of the space.
Theorem 1.3. Let F be the 2D-HC or the 3D-HC map. Then almost every pair
is a scrambled pair.
1.6. Homogeneous regions and index sets. For the 3D-HC map F , we provide some understanding of the dynamics between different regions of [0, 1]3 . Set
R1 = A ∪ D
and R2 = B ∪ C,
PIECEWISE LINEAR MAPS WITH HETEROGENEOUS CHAOS
(a)
7
(b)
Fig. 5: Detail of Fig. 3 showing parts of the domains of τ (x) and σ(y). (a):
This is the restriction
of τ to [0, 12 ], the smallest interval containing all the x values
T∞
−n
of points in n=0 F (R1 ). The endpoints 0 and 21 are fixed points of τ . The slope
is 3. (b): This is theTrestriction of σ to [ 54 , 1], the smallest interval containing all the
∞
y values of points in n=0 F n (R2 ). The endpoints 45 and 1 are fixed points of σ. The
slope is 6.
and define
H1 =
∞
\
F −n (R1 ) and H2 =
n=−∞
∞
\
F −n (R2 ).
n=−∞
The unstable and stable dimensions of all the points in H1 are 1 and 2, and the
unstable and stable dimensions of all the points in H2 are 2 and 1. These two sets,
called index sets [17], are the source of heterogeneous chaos. See Fig. 6.
The heteroclinic sets H1,2 and H2,1 are the following:
H2,1 =
H1,2 =
∞
[
m=0
∞
[
F
−m
F −m
m=0
∞
\
n=0
∞
\
F
−n
!
(R1 )
!
F −n (R2 )
n=0
∩
∩
∞
[
m=0
∞
[
m=0
F
m
Fm
∞
\
n=0
∞
\
n
!
F (R2 ) ,
!
F n (R1 ) .
n=0
These sets can be described in more detail as follows: p ∈ H2,1 if and only if p is in
the stable set of a point in H1 and is in the unstable set of a point in H2 , i.e., there
are integers n+ (p) ≥ 0 and n− (p) ≤ 0 such that F n (p) ∈ R1 for all n ≥ n+ (p) and
F n (p) ∈ R2 for all n ≤ n− (p). The set H1,2 can be described analogously, switching
∗
∗
the subscripts 1 and 2. Two subsets H2,1
and H1,2
defined by
∗
H2,1
=
∗
H1,2
=
∞
\
n=0
∞
\
n=0
F −n (R1 ) ∩
F −n (R2 ) ∩
∞
\
n=1
∞
\
F n (R2 ) ⊂ H2,1 ,
F n (R1 ) ⊂ H1,2 ,
n=1
∗
are easy to visualize as shown in Fig. 6. For example H2,1
is the set of p ∈ H2,1 for
+
−
which n (p) = 0 and n (p) = −1.
8
Y. SAIKI, H. TAKAHASI AND J. A. YORKE
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6: The index sets for the 3D-HC map. (a): The 1D unstable index set
H1 shown in red lies in the plane y = 0. The 2D unstable index set H2 shown in
blue lies in the plane x = 1. All are shown in the cube partitioned according to the
symbol sets of F −1 . The vertical (green) arrows show the stable directions of H1 and
H2 ; the horizontal (red) arrows show their unstable directions. See the text for the
∗
∗
heteroclinic sets H1,2
(⊂ H1,2 ) (a straight line segment), H2,1
(⊂ H2,1 ) (the product of
two crudely drawn Cantor sets with a straight line segment parallel to the Z-axis).
See also Fig. 5. (b): A symbolic representation of the mutual intersections of the
stable and unstable sets of H1 and H2 .
1.7. A modified 3D-HC map without a dominant expanding direction.
In choosing the definition of the 3D-HC map, we have for simplicity chosen to have a
dominant expanding direction, the X direction. An alternative formulation of Fig. 3
replaces the region B with regions with regions Bi , 1 ≤ i ≤ k stacked vertically. See
Fig. 7. In the case k > 4, the locally dominant expanding direction is Z for 32 < x < 1
and is X for 0 < x < 23 . Our results hold for these modified maps. Our proof of
2/3
ergodicity requires 21 k 1/3 6= 1 which is true if k 6= 4. In the case k < 4, one can
show the ergodicity of F −1 using the argument in this paper. The ergodicity of F −1
implies that for F .
2. Establishing heterogeneous chaos. This section is devoted to the proof
of Thm. 1.1. After preliminaries in Sec. 2.1, we introduce (j, k)-bricks in Sec. 2.2, as
a tool to prove the existence of a hyperbolic periodic point. In Sec. 2.3 we display
(j, k)-bricks for the 3D-baker map, and use them to show the density of hyperbolic
periodic points. This argument is a paraphrase of the standard one by way of a
Markov partition, and does not work for the 3D-HC map. To obtain an expansion in
the Z direction required in the definition of a (j, k)-brick, we introduce biased points
in Sec. 2.4, and from them construct (j, k)-bricks in Sec. 2.5. In Sec. 2.6 we establish
one part of Thm. 1.1 on hyperbolic periodic points of the 3D-HC map. In Sec. 2.7 we
show the existence of a dense trajectory and complete the proof of Thm. 1.1.
2.1. Boxes and symbol sets. We say a set Q ⊂ [0, 1]3 is a box if it is the
Cartesian product of three non-empty intervals. Two kinds of boxes that will repeatedly occur deserve special attention. In the spirit of the baker of the baker map, we
name them after two boxes a baker might use. We say a box Q is a breadbox if
PIECEWISE LINEAR MAPS WITH HETEROGENEOUS CHAOS
9
Fig. 7: A modified 3D-HC map without a dominant expanding direction.
A modified 2D-HC map can be similarly defined.
Fig. 8: Construction of a brick containing a periodic point. This figure shows
a key concept for the proof of the existence of a 2-unstable periodic point in (0, 1)3 for
the 3D-baker or the 3D-HC map. The box Q0 ⊂ (0, 1)3 is chosen to be an “interior
(j, k)-brick”, thereby guaranteeing that there is a periodic point p0 ∈ Q−j ∩ Qk of
period j + k. It follows that F j (p0 ) ∈ Q0 is a periodic point of period j + k.
precisely one coordinate has length 1. For example, if its X coordinate has length 1,
we can call Q an X breadbox. If Q has precisely two coordinates of length 1, we call it
a pizzabox. For example, if its X and Z coordinates have length 1, we call Q an XZ
pizzabox. For the 3D-HC map F , A and D are Y Z pizzaboxes and A′ = F (A) and
D′ = F (D) are X breadboxes. Similarly, B and C are Y breadboxes and B ′ = F (B)
and C ′ = F (C) are XZ pizzaboxes.
For the 3D-baker or the 3D-HC map F , we refer to the boxes A, B, C, D as
symbol sets for F . On each symbol set, F has the form
(2.1)
p 7→ (cX (p) + dX (p)x, cY (p) + dY (p)y, cZ (p) + dZ (p)z),
where p = (x, y, z) and the three c’s and d’s depend on the symbol set containing p.
Since the Jacobian matrix of such a map is diagonal, we refer to a map as in (2.1) as
a linear diagonal map. The inverse map F −1 is a linear diagonal map on each of
the boxes F (S), S ∈ {A, B, C, D} which are symbol sets for F −1 .
10
Y. SAIKI, H. TAKAHASI AND J. A. YORKE
2.2. Construction of hyperbolic periodic points from bricks. Let F be
the 3D-baker or the 3D-HC map. The X direction is unstable and the Y direction is
stable, in that dX = 3 > 1 and dY Q
< 1 on every symbol set. If p is a periodic point
n−1
of period n, the number χZ (p) = i=0 dZ (F i (p)) determines the type of p: it is
2-unstable if χZ (p) > 1, and 1-unstable if χZ (p) < 1.
We introduce a key ingredient for constructing a 2-unstable periodic point of F .
Let j, k ∈ N and assume k ≥ 1. For a box Q0 and an integer −j ≤ i ≤ k we write
Qi = F i (Q0 ), Qi = Qi X × Qi Y × Qi Z . We say Q0 is a (j, k)-brick if
◦ for each −j ≤ i ≤ k − 1, Qi is a subset of some symbol set for F ;
◦ Qk is an XZ pizzabox;
◦ Q−j is a Y breadbox.
We say a (j, k)-brick Q0 is an interior (j, k)-brick, or simply an interior brick if
Q−j X , Q−j Z ⊂ (0, 1) and Qk Y ⊂ (0, 1).
The notion of an interior brick is motivated by the fixed point theorem of a
contraction mapping: let J be a bounded interval and f : J → J be a map of the form
f (x) = c + dx, c, d ∈ R such that f (J) is contained in the interior of J. Then there
is a unique fixed point of f in the interior of J. The following proposition extends
this idea to the 3D-HC map, see Fig. 8. The proof is standard but is included for
completeness.
Proposition 2.1. Let F be either the 3D-baker map or the 3D-HC map. Let
j ≥ 0, k ≥ 1 and let Q0 be an interior (j, k)-brick. Then the interior of Q0 contains
a 2-unstable hyperbolic periodic point of period j + k.
Proof. Since Q0 is a (j, k)-brick, F j+k |Q−j : Q−j → Qk is a linear diagonal map
as in (2.1) where dX , dZ > 1 and dY < 1. Since Q0 is an interior (j, k)-brick, Q−j X ⊂
(0, 1) and the X coordinate of F j+k |Q−j maps Q−j X linearly onto [0, 1), so it has
unique fixed point in (0, 1). The same is true for the Z coordinate. The Y coordinate of
F j+k |Q−j maps Q−j Y linearly onto an interval whose closure is contained in (0, 1). In
each case there is a unique fixed point, whose coordinates we denote as x−j , y−j , z−j ,
each in the interiors of Q−j X , Q−j Y , Q−j Z respectively. Then p = (x−j , y−j , z−j ) is
in the interior of Q−j and is a fixed point of F j+k . Then F j (p) ∈ Q0 is a fixed point
for F j+k . Since dX , dZ > 1 and dY < 1, F j (p) is a 2-unstable hyperbolic periodic
point of period j + k.
2.3. Bricks for the 3D-baker map. Let j, k ∈ N, k ≥ 1. All (j, k)-bricks for
the 3D-baker map F are of the form
b b+1
c c+1
a a+1
×
×
,
,
,
,
Qj,k (a, b, c) =
2k 2k
4j 4j
2k 2k
where a, b, c ∈ N and a, c ≤ 2k − 1 and b ≤ 4j − 1. Moreover, Qj,k (a, b, c) is an
c+1
interior (j, k)-brick if a, b, c > 0 and a+1
, b+1
4j , 2k < 1. For k > 1, such bricks map
2k
′ ′ ′
onto bricks: F (Qj,k (a, b, c)) = Qj+1,k−1 (a , b , c ), for some a′ , b′ , c′ ∈ N. Therefore,
there are a′ , b′ , c′ ∈ N for which
F k (Qj,k (a, b, c)) =Qj+k,0 (0, b′ , 0)
′
b
b′ + 1
× (0, 1) ,
= (0, 1) ×
,
4j+k 4j+k
F −j (Qj,k (a, b, c)) =Q0,j+k (a′ , 0, c′ )
′
′
a′ + 1
c
c′ + 1
a
×
(0,
1)
×
.
,
,
=
2j+k 2j+k
2j+k 2j+k
PIECEWISE LINEAR MAPS WITH HETEROGENEOUS CHAOS
11
It follows that almost every point of [0, 1]3 is contained in arbitrarily small bricks,
and hence 2-unstable hyperbolic periodic points of the 3D-baker map are dense.
2.4. Density of biased points. In Sec. 2.3 we have seen that almost every
point in [0, 1]3 is contained in an arbitrarily small interior brick, and hence 2-unstable
periodic points are dense. We extend this argument to the 3D-HC map. The new
difficulty is to determine the length of the box in the Z direction. To this end we
need some preliminary considerations.
For the rest of this subsection, let F be the 3D-HC map. We say p ∈ [0, 1]3 is
regular if for each n ∈ Z, F n (p) is in the interior of a symbol set for F . We say a
point p is irrational if each of its coordinates is irrational. The following proposition
is elementary, but we include a proof for readers’ convenience.
Proposition 2.2. Every irrational point in [0, 1]3 is regular. In particular, almost every point in [0, 1]3 is regular.
Proof. Any one-dimensional map x ∈ R 7→ c + dx ∈ R with c, d ∈ Q \ {0} maps
irrational numbers to irrational numbers. On each symbol set, F and F −1 are linear
diagonal maps, and each component has this form. Hence they map irrational points
to irrational points. Since there is no irrational point on the boundaries of symbol
sets and almost every point is irrational, the assertion follows.
If p ∈ [0, 1]3 is a regular point, then log2 dZ (F n (p)) = −1 if F n (p) ∈ R1 and
log2 dZ (F n (p)) = 1 if F n (p) ∈ R2 . We are interested in an atypical point for which
the latter case is predominant. Let m, n ∈ Z with m ≤ n and define
for m = n;
0
n−1
X
Φ(m, n; p) =
log2 dZ (F i (p)) for m < n.
i=m
We say a regular point p ∈ [0, 1]3 is a biased point if
(2.2)
lim Φ(m, 0; p) = +∞ and
m→−∞
lim Φ(0, n; p) = +∞.
n→+∞
Since τ is ergodic and the volume of R1 is 23 while that of R2 is 13 , typical trajectories
have more of the iterates in R1 than in R2 . Hence the set of biased points has measure
zero. Nonetheless, this set is dense in [0, 1]3 .
Proposition 2.3. The set {(x, y, z) ∈ [0, 1]3 : biased, z ∈
/ Q} is dense in [0, 1]3 .
Proof. Fix x0 , y0 ∈ (0, 1) such that the second condition in (2.2) holds for p =
(x
,
(2.2) holds for p = (0, y0 , 0). The sets Dx0 =
0 0, 0) and the first condition
S∞ in −n
S∞
−n
=
{σ
(y0 )} are dense in [0, 1]. The set Dx0 × Dy0 ×
{τ
(x
)}
and
D
0
y0
n=0
n=0
([0, 1] \ Q) is dense in [0, 1]3 and consists of biased points.
Let p be a biased point. We say an integer k ≥ 1 is right biased for p if
(2.3)
Φ(i, k; p) > 0 for all i < k.
For an integer j ≥ 1, −j is left biased for p if
(2.4)
Φ(−j, i; p) > 0 for all i > −j.
We say (j, k) is a biased pair for p if j ≥ 1, k ≥ 1 and −j and k are left and right
biased for p, respectively.
12
Y. SAIKI, H. TAKAHASI AND J. A. YORKE
Proposition 2.4. Let p ∈ [0, 1]3 be a biased point. For any N > 0 there exist
j > N and k > N such that (j, k) is a biased pair for p.
Proof. The first condition in (2.2) implies that mini≤0 Φ(i, 0, p) ≤ 0 exists. By
the second condition in (2.2), for any N > 0 there exists k > N such that
(2.5)
Φ(0, k; p) >
max Φ(0, i; p) and Φ(0, k; p) > − min Φ(i, 0, p).
0≤i≤k−1
i≤0
The first inequality in (2.5) implies Φ(i, k; p) = Φ(0, k; p) − Φ(0, i; p) > 0 for all 0 ≤
i ≤ k − 1. The second inequality in (2.5) implies Φ(i, k; p) = Φ(0, k; p) + Φ(i, 0; p) > 0
for all i ≤ 0. Therefore (2.3) holds and so k is right biased for p. The same argument
shows that for any N > 0 there exists j > N such that −j is left biased for p.
2.5. Construction of bricks for the 3D-HC map. In this subsection we
construct interior (j, k)-bricks for the 3D-HC map F .
Proposition 2.5 (Interior brick). Let p = (x, y, z) ∈ [0, 1]3 be a biased point
such that z ∈
/ Q. For any open subset U of [0, 1]3 containing p, there exist a biased
pair (j, k) for p and an interior (j, k)-brick which is contained in U .
Proof. Let j, k ≥ 1 be such that (j, k) is a biased pair for p. Define X 0 to be the
maximal open subinterval of (0, 1) containing x on which τ k is continuous. Define Y 0
to be the maximal open subinterval of (0, 1) containing y on which σ j is continuous.
Since k is right biased for p, Φ(0, k; p) ≥ 1 holds. Define Z 0 to be the interval
containing z of the form
c+1
c
0
, c ∈ {0, 1, . . . , 2Φ(0,k;p) − 1}.
,
Z =
2Φ(0,k;p) 2Φ(0,k;p)
For each −j ≤ i ≤ k, set Qi = F i (Q0 ) and write Qi = X i × Y i × Z i . For all
−j ≤ i ≤ k − 1, Qi is a subset of some symbol set for F . Moreover, Q−j is a Y
breadbox and Qk is a XZ pizzabox. Therefore, Q0 is a (j, k)-brick containing p.
We have |X 0 |, |Z 0 | → 0 as k → ∞ and |Y 0 | → 0 as j → ∞. In what follows, for
sufficiently large j and k we show that
(2.6)
X −j ⊂ (0, 1), Y k ⊂ (0, 1), Z −j ⊂ (0, 1),
which implies that Q0 is an interior (j, k)-brick, finishing the proof of Prop.2.5.
We show (2.6) using a separate argument for each of the three intervals. First,
let (j, k) be a biased pair for p such that the following hold:
j
j !
1
1
2
2
(2.7)
x − k , x + k ⊂ (0, 1), y −
⊂ (0, 1).
,y +
3
3
3
3
By Prop. 2.4, there are infinitely many such biased pairs (j, k) for p. Note that |X i |
1
holds for all −j ≤ i ≤ k. Since
decreases as i decreases. In particular |X i | = 3k−i
1
0
0
x ∈ X and |X | = 3k , the first condition in (2.7) gives X 0 ⊂ (0, 1). From the
definition of τ in (1.1), if X −j contains 0 or 1, then X 1−j contains 0 or 1, and by
induction X 0 contains 0 or 1, a contradiction. Hence X −j ⊂ (0, 1) holds. The same
type of argument works for Y i . Here |Y i | decreases as i increases. In particular
|Y i | ≤ ( 23 )i+j holds for all −j ≤ i ≤ k. Since y ∈ Y 0 , the second condition in (2.7)
gives Y 0 ⊂ (0, 1). Hence Y k ⊂ (0, 1) holds.
PIECEWISE LINEAR MAPS WITH HETEROGENEOUS CHAOS
13
A proof of Z −j ⊂ (0, 1) is more difficult since |Z i | is not monotone in i. Set
β(p) = − min Φ(i, 0; p) ≥ 0,
i≤0
and fix M ≤ 0 such that
(2.8)
β(p) = −Φ(M, 0; p).
Let (j, k) be a biased pair for p such that
(2.9)
j ≥ M − 1.
Since z is irrational and z ∈ Z 0 , Z 0 does not contain any rational number of the form
a
for some a ∈ N,
(2.10)
2β(p)
provided k is large enough. In the next paragraph we show that if Z −j contains 0 or 1,
then Z 0 contains a rational number of the form in (2.10). This yields a contradiction
and hence Z −j ⊂ (0, 1) holds.
If dZ (F i (p)) = 2 and Z i contains 0 or 1, then Z i+1 contains 0 or 1. If dZ (F i (p)) =
1
1
i
i+1 , and if moreover
2 and Z contains 0 or 1, then 0 or 2 or 1 is an endpoint of Z
dZ (F i+1 (p)) = 2, then Z i+2 contains 0 or 1. Suppose Z i contains 0 or 1. As i increases
any number of consecutive “shrinking” i, i.e., dZ = 21 , followed by an equal or greater
number of expansions, i.e., dZ = 2, results in an interval whose closure contains 0 or
1. Since −j < M and Φ(−j, M, p) ≥ 0 by (2.8) and (2.9), it follows that Z M contains
0 or 1. Then, from (2.8) it follows that Z 0 contains a rational number of the form in
(2.10).
2.6. Density of periodic points. The following theorem establishes one part
of Thm. 1.1, namely, (ii′ ) in the definition of hetero-chaos in Sec. 1.1.
Theorem 2.6. Each non-empty open subset of [0, 1]3 contains a 2-unstable hyperbolic periodic point and a 1-unstable hyperbolic periodic point of the 3D-HC map.
Proof. Let U ⊂ [0, 1]3 be an open set. From Prop. 2.3 and Prop. 2.5, there exist
a biased point p ∈ U , a biased pair (j, k) for p and a (j, k)-brick Q0 contained in
U . By Prop. 2.1, there exists a hyperbolic periodic point in the interior of Q0 that
is 2-unstable for F . Exchanging the roles of F and F −1 we obtain a dense set of
hyperbolic periodic points which are 2-unstable for F −1 . Since these periodic points
are 1-unstable for F , the proof is complete.
2.7. The existence of a dense trajectory. The following theorem establishes
(iii) in the definition of hetero-chaos in Sec. 1.1, the remaining part of Thm. 1.1.
Theorem 2.7. The 3D-HC map has a trajectory that is dense in [0, 1]3 .
Proof. From Prop. 2.3 and Prop. 2.5, there exist a countable dense set of biased
3
points {ps }∞
s=0 ⊂ (0, 1) , and for each s ≥ 0 a biased pair (js , ks ) for ps and an
0
interior (js , ks )-brick Qs which contains ps and is contained in the open ball of radius
1
∞
(s+1) about ps . We will construct a strictly increasing sequence {ns }s=0 in N and a
decreasing sequence {Us }∞
of Y breadboxes
such that Us+1 ⊂ Us and F ns (Us ) ⊂ Q0s
s=0
T∞
T∞
hold for every s ≥ 0. Then s=0 Us = s=0 Us is the intersection of a nested sequence
of compact sets and so is non-empty. The forward trajectory of any point in this
intersection intersects each of the Q0s and so is dense in [0, 1]3 .
A key ingredient for our construction is the next lemma which allows us to connect
two bricks.
14
Y. SAIKI, H. TAKAHASI AND J. A. YORKE
Fig. 9: A Leaf and its image. The leaf Lx , x ∈ [0, 1] is shown on the left and its
image F (Lx ) ⊂ Lτ (x) is shown on the right.
Lemma 2.8 (Two-bricks lemma). Let j ≥ 0, k, m ≥ 1 and let U be an interior
(0, m)-brick and let Q0 be an interior (j, k)-brick. Then Q = F m (U ) ∩ F −j (Q0 ) is an
(m, j + k)-brick and F −m (Q) is an interior (0, j + k + m)-brick with F −m (Q) ⊂ U .
We start the construction with n0 = j0 and U0 = F −j0 (Q01 ). Note that U0 is an
interior (0, n0 + k0 )-brick. Given a (0, ns + ks )-brick Us for some
s ≥ 0, define ns+1 =
ns + js+1 and Us+1 = F −ns −ks F ns +ks (Us ) ∩ F −js+1 (Q0s+1 ) . By Lem. 2.8, Us+1 is a
(0, ns+1 + ks+1 )-brick and satisfies Us+1 ⊂ Us . It follows from this construction that
F ns (Us ) ⊂ Q0s holds for every s ≥ 0.
To prove Lem. 2.8, set U ′ = F −m (Q). Since F m (U ) is an XZ pizzabox and
−j
F (Q0 ) is a Y breadbox, they intersect each other. Set m′ = j + k + m. Notice that
′
F m (U ′ ) is an XZ pizzabox, and U ′ is a Y breadbox and satisfies F m+j (U ′ ) ⊂ Q0 .
Since U is a (0, m)-brick and U ′ ⊂ U , F n (U ′ ) is contained in a symbol set for 0 ≤
n ≤ m − 1. Similarly, since Q0 is a (j, k)-brick and F m (U ′ ) ⊂ F −j (Q0 ), F n (U ′ ) is
contained in a symbol set for m ≤ n ≤ m′ − 1. Hence, U ′ is a (0, m′ )-brick. Since U
and Q0 are interior bricks, it follows that U ′ is an interior brick. Hence U ′ ⊂ U . This
completes the proof of Lem. 2.8 and that of Thm. 2.7.
3. Ergodicity and further properties. This section is organized as follows.
In Sec. 3.1 we prove Thm. 1.2. In Sec. 3.2 we prove Thm. 1.3. In Sec. 3.3 we compute
Lyapunov numbers of typical points.
3.1. Ergodicity. For each x ∈ [0, 1] we set
Lx = {x} × [0, 1]2 ,
and call Lx a leaf through x, or simply a leaf. See Fig. 9. Since the Y direction is
uniformly contracting everywhere for the 3D-HC map, the forward iterations of leaves
are contained in thin strips. The next proposition asserts that diameters of almost all
leaves shrink to 0 under forward iteration.
Proposition 3.1 (Asymptotic contraction on almost all leaves). Let F be the
3D-HC map. For a.e. x ∈ [0, 1] and every n ≥ 0, there exist intervals Yn , Zn such
that F n (Lx ) = {τ n (x)} × Yn × Zn , and |Yn | → 0, |Zn | → 0 as n → ∞.
Proof. For x0 ∈ [0, 1] and n ≥ 0 write pn = F n ((x0 , 0, 0)). Set Y0 = [0, 1] and
Z0 = [0, 1]. By induction one can show that for every n ≥ 0 there exist intervals Yn ,
Zn such that F n (Lx ) = {τ n (x)} × Yn × Zn , and the following hold:
PIECEWISE LINEAR MAPS WITH HETEROGENEOUS CHAOS
15
◦ |Zn | = 1 or |Zn | ≤ 1/2;
◦ If pn ∈ R1 , then |Zn+1 | = |Zn |/2;
◦ If pn ∈ R2 and |Zn | = 1, then |Zn+1 | = |Zn | = 1;
◦ If pn ∈ R2 and |Zn | ≤ 1/2, then |Zn+1 | = 2|Zn |.
Since F contracts |Yn | by a factor of 32 or 16 , |Yn | → 0 as n → ∞. Write x0 as a base
3 number and denote by bk ∈ {0, 1, 2} the k-th trinary digit. Then pk−1 ∈ R1 for
bk = 0, 1 and pk−1 ∈ R2 for bk = 2. This yields
|Zn | ≤ 2−#{1≤k≤n : bk ∈{0,1}} · 2#{1≤k≤n : bk =2}
for all n ≥ 1. Since τ is ergodic, the digits 0, 1, 2 appear equally likely for almost
every x0 , and therefore |Zn | → 0 as n → ∞.
Proof of Thm. 1.2. Let F be the 3D-HC map. Let φ : [0, 1]3 → R be a continuous
Pn−1
function. Since τ is ergodic, by Birkhoff’s ergodic theorem, n1 i=0 φ((τ i (x), 0, 0))
converges a.e. to a constant as n → ∞. Since F i ((x, 0, 0)) = (τ i (x), 0, 0), this limit
is equal to the trajectory average hφi((x, 0, 0)) in (1.3). To show that hφi is constant
a.e., it is enough to show that for almost every x ∈ [0, 1], hφi is constant on the leaf
Lx . This is a consequence of Prop. 3.1 and the uniform continuity of φ. Since φ is an
arbitrary continuous function, the ergodicity of F follows.
Let F be the 2D-HC map and let φ : [0, 1]2 → R be an arbitrary continuous
function. Define ψ : [0, 1]3 → R by ψ(x, y, z) = φ(x, z). From the ergodicity of the
3D-HC map, there exist a set Ω ⊂ [0, 1]3 of full measure and a constant c ∈ R such
that hψi(p) = c holds for all p ∈ Ω. Then hφi(π(p)) = hψi(p) = c holds for all p ∈ Ω.
Since π(Ω) is a set of full measure, hφi is constant a.e. Hence F is ergodic.
Corollary 3.2. Let F be the 2D-HC or the 3D-HC map. For almost every point
p in the domain of definition of F , {F n (p)}n∈N is dense in the domain.
Proof. This is a consequence of Thm.1.2 and Birkhoff’s ergodic theorem.
3.2. Almost every pair is a scrambled pair. Thm 1.3 is a consequence of
the ideas developed in Sec. 3.1.
Proof of Thm. 1.3. The proof of Thm. 1.2 used leaves in [0, 1]3 and the ergodicity
of τ . Here, we use leaves in [0, 1]3 × [0, 1]3 through (x1 , x2 ) of the form Lx1 × Lx2 ,
and the ergodicity of τ × τ relative to the Lebesgue measure on the product space.
Then, the conclusion of Thm. 1.3 follows from Birkhoff’s ergodic theorem.
3.3. Lyapunov numbers. The Lyapunov numbers of a point p ∈ [0, 1]3 are
the geometric means of the diagonal elements of the Jacobian matrix of F along the
trajectory. The Lyapunov number λX in the X direction is 3, and that in the Y and
Z directions are (when they exist)
lim
n→∞
n−1
Y
i=0
1/n
1/n
n−1
Y
dY (F (p))
dZ (F i (p))
and lim
.
i
n→∞
i=0
16
Y. SAIKI, H. TAKAHASI AND J. A. YORKE
From the ergodicity of τ and the form of the map F , typical trajectories spend 32 of
its iterates in R1 and 31 in R2 . The Lyapunov numbers of typical points are as follows:
λX = 3;
2/3 1/3 1/3
2
1
2
×
=
∼ 0.42;
λY =
3
6
27
2/3
1/3
1
1
1/3
λZ =
×2
∼ 0.79.
=
2
2
Since F is volume preserving, the product of the three numbers is 1.
Acknowledgments. We thank the referees for very useful comments, and Suddhasattwa Das, Shin Kiriki, Naoya Sumi for fruitful discussions. YS was supported
by the JST PRESTO JPMJPR16E5 and the JSPS KAKENHI Grant No.17K05360
and 19KK0067. HT was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant No.19KK0067,
19K21835 and 20H01811.
REFERENCES
[1] R. Abraham and S. Smale. Nongenericity of Ω-stability. In Global Analysis (Proc. Sympos.
Pure Math., Vol. XIV, Berkeley, Calif., 1968), pages 5–8. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence,
R.I., 1970.
[2] C. Bonatti and L. J. Dı́az. Persistent nonhyperbolic transitive diffeomorphisms. Ann. of Math.,
143:357–396, 1996.
[3] S. Das and J. A. Yorke. Multichaos from quasiperiodicity. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn, 16:2196–2212,
2017.
[4] S. P. Dawson. Strange nonattracting chaotic sets, crises, and fluctuating Lyapunov exponents.
Phys. Rev. Lett., 76:4348–4351, 1996.
[5] S. P. Dawson, C. Grebogi, T. Sauer, and J. A. Yorke. Obstructions to shadowing when a
Lyapunov exponent fluctuates about zero. Phys. Rev. Lett., 73:1927-1930, 1994.
[6] L. J. Dı́az, S. Kiriki, and K. Shinohara. Blenders in centre unstable Hénon-like families: with
an application to heterodimensional bifurcations. Nonlinearity, 27:353–378, 2014.
[7] P. Glendinning. Milnor attractors and topological attractors of a piecewise linear map. Nonlinearity, 14:239–257, 2001.
[8] A. S. Gritsun. Unstable periodic trajectories of a barotropic model of the atmosphere. Russ.
J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling, 23:345–367, 2008.
[9] A. S. Gritsun. Statistical characteristics, circulation regimes and unstable periodic orbits of a
barotropic atmospheric model. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 371:20120336, 2013.
[10] B. P. Kitchens. Symbolic dynamics: one-sided, two-sided and countable state Markov shifts.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998.
[11] E. J. Kostelich, I. Kan, C. Grebogi, E. Ott, and J. A. Yorke. Unstable dimension variability:
A source of nonhyperbolicity in chaotic systems. Physica D, 109:81–90, 1997.
[12] T.-Y. Li and J. A. Yorke. Period three implies chaos. The American Mathematical Monthly,
82:985–992, 1975.
[13] E. N. Lorenz. Predictability: a problem partly solved. In Seminar on Predictability, 1, pages
1–18. ECMWF, Reading, 1996.
[14] R. Mañé. Contributions to the stability conjecture. Topology, 17:397–405, 1978.
[15] R. F. Pereira, S. E. de S. Pinto, R. L. Viana, S. R. Lopes, and C. Grebogi. Periodic orbit
analysis at the onset of the unstable dimension variability and at the blowout bifurcation.
Chaos, 17:023131, 2007.
[16] A. S. Pikovsky and P. Grassberger. Symmetry breaking bifurcation for coupled chaotic attractors. J. Phys. A:Math. Gen., 24:4587–4597, 1991.
[17] Y. Saiki, M. A. F. Sanjuán, and J. A. Yorke. Low-dimensional paradigms for high-dimensional
hetero-chaos. Chaos, 28:103110, 2018.
[18] W. Seidel. Note on a metrically transitive system. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 19:453–456,
1933.
[19] M. Shub. Topologically transitive diffeomorphisms of T 4 . Lecture Notes in Math., 206:39–40,
1971.
PIECEWISE LINEAR MAPS WITH HETEROGENEOUS CHAOS
17
[20] C. P. Simon. A 3-dimensional Abraham-Smale example. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 34:629–630,
1972.
[21] P. Walters, An Introduction to Ergodic Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 79, SpringerVerlag, New York, 1982.