SURVIVAL

There Exists A Powerful Propensity For Human Scientific Inquiry To Be 'Force-Fitted' To PreDetermined Perceptions Of Reality. Stephen Hawking CH CBE FRS FRSA, British theoretical physicist and cosmologist states: " The eventual goal of science is to provide a single theory that describes the whole universe ". This statement of fundamentally flawed defective logic is a profoundly erroneous premise for legitimate scientific inquiry. The premise is flawed because the falsehood of 'the whole universe' cannot exist. Nor can the fictional notion of 'time', or the fabricated concept of 'the beginning'; or the 'concocted' state of 'nothing' be existing. Both intergalactic and quantum mechanics physics reality demonstrate this by observation and testing now, showing understanding of gravity density forces, matter, energy and distance impacts are utterly erroneous.

The 'black hole' is a metaphor for a reality in the psyche of many individuals who have experienced complex trauma in infancy and early childhood. The 'black hole' has been created by an absence of the object, the (m)other, so there is no internalized object, no (m)other in the psyche. Rather, there is a 'black hole' where the object should be, but the infant is drawn to it, trapped by it because of an intrinsic, instinctive need for a 'real object', an internalized (m)other. Without this, the infant cannot develop. It is only the presence of a real object that can generate the essential gravity necessary to draw the core of the self that is still in an undeveloped state from deep within the abyss. It is the moving towards a real object, a (m)other, that relativizes the absolute power of the black hole and begins a reformation of its essence within the psyche.

2017 ICOMOS CIPA-ICORP-ISCARSAH Joint Meeting, 2017

The paper deals with human condition, gravitationally regarded from the perspective of Cultural Heritage. The secrets of the universe unlocked by Stephen Hawking at the end of the 20 th century were received with great hope worldwide. Later he admitted that the mystery of gravity could not be disclosed. Since the case persisted, in 2017 he AI from destroying the human race. Looking back, history has shown that homo erectus had a natural evolution. The transitory process of acquiring consciousness by receiving a mind passed discretely. It was recently proved that the Sphinx in Egypt is a memorial devoted to that event. Then, the Legend of Oedipus disclosed the true identity of homo gravitas. Meanwhile other legends were decrypted. An advanced gravitational civilization was created on the Earth along a few millennia. Unexpected problems arouse by the growth in population. At the end of the 19 th century Nietzsche asked for a Superman. A few decades later, in 1907, Brancusi carved in stone a little sphinx statue as though bewilderedly asking Quo Vadis? Thirty years later, in 1937, the same sculptor gave a revolutionary solution to the control of the body-mind equilibrium. That solution

There Exists A Powerful Propensity For Human Scientific Inquiry To Be 'Force-Fitted' To Pre-Determined Perceptions Of Reality. Stephen Hawking CH CBE FRS FRSA, British theoretical physicist and cosmologist states: “The eventual goal of science is to provide a single theory that describes the whole universe”. This statement of fundamentally flawed defective logic is a profoundly erroneous premise for legitimate scientific inquiry. The premise is flawed because the falsehood of ‘the whole universe’ cannot exist. Nor can the fictional notion of ‘time’, or the fabricated concept of ‘the beginning’; or the ‘concocted’ state of ‘nothing’ be existing. Both intergalactic and quantum mechanics physics reality demonstrate this by observation and testing now, showing understanding of gravity density forces, matter, energy and distance impacts are utterly erroneous.

Journal of big history, 2023

D2D Digital, 2023

What truly accounts for the profound attraction that pulls all existing toward cohesion across the cosmos? Is gravitational allure merely illusion emanating statistically from a deeper dance whose steps we've yet to fully fathom? This book orbits perilous fringes where accepted physics dissolves into imagination's starlit vistas. Guided by seasoned insights though unafraid to question orthodoxies, we navigate beyond current theory seeking gravity's origins in possible symmetries interlacing quantum and cosmological domains. Our voyage envisions reality's foundation stitched by hidden entanglements, itched by probabilities, and stretched by momentary microscopic maneuvers collectively achieving smooth macroscopic outcomes mischaracterized as "forces" bellowing curvature. Journals logged across chapters chart speculative trajectories seeking to reconstitute gravity from the inside-out as perhaps the oldest offspring from nature's probability, information, and emergence union forged across eons since the first ticks of cosmic time."

This paper explores the cosmology of contemporary science, theory and fiction, arguing that science fiction— especially as it turns to consider fundamental concepts in physics—is pressed by the demands of thematic unity towards the holistic frameworks developed in the physics of the scientific underground, which is itself an extension of concepts in the theory of dynamical systems and complexity. The film "Interstellar" is highlighted in particular for its exploration of gravity—a concept not well conceptualized in physics, despite its centrality to our cosmology. A better understanding of space and time is sketched through a more intuitive look at gravity. As anticipated by Goethe and the reciprocal systems theory developed by Dewey Larson, a relational and topological physics is argued to be the future of our cosmological understanding and an inevitable consequence of our converging threads of knowledge acquisition.

2015

The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or noncommercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. "I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives."

2000

Although theories and speculations abound, there is no consensus on the origin or cause of gravity. Presumably, this status of affair is due to the lack of any experimental guidance. In this paper, we will discuss its ontological origin, implications and potential applications by thinking outside the mainstream notions of general relativity and quantum gravity. We argue that gravity originates

The anticipated next stage of human organization is often described by futurists as a global technological singularity. This next stage of complex organization is hypothesized to be actualized by scientific-technic knowledge networks. However, the general consequences of this process for the meaning of human existence are unknown. Here, it is argued that cosmic evolutionary philosophy is a useful worldview for grounding an understanding of the potential nature of this futures event. In the cosmic evolutionary philosophy, reality is conceptualized locally as a universal dynamic of emergent evolving relations. This universal dynamic is structured by a singular astrophysical origin and an organizational progress from sub-atomic particles to global civilization mediated by qualitative phase transitions. From this theoretical ground, we attempt to understand the next stage of universal dynamics in terms of the motion of general ideation attempting to actualize higher unity. In this way, we approach technological singularity dialectically as an event caused by ideational transformations and mediated by an emergent intersubjective objectivity. From these speculations, a historically-engaged perspective on the nature of human consciousness is articulated where the truth of reality as an emergent unity depends on the collective action of a multiplicity of human observers.