Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2024, Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (CJMS)
https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2024.v04i06.030…
7 pages
1 file
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the economic and social indicators of Afghanistan, a country grappling with the effects of prolonged conflict, political instability, and economic challenges. These economic indicators explored include Gross Domestic Product (GDP), unemployment rate, inflation, and trade balance, reflecting the volatile yet crucial aspects of Afghanistan’s economic landscape. Social indicators such as population demographics, literacy rates, life expectancy, healthcare, and education are examined to understand the living conditions and developmental progress with the country. Despite notable advancements in areas like healthcare and education, Afghanistan continues to face significant hurdles, including high unemployment, low literacy rates, and limited access to essential service. This article aims to provide a balanced overview of Afghanistan’s current status, highlighting both progress and persistent challenges, and underscores the need for coordinated efforts to foster stability and sustainable development. Through this analysis, readers gain insights into the multifaceted nature of Afghanistan’s development and the critical areas that require ongoing attention and support.
Regular, 2020
This study examined the economic development in Afghanistan in 2002-2019. Secondary data were used, which were collected and retrieved from annual reports of various public, non-government’s organizations and World Bank. Using descriptive statistics analysis, it was found that the overall economic situations and performances of the country aren’t in accordance with the expectations, poverty and unemployment rates are constantly increasing. Afghanistan had huge trade deficit in the study period, on average imports raised by 88.33 percent from US $3251 million in 2002 to US $7407 million in 2018. Furthermore, economic growth declined from 8.8 percent in 2003 to 1.0 percent in 2018. Real GDP per capita was only US $ 520.9 in 2018. Reduction in international aids, withdrawal of international forces, worsening security situations, political instability, high corruption, severe droughts, higher population growth rate than economic growth rate, weak investors’ confidence and lack of smooth...
International Journal of Applied Research and Studies , 2020
Afghanistan a country that is rich in natural resources yet economically suffers unnecessarily. This paper presents the factors that contribute to its becoming a poor country in the South Asian Region. This paper uses content analysis of published books and journal articles that explore the socioeconomic and political landscape of Afghanistan which shape the country today. This study finds that the internal factors which helped make the country unnecessarily economically challenged were lack of woman participation in the society, lack of access to education, and intertribal conflict among the locals while on the other hand, the external factors were the foreign occupation of the British, Soviets and the United States of America and its allies. Combined all together, Afghanistan became a country that is rich in natural resources yet suffers from economic setbacks unnecessarily.
International journal of scientific and research publications, 2021
The study focused on the challenges and prospects of Afghanistan’s economy. It is based on analysis and reviews of previous studies on the issues related to the Afghanistan economy. Afghanistan is one of the landlocked countries in Asia. The economy of Afghanistan has been affected by various challenges since 1979 A.D. Challenges such as foreign attacks, civil wars, political instability, foreign interferences, and illiteracy were the main reasons that arose so many other economic issues like poverty, unemployment, inflation, brain drain, capital flight, budget deficit, poor tax collection, low productivity, and the primitive agricultural system just to mention the few. Most of the studies conducted on the challenges and prospects or issues related to Afghanistan’s economy were based on secondary data and hence there are not enough studies in the area. Study on this topic is very important because the Afghan economy faced various challenges which required feasible and lasting soluti...
2007
World Bank. The views, findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the author and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, its Executive Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. About the SASPR Working Paper Series The purpose of the SASPR Working Paper Series is to provide a quick outlet for sharing more broadly research/analysis of issues related to development in South Asia. Although the primary source of such research/analysis in SASPR staff, other contributors are most welcome to use this outlet for rapid publication of their research that is relevant to South Asia's development. The papers are informal in nature and basically represent views/analysis of the concerned author(s). All papers submitted for publication are sent for an outside review to assure quality. I provide only a very light editorial touch. For enquiries about submission of papers for publication in the series or for copies of published papers, please contact Naomi Dass (telephone number 202-458-0335).
Economic Instability and Uncertainty in Afghanistan after August 15, 2021
The current political uncertainty clouds the future macroeconomic pathways for Afghanistan. With limited data and the national economic policy in a state of flux, it is a challenge to provide full scale economic modeling and projections. Some assumptions are clear – such as the freeze on Afghanistan’s foreign reserves held in Western countries; a burgeoning trade imbalance; stagnant private economic initiatives; and a debt overhang that cannot be serviced. However, working with what we have, a rapid economic appraisal has been captured in this analysis. Depending on how the conflict evolves, the country could add economic losses of up to 13 percent to its unfolding tragedy by the middle of 2022. That percentage may seem modest given the scale of the country’s crisis, but not when it translates into real poverty.2 A 10-13 percent reduction in GDP could, in the worst-case scenario, bring Afghanistan to the precipice of near universal poverty – a 97 percent poverty rate by mid-2022 – despite the difficult but real progress achieved over the last 20 years. With skyrocketing food prices and an interruption in economic activities and essential services, food insecurity is rising precipitously. The health status of much of the population, already compounded by COVID-19, is also of immediate concern. These ‘life shocks’ are felt hardest in poor urban and rural communities, where the most vulnerable are facing the unenviable choice of either finding a way to sustain their livelihoods while remaining in place or joining the large numbers already displaced. It is estimated that half a million people have already been displaced in the months leading up to the Aug 15th take over.
Afghanistan’s development problems are often assumed to be predominantly due to its internal warfare that started in 1978. Is this assumption correct? I consider this by comparing Afghanistan from 1961 to 1995 with the Pakistan province of Khyber Pakhtunkwah (KPK) in terms of agricultural land productivity and look at any potential reasons for the trends found. I choose KPK province because of the many similarities with Afghanistan regarding the determinants of agricultural productivity such as similar soil features, absence of colonial investments, land tenure and farm shape and crops grown mostly for subsistence. Instead of divergence in 1978 or after, I find no divergence as Afghanistan and KPK generally have a cointegrated relationship. Nevertheless, closer examination of the trends in land productivity along with cropped land and agricultural output provides evidence conflict is the dominant explanation. This paper is the first to undertake an agricultural output comparison between Afghanistan and the KPK and to incorporate opium data into the agricultural output of Afghanistan from 1986 to 1995.