Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Narrating Loyalty in George of Pisidia and Manuel Philes

2024, Poetry in Late Byzantium, ed. K. Kubina

https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004699687_007

Abstract

The article compares the role of the narrator in the laudatory poems of Byzantine authors George of Pisidia and Manuel Philes. In George of Pisidia's works, the narrator has two distinct personas: that of a poet and that of a citizen. The singular form of pronouns and verbs is used when speaking about the process of writing a poem, while plural forms are used for addressing the emperor or speaking about historical events. This, in my view, can be linked to what Anthony Kaldellis describes as the "Byzantine Republic," in which the emperor's power depended on the consent of the general populace. Thus, George of Pisidia's poems reflect—or, in times of crisis, perhaps imitate—this popular support. In contrast, Manuel Philes rarely uses plural forms. He emphasizes his personal connection with the addressee, turning his poems into a form of private conversation. This could be seen as a sign of the decline of the "Byzantine Republic" and the increasing reliance on personal connections and family ties in the exercise of power.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.